TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

wyrn Archive

View 5 posts and 87 comments by wyrn on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Also, Laci raped me.
/r/MensRights15/04/16 06:13 AM
1

Nope, can't say I do.
/r/MensRights15/04/16 06:00 AM
1

That's debatable because that's implying that feminism actively persecutes men (not just the misandrists). Feminism is very hard to disentangle from the misandry in its midst. The literature is filled with anti male discourse and while there are refreshing exceptions such as the lovely Christina Hoff Sommers, by and large, feminism is anti male. I believe that the MRM arose not out of a need to combat feminism, but to provide for men what feminism claimed to do but will never do, since it's too …
/r/MensRights18/11/14 06:22 PM
1

It should, but men are the primary victims of feminism. Its narrative and its power has to be challenged. Still, that makes it only "tangentially" related.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 06:39 AM
2

Unlike other posters I think this is tangentially connected to Men's Rights. Not that the man himself is in any way connected with the MRM (he isn't, and he sounds like an asshole) but because feminists are flexing their free speech suppressing muscles once again. Say anything deemed ideologically uncomfortable? Off the side of the boat with you. It's pretty sickening.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 12:49 AM
11

Speaking of which https://images.encyclopediadramatica.es/c/c4/Gamergateshit3.jpg
/r/MensRights23/09/14 11:08 PM
4

Well then fair enough. I might add however that if you're afraid of repercussions a throwaway FB account is always an option.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 07:30 PM
8

I don't recommend you delete your posts, OP. The people you're arguing with will never change their minds. That is not the purpose and it has never been. You're out to get the silent ones, those that are just quietly reading the conversation and will make up their minds based on who they thought presented the best case. So present the best case you can, then move on.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 07:21 PM
1

I would expect the rates for men and women to both go down equally Correct, but the underlying signal could have a gender asymmetry anyway. It's like trying to measure the volume of a glass of water by pouring it on a swimming pool and measuring by how much the water rose. Experimental error swamps the original signal. In the CDC's case they have a pitiful confidence interval, about 30%. Using the 2010 numbers, the uncertainty in the number of rapes is of the order of 800,000, which is almost ce…
/r/MensRights18/09/14 06:01 PM
2

I'm guessing that the "biological reasons" hinted at are that men are just that much more rapey.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 05:05 AM
13

"If that’s the case, it is just as misleading to equate a woman’s experience of alcohol-addled sex with the experience of a rape victim who is either physically overpowered or attacked when genuinely incapacitated. For purely biological reasons, there is little doubt that adult victims of such crimes are mostly female" And we know that's true because there's no evidence for it.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 02:46 AM
1

"Because immediately we try to highlight this appalling problem we are then hit with the WATM (What About The Men?) excuse by real misogynists, the type who call female feminists feminazis." I'm sorry, but someone who dismisses legitimate male concerns as misogyny cannot be said to have written anything "mostly great". From that bit I can have an idea of what her opinion of this subreddit would be.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 01:38 AM
2

easily explains away the lifetime gap. That is definitely true to some extent. The way I see it, however, both competing explanations can coexist to an unclear extent. That is why I generally disregard the lifetime statistics as unreliable, because... they are. They are skewed by numerous effects of unknown magnitude. The idea that 20% of male victims are raped by men requires gay men to be disproportionately rapey I agree completely, and I thank you for pointing this out. It's an excellent ideo…
/r/MensRights11/09/14 07:48 AM
1

The point is that it's very hard to know. Imagine you have two drops of water of unequal sizes. Now put each in a bucket containing a liter of water. You measure the total volume using a ruler and some geometry. Naturally your ruler can only measure up to half a millimeter or so, which means your experimental error is something around 30 milliliters (a fluid ounce, for the metrically challenged). The measurement error completely swamps the original signal and you erroneously conclude that becaus…
/r/MensRights11/09/14 06:55 AM
3

The reason I tend to find the CDC numbers inflated is something that can be seen most clearly from the annual rates. According to the 2010 report, we had 1,267,000 male victims of rape and 1,270,000 female victims of rape. That's 2,537,000 victims total. In a country with 318,713,000 people, we're looking at about 796 rapes per 100,000, which is almost 8 times the reported rate in South Africa (116/100,000), one of the rapiest regions in the planet! Using the revised statistics*, the number jump…
/r/MensRights11/09/14 01:07 AM
2

Actually, thanks for clarifying. I was in doubt before reading this because both interpretations seemed equally likely.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 11:21 PM
1

They can take further action preventing MRAs from editing anything, as a whole. And how exactly would they do that? With the built-in bluetooth MRA detector that comes stock with the newest retina display macbooks?
/r/MensRights10/09/14 08:05 PM
3

Yes, there is. Which we can read without violation to the boycott because Wikipedia is not ad-supported. Politely clicking the little "x" button when they show Jimbo Wales' cute little puppy dog eyes asking for donations, though, is completely fair game. And so is refraining from editing Wikipedia or correcting it in any way whatsoever. Until it fixes it structural issues (namely the terrifying "verifiability, not truth" policy), it can burn as far as I'm concerned.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 08:01 PM
1

Circumcision is considered a medical procedure. No. It's an elective procedure. It's a medical procedure when it is done for medical therapeutic reasons, which it never is. We're talking cultural and religious reasons. There is plenty of scientific information that justifies the use of the term male genital mutilation, your abject contempt for the male gender notwithstanding.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 07:54 PM
2

The thing about Wikipedia is that one of its fundamental tenets is "verifiability, not truth". The contrapositive of which is that because of people like you who think that this is a good idea Wikipedia is full of false information parroted from self proclaimed "authoritative" ideologues. Have fun being unreliable, the rest of us will just happily click on the little "X" when your little banner shows up pestering us for donations. You have a quite lucrative Wikimedia foundation there, use it. We…
/r/MensRights10/09/14 06:56 PM
1

I've been saying something like this for quite some time based on nothing but logic. It's very good to see at least a few examples where that's been actually happening.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 06:36 PM
2

It's easy when the standards for establishing rape and sexual assault are so low.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 08:34 PM
14

So whenever I want to push some agenda, all I have to do is speak it in an attempted funny tone and it's all forgiven? Like when Louis C. K. said that men are the worst threat to women's safety? Comedy CAN and SHOULD be taken seriously when the "joke" is just a bigoted lie.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 07:36 PM
2

I'm not disagreeing with your original point, I'm adding a different dimension to it. If offspring were the point of every relationship, homosexuality would have to be disallowed as well. The legal sanctions only make sense in a hypothetical planet where reliable birth control doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 05:48 PM
2

If offspring were an argument against sexual relationships, surely homosexuality would be illegal? This to me sounds like one of those relic laws like you're not allowed to tie your mule to an empty packet of chips on a Sunday and it's pretty appalling that people are actually being prosecuted for it.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 04:10 AM
3

So a consensual sexual relationship between two consenting adults is a crime? Funny how I don't see any SJW outrage over this.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 02:08 AM
4

Why exactly should it be illegal? I'm assuming that the OP is hiring for the private sector. They have the prerogative of turning away candidates that they don't feel meet adequate ethical standards for working at their company. He didn't discriminate her based on race, gender, or sexual orientation; his decision was based solely on her previous job experience. The government has way too much power already. Stop trying to give them more.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 02:05 AM
3

It's funny because when they use that argument they usually cite as examples things like business and engineering for "male" careers and nursing and social work as "female" careers. Surely patriarchy is the reason why business and engineering are financially valuable occupations, right?
/r/MensRights05/09/14 06:34 AM
1

I want to punch that billboard in the face.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 07:58 PM
0

A response to what? The information is now publicly available. It's an integer that people have been sharing around. It's not a window. I bet you're the kind of person who calls piracy "theft". Sorry, but information requires a new paradigm; you can't just repurpose old words and concepts appropriate for the concrete world and assume that they fit nicely. They don't.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 07:42 PM
0

I don't think you know how information works.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 11:22 PM
1

It's not "a" celebrity. It's over a hundred (allegedly). Even restricting our attention to the pictures that were released, it's still a whole hell of a lot.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 08:40 PM
0

Nobody's peeking through anybody's window, except for the hackers. The images are now publicly available. How is it a violation?
/r/MensRights02/09/14 08:39 PM
0

To be fair, I don't. She's pretty pathetic. The problem is that people listen to her and take her seriously, somehow thinking she's a "moderate" feminist when she's really just as rabid as the rest.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 12:01 AM
0

Do tell.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 11:59 PM
0

I love how people downvoted you for correctly pointing out the Streisand effect.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 09:26 PM
1

If it were a photoshop, 4chan would've found out by now. The photos are legit. I think it's inconceivable that this could be a PR stunt. There are way too many celebrities involved in this -- JLaw is just the most famous. A glaring security flaw in iCloud, however, is very conceivable.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 09:26 PM
-1

This is not about the hacker. I'm not blaming men Yes, you are: If the photos were taken or shared without the individual's consent, then it's a violation of privacy. If looking at the pictures is a violation of privacy, you're blaming men for looking at them. You really love straw men, don't you? Says the person leaving a ton of comments in this post thinking that it's about the hacker. My point is and always has been about the viewers. It's in the thread title, for fuck's sake.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 09:18 PM
2

That applies for the hacker, not for the viewers. The focus of this post is on the viewers and how Laci Green took advantage of the situation to demonize men. Note that she puts in a very nice addendum with "we do not exist for other people's sexual pleasure without our consent". Do you agree with that sentence?
/r/MensRights01/09/14 09:16 PM
-2

How exactly is looking at the pictures a violation of privacy? The pictures are out. They're public now. The privacy cherry was popped when the hacker stole the pictures. Blaming men for wanting to see them is just a blatant vilification of male sexuality.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 09:13 PM
0

You do realize that you're arguing for the "male gaze" to be considered a sexual violation, right?
/r/MensRights01/09/14 09:09 PM
0

Thanks for disagreeing in a way that makes sense rather than missing the point entirely like most other people here.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 09:04 PM
0

Thanks for getting it. Most people here keep focusing on how how the hacker is wrong and evil and drinks mojitos made with children's tears but this focus of this post was always meant to be on the viewers rather than the uploader.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 07:58 PM
-2

Do you think that masturbating to pictures of people is a violation?
/r/MensRights01/09/14 07:49 PM
0

"we do not exist for other people's sexual pleasure without our consent." Please explain how that sentence magically excludes masturbation.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 07:31 PM
-1

"No it doesn't Yes, it does. "and you're making a strawman" No, I am not. "She never mentioned, nor does anything she said logically suggest that masturbation to pictures is rape" Yes, she did. "we do not exist for other people's sexual pleasure without our consent." That includes masturbation. If you see a hot girl on the street, go home and masturbate, Laci Green thinks you raped her because you derived sexual pleasure from her without her consent. "She's saying that taking pictures of a nude …
/r/MensRights01/09/14 07:30 PM
-5

Includes, by extension, any man who masturbates to any woman without her express consent. That's it folks, we're all rapists now.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 10:52 AM
9

TRP is not as bad as most people paint it, it's just easier to criticize because those guys don't mince words. Regardless, I agree it's bad PR. We could go back to the source on this one and say "left Plato's cave" instead of "taken the red pill. Unfortunately the vast majority of people have heard of The Matrix while very few know the allegory it's based on.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 11:19 PM
10

They're so confident in their coding competence that they're posing in underwear.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 10:21 PM
1

Perhaps because that would make too much sense. Shit, most academics can't even investigate how to turn on a projector.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 12:53 AM
1

Say again how feminism is about empowering women?
/r/MensRights29/08/14 07:53 AM
6

That's only because you're a normal human being though.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 07:46 AM
3

Apparently Laci Green thinks that's super sexy. www.youtube.com/watch?v=TD2EooMhqRI
/r/MensRights29/08/14 07:46 AM
6

Sorry to hear, guys. I hope you get an opportunity to leave ASAP. Having a sexual life just became incredibly risky.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 07:38 AM
2

Hell, if you want proof, I got it. http://imgur.com/6nE9CwY There we go.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 07:32 AM
5

"Just search my post history" How do you think I reached my conclusion in the first place?
/r/MensRights29/08/14 07:22 AM
3

I'm pretty sure you're a feminist plant. Nice try though. Edited for proof: http://imgur.com/6nE9CwY Typical concern troll.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 06:31 AM
2

I like this bit: "SEN. CLAIRE MCCASKILL, D-Mo.: The more startling statistic is that 40 percent of the college campuses in the country have not investigated a single case of sexual assault in five years. And we know that this is a silent epidemic on our college campuses." It's so silent that we don't even know it's there. Shit, everybody run to the hills.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 05:10 AM
14

California joins Sweden in the elevated status of place I won't set foot in, ever. Congratulations, California.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 04:45 AM
1

If you look carefully you'll see a few darker skinned women and a few blondes. Ethnicity in Brazil is more of a continuum than the clear distinction you get in America but that doesn't mean that racial tensions aren't present at all.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 06:07 PM
5

Feminist 1: Here, look how misogynistic society is! The male rape victims aren't getting victim blamed like women ALWAYS are! Feminist 2: Btw did you hear that men actually enjoy rape? Feminist 1: Fo sho man!
/r/MensRights28/08/14 09:08 AM
1

"Brazilian women, so no racism" Why not?
/r/MensRights28/08/14 05:31 AM
2

I'm Brazilian. I vaguely recall seeing something about this (or something similar) in the news once. I don't think it's implausible.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 05:30 AM
3

I have only recently joined here but what triggered (heh) my initial opposition to feminism was a related experience. Initially I just thought that feminists were ineffectual eccentrics that doth complained too much. At some point I got in a long distance relationship with an extremely abusive girl. Psychological abuse was routine: my ex would break up with me about once a week, with copious amounts of verbal abuse. She'd usually apologize the next day but sometimes it would take longer (god kno…
/r/MensRights28/08/14 05:27 AM
3

Ronnie James Dio's "Don't talk to strangers" seems to be about a sexually frustrated man who's tired of being expected to take all the risks in the pursuit of a relationship. It's rather tenuous and I'm not even sure if my interpretation is correct, so you think I'm full of crap, please say so.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 03:17 AM
2

Begins? It's been going on for years.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 03:07 AM
2

I believe that yes, feminism will be defeated. Feminism is, in some ways, inherently flawed. Its doublespeak permits it to exist at a sort of low level of general awareness: most normal people heard somewhere that feminists are "about equality" and believe that. Some might think that's a good thing but not care enough to join personally, or they might think that they're just a little bit eccentric and unnecessary. The problem (for them) is that feminism is LOUD, and it's only getting louder. And…
/r/MensRights28/08/14 02:56 AM
1

LOL Microsoft ad. Not that they give a shit about this rape hysteria, but they certainly care about selling them xbones.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 02:49 AM
2

Even when it comes to things that most sane people couldn't possibly disagree with, like that segment on nuclear weapons, his points are kind of silly and poorly researched. Nobody in their right mind would argue for less strict control over nukes, but to complain about the fact that one of the computers in the installation used floppy discs was just silly. It's what it was tested with, and it's what we know works. If it ain't broke, don't fix it -- the alternative is to continue having an activ…
/r/MensRights27/08/14 04:45 AM
1

Reddit's game theory just works that way. Popular opinions get upvoted while dissenting, unpopular or otherwise different opinions get downvoted to oblivion. Regardless of the system's original intent, that's how it's used, and the net result is that you get a staggering amount of groupthink. Opinions not deemed kosher by the majority just sink to the bottom; sink enough and you start losing posting rights. Reddit trains its users to the point where speaking the opinions of the hivemind is a qui…
/r/MensRights27/08/14 12:52 AM
1

I wouldn't exactly call myself a communist but someone giving a cursory glance to my political beliefs might say that. I believe that an ideal society has to plan its economy to a much greater degree than modern capitalist societies, including wealth redistribution and communally owned production. In that sense, I am a communist, although I strongly disagree with much of the Marxist ideology that resulted in historical socialism. I'm interested in developing an ideal society according to honest …
/r/MensRights26/08/14 08:38 PM
1

I could be very well be called a communist myself. Your accusation is meaningless: my opposition to the democrat agenda espoused by Oliver is that it's too right wing.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 06:19 PM
1

I think that as usual a useful thing to do is to reverse genders. If females were genitally mutilated (type Ia, to keep it directly comparable) a few weeks after birth, would people still oppose it? A: You betcha.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 06:16 PM
0

That's like saying that sticking your hand in nuclear reactor water is safer than swimming in it. Technically true, but a pretty meaningless distinction to make.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 06:13 PM
2

I mean, before this scandal. There was a thing where he was whining about being harassed and so wasn't going to make Fez 2.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 07:22 AM
2

Again? Didn't he give up like 3 weeks ago?
/r/MensRights26/08/14 06:04 AM
1

I know the uploader. He is aware that it's rape, but he put the question mark there in an attempt to avoid flagging issues. It's rather tenuous but whatever.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 05:59 AM
1

Are you suggesting that I make a link description that's two paragraphs long, or should I post it in text format with a link inside? As far as the show itself, I don't really know. This instance was pointed out to me by a friend.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 05:49 AM
-4

I'm talking about when he brought 97 scientists to "debate" 3 global warming deniers to have a "fair" debate, as in, representative of the scientific consensus. The trouble is: the 97%-of-scientists-agree-with-global-warming thing is being manipulated for effect in pretty much the same way that the wage gap is here. 97% of scientists agreed to the following two assertions: Mean temperatures on the Earth have risen in the past 200 years. Human activity was a significant factor in this rise. It do…
/r/MensRights26/08/14 05:18 AM
3

The point is that with all the flak that Game of Thrones caught for its depictions of rape, one would naively think that this series would be similarly lambasted. Another point is that with all the talk about rape culture and how rapists are portrayed sympathetically by the media, a clear example of a fictional female rapist being portrayed in a sympathetic light is something worth noting. In the context of the show, I don't care, and I'm not one to look for easy watching politically correct ent…
/r/MensRights26/08/14 05:07 AM
2

How is it misleading?
/r/MensRights26/08/14 04:57 AM
1

How exactly is it "safe" to remove a healthy organ? Even a successful circumcision is still violence and unsafe by definition. ps: 117 deaths per year is typical... for mass shootings. Feminists complaining about Elliot Rodgers, take note.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 04:28 AM
12

" Female game developer Zoë Quinn, for example, faced waves of harassment and abuse simply because she submitted a game to a popular distribution service." Haha. HAHA. HAHAHAHHAHA. ... hah. That's it everybody. We must all apologize to Zoe Quinn, whose only crime was to submit a game to steam. Forget all the nepotism and using sex as a promotion and censorship tool. Forget the pussy funded mafia in the games press, that's all part of patriarchy.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 04:14 AM
4

Obama was precise when reporting that particular fact but he was also trying to talk about "equal pay for equal work". Politics as usual.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 04:09 AM
0

To be fair, the vast majority of his segments are shit. Poorly researched material, transparent agenda, biased viewpoints, and very unfunny jokes. He probably thinks that being English implies that he must use an English style of comedy but he can't quite pull it off.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 03:42 AM
-6

John Oliver is an idiot, so no surprise there. He's interested in pushing forth a right wing Democrat agenda, and that includes feminism. See e.g. his comments on global warming or the death penalty. It's pretty simple.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 03:20 AM
2

As an uncircumcised male I can tell you the foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis. This is backed up by substantial research (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17378847, http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/taylor/ ). Other functions include protection (http://www.cirp.org/library/complications/money/, http://www.noharmm.org/bju.htm ), reducing friction in the sexual act (http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/ohara/ ), immunological protection and many more, some probably undiscovered. …
/r/MensRights26/08/14 03:09 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter