TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

winsome_churchill Archive

View 4 posts and 19 comments by winsome_churchill on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

We have tried discussing with them. They immediately resort to calling us "FAAAAAAGOTS" etc. I honestly believe they are radfem trolls.
/r/MensRights17/05/14 08:03 PM
1

What they're doing is trying to strengthen and protect the MRM. You'd do well to consider the same.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 10:48 PM
2

Everybody: as this article has now appeared on this sub, Manhood Academy trolls will flood it with hate. if you have time, do your bit to debunk them and shut them down. This article can be huge for us; don't let these radfem trolls ruin the party.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 10:46 PM
2

It does. But the teenagers here won't see sense.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 09:14 PM
1

Sigh. When someone has an opinion you don't like, you spit out that tired old shit. You do realise you sound like a fucking idiot, don't you?
/r/MensRights15/05/14 09:13 PM
1

They're barely reported and are recorded even less, so figures would be unreliable.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 02:25 PM
1

What annoyed me was the guy made it clear it was how without knowing the context, they jumped on him straight away and made it about gender and female empowerment.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 09:18 AM
1

It's their job to hire feminists. If there was a MRM-friendly service, it would insist on understanding of men's issues. Why is this here?
/r/MensRights09/03/14 09:53 PM
4

Yeah, good point. We just need to be aware, is all.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 03:40 PM
8

This is a very good point.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 03:39 PM
4

Probably true. But we can't know for certain, so for any parties popping over here, I think we should be seem to criticise such behaviour. It's all PR. And at the moment, the MRMs PR is not great!
/r/MensRights11/12/13 03:39 PM
4

This sub is the only place (that I'm aware of) that has publicised her comments. So, if her accusations are correct (and that's a big fucking if), it makes sense that the culprit would have read about her here. It wasn't an accusation, more of 'seriously, if you are thinking of doing something stupid to wind her up, don't bother'.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 03:37 PM
7

Yeah, her work (usually with a strong feminist bias) has been published in some big, big publications. Light needs to be shone on emotional opinions like hers by people with rational, scientific-based reasoning.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 08:16 PM
17

It seems she also writes a lot about how damaging comics are to women. Like a paper-focused Sarkeesian.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 08:13 PM
1

The writer is not a feminist writer though. Rather, he is a regular guy who's go-to opinion of the MRM is that we're idiots. He's since removed the comment, which is excellent. But my point still stands.
/r/MensRights24/10/13 09:15 AM
1

He took the MRA reference out before I got to the article. Good.
/r/MensRights24/10/13 09:00 AM
2

Unfortunately, I'm correct. AVfM is a cancer in the MRM.
/r/MensRights23/10/13 02:51 PM
2

You should ply your trade somewhere that people respect.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 12:37 PM
-4

Pro tip - make your arguments without linking to AVFM, it'll win over more people. Personally, even though I'm an MRA, I see links to that shithole of a site and roll my eyes in bewilderment that people serious about making Men's Rights works still visits it.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 06:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter