TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

wtfffffffff10 Archive

View 0 posts and 93 comments by wtfffffffff10 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

When "hoes" hook up with men, they are hooking up with the men that already get sex. So "hoes" have no effect on sex vs sexless ratio and other ratios of the SMV.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/20 06:58 PM
1

lmao wtf hahaha.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/20 08:05 PM
1

how much do these hookers cost? how do you make the money?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/20 08:00 PM
1

Okay well obviously they are looking for a very specific type of man that is into a more traditional type of courtship. Not all quality guys are into that (I would say most aren't), but I guess they are looking for something more specialized. Personally I don't like the idea of being the provider / pursuer / etc. and I really don't like the idea of exchanging what I provide & my effort with "appreciation" and "investment back into me". I would rather be with someone who wants to be equal in plan…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/20 05:55 AM
1

Not sure what you're saying. That HVM aren't the same as quality guys? That a man has to put effort into the date (which includes their appearance) whereas a woman has to put effort into into just their appearance? FDS regularly talks about how the man should be doing all of the effort in dating and the woman should only put effort into themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/20 05:21 AM
1

The poster I was replying to said the FDS standards are not unreasonable for "most men", that's why I said that. I agree with what you're saying; they are NOT looking for "most men"
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/20 04:11 AM
1

Ok that makes sense. Even still, I don't think many quality guys are going to want to go through that effort unless they already know the girl is a quality girl herself. But that is kind of paradoxical because in my mind a quality girl is one that at least puts in 50% of the effort. Then again, I'm that knowledgeable about FDS so idk.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/20 04:10 AM
1

From what I've seen, they don't do anything other than expensive dinners, which like I said, can be $60+ for two people easily. If they are down for home cooked food, then I agree, the cost can become way more reasonable, but I was under the impression that they weren't.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/20 03:50 AM
1

Yeah, I meant unrealistic as in unrealistic to expect good men to do it, not afford it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/20 03:40 AM
1

FDS is against the whole "older man and younger women". Where I live, easily $60+. FDS is against picnics / drinks / hikes etc., at least during the dating stage. They are strictly dinner only.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/20 03:39 AM
0

paying for every single date and only having dinner dates in unrealistic for most men under 30.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/20 03:24 AM
1

You're comparing men's SMP with woman's RMP...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/20 04:19 PM
1

Ah yeah I'm not talking about the married / engaged folks. I'm talking about the guys that are in LTRs that could easily string along STRs / hookups if they wanted, but they don't. I guess it's a difference in perspective more than anything, I personally never wanted the LTR lifestyle.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/20 04:09 AM
1

How old are your coworkers? Most of mine are mid 20's to late 30's. Not a single one of the guys on my team is "pudgy" or overweight, most of us are actually pretty fit. I wouldn't say anyone here is a "natural alpha", but we are all decent looking and successful financially, which translates into more than a few options. Despite everything they have going for them though, they all choose to be in committed relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/20 03:34 AM
2

It's pretty interesting at this level. It's almost as if guys have the upper hand, since nobody really desires women for their money. Any of the guys I work with can walk away from their current partner and have tons of options lined up. Not sure if the women can say the same (at least for LTR material options, hookups is a different story ofc).
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/20 02:54 AM
1

Yup. Everyone I work with makes at least 250K, and most here make 500K+. Everyone is in committed relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/20 12:54 AM
1

As a side note, it seems that this sub really doesn't reflect the struggles of the current day SMV/RMV. I feel like 75%+ people here are already married, engaged, or over 30. Most of the discussions are talking about dynamics in the 18-24 age group of single young adults, which most people here have no personal experience with.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/20 12:50 AM
14

Most socially well adjusted and successful men aren't ardent church goers.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/20 07:41 PM
1

Success means different things to different people This is what I'm saying. For some men, never having any casual sex and then pairing off and marrying in their early 30's is success. But for the vast majority, it is not. That is why when people talk about how the marriage rate "disproves" blackpill theories about the SMV/RMV, I have to disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/20 02:02 AM
1

You said "most men get married" as if that disproves the blackpill. Just because those men got married doesn't mean they were successful in the SMV/RMV.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/20 01:54 AM
0

lol @ thinking marriage equals success for a man. stop listening to what society says men want and start understanding what men actually want.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/20 01:49 AM
1

Men. However, most women are in unhappy relationships, so in the real world, women.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/20 07:27 PM
5

I've been around men like you describe. Even male models that have thousands of followers on instagram, fuck the hottest girls on tinder etc. You are exaggerating if you say their whole reality is different from the average male. In dating/relationships/hooking up, yeah, but in most other things, not really.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/20 08:25 AM
1

If a women is getting tons of validation online, she is more likely to overestimate herself and see herself as much better than she really is. If a man is watching tons of porn, it has the opposite effect; He will more than likely feel really bad about himself and probably only does it because he's not getting sex. Their only similarity is that they are addicting.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/20 02:47 PM
1

Why would I ask her for half her income just because she loves me?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/20 09:16 AM
0

I'm a guy, was just confirming how I see it play out irl. I agree though, that is probably their rationalization.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/20 01:21 AM
0

And that may lead to me thinking he's a good guy and wondering what it would be like if he were single. Best explanation
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/20 08:04 PM
1

I don't feel like guys really need sex. A lot of guys do the whole "abstain from fapping" thing and I don't see why abstaining from sex would really cause any mental / physical damage. This is coming from a guy btw.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/20 10:20 AM
1

yup. biologically, not all men were meant to be laid. in fact, only like the top 10% passed on their genes during primitive times.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/20 06:48 AM
1

LMAO. How does putting your dick in a hole change anything. I think what you mean is intimacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/20 01:38 AM
1

Biologically sex is not a need. Back in more primitive times, human tribes would have one or a few males that would have sex with all of the other woman, and the rest of the men would just provide resources.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/20 01:37 AM
4

Yeah basically. People are interpreting what I'm saying as "Men have no value to society". What I'm really saying is "Women don't need men for relationships".
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/20 06:01 AM
2

Women have sex to offer. Chads have sex to offer. The other 99% of men have their resources to offer. That's all I'm saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/20 05:24 AM
0

99% of men are settled for. Nothing I've said is incorrect.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/20 05:09 AM
6

Yeah that's because the average age of a married couple is like 40. Back then none of the current RMV dynamics applied. Let's see what happens when the current 18-24 yr olds get married. I don't think many women are going to want a man that makes less than them.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/20 04:40 AM
-1

I'm a guy
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/20 04:37 AM
1

Since men don't offer much, woman can be more selective and select for men that make more (and in many cases, much more) than they do. This will obviously create scenario in which the top earning women can't find men easily, and the bottom earning men can't find women easily. Also, just because they can make money themselves doesn't mean they want to. Despite what feminism says, not all women want to work tirelessly 40 hr/week for the rest of their lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/20 04:31 AM
2

You act as if women marrying a man is "tying themselves". Even 1 minute of research would show you that it's actually the man that gets "tied down" and the woman can leave whenever she wants and keep the house, car, kids, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/20 04:20 AM
2

What are you even saying? Obviously men are needed for the government to run. Obviously men are needed for society to function. That's not what I'm arguing. I'm saying that those men don't offer anything to women other than their resources. Are you one of those guys that get rejected by a woman and then retort "If I didn't slave away at my job 40 hours the government would never be able to fund the road you walk on!" and expect that woman to magically want you because of that?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/20 04:06 AM
4

Obviously the economy and other things are upheld by men. But the government gives women the benefits from that for free, so why would they date/fuck/marry a man for that?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/20 04:01 AM
-2

No, because some of them realize that men have nothing to offer except resources so they just decide to go with the man with the most resources.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/20 03:56 AM
3

Sex. Women, even when they have no skills or talents, can at least offer sex to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/20 03:54 AM
3

Never said men are worthless. I'm saying they don't offer much to women (outside of their resources).
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/20 03:52 AM
3

Exactly
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/20 03:51 AM
4

I'm not saying men are worthless. I'm saying they don't offer much to women. I do agree that they offer things to society and society offers things to women, but that's not what I'm arguing.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/20 03:50 AM
1

I'm a guy
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/20 02:46 AM
3

I'm a guy
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/20 02:43 AM
3

what the fuck does this even mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/20 01:47 AM
0

Tell me objectively where I'm wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/20 01:36 AM
2

Read my other comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/20 01:24 AM
3

There's a reason why so few men do well on tinder. Because other than their resources, men don't really offer much other than the top 0.1%
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/20 01:23 AM
3

Sex. Why else do you think that the most common situation in which a woman becomes a prostitute was when they had no other job skills? Because at the end of the day, they still offer sex. Women have an innate gift they are born with, men have nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/20 01:23 AM
1

What's your number for date arrangement purposes Lol'd at this line.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/20 07:28 PM
2

why does engineering or academia matter at all? are you one of those people that can only talk ever about school?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/20 05:19 AM
1

sf wbu?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/20 07:21 AM
1

k
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/20 06:06 AM
1

how are push-up shoes any different from a push-up bra? or makeup? the list goes on...
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/19 02:08 AM
2

The stem job market cannot be unfair towards women because nobody is owed a stem job from a company. period.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/19 01:45 AM
1

This will never happen. There will always be inequality between countries in the same way there is inequality between people.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/19 01:12 AM
42

Yup, this should be way higher. The bottom 20% of men are worse off than the bottom 20% of women, but the top 20% of men are better off than the top 20% of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/19 04:17 AM
6

I guess women just look for a balance that matches their own experience This is becoming increasingly difficult for most men, as the average woman has more sex, access to sex, and sexual attention than the average man.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/19 11:02 PM
7

Two things: OP is indian, doubt he will be considered an "appealing foreginer" Pre tinder days were much easier to get laid than now.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 07:33 AM
0

Agreed
/r/askTRP21/06/19 05:52 AM
0

Because there is no such thing is a man that is both attractive to women and willing to pay and kiss up to a woman. The latter is inherently unattractive to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/19 04:02 AM
3

Chad doesn't have to be a "bad boy". He can be tall hot doctor or a masculine engineer. But he is always attractive.
/r/MGTOW12/05/19 04:47 PM
38

Guys tend to trash apartments more than girls. That is why girls are preferred. Imagine if you said Blacks tend to trash apartments more than whites. That is why whites are preferred. See the sexism in that statement now?
/r/MensRights14/03/19 05:00 PM
6

My goal is to hurt them Side note to anyone reading: don't do this
/r/askTRP11/03/19 12:32 AM
1

Regardless of the wording, a man that can afford that lifestyle who is also good looking / masculine will have many options.
/r/RedPillWomen22/02/19 06:49 AM
1

Don't be fooled by online fairytales, finding a good looking, masculine guy who is also rich enough for that lifestyle is extremely rare. The ones who have all those qualities have hundreds of options. A strategy like that will have a very high chance of ending up in your mid 30s with no man in sight.
/r/RedPillWomen22/02/19 06:40 AM
1

Well you continued the relationship even though he cheated in the beginning. I don't think you can blame rpw for this.
/r/RedPillWomen11/01/19 01:44 AM
1

Blue pill people start averagely happy When they discover truths of red pill they become very sad When they swallow the red pill, maximize self improvement and gain results, they become very happy.
/r/askTRP10/01/19 07:48 PM
-1

No matter what you do to pass this shit test, the fact that she threw this at you probably points to something bigger. I think you should up dread game here.
/r/askTRP25/12/18 10:11 PM
12

Stopped reading after you said you live in a common law state LMAO.
/r/askTRP21/12/18 06:48 PM
3

I'm a guy myself, and I've yet to ever see a true "mgtow/isolated/disillusioned" man myself. Its either guys that get laid or guys that want to get laid.
/r/RedPillWomen21/12/18 01:03 AM
3

Mgtow is like 1% of men. This is kind of irrelevant.
/r/RedPillWomen21/12/18 12:46 AM
1

I lol'd at this
/r/askTRP19/12/18 11:58 AM
2

You dont understand because you made a fatal assumption. You said "even if the guy is perfect". The thing is, the guy that the woman is dating is never perfect. Why? Because just by agreeing to be her boyfriend (aka agreeing to commitment), he automatically devalues himself. Girls like true alphas with tons of options. If a guy is willing to have sex with only her then he must be low value.
/r/MGTOW18/12/18 09:55 PM
4

His strategies apply to younger women as well, just they are for older men (looking for younger women). What you are looking for is a way to game younger women as a younger man. A lot of the time all you can do is lift and game. I think a lot of it is genetics as well when you are younger.
/r/askTRP12/12/18 07:43 AM
1

6-pack
/r/MGTOW07/12/18 02:14 AM
2

TRP men want to use women because they think there are no good women. If a good woman (aka you) shows them otherwise, it might change. Also that is not all TRP men.
/r/RedPillWomen06/12/18 02:22 PM
2

If you dont focus on self improvement, you wont even be able to get sex at age 20. Obviously this doesnt mean have no sex, just dont focus on it.
/r/askTRP03/12/18 08:42 AM
3

Focus on self improvement. All the guys I know that got laid a bunch in high school ended up doing fuck all with their lives afterwards. High school is nothing, the sex is awkward and shitty. Lift and get into a good college program in a sensible major (no art or philosophy or stupid shit like that). This will set you up to have an amazing life with way more legendary moments than in high school.
/r/askTRP02/12/18 09:03 PM
12

No actual advice from me, but the way you talk about $20k like its nothing physically pains me.
/r/askTRP02/12/18 12:09 PM
1

Asians are way shorter than average american.
/r/MGTOW02/12/18 12:33 AM
1

At the small scale, like in local communities, it is most likely genetic. The tallest, most handsome guy in your class, etc. At the large scale, like nationally famous or rich guys, it is mostly behavioral. Look at rappers like Tyga. They are all short and skinny but fuck 9s every other day with absolute zero respect for these hoes whatsoever.
/r/askTRP26/11/18 05:28 AM
-2

You didnt answer the second question...
/r/askTRP02/11/18 12:40 AM
1

How much taller than you is he? Do you lift?
/r/askTRP02/11/18 12:33 AM
1

Honestly dude you seem pretty cool. Like others said, keep the "work hard, play hard" attitude going and your smv will skyrocket long term. As for now probably just say you play sports even if you dont, chicks dont know the difference.
/r/askTRP27/10/18 07:48 PM
1

Top 20% probably. If you want to be top 5% you probably have to become rich or famous.
/r/askTRP27/10/18 06:44 PM
1

Fucking girls is just a biological need at the end of the day. Life isnt about getting your dick wet.
/r/askTRP23/10/18 10:41 PM
14

I don't get what you're saying? You're telling me that it's not a spectrum? There are girls that will leave their long term bf and drop everything as soon as an alpha shows up. Then there are girls who will only just cheat with him. Then there are girls that wouldn't break up with their boyfriend but try to get him to act more alpha, then break up with him down the line once she realize its not going to happen. Then there are girls who do nothing, but they will sometimes fantasize about the alph…
/r/askTRP09/10/18 03:16 PM
20

He's saying that by becoming more alpha, you tend to attract girls that pick based on superficial traits, so you perceive all girls as picking based on superficial traits, when in reality it is a spectrum.
/r/askTRP09/10/18 02:55 PM
6

Transforming is possible even for the ugliest of guys, they just dont know how to do it. I'm used to be an ethnic 5'10 19 year old. I got shoe lifts, got procpecia, started lifting. Everything has changed.
/r/askTRP29/09/18 10:19 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter