TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

wiscondinavian Archive

View 0 posts and 46 comments by wiscondinavian on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Average time served for actually raping someone is 6 years...
/r/PussyPass11/07/14 12:50 AM
2

Are you kidding me? If if I were able to deflect the gallon of milk, that shit would break my arm. If it got to my head, I'd be knocked out instantly.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 04:13 PM
1

To be fair, everyone in the US army is there because they chose to be. They weren't drafted.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 04:08 PM
1

Not often...
/r/MensRights09/07/13 02:12 AM
2

Except girls is also used to refer to adult women, but boys is not often used to refer to adult men. I wonder up to what age the jails keep the kids? If it's up to 18 I can see your point, but if it holds them until their 20 or 21, that's generally just the way it is. It's generally women who get upset about this terminology.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 07:45 PM
1

Were you originally talking about female oppression? Or opression in general?
/r/MensRights08/07/13 07:23 PM
1

Just like I disagree with some feminist arguments, I disagree with some mens rights arguments. It's something perfectly natural. I'm not here to ague with you all though, just here to defend myself and my post.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 07:06 PM
1

Read the thread My comment within the link: Ladies, does this look like someone looking for a problem here? At first I read, great, we're breaching that gap so that men and women live longer, and more equal-length lives. But then the article goes, but that's bad for women. Whut? No. Also, it's great for us straight ladies, because that means that our partner is living longer (and it's quite possible that he's a couple years older than us anyways) meaning that he'll be in our lives longer.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 06:51 PM
1

My comment within the link: Ladies, does this look like someone looking for a problem here? At first I read, great, we're breaching that gap so that men and women live longer, and more equal-length lives. But then the article goes, but that's bad for women. Whut? No. Also, it's great for us straight ladies, because that means that our partner is living longer (and it's quite possible that he's a couple years older than us anyways) meaning that he'll be in our lives longer.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 06:45 PM
2

The OP has it out for me since he thinks that 40yo men should be able to have sex with 14yos, but he has no problem with the child labor laws and other similar laws to protect children. So no, he didn't read my comments, he just searched through my history and attempted to find something "ridiculous" I said. Of course, now I'm doing the same thing, but meh I however believe firmly in equality for men and women, and that's why I was pointing out the silliness of the article. While there are a lot…
/r/MensRights08/07/13 06:44 PM
2

Of course. If someone can outstrength their partner until help can come by, they should. If someone slaps you on the arm, it doesn't justify punching and breaking the other person's nose though.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 02:33 AM
0

Please note that this is talking about LOOKING FOR THREATS. This is quite obvious if you think about it.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 02:20 AM
1

The women who would chose to cover themselves up to be oppressed. But those who are stoned for not wearing a head covering... how can you say they're not being oppressed? BTW, the word you want to use is probably oppress, not suppress. There's nuances between the two words.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 02:01 AM
1

As I said, fake science, but I assume that blush and lipstick were first used to immitate the flushed look post-coitus.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 01:53 PM
1

Read my history, you're more than welcome to.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 08:48 PM
1

Fine, I'm going to lump all MRAs as mysogonistic overreactive crazies as well, because obviously to not want to be treated as an inferior or a rapist because of your gender is ridiculous
/r/MensRights04/12/12 08:30 PM
2

I think a better analogy would be blow job, never consented to use of teeth:sex with condom, took off condom
/r/MensRights04/12/12 08:08 PM
1

Would you mind not lumping all feminists together?
/r/MensRights04/12/12 08:02 PM
2

Dontcha know that people being naked is pornography? eyeroll As a woman, this is exactly why Mens Rights needs to exist. Not as a counterargument to extreme-Femenists, nor to enter into a competition with which gender suffers more, but rather as a reaction to the inequalities men face.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 08:00 PM
1

Being a chef is dominated by men. Cooking at home is dominated by women.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 07:58 PM
2

Woman here with some fake science and personal story: Lipstick and blush make sense from a biological need (red lips and flush face means you're horny, dontcha know?), and full coverage helps hide any imperfections (beauty is expected of women, earning money is expected from men), and I feel whatever eyeshadow you use is just for style. I've actually stopped wearing make up to work, because I don't wear make up every day. When I wore make-up Monday through Thrusday one week, and didn't wear it o…
/r/MensRights04/12/12 07:53 PM
1

I don't think he was talking about restriction, but rather "please don't do this" self-patroling.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 07:14 PM
0

Whut?
/r/MensRights04/12/12 07:05 PM
3

Not even 50/50! Each parent gets 100%/0% say if they want to keep a child. It's like a recessive gene matrix. Adopt/Keep, Keep/Adopt, Keep/Keep, Adopt/Adopt, only in the last combo will the child be adopted out.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 07:04 PM
4

Honestly, her sharing genes with the guy doesn't make being with him the "best for the child." The adoptive parents have their legal leg to stand on, they've adopted the child, which from their side, was done with all of the pomp and circumstance required, and have since taken the child as "their" child. It would actually be quite odd if they gave the child up without a second thought. If they were truly ignorant of the actual situation, they should be compensated by the birth mom as well, becau…
/r/MensRights04/12/12 07:01 PM
5

Link?
/r/MensRights04/12/12 06:47 PM
1

Not really. Things like sales will be strictly men. Administrative assistant, only women. Cashier women. Stocking men. Even stuff like lab work and engineering sometimes have a male-female preference.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 11:54 PM
2

I'm a female living in Chile, and I find it crazy that so many jobs are male-only and female-only positions. They also heavily discriminate according to age. Seriously, if you're qualified for the job, how on earth does your age/gender/sexual orientation/race affect anything? I just did a quick search on my favor job-searching website in Chile, and noticed that there were equal amounts of pages for a search of hombre/man and mujer/woman. Separate but equal...
/r/MensRights22/11/12 04:08 PM
1

Yeah, itsno disease, but projectiling things out through both ends (sometimes at the same time ) is no walk in the park. Blaming every symptom on “lady problems“ is really no different than blaming every pain on “man flu.“ Both are condescending, and as shown by the original commenter, potentially dangerous.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 01:28 PM
2

This happens to both genders really. The other month I was out of work for 2 days (vomiting and diarrhea, yay...) and of course guys from work like to comment on how I must have been having some "lady problems" after telling them that I was vomiting and with diarrhea. ???? Seriously though, if my fiance told me that I was overreacting, that definitely wouldn't stop me from going to the doctor's... although that wouldn't happen. He basically forces me to go to the doctor's over silly things like …
/r/MensRights02/11/12 05:39 AM
1

As a woman living with her fiance, men are fucking disgusting when it comes to bathrooms...
/r/MensRights02/11/12 05:22 AM
1

If they indeed have dicks, it's okay then. Yes?
/r/MensRights02/11/12 05:18 AM
1

And did you bother to report them?
/r/MensRights02/11/12 05:12 AM
1

Yes, but you could say that only 10% of female-male cases are reported/counted, and that would bring the number up to 1% of all rapes. So yes, we need to change the definition of rape to include all things that are, for lack of a better word, rapey. And it's hard to define rapey. Can you define it as forced sex? No, because that excludes most raping of children. Coerced sex? Well that's a fine line. Is it rape if a secretary fucks her boss because she thinks she'll lose her job? In my book, no. …
/r/MensRights18/10/12 02:39 PM
1

Yeah, it's also skewed because it defines it as forced penetration, so getting someone black out drunk and then having sex with them doesn't count. And not everyone reports the crimes. And because men supposedly report their rapes less than women. And because some rapes are discarded by the police and not counted. And sometimes false rape accusations happen. And not all State definitions meat what the DOJ/FBI say. No it's not a perfect number, but they've improved the FBI definition by including…
/r/MensRights18/10/12 01:52 PM
1

Okay, that's a problem of trivilizing rape. And people trivilize man-man rape and man-woman rape and woman-man rape. All equally wrong. Much different than trying to divert more attention to female-male rape, when male-male rape is much more common. Do I think that female-male rape should be considered rape in a legal sense? Of course. Should recovery treatment be provided? Yes. However, awareness shouldn't just focus on female-male rape. Awareness should be spreading that 10% of rape victims ar…
/r/MensRights18/10/12 12:48 PM
2

I think I've literally seen one news article about women raping men in my whole life. Man on man rape however, is very prevalent in today's society, and is a real much more common event.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 11:21 PM
1

who says the poster is made for men?
/r/MensRights21/08/12 09:32 PM
0

Right, because language means nothing? The intent of words means nothing, while only how your receive it is what counts? Man, so many people have been absolutely racist and sexist around me all day. Saying stuff like "hi" and "how are you doing." Do you really think that hate is only a percepcion?
/r/MensRights17/08/12 08:52 PM
1

What you call for here is what I thought this subreddit would be, and something that I could support, as a woman. Instead, indeed, it does seem to be a bunch of circle-jerking of how women are so awful and all feminists do is try to oppress men.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 08:49 PM
1

Except that it sounds like the same, prejudiced, hate than many "feminists" put out. While lack of proof does not necessarily mean innocence, no need to go around spouting conspiracy theories. Was male contreception left out on purpose? Possibly. But that's the question, and thus you create a debate, rather than a circlejerk of "damn those feminists!"
/r/MensRights17/08/12 08:22 PM
1

No, she would not. If she was, I'm sure about 100% of all sperm banks would be put out of business, because no one would want someone coming back later asking for child support.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 08:05 PM
2

Hmm, as a woman I find it disheartening that they wouldn't include male sterilization for free as well (especially since it's cheaper/safer in general). If we have a viable male non-permanant birth control method coming as well, it would be great for it to be free for men as well. If the OP has some real information of why femenists would be against male birth control, that would be great, but the OP seems to just be upset at women in general... without any real information that femenists are th…
/r/MensRights17/08/12 07:38 PM
0

It's called a pre-nup!
/r/MensRights17/08/12 05:25 PM
1

Selective service wasn't put in place by women, it was put in place by men. There are many women that would like to go out into the line of battle and fight voluntarily, and many more that would be okay with being drafted.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 05:24 PM
14

You're saying that calling someone a nigger, isn't over the line?
/r/MensRights17/08/12 05:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter