wonderworkingwords Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
6	When the victims are male vs when they are female: Excellent comment. That hierarchy is a result of several decades of feminist propaganda. Is it? I mean, we had child brothels into the late 19th century.	/r/MensRights	01/08/17 12:05 AM
1	Sicko Sweden's Feminizing Boys with Genderless Schools. (This is a nation dying of the fatal "Swedish Disease) Oh look, a reactionary extremist. What a surprise.	/r/MensRights	26/07/17 10:36 PM
1	So Christopher Nolan should just alter history to make women present on the English side of the WW2 battlefield? You aren't really willing to distance yourself sufficiently from the object of the discussion to discuss it naturally, which is very feministy of you As for the flags, those are anarchist, not Antifa. Your first link shows precisely the one flat Antifa uses	/r/MensRights	26/07/17 01:53 AM
1	So Christopher Nolan should just alter history to make women present on the English side of the WW2 battlefield? Antifa is a loose collection of anti-fascist groups that believe in direct action. You said it, not me. It's the same people that march/protest socially (e.g. twitter) and otherwise that causes companies to cower in fear lest they offend the wrong people. No, it's not the same people. Antifa is broad church far left, there is everything from tankies to eco-friendly feminist mutualists in Antifa. Why do you think antifa is so religious about wearing their masks to their protests? Because Antifa h…	/r/MensRights	25/07/17 01:26 AM
-2	So Christopher Nolan should just alter history to make women present on the English side of the WW2 battlefield? So what will happen is antifa Take off the aluminium foil hat. Antifa is a loose collection of anti-fascist groups that believe in direct action. No Antifa group I know gives a shot about films (unless they happen in the context of a fascist action). and its ilk will protest major corporations who sponsor the movie directly or indirectly (like theater chains) Yes, because protesting major corporations is totally something Antifa does, and not, say, GG.	/r/MensRights	24/07/17 03:24 PM
4	Stalinist-like propaganda, 2017 You'd need to look into the theory of you are interested. The whole point of Marx (and Engels) is the analysis of economic relations and how those create the superstructure like culture or gender relations. Class is something that arises out of relations; what people do, simplistically put. Early feminism often had similar ideas. It's modern liberal feminism that puts more emphasis on what you are rather than do, and that introduces contradictions. What were we talking about again?	/r/MensRights	20/07/17 12:43 AM
14	Stalinist-like propaganda, 2017 Then in the mid-late 20th century feminists convinced us all that it was actually housewives doing unpaid labor for their husbands. Well that's not true, and it wasn't about unpaid labour for the husband, either, originally. The idea goes back to Engels' short treatise on the family under capitalism, which points out that the capitalist can only use the labour of their employee to the extent that their private obligations are fulfilled. A wife's work thus indirectly enables more extraction of la…	/r/MensRights	19/07/17 01:30 PM
1	Howard University professor guilty of sexual harassment Marxism that replaces class with gender is like a barbecue that replaces meat with cake	/r/MensRights	10/07/17 09:30 PM
1	Feminists/SJWs whine about "lack of diversity" in Dunkirk. FACEPALM! It was a mix of practicality and insane doctrine. Black people were considered lesser (and few fought for the Nazis) but within Germany there were so few they didn't really care. Funnier is the story of the Croats, which were elevated to special kinds of Slavs (arianised Slavs) for political reasons (i.e. the extreme Catholic fascist Ustaše that also liked Muslims (and Muslims were regarded as culturally and religiously strong by the Nazis also, where practical) were to rule over occupied Yugosl…	/r/MensRights	29/06/17 12:04 AM
2	Feminists/SJWs whine about "lack of diversity" in Dunkirk. FACEPALM! no African-American Waffen SS Well, African.	/r/MensRights	28/06/17 11:28 AM
1	I don't get it. What do they think makes this sub hateful? It could be because there's threads in which people suggest unironically that there are men decisions only men brains can properly make, and praise instead of criticism follows	/r/MensRights	11/06/17 12:51 AM
61	"Oh. That's okay then". what is the disadvantage of circumcision I'll leave that to others, but regardless, even if there were no disadvantages to circumcision: it's unnecessary, and done on toddlers that can not consent (or refuse to). The issue isn't the procedure of circumcision, which can be necessary in some cases, like a persistent phimosis. Parents are supposed to be the stewards of their children and make such decisions where they can't. But parents are not permitted to have unnecessary surgical operations done…	/r/MensRights	22/03/17 03:24 PM
14	Why women need a shorter working week than men 2 hours a day for seven days a week are 14 hours. In math circles that's equal ;)	/r/MensRights	07/02/17 06:18 PM
1	What the hell is going on in this sub? So I remember a time when people proudly claimed that the difference between the mrm and feminism was that the former is not an ideology, but rather unpolitical advocacy for men's rights. There were even a few leftcoms here years ago. Has this changed now? Because otherwise the ideological policing is hard to justify. Sad if so.	/r/MensRights	15/12/16 11:49 AM
2	Tenured Professor Jordan Peterson will be fired from University of Toronto if he refuses to use Gender Neutral Pronouns. University also refused to host debate on free speech if he did not use these pronouns. xpost from r/canada Singular they is historically for indeterminacy rather than neutrality. Its use to refer to known singular persons is new. That isn't to say that one can't use it differently, and Peterson has claimed that he would use it if it came to be used as such as a result of language evolution rather than policy. Generally it strikes me that hte call for personal pronouns beyond a neutral additional pronoun for people who specifically are genderqueer misunderstands their purpose; pronouns are there to re…	/r/MensRights	07/11/16 04:49 AM
0	Advertising company chairman put on leave after saying he did not think the lack of women in leadership roles "is a problem" Strom said exactly that, to the point of logical equivalence. Voltaire wrote in French. Are you going to claim that any translation, or especially two slightly different translations, make something Voltaire said so substantially different that it wasn't him that said it any more, but rather the translator? If not, then you have no point.	/r/MensRights	01/08/16 08:59 AM
-2	Advertising company chairman put on leave after saying he did not think the lack of women in leadership roles "is a problem" You can see it play out in everyday examples, such as this one That's of course begging the question. There are myriad reasons why we might want to socially police what we can and can't say to or about people. It is prudent, for example, to not allow people to talk of minority groups as vermin, because that's the first step to a genocide, as we've seen at least three times. The advertising company chairman above didn't criticise women, either, but rather institutional structures that seek to inc…	/r/MensRights	01/08/16 08:55 AM
6	Advertising company chairman put on leave after saying he did not think the lack of women in leadership roles "is a problem" That is a Kevin Strom quote. Voltaire never said that. It's about the Jews and how they secretly rule the world and are evil, as Strom is a white supremacist/Neonazi.	/r/MensRights	01/08/16 01:51 AM