TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

worldnewsie Archive

View 2 posts and 408 comments by worldnewsie on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Has anyone found the TED Talk she mentioned? Gotta be a TEDx and not a real one.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/21 05:24 AM
1

I am Jack's complete lack of surprise at what kind of woman wrote that.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/21 01:11 AM
4

But there are cool people whose lives got wrecked by drugs and now they're losers with next to no hope of ever becoming cool again.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/21 07:50 AM
2

Maybe if women kept their legs closed or had IUDs to take responsibility for their actions they wouldn't be leeches on society.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/21 05:51 AM
1

Tell him you're actually a guy and only using that pic to pretend to be a girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/21 03:37 AM
3

The dystopia is yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/21 03:00 AM
3

What is that even in response to? I didn't say punish women collectively, just ones referred to in my original comment. That section will just grow proportionally because it would be incentivized otherwise. That won't create the utopia that you evidently want. It is more likely to create a dystopia for everyone else. The cream will rise to the top. The women fucking up that much are maladaptive for society anyway, and I doubt they would be raising productive members of society no matter how much…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/21 02:56 AM
2

Absolutely. I believe there are waaaaaaaay too many women procreating that should not be.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/21 02:49 AM
3

Yea, and if they don't fulfill it, then they're at fault. You're just trying to pull a false equivalency. Men are held to higher standards since they are stronger. That is why people get more mad at men hitting a woman, even if she was hitting him first. Men have an advantage so society places higher expectations on him. That should go for women too. Women have an advantage, so they shouldn't abuse it. And if they do fuck up, then the blame is higher on them. Just like the blame is usually more …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/21 02:48 AM
2

Women claim that they are the gatekeepers of the next generation or whatever. That is why they "need to be so selective" and why it is justified that women have an easier time getting laid/more women procreated throughout history/etc. If women are screwing up that role so much, then the majority of the blame belongs on them.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/21 02:14 AM
2

Then they should stop having kids. Tons of women have no business procreating. Then young women should stop complaining so much about the "pay gap".
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/21 02:12 AM
8

Women here always talk about how they're the bottleneck on which men get to reproduce and brag about it. If they are screwing that role up so much, then they're the bigger problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/21 11:51 PM
5

Tech related, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/21 11:47 PM
1

You're being ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/21 11:46 PM
1

I could see them being dangerous to guys who are just trying to fuck and chuck. I don't put it past them to make a false rape allegation or trying to ruin someone's reputation because they felt they were somehow wronged by not being committed to.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/21 11:33 PM
1

I just did actually. The reason I asked you first is because you were at the end of the thread and the most recent commenter of the thread on the line. And like I said, you sounded pretty confident about it. And why would I ask another user before you if I didn't want to see it?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/21 11:21 PM
1

Is there a specific study?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/21 11:20 PM
2

No I didn't, I legitimately asked. If you have it, I'd still love to see it. I also legitimately asked another user before you that you can see in this very thread. There's literally no reason to get this defensive.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/21 11:16 PM
3

Some do, but it isn't incredibly high stress so some come back. It is a career field that is "male dominated" so there's a lot of affirmative action that incentivizes women.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/21 11:15 PM
2

No, how was that trolling? People can't show you your logic is wrong? I responded to you because you seemed pretty confident about the study, so I thought you had one.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/21 11:14 PM
1

Ok, just pointing out that what you said didn't make sense in the context of what he said.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/21 11:06 PM
6

I mean, I'll take your word for it. But I work in a pretty ambitious career field, and almost all of the women that work with me are in relationships. The single ones get paired up relatively quickly. As far as I know, single women in the kind of demographic you are talking about are a small minority, but I'd love to see some statistics on it. Again, anecdotally, the crazy cat lady tends to be kinder than the high powered "independent woman who don't need no man". So I'll concede that men should…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/21 11:05 PM
9

I don't really care too much. Any amount I care is due to women being a net drain in terms of taxes while men are net contributors (as groups). I myself am in a high income group so pay a lot of taxes. So when I hear "oh, I'm doing this all by myself and don't need men for anything", I think "what a bunch of BS". And tbh, I do find them annoying. Like if you said it within your girls groups, no man would care unless he was invited into your spaces somehow. I often see it is as part of an overall…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/21 10:51 PM
2

I think you misinterpreted what he was saying, at least how I read it. He said divorced men would be counted as single men and divorced women would be counted as single women. So among those groups, divorced men brought happiness levels down for single men more than divorced women would for single women. I don't know how you got that men and women were being counted differently from that. But I asked a couple of people on here. I don't think anyone actually read the studies themselves at all, an…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/21 10:45 PM
1

Can you tell us what studies you are referring to? I'm still trying to find them. Closest I could find was Paul Dolan's book, but that isn't anything but a metastudy, and I can't find the actual studies used.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/21 10:28 PM
3

Where can I find these statistics. I did a Google search, and the only related study I found was this one that said women are seeing declining happiness: https://law.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=2444&context=alea&sei-redir=1#search=%22paradox%20declining%20female%20happiness%20married%20women%22. The only other "source" I found, spoke about Paul Dolan's book, but 1) that did not say anything a comparison between men and women, just intrasex comparisons about marr…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/21 10:27 PM
0

No, bad idea, because then you run a larger risk of them going on dates with you for things other than you. That hurts more when you actually like the girl. It is also risky because you are less likely to notice them trying to use you because you have blinders on, or will try to justify it somehow if you do notice it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/21 05:47 AM
6

Damn, a lot of the women responding here a children of divorce and hate their dads (read: daddy issues). Explains a lot actually...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/21 12:41 AM
-2

The study showed that of the couples who divorced when a partner was sick, it was more often the man who left. But that does not mean most men do it, since most couples stay together when the partner is sick, man or woman. The couples who split after a partner gets sick was very small.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/21 11:58 PM
1

No u
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/21 04:08 AM
7

Depends on the job. I'd rather date a poor social worker than a rich OnlyFans girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/21 03:28 AM
0

Looks like a hardcore Christian. I would bet a lot that she has taken it up the butt a couple dozen times before graduating.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/21 02:44 AM
1

Well she is dating him currently. But I guess it also depends on if you have a good relationship with your father and actually care about spending time with him.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/21 02:42 AM
1

Are you aware that you can be mad at multiple people at once.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/21 02:18 AM
4

Me personally? I don't think you and I have ever spoken. But no.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/21 01:45 AM
2

Did I say the guy shooting had zero responsibility? No. But the situation was clearly brought on due to the actions of the mother. She defied court ordered custody agreements with the flimsy excuse of "I wanted to see him". You really think there's zero malice there? Who was the first bad faith actor in the entire situation? The mother. These two men had no reason to meet, other than due to the actions of the mother. She's the hinge in the entire situation. That's a dumb analogy because the bf w…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/21 01:42 AM
1

Well the guy who was trying to get custody of the son wasn't trying to shoot anyone was he? I think you have a very loose definition of "logic".
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/21 12:57 AM
0

The entire situation arose because the mom refused to abide the custody agreement and keep his son away from him. Then she hid behind her gun toting affair partner. If she hadn't done that, the dad and stepdad would have 0 reason to talk.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/21 11:54 PM
1

You guys see this video of a guy who got killed by a stepdad after the mom fucked around with custody?: https://www.everythinglubbock.com/news/local-news/kyle-carruth-attorney-makes-case-for-self-defense-after-deadly-shooting-of-chad-read/ The dad was supposed to get his son at 3:15, and the mom was playing games saying he'd have to wait until six. The stepfather got involved and shot him. Fathers get screwed so often on custody. Even when he wants custody, the mom is out here trying to thwart i…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/21 11:36 PM
8

When was this, back in the 70s and 80s?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/21 11:22 PM
3

The mods ban a lot and remove comments to tilt the conversation a certain way. But I agree, IRL it seems TRP is becoming normalized. It is still the minority opinion (at least out loud), but it isn't as niche as it used to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/21 11:19 PM
1

But this place isn't the only place women complain about men, is it? Its all over TikTok, Insta, Twitter, etc. Women are talking about most men. I am positive that I have seen women here talking about like 90% of men in general here, the thing I will concede is that they were probably FDSers. However, FDSers are a growing proportion of the women here, if not the majority already. And FDS for sure talks about the majority of men IRL being horrible. The best example of that being the case here, is…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/21 03:24 AM
1

I don't know if an in group bias is a good thing though.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/21 12:06 AM
1

I think we can expect a lot more of this going forward. That was just in the 80s. I wonder how many times it happened in the 2000s and 2010s.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/21 11:27 PM
2

Women here call men losers much more often. Some have had relationships in the past, but are single now, so are somehow losers on PPD for that. I myself am in a relationship, but I don't bring it up often. However, I would agree women don't tend to call other women losers. The female in group bias is strong. What they are much more likely to say is that the men are losers and don't deserve their SO. I've seen that happen here numerous times. You can't try to mirror experiences of the two genders…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/21 11:13 PM
2

Pretty much every woman here believes that most men are horrible, but their SO is "one of the good ones" (like the comment bigots make when they have their token minority friend). Think about what kind of person you have to be to be flattered by that. A "house fuckboi" of sorts. But I can kind of see it. Like if you have a wife who thinks most men are horrible, except for you, you might think that you have a lower chance of being cheated on or something because she hates most other men. The catc…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/21 10:57 PM
0

I wish just one of those dudes would come on here and share their views. Has that ever happened? Like some of the women here talk about their SOs and how they are so great, but I get the feeling that they are major losers.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/21 10:51 PM
1

No no, I mean would they be considered conventionally attractive? You say some, so the majority were men that probably would have had an average to above average ease in getting laid anyway? If some were short or old, I guess "thank you for your service". That's really the silver lining in stories like these, at least some guys who would have had dry dicks otherwise got laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/21 10:24 PM
3

Were they all hot, or did at least some unattractive guys get something out of it too?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/21 10:20 PM
7

I know, but it is still surprising on how easy it is. Like child's play. I mean, I doubt this sub's standards and IRL are very different, unattractive women just have an incredibly easy time getting laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/21 10:17 PM
9

JFC, 15 guys in 3 months for an "unattractive girl". Pussy privilege is astounding.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/21 10:11 PM
7

Has anyone been able to find the actual raw data or study yet? Like I see they linked to GSS, but what in particular did they use to gather this data point?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/21 02:01 AM
1

As long as you're consistent, it doesn't matter. Most women aren't.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/21 12:06 AM
1

Then it shouldn't be anyone's problem if a woman can't keep her legs shut or take care of the abortion at home either.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/21 11:31 PM
1

This argument is basically the pro-life argument of "if you don't want a child, then don't have sex". From what I can tell, [pro-choice] women don't think that is a valid argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/21 08:09 PM
1

I haven't heard men here say they shouldn't be expected to pay for their children if they want kids. It is only if they do not, ie financial abortion. Likewise, if women want kids, then they should pay for them themselves. If they were forced to have a child they didn't want, then I could see society (one that doesn't allow abortions) having to pay.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/21 08:02 PM
2

/u/parahacker, reveal yourself. Are you Indian?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/21 07:57 PM
2

How do you know he's Indian and not American? I assume you're talking about this exchange: https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/qzyzl3/female_sensibilities_have_absolute_social_hegemony/hlqtmx4/? His English is quite good, and his text shows complex thought. And the links I read in that exchange showed that he read at least a little on the subject, even if he is not American. And as an American, plenty of Americans also lecture other people about their own histories, whether they b…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/21 07:54 PM
3

Has this data from /r/dataisbeautiful made its way around this sub yet? Right up its alley. np.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/qz3pri/oc_share_of_individuals_under_age_30_who_report/ Saw a couple of posts that had some intriguing thoughts, but haven't had any time to really read much in there.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/21 05:05 AM
2

You can kind of piece it together. They have a newborn, and in the beginning she says "I did, but things are much different now". So it might be that he was trying to have a relationship with his son (the relationship he mentioned before leaving), and she went back on her word to let him do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/21 06:01 PM
1

The men who pump up the egos of the FDS women deserve it tbh. Thirsty men who enable these scum women are a huuuuuge problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/21 06:29 AM
4

They do in lesbian ones, I think. I'd love to see a video of that though.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/21 06:26 AM
2

Holy crap, did anyone see that video of the NFL player abusing his baby mama?: https://mirror.fro.wtf/reddit/post/3229574 That was the first time in my life I actually saw domestic violence in video or anything. He just ragdolled her. I thought she would scream or something. EDIT: Oh no wait, the first time ever was the Ray Rice video. Somehow this felt more "real". Maybe the improved video quality or the longer video?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/21 06:21 AM
1

But why do you like watching him squirm when your ex is the one who screwed you over? Did he really do anything to you that engenders bitterness towards him rather than your ex wife?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 03:51 PM
1

What does that have to do with anything? Those guys aren't gold dug, so it is irrelevant. Hot rich guys are getting women because they want them.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 06:35 AM
2

Didn't your wife leave you (tall lawyer guy) for a short rich guy? I much more resemble the latter than the former, so she's still a hero in my book, sorry pal.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 04:57 AM
1

Of course the hot ones won't, the ugly ones do.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 04:51 AM
1

You're right, I did overlook social assortive mating and you got to it before I edited it with a more nuanced description of what I meant. However, you have still misunderstood it. Not to mention all of the wrong conjectures like only old people have to routinely deal with gold diggers and stuff like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 04:24 AM
1

Assortive mating doesn't talk about "first and foremost", it is a tendency. Marrying beautiful women is definitely a higher priority for rich men. They simply have a wide variety of women to choose from, including the rich beautiful women. If there ever were a dearth, then they would go for the poor beautiful women. So assortive mating only describes them going for rich pretty women rather than rich ugly women. You really think rich men would go for the latter rather than a poor beautiful woman?…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 04:20 AM
1

No, that is patently false. There's no shortage of rich men marrying non-rich women to show that they do not do it "first and foremost". What does tend to hold true is that their wives are good looking. Or, as I have stated multiple times before, where people in a social circle actually have things in common and there isn't just one black sheep doing something everyone else judges. A person who marries a gold digger is in a social circle where that is not unusual. The scenario you are describing…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 04:08 AM
1

Yea, "attempt". Are you a man? You'd be scared of a woman beating you like she would another woman? You couldn't stop a woman from hitting you? Being that weak as a man is highly, highly abnormal.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 03:54 AM
1

I know you're trying to make a bad joke, but that is still abnormal and doesn't make sense. Lesbian daughters aren't going around beating up their dads.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 03:45 AM
1

Rich men tend to marry pretty women. Now if two women are equally pretty, then yeah he'll go for the rich one. You ignored my point about the social circle itself. If one man marries a poor woman, I doubt he is the only one in that social circle to do so. You've concocted a very specific, unlikely scenario to fit your argument. That specific scenario is where all members but one married a poor woman. It is faaar more likely that a social circle has similar tastes and if a man marries a poor woma…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 03:18 AM
2

That's why you raise your lesbian daughter to be buff and to be the beater rather than the beatee, if that situation is unavoidable.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 03:07 AM
36

This. That situation is blatantly discussed among bisexual women on Reddit too. I see it all the time. But I don't think it has anything to do with bisexual women in particular. Women in general hold men to faaar higher standards than they hold women. Bisexual women specifically do tend to be more rigid in male gender roles than female ones IME.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 02:59 AM
1

First of all, they definitely do encourage it. "Get that bag" and all, ie marry a rich person to secure your future. Are you way over 30 or something? When women do criticize gold digging relationships, they are far more likely to blame the man. "What did you expect" if he gets hurt or anything. Second of all, you are just concocting random scenarios to try to fit your argument. For example, in your very first one, the "female peers" of the said wealthy man are more likely to be gold diggers the…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 02:56 AM
1

That's just women being classist. Women wouldn't let a poor woman in no matter what. It has nothing to do with being a gold digger. If that same woman were not a gold digger, she would still be treated that way. It also has nothing to do with concern about the man at all. It points to them being jealous of who they consider below them having money/access they think shouldn't have it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 02:39 AM
4

Oh please. No they don't. Those that do speak from a place of jealousy (of the money, not the man) rather than any sort of moral viewpoint.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 01:50 AM
1

I haven't made a decision on this age gap thing either way, so am just using this as more of a thought exercise. But I wouldn't be, and I still don't think that says anything about age gaps in general. Because I also wouldn't be happy if my daughter became a garbagewoman. There isn't anything inherently wrong with being a garbagewoman either. There is a lot of stuff I wouldn't be happy with my hypothetical daughter being, just because I don't want to deal with that shit in my family. Like if I h…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 01:04 AM
1

Then the problem isn't men for not providing you with romance (since women aren't doing it either). The problem is you, you're just blaming men for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 08:52 PM
1

So get out of the patriarchal society made by/for men to the desert somewhere with your cat and wine and see happy you can be.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 08:51 PM
6

It isn't what they are explicitly "asking" for, because I think even they realize how ridiculous it is on some level. But the person you responded to is correct in saying that is what they want and what they are trying to achieve.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/20 02:31 AM
1

Keep in mind that women also tend to go into the less demanding and competitive specialties. From what I am seeing, I suspect the plan is for women to be sent to primary care and the easier specialties while the men duke it out for the very competitive specialties and work the demanding specialties. This is just a reflection of the general world where men and women "do the same job", but really men have to work harder. I'm sure some token women will be given preferential treatment to go into the…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/20 03:19 PM
14

My point is that both he and the other woman agree with the fact that women are the ones with high standards. Whether men are unreasonable in whether they want to change is immaterial and irrelevant to this thread. Your claim seems to be that the woman is making things up to appeal to men, but even this other guy who is the gender flipped version is saying the same thing on this particular topic. If anything, it sounds like his advice will be for women to lower their standards. That shouldn't be…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/20 09:51 PM
3

This is what happens when you celebrate the weaponization of sexual harassment accusations.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/20 09:44 PM
11

Your point is irrelevant to the point of women being the ones with high standards, and it being noticed by dating coaches.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/20 09:38 PM
15

I never heard of this guy but just looked him up, and it sounds like even he says that women are the ones with high standards (the main point of this thread): If you have very high standards, there will be fewer men “qualified” to date you. If only 5% of men are qualified to date you, you must go on more dates to find love than someone who is open to dating a greater percentage of the population. To get more dates, you have to make more time and effort to find love. In all relationships, there a…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/20 09:28 PM
2

Dude, calm down. First of all, it is an easy thing to look up: https://www.aamc.org/news-insights/more-women-men-are-enrolled-medical-school. That trend will only increase, just like what happened in college admissions in general. Women get preferential treatment in higher education (education in general really). If you compare MCAT scores between the sexes, men usually have higher scores but still have lower admission rates. GPA is practically identical. Funny that. https://www.aamc.org/system/…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/20 03:38 PM
8

Doctors will also be majority female in the future. Any male advantage now is due to the old boomer generation.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/20 09:03 PM
1

If a woman chooses literal shit to be her baby daddy, what does that make her?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/20 02:20 PM
2

Dude you're a tradcon. Are you really going to pretend you don't have double standards for men?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/20 04:33 AM
-3

Maybe she drove the father away with her shit personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/20 04:14 AM
1

Her family sounds like a nightmare, by American standards. They expect a shotgun wedding (I’m half expecting the dad to greet my friend at the door with a gun, that’s how hard they’re pressuring them). They expect part of his paycheck, to live with them, etc. So, why can't the guy just say no? What are they gonna do, actually shoot him or take his paycheck? At worst, he'll pay child support like he would have to for a Western thot anyway...
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/20 07:19 PM
1

Not true anymore. You can still actually own your clinic these days as a dentist, independent clinics by physicians are dying.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/20 09:43 PM
1

It makes me hate the simps funding her. Not gonna lie, it makes me hate financially poor men who I suspect make up the majority of her simp army. So now when I hear things like "Americans are struggling", I think things like "I hope it is affecting those dumb fucking simps".
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/20 04:20 AM
1

One of the ones I linked or another you found? I'd like to see it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/20 03:14 AM
11

It is funny that there's so many women here speaking for their husbands, but you hardly ever hear from the happy husbands themselves. How often outside of /r/cuckold do you hear "pretty happy that my wifey was run through by 50 guys"?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 05:40 PM
2

Of course every case is different, the study wasn't presenting every individual anomaly. Like a man who has a huge inheritance from his parents probably won't receive as much resentment. We're talking about generalities, and in general women resent their husbands making less. And so he has to make up for it somehow.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 05:22 AM
2

At the end of the day, the conflict is a result of the gender roles and resentment the wife holds to the detriment of her husband. Clearly the husband is trying to move past the gender roles, but even if he takes on the housework he is just breaking even and receiving the status leakage penalty. But the current cultural zeitgeist absolves women of holding harmful negative gender roles. Even when this subject comes up, the end goal always turns into reframing into "well husbands should just do mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 05:15 AM
2

Part of our gender roles is that women get to be pampered while men have to work to make sure their wives get pampered. It never works out the opposite way. I'm sure status leakage happens in childless couples as well, probably more so. If a woman tied her status to being the traditional wife, she wouldn't go for the career woman role anyway and certainly wouldn't care about the status leakage of a man with a lower income. Women just hold men to higher standards in pretty much everything, this i…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 05:02 AM
6

It is just one factor that can mask another factor. The status leakage aspect doesn't go away. Think about status leakage being -1 and house duties being +1. Then it cancels out. But it doesn't work the same way for women because men don't resent women the same way, ie women have the benefit of not getting the -1 status leakage penalty from their husbands. So her +1 for doing housework makes her feel like she is giving something to her husband while the househusband is just breaking even. Not a …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 04:48 AM
1

Ironic, because in most cases if a woman decides to be a housewife and not contribute to the income anymore - the husband can't do anything about it. That's what the jUsT mArRy a CaReER gIrL bloopers miss here. If he can achieve /r/financialindependence before quitting, maybe she can't be so salty. Like if I reach my /r/financialindependence number and can live off of my investments early, wifey better just deal with me not working - she should have started saving more for retirement herself.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 04:41 AM
0

The market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent. Yeah, it will crash down at some point - but I personally believe the crash will take generations. This shit just started.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 01:07 AM
17

I was referring to this bar chart: https://ifstudies.org/ifs-admin/resources/familylifesatisfybyearningfigure-1-w640.png The status leakage still exists though, it is just made up for through domestic duties. However, I don't think things would work out well if there were no kids. Then the status leakage exists but the man can't make up for it with childcare. Or what happens when the kids move out? Status leakage with nothing to cover it up. I don't think men have status leakage in the same way.…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 01:05 AM
6

At a certain point, men will just have to accept that women will outearn the average man in the future. They have all sorts of AA to help them out and do-nothing jobs like "Chief Diversity Officer" or that other shit which will be a closed club dominated by women. A tiny portion of the top men will earn massive salaries so that the average "pay gap" will favor the men, and the average man will be continuously screwed as he is punished to make up for the "pay gap" created by the top earning men. …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 01:01 AM
2

No I'm not. I am saying they will be derided for them. Just as a neckbeard with high standards would. Why do you think people make fun of neckbeards who say their standards are hot women? If they want to be happy, then they will have to accept at some point that what they are asking for is simply unrealistic and readjust their standards. Looks definitely have an effect on socialization and your experiences through your life. Ugly people and hot people do not have the same experiences in life and…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 12:53 AM
52

This study says that men are not unhappier to be outearned so I don't believe it is an emasculation thing: https://ifstudies.org/blog/the-happiness-penalty-for-breadwinning-moms. Feminists say that the reason women are unhappy is because they still do more housework even when earning more. But here is another article that talks about how there is "status leakage" among higher earning women: We found that wives who believed they held higher status positions than their husbands were indeed more li…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 12:49 AM
1

I meant "nice guys TM" or faux nice guys or whatever they call them. But I guess I should have specified meek/passive/ugly guys. It is stupid, but a lot of things that society tells us is stupid. But then that changes the whole premise of the point because a hot woman with the same standards is more justified in having them. "High standards" is relative. A woman with Kate Beckinsale's standards with Lena Dunham's looks has too high standards. Yes, pretty much everyone does. That's why I brought …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 12:39 AM
2

You are making the classic mistake of thinking natural selection and evolution has an endpoint or that it necessarily means "improvement". That is not the case. Natural selection helps a species adapt, it doesn't make you improve. If a species would better adapt by losing improvements as we see them, then that will happen. For example, let's say that due to a lack of food or space or whatever, small stature is more adaptive for an environment. Smaller people will survive more often because they …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/20 10:29 PM
2

Insofar as that being tall as a woman is usually seen as less desirable than being short, I suppose so. Like her standards get higher with her own height. If she's 6'3'', her pool of men is tiny and that makes for a high standard. But like I said, I think it makes more sense to base it off of attractiveness. A tall model looking woman? No. A tall mannish woman? Yes. They probably both want tall men to make them feel more feminine/petite/protected/whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/20 06:47 PM
3

Yea, in the same way a lot of women are told "nice guys are kinder or whatever" a lot of guys are told "homely/ugly girls are kinder" too. Obviously both are BS, but young people don't know that. Yea, if she were hotter it would be more tolerable and would make more sense. Like in my current relationship, she is hot so I feel like I am "getting something" for meeting the standards. She has reasonable standards for who she is, many women have standards that don't make sense. They are allowed to h…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/20 06:39 PM
3

Tall women do only want to date tall men, for the most part. I have never heard of a blonde woman only wanting to date blonde men. But you're right in that I don't think short women wanting to date tall men is necessarily a high standard since tall men seem to prefer short women over tall women as well. I think it would be more accurate to say that ugly women wanting to date tall men since it is a physically attractive trait is a high standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/20 06:24 PM
3

To get what she wants, no - as is shown by what is happening now (pumped and dumped). I do regret my own part, because it rewarded her high standards [for a time].
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/20 06:18 PM
9

The point is even if a man is "chosen" to be dated by a woman who has high standards, it doesn't mean he doesn't see the BS of it all. She would be better off if she dated someone on her own level.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/20 06:12 PM
8

Not true IME. I once did the whole "date an ugly girl" thing because I believed she would be more down to earth. Unfortunately, she wasn't and still had really high standards (that she herself wasn't close to meeting). I fit them, but then thought "this girl is way too ugly to act this bitchy" and left. She complained that that "always happened to her", and last I heard she was still getting pumped and dumped.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/20 05:46 PM
2

I've met one or two "average pretty white girl" lesbians, but their partners were bad looking and looked like dudes. I have never met a lesbian couple that were both significantly above average looking.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/20 03:40 PM
1

It is the fact that it is a 100% failure rate that is suspect. I have met my fair share of shitty women. But I have met great women who treated me well as well. If it smells like shit everywhere you go, check under your own shoe.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/20 08:19 PM
5

I noticed a telling sign is that she never mentioned how she treated those men. Like are we really supposed to believe she is just some angel continually wronged by men? The more likely situation is that she gets in to relationships where she is just as shitty to her male partners, but only notices the faults of her partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/20 08:05 PM
2

They're irrelevant. That is like talking about sex and then someone saying "oh well some people like mixing poop and sex". And? Who gives a shit about those people. If you want to argue that women who only date men who are 6 foot + are just as stupid as men who only date blondes, then okay - but then both are pretty damn stupid. In the context of this video, that makes them trash - not all the people who don't meet their standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/20 07:55 PM
5

How many men actually care whether the blonde is natural or not? I've literally never heard of a man caring about that. They may prefer a natural, but there is no way any significant portion of men will only date natural blondes. If they were, they would be mocked mercilessly.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/20 07:48 PM
6

You can dye your hair blonde... there are way more blondes out there than 2%.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/20 07:44 PM
3

Ok, let's take a look at her specific examples: https://youtu.be/M6QQm6VtOAA?t=296 One of her reasons for why men are trash is that they don't make plans. Let's leave aside how stupid that is and look at the complaint. Why aren't the women who are trash for not making plans. Like under the conditions set, if men don't do something then they are trash but if women don't do the same thing they aren't? Nah, to me that shows women are trash for expecting men to do everything for them. That is a ridi…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/20 07:29 PM
10

Are you aware that women have a far larger in-group bias than men do for their own gender? Are you aware that men also subscribe to the "women are wonderful bias". The "men good, women bad" narrative is a strawman myth, the "women good, men bad" narrative is actually held by people in the real world. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women-are-wonderful_effect#In-group_bias
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/20 07:05 PM
3

All different types of women are having problems with all different types of men. That still doesn't explain why the "common problem" is with men and not women... Your point is that no matter how different of a man is from other men, he will still share the "common problem" with them all even if he has nothing else in common with the rest. My point is, then why isn't it that no matter how different a woman is from the rest, still can't share that "one common problem" with all the rest? It isn't …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/20 06:54 PM
10

Men are the ones who invented law and order to hold other men accountable...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/20 06:47 PM
12

"if all of these women are having these problems, maybe it's not us - it's you." How does this leap in logic make sense? "It can't be all of us, so it must be all of you". But why can't it be all of women who are the problem? I mean it is either all women or all men. So why does all women having problems mean the issue is all men instead of all women? I think the easiest way to compare is to look at bisexual and homosexual couples. I have noticed that when a woman is bisexual she still tends to …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/20 06:43 PM
3

If one were to be made, could we have it "advertised" here so people would know it exists. Sometimes the issue is people don't even know subreddit names. Like if a comment is deleted, would a comment like "take it to /r/xxxxxx" so the discussion could be continued be acceptable?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/20 09:54 PM
1

lolno, the girl I'm with now is hotter. The feeling is more like "glad I dodged that bullet". Of course, I'm also glad that I got her while she was hot and now some other schlub gets her while shes not.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/20 12:00 AM
2

I'm still FB friends with a few of my college exes. Today I came across a pic with one's new bf of a few months. This girl hit the wall hard, and she's only 25. Gained a lot of weight and looks damn near 40. We went to a party school and she was in a sorority. Her bf may as well look like the Google Images version of the average frustrated chump - skinny fat with a Ted Cruz looking face. This particular ex told me she had been with 18 guys by senior year of college, I don't even want to know wha…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/20 10:04 PM
1

Wouldn't those funds still be split in a divorce if the other person got a lawyer? It is smart to accumulate premarital assets and not comingle them. My current assets are enough to get me to CoastFIRE by 65 with 6% growth. If I do get married in the next couple of years, I'll just let it grow and never comingle those funds. That way if I get divorce raped, I'll still be able to CoastFIRE at 65 instead of being a poor old man. Of course, I'm not sure if this will work. Maybe one of the lawyers h…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/20 06:17 PM
2

I suppose everyone is entitled to their own opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/20 03:12 PM
3

I don't think that is exclusive to FDS - plenty of regular women do that. FDS just makes them double down. But taking their partners for granted, acting like they don't measure up to some standards they hold and treating them as lesser for it, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/20 06:50 AM
4

One way is constantly "testing" their partner and then using failures as "gotcha" moments. Any person can have a bad day and fail "tests". That doesn't mean you tricked them into showing their true colors, you just pressured them and harassed them. There's a lot of "oh I thought a had a HVM but now I think he's a LVM because of this one thing" in saw in FDS when I last looked. There's a lot of absolutes like a HVM would never blahblahblah.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/20 05:49 AM
2

Because they try to get good relationships and fail - or transform potentially good relationships into bad relationships themselves. One thing I find lacking in FDS is they never teach that the women might be the ones who are the problems in the relationship. But they still tried harder than they would have had they just said no.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/20 04:30 AM
6

For a woman it is far easier to get in a bad, one-sided relationship than it is to remain single. This makes no sense. It is far easier to remain single because all you would have to do is not date. Nobody forces you to date.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/20 04:17 AM
1

If you look at "natural, primitive, uncontacted tribes" you will see that women aren't "naturally" more attractive than men. If you pluck a man out from one of those tribes and slap some western clothes on him - he'll probably look like an average guy on the streets (maybe even above average considering their physiques). Do that for a woman and she will be noticeably below average. I do think that civilization has chosen more beautiful women along the way as the uglier ones were discarded in som…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/20 05:56 PM
0

That's the point. Women try to act like if we roll back feminism men will suffer too. Nope.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/20 08:14 PM
1

That's a dream. Why should men ever give up that power? The YPJ is part of the SDF. The SDF is led by men. But none of this addresses that the YPJ would not survive if it were not for the men in the SDF and YPG. That is the only reason they survived. SDF with all its men still is not winning the civil war, you think the YPJ alone would? Female led military groups cannot ever survive on their own, they need men protecting them in order to survive. An independent women only military group has neve…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/20 04:18 AM
1

Look up the YPJ, then look up the YPG. The YPJ hardly ever fights without the YPG, and are dependent upon them. And your contention is that women will be the ones put in charge of this tech by men? Why? Men will always have final authority over the military.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/20 03:03 AM
-2

They would still lose. I assume you are talking about the YPJ. The only reason they had any success at all was because they are the women's unit of the organization led by men, and it was supported by the West. Even if the women's unit wins, you think Syria will become a bastion of feminism? All they are fighting for is one version of patriarchy to win over another. It wouldn't be rape, unless you consider all of human history pre-feminism mass rape. It would be a reorganization of society. Mode…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/20 02:35 AM
0

Other women know what goes on the West (in fact some even have an exaggerated view of how good it is), and they still don't kill themselves over not having it. Some would, I'm sure. But the majority would not. My point is, if the transition were made the death of a small proportion of women wouldn't stop that transition at all. The next generation wouldn't have any memory of it at all - that's really all you need to get to. One generation past the reversion and you're home free.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 11:24 PM
1

But it is not linked with the sanctions is my point. Saudi Arabia has basically the same policies for women and they are not under sanctions. Have you ever been to SA? The QoL is high, they are one of the richest countries in the world. Yes, due to oil but Norway is also rich due to oil. Doesn't mean anything. Iran is also much more productive and educated than SA, they would be as productive as Turkey or Malaysia without the sanctions. I don't know how much of the world you have traveled, but y…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 10:43 PM
0

Why not? You can't simply compare Iran to its previous self because of the confounding variable of the sanctions and cold war with the US occurred at the same time as the burkanization. Those things were not directly related to the burkanization of women. You think if Iran didn't threaten Israel and the US, they'd be under sanctions now? They'd just be another Saudi Arabia. Yes, because of the extenuating issues I mentioned. Other countries have oil. Venezuela and Angola have oil. Iran actually …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 10:35 PM
-4

That's not the point. The point is that it isn't as impossible or improbable as the women here are trying to act like it would be. On Iran, yes it is nowhere near the US's QoL. But it is in the desert, is being sanctioned by the entire world, and is in a cold war with the most powerful country in the history of the world. Despite that, it still has a relatively high HDI and GDP compared to the rest of the developing world. If Iran can do that, then if the Western world ever did want to return to…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 10:29 PM
-4

You all say this, but let's look at real life examples. Places like Iran had a small taste of liberalism and then went full burka. Sure, some women may have died or killed themselves - but the majority did what they were told to. You guys can act hard all you want, but when push comes to shove I think the situation will be the same as the internet keyboard warriors who go "man if I were there, I'd punch him out!". Sure. Even if you and the OP actually did what you say you will, I don't think you…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 09:53 PM
4

That's been the exact point TRP has been making for years, women just don't want to believe it. So there is basically no way to convince you that TRP may be right on this issue, even if the data is there? Basically you outright will not believe it unless... what? So it is from a survey. They didn't intentionally go around getting a certain type of woman. They sent it out to a general population and this is the results they got from a representative sample. I mean, it would be a pretty simple err…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 07:14 AM
2

will do
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 07:09 AM
2

Probably, millions of men do it everyday (with sons no less). You don't understand how badly I don't want a daughter.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 07:07 AM
2

Yeah, way more sons on both sides of the family. Even the ones with daughters have like 2 sons each and then a daughter. Son is always first born though. How come my uncles and my dad got lucky, but I can't. I just don't believe that's true. There must be something to this gene thing. Unless they all just had abortions without anyone finding out... But if I still ended up with a daughter, yeah - I'd be an uninterested father probably. NGL, it will probably up my chances of leaving and trying aga…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 07:04 AM
2

The work by Corry Gellatly, a research scientist at the university, has shown that men inherit a tendency to have more sons or more daughters from their parents. This means that a man with many brothers is more likely to have sons, while a man with many sisters is more likely to have daughters. That study is keeping hope alive, since that is my case. But fingers crossed we can just get the abobo.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 06:47 AM
3

Black, Christian, highly educated, fully employed, decent income, from South, work >60hrs/week I was just looking at the data in the facts and figures. Looking at it, it said black men had a lower correlation for sexlessness than even white women. Black men had the lowest correlation for sexlessness. They are an outlier for men here. Now we can either take that at face value (who are they having sex with then?). Or we can consider that they are embellishing, as men have been shown to do in other…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 06:43 AM
1

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2767066?utm_campaign=articlePDF&utm_medium=articlePDFlink&utm_source=articlePDF&utm_content=jamanetworkopen.2020.3889 Look at the supplement for the raw data.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 06:39 AM
3

Sure, not if you're blue pilled.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 06:33 AM
4

Why would that be impossible? Sharing men for steady partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 06:31 AM
2

I don't care about ease.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 06:21 AM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complete_androgen_insensitivity_syndrome Even if you have the Y gene, you could have abnormalities. In this particular abnormality, if your Y gene doesn't work - you will become a woman (a defective woman, but everyone will think you look like a woman). The default is to look like a woman, working male genes turn you into a man. Doesn't work in the reverse for women, where they start off women but turn into men due to a defective female gene.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 06:18 AM
6

We are in a boiling frog in the pot situation. Even here, on this sub where people are supposed to be more in tune with this stuff, we see people burying their head in the sand. I hope global warming takes us before we see the end result of this decline.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 06:15 AM
4

Hypergamy has always existed, the current cultural zeitgeist has not.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 06:12 AM
1

Biologically, we do all start off with the female system. Then the Mullerian system decays and our Wolffian system develops.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 06:11 AM
7

I think the biggest reason for the sexlessness among men is the demonization of men and their sexuality. That has definitely happened more within the past decade. It is a cultural problem where women are deemed to be "good" and men "evil". That is what needs to be fixed.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 06:09 AM
1

Refer to the supplement for the hard data: https://cdn.jamanetwork.com/ama/content_public/journal/jamanetworkopen/938482/zoi200181supp1_prod.pdf?Expires=2147483647&Signature=t1Xt1kfaENfXo4InR4XgIdl884dBx3304F28l17WuHmD98yCJLZuInme-5obTG32dpHFh6JnFjecMM~XJYtBWjgTpNDKCbNlYoGV-m50hLXcDR7sdxhcuQoQMsmlnEdFs82AwRqd9tjWKGBxlBq7mldt1llVA9whw99xg5jb~hi6lx1pBWyyMtPH5vjPR6FYWxcX-T1IimpVlgCHIJyNF4zdeBPVE7miCoufkLfY5hIffeNrYq0wbgLpQNnHohJASHSgTFN8j~cjDSDK3eRppi4X535TP7gIqZEmhIfaD9JcA1b08ir~KPF4j-f-u3BFXh-7Gm…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 06:07 AM
11

That depends on your definition of usual. 30.9 didn't get laid at all in the past year, 8.9 got laid 1-2 times per year, and 22.7 are at 1-3 times per month. What I consider usual is weekly, only 37.4 got that. Meanwhile women are at 52.1% for weekly. So no, it isn't a "small but vocal group". The small group is actually the one getting laid a regular amount.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 06:02 AM
1

If I had to guess, I think they mean men are the primary demographic for the dregs of society. They are the majority of the homeless, prisoners, etc. This is due to male variability where there's a lot of men at the upper ends but more men at the lower ends too. Most women are just in the middle.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 05:57 AM
1

Glad she is getting eaten by her own. She's a loony annoying SJW feminist that contributed to the "cancel" culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 05:54 AM
2

I know plenty of women who want sons more than daughters. And I know plenty of men who were lucky enough to only have sons, not exactly an uncommon possibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 05:52 AM
1

But also, daughters can be kind of bitchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 03:36 AM
1

I only ever want to be a father to a boy. I really don't want a daughter. I'd rather be childless than have only a daughter(s). I do think I'd be good at raising a son. My stumbling blocks came early in life because my parents are blue pilled. But I can get my kid the advantages he needs from an early age. I definitely have the resources. I don't think I would be a good father to a daughter, but that is because I would resent it and wouldn't want to be a father to a girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 03:05 AM
4

Were you being facetious? The only races mentioned were white, black, and other. Where did you get Indian? Also, here is the married section: Married Men: 40.4 Women: 46.9 Am I reading that right, married women have higher sexual frequency than married men?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 02:35 AM
3

k
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 06:36 PM
2

So you disagree with the OP that her point that getting easy sex from a prostitute is for most men? If so, I don't even know why I'm having this conversation with you, since that was my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 06:33 PM
1

So?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 06:26 PM
3

Brothels and agencies exist in Nevada, USA. Seems like you are just wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 06:25 PM
1

In countries where it is legal and regulated, they have to pay taxes. Their prices would also be public. Employers have to report employees. Considering all that, there still isn't any indication it is a majority of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 06:22 PM
1

Sounds like a shithole.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 06:19 PM
1

Doesn't matter. Even in countries where prostitution is legal, only a minority of men use it - proving my point. It only ever works if a minority of men use it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 06:18 PM
1

Other watchmen. For your bodyguard example, hire someone from a reputable agency. Like you can either hire a prostitute from the streets or one from an agency. Either way, you get what you paid for.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 06:14 PM
1

Are you sure they hate on the childless? I thought it was the unmarried with children. Those women are scum.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 06:12 PM
1

No it won't, the only reason prices are low is because most men don't use them. If most men did, prices would skyrocket, and we would have the exact situation we have now. If what you were saying made sense, don't you think men would do it? They don't because they know in the long run it will fail. Yeah, so the man is still losing something. He has to choose between no sex or less food. Women can have sex and more food. It isn't the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 06:04 PM
3

What are you even talking about? Your initial question was what if your bodyguard rapes you, what does this have anything to do with that? Were you just asking a dumb question?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 06:02 PM
1

You saying it is illegal sounds made up.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 05:57 PM
3

So what's your point? It is clear that men in general cannot get sex as easily as women in general because as more men try the option you suggest, it will paradoxically make it harder for them to keep using it. The only way it would work is if sex trafficking increased. But even there, the pimps will keep increasing prices. If you're for price controls on prostitution, then that may work. They would still have homes, solving that problem. Many drug addicts and mentally ill people are not homeles…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 05:57 PM
3

Sounds made up.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 05:50 PM
3

Hiring a bodyguard isn't legal?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 05:45 PM
5

Homeless women can literally have sex to get out of homelessness. And you think if more men want their services, their prices will stay the same? Your argument won't work because if more men did try to use prostitutes, then their prices would increase due to demand, they would be priced out, and we would be right back here.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 05:44 PM
2

What?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 05:34 PM
4

Paying is the string. A homeless woman could get laid easily, a homeless man couldn't afford a prostitute. You can only pay so much before you go broke. A woman could have sex forever without going broke, and will actually make money off of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 05:33 PM
21

Spend a bit more to hire a non-rapist bodyguard, just like you would spend a bit more for a hotter prostitute or one with less STDs.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 05:30 PM
12

Presumably you made this in response to men saying they cannot get sex as easily without visiting prostitutes. So women who complain about feeling unsafe in the streets should also be told they can just hire bodyguards.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 05:28 PM
66

So if you can pay for a service, then you can't complain about lack of access to it? Women shouldn't complain about feeling unsafe in the streets then, they can just hire a bodyguard.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 05:16 PM
3

k
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 07:25 AM
2

Not at all, but I can see how someone who wants to believe that would make that mistake.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 07:23 AM
2

Not in modern times, I've liked women and not had to do that and they were just fine with it. My current relationship started that way too. Did you read my actual links? Where they suggested humiliating him in public? Or lying to him? That's not what I am talking about. They tell one sided stories about how they did all the work, but basically discount all the work the men did. Or pretend they were always aggrieved, but leave out all the bad things they did. Anyway, this conversation has gone on…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 07:16 AM
2

How he treats you... by making sure he pays for the date, spoiling you, etc. So they are tied. And they definitely hate on ugly men. Search ugly in FDS. But it isn't just screenshots. When I visited, I saw mostly [one sided] stories. Overall reddit is a forum for text, not a tumblr like page where we just look at pics. They have strategies on getting men to pay for their dinners and if the guys don't want to, they use humiliation by like mocking them or belittling them. But they only ever look a…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 07:03 AM
1

Well, if the LVM has to necessarily come along with the companionship then the LVM has value in the form of companionship. That's like saying HVM don't have value, it's their good looks, money, charm, etc. But you still haven't addressed how if the companionship offered by LVM is negative, which is what FDS says (that LVM drain women), it is chosen over being single. A LVM's companionship is not the same a HVM's one, correct? It is that they lie about what the strategy is and cannot come to term…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 06:58 AM
2

But that isn't a strategy, we're right back to if they wanted to be single all they would have to do is say no to everyone. Their real strategy is to figure out who a HVM is and how to attract him, because if they said no to everyone they would accidentally say no to him too. If what you are saying is true, then I think you have tacitly accepted that LVM aren't really low value if the value they provide is something women have to consciously stay away from. Something that is apparently difficult…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 06:52 AM
2

So your point is that they cannot differentiate companionship from HVM and LVM? Surely it isn't the same, because they claim companionship from HVM is positive while companionship from LVM is actually negative. Your initial point was that a woman was better off being single than getting companionship from LVM. So LVM do provide more value than being single... I think the biggest change that would make sense is to be able to admit most of them will not or cannot succeed at the strategy, and to do…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 06:32 AM
1

I wonder if zoomers have figured out a way to exploit this to get noods. Like a tits out for george or something like that? You know george would have approved.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 06:27 AM
2

But the reason you need a strategy for junk food is because you crave it, because it provides value to you in the form of good taste. Junk food tastes better than healthy food. Junk food is not worse than no food. Are you saying women crave LVM or would prefer LVM to no relationship, cuz you were just saying the exact opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 06:24 AM
2

Still doesn't take a strategy. The "strategy" is basically "say no" - not hard at all. I thought you just said that the point isn't to get any relationship just for the sake of a relationship? You're not being consistent. Is a shitty relationship more wanted than no relationship or not?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 06:19 AM
4

Right, so the strategy boils down to getting a HVM since that is the actual challenge. There is absolutely no challenge in being single. Literally everyone can do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 06:15 AM
5

You don't need a strategy to be single, why is that so hard to understand. It isn't. But we aren't talking about you. We are talking about FDS.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 06:10 AM
3

Honestly, I'm just glad he was able to defeat Hillary and make a fool of her and her supporters. Does anyone remember how the FDS/femcel types were gloating about how she would win? Now the history books will always say the first female candidate lost to DJT - LMAO, that is just so juicy. And the first female VP will be appointed by Biden. If she ever wins, the first woman will always be known as someone who had to rely on a man's help rather than being able to win it on her own.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 06:06 AM
7

Like I said, if their strategy was truly to be single - then they wouldn't need a "strategy". All they would have to do is not date ANYONE. So the strategy really is to lock down a HVM, and since they themselves claim those are a minority - then a minority of women can ever succeed in fulfilling the strategy. Better, not good. If they were better off single, they would have stayed single. I'm not upset by it, I'm just pointing out why it is stupid. On a theoretical level I agree, but the fact th…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 06:01 AM
11

Then their own purpose is self-defeating. There aren't enough men for them to all get HVM. Now you may say "staying single is winning". Staying single doesn't require a strategy. The best way to never date LVM is to never date anyone period. But that isn't what they want, they want to date HVM and since they all can't because HVM are such an extreme minority, then the majority of them will fail. If most men really were LVM, then most people wouldn't be in relationships. Most women do choose to g…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 05:31 AM
6

I made a thread on this before, but it isn't that FDS believe that some men are LVM to some women and HVM to other women. That would make sense. What FDS believes is the majority of all men are LVM to ALL women. That makes no sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 05:08 AM
8

The problem is that they define most men as LVM. I have no problem with saying don't date LVM. But to pretend most men are objectively LVM is stupid. The only way that is true is if the woman is really high value, then most men are LVM compared to her. But FDS women are not HVM, they wouldn't be there if they were.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 04:56 AM
2

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8397065/White-police-officers-community-members-wash-feet-black-faith-leaders-protest.html Apparently it is a Christian thing (so yes, a cult). We already knew Islam was right about women, turns out it was right about Christianity too?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/20 08:36 PM
2

You better either keep her there then. Modern sluttery is like COVID, sooner or later she WILL become infected if she is brought to where infections are rife.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/20 08:18 PM
4

They aren't attracted to women with BPD, they just excuse BPD if the woman is hot enough. The male trajectory of dating preference (across both short- and long-term) generally decreased as attractiveness decreased and BPD increased (Fig. 3) An average looking woman with BPD is not more desirable than an average woman without BPD. I only did a quick skim of the paper, but I didn't see if they said an attractive woman with BPD was more desirable than one without it. A man who chooses to "date" a c…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/20 06:36 AM
1

The problem is this guy probably wouldn't be killing only dangerous people overseas. He'd be killing innocents too like he did here, just overseas. Now I would say he'd have an easier time getting away with it because the US doesn't give a shit about brown people, but he got away with it here too. Maybe the advantage would have been he wouldn't have gotten any scrutiny?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/20 07:04 AM
1

Bisexual women tend to be sluttier from my experience. If you're TRP and just tryna fuck, I don't believe that you would necessarily have a harder time with bisexual women. I think you are overblowing the "women would pick women over settling for the average man". I have dated a few bisexual women and they have always had way higher male n-counts than female ones. A lot of them do like dick more than pussy. I have asked a couple of my exes why this was the case, and the answers were "women are j…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/20 10:35 PM
3

I did. It was just as easy as I thought it would be and wasn't as "traumatic/shitty" as women claim it is. Of course, I used a relatively attractive woman's picture. So if you're mostly attracting fuckboys, you are probably unattractive or look like a fuckgirl yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/20 07:41 PM
1

Some TRP are, some TRP are not. If you're a 7+ man on TRP then yeah go for hot women. But if you're a 4- man on TRP, then don't count on it. Maybe the TRP men on PPD just tend to be on the upper end - which could be possible, greater intellectual capability (assuming people who can debate here adequately are more intellectually capable than those who are unable to without getting banned) is probably correlated with higher SMV for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 07:34 PM
1

Only for how women view men. The average woman gets a lot of sexual attention. At this point you are just being intentionally obtuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 05:37 AM
1

"Recently" - how many decades ago were you back in university?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/20 02:32 PM
6

The point is that it isn't just the caricature of "insta thot club going sluts" doing this. Even the "sweetest" girls are like this now. I have female friends I have known since middle school who fit the "sweet slut" category.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/20 02:28 PM
2

Getting married to a woman with high student loans will exacerbate divorce rape. Women have more of the student debt as a group. Even when you compare women with student debt to men with student debt, women tend to have more. Their plan is to marry someone who will either help them pay it off or pay it off for them. Then they will bounce while taking advantage of the possible higher income or cushier job that the college degree affords them. Of course, many study useless subjects so that adds ev…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/20 02:10 PM
1

Some peak at average women. Average does not mean unattractive, does it? Are you missing words here and there?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/20 01:59 PM
1

Yes, things would get more competitive, but TRP would get more refined. Like I said, the removal/reduction of simps would ameliorate some of the new challenges. I've addressed that. Doesn't matter if they won't date them in the beginning, at the end there aren't enough HVM. But you keep ignoring that TRP doesn't say "only date hot chicks". more attractive women willing to have casual sex with TRP dudes than HVMs willing to commit to FDS chicks This is a total misrepresentation of my point. I don…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/20 04:59 AM
2

A woman can avoid LVM by not dating anyone. That isn't a strategy. That is not playing. What FDS wants to do is win the game by getting a HVM - otherwise they wouldn't be playing. If they fail, then it is just rationalization that they really actually won. If it is success to be single, then they could never have dated at all and still succeeded. woman keeps her sanity and emotional well-being some women may be able to stay sane and well by being single forever with zero romantic contact, but I …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 04:16 PM
2

It is rationalization at that point. If "success" can be defined as not getting the relationship you were going for (with the HVM), then you could have just as easily have succeeded by not following the "strategy". That'd be like saying a man who did not manage to get laid still "succeeded" in TRP because he managed to work out. He could have worked out and not gotten laid without ever having read TRP too. You don't need a strategy to teach you how to be single. That's easy, all you have to do i…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 04:10 PM
1

Which part? Hiding TRP from other men? That makes no sense, it would be the opposite since if TRP spread to other men it would gain traction and simps/white knights/whatever you want to call them would either be reduced in number or lose standing. If you mean that hot chicks are not likely to be dating pre-TRP men, then no argument - but the point is TRP has a realistic chance of attaining that goal since having sex with a hot chick doesn't prevent another man from having sex with her later. All…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 04:06 PM
1

But even if they can't, FDS is still a small enough community that every woman could find a man who meets those standards. Are HVM likely to be dating FDS members? Probably not, since they wouldn't be on FDS if that were already the case. They are starting at a disadvantage and trying to win. But let's pretend that all the FDS women do somehow outcompete the naturals. Their task would then be to hide FDS from other women, because if more than 20% of women ever found FDS strategies, there would b…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 03:35 PM
1

Yes, they are comparable.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 03:29 PM
1

I'm not saying there will be 0 successes from FDS. I am saying the vast majority of them will fail due to their own worldview of HVM being an extreme minority.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 03:28 PM
1

TRP starts our with not having an [pretty much] infinite resource (sex), and advising them on how to get it. FDS says they have too much of a bad thing and not enough of a good thing. But the good thing is finite, highly competitive, and numerically small.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 03:26 PM
1

Well, you brought up the entire manosphere. It is simply segmentation, but the users have quite of bit of overlap. Like if you dig through the users of even that post, you'll see they post on FDS/PinkPill too. Even the mods are similar. It is the same people, just different people talking about different things. Presumably they compartmentalize vitriol as you define it in those subs, while using their "level up" as the self-improvement sub. FDS is the hub. Just like TRP is the hub for like marri…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 03:22 PM
1

FDS themselves say there is a dearth of HVM. If you look at FDS, more (if not the majority) of them complain about not having HVM than talk about having them. The proof is in the pudding, if FDS could get HVM then the sub would be about how great it is to finally have one or how they got one. Those are few and far between. They consistently only talk about their experiences with LVM, because that is all they can get. Most women have casual sex "phases". For TRP, all you have to do is get one dur…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 03:18 PM
0

By definition, a HVM wants to be in a relationship with that woman. It's a mutually beneficial exchange. If you actually read their sidebar on HVMs, you'd see they're mostly after a sort of AlphaBucks, which means the man wants to be there. If a HVM wanted to be with FDSers already, they wouldn't need the sub. Their problem is they have not been able to date HVM. The intro summary to the page explains that with FDS you have to be willing to accept there aren't enough HVM to go around, but that l…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 03:10 PM
1

I addressed this in the OP Now this is assuming that all of the 20% women are in the FDS sub, which is very unlikely. I mean if they were, they wouldn't need FDS to compete. Are HVM likely to be dating FDS members? Probably not, since they wouldn't be on FDS if that were already the case. They are starting at a disadvantage and trying to win. But let's pretend that all the FDS women do somehow outcompete the naturals. Their task would then be to hide FDS from other women, because if more than 20…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 03:02 PM
1

You honestly think these FDS chicks aren't just finding guys that tick enough HVM boxes and explaining away the rest? There is no universal HVM, they even say an HVM for one might not be for another. Then all they are doing is rationalizing for the time being. That goes back to how I said they keep trying to catch HVM slipping and then say "oh he was LVM all along". Sure, if you take a snapshot they may say they have a HVM. But when you move across the timeline, it will end with them saying they…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 02:59 PM
1

Just typing "change" into the search bar for FDS shows they do not think LVM can change. Even if what you are saying is true, negative punishment is worse than positive reinforcement using psych terms.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 02:56 PM
1

FDS says LVM are pretty much irredeemable. The closest view to your position is the eugenics argument where in the future if they keep breeding HVM, maybe they will outnumber LVM. But really what will happen is that they will just keep raising standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 02:54 PM
1

A simp doesn't display submissive characteristics only, he is more submissive than anything else - it is almost his defining feature.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 02:53 PM
1

Where did I make that mistake? I am using FDS's definition. One phrase they constantly use is "low effort" for men who are passive or submissive. They see them as LVM.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 02:52 PM
1

The difference is that unlike men, women can find a guy they’re not attracted to, to be high value. Then you misunderstand FDS. They say men you are not attracted to are LVM.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 02:50 PM
1

Here's one that was posted on the lounge recently: https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/glk50a/weekly_community_chat_megathread_17_may_2020/frbdz28/. That sub is FDS adjacent with many shared mods and users.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 02:48 PM
2

It does not have any more realistic goals than FDS. How is being able to have more of a non-finite resource less realistic than being able to have more of a finite, competitive, and numerically small resource? You speak as if women do not want to have sex with attractive men. TRP teaches men to be like guys that women are already having sex with. It doesn't teach them to change womens' opinion on who they should be having sex with.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 02:46 PM
1

A bad option is a man who will only have sex with them. It is a bad option for commitment but not sex. I'm saying there are men she want to have sex with (alpha fucks), and he becomes another one of those options. Many women don't mind a DB other than they don't like seeing their partners upset. Many women in deadbedrooms resent having to share a life with a man they do not find sexually attractive. How phases and sluttery is periodically broken up by relationships that form from sexual encounte…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 02:44 PM
1

A woman who uses her youth and attractiveness to share an alpha is still in a better position than having a beta to herself. The point is that no she isn't getting the ideal situation, but in the context of having any piece of an alpha or not - she gets the former.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 02:40 PM
0

The point is the possibility exists for women to have more sex, if they can be seduced. FDS literally thinks most men are trash and they can't change.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/20 09:03 PM
2

Banging hotties is the ideal, I don't think TRP says don't bang non-hotties if you can't get hotties. Bang who you can. Some men can bang hotties and others can't. The point is TRP actually has a possibility of meeting their goals. FDS literally can't do it because the numbers don't add up. Some FDSers can, but the vast majority can't do it simply due to arithmetic. The FDS chick needs to find one from a smaller pool. The TRP guy just needs to bang more than he was previously. If he was banging …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/20 09:01 PM
1

I think you are having a hard time understanding. I'm not saying all good looking men are HVM. But being good looking is a prerequisite to being HVM - which is what you just tacitly said in your first few sentences. The point of the OP is that by their own definitions of what HVM are, most FDS will fail in ever getting one. Because there aren't enough for more than just a minority of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/20 08:56 PM
1

More is a problem for women. Dating for men is about increasing options. For women, it's the opposite, it's about eliminating all the bad options. If those men are who women want to have sex with, then they are good options [for sex], not bad options. In women's mind, if he had to learn it on a website it's not the real him. So FDS women are fake too? I mean I learned how to do some woodworking from the internet. I don't see how real world consequences are fake. No one would ever say my current …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/20 08:54 PM
2

I think the point of contention is the submissiveness. HVM men put in effort correct? So submissive men are LVM.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/20 08:46 PM
1

I think that is contrary to FDS. If you search ugly, it is only talked about in conjunction with LVM. There are no mentions of a man being an ugly HVM. They even say don't give ugly men a chance. You can have whatever standards, just like having standards to what being a HVM is. I'm saying then that the majority of FDS will fail.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/20 08:44 PM
2

In your example, the man is getting pain from the divorce. The pain outweighs the benefit of the marriage, so it is a net loss. Sharing an alpha is just getting less of a good thing. She isn't being given a punishment, she is just missing out on all of the reward. Still a net positive.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/20 08:40 PM
1

They did have it previously though. Did you parse my sentence correctly? I said TRP isn't giving women anything new. Just more of what they already had. No, they are allowing men to fake something that women want. Fake in what way? If a man's mindset changes and then why is the new version of him fake rather than who he is now? No. They bemoan the lack of attractive men WILLING TO COMMIT to them. When looking for commitment. When talking about sex, women bemoan how there are more unattractive me…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/20 08:37 PM
3

You think it is harder to meet a goal of getting laid more than securing commitment from a HVM? Read my OP. TRPers actually have a shot, since everybody could always be having more sex. A cornerstone of FDS is that HVM are a minority. If it goes 1:1, then only a minority of women will ever be able to meet their goals.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/20 08:29 PM
7

There’s not enough women doing casual sex to make trp realistic The percentage is increasing every year. Is the percentage of HVM increasing or decreasing? Plus, the women having casual sex could always have more.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/20 08:28 PM
1

Look up "ugly" on FDS and get back to me. Your contention is that ugly men can be HVM?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/20 08:25 PM
3

The numbers don't add up.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/20 08:24 PM
6

Like I said, TRP actually has a shot of improving themselves and meeting their goals. By FDS's own standards, the vast majority will fail at what they are trying to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/20 08:24 PM
7

This is the definition I found for simp: A man that puts himself in a subservient/submissive position under women in hopes of winning them over, without the female bringing anything to the table. Hmmm, you may be right. So they want male pickmeishas. But I feel like they would disagree with a HVM being able to be submissive. Would FDSers really see submissiveness as a HVM trait?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/20 08:22 PM
2

TRP also says women would rather share and alpha than be with a beta, right? Now some women would agree, some may not. But by that metric, she is at least getting part of what she wants (an alpha), just not everything. She's not benefitting as much as she could have, but she's better off than before.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/20 08:17 PM
3

It isn't an accomplishment for her, but still something she wants right? If she didn't, she wouldn't be doing it right? I'm not saying TRP is giving women something they didn't have previously. I am saying they are allowing men who previously did not have what women wanted to now have something (not everything) a woman wants. I see women bemoaning the how disproportionate the pool of unattractive men is compared to attractive men, this helps solve that problem, no? She doesn't value the relation…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/20 08:06 PM
1

There are some men who are worthy of commitment, but not hot. Correct? Well making those men hot solves the problem, no? Bingo, my point is that most FDS will never get to do that because they claim HVM are an extreme minority.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/20 08:00 PM
2

You misunderstand FDS. Ask them if they want a sugar daddy. They look down on sugar daddies as LVM. They will take money from a man they don't want to have sex with - but they will never consider him HVM and say it is better to be alone. SD are buying a product, they are not beneficiaries. https://www.reddit.com/r/FemaleDatingStrategy/comments/eu3vk5/hot_tip_for_weeding_out_lvm_on_old_crosscheck/
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/20 07:56 PM
3

She has sex with a hotter guy than she was before. If she was having sex with an AFC and he becomes TRP, she no longer has to have sex with an AFC just for his resources (presumably the only reason AFC was getting laid at all). I would argue that there are women (many more these days), who aren't looking for commitment. They want to be single while having sex with hotter guys. Having a bunch of AFCs around doesn't help her in any way. But having hotter guys around, who won't bother her with aski…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/20 07:53 PM
6

But those simp men aren't HVM. Simps usually partake in porn or [digital] prostitution. They still don't benefit, in fact they might do worse since FDS really hates LVM. You think HVM simp?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/20 07:49 PM
2

You're upper middle class. The middle class is shrinking and the poor are doing a lot worse. They may have more gadgets, but that's it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/20 07:47 PM
6

The point is most FDSers can't get that because they say those men are a huge minority. So for most FDSers, they would have been better of just being single without engaging in the manhating that is part of FDS.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/20 07:44 PM
11

There are plenty of women who actively like casual sex. Not every woman is trying to be a housewife. Those women are benefitting.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/20 07:43 PM
1

I didn't say that was the female imperative. But women like having sex with men they find attractive, correct?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/20 07:42 PM
7

Sex is two sided. If an AFC found TRP and became more attractive to women, she is benefitting from a) not having the man be an AFC anymore, and b) having a hotter man than who her previous partner was.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/20 07:41 PM
3

I wouldn't have a problem with that. But to be honest, FDS in its current form is just a male hating sub with a thin veneer of self-help. Overlap with PinkPill and BlackPillFeminism shows this. If that's all they asked for without demeaning men who can't or don't want to do that, then I don't think there would be any animosity from those who dislike FDS at all. But it feels like those women can't help but hate men. Ideally, FDS would somehow benefit the HVM men they do end up with as well. But I…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/20 07:40 PM
2

That's what I meant by the execution being the problem. There are just way too many TRPers and it isn't exactly centralized, so you have rogue elements. But at its core, all TRP is about is getting more sex. While pumping and dumping does benefit men more than women, there are many women (especially those that would go for TRP) that are more into casual sex. At the very least, those women are benefitting from having a larger pool of mates that they would willingly have casual sex with. The polit…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/20 07:34 PM
1

I would agree that TRP doesn't serve the female imperative completely. It can't, because then it would just end up being FDS. But my point was that TRP actually provides some benefits to women in the form of becoming men that women already seem to choose to be having sex with. FDS doesn't provide anything similar to men (not that they have to).
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/20 07:20 PM
5

They are chasing HVM. Or at least "chasing" in the way women do by trying to attract them. If they wanted to be single all they would have to do is not date anyone. But they do want to date, just HVM which they have thus far been unable to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/20 07:12 PM
1

Why can't this be its own thread? It is presenting new ideas.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/20 11:02 PM
5

Look at this thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/FemaleDatingStrategy/comments/f1owop/the_percentage_of_hvm_out_of_all_the_male/. To me, it has been very clear that HVM are objectively a small proportion of the male population according to FDS. I don't think you can speak for FDS either then. I'd love to see material from FDS saying otherwise. From what I understand, FDS says there is a small segment of men called HVM. Now each individual woman won't be attracted to every man there, but that pool o…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/20 11:01 PM
2

You misunderstand FDS then. They say that only an extreme minority of men are HVM. If your HVM is your sister's LVM, then neither LVM nor HVM exist. Or LVM can turn into HVM, and vice versa. They are very specific on what makes a HVM. I searched for percentage on FDS and found this: https://www.reddit.com/r/FemaleDatingStrategy/comments/f1owop/the_percentage_of_hvm_out_of_all_the_male/. The top most answer with an actual percentage said 3-7% of the global male population. Most of the male popula…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/20 10:30 PM
2

This is a moot point because it is clear that you aren't an FDSer, but you aren't even defending their position faithfully. following certain rules entitle you 100% to reaching some goal, then yes, you’re gonna be really disappointed in life. That's a straw man. How many HVM do you think there are in the world? Last time I read FDS, they said 5%. So if 95% of followers are going to fail, the rules don't even make sense. That's more like a cult. And that is assuming the 5% of women are all on FDS…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/20 10:05 PM
6

If a women is content being single, I have no idea what she gains from marriage besides children. If being with a HVM beats being single, then what she gains is whatever the HVM offer. That is everything that the single woman is missing out on. It is weird because it is setting yourself up for failure. A woman finds FDS and she is told behave a certain way. But at the end of the day, she has to behave that way knowing the most likely scenario is that she won't reach the "goal". That'd be like be…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/20 09:43 PM
14

That means the vast majority of women will fall short of that goal and fail, correct? The goal for the vast majority of women then is to be content being single. It is just weird that the goal is something the vast majority will fail at. At least TRP has a chance of everyone meeting that goal. Theoretically, every man in the world could be getting more sex. But there just aren't enough HVM and FDS doesn't do anything to increase their numbers.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/20 09:34 PM
31

FDS says being unmarried is better than being married to a LVM. So the long term goal seems to be "be fulfilled/happy/whatever". It isn't necessarily marriage. And seeing the way they talk about men and saying the vast majority of men are LVM - logically this means the vast majority of women would be better off unmarried rather than married according to FDS.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/20 09:19 PM
6

I didn't know too much about that case so I looked it up on Wiki. Bennett said that after the encounter he began to feel "extremely confused, mortified, and disgusted".[9] Bennett's lawyer wrote that in the years after the incident, Bennett was so traumatized that his job performance, income, and mental health declined.[1] They first met when Bennett played Argento's son in the 2004 film The Heart Is Deceitful Above All Things when Bennett was seven years old. Yeah, sure sounds consensual to me.…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/20 07:30 PM
1

Life is fair in this particular situation, you're almost as ugly on the outside as you are on the inside. Hair's difference though.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 01:20 AM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PxQjAd-1m_s
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/20 07:49 PM
3

How many STDs?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 08:44 PM
2

k
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 08:18 PM
5

Yes. Here goes the "guess I found the"
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 08:16 PM
1

I want to believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 03:03 AM
2

And it spreads to other poor bastards. If you don't stamp it out, then everyone will get it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 02:54 AM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h_9ATQFgu9o
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 02:50 AM
2

Do you believe a white nationalist state will solve gender relations problems, or do you just not like non-whites?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 02:43 AM
1

No, that just means you can be used to get free dinners/drinks. Being able to translate the first date into multiple dates without having to pay is the real test for normal range.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/20 02:51 AM
2

Ugly people have good looking siblings all the time. Look at trufemcels, there's tons of "my parents/siblings are hot, why am I ugly?". And that is with the female looks handicap due to thirsty men. Think about all the ugly guys with hot sisters, or when one fraternal twin is inexplicably significantly less good looking.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/20 02:27 AM
2

If being a chad was as easy as getting plastic surgery, we wouldnt even have TRP. It isn't like TRP is poor, they are more likely to be upper middle class than lower middle class.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/20 02:25 AM
3

That's actually easily explained, they call it "punching up". To them, black people are victims of white people like women are victims of men. Victims can complain.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/20 05:41 PM
1

That's only due to technological advancement. Socially things are deteriorating. It is also isn't true everywhere. There are many places in the world that are objectively doing way worse today.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/20 09:01 PM
1

That's already what women say...
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/20 08:59 PM
1

Every time the female led divorce filing is brought up, some woman tries to blame it on men. Newsflash, lesbian women have higher rates of divorce than straight couples or gay men. The issue is women, stop trying to blame everything on men. Women can have faults too. You could just as easily say men are more likely to cheat because it is women who experience loss in libidos throughout marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/20 08:56 PM
2

Are you looking at your own source? http://www.sprc.org/sites/default/files/Slide20.PNG Here Asian are near the bottom at like 7%. http://www.sprc.org/sites/default/files/Slide21_0.PNG Here they are the bottom. What are you looking at?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 05:05 PM
1

Right, countering your point about race, being well off, and being more unhappy. Latinos are in the middle financially and suicide rate wise. Honestly, the only people to buck the trend are white people. I don't think it is a coincidence that they are the main drivers of feminism. It's almost like that has a bigger effect than quality of life.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 05:00 PM
3

Women seem much more angry at the men in my example than yours, even though it is them being taken advantage of.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 04:56 PM
3

But Asians aren’t... so the race thing doesn’t make sense. You think poor white people are happier than rich white people? Or that poor black people are happier than rich black people?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 04:22 PM
3

That’s stupid. Then why aren’t poorer people happier than richer people in their own country? You think poor people in the US are happier than the rich?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 02:31 PM
24

If a 25 year old woman marries a 65 year old man, the manipulator is most likely the woman. Women always give other women a pass on how manipulative they really are.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 02:27 PM
1

You should look at usernames - I'm not the same person who made that claim. I simply corrected your ludicrous statement that colonization could be considered "revenge" of any kind since it is clear they would have done it whether they were wronged or not. While the other poster's claim is fairly ridiculous too, his seemed a lot more tongue in cheek and actually makes a bit more sense. The reason France has a large number of Muslim immigrants is due to their colonization of North Africa. Algeria …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/20 07:43 PM
1

Actually, if you look up why Islam as a civilization succeeded at the time that it did, it was because of Roman/Byzantine invasion weakening ME states. So yes, in a way. But I was just mostly correcting your egregiously incorrect claim that it "at the end the bad guys are the Muslims", considering they are relatively newcomers to the arena. It is also ridiculous to think that colonization was any sort of revenge or justified. It was done to people Europe was never harmed by. Did Europe have any …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/20 06:44 PM
1

Islam was founded around 622. Europe was fucking around the ME and Africa long before then. What you said is clearly false.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/20 04:32 PM
1

Every man here doesn't talk about Chad. The ones that do are prob discussing TRP, the purpose of this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/20 11:18 PM
1

Huh. For some reason I thought you'd be hotter than you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/19 08:28 PM
1

That actually does happen though. How many stories are there of eastern men coming here and basically making the woman do what he wants? Then there are black western men who are like the native cognates. I personally know many couples like that. There aren't too many middle eastern men in the manosphere - it is largely white men with some Asian men. And Asian culture isn't particularly masculine. An eastern man can pretty much act like he does back home - wear what he wants, go out whenever he w…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/19 01:24 PM
1

That's still says more about western men than western women. Bring a eastern woman here and she'll cuck a desperate Westerner - take a western woman to the east and see if she can pull the same shit she does here. Hint she can't.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/19 09:39 PM
1

Because those are women too. It speaks to the human condition. That's like asking why should I care if some guy from Jamaica is the fastest man in the world. The biggest difference between those women and you is that you benefit from living in a society of Western men. If you were transported to Saudi Arabia, you couldn't do shit and would live just like them. Meanwhile there are more men in the US who can live like men like SA in their own little societies than women in SA who can like women he…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/19 01:39 PM
7

Western men are pussies, no argument there. The fact remains that in the present day many, many, many places exist where men can dictate exactly how women live their lives and the gender reversed version of Saudi Arabia/Iran does not exist, and in all likelihood probably can't ever exist. So yeah, there exist men who want to and there exist men who got what they wanted. The women there, not so much.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/19 10:44 PM
9

Men are needed to maintain it. If men wanted the world to become a totalitarian hellhole, women couldn't do anything about it. There are places in the world right now where women basically live at the mercy of men. The reverse isn't true anywhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/19 09:20 PM
11

This thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/19 03:39 PM
2

I thought men still ruled the world and were responsible for all the bad that came with that?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/19 03:30 PM
5

You just ignore points that prove you wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/19 03:28 PM
4

Women actually divorce more when they are married to other women. I think they experience more domestic abuse too.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/19 03:27 PM
-1

Right, because men make the rules for this world and women just live here.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/19 02:54 PM
9

But lesbian marriages break down more often... the common denominator is women.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/19 02:53 PM
11

So then it isn't really about men and women. Apparently low T men would be better people than high T men. All we have to do is lower testosterone levels for everyone, including lesbian women. Also, it's good to know that lesbian women are worse people than straight women.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/19 01:50 PM
10

Your post was about women and men. Lesbian women are women.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/19 01:41 PM
4

But we are talking about macro trends. Oh, the unhealthy women must be with unhealthy men. Meanwhile the wives with unemployed men must be put upon and not themselves be unemployed. Like only the situation where the husbands are in are their faults too, meanwhile the situation regarding wives are just more of them being the victims.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/19 06:03 PM
1

If god was a woman, how come her religions never made it as big as male ones? Check mate wiccans
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/19 05:44 PM
7

Your entire post is giving the benefit of the doubt to women while taking the worst case scenario for men. Typical. More men bad, women good bs.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/19 05:33 PM
1

Are you older than 35? That is such an odd point of view. Women routinely talk about their preferences to make men feel bad about not meeting them.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/19 05:53 PM
3

But why just limit it to PPD? That makes no sense other than to fit your narrative. Go do a Twitter search or in real life. It isn't just exclusive to PPD, people talk about their preferences and other people's preferences all the time. Men are insulted here for not liking high n count girls here all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/19 05:47 PM
3

Low value men may shame some women a lot, but most women shame men.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/19 05:40 PM
3

I mean men get attacked for the bad actions of other men... But anyway this question was about people in general, not just here. No, even in the language you are using. For women it is insults, but for men it is just pushback. Try pretending to be a man and say you don't like fat girls and see the insults you get. They may be different types of insults, like "no woman would want you anyway" - stuff like they, but they won't be any less caustic.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/19 05:39 PM
3

I haven't seen your posts, so I can't say, but a lot of women do that. Maybe not in PPD, but in real life for sure. Type in short men in Twitter search to see what I am talking about. I assume people downvoting you is because your argument doesn't hold water when thought out, rather than downvoting some preference.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/19 05:30 PM
5

Pretty much every man understands women prefer tall men, it is some women who try to deny it. Women say insulting things about short men, albeit maybe without realizing that it is insulting, and then when there is pushback they cry "omigosh I can't even say I like tall men?!" I'd like to meet one nonblue man here who would deny women in general do not prefer tall men. It is probably the most common preference.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/19 05:24 PM
1

I agree. But a lot of people don't see the male perspective as important, or they just see it as plain wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 03:41 PM
10

I got the impression she was saying women don't see it that way and therefore feel that men are wrong for seeing it that way or feeling bad about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 03:27 PM
1

I didn't have that expectation. That's why I pointed it out, to give her a different perspective.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/19 07:35 AM
4

This but unironically.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/19 04:46 AM
1

My response was to her speculation to what she could have done if she were born a man. That isn't truly putting herself in mens' shoes. She isn't considering what her life would be like if everything were the same besides her being a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/19 05:46 PM
1

Women are treated nicer, are more likely to be helped, have lower expectations, etc. Like I said, it's a million little things, but it is hard to say which of those specifically because I don't know you personally. But in general, women receive much more support from society than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/19 05:53 AM
1

See you still keep misunderstanding the point even though I have spelled it out. Didn't I already tell you that I wasn't comparing your life to your brothers. Take one second to understand that point rather than having a knee jerk reaction. My point is that if you were born a man you would still have been the eldest and gone through all of the abuse you went through, the difference being that you would be a man instead of woman in that position and therefore would receive less support than you d…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/19 05:28 AM
1

First of all, I'm not TRP, so I think your assumptions betray your positions. I've already made my point, women in general are more supported by society. You are a woman, ergo more supported by society than if you were a man. It's a very simple point. If you were born a man, you would not have had that support and therefore would have had a harder time. I said your life is easier than if you were born a man, not easy in general. You are arguing an argument you made up in your head rather than wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/19 05:02 AM
1

Society in general is more supportive of women than men. Millions of little things. I don't know your life so I can't give specifics. But in general, women in general are more supported by society. Oftentimes unnoticed.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/19 04:34 AM
2

If you were born a man you would have had to deal with the same abuse, but would have received far less support. That's the point. It's not comparing your situation to your brothers, but if you were born as a brother in your stead.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/19 04:16 AM
1

They had it harder probably, because women are more supported in our society and generally have it easier when considering the challenges men have.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/19 03:58 AM
1

You made it through better because you are a woman and didn't have the same challenges they did.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/19 03:27 AM
3

Why don't you think you'd end up like your brothers, who are the closest genetic male version of you? I think you are overestimating how well you could "man".
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/19 02:31 AM
5

Yeah, men would take both if they could. They have to settle for porn.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/19 06:55 PM
1

How "high paying"?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/19 05:18 PM
1

Do you think this holds for same sex dynamics as well? I don't think there's anything inherently predatory about male sexuality, it is just how it needs to be used to deal with the sexual nature of women. Otherwise we'd have the lesbian bed death for straight couples, which already happens for straights as we get older or women completely control the relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/19 05:27 PM
-1

Were either of you single parents?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/19 06:24 PM
2

I'd say it's about half. Still have most of Asia, Africa, & Middle East.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/19 06:46 PM
1

Europe, Aus/NZL, North America, South America and Southeast Asia (if you're a white expat) are really the only places this makes sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/19 06:38 PM
8

That must be why the divorce rate is so high.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 04:53 PM
1

I feel like we all just witnessed a slut origin story here on PPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/19 04:10 AM
2

And the men receive flack for it. So OP should equally be branded as TRPers are. Either TRPers are right or OP is wrong, otherwise it is a double standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/19 04:59 PM
1

I just went there - there's less "attacking" posts than circlejerking. And the "attacking" posts were no more snarky than the posts women here make.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/19 04:43 PM
1

What comments are you referring to? You do realize the vast majority of the removed comments were by women who were circlejerking and couldn't keep it automod?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/19 04:34 PM
1

Hmm, we may have looked at a similar one, because the only one that I saw along those lines compared men and women at ages 16 and 18, and the reason for the lack of correlation for women was because women had a higher correlation of height at 16 to 18 than men did (women stopped growing at age 16 more often than men, which is commonly known). The correlation difference was something like .99 vs .92. They compared IQ differences between 16 and 18 to see the difference in IQ after growth in height…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 01:24 AM
1

Where did I say they had no bearing or survival or sexual success? But they played a role in those particular environments, such as light skin in Europe due to the low light levels. Again, due to dispute that environmental factors created the different races? Do you not see how that is different than sex which was there from the creation of humanity?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 01:20 AM
1

Men on average are taller and have a higher IQ than women, probably as a result of the height-intelligence correlation (if height is controlled for, women have a higher average IQ).[27] The Trivers–Willard hypothesis suggests that female mammals are able to adjust offspring sex ratio in response to their maternal condition; a suggested generalization is that bigger and taller human parents are likely to have more sons than the average.[27][28] As those traits are considered desirable in mates of…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 01:13 AM
7

when we got to a motel room, she said no several times. When I tried to grab her in a sexual way she grabbed my hand and forcefully threw it away from her, twice. I chugged a beer and gave her another. Gross. came out and was a bit more forceful with my kissing and hands down the pants, and everything went fine Gross. What is your interpretation of why things "went fine" after being more forceful?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/19 07:13 AM
6

Gross...
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/19 06:52 AM
2

Because it proves that racial differences aren't intrinsic to humanity while gender differences are. We'll all eventually become one race due to intermarriage. We won't become one mixed gender. At best, if you're right, one gender will die off. Still think it's BS though. If one entire race goes extinct today, we'll survive with practically no difference. If men go extinct today, humanity most likely won't survive, and even if they do humanity will be drastically different. The search didn't say…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/19 03:47 AM
1

Now you're just being obtuse. Ok, let's say that has never happened in history in any noticable form while the change in races has. At the very least my point about the difference in sex being there from the birth of humanity is true. Source for the scientific consensus?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/19 03:01 AM
1

Genetic factors influenced by what? Oh right, the environment, however many generations ago. Men and women were genetically different from the birth of the human species, not true for the different races. You take a white kid to Africa and his descendants will eventually be dark skinned. There is no environment you can take a female so her female descendants eventually grow a dick.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/19 02:51 AM
1

You know how different human races evolved, yes? Another difference I forgot was that races can easily mix, a half man half woman like a Klinefelter's or XXY is a genetic abnormality and usually sterile.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/19 02:29 AM
2

Comparing race to gender is asinine. Any differences in race are due to environmental factors, however far back you need to go. Sex differences are intrinsic to the human species. Men and women have been different since the birth of humans at the very least. All the different races didn't even exist at the birth of the human species. The Civil Rights movement included whites, at best men can be feminist allies who try to help women, not themselves. Different races are not at odds with each other…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/19 01:38 AM
1

It wasn't artificially maintained, the current system is artificial - women have to be given advantages because they couldn't earn them. If all the policies in favor of women were redacted, we would return to male dominance very quickly. The handicaps women require are what is keeping them competitive. Which is why I said men letting their guard down is what got them here, but in the future it will get even worse. They bought into giving advantages to women because they felt sorry for them. I al…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 11:08 PM
2

Feminists demand preferential treatment for women or lower standards for women to right past injustices, which stymies the achievements of modern day men who were not responsible for those past injustices. Whether it be scholarships, women only programs, or quotas for them. They have manipulated the justice system to be harsher on men than women, and continually seek advantages for women. The differences in parental rights being one example. They vilify men so that they have confidence or self e…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 10:49 PM
1

No I didn't, you purposefully ignored what I wrote to argue your point, not that I'm surprised. That was literally last on my list. You don't have to go from perfect to worst for things to get worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 10:37 PM
5

Oh no!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 10:35 PM
3

Hope you are
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 10:32 PM
1

I'm mixed Asian/Hispanic Meaningless to you because you're not a man Feminism constantly berates men and guilt trips them. It promotes advantages for women at the expense of men. It places the needs of women above those of men and guides society to enforce that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 10:30 PM
4

Someone who hasn't been here for years even though they complain about this sub endlessly
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 10:25 PM
4

I'll tell you mine if you tell me yours. Decreasing relative quality of life, achievement, and happiness.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 10:20 PM
2

Well I'm not white. Are you? Individuals make up a demographic, and the percentage of guys getting screwed over is increasing rapidly. It hasn't happened to my family yet, but I see the writing on the wall and see it affecting my male descendants/relatives in the near future if things continue as they are. I can see it happening to tons of other guys in real life all the time. It is gonna affect almost all males eventually.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 10:16 PM
5

Yeah, you're too good for this place. Maybe you should see yourself out.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 10:10 PM
6

Says a woman
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 10:03 PM
1

For western women, but men are getting screwed over.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 10:03 PM
8

It is foolish to say not to worry about what they do/think. Letting the guard down is what got us into this mess in the first place. It isn't like things can't get worse in the future for guys, and if the feminists have their way - they will.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 09:56 PM
10

Feminists literally say men being their allies will fix their issues too. Obviously it is a lie, but they still do try to fool men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 09:48 PM
6

I mean, cuckold's are cucks by choice too...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 09:45 PM
11

It's not readily apparent as shit though, they do try to dress it up and hide it. The more proper analogy would be a sandwich that fell on the floor but the dirt hidden by the other slice of bread.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 09:33 PM
5

Poor bastard...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 09:31 PM
51

Feminists lie about it and claim it is really egalitarianism. Some people believe it, due to the women are wonderful effect.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 09:22 PM
0

I meant less pressure on blue collar people, they care less about reputation and don't experience the same sort of upbringing that may enforce those norms
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 08:32 PM
3

Less societal pressure on them and less to lose, I presume
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 07:25 PM
0

Because they care less about being sluts
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 06:34 PM
8

She's gonna say they don't take the men up on those offers
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 05:29 PM
16

At best, they admit to lower numbers of partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 05:21 PM
23

60k is only rich in rural areas.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 05:06 PM
10

The average woman goes to college and sleeps around - or sleeps around as a young blue collar thot. I dont know the percentages, but I would bet only about 15-20% fall outside of that norm.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 05:05 PM
1

Oh god, moms like this are the worst. The whole "mother knows best mentality". This is why dad was my favorite parent. Moms over parent in the worst way and could learn a lot from male parenting styles.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 04:59 PM
27

Ok, sounds like you are ignoring point 3 for women - that is a huge issue these days. Also, you should add a point for no single mothers. That reduces the "large" number of good women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 04:51 PM
0

Are you black?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 03:28 AM
2

"Mystery" solved.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/19 03:45 PM
3

Are you a tall white guy?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/19 04:28 AM
3

Soyboy is about vegetarians who loudly eschew eating meat. I would agree that eating meat is expected of a man. But it doesn't shame eating vegetables, just ONLY eating vegetables.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/19 06:10 PM
4

Somebody go tell Popeye he's a pussy.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/19 05:09 PM
6

A lot of women confuse men doing one with the other too.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/19 08:27 PM
1

If you asked guys if they wanted a girl who slept with 2 big dicked Chads or 20 small dicked betas, I bet they would pick the first one every time. I have no idea how you came up with your narrative, we could even make a thread about this and I am confident I would be right. You're also assuming guys with big dicks or good at sex don't care about dating sluts.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/19 02:23 AM
1

Child marriage isn't the norm though. That's sensationalized here. And I think you have Saudi Arabia confused with all ME countries.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/19 10:21 PM
1

Have you ever left the Western world? You sound like you get your information from sensationalized news.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/19 10:05 PM
8

More like "stop blaming men for your own choices". What happened to "women would rather be single than get with a bad guy"? Obviously they don't consider these sorts of men "bad" [enough].
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/19 06:40 PM
1

Maybe it's just my area but there are TONS of lower class women on Tinder. They're leaking into Bumble recently too.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/19 09:23 PM
1

You're the one who asked for his anecdotes, why do that if you're just gonna be an asshole about it?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/19 07:27 PM
3

...being unsuccessful and needing others to care for you in the aftermath is a bigger mess than being dead and having some body fluids on the floor. Guys don't want to risk somebody needing to look after them if they can't kill themselves right.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/19 06:55 PM
2

How many years ago was that study published? I'm sure it's above 75k by now
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/18 05:44 PM
8

Wow, these days if you haven't had at least 30 partners you're apparently an incel. What a world.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/18 04:57 PM
18

Dude, he was just trying to tear down your boyfriend in a desperate attempt to get your attention. The old "if you were with me, I'd treat you like a princess" gambit pathetic men use. Should be pretty transparent.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/18 05:01 PM
1

The difference in damage to the body after having a kid has to be at least a small part of this issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/18 12:38 AM
1

Wow, you do seem like a happy person!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/18 02:06 AM
0

Well if you don't have to worry about retribution from his side of the family, you could just cheat and ride the CC.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/18 05:02 PM
1

Yeah, 26 is hard, over the hump of 25. Sucks
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/18 03:48 PM
1

Is your fiance ex Muslim too?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/18 03:46 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter