TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

wrotethistoo Archive

View 0 posts and 72 comments by wrotethistoo on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I dunno what this discussion is even about anymore, it seems like we agree but are just splitting hairs. Porn causes alot of dudes to have ED (as evidenced by ED clearing up in a huge amount of said dudes when they stop watching for a while), so advising dudes to stop is sound advice. "Porn is probably causing your ED, see a doctor though" is the sort of language that should be used instead of more authoritative language. It's not fair to admonish people for giving advice and not putting use com…
/r/TheRedPill08/01/17 12:39 AM
1

If you don't know you have diabetes or chylamidia or hypogonadism or testicular cancer then you haven't been to the doctor (at all?) and you wouldnt be posting on nofap asking why you can't get hard. if you have the clap you should be able to put two and two together and realize it may be affecting your boner. testicular torsion and epydidymitis are also something very obvious and physically painful things that would affect erections and no one who had that happen to them would question why they…
/r/TheRedPill07/01/17 10:50 AM
0

I agree 100% that a person should see a doctor first before coming to any conclusions, but these things you mention are fringe cases and cannot account for the widespread accounts of ED that occur today. The advice should be worded as something like "there is a good chance that pornography is contributing to your ED, unless you have some preexisting medical condition that you are unaware of". But it is not irresponsible to suggest porn may be the cause when so many males have had their ED clear …
/r/TheRedPill06/01/17 07:56 PM
2

You're right to be wary of porn. It fucks up your expectations alot and your dick will compare real sex to porn things and get confused. Lotta dudes have boner problems due to porn. Working out should help your body image/confidence
/r/TheRedPill06/01/17 04:20 PM
0

can you enlighten me on the potential cause of ED in young males ?
/r/TheRedPill06/01/17 07:35 AM
1

your libido will go all over the place while doing no fap, at least in my experience..when i did my 90 days i had "flatline" periods of no sexual excitement at all and thought i was fucked up, then after day 45 or so i had the highest libido ive ever had and started getting attracted to women in whole new ways. and around day 80 or so i felt like something had really shifted in me and my libido stabilized and ive been generally off porn ever since and even mentally regard it as off putting now
/r/TheRedPill05/01/17 06:20 PM
1

not at all. this happens to alot of people. 90 days is arbitrary but it cures almost everyone who has ED and does no fap for a long while. i've been on there for 3 years (have stopped reading recently because ive "gotten over" porn addiction myself) but there are weekly stories there of people reporting the same
/r/TheRedPill05/01/17 06:13 PM
0

there's no reason why a healthy young male should have ED except for some kind of serious psychological trauma/sexual abuse..if there isn't some extreme issue then today's porn is what's doing it. Of course people should see a doctor but where there is smoke there is fire. Widespread ED was not a thing 15 or 20 years ago. Now many many dudes in their 20s have had it happen. The only thing that has changed is high speed porn.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/17 06:08 PM
1

exactly dude. Do Not Binge. Its easy to be like "fuck it, I relapsed already and exacerbate the issue". Your progress is not reset if you relapse after two weeks or whatever. what matters is quantity over time. The goal is Zero, but any progress is progress, and a step towards where you want to be. Don't edge either, it just makes it worse and is worse for you then just just letting one off. When you gotta do it, just let one off without porn. It will be hard but is 1000x better than watching po…
/r/askTRP25/03/16 05:36 PM
2

porn blockers help. K9 is a good one. one trigger can be enough to send you binging, so get ad blockers for utorrent/piratebay. Do not get tricked by the mentality that gifs and images are not porn. The problem is AROUSAL addiction. If you browse imagery to get aroused then you are feeding into the problem. you have to abstain completely and give your pathways time to "shed". This is a POWERFUL addiction. Evolutionarily, there is nothing you are more wired for then the conquest of sexual mates. …
/r/askTRP25/03/16 02:50 PM
1

a person who stated that reasoning for their decision would probably say something like "well..because god wrote it" or whatever. They are giving justifications, even if they are shitty or fall apart under logic. Either way, the moral discourse can begin because they have given a reason for their moral position. As I stated earlier, moral discourse cannot begin until reasons are given. Now we can say AH ok, so you believe that there is a such thing as original sin..well here is why I think that …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 06:42 PM
1

WOW. Yes distinctions require reasons. If someone asks you "why did you do this and not that?" And you said "because reasons", would you expect them to find that an acceptable answer? Again..you are talking OPINIONS and FEELINGS. NOT morals. I am not saying morals are objective. But, YES, morals need reasons for them or they are not morals. Because there is LITERALLY no way of determining which behavior is good or bad without said reasons. Even if that reason is "because it's in the bible" (shit…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 05:11 PM
1

How do you distinguish (or make distinction) between right and wrong without giving reasons (or logic, or rationale..) for why something is wrong and something else is not? No I am not misstating. You just skipped over the important part, which is "distinction" or in your words, "distinguish". You say there is no mention of a reason requirement while mentioning the requirement yourself. Distinction or distinguishment between things requires reasons for that distinction or distinguishment to be m…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 03:22 PM
1

http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/morality You are talking about opinion, not morals. As the definition states, there needs to be a distinction between what is right and wrong behavior, based on principles (or reasons). And that is where moral discourse begins. It's not about objectivity, it's about defending your behavior with reasons. If your reasons fall apart under scrutiny or discourse, then it is up to you to change them. Morals are tied with behavior in the …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/16 04:53 PM
1

because morals are a set of guidelines determining which behavior is right or wrong, and to decide what is right or wrong you need something called reasons
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/16 01:20 PM
1

ice cream preference needs no justification, morality does
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 03:14 PM
3

It drastically affects a lot of stuff. Namely: impulsivity/attention, anxiety, perceived attractiveness of girls, and most importantly erection strength and general arousal cues. Other stuff too. Installing a porn blocker on your computer can help alot (K9 is good). The biggest thing is to try and go zero tolerance. Don't watch gifs or browse gonewild or whatever. It will just slip back into porn. Take a zero tolerance policy on looking at imagery for the purposes of sexual arousal for a good 6 …
/r/askTRP18/02/16 03:14 PM
0

how long have you stopped porn? its not just hi-def porn that is the issue but pmo (porn/masturbation/orgasm)...sadly jerking off to porn for our whole lives wired all this stuff together, so now when you masturbate it still sets off arousal issues and triggers/aggravates erectile dysfunction. you have to abstain from fapping as long and as often as possible until it heals...but it WILL heal
/r/askTRP16/02/16 04:43 PM
2

Like others have said, your problem is likely porn. Young dudes should not have ed issues, period. Our brains are not evolved for today's porno. Your arousal centers are fried. Nofap/pornfree until your issues go away. Happens to tons of dudes, but the issues always clear up after doing nofap/pornfree for a while.
/r/askTRP10/02/16 06:05 PM
2

Ah oops! I misread. I think I'm just used to (unwarranted) anti-nofap/pornfree sentiments on here. I would suggest to you to stick it out as long as possible. Shit gets in there DEEP. You get benefits after only a few weeks but it takes several months to see really big changes and to see firsthand just how much porn affects your emotional landscape/perception of females/stress management skills/energy levels/libido etc etc.
/r/askTRP05/02/16 05:59 PM
1

The benefits of nofap are from abstaining from porn, not abstaining from masturbation. The nofap part is necessary to decouple the wiring of the the porn-aroused parts of the brain from the masturbation and orgasm parts. Masturbating to high speed porno from a young age (which our brains did not evolve for) has caused these to become mashed together. Nofap allows the brain to reset to it's natural settings (and more natural and less anxious traversal of the real life sexual universe....because t…
/r/askTRP05/02/16 02:57 PM
1

The main concern is the conflation of the term "masturbation" with "masturbation to high speed pornography". Such is the danger of labels. Porn is the problem. Our brains did not evolve to handle it. Our brains think we are there when we are watching, and our arousal systems get nuked. Porn is the problem, not masturbation. Unfortunately we have all been plugged in since an early age and alotta damage was done. Unplugging is the only way to heal and get back to healthy masturbatory habits, in my…
/r/askTRP05/02/16 02:52 PM
1

Wrong. The effects of hi-def pornography on the brain are very real and every new study that is done lends evidence to this claim. Getting rid of that tied with the reappropriation of sexual energy does very real things, not only to the attention of females and others but in motivation, energy, etc. Not placebo at all, in my experience
/r/askTRP05/02/16 02:49 PM
1

2 weeks is nothing. The problem is the conflation of masturbation with masturbation to hi-def pornography. These things are not equal and it's insane to lump them together. Masturbation is healthy, jerking off to high-speed porn is not because our brains cannot turn off arousal and it sets our entire sexual systems out of whack. Evolution did not account for incredibly lifelike virtual environments, and is our brains are getting fried by the gap in information processing. Unplugging for a long t…
/r/askTRP05/02/16 02:45 PM
1

I'm happy to help, yes it seems very likely. I will offer a warning that quitting is incredibly difficult...but once you see how difficult it is you will also realize how much your brain craves it. It will work you over emotionally because your brain is literally changing during the process and you are depriving it of something it is very used to, as well as something which you have probably been using for stress relief/emotional management (as all of us have done)..so when that is gone it can b…
/r/askTRP02/02/16 11:02 PM
1

KIt's impossible to know without abstaining and seeing what the difference is. I'm of the opinion that ED at a young age is almost exclusively due to porn. Before porn only 1 to 3 percent of young males ever reported ED issues. After porn it's up to 30 or 40 percent. Where there's smoke there's fire. Being stoned while doing it likely increases the dopamine flood alot and exacerbates the process. The admission that it gets you hornier than life is a red flag as well. Across the board dudes who h…
/r/askTRP02/02/16 06:01 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EHHyt6z0osA Here's some info on porn induced erectile dysfunction. See if it strikes a nerve.
/r/askTRP02/02/16 01:17 PM
2

Porn gives a lot of dudes problems with premature ejaculation and ED. There is no reason you should be having ED if you are young, unless youve had some kind of sex related trauma or severe psychological/ptsd stress stuff going on. It's PORN. Seriously this is probably the problem. It happens all the time. Dudes have ED. They stop watching porn/masturbating to porn. 3-6 months later all ED issues evaporate. Every day a new guy realizes how bad porn was fucking his brain up. I've seen it happen t…
/r/askTRP02/02/16 01:10 PM
1

Usually the first 10 days are the hardest after a relapse, but if you work through it then the urges sharply decline after that. and the urges will become less and less as you resist further and further. At least in my experience. You have to remember that progress should be looked at as a total input/output sort of deal. Dopamine surge is a good way to tell that you are still craving it. It takes a longgggg time for that to go away. Shit gets embedded deep.
/r/askTRP01/02/16 06:10 PM
1

It's hell..but using it as a goal can be extremely motivating once you realize how much determination it takes. Try going 30 days without porn at all and see what happens. when you notice how much you crave it you will realize the addiction for what it is. it has changed the lives of countless people and completely blow apart their denial of how addicted they were...i am one of those people. it;s the cigarette of our generation in my opinion, meaning that its something incredibly harmful that we…
/r/askTRP01/02/16 10:15 AM
1

Try nofap/no porn. It can work wonders. Porn can make you really needy and anxious..because porn is often used to quench neediness (any need fulfilled at a click) and anxiousness (dopamine flood). This spreads to real life women, because your brain really can't tell the difference. Porn helps create a whole dependence/approval thing that is deep rooted and destructive. Also built up sexual energy in and of itself will naturally go towards women instead of a tissue. Try unplugging and seeing if t…
/r/askTRP01/02/16 09:21 AM
0

What you experienced here when you felt no sexual attractions to women was a "flatline" and it is a GOOD thing. This was your brain rewiring itself and shedding porn pathways. It happens to everyone who does nofap. After a week or so or maybe two weeks your libido will come back. As someone stated, high definition instant accesss unlimited novelty pornography is the problem here, not masturbation. The problem is that since guys have abused porn from a young age, they now associate masturbation/p…
/r/askTRP01/02/16 08:36 AM
2

The most important thing to consider is that masturbation does not equal masturbation to high speed high def internet videos. The problem is so severe now that masturbation is not even thought of outside of watching porn when the word masturbation is discussed. They have become one and the same. People like whisper and others honestly just have no fucking idea what they are talking about. You can't know how much porn fucks with you until you unplug. The fact that the logic behind nofap and trp b…
/r/askTRP27/01/16 03:03 PM
2

UYeah I wish there was some sort of less extreme trp subreddit so we can separate the good ideas from the bad. Purplepilldebate is too toxic because everyone is just defensive. In general I think the "naturalistic fallacy" needs to be kept in the forefront of the mind when considering all trp "truths" and is a good guideline to beginning parsing the misogyny from the healthy/logical. (Naturalistic fallacy being that because it is natural or an evolved mechanism then it is good for humans)
/r/askTRP15/01/16 02:34 PM
4

I agree. Not all aspects of buddhism are compatible, and hurting others on purpose is certainly not. Compassion for others, however, is. And I think there is an argument that understanding some things about a person's nature can help in compassion and closeness towards them. There's a fine line. There is no one way to be an "alpha". You don't have to adopt the more manipulative and abusive aspects of trp (i reject these myself). Going your own way and not letting others control you or influence …
/r/askTRP15/01/16 01:59 PM
5

I think buddhism and trp can coexist. Buddhism is all about not giving a Fuck and being self sufficient. Not getting caught up in thoughts and just living in the moment. Not getting attached. Not getting caught up in either desire or fear. Not letting past events affect present situations. Not projecting into the future. Focusing on the senses. Embodying this sort of aware, awake and noncontingent inner world is naturally attractive and comforting. It exudes confidence and strength.
/r/askTRP15/01/16 01:31 PM
3

If you've never considered it before, pornography may contribute to your anxiety. I had issues at one point too, but my anxiety decreased to almost nothing after I stopped watching
/r/askTRP14/01/16 02:28 AM
1

Convicably is not a word
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 06:35 PM
1

soooo youre just gonna keep saying the same thing over and over again instead of make any salient or logical retort to what i'm saying. i forgot you were a dum dum for a second. can't waste my time here anymore. hope you learned something.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 06:25 PM
1

It's a principle guiding behavior. If he said "because I think it's better" it's an opinion. If he says "because I was given an order" it's a moral argument, giving DISTINCTION that "following orders is better than not following them (because I took a vow to follow orders). It's not moral or immoral, but it's a moral argument, which you have not done. Once more: Moral arguments need outward justification. By definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 06:11 PM
1

see ya, dum dum (oh yeah and an order is an outward justification)
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 05:43 PM
1

IF YOU ASKED THE SOLDIER WHAT MORAL GROUNDS HE HAD FOR WHAT HE DID HE WOULD HAVE TO GIVE YOU SOME SORT OF REASON WHY HE DID IT. IF HE SAID "BECAUSE I FELT IT WAS RIGHT" THEN YOU WOULD SAY "YOU ARE DUMB YOU ARE NOT ANSWERING THE QUESTION". Which is what I am saying to you. Here is what morality is: morality məˈralɪti noun: principles concerning the distinction between right and wrong or good and bad behaviour. NOTICE THE WORD DISTINCTION AND BEHAVIOUR. DISTINCTIONS ARE MADE BY THINGS CALLED REASO…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 05:23 PM
1

I've come to the conclusion that you just don't understand words
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 03:55 PM
1

Morals are not strictly opinions. They are principles that guide behavior. Without speaking of the principles guiding the behavior you are not speaking about morality. Morality and opinions are different things, by fucking definition. Thats why we have different words for them. It's easy to tell you lack critical thinking skills. Morals DO need outward justification. By DEFINTION. Fucking google it. Or read an ethics book. Holy shit you are dumb.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 03:52 PM
1

Annnnnnnnndd fin. Your circle of irrelevant non-argument to the topic at hand is complete. (Also just because I want some actual learning to go on here, look up "appeal to fear" if you want to understand why this statement is a shitty argument to try and give here, even if it was relevant to morality whatsoever..which it isn't).
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 09:02 PM
1

Opinions should be formed on logic and reason. And morals must be discussed in terms of the principles behind the action. Not all opinions are justified. This is why discourse exists. To separate good opinions and moral stances from bad ones. If you want to think whatever you want you surely can. It doesn't mean your opinion is a good one or justified in any way.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 08:55 AM
1

Dude. You're seriously unimaginably dense. Not saying morals are set in stone. I'm saying morals must be spoken of in terms of action as derived by principles. Because this is what morality IS, by definition. To not speak of principles behind action is to speak about something else entirely. All these things you mention have PRINCIPLES which guide their ACTION. Which they would tell you if you ask. They wouldn't just say "because I think so!!!!!!!" If they did so, then that would be their OPINIO…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 08:50 AM
1

Shop being condescending. Morality is not strictly opinion, by defintion. Your beliefs are based on false premises. Morality without discussion of action is not discussion of morality. You're seriously a fucking moron if you don't understand this basic concept.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 11:09 PM
1

morality - /məˈralɪti/ noun principles concerning the distinction between right and wrong or good and bad behaviour. (Key word here is behavior in case you need help with that). opinion - /əˈpɪnjən/ noun a view or judgement formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge. A clue. Get one before arguing.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 12:05 PM
1

Morals are the disjunction between what is right and what is wrong. Thought vs. Action. Morals are principles. Principles based in logic and reasoning. Opinions are beliefs, views and attitudes and do not enter into the realm of action. If you enter into the realm action you must justify it morally. Morals. Are. Not. Opinions.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 11:32 AM
1

The act of having sex is the circumstance. A single girl and a single guy agree to sex. They do. They part ways. She then agrees to have sex with another single guy. They do. They part ways. And another. They part ways. Where does the shame come in, and why is it morally justifiable?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 10:54 AM
1

Your statements about risk still have NOTHING to do with morality. Where does morality fit in here? To begin talking about morality there has to be baselines. "People should be free to do things as long as it does not oppress the freedom of others" is as basic as it gets. Without any baseline then talking about morality at all is pointless. You can invoke god, or spaghetti monster, or say that people are just animals and that nature is always good (naturalistic fallacy). Moral discourse is like …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 10:39 AM
1

I'm defending my points with reason and logic (people should be free to perform actions that do not directly hurt or oppress others...not exactly a radical statement on what baseline morality should be). This extremely basic and fundamental statement on morality is all that is needed to defend against slut shaming (which is quite obviously immoral). The ENTIRE purpose of discussing morality is to figure out what is right and wrong. Any position in a morality discussion (or any discussion) needs …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 10:21 AM
1

Opinions need justification. This is called reason. And it's a very good thing for human beings. The purpose of discourse is to make others change where they draw their lines, if the argument is persuasive and reasonable enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 10:12 AM
1

TYou are just being a coward and declining to take a stance. The purpose of discourse and debate is to take a stance. This debate is about the morality of slut shaming. Morals are only opinions to those who have not developed a stance as to what morality is. You obviously haven't thought about it very much if you think that it is purely opinion. The point of discourse is to make logical reasonable arguments and defend them. If you want to say "all arguments are equally valid because opinions!!!!…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 10:07 AM
1

This entire discussion is about whether slut shaming is morally justifiable. The purpose of discourse is to challenge others opinions. Also, it seems you are justifying immorality with your first sentence. Which implies that you may agree that slut shaming is immoral but agree with it anyway because immorality has given us civilization..?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 09:56 AM
1

So you are saying that girls being slut shamed don't deserve it, then? You answered a question about the morality of slut shaming by stating that they know the consequences of their actions. This implies that you are responding to the question posed, and that because the consequences are bad then they should correct their behavior. If you are just making a general statement then good for you, but why would you say it response to this thread? You are backtracking. If you are suggesting that what …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 09:43 AM
1

The question is about what is moral. You are intending to harm without justification (as stated, the act of two people having sexual intercourse does not directly affect anyone else in any way whatsoever). Intent to harm without justification is immoral and unethical. If a person has enough strength to let this unethical or immoral intent to harm not actually harm them, then good for them. The intent is still unethical/immoral.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 09:19 AM
1

The question is about morals. You are not morally justified in your opinion, or your expression of it. Whether someone lets something hurt them is besides the point, the intent to harm is the immoral act being done.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 09:15 AM
1

The question is about what is moral. You were suggesting previously that because the consequences of their actions (having sex) are negative (being slut shamed), that their actions deserve their treatment. You are taking the position that the norm is always morally correct. This is an awful, illogical argument because it could be applied to any number of situations. You are shifting the argument beyond the moral question posed.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 09:01 AM
1

Yeah, I know. This is a discussion. Should I preface everything by saying "in my view....?" We are talking about morality as a concept. To do so we have to define what morality means, or else it just becomes pointless. A guideline of morality such as "something is morally ok as long is it does not hurt others without justification" is a basic place to start..in my view.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 05:25 PM
0

Your disagreements are not based in reason. Not all arguments are valid. Your arguments are invalid. Believe what you will, this will not change.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 03:27 PM
0

God has NOTHING to do with morality. You can't "disagree" with that. No wonder this argument is going nowhere. Every argument you have given is literally "I can do what I want anyway". You are acting immorally. Grapple with it or don't, but it doesn't absolve you. Not arguing with you anymore if your answers are "cuz god".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 03:09 PM
-3

Being racist doesn't hurt anyone as long as you don't express it in any way, ever. If you do, you are being immoral. You can think girls are shitty people for making their own sexual choices all you want (ludicrous as it is), but if you express that and hurt them then you are being immoral. The person I was responding to said the person was being shamed for being racist, which implies they expressed their racist attitude in some way.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 02:58 PM
0

Invoking god is basically saying "I don't want to argue" It is not carte blanche to act as you please. Morality is based on what is good and best for every person, not the individual. Power is relative, morality is not. Your last sentence is just flat out strange and I don't know how to respond to it. Basically what you are saying is that morality doesn't even exist. But you are in this thread, so obviously you believe that it does...?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 02:53 PM
0

Shame always causes harm, and that doesn't even matter. Because something causes harm does not make it bad or good. What makes something bad or good is the justification for the act based on the limitation the act or expression in question had on one's own freedom. There is no justification for shaming a girl who has sex with a guy because a girl who has sex with a guy is not hurting or involving anyone else WHATSOEVER in any direct way. So to shame them is immoral, because it causes hurt where …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 02:45 PM
-1

Yep, you have a right to act however you wish. That does not mean it is morally justifiable, which is the question posed. (spoiler: it isn't)
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 02:41 PM
-2

Calling people niggers doesn't hurt them. Yep. If everyone called black people niggers and didn't impose on them physically there would be no adverse effects at all to the people being called niggers. You also do not grapple with the larger point of the act of sex (IN AND OF ITSELF) does not hurt anyone else. You can apply any number of doom scenarios like a fucking Geico commercial. This is just shifting the argument. Learn logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 02:32 PM
1

You are skirting the greater point of "Why should this be shamed in the first place?" People's main function is fucking. We literally exist for the purposes of "passing on" our genes. And if you want to go to the higher moral realm, this act (IN AND OF ITSELF...not talking about cheating or whatever) is a decision between two people that does not directly impose or limit anyone else in any direct way. Why the fuck would this be shameful? It is not a justifiable basis for shaming someone if their…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 02:22 PM
2

Awful argument. You could easily apply this to any number of situations. With this logic, no one should ever go against the norm for fear of being shamed.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 02:16 PM
-2

Nobody is hurt if you're a racist?? How about the people you are racist against.....? If two people have sex it does not directly impose or limit anyone else's freedom to act as they please. As long as you do not hurt or limit anyone else by the acts that you do, you should be free to do them. This is basic morality.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 02:12 PM
2

The problem is not masturbation. The problem is the Masturbation/High definition pornography/Orgasm complex. No one grows up masturbating by itself anymore. People only masturbate to high def porn. It's so intertwined that these have become synonymous conceptually (masturbate/masturbate to hd porn) when in practice (and to your brain) they are COMPLETELY different things.
/r/TheRedPill02/01/16 08:36 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter