wntkno2 Archive

TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	A Cold War Fought By Women: How repression mostly attributed to men is actually perpetuated by female peers Here's another piece of research: "Women shun, isolate sexually promiscuous peers: study. Females don’t want to be friends with women who have had numerous lovers, regardless of their own sexual past, according to new research from Cornell University" http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/women-shun-promiscuous-peers-study-article-1.1365570 The slut-shaming walks are aimed at changing men's attitudes and blamed on patriarchy but it seems more a problem that comes from women.	/r/MensRights	01/12/13 10:40 PM
1	Wikipedia's lack of Impartiality and Feminist Agenda I have lots of things going on in my life. I don't have the time to be a Wiki editor, edit lots of other Wiki articles before I'm allowed be involved with editing Wiki pages to do with Men's Rights, Masculism, etc. Atheists believe there isn't a god, while there are those who believe in God; Wiki somehow manages to list both views even though one view must be incorrect.	/r/MensRights	24/07/12 11:42 AM
0	Wikipedia's lack of Impartiality and Feminist Agenda Lots of people believe lots of things. For example, religions have all sorts of beliefs. I'm don't know enough about Wikipedia to give any sort of definitive view but it seems it should be possible to have say a detailed Masculism page without necessarily checking if all claims have full "proof". Sometimes different people believe opposite things so one must be wrong. Does Wikipedia check that this doesn't happen on their other pages? I very much doubt it.	/r/MensRights	24/07/12 12:09 AM
3	Wikipedia's lack of Impartiality and Feminist Agenda This page http://jezebel.com/5850903/mens-rights-fight-breaks-out-on-wikipedia (from Oct 2011), (admittedly written by a feminist so not unbiased), also gives possible background information/reasons as to why Wikipedia may behave as it does to pages associated with Men's Rights (it's concerned it could be criticised as having a male bias as more of its editors are male, etc.). I don't have time to compare with the last two links in amido's post - probably best to read them first.	/r/MensRights	23/07/12 02:18 AM
2	Wikipedia's lack of Impartiality and Feminist Agenda The masculism page was decimated. It used to be a useful page to direct people to. Here's an archive from last year: http://web.archive.org/web/20110717225630/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masculism . People obviously put in a lot of time to get it to that level. Compare that to the current page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masculism. The "Criticism and response" section is almost as long as the list of Masculist concerns, which is now quite short. Also, compare the current Masculism page with t…	/r/MensRights	23/07/12 02:02 AM

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter