TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

wq73 Archive

View 0 posts and 44 comments by wq73 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

BP swings too hard in the other direction. Studies show that looks matter a lot but they aren't the only thing that matters and that's kind of what I subscribe to.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 05:17 PM
1

spot on. RP is a reaction to a society that rejects the importance that hierarchies and physical attractiveness have on relationship outcomes, yet as humans tend to always do the reaction is in the complete opposite direction rather than bringing things to the truth where personality and looks both matter and where different people are benevolent and selfish.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 01:49 AM
1

Agreed but which idealogical sub isn't just bitching where nothing gets done?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 06:46 PM
1

I disagree with the notion that you can predict any significant evolutionary changes based on behavioral changes in sexual dimorphism over no more than 9-10 generations. 200 years of change is just not sufficient evidence either way.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 06:44 PM
2

Cool. I'd be pretty pissed if someone didn't bring it up before date 5-8 because that's a pretty big compatibility measurement, glad you're not doing that
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 04:56 AM
1

Dumping you? How far into dating do you share this? For being such a non-norm I would consider past 2-3 dates to be kind of fucked up
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 02:47 AM
2

Slutty men are usually proud of fucking around and assume women will find it impressive and attractive if he says he isn’t “experienced”. Isn't experienced or is experienced?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 02:40 AM
1

I guess in a sense both, did you join the discord server with any intention or notion of getting into a online relationship? And what drew your interest into a online relationship? Did you have hesitancies about being long distance? And are you still with your discord boyfriend?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 02:23 AM
1

I'm sorry... discord server? Can you tell me more about how that happens and what draws your interest to that kind of thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 02:18 AM
3

Slightly off topic but I'm interested in knowing which parts of TRP specifically which you agree with?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 02:09 AM
1

I mean not untrue, especially if you look at the speed dating studies on stated preferences vs chosen preferences (ask women to state their preferences, then choose who they would see again, then rate all the men they met on the same preferences) it definitely tells a certain story. I'm not surprised at all if the same thing applies to men. Humans suck at understanding their own motivations
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 12:37 AM
2

It might seem like ammunition but in reality it's genuine unawareness that emotional attractiveness isn't a given in women. I see a lot of women listing men's standards and most of them don't have "facially attractive" in it. I don't think that's malicious, simply an assumption on women's part that men struggle to understand. Same thing applies in reverse
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 01:40 PM
2

when men list the things they find attractive, they list physical traits that are visible, because the behavioral traits are kinda obvious and don't need to be said out loud. When women list things they find attractive, they list behavioral traits instead, assuming that physical traits don't need to be said out loud. Wow I never thought about it like that but it makes way too much sense. Womens' standards often have physical attractiveness as an unlisted given and vice versa for men with emotion…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 01:37 PM
3

Huh as a man I'm exposed to the exact opposite. I guess it really does depend on your perspective
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 01:34 PM
1

Yeah I completely agree. The studies on speed dating are so evident that what people say they're attracted to and what they are actually attracted to is wildly different. Women and men both rated physical attractiveness far lower than it was actually prioritized
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 01:31 PM
1

There seems to be a pervasive idea that good looks cause a better life, but I'd argue it could be the opposite. We know facial attractiveness is correlated with better heart health, gut health, immune system, etc. Facial attraction is theorized as a way for human brains to identify who has better physical and even mental health through correlation with facial features. It could be that being predisposed to a poorer life quality could be reflected through less attractive facial features.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 01:12 AM
1

Actions of a large uncoordinated group are almost always multicausal and in this case said group is definitely not a monolith.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 07:52 PM
1

Whether it's purposeful or genuine ignorance is anyone's guess and probably depends on the person. I think you are generally right though
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 10:24 AM
1

Either you can pick up the signal or you can't. No one can tell you how to. Are you neurodivergent by any chance?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 10:19 AM
1

High schoolers can be 18 so not necessarily
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 10:16 AM
1

Completely agree with the reality of the situation but "This is a cut-and-dry example of a woman being the problem" is just ridiculous. Reducing the reality of how people approach sex to "women are the problem" is just reductionist to literally no one's benefit. Let's assume women are "the problem", what does anyone in the world do with this information? If you only focus on what the world should be you lose sight on what we actually live in today, and it makes you worse off at making prediction…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 10:13 AM
1

I don't think the audience this post is for will be receptive to its message
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 03:23 AM
2

This post is completely incomprehensible and the last sentence completely threw me off of where I was expecting this to go
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 03:20 AM
1

This is pulling in like 3 different directions and the last sentence threw me off completely. I have no idea what your actual point is, genuinely
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 03:19 AM
–

Amen. I don't talk to women who I think are promiscuous and I get to not be a hypocrite because I practice that myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 01:43 AM
1

money is a modicum of trade but I get your point, in actuality it's rarely the same
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 01:27 AM
1

It's not a zero sum game. Thus the comparative plights of men and women are irrelevant, they only matter in their own contexts as issues to be addressed. It's not like class division where the plight of have-nots is directly causal to the benefit of haves
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 01:25 AM
1

the fact that households without wealth tend to do it more? You're conflating normative and descriptive takes on this situation
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 01:07 AM
1

Most modern psychologists accept that the phenomenon Freud described: some men struggling to integrate affection and sexual desire toward the same woman - is real. However, virtually no mainstream psychologist today accepts Freud’s explanation of it which was rooted in Oedipal theory. Freud had a bunch of bunk explanations for things but modern psychology generally accepts that this phenomenon exists.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 06:13 PM
3

Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 06:11 PM
2

No no like the guy was still respectful despite approaching without you giving signals
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 06:09 PM
1

There is no proof the madonna whore complex even exists I don't think I can have a reasonable debate off of this basis. I would suggest to do your own research but I'm sure you won't
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 10:31 AM
1

Look up Madonna-whore complex. Extremely under-discussed in relation to women but very real phenomenon
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 10:24 AM
1

I think this sort of mentality from women, to hold back sexuality for men they deem more important or want to commit to, is a female equivalent of Madonna-whore complex and is dangerous for its own reasons. A man with Madonna-whore complex should not be compelled to have sex with women he respects in the same way women should not. If the response to this phenomena is a demand for behavior then it's the wrong response. But me personally, I would rather avoid those types of women because they tend…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 10:23 AM
1

How is someone supposed to respond to "what do you think an average woman looks like?" 😭 like, average? You want them to attach a gif or something?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 10:10 AM
1

Genuine question, have you had anyone approach you when you were NOT giving signals but was still respectful? How did you respond to it and how did you feel about it?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 10:06 AM
6

She was being honest. Honestly I have thought the same when being approached by extremely unattractive women. Like I feel bad for thinking it at the same time but in a sense it's like "at least understand the concept of leagues"
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 10:03 AM
0

Whenever anyone says women prefer "dominant" men (using that specific word), you can always clock that it's a dude saying it. Women will say "confident" or "a leader" or "a guy with a backbone" or something along those lines. I'm sure you are being true to your experiences but this is just not what I have seen, but we might be from different generations as well. I've heard several women talk about dominant men in a synonymous way to confident men or leaders. Personally, I find it hard to differe…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 09:37 AM
1

This is true. At least as of 2025 research seems to indicate that men do care more than women, but that doesn't mean women don't care. There's a lot of evidence that women actually care a fair bit and it's unfair to throw the baby out with the bath water. After all when women select for men, their preferences matter more.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 01:42 AM
1

A 2014 Pew Research survey found that 78% of unmarried women placed a high premium on finding a spouse with a steady job, compared to only 48% of men who shared this view. (https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2014/09/24/chapter-3-marriage-market-for-all-unmarried-adults/) A study by researchers from the University of Aberdeen found that, when it came to earning capacity, women indicated they preferred a man who earned more than 70% of all other men, while men desired a mate who earned more…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 01:38 AM
0

I think there might be separate definitions of "dominant" I think by "dominant" people do generally mean confident natural leaders, not egotistical insecure people who put others down. Working from that definition I think we can both agree women want dominant men
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 01:23 AM
1

I honestly see a very equal amount of "man vs bear" thing from men as I do from women. I think it's very much dependent on what algorithms you are an audience to. I think exposure to the relevant content is what guides the view that it's more pervasive on the other side — grass is greener and all that.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 01:18 AM
1

Bingo. This is a great working definition and people seem to conflate it with being sexist when it's just a way to define the phenomena concisely, and I think it's apt for said purpose. The same way "emotional labor" is related but different than just "labor". It's a recontextualization that I think is very prominent in society in many different levels. But usually it comes from the ability to provide said benevolence rather than simply the expectation alone. Like women tend to be more emotional…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 01:13 AM
1

Idk man you haven't met the same people I have if you really think that
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 01:01 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter