~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | I did a study | Discrimination | wrstlr3232 | /r/MensRights | 13/09/22 06:07 PM |
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | White men are actively discriminated against in the job market right nowThen prove me wrong. It’s a simple request. | /r/MensRights | 14/10/23 08:05 PM |
| 2 | White men are actively discriminated against in the job market right nowClearly you don't understand how the internet works. There is no burden on me whatsoever. Yeah, it’s an echo chamber to not get your feelings hurt. You can just lie to yourself and others will agree with you The unemployment rates? You provided a source that proves me right. White men are so resourceful and productive that hardly any are unemployed despite blatant discrimination against them in corporate HR/recruiting departments as well as "affirmative action" (aka Government Sanctioned Anti-Wh… | /r/MensRights | 14/10/23 07:45 PM |
| -1 | White men are actively discriminated against in the job market right nowI don't have to prove anything. Do you not understand how an argument works? The burden of proof falls on you It's free information. Then provide the information. I commented a link to prove you wrong. Was a single one of them appointed because he's a white male? Was a single one appointed because they were the best candidate This is not the point here. All 500 members of congress could be clone Eskimo dwarfs as long as they were the best candidates picked on merit. How do you know white males w… | /r/MensRights | 14/10/23 06:50 PM |
| -4 | White men are actively discriminated against in the job market right nowWhen clearly inferior candidates get jobs instead of you, it is discrimination. Prove they were inferior candidates. Things have gone so far that corporations pretty much openly say that they will hire anyone except white men. Provide a source for this. White men have the lowest unemployment of any group. Sorry, you’re wrong https://www.dol.gov/agencies/wb/data/latest-annual-data/employment-rates For high profile examples outside of the corporate world, look at Biden and Newsom appointees for th… | /r/MensRights | 14/10/23 05:59 PM |
| 1 | White men are actively discriminated against in the job market right nowI can tell you don't work in tech and are also completely out of touch with the corporate world right now. I work in tech at a large corporate company. As a white male. Maybe you’re completely out of touch with the corporate world. Ever think you’re the issue? Yes let's hire an underqualified black woman for a different perspective on things. Maybe she can cook up some soul food for the office and line up a gospel event for us while we miss deadlines? Jesus Christ that’s so racist lol. No wonder… | /r/MensRights | 14/10/23 05:46 PM |
| -24 | White men are actively discriminated against in the job market right nowJust because you’re not getting jobs doesn’t mean you’re being discriminated against. Especially being white. The research shows being white is an advantage https://www.nber.org/digest/sep03/employers-replies-racial-names But, only hiring white males is not good. Diversification is good to have. Hiring a black women that may not have as good of a resume means you have a different perspective on things. You don’t have an echo chamber of ideas (kind of like in this sub). You even said you are rece… | /r/MensRights | 14/10/23 04:56 PM |
| 1 | Why does the media portray men to be idiots?The argument was NEVER that there are never ANY dumb females. Then why bring it up at all? If both men and women are portrayed as idiots, then why even bring it up? That’s just complaining about something that doesn’t matter. Like complaining there’s a professional women’s basketball league or that men have cancer. Male or female doesn’t matter when creating a character that’s an idiot. You’re finding something to whine about. The argument is this. There is a greater prevalence of stupid men por… | /r/MensRights | 23/09/23 06:37 PM |
| 0 | Why does the media portray men to be idiots?If there are dumb female characters, the argument that there are dumb male characters is pointless. If it happens to both males and females, you can’t ONLY be upset that it happens to one side The N+1 is a horrible argument because there are more male actors, especially in lead roles. That means more men are hired than women. That’s an advantage for men. Take shows with women leads. Off the top of my head, 2 broke girls, dumb girl. Broad city, two dumb girls. Mom, two dumb girls. Parks and rec, … | /r/MensRights | 23/09/23 01:05 PM |
| 1 | Why does the media portray men to be idiots?Your argument was already lost decades ago. Lost to reality. I gave plenty of examples proving my point N dumb girls are only allowed if there N+1 dumb males, and only if the girls demonstrate that they are inherently clever in other ways. 1) so there are dumb females as well. Defeats the argument. 2) shows almost always have more male roles than female so the N+1 makes sense since there are more males. French Prince was will and Carlton, the office was Michael, Jim, and Dwight to Pam. Friends h… | /r/MensRights | 23/09/23 02:35 AM |
| 1 | Why does the media portray men to be idiots?And you don’t think that happens with male characters? Michael Scott made possibly the biggest sale of the show (chili’s episode) Kevin had multiple episodes in the office where he showed he was really smart Joey was the first one to figure out Chandler and Monica were dating These are just off the top of my head. Yeah his is a losing argument for you (and the others). Comedy has dumb girls and dumb guys. They have endearing qualities though. That’s the way comedy works. | /r/MensRights | 22/09/23 01:32 AM |
| 2 | Why does the media portray men to be idiots?Come on now. You can find non idiot men and idiot women in plenty of the examples. Just the shows I’ve seen: Fresh Prince - Will wasn’t an idiot, the dad wasn’t. Hillary, the sister, was. Friends - Ross was a nerd, not an idiot(he had a doctorate), chandler was not. Rachel and Phoebe were. Seinfeld - Jerry wasn’t. If George was, so was Elaine Full House - Jesse wasn’t, the dad wasn’t, Kimmy was The office - Jim, Stanley, Oscar, Roy, Daryl were not. New girl - if the three guys were, so was Jess.… | /r/MensRights | 21/09/23 10:42 PM |
| 1 | The reaction to Russell Brand by feminist controlled media is a familiar storyI'm just saying mainstream media is predominated with the narratives conducive to Feminism and Feminists Then you should be able to provide article after article to prove your point. But you (and everyone else) has yet to do that. Just because you think something, doesn’t mean you’re correct. Not providing evidence is a great way to not be challenged on your views. The burden of proof lies on you. | /r/MensRights | 21/09/23 07:11 PM |
| 0 | The reaction to Russell Brand by feminist controlled media is a familiar storyWhat evidence do you have? Fox News isn’t feminist and they’re one of the most watched news channels. I showed you CNN donates to the Republicans just as much as the Democrats. You’ve provided no evidence. Only “you’re dumb”. But I’m the one showing you’re the one that’s dumb. That’s the problem with this sub, no evidence, only what they believe. 22 downvotes and not a single person has been able to go, look this proves they’re feminist. Everyone downvotes, no one provides evidence. You know wha… | /r/MensRights | 21/09/23 06:23 PM |
| -1 | The reaction to Russell Brand by feminist controlled media is a familiar storyLol yeah, nearly half of their donations go to the anti-feminist party. Do you not understand numbers? They “liberal, feminist” network sending half their donations to republicans is a pretty glaring example that they’re not as liberal or feminist as you (and everyone else in there) make them out to be. | /r/MensRights | 20/09/23 11:15 PM |
| -4 | The reaction to Russell Brand by feminist controlled media is a familiar storyMoney is what matters. If they lose advertising, they lose money. Like my other comment, CNN donated nearly 45% of their total donations to Republican candidates. Why would a “feminist” company give half their donations to the political party that is anti-feminism? I’ll help you out, because they’re not really feminist | /r/MensRights | 20/09/23 10:54 PM |
| -12 | The reaction to Russell Brand by feminist controlled media is a familiar storyhttps://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/police-probe-russell-brand-sex-assault-allegations-red-flags-emerge-comedians-past Fox sure isn’t left wing. https://www.opensecrets.org/political-action-committees-pacs/warnermedia-group/C00339291/candidate-recipients/2018 Warner media, who owns CNN, donated 44.5% to Republicans. CNN is supposed to be left wing. Everyone claims the media is left winged, but if you look underneath everything, they’re moderate. Regardless, these are white men. They do what th… | /r/MensRights | 20/09/23 05:02 PM |
| -22 | The reaction to Russell Brand by feminist controlled media is a familiar storyFeminist controlled media? Are you insane? The media is overwhelmingly controlled by wealthy, old white guys. White MEN. If you’re blaming the media, you’re blaming the men controlling the media. The hoops you jump through to get to your conclusions to blame it on anyone but men is bafflingly. https://projects.iq.harvard.edu/futureofmedia/index-us-mainstream-media-ownership | /r/MensRights | 20/09/23 04:21 PM |
| 2 | Why do female teachers always seem to target boys in sexual abuse cases?I have no idea. You seem to be asking a lot of questions without looking for answers. There’s probably data out there, go look for the answer. The answer is usually the most obvious. In this case, most people are straight, so they target the opposite sex. If you look at the numbers and see that both male teachers and female teachers sexually assault boys more, then there are some questions. I doubt that’s the case though | /r/MensRights | 15/09/23 03:53 AM |
| 11 | Why do female teachers always seem to target boys in sexual abuse cases?Because most people are straight. I assume most male teachers target girls as well. I’m sure if you look at the data, the number of girls sexually assaulted by male teachers is very close to the number of boys sexually assaulted by female teachers. | /r/MensRights | 15/09/23 03:02 AM |
| 1 | Lyft supports discrimination against men in ridesharinghttps://helpingsurvivors.org/rideshare-sexual-assault/statistics/#:~:text=After%20a%202018%20CNN%20report,of%20which%20were%20in%202018. Thousands of sexual assault reports between Uber and Lyft. They don’t breakdown gender but women are sexually assaulted at higher rates than men, I think we can assume women are the victims more often. Sure, allow men to ask for men drivers. Safety is important. Let’s not forget that Uber (I understand this is Lyft) was caught in a sexual assault scandal a few … | /r/MensRights | 13/09/23 09:28 PM |
| 0 | How do you protect yourself against being accused of sexual assault.We ALL know someone who has been falsely accused Do we? I don’t. If you think 30% of women are being sexually assaulted on campus you’re a complete moron. You seem to not understand statistics. Of the women who were sexually assaulted, 30% of them don’t even report the sexual assault. Reasons have been because they don’t think anything will happen, they’re scared of consequences, people will treat them horribly, among other things. | /r/MensRights | 11/09/23 05:49 PM |
| -11 | How do you protect yourself against being accused of sexual assault.How often? 90% of college men being falsely accused? Or 0.00001%? The numbers show that women are actually raped and are too scared to report account for something like 30% of the time. False accusations is something like 5% of the time. In fact, you have a higher chance of being sexually assaulted yourself (25%) than being falsely accused of sexual assault(2-10%). But you’re worried about being falsely accused. Stop being scared of the wrong things. You’re being tricked. https://www.nsvrc.org/s… | /r/MensRights | 10/09/23 10:27 PM |
| -11 | How do you protect yourself against being accused of sexual assault.Yes, I read the news every day. What exactly are you referring to? The news does an amazing job of taking something incredibly irrelevant and blowing it out of proportion | /r/MensRights | 10/09/23 09:32 PM |
| -13 | How do you protect yourself against being accused of sexual assault.Jesus, what are you guys doing that you’re actually worried about this? False accusations rarely happen. The answer: don’t do anything questionable. Treat women with respect and don’t give them a reason to accuse you. There are some crazy women (and men out there). Stay away from them. Non crazy women (and men) don’t just accuse people of things they didn’t do Ask yourself how many males you know and how many of them have been falsely accused of sexual assault. I guarantee it is 0% or near 0%. | /r/MensRights | 10/09/23 09:25 PM |
| -3 | Why do married women cheat so much more?Compared to what? Single women? If you’re comparing men and women, there’s no evidence that one gender cheats more than the other. https://ifstudies.org/blog/who-cheats-more-the-demographics-of-cheating-in-america https://www.choosingtherapy.com/who-cheats-more-men-or-women/ https://discreetinvestigations.ca/infidelity-statistics-who-cheats-more-men-or-women/#:~:text=According%20to%20the%20General%20Social,gender%20gap%20varies%20per%20age. | /r/MensRights | 25/08/23 12:38 PM |
| -1 | Dont play video games.While this is a ridiculous article, this isn’t anything new. The right has been saying this for years. Don’t post one article by a feminist when you ignore the hundreds/thousands of articles by non feminists | /r/MensRights | 11/08/23 03:15 PM |
| 2 | A "legal" paternity test costs twice as much as a regular, at-home paternity test. It's the same thing but somehow twice the price.In the US? That’s how everything is. Tylenol, syringes, insulin. Anything that can be marked up, is. That’s capitalism. Simple economics | /r/MensRights | 05/08/23 06:34 PM |
| 1 | Emmett Till's false accuser is finally dead.No actually you said white guys didnt go through this and then inorovved you wrong and then you raised the bar to say black women had it worse even though I said nothing about them. Where? Give me a link to where I said any of this. Thats running on unproved assumptions, so imma disregard them. And you ignored the rest of my paragraph about white men raping black women. Convenient. What are your thoughts on that? Women being oppressed at this time was not an assumption. You picked out the one se… | /r/MensRights | 29/04/23 09:21 PM |
| 1 | Emmett Till's false accuser is finally dead.Mindlessly parroting lines? You’re not very smart are you? That entire paragraph what’s my own writing based on historical books about the reconstruction and Jim Crow south. I took facts and used my logic to create my own paragraph on the subject. Your black on black crime is parroting because, if you use facts and logic, it’s easy to see that it’s a simple tactic to change the subject. It’s a simple logical fallacy. What do you mean whites are the minority? When have whites ever been the minori… | /r/MensRights | 29/04/23 03:52 PM |
| 1 | Emmett Till's false accuser is finally dead.Provide evidence that black women were lynched more than white guys. The burden of proof is on you. No, no, no. The burden of proof falls on YOU. You claimed > but they weren’t lynched at the same rate as white guys https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1314nyl/emmett_tills_false_accuser_is_finally_dead/ji5skac/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=ioscss&utm_content=1&utm_term=1&context=3 And if emmet till were a black woman, no murders would have occurred either. Can you prove t… | /r/MensRights | 29/04/23 03:42 PM |
| 1 | Emmett Till's false accuser is finally dead.Man, for someone who is all about facts and logic, you sure don’t know much about the subject. There are books written about this. I suggest reading them. I’m not going to spend my day giving you a history lesson. The quick and simple is, black men were viewed as threats to white women. They were viewed as criminals who wanted to go around and rape white women. And white women needed to be protected from black men. The woman was the victim in interracial relationships and they were being protect… | /r/MensRights | 29/04/23 03:04 PM |
| 1 | Emmett Till's false accuser is finally dead.They were lynched for dating BLACK women. They were lynched for helping BLACK people. That’s a race issue. | /r/MensRights | 29/04/23 01:49 PM |
| 1 | Emmett Till's false accuser is finally dead.If white guys are lynched more than black chicks then your statement is untrue. Provide the evidence this is true. 2. The reason people were lynched is because of race. Just like people were executed for helping Jews during WWII. The factor causing executions was helping Jewish people, nothing else. Black women were raped by white men and they couldn’t do anything about it. Why aren’t you bringing up that point? Let’s talk about that and see how biased your argument is. Are you going to have a “… | /r/MensRights | 29/04/23 01:48 PM |
| 1 | Emmett Till's false accuser is finally dead.Actually multiple white dudes have been lynched for dating black women or defending black folk in general. So then you agree, it’s a race issue. | /r/MensRights | 29/04/23 06:57 AM |
| 1 | Emmett Till's false accuser is finally dead.Ahh yes that must be why there were just as many black women who were lynched as men except - OH WAIT thats actually not true at all because its was actually disproportionately black male victims. Which means guess what. Its both a black AND a man issue. This is a simple straw man. Changing the argument to avoid debating it. If he was white, this wouldn’t have happened. That makes it a race issue. Black women were still oppressed. Rosa Parks is an easy example. Okay so whats your opinion towards… | /r/MensRights | 29/04/23 06:55 AM |
| -28 | Emmett Till's false accuser is finally dead.I mean, he was killed because he was black, not because he was a male. It’s pretty straight forward. Regardless, the people that killed him, were men. You can’t cheer this on as a men’s rights issue if men are doing the killing. | /r/MensRights | 28/04/23 03:17 AM |
| 3 | NBC reports “gunMAN” instead of gunperson after school shooting of preschoolers was done by a female shooter. NBC thinks it’s okay to assume gender when it comes to males and shootings.Gunman, fireman, mailman. These are generic terms that all refer to female and male. These kinds of things are what make men’s rights look bad. This doesn’t matter | /r/MensRights | 28/03/23 01:03 AM |
| 1 | She is going to be a heart surgeonI’m using Brock turner because this is an issue about status, not sex. Wealthy/higher status people receive less severe penalties. It’s very simple. In the original example and Brock turner’s case, they were given less punishment because it would negatively affect their futures. The judges said that. This doesn’t take much effort to see this is a status issue for this woman’s case | /r/MensRights | 24/02/23 07:16 PM |
| 1 | She is going to be a heart surgeon…I literally said, “are men treated worse than women in the Justice system? Yes.” You fucking quoted me on it!!! I’ve agreed there is female privilege. But this case it wealth/status/class, not sex Your link is a paywall, I can’t read it. | /r/MensRights | 24/02/23 01:38 PM |
| 0 | She is going to be a heart surgeonThe original argument is, she got out of it because she’s a woman. Clearly not the case since the judge said it was because it would hurt her future, which is almost exactly what the judge said in the Turner case. Pretty cut and dry. This sub lacks critical thinking skills. | /r/MensRights | 24/02/23 01:33 PM |
| -1 | She is going to be a heart surgeonlol you literal contracted yourself in 2 sentences. You think those two sentences contradicted each other? If so, this conversation is over. You’re so brainwashed you can’t understand that yes, men are treated differently, but this lady got off because she’s a mess school student, not because she’s a women. If you want further proof, read what the judge said. A harsh punishment would ruin her career. That’s nearly identical to what the judge in Turner’s case said. Again, wealthy people always ge… | /r/MensRights | 24/02/23 04:07 AM |
| 1 | She is going to be a heart surgeonMight? No the most important factor was her being a mess school student. That’s why the judge said because she was clever and it would hurt her career. He didn’t say, because she’s a woman. | /r/MensRights | 24/02/23 03:37 AM |
| -1 | She is going to be a heart surgeonThis woman dropped out of med school and will never get a job in a hospital. Same consequences. The judge being removed, more laws being passed, it doesn’t have anything to do with the actual case or punishment. That’s beyond the argument. This is an issue of privilege. If she wasn’t a med student, she would have had a harsher punishment, just like Turner. | /r/MensRights | 24/02/23 03:03 AM |
| -5 | She is going to be a heart surgeonYes he served 3 months of his 6 months sentence, so 50% and infinitely more than this girl. Maybe we have different views, but I think raping someone who is unconscious should come with much more than 6 months in prison. It seems like you think 3 months is too much. Her sentence was never overturned. She was given "10 months in prison suspended for 18 months.", which means if she is a good girl for 2.5 years, she won't be imprisoned. Soooo, somewhat similar to 6 months and half of someone is a g… | /r/MensRights | 24/02/23 02:58 AM |
| -3 | She is going to be a heart surgeonHe had a 6 month sentence for rape. Are you really going to argue that? For rape, 6 months? Come on. And she originally got 10 months https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/lavinia-woodward-stab-boyfriend-no-jail-prison-sentence-oxford-medical-student-too-clever-talent-judge-a7967971.html?amp | /r/MensRights | 24/02/23 12:36 AM |
| -8 | She is going to be a heart surgeonBrock Turner served 50% of his term… Which was 6 months. He did 3 months for raping a drunk girl. Is this really part of your argument? https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/lavinia-woodward-stab-boyfriend-no-jail-prison-sentence-oxford-medical-student-too-clever-talent-judge-a7967971.html?amp And, just so we’re clear, she did get a prison sentence, it was overturned though. The prison sentence was 10 months. 4 months more than Brock turner and Turner raped a female, this lady stabbed a date in t… | /r/MensRights | 24/02/23 12:28 AM |
| -17 | She is going to be a heart surgeonhttps://www.nbcsports.com/bayarea/ncaa/ex-stanford-swimmer-rapist-released-after-serving-half-his-term I mean, privilege is always going to help you. No matter the sex Edit: also the quote from the judge in Turner’s case is very similar to this one Persky was already under fire for saying that a longer prison sentence "would have a severe impact" on Turner. And, she originally got 10 months. More than Turner | /r/MensRights | 23/02/23 10:49 PM |
| 1 | 55% of White Women voted for Trump - What feminists don't want to speak about(I only read the first paragraph, so someone can comment with a quote if I’m wrong) This is a statistically inaccurate way of looking at the data. If 45% of white women were feminists, and none of them voted for Trump, this post is completely wrong. You’re using 55% and assuming that 100% of white women are feminists. That’s just not true. 100% are female, but that doesn’t mean they’re all feminists. There are plenty of women who voted for trump and are not feminists. And there are plenty of wom… | /r/MensRights | 14/02/23 03:32 PM |
| 0 | Apparently age of consent changes depending on who's benefiting.I’m not sure if the top one is true. The first comparison I think of is strippers. I’ve yet to meet any women (or men) who have a positive view of strippers, including being empowered. Most people view men that constantly go to strip clubs as perverted. Especially the older ones. Provide me some strong evidence and that people view OF as empowering or this is just a straight neckbeard take. | /r/MensRights | 11/02/23 05:47 PM |
| 0 | Why do women always have to “marry up?” In college most of my class was girls putting males down who were their equals. They always said they deserved to marry up like to a professor or Doctor. Why isn’t an equal partner good enough?Or maybe we’re just highly desirable? Not sure what, The Wall is | /r/MensRights | 24/01/23 12:16 AM |
| 0 | Why do women always have to “marry up?” In college most of my class was girls putting males down who were their equals. They always said they deserved to marry up like to a professor or Doctor. Why isn’t an equal partner good enough?I, and my two best friends all are dating/marrying people with higher levels of pay/education. Maybe it’s a stereotype, and I don’t have the statistics, but there are plenty of women who don’t marry up. | /r/MensRights | 23/01/23 11:13 PM |
| 1 | what are things feminist has done for the betterment of society as a whole?No, it means you don’t actually know what you’re talking about and think you’re smarter than you actually are. I’ve given you a few specifics on my argument and you’ve yet to provide one. It’s a very simple task, but you’ve yet to do it. | /r/MensRights | 01/01/23 02:40 PM |
| 2 | what are things feminist has done for the betterment of society as a whole?Your comments are these broad, cryptic comments that avoid actually saying anything that can be criticized. Two comments and you haven’t actually said what you’re referring to. If you don’t on your next comment, I’m done commenting. I won’t play that game. As far as qualifying my comment, in the 40s there was a push against new deal policies which led to weaker working conditions. This strengthened during the 60s-70s and continue today. The Powell Memorandum is a good example of this | /r/MensRights | 30/12/22 02:03 PM |
| 1 | what are things feminist has done for the betterment of society as a whole?That’s all this sub is. It’s not men’s rights, it’s complain about women | /r/MensRights | 30/12/22 04:33 AM |
| 1 | what are things feminist has done for the betterment of society as a whole?What else happened in the 1970s A huge push by corporations and conservatives to weaken labor. Look at the history of unions, for example. I assume you’re trying to say women entering the workforce caused the downturn you’re referring to. But, correlation does not equal causation | /r/MensRights | 30/12/22 04:30 AM |
| -9 | He’s been rotting in Russian jail for four years for no reason. She broke a Russian law. But of course US focused on her release In exchange for a genocidal Arms dealer. Man still stranded in Russian gulag speaks out after Griner's release.This has nothing to do with gender. This has everything to do with the name. https://www.npr.org/2022/04/27/1094988296/trevor-reed-russia-prisoner-exchange Here’s a male, American prisoner, in Russia, being exchanged. Same country, same year, both exchanges, this one was male. You can’t play the victim in this situation Edit: so many downvotes for being correct | /r/MensRights | 09/12/22 01:15 AM |
| 1 | How does this subreddit get in trouble but witches vs patriarchy doesn't?You’re complaint that we’re talking about men’s issues. You’re not talking about mens issues, you’re complaining and celebrating when negative things happen to women. These are different things. Bringing down women is not the same as lifting up men. I agree there’s an issue with men and homelessness. I agree there’s an issue with men in suicide. But where are these posts? The top posts aren’t about these issues, they’re about bringing down women. The other day there was a post celebrating women … | /r/MensRights | 12/11/22 02:44 PM |
| -1 | How does this subreddit get in trouble but witches vs patriarchy doesn't?Aaaaaand you prove my point with one simple post. Just take a quick look. Here are the top 3 posts from each sub over the past week Can men not use all gender bathrooms - complaining. Post is purely anecdotal. There’s no way of telling if this is true or not. If it’s true, it could be a statistical outlier Feminists are mad that false rape accusers are getting prosecuted and jailed in the UK - antifeminist post, not pro men post. It’s a “hate” post. This is also one case in the story. It also ig… | /r/MensRights | 11/11/22 03:29 PM |
| -11 | How does this subreddit get in trouble but witches vs patriarchy doesn't?I’ve never been to that sub, but I follow this one. The biggest difference I see is that sub seems to be much more positive and lifting everyone up. This one is just complaints and whining about how unfair things are. Scrolling through this sub, some of the posts are about a women not getting a tough enough sentence or how attractive women aren’t getting higher grades or complaints about feminism. Over there, they’re celebrating states keeping abortion available and showing off their crafts. Thi… | /r/MensRights | 10/11/22 09:10 PM |
| 2 | Anyone tired of movies where 4’2” tall women massacre 42 military trained men?This sub: I hate how the military is overwhelming men. Also this sub: I hate when movies show only military men getting killed | /r/MensRights | 03/11/22 08:23 PM |
| 1 | 44% of young women identify as liberal vs 25% of young menI don’t. There are good people on both sides. I was simply pointing out that there are good feminists that do want equality. | /r/MensRights | 14/10/22 07:26 PM |
| 1 | 44% of young women identify as liberal vs 25% of young menThere are some feminists who truly believe in equality. Just like there are some mens rights activists who believe in equality. There are also people on both who don’t believe in equality. This belief that, the other side is 100% bad is some real fucked up shit. My post/question was simply pointing out that, if someone believes the “others” are 100% bad and “we” are good, that’s some cult like, hitler type propaganda | /r/MensRights | 14/10/22 07:11 PM |
| -5 | 44% of young women identify as liberal vs 25% of young menThe is literally what he said, there are feminists who truly believe in equality No there are not. Implying that no feminist believes in equality. I’m sure there is at least one. This is the brainwashing of subs like this. “They’re the enemy. They’re what’s holding us down. Everything we do is good. Everything they do is bad.” That’s insanely scary. That’s some literal cult like Hitler shit going on. | /r/MensRights | 14/10/22 04:54 PM |
| -16 | 44% of young women identify as liberal vs 25% of young menAh yes. All of the others are bad and all of us are good. Good to know. | /r/MensRights | 14/10/22 04:09 PM |
| -3 | 44% of young women identify as liberal vs 25% of young menSo there are no supporters of mens rights that truly believe in equality? | /r/MensRights | 14/10/22 03:42 PM |
| 1 | Some more equality about to hit Swiss womenGo through my posts and quote and provide the link where I said only men should fight. I’ll wait | /r/MensRights | 05/10/22 08:53 PM |
| 2 | Some more equality about to hit Swiss womenthe form of equality you prefer. I prefer no one to be required to sign up for conscription. That’s equality and freedom | /r/MensRights | 05/10/22 06:56 PM |
| 0 | Some more equality about to hit Swiss womenI’m not German and can’t read German. It still applies though. Change happens when people act. If enough men stop signing up for conscription, things will change. | /r/MensRights | 05/10/22 05:48 PM |
| 2 | Some more equality about to hit Swiss womenI’m speaking from the point of view of America because 1. I’m American and 2. American is the most influential country in the world and affects almost every other country. It doesn’t matter though. Most countries can follow the same idea. Men dying in wars is bad. Women also dying in wars doesn’t make men dying in wars better | /r/MensRights | 05/10/22 05:45 PM |
| 2 | Some more equality about to hit Swiss womenWhat? Your last two comments have made no sense. Are you drunk? | /r/MensRights | 05/10/22 05:22 PM |
| 1 | Some more equality about to hit Swiss womenIf the majority of males didn’t do it, they wouldn’t be able to jail all of them. You need a movement. Right now the majority of women support conscription Source? https://news.gallup.com/poll/221921/half-americans-favor-mandatory-national-service.aspx it’s actually men who support mandatory national service. Most women are against it. | /r/MensRights | 05/10/22 05:22 PM |
| 0 | Some more equality about to hit Swiss womenThat’s a good reason to not do anything at all | /r/MensRights | 05/10/22 05:18 PM |
| 2 | Some more equality about to hit Swiss womenWho’s the threat to America? | /r/MensRights | 05/10/22 05:12 PM |
| -3 | Some more equality about to hit Swiss womenWe’re literally going in the opposite direction. You want to stop conscription? Have a mass movement of men not sign up for it. Have a march on Washington to protest it. What’s this solving? What have you done to prevent it for men? You sit on your couch and hit an upvote for stupid posts like this | /r/MensRights | 05/10/22 05:03 PM |
| 2 | Some more equality about to hit Swiss womenYou think North Korea is a threat to the US? They’re about as big of a threat as Iraq and Afghanistan. The US has the most powerful military in the world. We continue to invade other countries for pathetic reasons like weapons of mass destruction even though there’s no evidence. How is it fair that men should die in a war while woman can stay at home. How will an increase in women help that? Why aren’t you asking, why are so many men going off to pointless wars? Making things worse for women doe… | /r/MensRights | 05/10/22 05:01 PM |
| 0 | Some more equality about to hit Swiss womenSounds like a good reason for the US to scale down their military. Not a reason to have women apply for selective services | /r/MensRights | 05/10/22 04:54 PM |
| 0 | Some more equality about to hit Swiss womenEquality is neither men or women have conscription. Both should sign up for conscription is authoritarian. How are you guys so dumb about this? Cheering this on is tyranny for men and women. Having neither sign up for conscription is Liberty for both men and women. | /r/MensRights | 05/10/22 04:44 PM |
| -10 | Some more equality about to hit Swiss womenOr they now have even more people to use and they’ll continue to use all the men and all the women. | /r/MensRights | 05/10/22 04:02 PM |
| -13 | Some more equality about to hit Swiss womenLike I said to the other comment, who had a nearly identical comment.. What an awful excuse to avoid any actual change. How does this help men? It’s like cheering because your enemy’s house is on fire while yours is burning to the ground. | /r/MensRights | 05/10/22 03:37 PM |
| 0 | Some more equality about to hit Swiss womenI’m not sure where you’re from, but I’m talking about the US. When was the last time the US needed the military to defend ourselves? We send people to Iraq and Afghanistan for bullshit reasons and then men come back with PTSD and commit suicide and become homeless. Is it really that needed? | /r/MensRights | 05/10/22 03:36 PM |
| -7 | Some more equality about to hit Swiss womenHowever, the world still needs armies due to several reasons Yet, you didn’t list a single one Your reasons why they’ll help are ridiculous. More soldiers to support each other? Support how? More soldiers with more PTSD to support each other? Wouldn’t it be better to have no one with ptsd? War has no positives unless you’re a wealthy shareholder for Boeing, Northrop Grumman, or Lockheed Martin. | /r/MensRights | 05/10/22 03:33 PM |
| -14 | Some more equality about to hit Swiss womenWhat an awful excuse to avoid any actual change. How does this help men? It’s like cheering because your enemy’s house is on fire while yours is burning to the ground. | /r/MensRights | 05/10/22 02:50 PM |
| -29 | Some more equality about to hit Swiss womenThis is the wrong way. Use some logic. Including women doesn’t solve the issues men face who’ve been in the military. And the people who earn a profit from the military now earn even more. Men should be in support to move to where women are. Remove men and you remove all the issues that come with it. You lower PTSD. You lower mental health issues. You lower homeless vets. This shouldn’t be supported. We should support men not being required for conscription and selective service | /r/MensRights | 05/10/22 02:19 PM |
| 1 | Iran protests for women's rights: Men taking most of the risks, as usual. Less than 1/10 of the arrested are women.Source? | /r/MensRights | 28/09/22 07:32 PM |
| 1 | Iran protests for women's rights: Men taking most of the risks, as usual. Less than 1/10 of the arrested are women.You’re the one quoting it. The burden of proof falls on you | /r/MensRights | 27/09/22 06:03 PM |
| 2 | Iran protests for women's rights: Men taking most of the risks, as usual. Less than 1/10 of the arrested are women.I never said it was all men. It’s also not 1% of men. Where is your 1% statistic coming from? Link the source or stop saying it. | /r/MensRights | 27/09/22 04:49 PM |
| 1 | Iran protests for women's rights: Men taking most of the risks, as usual. Less than 1/10 of the arrested are women.Where did I say that? Quote me where I said that. In Iran, there is a law that women are required to wear specific attire when in public. The consequences of not following this law can be jail, fines, beatings. That is oppression of women. It was a woman’s death that parked the protests, not men deciding to stand up to the laws. This isn’t the first time protests have happened because of this law. My argument is every women is oppressed by these laws. No man is. And it’s men that run the country… | /r/MensRights | 27/09/22 03:13 PM |
| 0 | Iran protests for women's rights: Men taking most of the risks, as usual. Less than 1/10 of the arrested are women.1) so what? 2) men out on the streets are oppressing women too. I have no idea how many, but regular male citizens are for the law. This would have been overturned long ago if everyone wanted it removed, but many male citizens are for this law | /r/MensRights | 27/09/22 12:32 PM |
| 1 | Iran protests for women's rights: Men taking most of the risks, as usual. Less than 1/10 of the arrested are women.You conveniently left out where I said we can support women in this situation in your original quote of me. I’m talking about the law that stated all this. The law people are being arrested for applies to men and women. It’s not oppressing men even if they’re being arrested at higher rates. There are over 42 million women in Iran and all are affected by the hijab law. The punishment is jail, fines, or beatings. Or in a most recent case, death. Women are the ones being oppressed by this law. And … | /r/MensRights | 26/09/22 08:55 PM |
| 0 | Iran protests for women's rights: Men taking most of the risks, as usual. Less than 1/10 of the arrested are women.Oh, I see. You don’t know what the protests were about. The protests were because a woman was killed while in custody. She broke the mandatory hijab law. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahsa_Amini_protests https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hijab_by_country#Iran In Iran, since 1981, after the 1979 Islamic Revolution, the hijab has become compulsory. All women are required to wear loose-fitting clothing and a headscarf in public Notice that the law is for only women. So, to correct your answer, the… | /r/MensRights | 26/09/22 08:34 PM |
| 0 | Iran protests for women's rights: Men taking most of the risks, as usual. Less than 1/10 of the arrested are women.And who does the law affect? | /r/MensRights | 26/09/22 08:11 PM |
| -1 | Iran protests for women's rights: Men taking most of the risks, as usual. Less than 1/10 of the arrested are women.The men that were arrested are the ones fighting against it. but the ones upholding the laws are overwhelmingly men. Theyre two groups and aren’t in the same category, but it’s men that are upholding the law and the ones murdering/oppressing women. This isn’t a difficult subject. There are good men, but men are the oppressors. The “bad guys” are made up entirely, or mostly, men | /r/MensRights | 26/09/22 06:37 PM |
| 0 | Iran protests for women's rights: Men taking most of the risks, as usual. Less than 1/10 of the arrested are women.Women were the ones being oppressed. Oppression is bad no matter who it’s against. In this case it’s against women. | /r/MensRights | 26/09/22 05:58 PM |
| 1 | Iran protests for women's rights: Men taking most of the risks, as usual. Less than 1/10 of the arrested are women.Being brainwashed into believing something doesn’t give you an excuse to continue it. There were plenty of people at the time who believed owning slaves was bad. Even slave owners questioned if having slaves was bad. | /r/MensRights | 26/09/22 04:04 PM |
| 1 | Iran protests for women's rights: Men taking most of the risks, as usual. Less than 1/10 of the arrested are women.You’re not even smart enough to make a valid argument. You deflect to a different subject. “Uh, we’ll, men die in wars.” You also stole my line, you couldn’t even come up with your own. Men and women can both be oppressed. We’re discussing a situation when women were being oppressed by men. In your example, guess who’s oppressing men. Other men. Women aren’t forcing men to be soldiers, it’s the government…which is ran by men! Fuck man. This is an honest question. Have you graduated high school y… | /r/MensRights | 26/09/22 03:48 PM |
| 2 | Iran protests for women's rights: Men taking most of the risks, as usual. Less than 1/10 of the arrested are women.The subject is women being oppressed by men and men murdering women because they’re not acting like they’re told to do in Iran. That has nothing to do with war or workplace deaths. If women weren’t oppressed, those things would still happen, so they aren’t relevant to the issue. Men can die in war and on the job site and women can still be oppressed. There is no connection between them The only reason you’d bring up war and job deaths is because you can’t defend your position on the subject anym… | /r/MensRights | 26/09/22 03:29 PM |
| 2 | Iran protests for women's rights: Men taking most of the risks, as usual. Less than 1/10 of the arrested are women.…wtf. This isn’t a difficult idea. You’re thinking way too hard about this. You don’t commend someone for not doing a bad thing. What kind of a warped view is that? Hey, good job not raping that drunk person. That’s not commendable, that’s what should happen. We shouldn’t congratulate slave owners for releasing slaves because that’s what they should have never had slaves in the first place. Not oppressing anyone in the first place is commendable | /r/MensRights | 26/09/22 03:24 PM |
| 2 | Iran protests for women's rights: Men taking most of the risks, as usual. Less than 1/10 of the arrested are women.The subject is the riots in Iran where women are oppressed by men. It has nothing to do with war or the workplace. It’s a simple red herring. You don’t want to talk about how women are being oppressed in Iran so you brought up topics that doesn’t have to do with the riots in Iran. And don’t make me responsible for some guy in Iran killing a woman. I’m not making you responsable. But you brought up the topic, so you must care about it, so I’m simply explaining why your view is a bad one. | /r/MensRights | 26/09/22 02:59 PM |
| 3 | Iran protests for women's rights: Men taking most of the risks, as usual. Less than 1/10 of the arrested are women.Don’t change the subject. It’s more than a “dress code”. It’s oppression of women. The “dress code” led to the murder of women…by men. | /r/MensRights | 26/09/22 02:01 PM |
| -4 | Iran protests for women's rights: Men taking most of the risks, as usual. Less than 1/10 of the arrested are women.It’s MEN are doing the oppressing. When men are in the wrong, you stand up to them. Just like when women are in the wrong, you stand up to them. Not all men are oppressing them, but it is only men who are in government positions. They aren’t doing it “on the backs of men” because the men are along side them. It was a women that was murdered that started the riots. It’s women who are forced (mostly by men) to wear hijabs. If you believe people should not be oppressed, then you should be on the si… | /r/MensRights | 26/09/22 01:53 PM |
| -12 | Iran protests for women's rights: Men taking most of the risks, as usual. Less than 1/10 of the arrested are women.I’m probably going to get some heat for this, but men in men’s rights would most likely fall in the oppressing group. I mean, look at comments. Look at what the original post said. Many of the commenters and for sure the original poster wouldn’t be out alongside the women. You fight for freedom no matter who you’re fighting next or who you’re fighting against. | /r/MensRights | 26/09/22 01:21 PM |
| -19 | Iran protests for women's rights: Men taking most of the risks, as usual. Less than 1/10 of the arrested are women.Lol Jesus Christ. It was MEN who oppressed women in the first place. Men helped lead for the womens right to vote…but they were also the ones that made it so women couldn’t vote in the first place. You can’t give credit to the oppressor for stopping the oppression. Sorry man, can’t play victim with this one. You can’t take everything and spin it to make men play the victim. You can support the Iran women in this situation because oppression is bad no matter who it’s against, including men. | /r/MensRights | 26/09/22 01:08 PM |
| -1 | I hate Onlycunts...Wow, this is some heavy neckbeard stuff right here Because only a cunt would prey on the weakness of lonely men. What a victim card play here. No one is forcing you to go to the website. We could turn this around and say, it’s unfortunate that creating an only fans account is such a lucrative option for women that many create accounts. Like, they’re not being paid enough in their career/can make more/supplement their incomes by creating content. A post like this is hurting the mens rights argume… | /r/MensRights | 25/09/22 10:12 PM |
| -3 | I did a studySame study, different results | /r/MensRights | 13/09/22 06:25 PM |
| -7 | I did a studyNo, when I did my study, males had more responses. | /r/MensRights | 13/09/22 06:16 PM |
| 0 | I sent 100 applications as a man and a woman. It's MUCH better being a womanGreat way to prove your point. “There’s a lot out there, but I can’t provide any.” | /r/MensRights | 13/09/22 01:46 PM |
| 1 | I sent 100 applications as a man and a woman. It's MUCH better being a womanSince it so common, can you find these results and link them? | /r/MensRights | 13/09/22 12:54 PM |
| -23 | I sent 100 applications as a man and a woman. It's MUCH better being a womanThe research I did proves you’re wrong | /r/MensRights | 13/09/22 05:01 AM |
| -39 | I sent 100 applications as a man and a woman. It's MUCH better being a womanCan you please provide your research paper that has the data with each variable accounted for? A few months ago, I did this same thing you did and I actually got the opposite results. Every job that had a male name got a callback and out of the female names, I only got 7 callbacks and they were voicemails telling the female they should stay in the kitchen. | /r/MensRights | 13/09/22 02:48 AM |
| 43 | Conservative candidate Yoon Seok-yeol heavily supported by young men, wins presidential election. Young women protest ‘election of misogyny’ in South KoreaI just saw another post about this guy being an incel/MGTOW (not sure what the acronym means). Interesting how views are different depending on the sub | /r/MensRights | 10/03/22 12:48 AM |
| 3 | USA: Nebraska woman avoids death sentence for store clerk slaying. Her male accomplice was convicted of the same charge but he got the death penalty, she was spared.He admitted to doing it, said he should receive the death penalty for doing it, and said she wasn’t even in the room while he killed the woman. He 100% admitted guilt and gave her an alibi. The title misrepresents what happened. The victim was a store clerk, but the murder is unrelated to her working as a store clerk | /r/MensRights | 09/11/21 01:14 PM |
| 3 | USA: Nebraska woman avoids death sentence for store clerk slaying. Her male accomplice was convicted of the same charge but he got the death penalty, she was spared.Sure, overall men are much more likely, but in this case we should expect the male to receive a harsher punishment. So this case is a bad example to use, which makes the men’s rights arguments look worse and lose credibility since it’s so easy to argue against | /r/MensRights | 09/11/21 01:07 PM |
| 12 | USA: Nebraska woman avoids death sentence for store clerk slaying. Her male accomplice was convicted of the same charge but he got the death penalty, she was spared.https://theindependent.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/the-murder-of-sydney-loofe-a-timeline-of-the-aubrey-trail-and-bailey-boswell-trials/article_2a8dfa92-27b4-5c8f-a2da-e0fce6f0f304.html You should read about the case instead of just posing inaccurate information about the case. This wasn’t two people going in and killing a store clerk together where they both played an equal part. The male literally said, “I will say I’m accountable for it” and “a life is a life-that’s the rules in my world. … | /r/MensRights | 09/11/21 03:52 AM |
| 1 | Why male authors are being written out of fiction: As a female writer sparks a storm by saying too many novels are penned by womenI don’t know anything about comics, so you can correct me, but what I’ve looked up is, if you’re referring to Natalie Portman’s character, she’s not Thor, she’s a different character. Regardless, that’s not the debate at hand. We’re discussing who influences the decisions. If you look at the Natalie Portman movie (if that’s what you’re referencing) look who the directors and producers are. The director is a male. The two producers listed, both males. They’re the decision makers. They’re the ones… | /r/MensRights | 27/10/21 05:18 PM |
| 1 | Why male authors are being written out of fiction: As a female writer sparks a storm by saying too many novels are penned by womenYou helped prove my point. Whenever a woman can do a better job, she definitely should be the one getting the position Ok, can you prove than women aren’t better fiction writers? If women sell more books, by that metric, they’re better fiction writers. So there should be more women writers. and things like sports Thank you! Perfect example. You said “something that’s objectively watched predominantly by men”. Because men watch it football coaches have been 99.999% men. That’s because men watch f… | /r/MensRights | 27/10/21 12:04 AM |
| -1 | Why male authors are being written out of fiction: As a female writer sparks a storm by saying too many novels are penned by womenJesus Christ. Are you an idiot or do you not understand my argument? When did I say there should be no male gynecologists? My entire argument is that, if one gender does or is affected by something more than the other, there is a higher chance they will be doing that profession. Not, they only can do that job. Here, to help you out, let me quote myself. There are MORE women that will do a better job working in the makeup industry. Notice I said MORE, not only, not always, more. Romance novels ar… | /r/MensRights | 26/10/21 08:55 PM |
| -8 | Why male authors are being written out of fiction: As a female writer sparks a storm by saying too many novels are penned by womenGood grief. You’re actually going to continue to defend this position? What you have between your legs DOES have something to do with your target audience. I’ve never worn a maxi pad. I would do a really bad job working for a company that makes them. I assume you would too. I don’t know, maybe you wear them. Women would be better in those positions because they have experience with maxi pads. Same with make up. There are more women that will do a better job working in the makeup industry. Romanc… | /r/MensRights | 26/10/21 05:22 PM |
| -7 | Why male authors are being written out of fiction: As a female writer sparks a storm by saying too many novels are penned by womenIt’s not about who the target audience is It 100% is. In a capitalist society, you want to make the most profit, so you target a certain audience. That’s why they don’t target men for tampons. That’s why they don’t target kids for financial advisors. That’s why they target women for romance novels. It’s about who’s in position to influence who So, let’s ignore the fact that men have dominated these positions throughout history, (and still do in most fields) because that’s a very simple rebuttal.… | /r/MensRights | 26/10/21 02:32 PM |
| 9 | Why male authors are being written out of fiction: As a female writer sparks a storm by saying too many novels are penned by womenIt’s also important to note that, from the article, women read more than men. Like the article notes, if you do something more often, you’ll be more inclined to work in that area (people that read more(women) become writers more often). The article also states that men do more screen writing (like above, because they watch more tv) | /r/MensRights | 26/10/21 01:40 PM |
| 1 | Men are no longer allowed to describe the physical appearance of women in booksYeah, he is dumb for doing it. But that doesn’t mean, as you claimed in your title, “Men are no longer allowed to describe the physical appearance of women in books”. It means one author folded and decided to not describe the physical appearance of women. That’s one author, one! Many other authors said he shouldn’t do it. This isn’t something to waste your time and energy on. It’s a non issue | /r/MensRights | 12/10/21 09:05 PM |
| 1 | Men are no longer allowed to describe the physical appearance of women in booksHow is that a rule. Nearly every author is writing physical descriptions about female characters. He’s the outlier. Seems like the rule is that authors should write about any character they like. When everyone is doing it except one person, that one person is not conforming to the rule | /r/MensRights | 12/10/21 07:14 PM |
| 1 | Men are no longer allowed to describe the physical appearance of women in booksconfirm to the rules What rules? | /r/MensRights | 10/10/21 03:25 PM |
| 1 | Men are no longer allowed to describe the physical appearance of women in booksso all men are not allowed to write about the physical appearance of women according to this group. That’s completely wrong. Did you actually read that article? This one author, who got backlash decided not to write about women’s appearance. Every author gets backlash. There are millions (?) of male authors. One male author does not equate to “men are no longer allowed to describe the physical appearance of women in books.” In fact, in the article, there are other authors that said what he was d… | /r/MensRights | 10/10/21 02:50 PM |
| 1 | Men are no longer allowed to describe the physical appearance of women in booksWhat’s fucking joke. This isn’t true at all. Here’s the title of the article: Author Sebastian Faulks says fear of offending readers means he no longer describes what female characters look like in his books - but Booker Prize winner Bernardine Evaristo slams the idea as 'ridiculous' One fucking author decided not to do it. Stop posting stupid shit. This doesn’t help the cause at all because people will read this and laugh. It’s 1) not even true, so you’ve just lost credibility and 2) it’s so pe… | /r/MensRights | 10/10/21 02:08 PM |
| 0 | How some men are feminist?First, it wasn’t anti-male. I don’t understand how you’ve come to that conclusion. Second, the quote was a daily accurate reflection of the time. Those aren’t rebuttals when you change my argument. Your “rebuttals” are similar to what people do on witness stands when they’re guilty but trying to avoid lying. It’s what Bill a Clinton did to avoid lying to the country about his sexual relationship with Monica. It’s skirting around the actual questions so you don’t prove my point | /r/MensRights | 29/09/21 12:13 AM |
| 1 | How some men are feminist?No…he literally does. Look at the string between him and I. He defends it the entire time. The second comment says it | /r/MensRights | 28/09/21 10:47 PM |
| 0 | How some men are feminist?…yes, because arguing anti-male from text that was written in 1848 is a horrible argument. But saying homelessness is predominantly males, that’s a solid fact. Now, don’t take my comment and twist it around so it fits your agenda. | /r/MensRights | 28/09/21 10:44 PM |
| 1 | How some men are feminist?Correct. And one obstacle is when people bring up bad arguments and die on a hill for them. When people barely listen in the first place, good, factual arguments should be presented, not, 150 years ago someone wrote this, so feminism is anti-male. | /r/MensRights | 28/09/21 09:48 PM |
| -1 | How some men are feminist?They don’t take it seriously, partly, because people bring up things from 1848 to provide evidence that feminism is anti-male. I agree with some of the stuff discussed on here, but a lot of it is so pointless or just playing the victim that people just ignore it. Bring up male homelessness, bring up male drug abuse, bring up male suicide. That’s solid facts that should be discussed. But a document that’s 150 years old as being proof feminism is anti-male…give me a break | /r/MensRights | 28/09/21 08:55 PM |
| -1 | How some men are feminist?Come on now. You’re just being ridiculous at this point. If the system… Oppression of anyone is bad. Not all people of one group are evil. It’s very simple. You don’t have to go on this philosophical trip to get the answer. You mean no responsibilities. Nope, never said that. Again, you’re reframing my point to benefit your narrative. As for your question, having not been in that position I couldn’t say Give me a fucking break. What a joke of an answer. You’re not answering it because you know t… | /r/MensRights | 28/09/21 07:23 PM |
| -1 | How some men are feminist?Good grief, this is ridiculous. It describes a state…to function. 1) No, it doesn’t. Maybe it does for you, but you should reread it without bias. It’s describing the way things were at the time. 2) if it does describe “winning” and “losing”, like you say, men were winning. And women’s weren’t drafted… Would you rather be free and the potential to be be drafted or have no liberties and no potential to be drafted? Would you rather be a slave not drafted or a free citizen drafted? Pretty poor argu… | /r/MensRights | 28/09/21 05:42 PM |
| -1 | How some men are feminist?What does this have to do with your quote? The quote is from 1848. Before that, women could not vote (and couldn’t for another 60 years). That means all laws that affected women, they didn’t have a say in. That is bordering on tyranny or at the very least allowing tyranny to be possible. Up until 1848, a woman’s property became her husband’s once married. That’s usurpation of man towards woman. There was coverture, where a woman’s legal rights were her husbands. The quote you provided was an acc… | /r/MensRights | 28/09/21 04:31 PM |
| -6 | How some men are feminist?How is that part you cited anti male? Is this from The declaration of sentiments by Elizabeth Cady Stanton? It was created in 1848. Sorry, but what you cited, is kind of right. No voting rights, just started being able to own land. Edit: -2 upvotes. No responses. You wanna know how you’re in a cult? When people only agree and disagree with what that cult agrees and disagrees with. absolute tyranny over her. How was, in 1848, there not tyranny over women? No responses in an hour, just downvotes. … | /r/MensRights | 28/09/21 01:45 PM |
| 0 | How come guys always have to 'work on themselves'?Haha, well, you sold me. I guess it hardly ever happens. You got any stats on that? What do you mean by hardly? Is this a 1:100000 ratio or 1:2 ratio? Are you a women? If not, how do you know it hardly ever happens to women? The fact that this comment (as of now) got 12 upvotes (compared to the 5 from the post by a women) gives a bit of evidence about how some on this sub blindly follow anything that is pro men. | /r/MensRights | 20/09/21 01:59 PM |
| 2 | Arrested falsely“And even women that aren’t the mother of your children still dictate your life and youe kids life over you.” Do we though, chief? | /r/MensRights | 31/08/21 07:05 PM |
| 1 | Arrested falselySo then you agree that he did escalate the situation | /r/MensRights | 31/08/21 06:49 PM |
| 0 | Arrested falselyFrom the original post “And I was just like “…. okay bring your fat@$$ on lol”” How is that not escalating the situation? | /r/MensRights | 31/08/21 06:42 PM |
| -1 | Arrested falselyHaha, so maybe I should have typed it better or put OP ONLY blamed* or had a comma after happened. My point was a man was the one that called the police. Yet, he never puts any blame on the husband. the woman brought the dude bruh What’s you’re argument here? That because the woman brought the man, it’s still the woman’s fault? The husband called the cops. Instead of OP escalating the situation, he could have called the police and explained what happened. Again, multiple parties are at fault. Me… | /r/MensRights | 31/08/21 06:29 PM |
| -1 | Arrested falselyCan anyone comprehend anything on here? This post and the previous one both accused me of saying something completely different from what I posted. At what point did I say we should think of the women? If you reread my post, I say the original post only says women dictate their life. Then, I go on to say the post should say men AND women or people. I’ve never said women aren’t to blame in this story, only that men are ALSO to blame. Do you understand the difference or do you need me to water it … | /r/MensRights | 31/08/21 06:10 PM |
| 0 | Arrested falselyWhere did I say anything about OP not having the right to take his son back? My comment was about how the OP only blamed women for what happened when a man was the one that called the cops. He literally wrote “even women that aren’t the mother of your children still dictate your life”. The husband is the one who called the cops though. The husband had just as much, if not more, to do with the outcome of the situation as the women. But, the post mentions nothing about that. It doesn’t say “even m… | /r/MensRights | 31/08/21 05:14 PM |
| 11 | Arrested falselyThat’s an unfortunate story. But, it was a male that called the cops. You should also be pissed at the husband. You could have spoke to the husband and calmed the situation down, but you instigated it…with the husband. He’s the one that called the cops and told them you have the gun. You’re not putting any fault on him even though the cops showed up because of what he did. | /r/MensRights | 31/08/21 01:11 PM |
| 1 | If men took a vacation from maintaining cities for a year, everything would change.You said you were done. I’m not going to keep proving you wrong if you’re done. Seemed like you didn’t have any more arguments. Now your attacking me. Which is fine. You obviously have no idea about my positions. I’m not even sure what the view is. And I don’t watch any news on tv. Trevor Noah sucks. You call me a sheep? You criticized schools as indoctrination camps and then refuse to even acknowledge males are the ones that currently do and always have made the policies. Your rebuttal is, it’s… | /r/MensRights | 26/07/21 06:18 PM |
| 1 | If men took a vacation from maintaining cities for a year, everything would change.that’s the most retarded thing I’ve seen today. I guess you haven’t been looking at your own posts | /r/MensRights | 26/07/21 05:45 PM |
| 0 | If men took a vacation from maintaining cities for a year, everything would change.You keep changing you argument. There are still female construction workers. So, women can do that job. The job is important. Losing security and alarm installers is not going to destroy society. By your last statement, it seems like we agree. Losing all men or all women is bad for society. I’ve never called for all men to die (I’m a man). So I’m not going to defend anything like that. I disagree with all men should die. But I also don’t think losing all female workers (or male workers) is good.… | /r/MensRights | 26/07/21 05:44 PM |
| 1 | If men took a vacation from maintaining cities for a year, everything would change.Schools are indoctrination camps. School policy comes from state legislature. Guess which gender dominates state legislature. Males. Males are making these indoctrination camps. And there’s a strong correlation between male representation and low education. You’re making a strong case against males. I see you went after education, but you failed to say anything about healthcare. Guess which gender keeps people alive, women. You can keep making long rants, but that doesn’t mean you’re making good… | /r/MensRights | 26/07/21 05:19 PM |
| 1 | If men took a vacation from maintaining cities for a year, everything would change.Those are percent. 73.5%, not 73,500. 74.4%, not 74,400. Registered nurses, 87.4%, not 87,400. You have to read the top of the table. It says Percent of total employed. Brick masons is 40,000, not 300. Its .3%, not 300. | /r/MensRights | 26/07/21 05:08 PM |
| 2 | If men took a vacation from maintaining cities for a year, everything would change.Because I’m not being a sheep and actually criticizing bad arguments? Didn’t realize that was a female only trait. I guess more men should be like women in that sense | /r/MensRights | 26/07/21 04:45 PM |
| 2 | If men took a vacation from maintaining cities for a year, everything would change.Not sure if sarcasm or just not intelligent. I’m a man by the way. | /r/MensRights | 26/07/21 04:18 PM |
| -1 | If men took a vacation from maintaining cities for a year, everything would change.You’ve yet to provide any evidence of jobs women can’t do. I’ve gone through examples of why losing women would bring down society. (And, I agree, losing men would also bring down society). What male dominated jobs do you keep talking about? Hedge fund managers? Heads of banks? I might argue things would be better without some of those jobs. There are women engineers, so not engineering. If you’re going to argue male nurses can teach all the men to fill the jobs, then female engineers can do the… | /r/MensRights | 26/07/21 01:48 PM |
| 3 | If men took a vacation from maintaining cities for a year, everything would change.90% of nurses are women. Not half. The post says vacation, not disappear. So there are still the same amount of people. Some men in every field doesn’t matter when they’re outnumbered 10 to 1. Male nurses do 10% of the work which means if females went on vacation only 10% of the work would be done. In the first year, millions of people die that wouldn’t have. Teaching wise, elementary kids is where a huge amount of development is done. That’s mostly female teachers. And you can’t just go into an… | /r/MensRights | 26/07/21 05:41 AM |
| -3 | If men took a vacation from maintaining cities for a year, everything would change.It’s still to early to show if virtual schooling during the pandemic was good. Most evidence suggests that lower income students all fell way behind. Teacher to student ratio is incredibly important. I doubt there’s a single teacher that would say a student to teacher ratio of 1:1000 is a good learning environment. In college, sure. High school? Maybe. But anything below that and it would be an utter failure. 3 million school female teachers to replace. Basic first aid? So everyone with cancer, … | /r/MensRights | 26/07/21 04:48 AM |
| -5 | If men took a vacation from maintaining cities for a year, everything would change.Ok… That doesn’t refute my post | /r/MensRights | 26/07/21 02:48 AM |
| 0 | If men took a vacation from maintaining cities for a year, everything would change.Come on now. If women took vacation for a year, shit would hit the fan too. Our school systems would stop from the loss of teachers. A bunch of kids with nothing to do 9 months out of the year. A bunch of men would have to quit their job for childcare. Get sick? 90% of nurses are gone. Without women, the pandemic would have killed far more people. I’ve seen this type of post before and it seems like an argument that pops into someone’s head and they post it instead of taking 5 seconds to actuall… | /r/MensRights | 26/07/21 01:35 AM |
| 3 | It sucks that men aren’t allowed to display emotions because women will use it against them or start questioning their sexuality?Who do you hang out with? This has never happened to me and I don’t think I’ve ever heard any of my male friends say this either. It sounds like you’re surrounding yourself with the wrong people | /r/MensRights | 27/06/21 03:30 AM |
| 2 | When a crazy young man kills Jews we blame the White supremacist group he follows (rightly so) so when a crazy young woman kills her male children because she follows feminism, shouldn't we blame feminism?Good grief man. At this point I’m arguing with a wall. You’ve taken up too much of my time. Your brainwashed. I’ve provided evidence, analogies, statistics and you’re either confused by them or don’t understand them. You haven’t provided any information except your opinion. Think about that. I provide data and different ways of explaining things and you disagree and don’t use anything like to disprove my point. Maybe you should go search for data. That will help you explain things. At this point… | /r/MensRights | 23/06/21 03:07 PM |
| 2 | When a crazy young man kills Jews we blame the White supremacist group he follows (rightly so) so when a crazy young woman kills her male children because she follows feminism, shouldn't we blame feminism?I mean, it is true that we saw an increase in right winged violence domestic terrorism under Trump. https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/interactive/2021/domestic-terrorism-data/ So it’s not necessarily a manipulation. But, if you want to go there, the grand total of child murders is “almost nothing” as well. Removing the leading causes of child deaths, which are accidents, cancer and birth defects there were roughly 5,000 total deaths between 1-14. Not all of those were murders and not… | /r/MensRights | 23/06/21 02:35 PM |
| 0 | When a crazy young man kills Jews we blame the White supremacist group he follows (rightly so) so when a crazy young woman kills her male children because she follows feminism, shouldn't we blame feminism?First off, the topic is feminists, not women. We’re discussing whether feminists should be condemned the same way as white supremacists. You provided zero evidence that any of these women were feminists. All of them could support men’s rights and hate feminism. But that information wasn’t provided. You’ve only provided articles on deaths by mothers The second issue is the actual articles you provided. The first one seems to be pro men. The first one says “The Family Violence Death Review, releas… | /r/MensRights | 23/06/21 01:05 PM |
| 0 | When a crazy young man kills Jews we blame the White supremacist group he follows (rightly so) so when a crazy young woman kills her male children because she follows feminism, shouldn't we blame feminism?No, you completely misinterpreted my position. What happened to those kids is awful. I never said feminists should get to kill off a few babies each year as a freebie. I’ll explain my position again though. If one feminist kills her male kids, we blame her. If a million feminists (or a large amount) kill their male kids, we blame feminism. White supremacists kill and account for a large amount of domestic terrorism. We should blame white supremacy. If one white supremacist killed people, we shou… | /r/MensRights | 23/06/21 04:28 AM |
| -2 | When a crazy young man kills Jews we blame the White supremacist group he follows (rightly so) so when a crazy young woman kills her male children because she follows feminism, shouldn't we blame feminism?Do you have any statistics to back up your position? You provided one example of a feminist murdering her kids. White supremacists account for a large number of domestic terrorist attacks https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/22/white-supremacists-rightwing-domestic-terror-2020 If one person kills someone and blames it on or follows an ideology, we should blame the killing on that one individual. If multiple people kill multiple people and they blame it on or follow an … | /r/MensRights | 23/06/21 03:26 AM |
| 6 | SHE told a man ...'You shouldn't be able to breathe,' officer tells man before he dies. Apparently she signed his death warrantThis is an issue with policing. It doesn’t matter if it was a she or a he. If it was a male that said “you shouldn’t be able to breathe”, would you condemn that? If so, then it’s an issue with the policing, not the gender of the officer. You also didn’t condemn the male officers that were literally killing him. These are the things that make people ignore men’s rights. Crying foul on something a woman did when 1) nothing would have been said if a man did it and 2) nothing was said about the men … | /r/MensRights | 21/05/21 03:39 PM |
| -2 | White males are the most hated groupI’ve personally received hundreds of job adverts that stated I would be last in line for a job both because of my colour and because of what’s between my legs. Can you share, let’s say 25 of those? If you have 200, that’s only 12.5% of them. Just cross out your personal info of course. If you have hundreds, it shouldn’t take too long. Maybe an hour? | /r/MensRights | 11/05/21 01:31 AM |
| 1 | Men not being allowed to have dating standardsYou’re comparing two different things. Height and weight are not the same thing. You have to compare how people react when a man says they want a girl at least X feet tall. Or when a woman says they don’t want a highly overweight man. Maybe the issue is that you’re not connecting that these are two different things, but you’re comparing them as the same thing. | /r/MensRights | 22/04/21 07:45 PM |
| 8 | USA: English teachers have cancelled Shakespeare because of his 'white supremacy, misogyny' - and are instead using his plays to lecture in 'toxic masculinity and Marxism'Did anyone actually read the article? It’s like a 30 second read it’s so short. I assume it’s so short because what the title says is propaganda and not actually what’s happening. One person, in one journal, wrote what the title said (edit: I guess it’s a whole 8 people, not one). The article is complete propaganda. | /r/MensRights | 16/02/21 02:47 PM |
| 2 | Another Brian Banks.Completely incorrect. Here’s me: A guy was accused of rape and it was determined the woman lied. But it ruined his entire NFL career. When in fact he wasn’t good enough to get drafted | /r/MensRights | 17/07/20 01:21 AM |
| 1 | Another Brian Banks.I don’t understand why you think I care at all about money. The facts are, he was being misrepresented. And you continue to say I only care about the money...because I’m questioning why it’s misreporting him! The biggest issue I have is that it says “that was until a rape accusation” and that he was a number one pick. Those are completely incorrect. Remove the money from it. No. It creates emotion because of the false rape accusation. Sigh, no. The first few sentences represent him as someone wh… | /r/MensRights | 17/07/20 12:55 AM |
| 1 | Another Brian Banks.It’s obvious you’re only give a care if he’s worth millions or not. Not true. Not once have I ever said what happened to him was ok. I’ve actually argued the opposite. It seems like you’re making your opinions based on emotion and I’m basing it on facts | /r/MensRights | 17/07/20 12:00 AM |
| 1 | Another Brian Banks.Because misstating the facts is an issue in any situations. If she misstated the facts and it led to him being sent to prison, I’m sure you’d be upset about that. Why aren’t you upset about misstating facts about him? Because he was the one that was accused? That’s what bias is. The misrepresentation creates an emotional response that makes him viewed in a way that is not accurate. You’d probably never hear about this case if he was a 3rd string player. | /r/MensRights | 16/07/20 11:50 PM |
| -5 | Another Brian Banks.Fucking Christ. By your comment, you’re the fucking dumbass. And I’ll explain it to you, just like the other 5 people that don’t understand how an argument works. I never compared them. You completely misunderstood what I said. The woman lied about being raped. The meme lied about the player’s qualifications. I said nothing about whether one is more ethical than the other, only that they were both lying. How are you too fucking stupid to understand this? That’s not a comparison. It’s like if I c… | /r/MensRights | 16/07/20 11:16 PM |
| -2 | Another Brian Banks.No, I believe we should present things with factual information. Would you be ok if it said “That’s until he was accused of rape by a smart, courageous young lady”? | /r/MensRights | 16/07/20 10:56 PM |
| -5 | Another Brian Banks.Maybe it should have been presented correctly. I wouldn’t have said a word if it said “former college football star” instead of saying that he was a number 1 pick and that the rape accusation was the cause of him not being drafted. Just because it was true there was a false accusation, doesn’t give the freedom to misrepresent the rest of the story. If we’re just making up lies, let’s say he was the greatest man that ever lived. He was better than ghandi and Martin Luther king combined. He saved … | /r/MensRights | 16/07/20 09:49 PM |
| -5 | Another Brian Banks.imagine comparing “lying” on a fucking meme to making up rape allegations lmao. Imagine not understanding how an argument is presented. I never said lying on a meme and a false accusation are the same. I did (more or less) say that if you criticize someone of lying, you shouldn’t lie yourself. She presented a fake story to get some sort of sympathy (and possibly reward). This meme presented a fake story to get some sort of sympathy. That’s the argument. I never argued that they are unethical equ… | /r/MensRights | 16/07/20 09:35 PM |
| 2 | Another Brian Banks.Yes, again, she deserves some punishment and his life shouldn’t be ruined. Whatever those things may entail is a different discussion. Everyone can be raped and everyone can rape (that’s physically and mentally able to. Someone in a coma can’t and a 2 year old can’t). Feminists shouldn’t lie either. The pornstar can be raped too. The only issue I have is how the original argument is presented. | /r/MensRights | 16/07/20 09:21 PM |
| -1 | Another Brian Banks.You’re completely twisting my story around. I even said, right away there should be consequences for the girl. There are two issues with the post. The first is that it says Oakman was predicted to be picked first overall A whole year before the draft. Highly misleading that was until he was accused of rape two weeks before the draft Completely incorrect. He was a late round pick at best before any rape allegations came forward. instead of signing a $25 million contract... Again, misleading. A la… | /r/MensRights | 16/07/20 08:32 PM |
| -32 | Another Brian Banks.I never said they were equal. I never said lying about rape shouldn’t be taken seriously. | /r/MensRights | 16/07/20 07:56 PM |
| -49 | Another Brian Banks.God damnit! Not this again. Look, what happened sucks and there should be consequences for the girl, but this is just straight propaganda. He was expected to be picked #1 overall a whole year before the draft. During his final college year, people realized he wasn’t as good as most thought. Before the draft he was expected to be a late round draft pick, not a first rounder or even first pick. Stop spreading propaganda. That’s the issue with memes like this. A quick snippet and the truth is burie… | /r/MensRights | 16/07/20 07:46 PM |
| 6 | 1 Japanese school girl gets raped by men from the navy who're shore leave which results in the navy going Crraazzyy. Nine Afghan school boys raped by a Afghan national & a few of his buddies on US Marine base, and the Marine chain of command shrugs their shoulders.9 children were raped on a marine controlled base, not in the middle of Kabul. Yes, correct. Correct me if I’m wrong, but the one in Japan was off base. This adds yet another variable that changes the outcome. Think about this example. My buddy William and I sleep at different times. Case 1: William lives in London and I live in San Francisco. He works 9-5 hours and I work 12 hour overnight shifts. Case 2: William is my roommate. We work the same job. Our hours are the same and we commute togeth… | /r/MensRights | 15/04/20 03:37 PM |
| 16 | 1 Japanese school girl gets raped by men from the navy who're shore leave which results in the navy going Crraazzyy. Nine Afghan school boys raped by a Afghan national & a few of his buddies on US Marine base, and the Marine chain of command shrugs their shoulders.You’re ignoring the fact that there is one variable that is the same and a million others that are different. Do you agree that whales and ants are the same because they are both animals? I agree that it’s not a good thing what’s happening, but Japan and Afghanistan are completely different countries. And the relationship with the US military and the US government are completely different. Those things make these two cases completely different. | /r/MensRights | 15/04/20 02:58 PM |
| 30 | 1 Japanese school girl gets raped by men from the navy who're shore leave which results in the navy going Crraazzyy. Nine Afghan school boys raped by a Afghan national & a few of his buddies on US Marine base, and the Marine chain of command shrugs their shoulders.The issue here isn’t the sex of the victims, it’s the location of the incident. Afghanistan and Japan are completely different countries. They are both in Asia, but that’s about all they have in common. One is a developed country and works with the US, the other is a developing country and is ran with a watchful eye by the US. They have different religions, their economies are different. One is getting bombed mercilessly by the US, the other hasn’t had a military conflict with the US in decades.… | /r/MensRights | 15/04/20 02:40 PM |
| 5 | When feminists say guys can’t be good fathersI just did. I went on r/feminism (I hope that qualifies for you) and glances at maybe 75 posts. I didn’t find anything about all (or even most) guys being bad fathers. Most of the posts had to do with rape and a surprising amount, maybe 1/3 of the post, were about countries with issues (Hong Kong, Syria, developing countries) and how women are effected by these things. Again, I’ve been given absolutely zero evidence these things are said. An assumption was made with zero evidence. I’m simply ask… | /r/MensRights | 13/10/19 06:36 PM |
| 4 | When feminists say guys can’t be good fathersThanks for proving my point | /r/MensRights | 13/10/19 05:36 PM |
| 2 | When feminists say guys can’t be good fatherswhen feminists say guys can’t be good fathers They say this? Where? Any non bias links? I don’t think I’ve ever heard anyone say this. I tried looking up some quotes or statistics or some studies and nothing came up. | /r/MensRights | 13/10/19 04:42 PM |
| -2 | Analysis of accounting records yields shock finding: the U.S. women's national team soccer players were actually paid more money by USSF than the men over the past 8 years. Equal pay?You are being far too generous. | /r/MensRights | 30/07/19 01:44 PM |
| -11 | Analysis of accounting records yields shock finding: the U.S. women's national team soccer players were actually paid more money by USSF than the men over the past 8 years. Equal pay?Haha nice defense of your position. ...maybe YOU’RE being far too generous. Maybe, you turn on a woman’s game and you automatically have a bias against the women (I mean, you are in a men’s right’s sub). Maybe you’d watch a men’s game and on a missed shot you’d say “man, that looked difficult” but if you watched the same shot in a woman’s game you’d say “if it was a men’s game they’d make that.” Maybe there’s not much difference between the women and men. I donno, maybe I’m wrong...but maybe you… | /r/MensRights | 30/07/19 12:44 PM |
| 1 | One of the many cases of how false rape accusations can destroy a man’s lifeI’m not arguing that false accusation is ok. I’m arguing that it is a highly misleading post. Was predicted to be the first overall draft pick. This is true, but highly misleading. He was predicted to be first overall a year before the draft. Weeks before the draft he was considered a late round pick. That is a much better assessment. that’s until he was accused of rape the same year two weeks before the draft. Incorrect. The rape moved him to an “undraftable” status, but again, he was not consi… | /r/MensRights | 08/03/19 05:05 PM |
| 8 | One of the many cases of how false rape accusations can destroy a man’s lifeThis was posted yesterday. This is highly misleading. He was projected #1 in a mock draft for 2016, a few days after the 2015 draft. Almost a year before his draft. Through his last college year, his production would drop through the season and many teams considered him a late round pick before this even happened. Once this event happened, he did go into an “undraftable” status, but to say he went from a #1 pick to not playing because of this one event is entirely incorrect. He also had issues a… | /r/MensRights | 08/03/19 04:58 AM |
| 7 | So sadThis is highly misleading. He was projected #1 in a mock draft for 2016, a few days after the 2015 draft. Almost a year before his draft. Through his last college year, his production would drop through the season and many teams considered him a late round pick before this even happened. Once this event happened, he did go into an “undraftable” status, but to say he went from a #1 pick to not playing because of this one event is entirely incorrect. He also had issues at penn state where he was r… | /r/MensRights | 07/03/19 03:11 PM |
| -4 | THIS is why I hate male feminists, this bullshit RIGHT HERE.How many women signed the Declaration of Independence? Zero. How many women served in the house or senate before 1900? Zero. Were most of the representatives rich men? Yes, but they were all men. Yes, not all men were allowed to vote. But, just so you know, no woman was allowed to vote for the first (nearly) 150 years of the US, no matter how rich or poor. Poor men were eventually allowed to vote before any woman was. So it was part economics, but mostly gender. Your argument is because not all … | /r/MensRights | 14/11/18 11:58 PM |
| -20 | THIS is why I hate male feminists, this bullshit RIGHT HERE....so who stared slavery and segregation? And who were the slave owners? And who voted on laws to basically continue slavery and segregation for hundreds of years? | /r/MensRights | 14/11/18 11:16 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter