TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

wulfilia Archive

View 0 posts and 11 comments by wulfilia on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

You're certainly not the first! [T]hings [...] have been making me question for some time whether many users in TRP are really what they say they are.[...] I have a feeling a lot of the active posters [...] basically say whatever they think will look cool at the time in replying to comments. I think you're absolutely right. I've been on that sub since it started, and I've been banned numerous times for "disrespecting the mods" (yes, really). The whole sub is basically an ego-trip for redpillscho…
/r/MensRights09/03/14 02:56 AM
2

I agree with your comment. Who says the worldwide status quo is the way to go? I suppose, only those who look for authority to professional associations and governments. It would have been fairer not to raise the question of who started doing what first.
/r/MensRights26/02/10 10:10 AM
4

It would be utter folly. The US is about the last Western country to encourage this. Join the 21st century.
/r/MensRights25/02/10 10:14 AM
2

Upvoted for thumbnail.
/r/MensRights01/09/09 10:46 AM
6

The "arguments that sexual offences should not be distinguished from other types of crime" is a forceful one. Sex offences should not as a matter of principle automatically be treated differently from other offences. What exactly is the public benefit in permitting the publication of defendants' identifying details before conviction? Whatever it may be, opposed to it is a very strong public interest in (a) preventing prejudice to the criminal process and (b) upholding the presumption of innocenc…
/r/MensRights26/08/09 05:17 PM
2

Do you seriously assert that the National Enquirer is on the same level as the Daily Mail?
/r/MensRights06/08/09 08:30 AM
2

You're trying to justify your position based on what others think or random statements that have no relevance, you're using intellectual misleading arguments to justify your position, i.e. you're resorting to group think rather than logic because you have come to accept what the group says without question. Ad-Hominem attacks, shouting, weird anecdotes, strawman etc. Please explain what you say my position is? I've hardly said anything about the matter. Show me where I posted any of the followin…
/r/MensRights26/07/09 10:26 AM
6

And routine infant circumcision in the United States isn't the result of groupthink?
/r/MensRights26/07/09 07:42 AM
1

If you feel otherwise, you're simply defending what happened to your own penis. Although I agree with your main point in your first paragraph, this comment is a tiny bit reductionist. There must be some people who falsely believe it to provide a health benefit who are not thinking with their, er ...
/r/MensRights26/07/09 07:37 AM
1

Anyone with some familiarity with the case knows the prosecution hasn't got a hope. And he has Richter on his side ...
/r/MensRights06/07/09 08:25 AM
0

Well said. Somebody had to say it.
/r/MensRights28/06/09 05:27 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter