TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

wwwppp777 Archive

View 6 posts and 119 comments by wwwppp777 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

I chat with taxi/uber drivers all the time and they hands down agree that drunk female passengers are a huge liability as most of them have had stories of driving the woman home and she'll run out of the vehicle without paying once they get to where they're going. Because really, minority man chasing down a scantily clad woman at night? Picking women up as a driver is high risk, low reward.
/r/MensRights24/05/16 02:59 AM
1

The popular vote doesn't determine the winner. The electoral college does.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 01:04 AM
1

I work in the same building as this girl. She works at a makeup design company and the girls are always going out for group smoke breaks, fully in their stage makeup such as star trek characters, bald cap looks, etc. I'm not trying to paint with too broad a brush here, but every time I see girls from her makeup design company on another smoke break, it appears that they're really enjoying the attention they're getting from people walking by gawking at their "crazy" looks. Looks to me like she re…
/r/MensRights03/04/16 01:07 PM
9

There should be a competing hash tag of #I Believe Facts
/r/MensRights24/03/16 09:59 PM
1

The 2% number only counts instances where the girl files a police report, there's a fact finding investigation, it's determined that the girl willfully misrepresented her claims OR it goes into the court system where the long drawn out process ultimately shows a false accusation. Multiple police chiefs state that the actual number of false accusations to be anywhere from 50 to 80 percent, but without that entire official process that I mentioned above, it's not recorded.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/16 07:13 PM
1

Good day to you. I hope you find some peace because you honestly seem incredibly angry, and it colors your arguments and effects your debating skills, which are sadly lacking. And I mean this in the best way possible - it's time to grow up. All the best.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 07:16 PM
1

Neither of us can know whether or not the guy is truly innocent. You can say that about any verdict any time, so it's essentially an empty and meaningless statement in this context. In the case at hand, the facts do seem to suggest that she lied, which was corroborated with other facts presented and inconsistencies on her part which ultimately bear the weight of the ruling. Will anyone ever truly know the accuracy of any case - no. But that's what a properly conducted judicial process is for. Th…
/r/MensRights17/03/16 07:01 PM
1

The fact that the court systems have made incorrect findings doesn't negate the binary notion of "innocent until proven guilty" and your tangential statements of how the innocent have been jailed and the guilty have gone free does nothing to further your statement.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 06:44 PM
1

Yes I know what The Innocence Project is. I worked with them for a number of years. Essentially your argument as best as I can distill it down to is that just because he's found not guilty by a jury, after what appears to be a full and compete investigation involving the reach of due diligence and other fact finding measures, along with the verdict not being JNOV'd, that this man is still not innocent of raping the woman? Of course judicial findings have absolutely been wrong before, but the mos…
/r/MensRights17/03/16 06:42 PM
1

Okay.... which is the judicial system that the civilized world participates in. Essentially your argument as best as I can distill it down to is that just because he's found not guilty by a jury, after what appears to be a full and compete investigation involving the reach of due diligence and other fact finding measures, along with the verdict not being JNOV'd, that this man is still not innocent of raping the woman? Of course judicial findings have absolutely been wrong before, but the most eg…
/r/MensRights17/03/16 06:37 PM
1

Yeah I said "seeming assertion." Innocent until proven guilty is quite binary. So if he's found not guilty, then it logically follows that he must be...
/r/MensRights17/03/16 06:15 PM
2

Wow straight to the ad hominem huh? Yeah I think I know something about the concept seeing as I'm an attorney. So if you understand what "innocent until proven guilty" means, then please reconcile the fact or at least clear up the subtle nuance that a jury found the accused not guilty with your contrary and seeming assertion of his guilt.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 05:56 PM
2

What is your view of the notion of "innocent until proven guilty"?
/r/MensRights17/03/16 04:14 PM
10

Although they aren't official studies, police chiefs from numerous places put the number of false rape accusations anywhere around 50 to 80%. It's incredibly hard to determine the actual number given the loose definitions of rape and the misconstrued reporting methods.
/r/MensRights03/01/16 05:07 PM
3

She cared enough to block me on Twitter for just saying it was shameful to bring mattress girl to the SOTU. That's my senator!
/r/MensRights10/11/15 02:51 AM
1

Can you provide any evidence that it does? Uh you're the one who definitively stated that the inverse sentiment was "wrong on so many levels." I merely asked you to cite that statement.
/r/MensRights06/10/15 08:26 PM
1

How do you now that the 57% figure doesn't include false rape convictions? And even if NONE of those cases were false rapes, that just means that scores of men are being put in jail based on zero to little evidence, which is another huge injustice on its own.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 07:44 PM
2

I think it might be safe to say that she understood you completely and played dumb because she knew she was wrong. I see it happen every time I debate a feminist.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 01:01 AM
5

I think this sub has been abundantly clear that the only thing we want is equality
/r/MensRights18/06/15 06:09 PM
3

Who said anything about forced abortion?
/r/MensRights30/05/15 08:28 PM
3

How would a legal paternal surrender take any rights away from a woman?
/r/MensRights30/05/15 06:01 PM
2

If men were allowed to choose when they became fathers, then children would be born into families with both parents that want him/her. If you really are advocating the unilateral right for women to choose when a man becomes a parent, then you are supporting inequality.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 02:53 PM
3

Give men the option of paternal surrender just like the numerous options women have to reject being a parent until they are ready.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 11:16 AM
2

Arguments against legal paternal surrender are only consistent if that person is also against abortion altogether.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 11:14 AM
4

Yeah Gothamist and /r/nyc both attract a good number of feminists and white knights.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 06:52 PM
14

The are a number of tax breaks and loan exceptions that a company is granted if the company is deemed to be 51 percent woman owned which includes higher SBA loan limits, loan fee waivers, capital gains tax exclusion and a doubling of the start-up expense limitation to $10,000. I work with a number of companies that are run by men, but to save money, they arrange their paperwork to say that one of their female associates "owns" the business, thereby granting them major tax breaks.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 03:41 PM
16

Tax code. If a woman starts a business, it will cost her much less than a man starting his own business.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 02:34 PM
31

She blocked me on twitter for simply posting a link to her feed that showed the text messages between mattress girl and her "rapist" that tends to prove his innocence. Apparently evidence of innocence is offensive to her.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 02:28 PM
2

Okay. I still don't see what that has to do with my point that the economic sanctions and falling price of oil have crashed the Russian economy.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 08:31 PM
1

I'm not trying to start an argument so please don't group me in with people who you consider to want to argue about anything. Responding to your statement however, I didn't say anything about the aim of the sanctions and Russia's potential response. That actually has nothing to do with what I said at all. What I said is that the imposed sanctions along with the price of oil has crashed the Russian economy, which was in response to your assertion that sanctions do not work. We're on the same team…
/r/MensRights29/01/15 08:09 PM
2

Sanctions combined with the plummeting price of oil is crashing the Russian economy as we speak.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 07:48 PM
31

Me too! Let's go raping!
/r/MensRights29/01/15 05:21 PM
3

It's also a way that men typically communicate. We put each other down because if done in a lighthearted way, it's funny. My wife loves hanging out with my buddies because she says it's so much funnier as compared to when we hang out with her friends, who would get ultra sensitive if you put them down, even in a joking way.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 03:32 PM
6

An overlooked fact in these types of situations is that mostly ALL of the people that come to help are men almost exclusively. Sure, the people that generally perpetuate these types of violent crimes are men, however they are widely outnumbered by the amount of men that are coming to do good. It is sad that feminists always focus on the gender of the violent man as opposed to the heroic acts of those that respond and put their lives at risk for others.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 11:02 PM
1

How long ago was this? I'm just asking because he really should pursue legal action if the statute of limitations hasn't passed. I understand him just wanting to get away from the event emotionally, but the girl absolutely needs to realize the extent of her lies.
/r/MensRights07/12/14 02:27 PM
1

We also need to stop going after people that commit insurance fraud because it might prevent people who might otherwise need to file valid insurance claims from ever proceeding.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 10:47 PM
2

Girl Writes What is one of the most important voices for MRA's along with several other female advocates. I understand the appeal of marginalization but saying something like this is divisive in a way that's not helpful.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 10:42 PM
5

The majority of domestic abuse are cases of violence of men on women? Are you aware that domestic violence rates between couples that both reciprocate violence are generally equal among men and women? Further, in relationships when it's just one person committing violence, The solid majority of those involve a violent female and non-reciprocating male. As a tip, I would suggest going over your numbers as they are way off base and also stop blaming problems that we all face on an abstract concept…
/r/MensRights30/03/14 03:02 PM
1

The remaining gap is usually explained by the fact that men generally negotiate more and for more money.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 02:44 PM
1

You have to understand that the ONLY goal for any company is to make money. With this premise, the argument of .77 cents goes up in smoke. There's not one business minded person in the world that would forego saving 23% of their expenses based on something as trivial as gender. People that believe the. 77 myth generally have no grasp on business.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 02:40 PM
–

There's a lot of good ones out there. Not many, but they're out there.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 01:09 AM
2

So if you were thrown in jail for a false rape accusation, you would be fine with that considering your "better safe than sorry" logic?
/r/MensRights15/02/14 05:17 PM
6

Perfectly stated.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 10:11 PM
1

Yeah I never thought of that but it makes a certain amount of sense.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 07:45 PM
3

I think they're must be some evolutionary explanation behind why guys are generally a lot funnier than women. If you ask any woman what she desires in a guy, 'sense of humor' will almost always be somewhere in the top 3. But if you ask a guy what he looks for in a woman, you'll be hard pressed to find a guy that says that he wants a woman that can make him laugh. But of course, it's become offensive to say this since it goes against the idea that women are just as good as men at everything.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 05:35 PM
5

Sorry about your loss. If you can, please get the word out whether it be through your local news outlet, newspaper editorial, community programs, etc. This story needs to be told.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 10:28 PM
0

Again, what difference does it make to the guy behind bars?
/r/MensRights28/01/14 01:18 PM
2

You can go ahead an imply whatever meaning you want to what I said and assert that you know what goes on in my head. I really couldn't care less. How about you ask a man that's been imprisoned for a rape he didn't commit and see if he cares about the difference.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 02:06 AM
2

Here is my source, which sites The Innocence Project as its source. http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/mens-rights-feminism/rapists-proven-innocent-are-majority-57-of-prisoners-released-by-innocence-project You realize that misidentification of a person for rape is also a false rape allegation, right? It is, by definition, false.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 01:37 AM
12

My wife mentioned a story in college about how she and a group of other girls saw their one skanky friend straddling multiple guys at a house party and then go into the bathroom with three of them to suck them all off. The next day my wife was pulled into the campus legal counselor's office and asked by some cops what happened, to which my wife told them about how the girl was a willing participant. Apparently, the skanky friend was embarrassed about her behavior and claimed she was gang raped. …
/r/MensRights27/01/14 10:02 PM
7

Although it's not a direct answer to your question, The Innocence Project states that 57% of the people they were able to exonerate were incarcerated for a false rape claim. But according to some feminists, false rape claims don't exist.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 02:44 PM
1

This is along the lines of what I've been telling all my buddies. Men need to realize the power we have. Either date/marry a woman that is Egalitarian/MRA or go MGTOW. This line of thinking is the single biggest threat to the feminists we see today that treat men as nothing but a wallet. My wife is egalitarian/MRA and she treats me like a king and thanks me every day for working the hours I do to support our family. People tell us all the time that we're the happiest couple they know. Coincidenc…
/r/MensRights24/12/13 12:55 PM
5

Please go through the rights that are given to you as a male that the government gives you that they do not afford women, based entirely upon your gender. Then please go through the obligations that women are forced upon by the government that men are not, based entirely upon gender. Because I can give you a long list of the opposite.
/r/MensRights20/11/13 09:12 PM
1

My point is that you seem to be making the love of your wife an opposite and opposing notion of men protecting themselves. I'm saying that there does not have to be a binary distinction between the two concepts, hence why I prefaced what I said earlier by describing how much I love my wife.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 06:17 PM
4

I just wanted to say that I am incredibly in love with my wife and could not imagine life without her. That said, I think you missed the point of the post, which is for men to weigh the costs of marriage seriously as the law is completely stacked against them. I give the same advice to my buddies, not in a display of disrespect to my wife, but rather a caution to my friends.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 10:33 PM
5

Were there any other factors whatsoever? For example, if the man had been there for a certain period of time, he may have gotten a raise during the course of his employment whereas your friend was just starting off with a beginning salary.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 11:46 AM
18

Have any men here ever worked a job where you were paid more than the females at that job based solely on your gender? Or have any of the women here experienced being paid less than the men at a job due to nothing else but gender?
/r/MensRights24/10/13 10:14 PM
3

And in your belief that men and women should fulfill certain gender roles, does this include the belief that men should put women and children first in these types of scenarios?
/r/MensRights18/10/13 11:10 PM
1

If the woman was so career minded, then two incomes would probably cover those expenses. I'm just saying that if a career is such a focus, then the presence of children wouldn't deter that person.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 01:52 PM
1

Who said that the woman has to stop working? If a career is what she wants, then go to work. If you have kids, but still want to further yourself professionally, then go to work and put the kids in daycare, or have a parent watch them, or a babysitter. My mother took two weeks off after having my sister and me, and then went back to work. Staying at home with the kids is a privilege. Someone shouldn't be able to say that they gave up their career to raise kids when they never wanted a career to …
/r/MensRights09/09/13 11:36 PM
64

I would normally suggest a boycott of Moby's music but unfortunately he hasn't been relevant in at least a decade.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 01:22 AM
1

No... Actually I've been trying to get you to answer the same question for days now but it's clear to me now that you have no answer and instead just have quips and platitudes. Good day to you.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 12:50 AM
1

Are you going to keep addressing headlines and ignoring the issue of substance?
/r/MensRights16/08/13 01:18 AM
1

You continuously avoid answering my question regarding substantive use and sensational use of the phrase "women and children."
/r/MensRights16/08/13 01:12 AM
1

And when they're used substantively?
/r/MensRights15/08/13 02:03 AM
3

Is there a point you'd like to make?
/r/MensRights14/08/13 09:03 PM
2

Regardless of the intent of the writer, there is a sexist and discriminatory effect. Applying your logic would invalidate every feminist claim of a comedian being sexist as their intent is to invoke humor over propagating sexism.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 12:26 PM
2

So basically you're ignoring my point? You know, about the whole practice of using this type of phrasing substantively?
/r/MensRights14/08/13 01:21 AM
2

The practice isn't confined to headlines. This type of phrasing is found substantively to describe acts of terror and war consistently. Search for articles related to acts of violence that use the qualifier "women and children" and I'm pretty sure you'll find quite a bit more usage of that phrasing than you'll see of "men and children."
/r/MensRights14/08/13 01:08 AM
1

Headlines that mention a total count of people killed followed by a further and more specific number of women killed infers that the death of a woman is more tragic and significant than the death of a man. This really isn't that complicated.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 12:53 AM
3

You mean a mythical wage gap compared to an actual case of discrimination?
/r/MensRights02/08/13 12:21 PM
1

I can empathize with women who see inequality in certain aspects of life due to the fact that they're female, and if the inequality truly is unjust, then I would fight for their cause, much like I'd imagine the majority of MRA's to. However, when there are obvious injustices levied upon men, the majority of women seem adamant on denying, ridiculing, and dismissing the very notion. It's almost as if they want a monopoly on gender related problems.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 07:25 PM
5

while at the same time, women make up 51-52% of the voting population, so if that's their argument, they have no one to blame but themselves.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 07:16 PM
5

That's a good point. Although I'm slightly nervous about it considering that HR is all female. Not to say that they wouldn't be fair as they haven't ever given me a reason to think that. Maybe I'm just being paranoid.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 01:27 PM
12

They took a video down a couple months back that caught a women screaming a fake rape allegation for the same reasons. Apparently, according to Youtube, anything that might show women being violent or acting in a way that is the traditional perfect and infallible female stereotype falls under the category of "harrassment, bulying, and threatening."
/r/MensRights22/07/13 10:53 PM
3

Kinda sounds like your ex-wife just wants to be able to just "hang out" or go out on the weekends while she get the kids on typical workdays.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 06:45 PM
3

Don't you have anything better to do with your time than to constantly troll this sub?
/r/MensRights09/07/13 11:30 PM
1

Sen. Claire McCaskill. I wrote her a letter yesterday on her ignorance. http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/06/27/there-is-no-war-on-men-claire-mccaskill-replies-to-james-taranto.html
/r/MensRights28/06/13 11:48 PM
3

I will gladly support you as I feel the same frustration as you regarding my larger political beliefs and how that aligns me with the president but how he continually speaks down to men. However, if you were to get behind a man's right to opt out of parenthood, mandatory DNA testing at the birth of a child, default joint custody as a baseline in custody hearings, and punishment for false rape accusers, you would be my dream candidate. I will donate to your campaign now and wish you the best of l…
/r/MensRights03/10/12 02:12 PM
1

Thank you for your reply. I understand where you are coming from regarding the difference from a physical standpoint, but I am not implying that a man should be able to control a woman's choice contrary to what the law already allows. Wouldn't a fair and equitable solution allow for a man to opt out of parenthood up until the point Roe v. Wade allows a woman to choose, i.e. the point of viability. If the law allowed for the man to opt out of parenthood, then it would bring into perspective the p…
/r/MensRights03/10/12 07:08 AM
4

Will you advocate for the right of a male to opt out of parenthood? Essentially, what it comes down to is whether you believe that a man should have the same choice as a woman to not become a parent?
/r/MensRights02/10/12 06:39 PM
13

That's like saying that we shouldn't prosecute someone that yells fire in a crowded theater just in case it actually happens one day and we want to avoid someone being too scared to announce it.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 03:18 PM
280

She spoke at my old law school a couple years back and when it was time for the Q&A, the girl next to me asked the obligatory feminist question of, "Do you feel as if your career has been more difficult because you're a WOMAN"??? I was expecting Judge Judy to give the typical response of how much harder it is out there for women and how they face all these forms of discrimination that men don't have to put up with, but instead she responds with, "No, absolutely not" and moved on. Respect.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 09:47 PM
8

I enjoy treating everyone equally
/r/MensRights12/09/12 01:37 AM
9

Actually, he "tripped" onto a safety boat and got his ass out of there. http://m.yahoo.com/w/legobpengine/news/cruise-captain-says-tripped-lifeboat-couldnt-153914621--abc-news.html?orig_host_hdr=news.yahoo.com&.intl=US&.lang=en-US
/r/MensRights12/09/12 12:36 AM
2

*acting out , not actingboit
/r/MensRights11/09/12 08:02 PM
24

Do the same exact thing to her. That's how I respond to females actingboit in a way that assumes their female privilege. A female friend punched me in the face once because I was trying to keep her away from my buddy that she wanted to bang, even though he didn't want it from her. I punched her right back in the face and made her apologize to me the next morning when she sobered up. I treat females with the equality they say they want. By doing nothing, you make your friend's behavior acceptable…
/r/MensRights11/09/12 08:01 PM
6

Look I appreciate your willingness to see legitimacy in our cause, but a statement like that suggests that you are just looking for a group of people who will agree with and compliment you. You said it yourself, r/feminism is becoming less of what you can identify with because of their hateful rhetoric. Then why would you go back there? Because the people there will appreciate and agree with you?
/r/MensRights05/09/12 07:46 PM
2

A man who is less attractive than his wife is not evidence of objectification.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 07:40 PM
2

If a father wanted to bring his child on the convention floor, he wouldn't be allowed to do so either, so tell me how this is discrimination against women again.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 02:56 PM
1

Yeah but just because you can link a discriminatory practice to a valid business decision doesn't mean it's justified. If there was a restaurant that showed that their business increased overall because they banned blacks, they still couldn't get away with it.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 05:11 PM
6

Clubs are more violent with too many blacks too. Lets charge them more!
/r/MensRights29/04/12 12:20 PM
1

This is in New Jersey.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 12:16 PM
2

Logged in just to tell you that you rock. Most females I know would be influenced by what their friends say in this instance. My wife and I are in a similar situation as you and your boyfriend, as she is the bread-winner and I am looking for work. I love cleaning the house while she is gone, walking the dog, cooking meals for her, etc., but I know her brother looks down on me. It's just nice to know that there are people out there like you.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 12:15 PM
1

No, my argument is valid because it would virtually end paternity fraud. And speaking as an attorney, I am aware of most family matter laws and how in a lot of states, a man cannot "just ask" for a paternity test. In New York, a man cannot have a paternity test until his wife gives her consent. In most other states, ANY child born while the couple is married is deemed the husband's child and he is therefore financially responsible for him/her without any protections under the law. And what in my…
/r/MensRights23/04/12 02:09 PM
1

My point is that in this particular context, there are two victims - the man and the child, and one in the wrong - the woman. I was pointing out how you turned your judgment towards one of the victims per se without knowledge of anyone else's circumstance instead of the one and only person who deserving of it. I'm pointing this out because it obviously went over your head.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 02:06 PM
1

So we should continue to allow men to be victimized by their cheating wives?
/r/MensRights13/04/12 05:02 PM
1

Funny how your comment places judgment on the man who walks out on kids that aren't even his and his cheating wife by calling them pieces of shit, rather than focusing your efforts on calling the wife a piece.of.shit.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 05:00 PM
12

Men in New York also need their wife's permission to get a paternity test. And even if it's discovered later that he's not the father, he'll still be on the hook for the kid. Yep, it's a man's world indeed.
/r/MensRights02/06/11 12:58 PM
2

Oh shit, sorry man! Yeah, I was actually excited when Casey won because I couldn't stand Santorum, but it really is a game of the lesser of two evils.
/r/MensRights12/05/11 07:47 PM
1

Yeah it's a pretty bad double standard. Men are forced to wear pants to work and if he chooses to wear shorts, he'll most likely be fired or disciplined. If a woman was fired or disciplined for not wearing a skirt, there'd be a huge sexual discrimination lawsuit.
/r/MensRights12/05/11 03:06 PM
1

There's some nuance in the difference though. The image the OP is referring to is specifically making a division between men and women, and the OP was talking about how it's disgusting how violence against men by women is acceptable. Your image makes no distinction about how men should handle women, but rather "life." Secondly, the "killer" in your image is not being celebrated, as opposed to the OP's image/response.
/r/MensRights11/05/11 07:48 PM
1

I absolutely agree. Having a vagina in no way inhibits a woman's ability to pull a trigger on a gun.
/r/MensRights06/05/11 04:06 PM
2

I think part of the problem is that you consider men to be so much different from women. Your friend doesn't want to adopt, probably b/c she would rather have "her own" baby, that is genetically a part of who she is. Why would it be so different and apparently difficult for you and her to understand the same exact perspective coming from her husband? Is it simply b/c he's a man? I'm not trying to be antagonistic or anything, and I really respect your act of reaching out to understand the situati…
/r/MensRights17/02/11 12:43 PM
2

Funny when you see a thread just a couple links above this one about how a 19 year old guy received 3 years for having consensual sex with his 16 year old girlfriend. It's a sick world we live in when discrimination like this is just accepted.
/r/MensRights01/02/11 04:33 PM
2

Do you think if the law were changed, more women would sign up?
/r/MensRights17/12/10 12:07 AM
2

According to the rules of professional responsibility, I'm not allowed to give you any substantive legal advice because we don't have a true lawyer/client relationship, but most attorneys give you a free first consultation to access whether you have a legitimate case or not. It's all about protecting your job security, so make sure not to act until you have enough to cover yourself. Good luck to you!
/r/MensRights21/07/10 09:19 PM
4

Dude, you need to whistle-blow that shit! And if they fire you, you have a very good case on your side. Just make sure that before you act, you get some sort of evidence from the HR person on why she is making you take part in what is called fraudulent concealment. Email correspondence is fine, although my guess is that the HR rep might not be as forthcoming in that sort of medium. So what you could do is report the matter up, get a record of that meeting, and any subsequent correspondence. Esse…
/r/MensRights21/07/10 03:19 PM
4

Seriously. I was expecting some story about how they started a relationship, began dating, and ended up having sex, etc. Instead, she bangs him upon meeting him for the first time. Damn skanks.
/r/MensRights21/07/10 03:09 PM
1

you got it. i trust you.
/r/MensRights11/07/10 03:38 PM
2

nice. but my point was that the specific MTV penis/bullet ad targets men exclusively which lead me to start talking about their double standards in programming and advertising. I didn't say that there were never any ads made in the inverse. hell, i don't even know for sure that the bullet ad is about STD's.
/r/MensRights11/07/10 12:40 PM
5

yeah but females carry STD's as well. so in the sake of fairness, if the message of the ad is what you say it is, then there should be an accompanying picture of a vagina made to look like a bomb.
/r/MensRights11/07/10 01:13 AM
3

I think that's how it is in New York too. You need a court order or consent of the mother. The law is extremely anti-male in almost every possible way. Paternity tests, alimony, child support, sexual harassment, rape, workplace discrimination, equal protection, parental rights upon a divorce, domestic violence, etc. Yet women (along with manginas) continually see themselves as victims of male domination. I have absolutely no idea how they maintain that utter fallacy to the point of absolute cert…
/r/MensRights10/07/10 12:27 PM
34

I wrote them a letter a little while ago regarding the complete double standard in their programming. My fiancee watches all their shows and I saw a part of the popular Jersey Shore show, when the girl got punched in the face. MTV didn't even show the punch b/c they figured it was too graphic, and after the episode, there was a special message saying something to the effect of, "violence against women is a crime." The part that really pissed me off was that the following commercial was for anoth…
/r/MensRights09/07/10 11:21 PM
-1

Okay so you think that the EPC "ought" to be applied only to the federal government and not private industry. Great, but generations of case and statutory law say otherwise. The fact that even the most conservative judges I've met and worked alongside have never even close to advocated a textualist reading of the EPC or ICC shows how purely principled thinking has no place in reality.
/r/MensRights12/06/10 10:55 PM
1

As a lawyer who has studied the US Constitution for longer than I can remember, I can say that you're wrong about the 14th amendment's application. Amendment 14, section 5 makes it so that its application along with the EPC and the first 10 Amendments apply to the states and private industry. This is usually attached via the Commerce Clause. So for example, if there was a diner off the side of an interstate highway that discriminated against blacks, then that private diner could be regulated thr…
/r/MensRights12/06/10 10:04 PM
2

Equal protection clause, 14th amendment.
/r/MensRights12/06/10 01:00 AM
5

I work at the District Attorney's office in New York. On days I go to court in January, I wear the same thing I wear on the days I go to court in July. The women however, are able to wear shirts with no sleeves, skirts when it's hot, etc.
/r/MensRights08/06/10 10:13 PM
6

hey I love boobs just as much as the next guy. I just don't want to be swimming in my own sweat when I get caught staring.
/r/MensRights08/06/10 07:43 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter