TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

wolfsktaag Archive

View 10 posts and 241 comments by wolfsktaag on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

the discussion here is about 'libclub' not just twox or donald, try and keep up
/r/PussyPassDenied29/07/17 09:44 PM
1

look, another moron who thinks bob doing something 3x is exactly the same as tom doing something 50x. "but i dont see any issue, both sides are exactly the same!" this is the product of a mind too weak and scared to make a judgement on something
/r/PussyPassDenied29/07/17 09:19 PM
15

"diversity" has always been about driving white people out. she is acting perfectly in line with her role
/r/PussyPassDenied29/05/15 10:29 PM
1

you can say whatever you want on reddit***
/r/PussyPassDenied19/02/15 05:36 AM
1

and here i thought you were finished after your previous goodbye post
/r/PussyPassDenied19/02/15 05:22 AM
-2

awkward
/r/PussyPassDenied19/02/15 05:09 AM
-2

loud and clear
/r/PussyPassDenied19/02/15 05:06 AM
-2

then enlighten me with history clubs and the books youve read. what about my statement do you feel is wrong?
/r/PussyPassDenied19/02/15 05:04 AM
-1

thats good, but the enemy of my enemy isnt always right
/r/PussyPassDenied19/02/15 04:59 AM
-3

dont so easily give yourself away as someone holding only a bachelors
/r/PussyPassDenied19/02/15 04:55 AM
-1

no ones looking but you, sweety. this thread is too old for that
/r/PussyPassDenied19/02/15 04:44 AM
-5

the SJW movement is further evidence that the thousands of generations before us were in fact correct, and that women need the civilizing guidance of men in order for us all to have a functioning society what the fish thought a bicycle was actually the sun and water that built the ecosystem around her
/r/PussyPassDenied19/02/15 04:37 AM
23

she wasnt running away tho
/r/PussyPassDenied12/01/15 12:12 AM
5

i dont know, but i imagine her attack would still be considered ongoing after the first swing, so it would still be self defense on his part now, if she had punched him then immediately bolted from the area and he chased her down, yeah that probably wouldnt be self defense
/r/PussyPassDenied11/01/15 11:35 PM
6

all the decent people are leaving california in droves anyways, and have been for years
/r/MensRights05/10/14 02:44 PM
4

pot calling the kettle black really, coming from a SRS kiddy
/r/MensRights27/03/14 09:54 PM
2

im really diggin seein all these SRS tags come out in this chicks defence. it confirms all my opinions of feminists :D
/r/MensRights14/09/13 12:21 AM
6

this message brought to you by white urban leftists, the same group that invented white flight
/r/MensRights24/07/13 11:44 PM
0

'dont real' and 'feels' are used specifically to poke fun at shitredditsays, the resident radfem group on reddit you seem to be mistaking it for some sort of reddit-wide meme lingo thing, which it isnt
/r/TheRedPill17/07/13 01:57 AM
14

i cant believe the admins would actually be giving any sub shit for this, while subs like /r/shitredditsays downvote brigade all day long and the admins never bat an eye but then, the admins also banned a sub of mine for 'brigading', even tho the rules clearly stated it was not allowed. bunch of passive aggressive cunts runnin this show, i swear
/r/TheRedPill18/05/13 12:49 AM
-4

eat a dick, clown
/r/MensRights21/04/13 05:20 PM
-6

the miracles of womens suffrage
/r/MensRights21/04/13 04:00 PM
1

i read a historians blog years ago, he was going on about men being a civilizing force, and women being a destabilizing/tyrannical force. comparatively, of course. he was looking at various historical societies and trends in modern societies it was linked from fark.com (the Cool Kids Club, before reddit), and we all checked it out to laugh at the cooky history nerd who probably couldnt get laid. as i get older, he appears to have been on to something
/r/MensRights08/03/13 04:14 PM
-20

^ srs poster, btw
/r/MensRights19/02/13 12:24 AM
16

from where a persons love springs, and what can cause it to fade isnt universal, and it isnt any of your business. if someones love is 'real' or not is not for us to decide
/r/MensRights14/02/13 02:57 AM
25

if your woman lied to you about the paternity, and youve only raised this child because of a lie, you dont really have a family to begin with, so their justification for this disgrace is completely bunk
/r/MensRights14/02/13 01:57 AM
1

ive read your main blog almost daily since 2002-2003ish. keep up the great work!
/r/TheRedPill15/01/13 04:00 PM
6

the admins have been banning others for the very same behaviour of SRS for a while now. i made a post about it months ago, but it never got anywhere http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/10yf0g/on_reddit_admin_neutrality_and_feminist_extremism/ an admin or two and yishan popped into that thread, but as usual refused to make a relevant comment
/r/MensRights02/01/13 07:21 PM
-2

thatsthejoke.jpg
/r/MensRights30/12/12 01:32 AM
2

the links dont last long. SRS cries, admins/mods take them down. the last spate went up in subredditdrama/anti-srs/srsSucks
/r/MensRights27/11/12 06:40 AM
-3

you shouldve see the doxxed SRSers a while back. they ranged from hefty to 'man the harpoons'. with facial features about what youd expect from such bitter girls the only male SRSer ive seen was a chubby, bespectacled dude with snot on his lip and, you guessed it, a neckbeard
/r/MensRights27/11/12 03:02 AM
1

getting murdered at 12 when foreign raiders spilled into your lord's lands, because they didnt want you to grow up and be a threat being the local lord who has to mount up and lead your men in bloody combat against the invaders before your peasants are murdered, livestock stolen and slaughtered, and crops burned. such a privileged existence
/r/MensRights15/11/12 12:17 AM
3

http://i.imgur.com/7Onny.jpg
/r/MensRights08/11/12 12:00 AM
4

i doubt anyone cares who a SRSer from reddit sides with on this issue
/r/MensRights07/11/12 11:54 PM
1

the admins let SRS keep links up to dox for days, but are shadowbanning anyone who even hints at doxxing SRS
/r/MensRights14/10/12 09:03 PM
2

the admins dont give a fuck. in fact, VA believes one or two admins are the source of the private info leak and we've already seen the admins ban subreddits that try to counter SRS vote brigading. what do you expect from a company based in san francisco?
/r/MensRights11/10/12 03:11 AM
1

thats understood. the owners and their agents can do what they want here. the issue is whether what they do is a good idea or not
/r/MensRights06/10/12 08:09 AM
2

i imagine its just one. i seriously doubt all of them would compromise their stated goals like that. but youre definitely right, with a lack of transparency we dont even know which admin is responsible
/r/MensRights05/10/12 03:39 AM
2

no frodo, dont try to use the ring for 'good', throw it into the damn lava
/r/MensRights15/07/12 04:19 AM
2

could be. i used to post there from time to time, but ive been banned for ~ a month now
/r/seduction24/06/12 03:04 AM
2

i did, bout 5 hours ago. mods didnt approve my submission, however
/r/seduction24/06/12 12:14 AM
-3

...I call shenanigans, this smells like a false flag attack http://i.imgur.com/el8iL.png
/r/seduction23/06/12 11:49 PM
0

i browse r/all, so its possible. but i see nothing to that sub in my comment history, dont remember ever posting to that sub, didnt even know that sub existed until now, and have no idea what that show is about (besides ponies)
/r/seduction23/06/12 10:52 PM
31

i got the PM, and to my knowledge ive never posted anything about mylittleponies
/r/seduction23/06/12 09:11 PM
4

got it too. i dont post here, the PM definitely looked like some nerds got raged
/r/seduction23/06/12 08:26 PM
20

yeah, that didnt come out right
/r/MensRights30/03/12 12:17 AM
29

ive heard a number of women orgasm during rape. clearly, this means it was consensual
/r/MensRights30/03/12 12:10 AM
4

youre confused. im not advocating that teenagers, especially on the younger side of the scale, be involved in sexual relationships. i simply dont believe in wasting the publics resources in keeping your spawns hormones in check if you dont want your 15 year old son porking the desperate 40something woman down the street, you deal with it
/r/MensRights17/03/12 02:36 AM
1

obviously
/r/MensRights17/03/12 02:15 AM
1

i dont believe teenagers having sex is a problem to be fixed
/r/MensRights17/03/12 02:13 AM
1

nope
/r/MensRights17/03/12 02:06 AM
1

i think if the law comes down on one, it should come down on the other just as readily. however, i think the government should have better things to worry about than who teenagers fuck
/r/MensRights17/03/12 12:11 AM
-3

Feminism is a men's movement too youre adorable
/r/MensRights09/03/12 03:32 AM
7

i would rather this place stick to its principles of valuing open discussion, and subsequently get a bit of bad press because of the extreme elements, than see it cave because of the idiocy of an org like the southern poverty law center
/r/MensRights09/03/12 12:53 AM
-1

a most grievous wound
/r/MensRights08/03/12 11:30 PM
1

http://i.imgur.com/t9WBi.png
/r/MensRights28/02/12 07:15 PM
7

this thread was cross posted to some BDSM subreddit, and they mad
/r/MensRights07/02/12 07:08 PM
3

my pits sweated excessively for years, no matter what anti-antiperspirant i used. one day i decided to try just plain deodorant, and now my pits dont sweat at all unless im really exerting myself basically, all anti perspirants contain some form of aluminum, and it irritated my pits and made me sweat more, not less. you might be the same way
/r/seduction04/02/12 06:37 PM
4

the OP specifically spoke out against being dishonest
/r/seduction13/01/12 07:50 PM
3

not really. if no one bothered making an effort to get sex, none of us would get laid. and getting laid is in everyones interest
/r/seduction13/01/12 07:47 PM
1

it is manipulation, but manipulation isnt bad unless youre steering someone against their own interests
/r/seduction13/01/12 07:32 PM
3

i think the relevant question is 'is a 17 year old mature enough to consent to sex'. if he is, he is mature for sex with someone regardless of the partners age, whether shes 17 or 70
/r/MensRights15/12/11 07:40 PM
46

they basically just sit in their corner all day crying about straight white males, like old former klansmen sit around the nursing home complaining about niggers
/r/MensRights14/12/11 08:04 PM
15

my buddy had an amazingly similar experience. she worked her engineer job for six months then quit to get a teaching certificate. then two years of teaching later, decided teaching isnt for her and is currently unemployed
/r/MensRights13/12/11 01:23 AM
1

I've been cheated on 4 times not sure i would admit that in public
/r/MensRights07/12/11 12:39 AM
5

what you said: cheating is a big deal what you did not say: this abuse is justified what reddit read: this man deserved to get beat for cheating people need to practice reading comprehension
/r/MensRights06/12/11 09:34 PM
7

reminds me of the thing at harvard several years back. the faculty were having a special meeting to figure out why there arent more girls enrolling in math and hard sciences. no one seemed to care that there arent many men majoring in sociology or psychology
/r/MensRights26/11/11 02:11 AM
3

the issue in this thread is the double standard in applying rape law. whether having consensual sex with someone under 14 should be considered rape is a separate issue, and not the topic of nerdloc's discussion
/r/MensRights15/11/11 01:09 AM
9

if thats objectifying women, then im a loud and proud objectifier. and suddenly objectifying women doesnt seem bad at all that sure blew up in her face
/r/MensRights13/11/11 01:17 AM
11

if marriage ever becomes your goal, a virgin bride has a much lower chance of divorcing you http://socialpathology.blogspot.com/2010/09/sexual-partner-divorce-risk.html
/r/MensRights09/11/11 05:49 PM
1

i think most men would accept something like that as a compromise, however it must be noted that if she chooses to remain pregnant, it is still her choice. so its not just the child, but the pregnancy she has chosen to undertake
/r/MensRights07/11/11 09:49 PM
3

the person choosing to have a child bears that cost
/r/MensRights23/10/11 12:48 AM
5

both the man and the woman are responsible for the pregnancy. only the woman is responsible for a child being brought into the world. so i wouldnt have an issue with a man being partially financially responsible for ending the pregnancy
/r/MensRights21/10/11 06:28 PM
4

someone had a source that claimed that he was telling them to stay down (i guess until police arrived?) and only struck them when they tried to rise. sort of understandable when you have hot plates and deep friers within arms reach
/r/MensRights17/10/11 06:36 PM
2

easier, no-strings-attached sex. last time we had it this good, we hit girls with a club and drug them back to a cave
/r/MensRights05/10/11 04:35 PM
4

i know
/r/MensRights04/10/11 11:00 PM
36

translation: women have by and large rendered themselves unattractive life partners, demand that men want them, attempt to insult their manhood as a childish way of goading them im surprised the article didnt accuse us of being closeted gays with tiny penises who cant get laid
/r/MensRights04/10/11 09:46 PM
11

if i do business with someone regularly, and they are a legit business, but one day they sell me stuff they knew was stolen, but deceived me about the goods origins, could i not use 'yes, i bought stolen property but had every reason to believe it was legit' as a valid defense? it seems a person should be able to claim that defense here as well. if someone deceives you into doing something illegal, how on earth could the state show intent to break to the law
/r/MensRights03/10/11 05:20 AM
5

if this was funded with taxpayer money, i see no problem with banning it. but if it was privately funded, i believe whatever group was behind it has the right to spew whatever bullshit they want
/r/MensRights27/09/11 04:16 AM
9

theres only like 8 people that post there, everyone else has been banned. its not even relevant anymore, if it ever was
/r/MensRights22/09/11 01:26 AM
0

my correlation sense is tingling
/r/MensRights10/09/11 09:25 PM
2

yeah, my experience in twoX before i got banned, was that they are generally reasonable. generally
/r/MensRights10/09/11 06:14 AM
12

fucking walls of text everywhere in that bitch. ill just have to take your word, OP
/r/MensRights10/09/11 04:59 AM
-5

lol
/r/MensRights09/09/11 04:16 AM
3

shes upset that she was never pretty enough for a man to get an uncontrollable urge to fuck her
/r/MensRights31/08/11 09:55 PM
5

im not serious, but i read it anyway. five minutes later, my testicles shriveled and i am unable to achieve an erection
/r/seduction30/08/11 10:14 PM
2

everyones got their own line in the sand
/r/seduction19/08/11 02:38 AM
0

unless shes married its all fair game, as far as im concerned
/r/seduction19/08/11 01:47 AM
3

never call the police on your own family unless you are in fear of your life. people are fucking stupid. and traitorous
/r/MensRights03/08/11 03:19 PM
2

roissy says that could stoke the fires even more, unless the girl has low self esteem
/r/seduction02/08/11 12:02 AM
5

so many stereotypes in this story. gold digging bitch. old crusty womb that needs IVF to conceive. she divorces him and takes his kids, but apparently cant support them financially. piece of advice to men: if she isnt married by ~26, there is a damn good reason no one wanted that
/r/MensRights29/07/11 05:08 PM
25

'think of the children' has never struck me as a decent excuse to avoid justice. it doesnt stop people from going to jail for felonies, it doesnt protect people from lawsuits, it doesnt protect people from losing their job from incompetence, so why would it protect parents from being financially responsible for a fraud?
/r/MensRights26/07/11 04:53 PM
14

If the mother is forced to pay it back, its hard to imagine the child won't be disadvantaged. i suppose one could use that excuse to avoid paying rent, too
/r/MensRights26/07/11 04:49 PM
11

women only want to be seen as responsible adults when its convenient for them. otherwise, they are content to be viewed as blameless children
/r/MensRights21/07/11 03:20 PM
2

http://voxday.blogspot.com/ hes not an MRA, and his blog focuses mainly on politics and economics. but he does have some very insightful articles about women, feminism, etc fairly regularly heres some of his recent posts related to women/feminism
/r/MensRights19/07/11 08:54 PM
2

methinks that if society didnt get in the way, most men wouldnt mind porking a sexually developed 14 year old. doesnt mean they would bugger a toddler check out this 16 year old who recently married. clearly, her husband is a pedo
/r/MensRights19/07/11 08:41 PM
26

making a dead baby joke, and mocking a person who just had their baby murdered are two different things
/r/MensRights19/07/11 01:48 AM
48

if all the genders had been reversed, the hosts would have been fired that same day
/r/MensRights19/07/11 01:47 AM
-5

your mistake is going to a place created by women, for women, and expecting them to be anything other than what they are. irrational children with no sense of justice or accountability they can, to a degree, temporary suspend their child-like state of mind. usually when surrounded by men. but when grouped together, they see no sense in hiding what they are. our ancestors knew this, and acted accordingly. but our fathers and grandfathers gave up this knowledge, and it seems foreign and implausibl…
/r/MensRights18/07/11 04:19 PM
1

probably due to the ambiguous word. ive heard it used more in reference to cheating in a marriage than paternity fraud
/r/MensRights15/07/11 12:24 AM
0

but twisted headlines do. reality is sexist
/r/MensRights14/07/11 06:13 AM
1

so you think the statement in the headline that he had nothing but contempt for men who fear paternity fraud is accurate? even tho he plainly stated that he had contempt for men who would stop loving their kids if they found out they were not biologically theirs TLDR; Hugo is a giant shit stain. if hes pro feminist, im sure he is. but that isnt the headline
/r/MensRights14/07/11 05:01 AM
-7

im not defending him, but thats not what he said. he said he has nothing but contempt for men who base their love on genetics as the men he cites do the men he cited said they would cease loving their children if they discovered the children were not biologically theirs. that is what he has contempt for. stop twisting words like a woman
/r/MensRights14/07/11 01:18 AM
1

i think the biggest elephant has already been pointed out here: women hate sluts but i think there are other issues. maybe on an instinctual level, a woman knows that if she gets pregnant and has been with lots of men, no man will want to help her, believing the kid is someone elses also, girls who have gotten around have catastrophic divorce rates. so if a chick is looking to marry, her slut reputation will scare off most suitors
/r/seduction14/07/11 12:14 AM
0

http://i.imgur.com/sdXDP.gif
/r/MensRights09/07/11 11:46 PM
2

whats the context here?
/r/MensRights01/07/11 01:10 AM
53

girls do, in fact, love this behavior. but only from men they view as more valuable than themselves catch is, its hard to maintain your value when youre behaving this way
/r/seduction30/06/11 06:54 PM
3

credit default swaps often take a lot of flack for being a main contributor in the crisis. the concept was pioneered by a woman. duuh duuuuh duuuuuuuum
/r/MensRights29/06/11 05:01 PM
7

age difference rules are bullshit. if a person is mature enough to consent to sex, the age of their partner is irrelevant
/r/MensRights25/06/11 04:34 PM
4

the sweet, sweet embrace of the soul-crushing 9-5 these girls fought so hard to attain. driving down wages and life expectancies. bravo!
/r/MensRights24/06/11 01:46 AM
6

if a 13 year old is mature enough to have sex, theyre mature enough to be with a 13 year old or a 130 year old
/r/MensRights30/05/11 05:14 AM
0

true, but why try and use the law to deny her the freedom to rent to whom she chooses. legal != right
/r/MensRights28/05/11 03:52 PM
23

they should be teaching them to be very skeptical of anything that isnt corroborated by concrete evidence and objective third parties
/r/MensRights04/05/11 12:07 AM
-1

thatd be hilarious, if it was real
/r/MensRights25/04/11 04:06 PM
14

its not implied, either
/r/MensRights24/04/11 12:29 AM
13

the author wasnt saying paying for dinner justifies getting paid more
/r/MensRights24/04/11 12:25 AM
2

its become hiply ironic to use language/insults that at one time were considered the trademarks of the half wit knuckle draggers who couldnt piece together a real insult/criticism my guess is, they think they can get by with just saying 'fuck you', because they are so obviously intelligent and well informed, with such good reasons for their anger, and they are so affronted by the blinding (and oh so obvious) stupidity of their opposition, that they would be excused for using such a plain insult.…
/r/MensRights23/04/11 04:01 AM
13

chivalry was a quid pro quo; men treated women in a special way, defended their honor/lives/etc, and in exchange women were chaste monogamous dainty flowers
/r/MensRights19/04/11 07:23 PM
0

not at all. but the average man is slightly smarter than the average woman. im more or less as likely to run into a woman smarter than me as i am a woman dumber than me i wish no misfortune on you, i just hope you have become more informed. peace
/r/MensRights16/04/11 08:27 PM
1

The highest IQ in the world is held by a woman yep, but thats irrelevant to a discussion about men/women as a whole and the IQ test is mostly outdated today anyway IQ testing has always been hotly debated, but is by no means outdated. it correlates fairly well with a multitude of life factors, from health issues to job performance, to education, to financial success, to crime rates, etc
/r/MensRights16/04/11 07:25 PM
2

men also score about 5 points higher in iq testing. herp
/r/MensRights16/04/11 07:08 PM
1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroscience_and_intelligence Rushton and Ankney (2009) in a literature review write that in 28 samples using brain imaging techniques the mean brain size/g correlation was 0.40 (N = 1,389). In 59 samples using external head size measures it was 0.20 (N = 63,405). In 6 studies that corrected for that different IQ subtests measure g unequally well, the mean correlation was 0.63. Some studies have found the whole brain to be important for g while others have found the …
/r/MensRights16/04/11 06:50 PM
1

everything ive read has said that brain size and intelligence are significantly correlated in humans
/r/MensRights16/04/11 06:08 PM
3

ouch
/r/MensRights13/04/11 12:27 AM
-1

so they split the career sacrifice down the middle, so now they both make less, and are in the same boat as a household
/r/MensRights13/04/11 12:24 AM
4

im all for men falling for this shit. more chicks for me
/r/MensRights13/04/11 12:17 AM
4

whoever stacked that jury forgot that women are the prime perpetrators of slut shaming
/r/MensRights10/04/11 02:27 AM
1

and if denied a third time, I will bail. flip flopper!
/r/MensRights06/04/11 01:12 AM
-1

bye
/r/MensRights05/04/11 11:54 PM
2

http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/debate05/debate05_index.html theres some discussion on male variability, tho it deals mainly with men vs. women in academics
/r/MensRights05/04/11 11:43 PM
1

i never knew the definition of 'domestic violence' was so flimsy
/r/MensRights04/04/11 10:35 PM
3

to be fair, theyre not there to debate. they already believe the patriarchy has ruined them, and that feminism is the one truth more of their subscribers are probably MRA than feminists. let them have their echo chamber the christians had this same problem with /r/atheist. the christian subreddit, which was there to discuss their religious beliefs, news, etc was flooded with atheists looking for a debate (this is reddit after all, not exactly a stronghold for christians). i think the mods eventu…
/r/MensRights04/04/11 10:06 PM
1

clearly, IQ is a sexist tool of the patriarchy
/r/MensRights04/04/11 06:39 PM
1

the fuck is wrong with scandinavians. the cold getting to them?
/r/MensRights03/04/11 09:02 PM
5

her body, her choice, should be her responsibility
/r/MensRights29/03/11 12:22 AM
0

heh thats a two way street. they arent sexing guys, guys arent sexing them. hope they enjoy their dilodos and the company of cats
/r/MensRights17/03/11 12:38 AM
3

if oggling hot 16 year olds is wrong, i dont want to be right
/r/MensRights14/03/11 07:50 PM
1

given the research that shows equal sharing is healthy for the children, and given that the 50/50 custody would only come into to play if both parents were willing/able to care for the children, i really dont see how anyone could oppose this
/r/MensRights14/03/11 07:10 AM
1

from what little ive read of her, i like her. vox day sometimes posts about her. i also found out about roissy from voxs blog
/r/MensRights14/03/11 07:01 AM
10

if you want the child to maintain the status he had while living with the father, make the child live with the father
/r/MensRights13/03/11 01:08 AM
0

its not consent whatsoever. two people decide to have sex, but only one decides if a pregnancy will lead to a baby, and thus father/motherhood
/r/MensRights12/03/11 12:07 AM
3

you cant fix stupid
/r/MensRights10/03/11 12:59 AM
5

you dont debate feminists, dude. they are as rational as a sack of hammers. facts and reason will never win out against ingrained ideology. right from the get-go, when she busted out the claim that you equated meeting responsibilities with rape, should have been your first clue to back out you cant convince someone who refuses to think. leave the bitter cat ladies to their dildoes and barren wombs
/r/MensRights09/03/11 09:05 PM
0

male work related deaths are attributable to men choosing to work in dangerous positions. it is not a result of government-enforced discrimination work related deaths is a labor issue, not mens issue
/r/MensRights09/03/11 08:59 PM
0

its not that big of a deal with MRAs. if more women than men took those jobs, theyd be dying more often instead its a minority of MRAs that drum up about that issue, its not in the mainstream. its not an issue of government or w/e forcing men into dangerous positions. its a work safety issue, not mens rights issue. it gets brought up from time to time by opponents of MR because it is an easy target to shoot down (as it is not a MR issue, work safety). its not that popular of an issue
/r/MensRights09/03/11 08:51 PM
2

i think it doesnt matter what i say, you are obviously a rabid fanboy
/r/MensRights08/03/11 10:28 PM
2

maybe my pic is just for fun
/r/MensRights08/03/11 07:58 PM
3

i always wondered why our military was so damned good at killing people and blowing stuff up
/r/MensRights08/03/11 05:51 PM
7

publicly put forth an opinion, and people will comment on it
/r/MensRights08/03/11 07:17 AM
-2

yeak like this guy
/r/MensRights07/03/11 04:58 AM
3

i had a comment saying 'mods can delete posts?' get deleted
/r/MensRights03/03/11 05:37 PM
1

sign of impending civilization collapse #513: font snobs
/r/MensRights03/03/11 05:37 PM
2

"ignorance is bliss." no one knows that better than feminists
/r/MensRights02/03/11 11:57 PM
3

those girls swing the ban hammer awfully freely; their ability to squash dissent has gaddafi jealous /edit- errr...this was meant as a reply to the guy talking about the submission in the feminist subreddit
/r/MensRights02/03/11 11:56 PM
2

i thought it was more attributable to their attempts to stave off their population crash. they bring in immigrants, but it causes social unrest, so they imprison the dissenters doesnt seem to be a product of success
/r/MensRights28/02/11 06:05 AM
13

i cant believe they sent a man to prison for that. completely surreal. i dont want to know what that little place will be like in 10 years, at this rate
/r/MensRights28/02/11 12:59 AM
0

in my short time there, oneY felt more like a hangout for girls than men. i assumed they were all female unless they stated something to the contrary, such was the general tone i found there
/r/MensRights27/02/11 06:29 PM
-7

women need special assistance because theyre weak children
/r/MensRights27/02/11 06:27 PM
0

they also forgot to mention living in grass huts
/r/MensRights27/02/11 12:17 AM
0

the only women who cant claim sole responsibility are the very tiny minority who have absolutely no way of obtaining an abortion. for the vast majority of women, they choose to have a child, or not. holding the man responsible because he contributed to the pregnancy makes as much sense, in modern times, as holding her parents responsible for the pregnancy. after all, if they hadnt birthed her she couldnt have gone on to get pregnant, then decide to keep it, then to give birth and im talking abou…
/r/MensRights24/02/11 08:00 PM
1

pregnancy != baby
/r/MensRights24/02/11 07:52 PM
9

with the state of medical science as it is these days, no woman has a child unless she, and she alone, chooses to have one if she does choose to have one, men are forced by the state to abide by her decision
/r/MensRights24/02/11 06:01 PM
2

as far as i know, no one has a definitive answer. affluent societies also tend to have significantly higher tax rates, for example, which some believe contribute theres a ton of factors that correlate, but determining which one/s cause it has proven difficult
/r/MensRights15/02/11 03:45 AM
2

below replacement levels. theyre dying out, actually. kinda worrying, the same thing is happening in the west when you leave out immigrant births the future belongs to those who show up
/r/MensRights14/02/11 08:39 PM
13

i think that pretty much nails it. while she was young and desirable, she was enjoying the city and a good variety of cock, didnt feel like settling down with a guy now that shes out of her prime, she wonders why she cant get a good guy. its because the good guys are chasing after the 20-25 yr old girls, not 30 something washups she fails to grasp a fundamental tenant of male-female relationships: men typically have more options as they age, women fewer
/r/MensRights12/02/11 10:07 PM
1

if youre not religious, there are very few pros to marriage, and quite a bit of cons make sure to avoid accidentally getting 'married' via common law. if you think marriage is a ticket for regular sex, keep in mind it hasnt been this easy to get laid since the caveman, knock-her-in-head-with-stick days
/r/MensRights08/02/11 06:40 PM
-9

que the flood of girls saying 'well i dont do that, so it must not be a trend of any sorty'
/r/MensRights06/12/10 05:27 PM
4

i wonder, the more shit like this happens, the more appealing shiara law will look to young englishmen
/r/MensRights22/11/10 08:23 PM
2

this just in: women more often than not possess a very totalitarian streak
/r/MensRights17/11/10 01:55 AM
3

IQ testing is probably a more reliable measure; men beat women by only a few points there, but the more striking pattern is that men exhibit greater variability. more prodigies, more idiots, as a harvard psych professor put it
/r/MensRights10/11/10 04:21 AM
1

it varies from one socio-economic group to the next. the inner city ghettos most definitely are matriarchies, while the sprawling suburbs tend to be more patriarchal its the same on a global scale; show me a strongly matriarchal society, and i will show you a society living in grass huts with high crime rates
/r/MensRights08/11/10 05:58 PM
3

hypergamy
/r/MensRights08/11/10 05:49 AM
3

most men realize that by 35, a womans baby making days are over. much higher chance of birth defects at that point. not to mention, why go after 35 yr olds when you can go after hotter 25 yr olds?
/r/MensRights08/11/10 05:46 AM
-1

if you cant analyze a persons arguments on a case by case basis, you probably shouldnt be reading any social/political commentary
/r/MensRights07/11/10 06:36 PM
0

read some of his non-fiction then get back to us on that
/r/MensRights07/11/10 06:34 PM
2

ive been reading his blog for a while, hes skeptical about certain aspects of it. my understanding of his position is that he is undecided as an aside, he is most assuredly not an idiot
/r/MensRights07/11/10 06:33 PM
1

you are right, he shouldnt have to pay for the abortion either. she is fully responsible for her bodies response to sex, just as i am fully responsible if i eat at red lobster knowing im allergic to crayfish
/r/MensRights05/11/10 05:00 PM
1

holding women accountable for their decision to have a child is a different issue from how she will provide for that child
/r/MensRights05/11/10 04:59 PM
1

i have no illusions of them 'dying out'; theyve existed throughout history
/r/MensRights05/11/10 04:58 PM
0

if the mother cant get over her religious hang ups, she can lie in the bed she made the answer to 'welfare queens': end welfare
/r/MensRights05/11/10 06:56 AM
1

are you saying you believe abortion to be tantamount to murder?
/r/MensRights05/11/10 06:43 AM
0

remind me, is it not the choice of the mother that results in a child? or is there some unknown mystical force that forces her to birth?
/r/MensRights05/11/10 06:32 AM
1

more backflips trying to absolve women of the consequences of their choice? how surprising
/r/MensRights05/11/10 06:31 AM
1

im sure the serial killers that blamed society for their actions would agree with you
/r/MensRights05/11/10 06:17 AM
0

i posit that making you pay for my speeding tickets would benefit society
/r/MensRights05/11/10 06:12 AM
1

you are finished. no amount of arguing will remove the fact that a woman only has a child if she chooses to
/r/MensRights05/11/10 06:11 AM
-1

the woman chooses to have the baby, or not. much like you choose to violate the speed limit, or not in the red lobster example, the patron partakes in an activity he know will have adverse consequences for himself. he knows crayfish comes into contact with all of the food there; notices are posted on the doors, etc etc. he chooses to partake, and his body reacts in a serious way women know that sex can lead to a baby, and also choose to partake. her bodys reaction is every bit her responsibility…
/r/MensRights05/11/10 05:53 AM
-1

circular; the man is responsible because the man is believed to be responsible if im allergic to crayfish and know it, and i eat at red lobster and nearly die, should i be able to sue for damages?
/r/MensRights05/11/10 05:32 AM
1

its not complex at all. everyone knows a decision to have a child has large ramifications, but holding those responsible for the decision accountable is a very simple matter. women have been stereotyped as being highly allergic to responsibility and logic, and their insistence that they not be responsible for their decision to have a baby just reinforces this stereotype. they want the rights of adults, but the legal status of children
/r/MensRights05/11/10 05:19 AM
2

one day the courts will decide 'fairness' means only holding those responsible for a decision accountable for its results
/r/MensRights05/11/10 04:55 AM
-5

youre absolutely right; he shouldnt have to pay for the abortion, either. its her body that reacts that way to sex, its her responsibility. i wouldnt go into red lobster then flip out when the mashed potatoes are contaminated with crayfish, which i know im allergic to
/r/MensRights05/11/10 04:43 AM
2

which is why men should split the cost of abortion; they helped cause the pregnancy. if a baby results, it is purely from the mothers choice. similar to long-established contract law; if one party breaches, the other has a responsibility to limit the damages. if they let it spiral out of control, the breaching party is only responsible up to the point that the non-breaching party couldnt contain damages
/r/MensRights05/11/10 04:29 AM
3

'fairness to the child' could mean whatever i want it to mean. i could levy a 90% tax on your income, forcing you to live in a box, in order to feed the starving children of africa, in the interest of child fairness the child is a result of the womans choice, and should be her responsibility. if she can get the father/friends/family/charity to help her out, more power to her. forcing a party not privy to the decision to pay for it makes as much sense as forcing you to pay child support to my sis…
/r/MensRights05/11/10 04:28 AM
3

you are sidestepping the fact that the baby is still her choice completely, regardless of whether the pregnancy was planned or unexpected
/r/MensRights05/11/10 04:16 AM
0

poverty isnt my concern, fairness is. you seem to forget the number of men who are financially ruined for a baby they did not want, but were forced to pay for. and if the mother cant get over her religious hang ups, thats just too bad; she made her bed and can lie in it
/r/MensRights05/11/10 04:11 AM
3

not at all, the man should have to pay half of the abortion bill; the pregnancy is, after all, partially his fault you appeals of 'but taking responsibility for my decisions is hard' are falling on deaf ears, im afraid
/r/MensRights05/11/10 04:02 AM
-4

there is an entire chain of decisions that lead up to the pregnancy; decisions and choices made long before the mother was even born, to bring her to the current situation of being pregnant. the final decision is hers alone to make. what sense does it make to go back a step before that decision? why not go back two steps or three steps? why not go after her parents, since she couldnt possibly be pregnant if they hadnt birthed her in the first place? out of all the decisions made, the buck stops …
/r/MensRights05/11/10 03:55 AM
4

if the mother cannot handle the financial burden, she should do the responsible thing and abort the virtues and drawbacks of government welfare is a whole issue unto itself; given my way i would cut it as an aside, there are many couples with children in poverty, and single parents doing just fine financially
/r/MensRights05/11/10 03:44 AM
0

yes, since the choice to have the kid rests solely with her. why saddle someone else with responsibility for her decision? it would be like me making you pay for my speeding ticket
/r/MensRights05/11/10 03:41 AM
-1

youre running in circles. only the woman decides if she has a baby or not. if she has a child, its because she, and she alone, chose to do so. if she wants the baby, she carries it to term; if she doesnt, she aborts. the man is no more responsible for her decision than her friend is for introducing her to the man the only exceptions to this are the cases where she is legally kept from aborting, e.g., shes a fatty and doesnt realize shes pregnant until its too late with rights come responsibiliti…
/r/MensRights05/11/10 03:34 AM
-3

only the woman decides your logic is flawed. by your reasoning, we could hold the girls parents responsible as well, because if they hadnt created her, she couldnt have become pregnant. and her friend is responsible, for introducing her to the man, etc etc
/r/MensRights05/11/10 03:06 AM
-2

it takes two to make a pregnancy; only one to make a baby
/r/MensRights05/11/10 02:26 AM
86

i believe that since its her body, its her choice. i also believe it should be her responsibility; that is, the father should never be coerced to pay for the child that resulted from her decision to keep it
/r/MensRights04/11/10 10:43 PM
0

this is obvious to anyone who pays the least bit attention. how is a man rejected? by no sex. how is a woman rejected? by no romance from the men fucking her
/r/MensRights02/11/10 11:14 PM
2

i read something a while back that said people feel the same way about bosses; even females preferred male bosses
/r/MensRights30/10/10 06:54 PM
1

again, your difficulty understanding context is yours alone
/r/MensRights29/10/10 08:38 PM
0

if you think that when someone says the term 'women', they are about to make a comment they believe applies to 3 billion people, 99.9999% of whom theyve never met, the problem is with your understanding, not their wording
/r/MensRights29/10/10 08:13 PM
0

it is understood by every adult that whenever someone says 'women' or 'men' they dont mean every single one. in fact, this is the default interpretation unless the statement was qualified with all men
/r/MensRights29/10/10 07:58 PM
19

is this what feminism has been reduced to? crying that they can no longer deceive men into raising children that arent their own?
/r/MensRights29/10/10 07:28 PM
-2

when we say 'women' it is a given that it doesnt imply all women; any one who would interpret our statement to be applied to 3 billion people, unless specified, is a moron
/r/MensRights29/10/10 07:17 PM
0

lighten up, francis
/r/MensRights26/10/10 09:08 PM
2

thank you for your efforts, i didnt want to risk it, considering where i was at the time it came up
/r/MensRights26/10/10 04:54 AM
10

there also hasnt been a bald president since female suffrage...
/r/MensRights25/10/10 06:44 PM
4

and people wonder why men are watching less and less TV these days
/r/MensRights24/10/10 03:02 AM
1

anything can be funny. rape, murder, starvation, plague etc
/r/MensRights21/10/10 04:24 AM
-1

if some chick ever levels something like this against me, she should pray i get locked up for it. if i dont, i will ensure that they do, in fact, get raped
/r/MensRights18/10/10 04:55 PM
2

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camille_Paglia she writes columns that i come across from time to time, sometimes very interesting
/r/MensRights18/10/10 02:50 AM
2

it goes beyond just math, and into the realm of general intelligence. more idiots, more prodigies in the male population. but either way, we 'fit in' rather nicely in every society
/r/MensRights17/10/10 01:55 AM
2

i dont particularly care if women take over academia; im just tired of hearing them whine 'sexism' because there isnt a 50/50 ratio in the upper echelons of math/science/engineering/etc the ceiling isnt glass, its statistical
/r/MensRights17/10/10 01:38 AM
3

nonetheless, the ability required to get an undergrad in math is a bit removed from the ability required to secure a fields medal
/r/MensRights17/10/10 01:04 AM
3

i was plinking around the college boards site, and was looking at 2007 SAT scores. looking at the math section, there were approximately equal numbers of men and women in each score bracket, until you looked at those scoring 750+ on the math section. 2x as many boys as girls there
/r/MensRights16/10/10 05:50 PM
3

i hear women describe themselves as 'strong and independent' so often it makes my ears bleed. never mind the fact that its rarely true
/r/MensRights16/10/10 05:25 PM
4

the reason the two seem opposed is probably due to feminists being the most vocal opponents of mens rights, in my experience
/r/MensRights16/10/10 05:18 PM
3

track her down, kill her, keep the baby. it will be significantly cheaper in the long run
/r/MensRights14/10/10 11:27 PM
1

historically, this statement has been proven false time and again
/r/MensRights14/10/10 06:52 PM
1

the first years of a budding industry are always hugely more expensive than subsequent years. once the learning curve is overcome, the prices will drop and besides, even now theyre cheaper than divorce
/r/MensRights13/10/10 11:14 PM
4

possibly. but its not likely those males that fell that far below the avg test taker would even sit for the SAT. in 2007 there were nearly 2x as many people total in the highest bracket than the lowest bracket. so even if it was 50/50 instead of 53/47 that 2007 was, we're not likely to see that distribution in an SAT score sample
/r/MensRights13/10/10 10:21 PM
5

well, not in the case of the SAT. but in more general testing, like IQ testing, yes. there are 4x as many men that are 3+ std dev from the mean, in both ends
/r/MensRights13/10/10 10:05 PM
3

its more about the variance than the mean. the means could be virtually identical, but there are still 2x as many males as females in the 750+ range on the SAT math
/r/MensRights13/10/10 09:57 PM
0

unless youre very religious or something, i wouldnt marry. the problem arises with common law marriage snagging you, depending on the laws where you live if she cant accept it, it may be best if you both moved on if youre wanting to make babies with this girl, id have to recommend you marry her
/r/MensRights09/10/10 10:57 PM
2

as a more libertarian-leaning individual, i can see nothing wrong with this. the business can offer discounts to whoever it likes
/r/MensRights09/10/10 10:52 PM
1

unless you have some sort of serious religious views, i wouldnt marry the best way to deal with women you see doing these things is just to think of them as the children they are. when you understand that they cant really be expected to behave any better, its easier to accept. and in case i didnt mention it, dont marry
/r/MensRights09/10/10 10:49 PM
1

you should be able to discriminate against them all
/r/MensRights05/10/10 04:57 PM
1

if you see a statistically significant relationship between any of those factors and risk, and you ignore it, you are costing me money unnecessarily and are a terrible insurance manager isnt age a protected group in many places? have fun paying more premiums to cover all the 16 yr olds that cant be 'discriminated' against
/r/MensRights04/10/10 08:54 PM
-2

not charging higher rates in a risk pool for those who are statistically a higher risk of claiming against the pool is fucking stupid, and defeats the point of pooling risk together in the first place. if im going to let them manage my cash, they had better fucking well be charging more for those who are more likely to drain the pool and for the record, men are in more accidents, but women cause more
/r/MensRights04/10/10 05:53 PM
-6

i think murder is
/r/MensRights04/10/10 05:47 PM
13

so if i marry a girl who says she was a virgin (when she wasnt), i could have her locked up for 'rape by fraud' if i was the type of guy who wouldnt have married and slept with a non virgin. this law is gonna be awesome
/r/MensRights01/10/10 11:48 PM
2

why start out your post with 'sorry'
/r/MensRights01/10/10 11:46 PM
-4

show me a matriarchal society, and ill show you a crime infested, dirt poor society
/r/MensRights29/09/10 02:23 AM
2

article that touches on this in part, here. relevant quote: P: Checkout the marketplace. In Why g Matters (Intelligence, 24(1), 79–132), Linda Gottfredson estimates that a minimum IQ of 120 is needed to be competitive in "high-level" jobs. She cites research analyst and advertising manager as examples. The problem is that only 37% of the workforce meeting this test will be female. If, Gottfredson is correct, and a 120 IQ is a necessary condition for these jobs, g distributions will impose a soft…
/r/MensRights29/09/10 01:14 AM
11

its not surprising. non-religious men have nothing to gain from a marriage, but stand a good bit to lose if the marriage goes south. as we see fewer people practicing religion, we will see fewer marriages
/r/MensRights29/09/10 01:08 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter