TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

woodchopperak Archive

View 0 posts and 97 comments by woodchopperak on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

However, there seems to be quite a lot of actions that hurt other people intentionally or not, and to that end I support regulation. This is exactly where the idea of the tragedy of the commons comes from. We are inherently selfish. Either individually or through our tribe. There have been plenty of times in our recent history where companies operated largely outside of regulation - 1700-1900's. The exploitation of the poor and vulnerable was rampant. People complain about unions and regulations…
/r/MensRights23/10/15 07:32 AM
1

But what are liberals? Liberals are a special brand of reactionaries with a completely unrealistic and warped view of the past. They believe independent people interacting in a free market magically solves all problems. Not that different from contemporary communists with their unrealistic and warped idea of the future where free people interacting in independent communities magically solves all problems. I think you mean libertarians
/r/MensRights22/10/15 08:52 PM
1

This kid was exonerated because of a procedural issue and a violation of his due process rights, not because he was found to be innocent. He may be innocent, but he may be guilty too. This is a case of her word against his. Folks here are automatically jumping to the conclusion that this means she made it up. It sure doesn't. Here is some more information. https://sports.vice.com/en_us/article/former-utc-wrestlers-expulsion-reversed-in-sexual-assault-case
/r/MensRights12/10/15 09:41 AM
1

Here is another article with more detail. https://sports.vice.com/en_us/article/the-wrestler-and-the-rape-victim
/r/MensRights12/10/15 04:34 AM
1

"I was in the bathroom by myself and I was sick to my stomach. My body felt super, just—I don't know. It's like a fog, and just super limp and I was throwing up a lot." She remembers Mock being there in the bathroom, "slapping my face awake, trying to get me to look at him. And so I looked at him, and he was like right in my face and he was freaking out that I was unconscious and not doing okay." Morris still felt sick. https://sports.vice.com/en_us/article/the-wrestler-and-the-rape-victim
/r/MensRights12/10/15 04:34 AM
1

Doesn't sound like she puked and rallied. "I was in the bathroom by myself and I was sick to my stomach. My body felt super, just—I don't know. It's like a fog, and just super limp and I was throwing up a lot." She remembers Mock being there in the bathroom, "slapping my face awake, trying to get me to look at him. And so I looked at him, and he was like right in my face and he was freaking out that I was unconscious and not doing okay." Morris still felt sick. https://sports.vice.com/en_us/arti…
/r/MensRights12/10/15 04:32 AM
8

Ok great. I'm glad due process was restored. However, am I the only one that is disturbed that after he found her puking in a bathroom he thought this was a great time to have sex? In my extensive drinking history, I can't recall a moment that after I've ended up puking I wanted to do anything but pass the fuck out. There is something to be said about human decency, and the right decision would have been to take her home and put her to bed. Without coitus.
/r/MensRights10/10/15 11:46 AM
2

Dude, just go get a restraining order. The police can give you an automatic 72 hour restraining order without notifying her. Then go to the court house and get a 20 day ex parte.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 06:53 AM
1

That is not true. He can get an ex parte order
/r/MensRights25/08/14 06:51 AM
1

He can get a restraining order though. He can get an automatic 72 hour and then a 20 day ex parte order. I would recommend he does this.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 06:51 AM
10

That's a pretty narrow view of an "American Lesbian" and bullshit. It's like saying all gay men hate women because they only like to have sex with other men. I know lots of lesbians and I live in America and I'm pretty sure the reason they are lesbians is because they like lady parts instead of man parts not because they think all men are evil. edit: not bullshit but possibly ignorant or intentionally trying to make some sort of ad hominem attack, or the woman never said that (Who knows who she …
/r/MensRights30/12/13 10:27 AM
2

Here is a more in depth article. http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/discrimination-suit-prestigious-upper-west-side-school-article-1.1552016
/r/MensRights20/12/13 01:41 AM
-5

So I guess the shelf should file suit? I think you're stretching the meaning here.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 10:44 AM
1

The high road is better. It would've pissed them off more if they realized they had no effect on you. In some ways you still lost to them, because you relinquished your self control to their petty remarks.
/r/MensRights28/11/13 02:29 AM
12

"black women seem to be appropriating racism which they've never experienced" I guess I'm not sure I understand your statement here. What do you mean black women have never experienced racism? I think that this is false and empirically so.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 05:24 AM
2

Colored rights?
/r/MensRights16/11/13 02:48 AM
1

Look up ad hominem.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 01:06 AM
2

No they don't exist. See this wiki:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negroid From the article: "Coon's evolutionary approach was criticized on the basis that such "sorting criteria" do not (in general) produce meaningful results, and that evolutionary divergence was extremely improbable over the given time-frames." So no there is not a whole branch of science that follows this.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 01:05 AM
2

Not liking some of the comments on here is my right as much as it is others to make them. And as much as it is another persons right (I don't know if you speak this way) to say it, it is as much my right to note my opinion about their choice of words. That's how free speech works. You can say stuff but I can also say stuff. I have no censor button. I can't stop you from posting whatever comments you like. It is your freedom and choice. I'll continue to speak my mind as well. If you all don't thi…
/r/MensRights04/11/13 11:41 AM
2

Ethnicities exist in that they represent morphological and physiological differences because of selective forces. Black, white, brown, yellow these are subjective human constructs. Do I really need to say this? Africa is a large country comprised of many different cultural groups and ethnicities. To equate a black person with someone from Africa is to disregard the differences in the groups of peoples from Cape Horn to Egypt. A typical Egyptian looks quite different than someone from the Congo. …
/r/MensRights04/11/13 07:40 AM
1

Laws are meaningless without enforcement, so no they are not. We're not talking about laws we're talking about voting.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 07:22 AM
1

I'm sorry to say I see that attitude a lot, and a lot of 'bitch' this and 'cunt' that. Thank you for saying that. I thought I was alone in my general disgust with the way those words are thrown around by some people in here. Every time I say something I get a barrage of down-votes. It is almost instantaneous when a user doesn't like what someone or group of people has done. Instead of leading with a flurry of insults I think it would be better if folks here used constructive and rational argumen…
/r/MensRights04/11/13 06:15 AM
2

Sickle cell is thought to be an adaptation by folks in areas with high chances of contracting malaria. Folks with sickle cell are less likely to contract malaria. Morphological differences driven by natural selection and genetic bottlenecks are different than "white folks are better than black folks or this "race" of humans has the qualities that I deem superior, and see how advanced they are. Obviously they have superior traits to other races." Do you see my point? It was a construct based on o…
/r/MensRights04/11/13 04:55 AM
1

The enforcement of laws and voting are two different things.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 04:42 AM
2

What is a vote? A vote is force. If you're not willing or able to back said vote with the force required to enforce it, why should you get to vote? That is the exact opposite of what a vote is. I've read that one of the unique aspects of American democracy was that we have a bloodless revolution every four years. A vote is power and the many votes together represent the power of the people in the decision making process. A vote is not force. Democracy involves dialogue and an educated republic. …
/r/MensRights04/11/13 04:27 AM
2

Race is not a scientific construct. It was about 100 years ago, but has been shown to be more a factor of our own biases as humans than any objective difference. The biological species concept identifies a species as something that is reproductively isolated to its own kind. We are not reproductively isolated from humans from asia or africa. A phylogenetic species would be determined by the degree of genetic similarity within a group of organisms. Usually identified by some genetic sequences tha…
/r/MensRights04/11/13 04:24 AM
6

So you know what gender roles have been followed by humans for millions of years? I think there are so many scientists who want to talk to you. There definitely are biological roles that we have between genders, but there are cultural ideals that we impress upon children as well. These are two different things. BTW as a biologist I can tell you that social darwinism is a racist doctrine. Not a science.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 04:02 AM
6

Yes. Men get the right to vote by being subject to conscription in order to defend the results of said vote (and also by fighting and dying in the wars that gave them the vote). So conscientious objectors, physically disabled, older people should not be able to vote? This is a dangerous way to think about who is able to participate in a democracy. I also think the idea that fighting in wars has something to do with democracy or voting is incorrect. The way we organize ourselves derives our democ…
/r/MensRights04/11/13 02:33 AM
-1

At the time feminism came about, women were allowed to own property so that is distraction rather than an actual point. The term feminism wasn't coined until the 1960's. Women had to fight for the right to own property in the 1800's and the right to vote, which was given to them in the 1900's. It is in fact very relevant to the conversation. This is the historical context of feminism.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 02:26 AM
2

So you are saying that voting and owning property are inherently mens rights?
/r/MensRights04/11/13 01:16 AM
3

So feminism didn't start because women weren't allowed to vote or own property?
/r/MensRights04/11/13 12:55 AM
0

Perhaps the evidence is empirical that men have built all these things in the past, but it wasn't because women can't it's because they weren't allowed to participate. Historically, the women who have served society in other ways had there achievements overshadowed. Look up Rosalind Franklin and the DNA double helix. Bullshit thinking like this: they do, but in a female way (choosing, raising, and motivating men). ...is the reason that feminism exists. It isn't because women have to be nurturers…
/r/MensRights04/11/13 12:37 AM
-4

Agreed. I think she's full of it.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 09:11 PM
4

In her own way Angela paints a straw man about feminists. I hoped my blow-dried hair and figure-hugging dress would give her some clue as to the answer. I see marriage as more than a piece of paper, that I believe women have no place in a combat zone, and that I know my daughter won't be stereotyped for playing with dolls. I have met some beautiful stylish women that define themselves as feminists. Also I think that feminists don't have a problem with letting their daughters play with dolls, it'…
/r/MensRights01/11/13 09:10 PM
2

I think they are poking fun at the "gender pay gap" which is touted as a woman makes 75 cents to every dollar a man makes. However it is actually closer to 1:1 dollars when controlled for type of job, hours of overtime, experience, etc...
/r/MensRights29/10/13 07:34 PM
6

That is very true. My grandmother, who died at 93, had a bad heart and that was the reason the doctors gave for not fixing it. Interestingly and somewhat related to this thread, my grandfather died around 73 years due to prostate cancer.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 08:50 PM
1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
/r/MensRights15/10/13 03:52 AM
1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
/r/MensRights15/10/13 03:51 AM
0

So Mr. Troll, how is it established? When a normal person sees a phrase like 'men are better than women in certain areas' they know precisely what is being talked about and they don't dissolve into anything. It doesn't even register as something which needs responding to, it's such an established truism. Do you have some research that supports this? What "certain areas" are you talking about?
/r/MensRights15/10/13 03:47 AM
1

That does not say that all feminists hate men. Or "hate the fact that men are better than women in many areas."
/r/MensRights15/10/13 03:46 AM
1

Oh I see, you're a troll.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 03:45 AM
-2

Sure, but I think what I said was accurate. How is that not a strawman. Maybe I was wrong. What would you call it? An Apex fallacy? Where a few examples are used to characterize the whole. Maybe that's more accurate. Many of the 'women' being talked about are raving feminist loons and they deserve everything said about them. Decent women aren't usually tarred with the same brush. Many of these feminists genuinely are misandrists as they hate men, hate what men stand for and hate the fact that me…
/r/MensRights12/10/13 11:34 PM
-13

nice strawman
/r/MensRights12/10/13 04:38 PM
2

How do you know what the vast majority of muslims think? Seriously, I'm curious. Are there stats on this or just conjecture. Also if we speak of homophobia, many christian leaders in this country are in line with many clerics. edit: There are also quite a few secular countries where the majority of the population is muslim. I think more than not. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_and_secularism
/r/MensRights25/09/13 05:06 AM
1

Just a note. Fundamentalist islam is mysoginistic. Moderate islam is not. Think of what the world was like for a christian women 500 years ago or even 200 years ago. It wasn't pretty. Christianity also has its dark past and misogynistic verses in the bible. There were secular islamic countries like afghanistan before the taliban and the russians, or Iran, before during the time of mohammed mossadegh or the shah. We should never have supported a coup there.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 08:49 PM
6

So it has nothing to do with how men and women are raised or wearing short skirts. Also I've seen plenty of women in pants sit with their legs far a part and seen plenty of men sitting with their legs close together. I guess I don't buy it.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 11:05 PM
2

Actually I think that is pretty accurate. I've read a couple of studies put out by the labor department and when controlling for hours worked, type of job, overtime, etc.. women earn about 92 to 94 percent. There's an unexplained 6-8% portion of the pay gap. There are some fields where women actually make more than men. Psychotherapy was one of them. What are the others? Anyone?
/r/MensRights31/08/13 12:22 AM
3

You're a feminist, you aren't worth talking to. You know if you just fill in feminist with mrm you would sound like a feminist talking about mens rights. Really this isn't the way to move forward in the world. I am not a feminist even though I am interested in the ideas of mens rights and women's rights movements. I think they are taking different approaches to the same problems. I think women have a better standing than they did 30 years ago, and I think some of the feminist ideas are misdirect…
/r/MensRights16/08/13 11:19 PM
3

Discussion: The target is accused of having anger management issues. Whatever negative emotions he has are assumed to be unjustifiable. Examples: “You’re bitter!” “You need to get over your anger at women.” “You are so negative!” Interesting. I did not accuse you of having anger management issues, or being irrational. There was this comment you made: You'll hate it because you will be full of offices full of bitchy women, and hot women you dare not fuck because HR is run by a bitter, man hating …
/r/MensRights16/08/13 10:51 PM
3

From your comment history I see that you have some issues with women. There is no policy that punishes men for being men, but we all experience life differently. I'm guessing you had a bad experience somewhere in there with a woman in power?
/r/MensRights16/08/13 10:18 PM
5

Feminists don't hate men. This is a dishonest representation in the same sense that feminists say MRM hate women and want them all back in the kitchen. There are some feminists, radfems, who have serious man issues, but overall the point of the movement is not manhating.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 08:22 PM
-1

ARe there links to this other than through his blog?
/r/MensRights16/08/13 08:06 PM
-1

Well it's not just who earns more money, but the opportunity to be a cog in the system. For a long time, men were the ones expected to do this.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 09:24 PM
4

Yeah she is seriously mental. Look up her user name "StalkedinBoston". She has some issues.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 07:38 PM
1

No that's the reality of it. What happens after is up to the woman.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 12:37 AM
1

I am not implying that men aren't or shouldn't be interested in their own kids. I'm saying that there is a significant biological repercussion from sex for women that men don't have to consider. If a woman gets pregnant there are extra aspects that she has to deal with that a guy doesn't necessarily have to deal such as the physiological and physical changes of carrying a baby to term. I'm not saying that the man doesn't care about the baby, but sometimes this happens. If the woman gets pregnant…
/r/MensRights11/07/13 01:18 AM
0

Because it is her body. Really the woman could get an abortion and the father would never know it.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 07:23 PM
1

Perhaps a woman can't but that is apples to oranges. The physiological and physical changes that occur over nine months. The hormonal changes. That is a big difference. Men and women are both parents but only women are saddled with this experience. This is a very real risk to sex for women.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 07:19 PM
1

I agree with you about there being too many people in the world, and there should be more equality in the legal system regarding parental rights. I guess I just disagree with the idea that freedom dissolves the responsibility of a parent to a child. Even with birth control there is still a chance that a woman can get pregnant. I think if we are going to progress here maybe sexual partners really need to have serious conversations about each others ideas on abortion or keeping a child before enga…
/r/MensRights09/07/13 07:15 PM
1

How does this make me lose credibility. The woman doesn't walk away from the pregnancy if she can't have an abortion.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 07:01 PM
-3

Sorry for the brashness of my comment. It was misdirected. Why should a man be able to refuse parenthood if he consensually had sex with someone and the woman doesn't want an abortion?
/r/MensRights09/07/13 01:14 AM
-1

So the man will carry the baby to term too? And really without abortion the man is the only one who gets to walk away from this situation. edit: typo
/r/MensRights08/07/13 09:37 PM
-5

How about this for the men here. Don't stick your penis in a woman if you aren't ready for the possibility that you might get someone pregnant. There is a tremendous risk that you may become a father. If you are worried about the possibility that the woman will or will not have an abortion, ask her. Why is the woman screwed with the baby if she gets pregnant and the man doesn't want to keep it? Isn't that a little unfair? I know what comes next, "Isn't it unfair that the woman can have an aborti…
/r/MensRights08/07/13 08:09 PM
-8

How about this. Don't stick your penis in a woman if you aren't ready for the risk that you might get someone pregnant.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 07:24 PM
1

What the hell are you talking about? How does a forced paternity test compare to an abortion or pregnancy? Is this really an issue?
/r/MensRights08/07/13 07:22 PM
-3

That is comparing apples to oranges. Until men can experience carrying a baby to term we will never understand that responsibility.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 07:18 PM
5

Women still got abortions before Roe v Wade. It was far more dangerous. Maybe more get them now than before. I agree with doch doch. This is a women's issue. They have to carry the baby.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 07:16 PM
1

Ok so??? I know, what is your point?
/r/MensRights02/07/13 05:56 PM
3

Well if men get elected, ultimately they will have a say in the LAWS regarding reproductive rights.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 06:49 PM
3

ok, didn't know that
/r/MensRights28/06/13 03:00 AM
2

No trying to discount the discrimination against women, but men have lost their lives because of their sex. It's called conscription.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 07:40 PM
-1

Here are some pretty significant social developments that have occurred in the last few centuries. Women, almost globally, were given the vote Just want to point out that women in this country have the right to vote for just under 100 years. In some countries around the world it has been less than 50 years. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women's_suffrage Liberal democracy became synonymous with freedom, socialism drastically receded Also I'm not sure of the definition of socialism that you're usin…
/r/MensRights21/06/13 09:03 PM
1

Be wary of one line quotes.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 06:21 PM
2

Hmm. I was trying to point out that if you are trying to have a conversation with someone, singling them out as an irrational can be considered antagonistic. But you knew that and were intentionally being that way, so good luck. There was nothing wrong with the tone of my previous statement, I was merely pointing out something to you, which you were doing intentionally.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 04:44 PM
0

That's doilies not dollies troll. Get a dictionary.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 06:19 AM
1

Are you being sarcastic or from the manhood academy?
/r/MensRights05/06/13 06:09 AM
3

Think about this comment: Not unless you pay them, no. But this is feminists not people in general we're talking about. If you replace feminists with MRA's do you see how the tone of the argument is antagonistic?
/r/MensRights05/06/13 06:07 AM
5

To be fair, there were some universities that got in trouble recently because they were underreporting sexual assaults and rapes. Granted, I don't understand why they wouldn't just produce some data. A google search would probably provide some answers quickly. Although your analysis only shows three schools. What are some statistics for other Universities across the US. In fairness of the analysis it would be good to see what the spread of points are to make sure that the OP is not cherry pickin…
/r/MensRights05/06/13 04:18 AM
1

That is my point. You don't need symbols when paraphrasing, you normally just cite the source along with the paraphrased material. For the commenter above they simply could have said, "To paraphrase so and so, ...." It's about making the things we say more clear and avoiding the above situation where someone thought that the commenter was directly quoting the source when they were actually rewriting the statement in their own words. What if I was paraphrasing something you said and completely mi…
/r/MensRights03/06/13 06:16 PM
1

True we are not writing a book report. However, why did she use quotations at all? I'm pretty sure though, in the past year the rules of punctuation and quotation have remained pretty constant. Also if you read the preceding comments people had the idea that she was making a quote and not paraphrasing. I think that's a good enough reason not to uses quote.
/r/MensRights02/06/13 10:15 PM
1

So you got nothing?
/r/MensRights01/06/13 04:59 AM
3

Upon further review I think it is bullshit. Where are the citations? Women purchase 89% percent of the banks? What does this even mean?
/r/MensRights31/05/13 07:19 AM
3

I bet there are statistics out there. Congressional budget office? Census data? IRS? Also if women are doing the shopping for a household it would be likely that their name would be on the receipt.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 07:00 AM
1

I was really looking forward to your counterarguments.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 02:43 AM
1

What did you want me to address, that I missed the word won't? Because you really dismantled my argument with that one. Or maybe that I'm an obtuse cunt? Did someone say ad hominem? Or the fact that I have a differing opinion about workplace etiquette proves that I've never worked a hard day in my life? Oh no, wait I see the crux of your response buried in there in the middle of all that. There it is: I don't know. I have a couple. The question needs to be asked of all those women who refuse to …
/r/MensRights30/05/13 02:43 AM
-2

Wow. I feel like I'm debating a 12 year old.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 01:15 AM
-3

I don't quite understand. So you are saying that women aren't smart enough? Perhaps for a smaller woman the physical labor may be hard but what is so difficult about a developed skillset or the technical acumen? On average women are smaller than men, but there are a lot of women that are larger than many small men and stronger too (my sister being one of them). What sort of jobs do you consider hardwork? I'm guessing you work in a union based on what you're describing. So they couldn't be electr…
/r/MensRights30/05/13 12:49 AM
2

Ok. Generally though when you put something in quotations it implies that you are taking a quote. When you paraphrase something don't put quotations because you are not quoting anything but are rewriting a statement in your own words. These are pretty standard rules of punctuation and you'd probably avoid a lot of confusion following them.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 05:55 PM
12

don't use quotations if you paraphrase.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 11:55 PM
1

The tone of his comment didn't necessarily scream I want a civil discourse.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 08:05 PM
3

Really when you think about what he said it is bullshit. A guy can walk around with no shirt on without it being a big deal, but if a woman does it she's leading someone on or inviting rape? Come on.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 05:10 AM
2

Biologist here, specializing in botany/ecology. Why is majoring in biology selling out? There is nothing more beautiful than trying to understand the life on this earth in all its forms. However unless one uses that biology degree to become a doctor there's not a lot of money in it. But that's okay with me. Just a note. You should remember that many of our applicable ideas in the "real" world (I hate when people use this term) come from academia. Ideas about genetics, political policy, sexual ha…
/r/MensRights24/05/13 10:17 PM
4

No it's not, here is a link to more like it. http://oxford.tab.co.uk/2013/02/06/womcam-whiteboards-hit-rad-cam-in-radical-revolution/
/r/MensRights24/05/13 09:58 PM
1

Men only fitness facilities are called country clubs.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 05:39 AM
1

Why am I an idiot. This video is posted in the MensRights subreddit. Is it such a stretch to make that assumption?
/r/MensRights15/05/13 01:56 AM
-5

This dude is rude. How can anyone here take him seriously when he constantly makes sleazy jokes at the woman in the video? Is this seriously what mens rights advocates are about? I would've liked the video better if he would've left the sleazy comments out. That's pretty disrespectful.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 04:39 AM
-2

Bullshit
/r/MensRights11/05/13 02:36 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter