TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

wolfofthewest_ Archive

View 0 posts and 127 comments by wolfofthewest_ on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

Congratulations, you pass Women's Studies!
/r/MensRights21/03/15 02:52 AM
–

What I find hilarious is the huge number of feminists who think its empowering for women to make pornography, but misogynistic for men to enjoy it.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 12:04 AM
–

More importantly, we have to be aware that women "who get in men's way" don't experience violence at nearly the rate men do because of the general prohibition on violence against women. So the random violence directed at men is often, in fact, gendered violence -- while it may not be directed at them because they are male, they are not spared from it because they are male.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 04:01 AM
15

Cool, feminists found a way to ridiculously inflate the number of women subjected to FGM. /s I dated a girl with a clit ring for awhile. It took like maybe a minute of oral before she would orgasm. It was like oral set on easy.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 02:52 AM
13

Jeremy Bentham, the Enlightenment philosopher who inspired Jefferson's conception of basic rights, was a proponent of abolishing slavery, granting equal rights to women, and the decriminalization of homosexuality. He also thought animals should have limited rights. Progressives haven't invented shit in nearly 200 years. So, okay, maybe I shouldn't have said "the Founding Fathers" -- but certainly the most progressive amongst them did, most importantly Jefferson -- who recognize the political rea…
/r/MensRights17/03/15 04:22 AM
–

Emma Watson really needs to talk to WOMEN and tell them what to do, because her advice for men is pointless and insulting. Men will feel more comfortable letting women pay the check when women don't act offended and insulted when men don't pay, or worse, when men let them pay. Emma should tell women to stop playing mind games with the paycheck and get used to paying their own way. 2) Believing in equality does not make you a feminist. The Founding Fathers believed in equality before feminism was…
/r/MensRights17/03/15 01:22 AM
7

Also, where do feminists get this bizarre idea that you can change sexual mores by only addressing men? Look, if you're going to teach men that this is the only way to have sex without it being rape, then you have to tell women they can only have sex with men who act like this. It doesn't matter what turns women on. Like say a woman likes a guy who is really forward, and doesn't want to have to say yes because she wants to feel "taken." She doesn't want to ask for sex, she wants to hint at it an…
/r/MensRights14/03/15 07:44 AM
1

The really and truly crazy part is you're supposed to do this every single time you have sex.
/r/MensRights14/03/15 07:31 AM
1

What's interesting to me is that this entire idea hinges on a very sexist assumption: That the NKV will not shoot unarmed women. I mean, the North/South Korea conflict really has fuckall to do with women's rights, it's totally a human rights issue, but okay, so it's feminist doing something productive that has nothing to do with feminism. But they still only think they can get away with this because they are women. Just can't shake those gender roles.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 11:16 PM
0

This was my experience when I lived in Seattle, but now I live in a very rural area and I never see them anymore.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 07:03 AM
2

But seriously. Banning circumcision? No. Banning circumcision for children? Yes. When people support banning circumcision, they mean "for children."
/r/MensRights11/03/15 04:39 AM
2

None of us mind, in fact most of us prefer it. But you've got nothing to compare it against, so your preference is meaningless. You are the blind men in the cave who have only ever seen shadows.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 04:30 AM
–

Clitoraid? Well, clearly nobody market tested that name.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 04:45 PM
1

I really don't understand how someone could write something like this without realizing how very ridiculous what they are suggesting is.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 05:22 PM
–

It's not just "explaining" -- it's explaining when the person you're explaining it to knows more about the subject than you do. The term "mansplaining" was originally coined by a female author who couldn't get an edge in wordwise when confronted by a man bound and determined to explain a book's findings to her...unaware he was talking about her book. The problem is that "mansplaining" makes it sound like only men do it, but women do that shit all the time. Everyone does. Being a self-absorbed kn…
/r/MensRights04/03/15 11:53 PM
–

That chick wouldn't survive one session in my group. She'd say "I don't want to go on a feminist digression here..." and I would say "I don't want that either, so don't do it." Then she would go on her feminist digression and I would point to the door and say "You can leave now."
/r/MensRights03/03/15 07:14 PM
3

The men who have low IQ are invisible in prison. FTFY
/r/MensRights01/03/15 07:50 PM
2

Holy crap, that's from five years ago.
/r/MensRights21/02/15 09:27 AM
–

". . . more people falsely report themselves dead each year than falsely report rapes." This is obviously true. I mean, as long as you count people saying "I died laughing" as reporting themselves dead.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 09:03 PM
1

So then, if we want to be all "utility and equality and shit" up in dis bitch, places that have more male than female patrons, they should have a male only bathroom, and a male or female bathroom? Yeah, that would follow logically. Of course, feminists would whine about it like the little bitches they are. I'm a little concerned that some people in this forum seem to want MRAs to whine about Jo-Ann's doing this, which would be disappointing. When Men's Rights becomes Bizarro Feminism I have trou…
/r/MensRights15/02/15 06:40 PM
–

Furthermore, only a small fraction of the female population according to polls identify as feminists and an even smaller fraction are actually practising feminists. In terms of men, the polls are even more unkind to feminism. 26% of Americans identify as evangelical Christians. 23% of Americans identify as Catholics. 20% of Americans identify as feminists. We are dealing with a movement that relies heavily on the government, control of the mainstream media and a current kelptocractic social syst…
/r/MensRights15/02/15 06:36 PM
1

Sure, but I think you're approaching this all the wrong way. Imagine you open a business. You have two bathrooms, a men's room and a women's room. Your clientele is 95% female. There is often a line outside the women's room, and the men's room goes unused by anyone for days at a time. Seeing this, you're more likely to think "I should make the men's room unisex to handle the overflow." Because you're not thinking "gender equality" you're thinking "efficiency."
/r/MensRights15/02/15 06:24 PM
–

If some sort of perfect gender equality is the goal, then yes. But that's not really the goal. The goal is to have an extra women's bathroom and make more efficient use of the essentially wasted space of the men's bathroom. EDIT: I can't even begin to imagine why this is so downvoted. I can't even fathom what is going though the mind of people who find anything offensive or upsetting in what I said. It just boggles the mind.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 06:42 AM
–

Your mom kind of has a point. I go to Jo-Ann's occasionally for hobby supplies (it's 55 miles to the nearest Hobby Lobby), and I don't think I've ever seen another dude shopping there. Even when it's pretty busy I'm the only guy there. I mean, if they just have two single-user bathrooms, it kind of makes sense to have one of them be unisex rather than dedicated to men when the most likely scenario is a second woman needing bathroom access.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 03:53 AM
0

Well, when I think of natural law, I think of the law of the jungle. That is not what natural law means. Are you really trying to say their is no law of the jungle. That is to say, no law of survival? No, I'm saying there is no metaphysical set of laws guiding social reality that supercede the legal fictions created and enforced by the state. The position you're talking is much closer to my position than a natural law position. Natural law arguments assert that there is a set of metaphysical law…
/r/MensRights15/02/15 03:40 AM
1

I can't tell if you're arguing against me or making my point for me.
/r/MensRights14/02/15 11:09 PM
0

Yeah, no connection at all. Not like Babylonian women had the vote or anything. Oh, wait, they did. ...Babylon was a democracy now? I'm seriously going to need a citation for that. A good one too, not some blog post. I mean it exactly as it is intended: women being granted Men's rights without Men's responsibilities. That is stupid, and I reject your definition. That is not what feminism means. Feminism is not any philosophy or worldview that includes a concept of equality of the sexes. Feminism…
/r/MensRights14/02/15 11:04 PM
–

So when you say feminism has come and gone in the past, you are using an expansive definition of feminism that has no actual connection to reality. Only morons think that we have somehow "evolved" past it magically in the last few hundred years. No, listen dummy: Natural law does not exist. It has never existed. It will never exist. Natural law is a 100% bullshit idea that has no basis in reality. Natural law is spurious nonsense, always has been, always will be. I am not saying we evolved past …
/r/MensRights14/02/15 10:37 PM
1

So is masculinism a real thing now? Its a word that can be used to describe the ideology being developed within the men's movement. I'm not sure I'd say it's a "real thing," in much the same way I wouldn't call a gestating fetus a "baby." But its in a process of becoming a real thing.
/r/MensRights14/02/15 08:09 PM
–

The Sumerians are the only ones you've named I'd grant you, and I'm 100% positive I could find someone who worships Ishtar.
/r/MensRights14/02/15 08:07 PM
–

Care to clarify which society you're talking about? Because I'm pretty good at my world history, but I can't even begin to imagine what you're talking about. Plus you said natural law, which suggests you have no idea what you're talking about, since only morons believe in "natural law." Seriously, is it the 19th century? No? Then shut up about "natural law" unless you want to sound dumb.
/r/MensRights14/02/15 06:00 PM
–

Name one religion that has vanished.
/r/MensRights14/02/15 05:58 PM
–

Feminism will never go away, no more so than Christianity. It will, eventually, be balanced out by masculinism. Men will eventually get tired of this shit in large enough numbers that people won't be able to dismiss it anymore and things will change. But there are always going to be feminists from here on out. Fuck, there are still Zoroastrians. Religions never die.
/r/MensRights14/02/15 10:46 AM
3

I don't know... Tits would give me something to focus my attention on other than the spitting, cursing, swearing, etc. So it would definitely be less worse than the exact same protest but they're all wearing shirts.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 08:03 PM
14

I was watching this video of hundreds of topless women shoving their tits in these men faces as protest, and all I could think is "Wow, feminist really don't get men at all."
/r/MensRights13/02/15 06:08 PM
9

Jessica Valenti tries to justify her [hateful opinions] with a rationale that doesn't hold water It must be a day ending in y.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 10:14 PM
0

Or, did you not post that? Did you not suggest I might have a problem with sex? A hang up of some kind? Yes, and now I'm going to suggest that you are a world class idiot who is completely and utterly irrational. You mean a harmless and completely inaccurate comment that only an idiot would think I meant was the source of male shaming. And only an idiot SRS, (or Anita Sarkeesian) would ascribe that sort of intent to a business. I do hope I need not spell this out for you. I wait to be disappoint…
/r/MensRights11/02/15 08:58 PM
1

Ah, antimale shaming. Who is shaming males? You're fucking high, dude. How would you interpret this? A harmless and mostly accurate comment which only a complete fucking moron would interpret as male shaming, malice towards bars, etc. You're a fucking paranoid loon.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 08:07 PM
0

To interpret the other comments in this thread as "malice" towards bars speaks volumes about your own issues with sex.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 07:05 PM
4

Ugh, I watched the first 15 minutes or so of the first episode on Netflix and it was so slow and boring I lost interest. Very glad I did now.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 09:10 AM
2

I honestly believe that when anyone acts this way, telling people to sit down and shut up and crowing about their ability to silence others, the proper reaction is to beat the living shit out of them. We engage in argument to avoid fighting. If you won't allow argument, then you are demanding violence.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 09:08 AM
1

Patriarchy! Edit: Looks like my home state has got a bad case of the Patriarchy as well.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 12:36 AM
3

That's why I have no issues with Christina Hoff Sommers style equity feminism. If you count CHS as a feminist, then its very hard to be "anti-feminist," but CHS is really not at all representative and the vast majority of feminists do not consider her a feminist. I am generally opposed to feminism, by which I mean the mainstream of feminism as represented by Gender Studies courses, feminist bloggers, Tumblr, Gawker, Jezebel, etc.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 02:55 AM
-1

It's shit like this that makes me question the wisdom of dudes who go the Russian mail-order bride route. The other story on the front page, about the Chinese dude who had to wear a sign and beg forgiveness for not handing over his entire paycheck, that makes me question the wisdom of dudes who go the Chinese mail-order bride route. Dust off and MGTOW them from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 08:01 AM
11

I really don't know how men (and women!) are supposed to function in a world where a few months after breaking up with a girl she can decide that a consensual sexual encounter was rape, and that all of her post-rape flirtation and niceness was motivated by rape-fear, and she gets to define rape as whatever the hell she wants. They are really doing it, they are really finally making heterosexual intercourse a crime. And then they say we live in a patriarchy. It's days like this I just feel like I…
/r/MensRights06/02/15 07:58 AM
1

I don't care what bathroom you use. Unlike TERFs, I don't think you want access to restrooms because you are planning to rape anyone out of some inherent male propensity towards evil. I assume you need to relieve yourself. I would defend TERFs right to have events, conferences and other private gatherings from which you are excluded, just as I would defend your right to exclude them from your own events, conferences and other private gatherings. But not from any public accommodations, housing, e…
/r/MensRights06/02/15 03:10 AM
1

And I have every right to not think you are a woman. Guess you're just going to have to live with it, you know, unless you want to take away my right to think for myself and speak my mind. In which case I'll shoot you. Thus, impasse.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 03:04 AM
6

Also the idea that the only reason men could feel threatened by feminist is because of resentment over a "loss of privilege." I don't really consider men of my father (Vietnam vet) and grandfather (WW2 vet) generations to have been "privileged." Class comes with privilege, not gender. Race too, but not nearly as much as class (and racial privilege is primarily a symptom of class privilege).
/r/MensRights06/02/15 02:24 AM
2

Wikipedia seems to agree with your usage. It's certainly the usage I'm familiar with.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 02:21 AM
6

You know what I'm tired of hearing from women? "Men are the dominant culture and therefore men are the ones making the generalizations." Really?
/r/MensRights06/02/15 02:18 AM
-1

A trans woman is a woman, just not a cis woman. Sorry, I reject feminism gender theory. I see no reason to use the term "cis," it is implied in "woman." I recognize three categories of gender: man, woman, trans. If you prefer to render that as cisman, ciswoman, trans then you can feel free to read it that way.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 02:03 AM
-1

Go tell Alzheimer (which is a neurological problem) sufferers that what they experience is "all in their mind" which in your meaning probably means "made up of whole cloth" and that they can just stop pretending they forget their relatives, what they were doing, etc, and man up. You're literally putting words in my mouth. I never said it "all in their mind." I never said anything remotely resembling that. If anyone has made that argument, it's you -- you're the one arguing that identity is entir…
/r/MensRights06/02/15 01:22 AM
0

Alright, so what does it mean then? How do we differentiate be Gary Matthews belief that he is actually a dog, and Correctrix's belief that she is a woman? Keep in mind that we have no evidence to suggest that Gary is merely "imagining" that he is a dog, and his identity disorder may have a root physiological cause related to the brain.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 12:58 AM
0

So your identity is whatever was forced upon (ie roles, being treated x way) you before you were old enough to talk? Identity is complex, multifaceted and socially constructed. Not what you truly know about yourself in your mind (which is what fucking IDENTITY is)? No, I don't agree with that definition of identity. If I did, I would be required to agree that Gary Matthews is a dog. While I wish no ill will on Gary, and rather enjoy that people like him exist (keeps the world interesting), I do …
/r/MensRights06/02/15 12:47 AM
1

The numbers have been normalized. Unfortunately I can't find the article at the moment. Also, white people don't outnumber black people 4:1 in New York. In NYC it's a little less than 2:1. (44.6% vs 25.4%).
/r/MensRights06/02/15 12:41 AM
-2

I didn't become a woman. I was born a woman (well, a girl) with a mostly male body. No, you were born a male, possibly with a defect in the BTSc region of the brain leading to gender dysmorphia. This does not make you a woman. Women are born female and do not experience gender dysmorphia. I fixed this problem, so that I'm now a woman in a woman's body. You do not have a woman's body. You have a male body with a defective BTSc region that has been altered by medical procedures. You are not a woma…
/r/MensRights06/02/15 12:35 AM
0

So that sort of denial is just insulting. You're being completely disingenuous. When you call me a pussy and say I'm not really a man, you are implying that their is some abstract ideal of masculinity that I am failing to live up to (which is fairly ludicrous, since you don't know me at all). This is entirely different in nature than claiming that there is a definition of "man" that precludes people born women from being men. You do consider denying someone's gender to be insulting. No, I consid…
/r/MensRights05/02/15 10:46 PM
0

They believe that female socialisation is an ending horror of oppression, and that this oppression is fundamentally what it is to be a woman. Man=demon; woman=martyr....It's just silly. Yes, I agree. They're quite silly. So you wear a male disguise. You're a pussy, not a man. Your male clothing is therefore a disguise. Now you're just being insulting and disingenuous. I am not wearing a disguise, because I am not concealing my sex through my clothing. And calling me a pussy and saying I'm not re…
/r/MensRights05/02/15 09:41 PM
-1

But you didn't say anything about being raised in a certain way, etc; you said "not an actual woman" and made no argument to connect the ideas. I said I tend to agree with the TERFs, which clearly implies I agree with their arguments. And their arguments are that women are born women and socialized as girls. I believe that personal history informs and defines present identity. You probably are wearing a "man disguise" right now, as you seem to be implying that gendered clothing is the same as a …
/r/MensRights05/02/15 08:46 PM
5

Maybe we could add that they are too male as well, given men's greater likelihood and duration of conviction. Men were stopped in New York's Stop & Frisk program at a 14:1 ratio compared to women. If we assume that men and women are equally likely to be carrying contraband, like marijuana, or to have warrants out, then the sexist and discriminatory harassment of men in stops would have a tremendous negative impact on men. (By comparison, the racial disparity in stops was only 6:1.)
/r/MensRights05/02/15 06:38 PM
22

the whole mattress-carrying act also happens to be counting as her art project towards her course... which isn't suspicious or disgusting at all This is the part of the story that set of massive alarm bells in my head. I just find it really troubling that she is profiting off her alleged rape in this way. It really seems like its less about justice, and more about notoriety and attention.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 05:50 PM
-3

You're not an actual man, and are engaged in pantomime. Anyone can just make an insulting statement like that. That's a pretty weak insult, since I wasn't born female, raised as a girl, and am not now wearing a man disguise.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 05:15 PM
-11

I agree with this article 100%. It's crazy how much this mirrors my own thoughts. I even quote Robert Anton Wilson a lot. I agree with the TERFs that transsexuals are not actual women, and are engaged in pantomime. I don't hate them for it though, which is where the TERFs go wrong. But I don't think transwomen are men, per se. I'm more of a third gender sort, and on that grounds I generally respect transpeople's gender identity, even when they aren't successfully passing. Unless they're transtre…
/r/MensRights05/02/15 09:55 AM
1

The fact that this comment isn't massively upvoted is a stark condemnation of the intelligence of this subreddit. The fact that you were at 0 karma before I upvoted you just makes me sad. This is by far the most sensible, rational post in these threads.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 01:21 AM
9

Actually, I think you're barking up the wrong tree here. There really is a perception in the public that heart disease is a man's issues, and that men die of heart attacks brought on by red meat, bourbon and cigars. Heart disease is a major killer, and it doesn't gender discriminate. A lot of women are uninformed on the issue, and this awareness campaign is simply trying to combat that perception.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 08:31 PM
3

It's interesting how they can cite any examples of this rampant discrimination against women. And by interesting I mean completely unsurprising.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 06:57 AM
24

We are strong, independent men who don't need no woman. A man needs a woman like a bicycle needs a fish.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 11:43 PM
5

I like how "Cat's Cradle" is the only song about fathers and sons that will ever need to be written. How are you going to top that? Also, I think whenever anyone whines about women in corporate/political leadership being asked how they balance work and family but men are never asked that should be forced to sit and listen to Cat's Cradle on repeat until they understand that nobody asks men that because they answer is fucking obvious and really sad.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 08:21 PM
1

...in-school suspensions for referring to a classmate as black...
/r/MensRights01/02/15 11:16 PM
6

The straw that broke the camel's back was a 15 year old girl who posted a feminist rant to a livejournal community in 2003. She was ranting about sexism in advertising, and her example was a Chrysler ad from 1973. It was clear from the context of her post that she thought it was a contemporary ad -- despite the fact that the man and women in the ad were dressed in 70's clothes, with 70's hair, the ad was in black & white, and it had one of those very 70's fonts. I responded to the post and point…
/r/MensRights01/02/15 09:59 PM
26

Less men. /s
/r/MensRights01/02/15 01:10 AM
5

I can't believe this is really gaining ground as the new feminist issue. All pretense of equality has been abandoned. So anyways... Prison populations have been increasing dramatically since the late 1970s. There has been a 500% increase in prison populations overall, and while the rate for women has increased more than for men, this is primarily due to a significant increase in female crime and a criminal justice system that is approaching equality in its treatment of male and female criminals.…
/r/MensRights01/02/15 01:07 AM
1

Aw, thanks!
/r/MensRights31/01/15 06:54 PM
1

I feel like Yoda.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 06:07 AM
1

Aaaaaand you lost me. What the fuck, man? Why would I not want female coworkers? Why wouldn't any man in any field not want female coworkers? Sexual harassment in the workplace. I would have told you that if a man is frustrated with having to interact with women professionally than that's his problem and not women's. Unless, of course, the reason he is frustrated with having to interact with women professionally is that said women keep demanding he constantly modify his behavior to fit their pre…
/r/MensRights31/01/15 06:05 AM
1

Why do you feel that feminism has so enormously permeated all of culture? Because it provides a religious like narrative to post-modern secularists. It would be worth your time to develop an understanding of the concept of ressisentiment. Feminism has failed quite spectacularly at spreading much of its mindset, and not everyone has accepted it the same. 26% of Americans identify as evangelical Christians. 23% of Americans identify as Catholics. 20% of Americans identify as feminists. 11% of Amer…
/r/MensRights31/01/15 06:02 AM
1

If most feminists do not support radical feminism or are unaware that there is a significant presence in the movement, but a few very powerful feminists are radical, than is it fair to say that the whole movement is radical? Yes, in the same sense that it is fair to say that Nazism was genocidal despite the fact that many, perhaps even most, people who embraced Nazism were not in favor of genocide. No offense, but there is a very good reason I called you a "Useful Idiot" earlier. Can you provide…
/r/MensRights31/01/15 05:34 AM
2

You've clearly never handled firearms or needed to use them in a high pressure situation. You watch way too many fucking action films, dude. They aren't documentaries.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 04:45 AM
3

A guy committed suicide by cop in the alley behind my house in 2000. I didn't see it happen, I didn't get to my back porch in time -- I was in the basement when the perp ran by my window heading for the alley, then saw the cops run by, and it was over by the time I got to my back porch. The guy had a machete and had charged one of the cops with it, and the cop had to shoot him. It was really obvious which cop shot him. Kid was the same age as me, about 24. I have never seen such anguish on a per…
/r/MensRights31/01/15 04:43 AM
1

A side effect of low testosterone is depression. A side effect of depression is suicidal mentation. Thus low testosterone leads to suicide. Low testosterone leads to suicide. Lifting weights and building muscle increases testosterone. Thus lifting weights prevents suicide. "Bro, do you lift?" = "Brother, I am concerned for your mental and physical well being. Treat yourself well, and be good to yourself." Swole is love.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 04:27 AM
1

Some women are happy to be home makers. Nah, being a home maker is boring as fuck. There's not enough work to keep someone busy. That's why we got feminism, the female gender role became so easy and boring for bourgeois women they started going nuts from the dullness of it all. Gender roles need to change, but "destroying" them is falling in the radical feminist trap. That way leads to madness, anxiety, girls turning themselves into human barbie dolls, tumblr transtrenders, dudes letting Maxim t…
/r/MensRights30/01/15 06:19 AM
1

Okay, next up: Gender and Gender roles! You could not be be more wrong. I am warped, twisted, and perverted by all the shit-head men that I have dealt with that have told me I was not masculine for bullshit reasons. This thinking is what I hate. The bullshit list of man rules vigorously enforced primarily by insecure men is what I hate. Welcome to post-masculinity. Those shit-heads are insecure and rabid about enforcing gender roles because feminists have destabilized them. There's this big fuck…
/r/MensRights30/01/15 06:18 AM
2

Ah, you are in fact correct. ...now you're making it hard for me to hate you. :P Your coda at the end made me feel bad about not giving you a chance (I've been burned many, many times), so I'm going to apologize for attacking you and give you a chance. Okay, since you seem to be willing to listen and discuss this, I''m going to break this down into several responses. So you understand my position: in college my major was criminal justice and my minor was women's studies. I was a feminist until I…
/r/MensRights30/01/15 04:33 AM
1

Ah, ad hominem attacks. Truly, I have met a real intellectual, not a pretend one such as myself. A real intellectual would know that "ad hominem attacks" is a nonsensical phrase. You mean ad hominem fallacy, of which I have made none. Mocking you is not the same thing as engaging in ad hominem fallacy. Dumbass. These are not the ideas that you presented earlier. Those are exactly the ideas I presented earlier: Do you believe that all men at all levels of society benefit from the rape and abuse o…
/r/MensRights30/01/15 01:43 AM
1

Welcome to millennial culture in the San Francisco Bay Area. Oh, I see. You are a bourgeoisie pseudo-intellectual living in Berlin in 1938. I shall respond to you as such. Also, I tend to hang out in bourgeois culture and seek out people who validate my bourgeois values wherever I am. Although I have lived in many places and know many types of people because of my varied interests and hobbies, I tend to always be around bourgeois psuedo-intellectuals. Fascism is very much an bourgeois culture mo…
/r/MensRights29/01/15 10:53 PM
1

The vast majority of men that I know are feminists. The vast majority of them don't talk about feminism very much. That's also true of my female friends. If "the vast majority" the men you know are feminists, then you live in a little bubble, because only about 16% of men identify as feminist, and about 20% of women. However, I suspect you and your friends simply don't understand what feminism is. You have probably fallen into the trap of thinking that feminism is what the dictionary says it is,…
/r/MensRights29/01/15 05:27 PM
3

Every male feminist I've ever met either a) didn't understand feminism at all or b) was a complete piece of shit as a human being. I would not for a second believe they are the minority. I don't believe in "silent majorities."
/r/MensRights29/01/15 07:27 AM
12

Male feminists are the worst. This is a side effect of denying one's masculinity. Being male means being aggressive. All men who are physically healthy produce testosterone, and testosterone produces aggression. When cultivated, this aggressive quality in men is fucking amazing. It literally built the world around us. When this aggressive impulse is trained and directed, it becomes the fire in the belly that drives the explorer to push past the next mountain range, that drives the engineer to bu…
/r/MensRights28/01/15 11:54 PM
1

Positive masculinity is that which encourages the development of socially constructive self-actualization in men.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 11:41 PM
1

lol, you handled that like a champ. I would have called that guy a disingenuous fuckwit and told him to go play in traffic.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 07:47 AM
18

The strongest argument against women's historical oppression is the complete and utter lack of violent, repressive response from the state to feminist agitation. You will never find photographs of feminists being attacked with fire hoses and police dogs, unlike black civil rights activists. You will never find evidence of the state hiring armed thugs to beat and murder feminists for standing up for their rights, unlike the labor movement. You will never find a period in which the streets ran red…
/r/MensRights27/01/15 08:55 PM
5

I believe exactly zero percent of this story. There isn't any part of this that I believe is true. This is trolling.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 08:28 PM
1

I don't agree with the actions of some being used against the innocent. Oh jesus, melodramatic much? All discrimination has to go, they target women in Healthcare so they need to be unilatera... Oh, see, I look at it the exact opposite way. I think women should be paying more for health insurance.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 04:05 PM
2

Link seems broken.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 07:37 AM
16

Barbara Streisand Effect. All their effort will amount to is getting a ton of MRAs to buy this book. It's basically free advertising for him. For example, I just bought this book.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 05:47 AM
0

Yeah, that "well-established" theory has been abandoned simply because girls tend to score higher than boys now in math tests in school. I guess the million-year-old genetic difference disappeared in a few decades. It's far more likely that boy's math scores have fallen alongside all other scores because the educational system has become increasingly hostile to boys.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 11:47 PM
1

Metallica is always appropriate.
/r/MensRights24/01/15 09:42 PM
5

So, there's no war on "traditional gender roles". The war is against people who want to live one way, shaming or harming others who choose to live another way. The fundamental problem with your position is that it's completely factually wrong. In 1990 Judith Butler published Gender Trouble, the ur-text on gender deconstruction, which made the destruction of traditional gender roles its explicit purpose. But you can't destroy gender roles! Your entire understanding of gender is just ignorant. All…
/r/MensRights24/01/15 10:31 AM
11

Feminists often seem to believe that men were incapable of love before feminism. I'm pretty sure that farmers in the Nile flood plains of Egypt in 5500 BC loved their wives and children.
/r/MensRights24/01/15 10:01 AM
1

Wow I didn't know 100% of young men drive too fast and all should be punished because the behavior of a few! 100% of older men aren't excellent drivers, but we all benefit from most of them being so. Over the long run, men benefit more from this "sexism" than women do, so acting like we're being harmed is pretty silly. I wonder what the statistics say for black men and violence? That's the stupidest analogy I've heard in a while. People don't buy insurance against the possibility of violence the…
/r/MensRights24/01/15 07:00 AM
2

What makes you think it is feminist studies? That it came out of MIT and that Nancy Hopkins is associated with it. are you arguing for me? it shows that women make less in the same field. It shows that women ask for less. My god man, go home, calm down and read some stuff. Fuck off, you feminist troll.
/r/MensRights24/01/15 01:35 AM
0

FTA (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/25/science/bias-persists-against-women-of-science-a-study-says.html?_r=0) Yeah, I don't believe anything that comes out of feminist studies. Let's see the methodology, and we'll quickly find how its all lies and manipulations. When sending out a resume, exactly the same, the starting offer for women was less. We are talking exactly same experience, exactly the same education, same age, everything. Yet the resume with a woman's name got offered less. http://for…
/r/MensRights23/01/15 11:43 PM
0

Seems fair to me. Young men do drive too fast, and they do cause more serious accidents, but once the age up and mature a bit they end up being much better drivers for it. Whereas women are slow, bad drivers from the day they get their license to the day they die.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 10:43 PM
5

Yeah, I was totally blown away when I watched mr1001nights video and the researcher responded with that explanation. Who the fuck designs a study like that? Pick a number between 1 and 100? And then to only count answers less than 10? The only reason to do that is because a simple Yes/No wouldn't give you the results you want.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 08:26 PM
22

Dear god. That is positively Kafkaesque.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 08:09 PM
2

I just checked the numbers, and it's actually closer to 10:1. Which is still a huge gap, but I clearly misplaced a decimal point the last time I looked the numbers up (which was last week).
/r/MensRights23/01/15 08:00 PM
1

If that is happening, then you are basically admitting that men do in fact get paid more for the same job, and you want to keep it that way. Men do ask for and thus get raises more often than women. That doesn't mean that men are being paid more for the same job, only that men are more proactive in seeking raises. Under this same logic, how do you know right now you aren't given a raise because they could just hire a woman to replace a you? I'm self-employed. Why can't they justify denying men r…
/r/MensRights23/01/15 06:14 PM
1

I strongly suspect it will only be used by companies to justify denying men raises and lowering wages. We all know exactly what minimum wage earners make, and yet the minimum wage hasn't skyrocketed...
/r/MensRights23/01/15 05:17 PM
3

Also, we'd have to stop sending so many men to jail, or start sending a lot more women. There are 100 men in jail for every 1 woman. These are mostly low-income, poorly educated men, and their female equivalents are in the workforce, dragging the female average earnings down.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 05:07 PM
10

But that's not what causes the wage gap. I mean, I don't necessarily disagree with what you're suggesting, but to suggest it as a solution to the wage gap is so completely disingenuous that it makes me wonder what the actual goal is.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 05:06 PM
25

I had a black friend in high school whose mother was a white radical lesbian. She had anonymous sex with a series of black man in order to get pregnant with a half-black baby because she couldn't love a white baby. When she was mad at him she would scream at him about how she "let men rape her" to get pregnant and he hadn't even had the decency to be born female, and how she would have aborted him if she'd known he would be male. In high school he was really effeminate, but after we graduated he…
/r/MensRights23/01/15 06:45 AM
1

Thanks!
/r/MensRights21/01/15 09:15 PM
2

What the hell did I just watch?
/r/MensRights21/01/15 09:09 PM
6

nMother?
/r/MensRights21/01/15 08:51 PM
8

I'm glad that people are starting to wake up to how bullshit that statistic is, and I'm really glad the president is no longer quoting it.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 08:59 AM
3

I think he read this line: But what they are subjected to are countless examples of perfectly healthy women labelled “too fat”. ...as "fat acceptance" (because it totally does sound like FA blather) and stopped reading. I had the same reaction, but kept reading and realized what you were getting at.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 10:54 PM
12

I was reading a comment thread about this story and some cunt was trying to justify laughing at this story and mocking the dudes who were offended at her laughing. Dude she was arguing with posts a link to some story about a man who mutilated his girlfriend's genitals and his comment was like "HAH HAH!!! It's so hilarious how he shoved a red-hot branding iron up her va-jay-jay! lulz!" and chick backpedalled so hard you could have powered the Eastern seaboard. Well and truly rekt.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 07:36 AM
0

Thanks!
/r/MensRights19/01/15 11:36 PM
1

The proper response to people like this yelling at you is to point your index finger at your temple and make a swirling motion.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 06:45 AM
2

My argument really uses their own argument against them, which is why it is so effective. Except you're validating their argument by using it. It's possible to make them feel they are in a no-win position, which will make them start to rethink their worldview. The goal should never be to change their mind, only to change the minds of anyone watching. This is why painting them as people who have rationalized and politicized their issues with men is so effective -- it's also why they use this exac…
/r/MensRights18/01/15 06:19 PM
2

A far more effective tactic for dealing with feminists is to completely flip the script on them and accuse them of being a radical whose entire worldview is predicated on hatred for men, and keep hammering this one point: Only a person who is unaware of their own misandry could possibly believe the things you are saying, thus by making this argument you demonstrate that you are a misandrist. If they try to deny that misandry exist, make them defend Dworkin. They lose the second you do that, beca…
/r/MensRights18/01/15 08:49 AM
1

No son, you start playing Oppression Olympics and they win. They win because you have validated the game they are playing, you have given it legitimacy.
/r/MensRights18/01/15 08:38 AM
2

Anybody can do that kind of stuff, which is why it's not a good idea. It's not proprietary at all. No form of consulting is, doesn't mean there isn't a shitload of money to be made in consulting. Why can't companies just hire women? Usually the problem is that women are not applying, so they have to go seek out and find women and entice them to come work for them. Like headhunters in the tech industry who specialize in finding women candidates do really well, because the tech industry has a high…
/r/MensRights18/01/15 03:55 AM
4

Your title implies that he was mocked for being a male victim of abuse, when in fact he was being mocked for his pretzel logic. This is akin to a feminist saying "/r/MensRights mocks a female rape survivor" because of a comment mocking a woman who happens to also be a rape survivor for something completely unrelated to the rape.
/r/MensRights18/01/15 03:03 AM
7

I think I'm afraid I have to agree with the writer's accusation of "pretzel logic." I find it rather ludicrous to suggest that by supporting the white ribbon campaign this sports team is supporting sexist discrimination. That's totally victimization logic, and seeking after outrage.
/r/MensRights18/01/15 02:56 AM
11

Oh. Well, then it's a stupid idea. Nevermind then.
/r/MensRights18/01/15 01:13 AM
7

I actually think the idea they were floating was rather brilliant, it's just that the woman who was talking has no idea how to sell the idea and is a total cunt. But seriously, it's a great idea. If the government is mandating quotas in the construction field, and construction firms are legally obligated to have women builders as part of their staff, then there is a lot of money to be made by smart middle-men who can help those construction firms find women builders. And, of course, training wom…
/r/MensRights18/01/15 12:55 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter