with_no_addressee Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
0	The world does not cater to male sexuality. That is not obvious. Why should I not think there are at least two ways?	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/11/25 10:53 PM
0	The world does not cater to male sexuality. I have resorted to no such attacks, and have indirectly, or at least partially, answered your question, by stating "I am arguing exactly and only what I have stated."	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/11/25 10:30 PM
1	The world does not cater to male sexuality. I am arguing exactly and only what I have stated. If you are able to read English, you should be able to glean what I am arguing by reading the words and sentences I have written. It is an unseemly tactic to sputter out mealy-mouthed diversion of the kind, "Um.. are you really arguing that [X extrapolation that is fearfully and resentfully brought to your mind by reading what I have written]?", because you are unable to confront my argument head-on, since I have said nothing incorrect. a spouse …	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/11/25 10:20 PM
0	Let's say something nice about the opposite sex. In principle, females are capable of bringing Men boundless, utopian sexual pleasure, even if they choose not to exercise this capability for the sake of their own social and psychic power.	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/11/25 01:01 PM
0	The world does not cater to male sexuality. In fact, neither of those things answer your question, which remains unanswered.	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/11/25 12:34 PM
1	The world does not cater to male sexuality. This sarcastic response has failed to convince me that, in fact, you are asking any of the millions of misandristic women who dominate online spaces today whether or not they really desire men in anything resembling the terms in which you pose the question to men.	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/11/25 12:26 PM
-1	The world does not cater to male sexuality. You do not and are lying; even if you broach the topic, it is not in the same terms. They are sexually attracted to men, as are all women; their resentment arises from that sexuality and is its negative expression. This, however, is a complicated dynamic which I do not wish to explain to you.	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/11/25 12:18 PM
-5	The world does not cater to male sexuality. I will assent to addressing this question only once you have asked the corresponding question to every misandristic woman on social platforms like Twitter, TickTik, reddit, and so on. There are several million such women, so I would get moving.	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/11/25 12:11 PM
–	The world does not cater to male sexuality. It is a BASED response because I am BASED. Did you? Did I what? I did not claim myself to do anything, and so this question, which is phrased as the repetition in interrogative form of a claim I made that took myself as a subject and some action verb as a predicate, strikes me as utterly unintelligible. Did you build roads, invented something, brought something to society on that scale? Men did, as per my sentence. I would encourage you to take reading comprehension lessons. Then what puts you a…	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/11/25 12:06 PM
-1	The world does not cater to male sexuality. I have facts, reason, and a logical argument. Feminists just decide things are rape. Marital rape wasn’t even a recognized as a crime until 1960s onwards. Only an absolute idiot would state marital rape is not a historical social construct or was transhistorically understood to be rape. Edit: I have notice that the reddit moderators, stifling free debate, seem to have hidden my reply to the braindead, sub-20 IQ human toilet u/cb8585b. In the interest of preserving the whole debate so that impart…	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/11/25 12:02 PM
-2	The world does not cater to male sexuality. And? Edit: The user with whom I was arguing appears to have blocked me. This shows that my argument possessed the superior power of reason; the BASED pill has proven to be victorious once again. Edit: Somebody has made a comment below to which I am unable to respond. They have made the incorrect statement that "Debates are won/lost by a judge or by the parties who are listening/reading." In fact, one can win a debate but be judged to have lost it by onlookers, if one is in the company of idiots.	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/11/25 11:58 AM
-4	The world does not cater to male sexuality. Okay, you are girlraping me right now. I am the victim of the crime girlraping, and so it is up to me to decide what its definition is; I have decided its definition is that it is when u/bondepart replies "Um, yeah the victims of a crime should have more say over the definition of the crime than the perpetrators. The perpetrators have a vested interest in their behaviour being considered legal." to a Reddit post of mine. See how that works? Anyway, you have undermined your own argument. If rape …	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/11/25 11:55 AM
-3	The world does not cater to male sexuality. This link does not disprove, nor furnish a counterargument against, anything I say. It could only be construed as a counterargument if I were to view it is an impotent, flailing, resentful, emotional appeal. But I decide on my views on the basis of the habit of Reason. Facts do not care about your feelings.	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/11/25 11:46 AM
-8	The world does not cater to male sexuality. The discourse that determines what is rape is today run by feminist women. What better reason is there to trust feminist women over the men of the past? Have they been given, by God, the skeleton key to the one, true, incontestable definition of rape? In fact, even if a definition of rape was drafted by a council consisting in equal parts of men and women, that would not save it from being a historical, social construction. It is a meaningless abstraction to say "society" was "run" by "men." All…	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/11/25 11:45 AM
-9	The world does not cater to male sexuality. Men went mad or killed themselves because they were married to annoying, nagging women. There was also a huge history of women poisoning their wives. The idea that men were just happy with the situation, and enjoyed total privilege, is just a feminist simplification by historical illiterates. Ugh gross Not an argument; such shaming is the recourse of the weaker mind as it trembles in the light of Reason. Edit: I would add that nothing you say in this reply rebuts, or even addresses, any of my po…	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/11/25 11:30 AM
-5	The world does not cater to male sexuality. What? "cater to male sexuality" = "force women to fuck men". You fail to substantiate this—either in the sense of your attributing this meaning to OP or positing it yourself. One could think of several situations in which women were not 'forced' to fuck men, but in which society catered to male sexuality (to use OP's language). For example, a society that expected modesty from women, and that penalized them for immodesty, so that they could not continually inflict—and benefit from, in terms of t…	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/11/25 11:27 AM
-12	The world does not cater to male sexuality. There's no more reason to understand the long history of arranged marriages (or kinship relations structured by any organizing principle other than the love marriage) to be tantamount to "societally endorsed rape" than there is to understand the long history of sons' being forced or expected to take up their fathers' line of work (farmer, blacksmith, etc.) as tantamount to slavery. It's feminist claptrap. People alive at the time were cognizant of the concept of rape, which they understood to me…	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/11/25 10:59 AM