TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

x30Jx Archive

View 3 posts and 186 comments by x30Jx on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

So could OP be forced to provide child support if the kid turns out to be his, with absolutely zero involvement in the kids life or hers, except for a relationship two years in the past, and not be awarded any parental rights?
/r/MensRights21/04/14 05:36 PM
2

What did she say a "real man" was?
/r/MensRights08/01/14 06:04 PM
4

Stop hiring paid mouthpieces that tout the latest psychological theory to show that the children are best off with a dad who had never acted as their primary caregiver. Don’t believe me? How about the [latest psychological theory here in this report that I've cherry-picked and of which I will only quote the summary]? Wow. Literally in the span of a carriage return, the author does the one thing they tell men to stop doing.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 09:58 PM
2

Shocker.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 04:31 PM
4

Another way that the MRM is exactly like the KKK: We often literally drag women into the forest, murder them, set them on fire, hang them from trees, and hold rallies calling for the murder of all women. Plus both have three letters. We are obviously the exact same as the KKK. /s
/r/MensRights18/12/13 01:01 AM
0

The Male Allies – a group of male identified volunteers from the Women’s Resource Centre I think those are called 'men,' but sure, let's contribute to watering down sexual identities as much as possible.
/r/MensRights15/11/13 02:44 PM
15

Edit 2: Haha, fuck me, that's the extension. Never mind. lmfao, you just set yourself up and then trolled yourself.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 06:33 PM
3

Careful, that sounds like gender equality. This is feminism. This is a case that illustrates how different they are quite beautifully.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 06:54 PM
2

"There are lots of women with merit. It's not about merit or representation, it's about representation that includes merit." rubs forehead So, it's about both of the things you just said it wasn't about.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 06:47 PM
2

D'aww, shucks.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 07:47 PM
7

Just for you, since you're polite.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 02:11 AM
5

I would have said something to the effect of "why don't you focus on the facts in the picture rather than totally unrelated issues?" Or I would have highlighted the differentials in male to female deaths and injuries in the workplace, correlated it to actual risk of the type of work men and women do and historically have done, making it obvious that males must work more dangerous jobs than do women, and drawn the connection between real and perceived risk and danger in employment and compensatio…
/r/MensRights27/10/13 01:46 AM
16

See what I mean? There are an infinite number of hairs to split, and they are like hydras. There are different definitions to everything, different laws and regulations apply under specific circumstances, there are anecdotal cases and more exceptions to rules than there are rules. You and I could (but won't) right now get into a long-winded, heated, emotional argument about just the topic of gender differences in capital gains and investments. And that's only a smaller part of the bigger picture…
/r/MensRights27/10/13 01:34 AM
20

That's the point. People who argue like this attempt to bait a person into arguing an entirely different point than the original. It has to be a more controversial (ie conflicting data - the reason why the gender wage gap is a favorite; the sources of information on the topic are rife with conflict, many exaggerating the differences, many minimizing them) or more emotional (ie rape, molestation, etc., something that is much harder to refute or negate.) topic than to original, too. This is a grea…
/r/MensRights27/10/13 01:10 AM
196

Your post covered: Workplace deaths Prison sentences gender differences in homelessness rates cancer rates and expenditures longevity suicide Her only reply? GENDER WAGE GAP!!!! 77 cents on the dollar and I have to drive a lot! Workplace sexual harassment! MY PROBLEMS ARE WORSE THAN YOURS.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 08:25 PM
6

That's just obvious, isn't it? God has created every rapist, woman-hater, woman-murder, and male soldier everywhere since the beginning of time. We should have outlawed God years ago.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 12:05 AM
14

TL;DR: Hurricanes and earthquakes support the patriarchy. Natural disasters are social constructs, and we have to outlaw them to keep women, girls, and trans* people safe. /s
/r/MensRights13/10/13 11:32 PM
3

Good. In an age where rampant obesity is still on the rise and social skills are still decreasing, we'd better stamp out team-based physical activities. Oh wait. Pom-poms can't hurt anybody. Okay, just the boys then. /s
/r/MensRights08/10/13 01:02 PM
0

economic partnership of equals She gets 70% of his shit Inequality is equality. You have won 1 Doublethink point.
/r/MensRights06/10/13 12:41 PM
5

This incident is a prime example of how social media can assist law enforcement in quickly disseminating information and resolving cases," police reported. Interesting, since the information being disseminated was later proven totally inaccurate and founded in fear and paranoia. Had a name or an address come out, it could have resulted in vigilante 'justice'. It's actually a prime example of why the public at large actually shouldn't be trusted with such information.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 12:19 AM
6

Yay! Censorship! Banning things always works. It worked in the Prohibition, it worked for prostitution and illegal drugs, and it will definitely work now. /s
/r/MensRights26/09/13 02:33 AM
2

Me: "Which one already has my wallet in it, belt in the loops, keys in one of the belt loops, and headphones in the pocket?" If said pair is clean, I'm off. EDC is rounded off by my phone and my sunglasses (which actually go in the collar of my shirt) and my pocket knife if I'm not going to work.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 02:22 AM
10

Right? The character in the video game just shot 8 male gang members in the face point blank, then poisoned another and decapitate a tenth, but then the character called a woman a b[slur]. That might hurt a woman's feelings somewhere. This video game simply reeks of woman-hating. It perpetuates the patriarchy whenever it can. And it sets up kids to be numb to the bad behaviors of fucking murdering people being mean to girls (way worse).
/r/MensRights22/09/13 02:43 AM
20

Amazing. "Profound misogyny" includes murdering hundreds of men (really, as many as you want) and [minor spoilers] raping one.
/r/MensRights22/09/13 12:20 AM
1

Oh. Shit. Well fuck, at least I'm gay. Dodge most feminists right there. And as long as I never have kids, I might just eek by without the vast majority of this bullshit.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 03:11 AM
3

"That's Fantastic" "That's Fantastic" "That's Fantastic" "That's Fantastic" "That's Fantastic" "That's Fantastic" Wow, what an incredibly annoying and unprofessional person. I can't help but notice that whatever issue had come up between them, though obviously still touchy, had been resolved and he was leaving. He was fine, he was moving on, and never even so much as raised his voice. Then she decided to open her mouth and insult and harass him in front of the entire store and (sarcastically?) o…
/r/MensRights20/09/13 03:08 AM
3

Does that mean that the feminism movement is getting closer to burning itself out completely like a dying star, or that it's going to get worse?
/r/MensRights20/09/13 02:58 AM
12

Yes. It's just a different notation. Both characters are available on a standard keyboard without typing the ALT code. The notation comes from computer programming, many languages of which use !=.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 12:20 AM
3

I'm really conflicted on this. On one hand she's saying in not-so-few words that boys' sexual interest and perhaps warped sexual expectations is strongly encouraged by girls' apparent lack of hesitation at participation. If girls have no problem with posting pictures of themselves nearly naked and posing in a sexual fashion, then it's a consequence that boys might expect them to always be ready to have sex. And then girls call boys and men creeps for having sexual interests when this behavior wa…
/r/MensRights13/09/13 01:13 PM
2

But why would I bother trying to explain the fact that there were many women also chanting for rape, acting as individuals with a shred of accountability, if I can say that it was the fault of all men because all men propagate rape culture which in turn directly or indirectly coerced those women into chanting for rape?
/r/MensRights07/09/13 10:08 PM
6

OH COME ON. Walk into Outback Steakhouse. "Yes, I'm looking to buy a new pair of sneakers." "Ma'am, this is a fucking restaurant." "I'M BEING OPPRESSED JUST BECAUSE I WANT SHOES! YOU NEED TO GIVE OUT FREE SHOES TO THE SHOELESS OR MAKE A DONATION TO AFRICA BECAUSE YOU ARE SO INSENSITIVE TO PEOPLE WHO WANT SHOES." She's literally just attacking a space that is woman-free, for no other reason to be a complete heel or to get some money out of them for fucking nothing.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 01:41 AM
5

It is perfectly acceptable to display hatred against someone if they are straight, white, Christian, or male or a combination of these traits. Especially in the context of universities with strong numbers of women and white knights enrolled in such programs as Women's Studies and the like. It then basically just becomes a circlejerk, as these things often do. Because anyone who is straight, white or male is just drowning in their privilege*, and they have never been opressed, ever, by anyone. (*…
/r/MensRights26/08/13 05:27 PM
2

Yeah, but you look way more suspicious (and douchebaggish) if you sit there like a stump while a police officer questions you. If you don't cooperate at all, you give the cop more reason to suspect that you have something or are doing something that you don't want them to know about. OP talked to the cop and wasn't arrested. Even though the original reason was bullshit nothing bad happened except for a helicopter mother accusing him of being a pedophile. If you say "Nothing, officer, just trying…
/r/MensRights22/08/13 10:23 PM
13

Male managers were paid an average bonus of £6,442 last year versus £3,029 for women, figures from the Chartered Management Institute show. At directorship level the pay gap is even starker, with male directors earning an average bonus of £63,700 versus £36,270 for female directors last year. Less stark, in fact: £6,442/£3,029 = £2.13 bonus to male managers versus £1 female managers £63,700/£36,270 = £1.76 bonus to male directors versus £1 female directors I mean, wow. Math doesn't even count an…
/r/MensRights20/08/13 05:49 PM
70

On WEEKENDS? Jesus fucking Christ, why didn't they just give her a time-out and tell her that she was a bad girl?
/r/MensRights19/08/13 10:02 PM
1

This post violates the rules of the subreddit as it is clearly a call for vote and post brigading.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 03:36 PM
1

No no, I'm dead serious. That's a quote right? I can't remember where it comes from.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 09:20 PM
2

It's mind boggling. If you accept the premise that there is no such thing as objective truth, all logic breaks down. Reason is destroyed because there is no logic or truth. What's left? Feelings. Suddenly the only thing that matters is your feelings and other's feelings and making sure no one's feelings are hurt by any then ever. Then we OD on political correctness and allow a bunch of people studying for an unacademic, unscientific, unapplyable, gendered and discriminatory field (Women's Studie…
/r/MensRights06/08/13 04:26 PM
1

Why is this so familiar to me? I cannot place it for the life of me. I feel like it is a quote from something.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 02:45 PM
6

It's like anti-objectivity. "Nothing is real. Everything is an idea. There are no facts. Only feelings."
/r/MensRights06/08/13 02:30 AM
3

Not to mention that even talking about making milk chocolate again to bring milk chocolate and dark chocolate back into something closer to balance has you labelled as a dark chocolate hater, even though all you want is to have both, not one at the expense of the other.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 02:11 PM
59

Have you read he books? It's way worse than that once you start deconstructing the characters in the slightest: Bella is a teenage girl who is trying to appear as much more smart and restrained than her peers, especially the males. She never drinks or does any drugs whatsoever, Instead preferring to knock out weekends by memorizing poetry and literature. Edward and Jacob (the vampire and the werewolf respectively) are monsters who kill animals constantly to survive. Edward formerly murdered huma…
/r/MensRights04/08/13 11:33 AM
7

Probably not for the best; even if there was no evidence of significant upvote ratios being perturbed after it was linked to here, we would still be labelled vote-brigaders.
/r/MensRights01/08/13 11:01 PM
-9

misogynist *misogynistic
/r/MensRights01/08/13 10:59 PM
6

They should go protest like this in Saudi Arabia and experience what an actual oppressive patriarchy is like.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 12:51 AM
6

I thought I knew that there was a different etymology. Wasn't sure on it though so I just went with my gut. My gut was wrong.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 09:21 PM
4

That's exactly what I said, isn't it?
/r/MensRights24/07/13 09:19 PM
11

Lots of people. Feminists, for example, love it because they get to hang something else around men's necks (claiming of course that it was only men doing the bad stuff, like "only men would own property, and thus only men owned slaves"). Black people still call white people "crackers" as in "crackers of the whips that whipped my ancestors" even though they've probably never been whipped and 90% of white people who aren't ranchers have never touched a whip. So obviously they kinda think that too,…
/r/MensRights24/07/13 08:27 PM
2

This. OP, tell your brother that even if he has to pay for another paternity test on his own dime if he smells anything crooked about the lab she and her lawyers use, it could end up being a far far cheaper alternative than paying for 6 years of retroactive child support. In fact, he'd almost be and idiot not to get his own tests performed. Everyone on her side would benefit if they paid a lab to fake the results (her lawyers, her, etc). This case is no doubt tens of thousands of dollars in valu…
/r/MensRights24/07/13 08:19 PM
14

The idea that white people in the past were responsible for bad things, and that white people alive today should, or do, feel guilty about those events happening. the ones over which they had no control or responsibility or participation in. So, I should or so feel guilty because my ancestors owned slaves.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 08:12 PM
4

Look here! One of the posters to a thread on MR said something about a sammich! And this one uses a slur!! I don't care that the comments have negative karma, it's PROOF that ALL MRA's are misogynists!
/r/MensRights23/07/13 03:43 PM
2

Ain't nobody got time for dat!
/r/MensRights18/07/13 10:28 AM
14

"I need feminism because I still pay for my own birth control." They want all of the rights, none of the responsibilities, and then hand-outs on top of that for finance their lifestyle choices. If a guy wants to have lots of protected sex, he pays for condoms. If a girl wants to have lots of protected* sex, she gets the government to pay for it. * In this case, 'protected' only means 'against possibility of having a child,' not 'against STDs'. That's a different handout that they would get later…
/r/MensRights18/07/13 10:27 AM
8

This is the part that honestly made me laugh. It's such a widespread phenomenon in society that women actively circumvent birth control to either turn a boyfriend into a husband or jump start the family. Women constantly encourage each other to make a mistake happen, especially in the context of a new couple when the husband doesn't want to get started right away and the wife is eager. "Whoops!" they say, "Well we were going to have a kid anyway, right? Might as well be now!"
/r/MensRights18/07/13 10:19 AM
2

Fukken autocorrect. I'm just gonna leave it like that for fun.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 07:33 AM
2

I really can't find any sources about her story other than YouTube, which I can't access, so that's based on the top reply to this link (here). I will edit my post again to reflect this.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 07:53 PM
1

Do you know where I can read more about this? I can't access YouTube from work, and I am having no luck finding any news articles about this (which you really really think there would be, what with all the outcry I was expecting).
/r/MensRights17/07/13 06:28 PM
74

"It was meant," he continued, sobbing crocodile tears as the law the patriarchy wrote to subjugate women forced him to oppress this woman into oblivion, "for viscous, leering MEN!" Edit: I write this even though I strongly disagree with the sentence and think it is wildly out of proportion to the crime. However, this case illustrates in a very very harsh light just how insane this particular law is and it will hopefully be a great tool to help change the law and prevent others from being dealt t…
/r/MensRights17/07/13 05:39 PM
1

Isn't hormonal birth control just the best thing ever?
/r/MensRights17/07/13 12:45 AM
3

And those people are still allowed to voice their opinions in a handful of select venues. I know, right? How dare other people have a different opinion than me? They should not be allowed to talk about their disgusting views that are not the exact same as mine, even if it doesn't really effect me other than knowing that they exist.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 06:48 PM
2

starts objectifying women, huge increase in libido... Shit, we're going to see radfems dumping xenoestrogens into water supplies soon. all of a sudden starts becoming interested in science. Wow, that's really interesting. I'm really suprised that the link is so evident. (At work, can't listen to podcast, so I really appreciate the TL;DR you gave.)
/r/MensRights16/07/13 06:44 PM
2

From the notes section: What the shit, you could say that about anything people study just because it’s women studies you’ve flipped out. Nope. The woman in the picture is gendering the issue, and both she and the poster of the above commenter are ignoring how utterly useless this type of degree is. People who hold Women's Studies degrees often only go on to educate others in Women's Studies or to write books in the field. I don't think that that's any real contribution to society as compared to…
/r/MensRights16/07/13 06:33 PM
0

Civil Rights, Gay Rights, and Feminism (1st wave, not this current bullshit) were all waged from the ranks of the oppressed, and are heralded as the best way example to follow. Unfortunately, Radical Feminism, including much of the 2nd and 3rd waves of Feminism, are based on heavily edited versions of Marxist theory and as such are not compatible. They just keep beating the collective horses that aren't getting any deader, and they are getting more and more ugly and violent with it in their frus…
/r/MensRights16/07/13 05:28 PM
4

"I need a social movement of people who agree with me because there are other people that don't agree with me."
/r/MensRights16/07/13 05:08 PM
3

...Oh. Shit. Thank you for letting me know.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 01:13 AM
4

... I know. I wrote it. As a response for someone asking it to be rewritten as such. I thought that was obvious.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 12:59 AM
1

That sounds like a more sensible arrangement to me, but I'm not experienced in the area. I guess if you grow up with it (kids in dual custody setups) you get used to it.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 06:37 PM
4

Ah. Well then. An expert witness. Carry on, OP.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 06:36 PM
4

Doesn't she realize how exhausting that would be for the kids? Essentially moving every 3-4 days back and forth? Do you two live down the block from each other or something?
/r/MensRights14/07/13 05:22 PM
12

Two massive things in this article: 1 - The title: "Man enough to eschew violence" /facedesk So, once again, women (the only gender represented in the article except the guy talking about the phone service) are defining men's gender identity (whether or not they are 'real men') by how good they are at supressing their innate need to kill and rape everything they see. Lovely. 2 - ''When we followed up six months later, these 16- and 17-year-olds had lots of examples of how they had intervened in …
/r/MensRights14/07/13 03:34 PM
19

I wrote this article as an imitation of the original article, to highlight how shocking his story is and the double standard. Note that this is a reply to someone asking it to be rewritten as such. Lindsey Aberdeen, now aged 20, has recently been ordered by the Ontario Family Court of Perth to pay child support to her rapist, 36-year-old Mark Whitby. Whitby was hired by Aberdeen’s parents as a babysitter following positive recommendation by close family friends, in 2005, when Aberdeen was 14 yea…
/r/MensRights14/07/13 02:03 PM
0

EDIT: I am bad at words today. Wasn't trying to defend the boucer, it was supposed to read something along the lines of [He could have] tried to break up a violent altercation, which is what his job is [instead of just joining it without thought].
/r/MensRights12/07/13 07:54 PM
21

Ooooooh! Nice.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 09:12 PM
3

Have you considered going to your employer and letting them know that your insane ex-wife is out to get you?
/r/MensRights11/07/13 07:38 PM
58

It's the idea of those women seeing men as ATMs. They don't care if he's ugly... if he's rich. If he isn't rich, there's no chance.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 06:42 PM
5

Or assist someone with getting a heavy bag into an overhead bin. Or struggle to get a stuck door open during an emergency exit of the aircraft. Or stop a violent altercation between passengers, or a terrorist from getting to the flight deck. I do not understand why people, feminsts especially obviously, are such assholes about denying that there are any differences whatsoever between genders, and refuse to accept that there are some things men are better at and women just can't compete equally i…
/r/MensRights08/07/13 10:24 PM
7

"Today's sentence should serve as a warning to anyone thinking of making false allegations of rape." Half of a two-year sentence and a fine about equal to dinner out for a family. Oh yeah, that'll show 'em. /s Especially compared to the maximum (read: probably the actual) sentenced term of 5 years a piece to her rapists.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 08:57 PM
5

"Men, I'm going to talk to you about Feminism, one of the main goals of which is to end unnecessary gender roles that do more harm than good. To establish my 'man cred' to you, I'm going to bullshit up a bunch of gender roles that I actively participate in that will show you that I'm really a man. I have body hair, drink beer not wine, eat steak not salad, I have allergies (????), and I don't do dishes. See how manly I am? Oh, and I'm not a faggot or a pussy, because I carry a knife with me." Ju…
/r/MensRights07/07/13 08:14 PM
2

Yeah, exactly. Gay people who blend into a community rather than purposely exhibit their differences for no other reason than to say "hey, I'm different, look at me" are the ones who get it done.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 05:05 PM
1

Again, I'm not the jury nor do I claim to know their motivations in reaching the final verdicts. But that is the way things have gone before.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 04:12 PM
1

Do you mean pride parades or current gay icons?
/r/MensRights30/06/13 04:24 AM
1

I'm not familiar with the case (and there's nothing in the article that makes clear the jury's position), but I'd bet my bottom dollar that the consensus position of the jury is that while both were active in the crime, they believe the wife was only motivated to do it by her husband. That she would not have done it had he not forced her to; how could they sentence her for being the victim of a controlling husband that forced her to participate?
/r/MensRights30/06/13 01:13 AM
0

Speaking as a gay man, I agree with you very much. It's an active display of what clearly already makes people uncomfortable, and you are literally shoving the proverbial shit into people's noses and saying "get used to the smell." Yeah, that's going to help your cause. (Running with the example of gay pride parade, as it is the most common 'pride'...) Meanwhile, look at the actual progress that has been made in the area of gay rights. Most of it is from proponents and activists that are not lit…
/r/MensRights30/06/13 12:40 AM
22

"...the Canadian Foreskin Awareness Project (CAN-FAP)..." All right, well done PR department.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 08:40 PM
1

Yes, exactly. I was trying to come up with a way to mention race blindness, but couldn't.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 08:15 AM
1

Only second worst to "lowering fitness standards to enable women to make the cut"
/r/MensRights27/06/13 08:10 AM
2

You're getting too specific with it to see my point. It's also a hypothetical. The point is that men and women are better at different things. Testosterone enables men to have larger stronger muscles than women, all other factors being equal. Obviously a female bodybuilder could lift much more than a male cancer patient, but if a woman is struggling to lift something, then it does not contribute to breaking down gender roles to ignore her becuase a man could do it and we must see men and women a…
/r/MensRights26/06/13 08:59 PM
102

To a point though, right? One extreme on the continuum of recognizing gender differences is to say that women are women are weak, emotional creatures that can only vomit out babies and men are violent, sex crazed, morons. The other extreme though is that you don't acknowledge the differences between the genders; the things that make people unique and that make heterosexual romance/appreciation happen. A man would not be doing women a favor by trying to be blind to gender roles by telling her tha…
/r/MensRights26/06/13 08:41 PM
46

"Because they could theoretically hold similar jobs" my ass. Let's see a female nursery worker on the back of a trash truck, throwing 40 pound bags of stinky, leaving, akward garbage over her hips into the back for 6 hours straight, as opposed to walking in a nice, quiet, climate-controlled facility, lifting 10 pound infants and changing diapers. I don't understand how this case made it to this level.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 01:53 PM
1

Women demand to make the same money and be given the same chances at over time, bonuses, promotions, and benefits as men. And are constantly screaming about how they dont with 'glass ceilings,' (though they are just fine with glass floors), "77 cents on the dollar," discrimination because of their needs, etc. But then also paid maternity leave (and is much longer than paternity leave, where that exists), extra health benefits for things like breast cancer screenings, pap smears, etc, 'emergency'…
/r/MensRights26/06/13 01:41 PM
1

REDDITIST!
/r/MensRights26/06/13 12:02 AM
5

ALL GENDERS ARE EQUAL BUT SOME GENDERS ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 09:47 PM
13

Nearly 86% of American men and 67% of women work more than 40 hours in any given week 0.67/0.86 = ... 0.779 I FOUND IT GUYS! SEVENTY SEVEN CENTS ON THE DOLLAR!
/r/MensRights25/06/13 09:44 PM
3

The thing is if I take my daughter's testimony [OF EMOTIONAL ABUSE], it will be viewed by the court as inappropriate parenting. "Daddy, it's funny to yell at you. Mommy says it's funny to yell at you." Fuck the justice system Family Court.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 09:37 PM
1

Angela Mollard: 1 down, 3.5 billion to go.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 12:11 AM
0

We should ban automatic antifreeze dispensers and antifreeze containers larger than what is needed for self-defense against dirty winter windshields.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 08:40 PM
3

Dr. Margaret Chan, called it "a global health problem of epidemic proportions," and other experts said screening for domestic violence should be added to all levels of health care. Oh fantastic. Sometime in the near future, a woman will go in for her yearly checkup with a bruise, and within 10 minutes her no doubt violent, abusive husband will be arrested and put in jail. Just in case.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 06:29 PM
1

Her name is Big Red. Or Mars. Goddess of Bitchiness. What is a "flexible work arrangement to help [new mothers] return from parental leave" considered? Are women expecting to get months off work and then start back with half days or reduced hours or special programs or something?
/r/MensRights22/06/13 12:37 PM
1

Is she really really sick of being Prime Minister or something?
/r/MensRights22/06/13 12:33 PM
1

Reverse Houdini. Ties hands and feet then chops his own head off.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 02:22 PM
20

On Nov. 23, 2012, I was sexually assaulted... ...I was invited to set up a meeting with the Head of Student Life on March 25. Due to the time of year and the amount of time this process had already taken, I declined the offer to meet. So having kept up with the proceedings, demanding information, sending at least dozens of emails and meeting with two people over the course of four months, she then decides that it's been too long and the time of the year was wrong (...) and she gives up all proce…
/r/MensRights17/06/13 10:04 PM
2

Fair point. I mean, look at her actual logic here. In her mind, there are three people involved in every "paid encounter." The prostitute, the pimp, and the customer. In her mind, the pimp and the customer are both men (ie she doesn't 'believe in' female customers or pimps [even though she was actually a madame, fucking wow]). The customer is there to slake his uncontrollable, violent lust, and the pimp is there to subjugate and force the woman to work for him and take this paid rape to get him …
/r/MensRights17/06/13 01:58 PM
18

She thinks prostitution laws should be decriminalized for sex workers, but remain illegal for customers and pimps Whoa. She has a serious case of the dumb.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 10:29 PM
2

Every fucking time...
/r/MensRights14/06/13 02:57 AM
1

Uh, except she was in on it and agreed to the script before hand? Is she contributing to the rape patriarchy now too?
/r/MensRights11/06/13 03:21 PM
3

Okay, that is somehow way* more fucking terrifying than big brother.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 03:17 PM
37

The fuck is wrong with every Governor named "Rick"?
/r/MensRights10/06/13 08:11 PM
3

The thing about vasectomies is that the vast majority of the time, it's not "snip snip bye," there is a surgery, and then a followup, consisting of at least a test of ejaculate for live sperm (to ensure that the patient is now 'shooting blanks'). The fact is that they don't often fuck up vasectomies, and that the rate of natural reversal, (going from shooting blanks to shooting sperm again - 'recanalization') happens at very very low rates - 0.4%.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 08:47 AM
1

That message belongs in the same decade their outfits and hair styles came from.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 12:48 AM
2

Her: "I'm not going to have sex with a robot." I think her place of residence should be checked for devices that seek to make men "irrelevant," which would include vibrators (kinda robotic), dildos, personal lubricants, KY-Jelly covered cucumbers... etc. And if robots are supposed to cause women to lose their spot as the providers of sexual intimacy and expression, then they would have already thanks to masturbation and flesh lights. Clearly not the case. Sounds like she is just being hysterical…
/r/MensRights26/05/13 12:42 AM
1

Second line.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 05:13 PM
3

Hey, worst case scenario, he can fast track his way through community college.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 03:20 AM
4

Uh. Link to the video?
/r/MensRights05/05/13 04:00 AM
3

God damn, those motherfuckers are elegant as shit.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 01:49 AM
1

1) No source, no link, no article, no nothing. 2) Liked her own Facebook status. 3) "Inquiring research currently." Sentence fragment, name of a journal (ninja-edit: nope) or letting readers know that she is looking for more bullshit research that she won't source or share? OP, if this is OC, keep us updated!
/r/MensRights20/03/13 03:43 AM
12

Ycombinator profile of mr-hank, the man who lost his job. For more perspective. He was fired, his friend was not. The "forking joke" wasn't a joke about fucking, it was something Adria misunderstood since she lacked context, but reacted blindly to in rage and immaturity. The only thing more upsetting about the entire situation is that this guy is just taking it. He says that he respects Adria and her freedom to... get him fired because of a joke. At the moment, it doesn't seem like he's going to…
/r/MensRights20/03/13 03:35 AM
13

She claims she did this because "forking" and "dongle" jokes might prevent children, especially girls, from entering the field. ...is she fucking kidding? She got a person FIRED, setting back his career, because he made a pun (not easily understood by children) to his friend privately (not in front of children). Because that will harm children.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 03:27 AM
56

Fun highlight points from the article: This would apparently cover private pictures and text messages - it would be an infraction to take a shot of your junk and send it to your s/o. "The Report on Eliminating Gender Stereotypes in the EU" (the basis of the vote) can be found here. Read it without getting angry that obvious bullshit is going to actually be read and voted on by the largest political body on the planet. I dare you. (Highlight highlights: gender wage gap, glass ceilings, etc everyw…
/r/MensRights07/03/13 03:56 AM
12

DIFFERENTLY ABLED, you sexist, neckbeard, pedophile, rape-apologizing, basement-dwelling, SHITLORD! ^^^^<sup><sup>/s</sup></sup>
/r/MensRights28/02/13 02:49 PM
1

It would still be the same effect, it would be taken as Reddit as a whole censoring the story of a rape victim.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 07:27 PM
0

If Reddit took down any article talking about a rape victim being further victimized by the patriarchy institution, what do you think the reaction would be? Because it can't be proved either way, the safest thing is just to leave it and wait until the evidence and the case are resolved, and the comments sections can be updated to redact the information if/when its proven wrong, even if the original articles and submissions aren't.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 07:22 PM
5

[s] It's patriarchy because if there wasn't patriarcy, then more women would be becoming politicians that women could vote for. They would be a majority too. [/s] edit: I a word.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 12:39 AM
0

Why is that sad? It works for them.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 07:13 PM
13

I wonder what it would be like if that dating site that allowed women to set a minimum height for male suitors also allowed men to set a minimum bra cup size or a maximum weight for female suitors.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 05:21 AM
8

While I agree that men going through divorce proceedings, especially when there are children involved, are often totally fucked over (and that goes double in my country of Canada), taking up this viewpoint is like what some radical feminists say, to avoid men (in this case marriage to women) all together because they are eventually going to rape or beat you (or in this case take all of your money and children in divorce court). That being said, every time I read about some guy who has to pay ali…
/r/MensRights15/02/13 04:47 PM
34

Telling young boys that they are monsters that need additional education to suppress their barely contained demand to beat women ISN'T GOING TO HELP ANYTHING. It will lead to more depression, and will thus make them more prone to lash out violently or to become suicidal. I hate the look of the road society is moving down.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 07:51 PM
2

A dominatrix is sexy and assertive, while a dominant man is a freak who needs to satisfy his misogynistic complex to control women. A woman who enjoys submitting is sexy, a man submitting is pitiful. When a woman brings forth such uncommon sexual activities she is being kinky. When a man does, he had better be damned sure he won’t get chased out of town for being a loser pervert. Oh my god. I've never even made this connection before. Bravo. Double standards everywhere.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 12:42 AM
11

Can you expand on the better and worse parts of chivalry?
/r/MensRights08/02/13 01:39 AM
4

Exactly. Don't get me wrong, rape and molestation are horrible acts for any human, but it's not like only women can experience them, nor is it true that torture isn't equally insidious, which again, is horrible and can be done to both sexes. (Edit: maybe insidious is the wrong word. Harmful, destructive, painful, evil, wrong, etc.)
/r/MensRights04/02/13 04:21 PM
17

The second comment: "If captured, these women would be molested and raped before being killed by the enemy." People really think that that doesn't happen to men in a POW situation? Or that nothing like that (like torture) happens to men and they are just mercifully and summarily executed?
/r/MensRights04/02/13 03:25 PM
2

Not arguing that this has nothing to do with MRA, but, doesn't this study show exactly that, that housework is a function of sex? Jk, correlation =/= causation, I know.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 12:51 AM
2

Pariahs or piranhas?
/r/MensRights31/01/13 12:44 AM
5

Is it just me, or does that sound like a factor that could lessen the impartiality of lawyers and judges? And create more cases in courts of Family Law that overly favor women?
/r/MensRights31/01/13 12:42 AM
6

And cue the SRSters people crying out that /r/mensrights once again wants racism to be acceptable.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 12:36 AM
0

Ha, I love tin foil hatters. Got any good links?
/r/MensRights29/01/13 02:28 AM
11

TEDxWomen. They somehow are perceived to have all the credibility of TED, even while exercising sexism in their name by exclusively allowing women speakers. And there's no TEDxMen, so since male and female speakers regularly appear on TED, it's gender discrimination.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 02:26 AM
1

"Well then obviously that's bad." Then I asked him where he drew the line, and he dodged the question and started bringing up other issues again. I fear it's a lost cause.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 07:44 PM
1

Ah, now I see. Glad I didn't seem that way after all. It's being... annoying dealing with this.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 07:42 PM
1

I'm sorry if it seemed like I was being inciteful, but yeah, this argument has obviously caused more than a little frustration on my part.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 06:11 PM
1

That's exactly what I said, at which point, he started the purity, innocence, and pain of childbirth arguments.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 04:10 PM
2

Yeah, I'm just going to drop the whole thing. No sense of it when he and I fundamentally disagree about something to this degree and while many other men agree with me, it's ultimately his opinion and I don't think I'm going to change it.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 04:08 PM
1

I get what you are saying. But I think that even if I walked him through that line of logic, he'd get caught up tying a homosexual female rapist to a heterosexual female rapist, since that victim would be a male who would enjoy it. He thinks that I, a homosexual male, could get raped by a woman, since I don't desire them, but that heterosexuals can't, since it is their purpose in life. Yeah...
/r/MensRights17/01/13 05:42 AM
1

She inserts a Q-tip into your urethra and climbs on top. Pardon my launguage, but... THE FUCK? Does that give a guy a boner? ...ew? Guys with any sense of boundaries want their consent respected. Like I said, he said that if he told a girl 'no', and she dragged him home and tied him to his bed and fucked him, he'd call it a kinky night and be proud that the woman 'needed' him bad enough to have to go to such lengths to have him.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 05:40 AM
1

Thanks. He also dropped a really homophobic statement during the argument ("if I didn't enjoy [female contact/attention/nudity], I'd have to be gay." [brain explodes]) that he backpedaled from and tried to save. His main stance later on was that biologically speaking, males are here to impregnate women, it's the only way they can contribute to the species progeny, so they automatically are fulfilling that role and are built to enjoy it.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 05:37 AM
2

The purity and innocence arguments are just wrong. So there's no real way to address that. It's just sexist. He says it comes from society's perception of women and gender roles, that they have a pressure to keep themselves in that state (virgin or at least closer to that than being a whore) whereas men don't. (aka the Stud versus Slut argument, which I still don't know how to counter.) If the argument is that women can get pregnant or injured during rape then a guy who has a vasectomy and is ca…
/r/MensRights17/01/13 05:32 AM
1

I did, and he expressed that it would be a little bad. But later, when I asked him to try to make the issue of the woman's attractiveness disappear, to abstract beyond it, he said that if attractiveness were not considered, he'd say he'd be fine with any female doing something like that to him. Even later in the conversation still, he said that he'd be fine getting raped by 'any woman who was from a 5 to a 10 [on the scale of attractiveness].' My mind is full of billions and billions of fuck. No…
/r/MensRights17/01/13 05:30 AM
15

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_burn_centers_in_the_United_States
/r/MensRights16/01/13 04:19 AM
1

Swish.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 04:18 AM
1

Beyonce, the singer of the song Run The World (Girls) said this? Did irony just take human form?
/r/MensRights16/01/13 03:52 AM
3

"What's that? A girl showed up at a bar at 1 AM shitfaced wearing what amounts to half of a standard shirt, short shorts and high heels got raped? No, she bears absolutely no responsibility for the situation, especially since she was drunk; she wasn't fully aware of her actions. "The man who raped her though, even though he had a BAC significantly higher than her, was fully responsible for his actions, even if the alcohol in his system impaired his judgement. He must be put in jail for the rest …
/r/MensRights15/01/13 12:26 AM
9

"Harmless ignorance." A deep slice into paradox.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 04:36 AM
3

Chiming in with a vote for "Male Suicide." Men's suicide just isn't the best here.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 04:32 AM
2

FUCKING WOW. Depressed man: "I can't actually be depressed, I have the garage to myself!"
/r/MensRights11/01/13 04:28 AM
4

Thats because in a woman-less society, there would be less available victims for us men to rape to death and vomit testosterone onto. Because, you know, that's all we do apparently. That and stab each other to death. /s
/r/MensRights11/01/13 04:20 AM
1

Six of these seven destinations disallow women to enter based on religious restrictions; Hindu, Bhuddist, or Islamic. I don't really agree with the sexual restrictions, but I agree with a practitioners' rights to try to live within their religious restrictions. The last is a water slide, and it has caused multiple torn vaginas. The authorities are working on a fix, and refusing women since it is a specific risk. Complaining about that is like a child complaining that he can't go play in the rust…
/r/MensRights10/01/13 01:33 AM
1

"We're less on testosterone." Someone missed both a grammar class and a biology class.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 01:26 AM
1

Why were her child pornography charges stayed? Is there any information on this? Because in the case of a convicted male, the animal cruelty charges would be ignored while he was crucified for the child porn charges and made an example of since he craved to butcher the homeless while he was fucking those toddlers. (The last part was a ironic reflection of how hysterical my country's media gets about things like this when it comes to men.)
/r/MensRights10/01/13 01:24 AM
2

Translation: "We're better than men. We deserve to control everything." Media reaction: Applause. I don't know why this makes my blood boil so much. It's like that shithead Sharon Osbourne laughing uproariously at male genital mutilation and the entire dammed audience laughing along with her. Or all the girls who were, a few years ago, giving themselves aneurisms screaming with Beyonce "GIRLS! WE RUN THE WORLD~!" and shit like that, all while claiming to champion "gender equality."
/r/MensRights10/01/13 01:11 AM
2

I was reading that article like this: "One female senator had this to say." Female Senator X agreed. Female Senator Y agreed with Senator X's agreement. Female Senator Z...
/r/MensRights10/01/13 01:08 AM
5

I don't really think that this is appropriate for this subreddit; this is more of a "girls are mean, too" post.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 12:53 AM
4

I don't even know how to react to that. That is so fucking stupid. People rail against gender inequality, yet this text says "boys take up more room in the community than girls." I must ask, is this the sort of text book that also contains a chapter on gender discrimination which uses the definition that only women can be discriminated against?
/r/MensRights10/01/13 12:46 AM
0

She, a 20 year old, wanted him, a 14 year old, to pay her, the person who committed the crime, child support for the child that he actually didn't end up being the father of? Fucking wow. I'm insanely glad that it didn't end up happening that this guy isn't financially responsible for the child that was created while he was raped, I'm still intensely sad and disappointed that its unlikely that she's going to face criminal charges, and if she does, they are still going to be a wrist slap compared…
/r/MensRights29/12/12 05:41 AM
1

"Because sex came before nine." The couple was participating in mutual oral sex. LMFAO. Sorry. Why would she be having sex with the guy if she heard her boyfriend having sex with another woman over the phone (phone sex? Did he cock dial her during a hookup with another woman?)? And why beat him over him over him ceasing to pleasure her, rather than the cheating? She sounds like she's a few fries short of a happy meal.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 05:34 AM
1

Yes, extremely. This was not handled very well; both of them should have been sent to a mediating party rather than being told to do it somewhere else. That could be the start of a very bad series of events.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 05:27 AM
1

I think it's more along the thread of "why are the vast majority of teachers female when we know that less proficient at preventing or stopping violent confrontations?" It's just fact that most women would not be able to, or desire to, step in between two males and break up a right or keep it from happening. It's similar to the statistics that show that children raised in single mother homes are more likely to have various mental health issues and criminal involvement later in life. It's not sex…
/r/MensRights29/12/12 05:25 AM
3

"Well, I got off of work, grabbed some groceries, dropped off my dry cleaning, got raped, went out for drinks with some friends, went home a met my husband to go work out, then we had sex." Mmmmmmm.... No. No person who had just gotten raped for an hour and a half would be able to go for drinks, then work out, then have sex again within the next three hours. That is completely and utter bullshit. I never gotten raped before, but if you are in a physical state such that you can go out with friend…
/r/MensRights24/12/12 05:35 PM
1

Supposed to be more, haha, I was on my Moms iPad.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 05:48 AM
2

Married drivers are safer?
/r/MensRights21/12/12 08:38 PM
31

She wanted to come back to my house, so we did and we were cuddling but she saw a Facebook message and found something she did not like. "Next thing I knew she swung round and hit me with a glass and my face began to pour with blood. Holy fuck. "I can't deal with something that I saw on Facebook, so I am going to break a glass onto my boyfriends face." What a fucking childish action. Amazing. And like buster2209 says, "reverse the sexes..."
/r/MensRights21/12/12 06:18 PM
7

Holy shit, I've always heard how male drivers pay more for insurance than females drivers because they're assessed to be more risky drivers. I've never even seen that as sexism till now. Wow, the things that are built into society that you are blind to until you look objectively. Jeez. EDIT: Mateo -> more
/r/MensRights21/12/12 06:09 PM
1

Mainstream media not entirely honest about a key issue. In other news, fire is hot. More at 11- WAIT A SECOND!
/r/MensRights14/12/12 03:19 AM
1

Mandatory "gender course" to graduate Huh?
/r/MensRights10/12/12 06:08 PM
3

You've got to be fucking kidding me... Wow.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 12:50 AM
2

I'm Canadian; I have all the rights I need. There's a dumb rule about donating blood once you're sexually active, but I hope that's going to change relatively soon. I'm just hearing more and more about false rape, false date rape, 'the pay gap,' etc. Every court gives leniency to women and apparently gives the difference to men, flaunting reverse sexism (which is still sexism). Lawyers seem more and more like artists, creating reasons to justify protecting the woman and making examples of men. M…
/r/MensRights08/12/12 07:38 PM
5

The more time I spend in /r/MensRights, the more I thank my lucky stars that I'm gay. This is total bullshit. (edit: Stars, not scars.)
/r/MensRights08/12/12 07:20 PM
0

I'm so glad I'm not alone here. Fellow Canadian, eh?
/r/MensRights08/12/12 03:24 AM
0

I think a big part of the decision was also because she's a mother. Because everyone knows that kids can't possibly grow up without their mothers (/s). And if it was a man, it would be fine for him to rot in jail if they had a mother, or even for him to rot in jail and have the children put into foster homes. Y'know, even though there are studies that show that children of mother-only homes are x-times more likely to do drugs, go to prison, commit crimes, have mental issues, etc.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:46 PM
0

Do you doubt that a man with the exact same conditions and everything else would not be in prison right now instead of doing community service?
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:41 PM
2

You are responsible for what your car does if you are behind the wheel. And if you get behind the wheel drunk, and in an emotionally compromised state, you aren't excused from what happens. Moreover, she was assessed to have the cognitive function of a 9-year-old while she was driving (due to her being drunk and angry). Why was she driving in this state? Why, instead of being punished more severely punished, rather than in fact somehow mitigating her sentence. And who knows what happened? Maybe …
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:04 PM
2

This makes me incredibly sad. She was judged to have the cognitive function of a 9 year old. She was drunk. She crossed the dividing line, and collided head-on with a man on a motorcycle, so the accident was fully her fault. Her punishment was a day in jail. One day. And community service. If I was of the family of that man, I would be fighting this with everything I had. I can't believe that this could possibly considered justice, or that it will help her at all in the long run.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 08:56 PM
1

I was referring to the comment at the top of this thread. There should be an edit button with the rest of the grey links just below your comment.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 09:11 PM
1

Put it in quotations so people know that you aren't actually claiming it.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 08:54 PM
4

She raped him. Gave in alcohol and other drugs. Pretended to be his mother to take him out of classes and have sex with him. Got him addicted to speed. FIVE YEARS. I need more information about this ruling before I go fucking ballistic, because I feel like something has been taken out of context a little like that other case that was up here a few days ago.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 05:26 PM
11

Exactly this. Many women who hate nicknames like "sugar," "honey," "babe," etc, do so specifically because it trivializes them and compares them to children/babies. But using this as humor does exactly the same thing. I'm not getting hysterical about it though, it's just a really lame joke.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 10:11 PM
8

3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 should all be also apply to males. None of those are gender specific. And what the fuck is a "well-woman visit?"
/r/MensRights02/12/12 05:28 AM
-3

Rule 1: No memes or rage comics. IDGAF, Upvoted the F outta this S.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 04:43 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter