TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

wolf__larsen Archive

View 0 posts and 30 comments by wolf__larsen on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Right on dude. Last night I was hitting on this girl. She was pretty neutral and my approach was kinda off, however within a minute she started asking how old I was and where I was from, and I knew I now had her. I told her to guess and gave vague responses, never actually answering, which only made her more curious. I told her I'd tell her next time I saw her, and she gave me her number.
/r/TheRedPill17/06/18 12:51 PM
2

Though it's difficult to get to the original intent behind why women do this, you say that it's because "they themselves have been victims of sexual assault." Well yeah, that's probably part of it. Another part of it is showing solidarity by revealing that there is a spectrum around sexual assault, as I've read various stories acknowledging vastly different levels of severity, some being borderline, some are all-out assault. Granted many of these are ridiculous and obviously attention-garnering,…
/r/TheRedPill17/10/17 03:25 PM
1

"had they not had a right to the vote, it most likely would not have passed." 18th amendment (prohibition), 19th amendment (women right to vote). Chronology speaks for itself. I'm not absolving women of anything, the fact that prohibition passed before women had the right to vote, and was already active in many states up to 75 years before the 18th amendment shows how much these laws were passed by men. I also acknowledged that the Temperance Movement played a role in this. Again, not absolving …
/r/TheRedPill12/10/17 09:31 PM
1

"I'm done with this feminist nonsense. Good day." - Indication of a radical is one who ascribes centrists to the "other side." I've not brought any feminist rhetoric into the conversation, just historical facts. Blame the women for prohibition? Many states had passed state prohibition by the time of the Civil War. You honestly think women had that much sway in the mid 19th century? No, it was mostly religious idealism, and again a response to rampant alcoholism. No one can logically defend prohi…
/r/TheRedPill12/10/17 03:25 PM
1

I'm not talking about pre-revolution times and I understand where the phrase "taxation without representation" came from. Let's focus on the time period we were discussing originally, largely the time prior to women getting the right to vote, late 19th and early 20th century. At this time women are becoming more independent, beginning to get jobs at a much more rapid rate and live on their own. This independence of women, culminated in the Temperance Movement, was largely due to the disrepair th…
/r/TheRedPill12/10/17 01:06 AM
1

Taxation without representation originated as you said, but has lived on to be a motto for how democratic political systems work. I’ll help you focus, we were talking about whether or not being unable to vote in a democratic country is oppression. I have yet to be convinced by any of you that being stripped of this right is not oppression.
/r/TheRedPill11/10/17 03:25 AM
6

Pointing out reality is not by default making excuses. If you want to make that case you will have to do better than that. Try me.
/r/TheRedPill10/10/17 11:44 PM
3

"She can't appreciate you the way you appreciate her because she didn't fight a perpetual war every day of her life just to earn the privilege to ride with you; you were just the next car to pull up when her last car had a flat tire." Good post but this is real simplified, there are plenty reasons why a woman would appreciate a man. For example a woman may appreciate the first man who shows her sincere kindness, or helps her to better understand herself. Just because women have an abundance of c…
/r/TheRedPill10/10/17 09:52 PM
0

Ha, logic is "concern trolling" on this thread? If you're not willing to test the flexibility of your ideology then don't subscribe to one.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/17 03:09 AM
0

First of, we are not talking about now, we are talking about history. You are the one who brought up the idea that "women were not oppressed", I brought up the fact that not allowing someone in a democracy to vote is oppression. Done. As for the rest of what you just posted, there is truth to all of that, but you are ignoring the point I brought up. Beyond getting your history wrong, and then moving right along to the beliefs you already hold as if history doesn't matter, it also concerns me tha…
/r/TheRedPill06/10/17 08:03 PM
0

If by "bluepill cuck" you mean critically thinking about things instead of a non-intellectual homo-anti woman bandwagon, sure then. You really got me at "not allowing somebody to vote is nowhere near oppression, nor does it give "control over him/her," quite the logical argument. If you are paying taxes in a society, and unable to vote, that society is oppressing you. I included a definition in my original post for oppression, look back because I clearly need to walk you through this. Living in …
/r/TheRedPill06/10/17 07:59 PM
2

1870, non-white men and freed slaves are guaranteed the right to vote. This is 50 years before women were able to vote FYI. Besides the point though, how does that prove my point wrong? It only proves that women AND non-landowning men and minorities were ALL oppressed. Do you understand how a democracy works? It is pretty simple. Everyone has the right to vote, because your vote is your worth in society. This doesn't seem like a big deal now, with lazy millennials not caring about political offi…
/r/TheRedPill06/10/17 07:48 PM
3

You are an idiot, because my full sentence is "Your historically blind, reductionist approach towards women is something that I cannot stand in this subreddit," which is not incorrect use of the word "your." "You're" means you are, while "your" is used for ownership. I am saying it is HIS "historically blind, reductionist approach," ownership. This is why it's too bad most men are discouraged from reading, thanks to feminist takeovers of the public school system, we get people like you who blind…
/r/TheRedPill06/10/17 07:42 PM
2

Reminds me of this Bill Hicks revelation. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_1VmC_P2Nc
/r/TheRedPill06/10/17 01:18 AM
-5

"Women were not oppressed - they chose en-masse to marry in order to guarantee male support while they spent decades raising children - a necessity 100 years ago. More men died in pits, farming accidents and wars than women did during childbirth. Men put more into the marriage than women did. Women got lifetime support. Women were not oppressed - they exchanged their reproductive value for male support value." Ridiculous, this is shit on this subreddit I can't stand. Definition of oppression, "u…
/r/TheRedPill06/10/17 01:16 AM
1

Did you miss the part where he said he is a paranoid schizophrenic? You are clearly uncomfortable with that, just trying to dismiss it with your social darwinism nonsense. Life advice: you can learn a lot from people who have challenges that are probably vastly different from yours.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/17 01:03 PM
3

Nice man, thanks for sharing. The painting is a powerful reminder.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/17 12:53 PM
2

I totally understand doing things for yourself, just was wondering if you were being upfront with about it her or not. I'm in an open relationship and it feels really good to not feel like I'm hiding anything from her.
/r/TheRedPill27/09/17 03:58 PM
2

New to this sub, done quite a bit of the readings, but are you transparent with your LTR about these other girls? Not sure if TRP is about deceit or breaking trust with someone you have valued for many years.
/r/TheRedPill27/09/17 02:20 PM
1

Damn man "I better not be," how alpha of you to make that threat. I understand that one of the main points of this sub is "It is too easy to blame feminism for our troubles," yet instead of applying logical critical thinking skills towards the relationships with men and women, a good amount of you spout off angsty sexist rhetoric about the nature of the female sex with absolutely no sources.
/r/TheRedPill27/09/17 02:12 PM
3

Good for you man. I remember when I started going on without drinking. I eventually got to a point where I was very reserved with my energy and words, it was a sort of clear cut power that I had and could take with me into intoxicated environments. I was confident in ways I never was while drinking, and was actually more fun to be around. Keep it up man, trust your clarity.
/r/TheRedPill25/09/17 03:54 PM
1

I made an assumption about you based on my personal belief that my integrity is shaken when I engage in an intimate act with someone I despise, but I see that's not the case for you. So the subreddit is about power, I guess I was implying that perhaps he gained more power from this interaction than you guys are giving credit for. For example I feel extremely powerful when I control my sexual desires. Though I will say that he'd probably have more power if he got her number, even if he never thou…
/r/TheRedPill25/09/17 03:39 PM
4

I didn't use "our" in the first place, you did. I speak for myself, and for the importance of scientific observation set apart from emotional reactions.
/r/TheRedPill25/09/17 03:31 PM
1

By "our" you mean the other people with mommy issues who subscribe to ideology without evidence?
/r/TheRedPill25/09/17 03:52 AM
0

It is possibly far from what OP was conveying, but also possibly not at all. Perhaps my interpretation is of some of the subconscious reasons why he posted what he did. He does not need to bring up the dichotomy I mentioned so long as he provides the resources for it, for he may just lack the language or mental mapping to reach my conclusion. I'd say you are either trying really hard to prove that you enjoy hate-fucking people (we are entirely evolved to be social creatures and often desire the …
/r/TheRedPill25/09/17 03:50 AM
1

Bro you lost me at "their pussy is fine tuned to the Stone Age," seriously how can you pass off shit like this as logic? If you're going to make sexist statements about vaginas, at least bring some sources into the debate.
/r/TheRedPill24/09/17 05:13 AM
2

Let me know how this "fight fire with fire" strategy works in the long run brother.
/r/TheRedPill24/09/17 04:59 AM
0

Is this subreddit about being an asshole? Seriously, pointing out an inferiority that probably does exist because they are flaunting their ass is such child-level shit man.
/r/TheRedPill24/09/17 04:59 AM
4

You're being very reductionist. Are you saying it's not logical for a man to get a boner over a nice ass, while at the same time being repulsed by some valley girl vocal fry shit? Assuming that is fair, you might again mention the fact that he made this post thus shows that he cares? I for one think it is absolutely fascinating to have two extremes battling in your psyche: feeling the urge to fuck that ass, while at the same time having absolutely no respect for it. It's the complete opposite of…
/r/TheRedPill24/09/17 04:55 AM
2

I'm totally with you man, 27 and witnessing the change amongst my peers while I refuse to settle down. Though I'd like to think that you can still have "the chase" in a committed relationship, e.g., someone who challenges you or drives you crazy in a good way, I think for some people the satisfaction of the chase needs to come from work. Not sure what you do, but maybe you need to be applying this pattern with women to your work, keep going after things and setting further goals.
/r/TheRedPill22/09/17 03:30 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter