TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

worthextension28273 Archive

View 0 posts and 57 comments by worthextension28273 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Unique dna doesnt mean something isnt part of their body. Their mitochondria also have unique dna.
/r/MensRights18/10/22 04:53 AM
0

? Its literally not consent under the law. You do realise giving consent doesnt just mean someone says yes? If someone is blackout drunk and u have sex with them, no matter what they say or do, you have raped them.
/r/MensRights13/10/22 02:33 AM
1

Thats not giving consent.
/r/MensRights13/10/22 12:02 AM
0

What lies?
/r/MensRights13/10/22 12:00 AM
1

Psychologically you cant consent once alcohol effects your mind to a certain extent.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 11:59 PM
-2

I was talking about inmate on inmate rapes as well
/r/MensRights12/10/22 11:58 PM
-3

Lol when you dont have a counter argument. I thought men were meant to be good at logic
/r/MensRights12/10/22 12:25 PM
3

Yeah ive read a few. It seems like a big problem with some rape studies is that they dont count forced to penetrate as rape. That obviously skews the stats
/r/MensRights12/10/22 11:58 AM
5

Thanks 👍
/r/MensRights12/10/22 11:56 AM
3

Evidence?
/r/MensRights12/10/22 11:51 AM
-4

Lol how do mothers circumvent the law?
/r/MensRights12/10/22 11:48 AM
-13

Marxism is based
/r/MensRights12/10/22 11:47 AM
-1

Blame creepy men not the women.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 11:46 AM
-34

The vast majority of prison rapes are still perpetrated by males.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 11:45 AM
0

So the problems arent with the current laws then.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 12:54 AM
0

Not if they're intoxicated to the point that they're not considered able to have sex under the law.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 10:41 PM
1

I didnt say that drinking wasnt allowed at all. I said if someones intoxicated to the point that they cant grant consent according to a legal standard.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 10:40 PM
0

Any evidence for that claim?
/r/MensRights11/10/22 10:36 PM
1

I think the current laws are sufficient. The prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendent is guilty.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 10:08 PM
1

Well then i disagree with her, i believe the standard should be non gender based.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 09:58 PM
1

Yeah i agree
/r/MensRights11/10/22 09:58 PM
1

But he's saying if your drunk and someone forces you to have sex, its the victims fault because they got drunk?
/r/MensRights11/10/22 09:52 PM
1

Because the standard for giving sexual consent is much higher and therefore more effected by alcohol comparatively. Regardless, the law is the law whether or not you agree with it. Rape is a legal concept anyways.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 09:04 PM
1

I am a women how do i hate them?
/r/MensRights11/10/22 09:02 PM
1

No because the outcome has been different in different cases.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 09:01 PM
1

The law is not gender specific and is the same for men and women. I am correct.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 09:00 PM
1

Law for what, rape? Or the law about intoxication?
/r/MensRights11/10/22 09:00 PM
1

And plenty of real rapes are not prosecuted because of lack of evidence.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 08:59 PM
1

Then your giving extra attention to a minority of radicals.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 08:58 PM
-2

Yeah im kinda shocked tbh
/r/MensRights11/10/22 08:57 PM
1

Its not ba based, its based on a legal test. The burden of proof is on the prosecution.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 08:56 PM
1

Including male victims?
/r/MensRights11/10/22 08:55 PM
2

Any empirical evidence?
/r/MensRights11/10/22 08:54 PM
1

I was talking about the law
/r/MensRights11/10/22 02:45 PM
1

No and the courts dont believe they should
/r/MensRights11/10/22 02:36 PM
0

Im talking about the law, which where i live is the same for both men and women.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 02:09 PM
0

Then its complicated and depends on the specific circumstances. In most of those cases neither person would press charges.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 01:53 PM
1

If a man meets that standard and initiates sex, and the women voluntarily goes along. Then the women may be guilty of rape as she could consent but he couldn't.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 01:35 PM
2

The standard is if you're intoxicated to the point that you cant give informed consent.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 01:34 PM
-1

The standard is the same for men and women under the law
/r/MensRights11/10/22 01:27 PM
1

Lol u obviously dont work in the legal system. In fact, rapes are under reported and often unsuccessful in court because it's so hard to get evidence. If you're not drunk and a girl is its rape. Surely u agree in that circumstance.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 12:37 PM
1

If you are also blackout drunk then it gets more complicated and will depend on the circumstances. And yes, its difficult to prove who initiated, the burden of proof will be on the prosecution
/r/MensRights11/10/22 12:15 PM
-3

If shes drunk and you're not, if u voluntarily have sex with her, even if she initiated, u are at fault as u did not gain her consent. The situation would be different if you were also intoxicated to the point that u could not give consent.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 12:12 PM
1

I live in australia and here women have been found guilty of rape
/r/MensRights11/10/22 12:10 PM
4

So if a women gave consent prior and maintained that consent during the act, she cant retrospectively withdraw that consent after the completion of the act.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 12:09 PM
1

Im only talking about the legal interpretation. Where i live (australia) if the accused thought to the standard of a reasonable person that consent had been granted and that they had taken steps to attain consent, its not rape.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 12:08 PM
0

I just explained why.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 11:39 AM
1

Otherwise you're basically saying if you're extremely drunk and cant consent a guy could just rape you and its not rape.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 11:00 AM
-2

Legally you. It was you acting ie driving the car. Your friend didnt act upon u. In regards to sex, its the guy acting upon the girl.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 11:00 AM
-12

I was talking about if you decide to drink and then a man initiates sex with you. In that case its rape because the onus is on the man to gain consent and someone under the influence cant grant it.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 10:30 AM
-31

So you're victim blaming?
/r/MensRights11/10/22 10:19 AM
2

If both are drunk the person who initiates sex is the rapist. I live in australia where rape laws are codified and thus women can also rape. Obviously i think the laws in the uk should be reformed.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 09:28 AM
-33

So you're saying getting raped is a consquence for a womens actions of drinking?
/r/MensRights11/10/22 08:58 AM
-46

It depends who initiated the sex and the relative degrees of drunkness. If both parties are drunk and mutually initiated then usually neither would want to press charges .
/r/MensRights11/10/22 08:58 AM
8

Why would this not be rape?
/r/MensRights11/10/22 07:49 AM
-56

If a person is drunk to where they can no longer give consent its always rape.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 07:02 AM
10

It would be rape
/r/MensRights11/10/22 07:01 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter