TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

xChrisTilDeathx Archive

View 1 posts and 48 comments by xChrisTilDeathx on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
48

Social IssuesxChrisTilDeathx/r/MensRights16/04/18 03:10 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
19

It also a “hard job” that gets easier the more independent your child becomes
/r/MensRights27/01/25 12:19 AM
4

Rapes*
/r/MensRights29/06/24 06:29 AM
59

/r/Menaregood
/r/MensRights11/12/19 03:23 AM
11

Didn’t they loose to a high school boys soccer team already?
/r/MensRights31/07/19 05:32 PM
2

This literally 100% wrong. They won’t take anyone they intact use affirmative action and meat quotas. At least in the 8 years i tried to get on a FD in the state of Florida
/r/MensRights05/03/19 08:29 PM
1

👐🏻 any curb fans out there?
/r/MensRights07/02/19 06:14 PM
3

Not even he’s just ignorant
/r/MensRights30/01/19 06:05 AM
16

The sad thing is she wasn’t fired for her a bigoted hatred for men, she’s like all the rest of the wonderful talented man-hating princes journalists were let go for an “admissible” reason. I.e. red tape, upper management or under the guise of a sound business decision. But not for what really matters: her toxic femininity. That message might of hit home and maybe force herself to look in the mirror and ask herself “Maybe I’m actually wrong and lack empathy?”
/r/MensRights25/01/19 10:26 PM
13

You clearly didn’t watch the video and are trying to assume a two wrongs don’t make a right position. It’s true but not applicable in this case. Educate yourself
/r/MensRights23/01/19 04:30 PM
2

What sub was this posed on that it got these down votes?
/r/MensRights21/01/19 03:45 PM
3

What should happen if there was a mans show with dudes laughing and taking about a depth chart of famous Hollywood actresses vaginas?
/r/MensRights18/01/19 08:16 PM
4

Self loathing white knight if he is in fact s male. Could you imagine shit talking statistics if you don’t like what they say? Then using statistics to base the motivation for an entire ethos off of them? (Feminisms)
/r/MensRights17/01/19 07:17 PM
5

So wait, it’s illegal to do a dna test with my son if my wife does not give me permission to do so here in the United States?
/r/MensRights14/01/19 12:31 AM
2

I can honestly say the love of others is what saved me from taking my own life. Guilt has really nothing to do with it
/r/MensRights10/01/19 04:59 PM
1

Its a double standard guy x hits on a girl and she finds him attractive therefore he’s “confident.” Guy y hits on a girl and she finds him unattractive therefore he’s “creepy.”
/r/MensRights04/01/19 06:09 AM
4

Exactly the argument is that sex dolls are a debasement of women. But wouldn’t a flesh light be an even more debasement? You can literally not debase a man any more than a dildo.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 09:01 PM
2

Can anyone give me instances where twitter stepped in and removed other anti feminist hashtags? I’m arguing with my cousins about this and he say they don’t remove anything so there’s no double standard
/r/MensRights17/08/18 11:23 PM
3

Editor or the NYT can’t even spell the fucking word twitter right... this woman has said a lot of ignorant shit https://reddit.com/r/sjwhate/comments/93vefx/meet_sarah_jeong_shes_on_the_nyt_editorial_board/
/r/MensRights02/08/18 03:19 PM
0

No it doesn’t mean that it means exactly what it means. There is no way your lame ass is going to break the ice no matter how tactful you approach a woman. In any way possible if she’s not into you and you speak up you’re a creeper. If you’re hot your confident. Good looking guys who YOU would consider a creep get fucked becuse they’re hot. But i can tell you right now no woman is gonna fuck some dude she’s not attracted to or who she thinks is a creepy. like i said she doesn’t perceive his adva…
/r/MensRights12/05/18 01:50 AM
5

It’s 100% a double standard and it’s not like you call girls creeps to their faces. Even though they should. And traditionally it’s the male who initiates social interaction. So when it happens to me i was never rude and would always say “I’m flatter but not interested” than was usually called a fag.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 05:36 PM
22

Exactly it’s another double standard.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 01:43 PM
27

Yeah but what’s the difference between a “creeper” and a guy who is “confident”? Both take courage and you’re defined by the term subjectively based on if the woman you’re approaching thinks your hot or not.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 01:29 PM
19

The messed up part about this is it prolly was only worth 2years and 6 months of her time, and she’s been making a “sacrifice” of 6 months. Giving her the opportunity to aligned herself with being righteous in the situation.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 12:32 AM
3

wow super helpful guys thanks!
/r/MensRights17/04/18 04:50 PM
2

Oh yeah that guys really out there
/r/MensRights13/04/18 04:07 AM
3

Who is Trudeau?
/r/MensRights13/04/18 02:39 AM
9

I can’t get enough of this guy
/r/MensRights12/04/18 11:53 PM
3

I’ve seen these types of videos before and they are so disturbing i can’t watch them anymore. Like i want to watch this but i can’t
/r/MensRights06/04/18 10:10 PM
14

I actually did say something. And no it’s not fair that if a woman would be more aware of discrimination due to her gender, because of the presence of empathy in our reality. The only way this argument holds up is if you have a presupposition of the fallacy known as the patriarch, and believe men are incapable of understanding what it’s like to be discriminated against. Even if you can hold firm to the belief that men have literally never been discriminated against you still can not prove you ne…
/r/MensRights05/03/18 06:05 PM
30

I’m not suggesting 7 female sex discrimination commissioners are unfair but if they are chosen only because they are female, then yes. But I’m not suggesting they are. Equality is not justice. Dont confuse the 2
/r/MensRights05/03/18 05:18 PM
33

Becaus of life. Because of Individualism. Because of competition. Because of basically an infinite amount of factors. Looking at thing from this narrow perspective is about as dumb as saying eating ice cream is correlated to murder rates. (It is true but not really the true reason why murder rates are higher in the summer.)
/r/MensRights05/03/18 04:48 PM
0

Does that go for unborn babies too?
/r/MensRights14/02/18 11:18 PM
-8

How does this not infringe on people’s religious beliefs?
/r/MensRights14/02/18 03:51 AM
6

Truth bombs!
/r/MensRights12/02/18 12:20 AM
-1

I suppose it’s not really a good comparison because man is being used as a derogatory term and cunt actually is
/r/MensRights19/01/18 04:58 PM
13

Can we make cuntfusing a thing now? Almost to combat the mansplanting
/r/MensRights19/01/18 04:13 PM
1

Nice thanks
/r/MensRights17/01/18 01:08 AM
1

How can i watch this is it on Netflix?
/r/MensRights11/01/18 07:00 PM
3

Has this woman ever watched and episode of snapped?
/r/MensRights11/11/17 06:19 PM
1

This is an issue with most millennials as soon as you present an idea from an opposing standpoint it's is quickly shot down as "hate speech." Any speech that's this different than their own speech is not tolerable and deemed unacceptable in their idea of the ideal society should be.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 03:57 PM
30

Literally the stupidest thing I've ever read. So the oppressed can imagine what it might be like to be the oppressor but the oppressor can't imagine what it would be like being oppressed? If you are one, you have to imagine what it would be like to be the other, you can't be both.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 05:26 PM
1

Lol the irony!
/r/MensRights13/05/17 05:21 PM
1

I'm assuming this is a mock, anyone have source of the female one?
/r/MensRights12/05/17 12:57 AM
23

Or if the genders were reversed it's ok to ruin a boys future.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 10:05 PM
1

Every time I tell someone this they fucking laugh at me and call me crazy
/r/MensRights05/04/17 12:25 AM
1

Again it's not illogical to question the source of information. If a person has a morally questionable occupation it not illogical for questioning their morality. If I see the lightening and hear the thunder I'm not wrong for assuming it's from the same storm.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 05:45 PM
1

It isn't illogical. If the person making the claim has a track record of lying it effects whether or not you believe them. "Wolf wolf cried the boy" and there was a wolf -> fine "Wolf wolf cried the boy" but their was no wolf -> not fine.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 03:59 PM
0

"Aweful person" is subjective. Her primary means of employment is not. The source of employment has no relevance on her ability or inability to create a valid argument, however it's not illogical to discredit the source of one making claims. Calling it illogical is illogical.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 03:34 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter