~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | Pick one: women lie or they don'tSo according to wikipedia they're both right, depending on what study you look at and where you are. Firmest number I could find in the article was "while researchers and prosecutors do not agree on the exact percentage of false allegations, they generally agree on a range of 2% to 10%." Oh yeah, except for her first statement that women don't lie about rape. Would ya look at that. | /r/MensRights | 05/08/17 10:40 PM |
| 10 | My school offers a Women-only Rape Defense Class. A lone girl replied-all to the entire student body and faculty to ask why men are not allowed. Major PropsWell there's lots of smaller men, too. I think it's women only because sometimes the kind of women who want a self defense course have been sexually assaulted and are distrustful of men. That's how one section of the self defense course at my university was. I was good friends with the martial arts instructor and he said it's basically the same course as the coed class, just without men taking the class. The martial art the self defense course was based on is BJJ, which was basically designed to… | /r/MensRights | 04/04/17 01:37 PM |
| – | Denmark's 29,000 Doctors Declare Circumcision of Healthy Boys an "Ethically Unacceptable" Procedure Offering no Meaningful Health BenefitsHey, thanks for the ad hominem attack at the end bro. Nice way to be a hypocrite. Basically the cirp website you referenced is a biased repository of articles that are anti circumcision. As to the rest, the aap agrees with me, and I'm sure they're a lot smarter than I am. | /r/MensRights | 22/01/17 06:26 AM |
| – | Denmark's 29,000 Doctors Declare Circumcision of Healthy Boys an "Ethically Unacceptable" Procedure Offering no Meaningful Health BenefitsI can understand the worry about possible surgical complications for what is essentially a cosmetic operation, but calling the foreskin a 'crucial part' of their genitals is a bit much and indeed is scientifically debatable. It doesn't affect sexual fertility in it's presence or absence, and data on whether sexual sensitivity changes is lacking. Well what you call "American brainwashing" I call common fucking sense. I don't care whether somebody's circumcised or not. I'm gonna have my sons circu… | /r/MensRights | 22/01/17 03:31 AM |
| – | Denmark's 29,000 Doctors Declare Circumcision of Healthy Boys an "Ethically Unacceptable" Procedure Offering no Meaningful Health BenefitsWait, people actually care if their circumcised or not? What is this, ancient Israel? | /r/MensRights | 20/01/17 10:56 PM |
| 3 | Brave 15 year old British kid gives speech disproving myths of modern feminism. His female teacher isn't pleased.http://vidmax.com/video/148014-15-year-old-British-kid-absolutely-destroys-modern-day-feminism | /r/MensRights | 12/11/16 05:05 AM |
| 7 | A male professor said this women-only study lounge is sexist and illegal. The school shut it downThis is what I understood. You can understand the word hypergamy by breaking it up. Hyper (over) and gam (marriage). Which is interesting because the word actually means a woman marrying above her social station. However, in this context we can see that it was meant to mean the concept of fighting equality by making females better or higher status than males. This is probably because of a mistaken understanding of polygamy to mean marrying more than one woman, vs polyandry which means a woman ma… | /r/MensRights | 02/08/16 06:11 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter