TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

wixenus Archive

View 0 posts and 34 comments by wixenus on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)

hell yeah. of course it is good. it filters the men not suitable for healthy relationships out the market, so we get a better deal have fun fucking plastic with chatgpt on it :)
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 09:55 PM
2

No, I live in a very cosmopolitan area in fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 09:39 PM
2

I do not know what you are even talking about. I am not even from the U.S.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 09:34 PM
6

Hypergamy is just a preference. And a very good one in fact. Because women have the least advantage from a relationship, they want to find the men that are better than them. Evolutionary sensible and simple as that. 666 everyone talks about is an overexaggeration and a dream at best. Women do not chase the 1% elite of men, that is bullshit. I can see it by the boyfriends that women around me have. They are just normal guys, who are in a sense "better" from the girl they are dating. They are not …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 04:01 PM
2

I guess it is part of the image. Alpha manosphere think it's beta to marry and so they do not show themselves marrying or even having a relationship. Alpha manosphere values quantity over quality, so there is the answer.
/r/seduction24/11/25 07:22 AM
3

I do not. It is a matter of me craving intimacy. I believe you can never be intimate on an emotional level, because it's a robot, it won't have a life of its own, they won't have their own emotions. If you want your generic needs fulfilled, it may very well provide that but I want something more human in nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 12:46 PM
1

Sure, but "physically" and "sexually" means two different things. As you said, you can observe physical attraction pretty early. Because it's not bound by time. It's an instant judgment our brain makes. But "sexual" attraction is a different thing from "physical" attraction. It may very well require time. The person in front of you may like you physically, but maybe not sexually yet. Sex, by itself, should require some sort of trust before the act, even if it is a hookup. Most of the women, espe…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 12:26 PM
1

There are no mixed signals. There are either signals, or no signals. Anything between those should be considered no signals.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/25 08:58 PM
1

Correct assessment but incorrect thinking. If we have always done the things minimum just because of the absence of guarantee of success, we would still be in stone ages. You do not do things in relationships because you expect it to come back to you. Instead in healthy relationships, you do things for the kindness of your own heart. You do not assume, you do not expect. If they actually cherish and value the things you did for them, they may reciprocate. And they may not. And that is where you …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/25 12:12 PM
1

You are replaceable, and it should be that way. My ideal dating space is that everyone should be replaceable. So you enjoy the time with another with minimal attachment, no expectations and assumptions and also level up yourself on the side, so the people around you may enjoy you more. Although the reality is much more kind than this, having this enhancing yourself and being unassuming should help you in the long run.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/25 11:51 AM
1

Yeah, also water is wet too.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 06:49 PM
4

Agree. We need to build healthy (can't believe I need to use this word) male spaces that are innately supportive. And I believe it's not a thing that is impossible to achieve. It has been achieved before. Women can not contribute to it other than supporting us, while we better our lives. A support group that will help you every step of the way, while you find yourselves. Unfortunately as I see it, most of the people whining about male loneliness (does not mean that it is not real, it's very real…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 09:48 PM
3

Lack of sexual validation is my most prominent guess. Because naturally women have much more SMV, and because of that, most of the time, they don't need to prove that they are a good sexual candidate. Men, on the other hand, need to prove that they are a good sexual candidate via various methods, basically they need to be picked by a woman they are attracted to (or not, i will not elaborate). Men have much more selection pressure on them. And that pressure is the culprit of why men crave sexual …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 09:48 PM
5

Society can't fix dating. No one can fix dating. Because dating is not a societal thing in the first place. It's a marketplace, there is supply and there is demand. It's all that is. Stop with the nice guy and bad guy bs. If you look at it from a different perspective, you'll see how stupid that it sounds. Dating you talk about (basically the mate selection process) is totally between the two people. Two people who are, that's right, dating. There are no nooks and crannies. If you like the perso…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/24 07:36 PM
2

Agreed. I tried to understand why male loneliness became an issue and one of the conclusions I came to is we have become so individualized that we forget our own spaces. What do I mean by that? Basically in previous times, in rural life, you have a limited amount of people living in villages, and these communities were tight-knit, everybody knew each other, and they would help each other to ensure the communities help. Males of the village knew each other, and they created a strong bond within. …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 05:42 AM
2

Understood. Well, in that case, I would recommend you to break that thought. How can you do that? First, understand that touching is not inherently bad, let alone sex. Try to embrace it and understand that your mom lied to you. Then I would advise you to start touching. Not exclusively sexual. I would recommend you to get more touchy with the people around you. Shake hands with people, do lots of fist bumps (as you already do, haha), hug more people, rest your hand on your friend's shoulder whil…
/r/seduction11/11/24 11:43 PM
2

You simply may not be a touchy person. Or simply not feeling enough trust to touch or be touched. If you are too aware of and careful about your personal space, it may be hard for you to just let people inside it. Or maybe sometimes you are aware about other people's personal space. Meaning that you also may not want to breach their personal space, which is understandable, but is also a burden when it comes to your issue. Are you a person who is protective of their personal space too much, and t…
/r/seduction11/11/24 11:32 PM
3

18-25 basically is the peak for female sexual attractiveness, but that doesn't mean that older is worse for dating. In fact, it may be better. For example, because of the sexual demand most of the girls have during those ages, they may get a bloated idea of themselves, which mostly causes a narcissistic personality. Also, most of the girls in that age range are pretty childish, and mostly do not think much when they want to do something. They also are heavily interested in dramas. If they don't …
/r/seduction02/10/24 10:58 AM
4

I think after he told her that you liked her, if she didn't get into any contact with you specifically for that, no text or call about it, it's already over. You can't attract her, because attraction happens by getting to know the person more, with a little bit of curiosity. You guys have already known each other for a long time, the chance of attraction is nearly zero. Also dating your former best friend's ex causes unnecessary drama, and mostly doesn't work at the end. She sounds like a good p…
/r/seduction23/09/24 02:14 PM
1

"I am u/wixenus, and I approve this message"
/r/seduction23/09/24 01:28 PM
1

Exactly!
/r/seduction16/09/24 03:43 PM
7

Of course. I am not looking for anything casual, however sexual attraction, and sexual persuasion, if done correctly, works wonders. I don't know the hook-up part, because again, I am not looking for anything casual, maybe you don't need to hook-up after the first date always, however active sexual hints, from time to time, will eventually pave the way for it. Because, as far as I've seen, women are seducted by the idea of sex, you just need to plant the seeds the right way, and it will automati…
/r/seduction15/09/24 06:03 PM
0

Yes. Any question?
/r/seduction14/07/24 07:07 PM
3

Probably just my morbid obesity, otherwise I think I'm all good. I got confidence, I got charisma, I improved my social skills a lot, the only thing that probably holds me back is that.
/r/seduction30/06/24 02:37 AM
1

Not cold calling, sorry. I meant the previously close friends I lost contact with. It's not like calling out of the blue but more like a request for reconnecting. Try to reminisce about the old times kinda. What do you mean about the "not responding" part? I understand that you know you are getting signals, but my initial assumption is that you don't have the desire to approach them or something? I would totally appreciate it if you would expand on that. (I am trying a sales career, got any tips…
/r/seduction30/05/24 01:22 PM
0

Find it. Try to do new things in life, go outside, try to get out of your comfort zone, meet new people, talk to them, try to understand what you like, try to understand what you dislike. It's too early for you to worry about dating. For a healthy relationship with yourself and others, find out who you are first. My best tip for you would be getting a notebook and note what did you do that week that is out of your routine, what did you try and did you like it, which part of it did you like or di…
/r/seduction30/05/24 10:58 AM
16

Find their other social media and approach from there. People only use LinkedIn for business purposes. Not a great look.
/r/seduction30/05/24 09:12 AM
3

I cannot say I fully made it, but as a non-confident person turned confident, I believe I can give some insights. First of all, it is important if you're able to socialize with strangers. I wasn't, so I started by fixing that first. I started to fake it around that time. Because I also was a natural roleplayer, it definitely was easier. First, I started with my friends and acquaintances, initiated conversations with some I haven't seen for months, and tried to keep the convo going. And after tha…
/r/seduction30/05/24 07:47 AM
1

If OLD, very much so. if in-person, not so much. While in-person, it is much more important to keep the convo fun and going.
/r/seduction27/05/24 11:07 PM
1

Exactly the type of women I wanted to attract. Great post.
/r/seduction07/05/24 11:09 PM
3

W post. I believe most of the time women want to chase you if they are attracted to you, and you doing the chasing for them takes away the chance of them chasing you, which I believe is an important step for creating sexual tension. Women tend to get more excited for a guy if they actively chase him.
/r/seduction05/04/24 02:35 AM
3

I'm not a woman, but if I had to guess, I would say yes, because I think that tells her that you are attracted to her specifically, not to a feature of her. At least, I would feel the same if someone called me by my name.
/r/seduction04/04/24 03:23 PM
5

Being weak is not toxic. But having no boundaries or dealbreakers is.
/r/seduction13/03/24 09:58 AM
59

Toxic people attract toxic people, I always say.
/r/seduction12/03/24 01:00 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter