TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

xNS5 Archive

View 0 posts and 76 comments by xNS5 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

It definitely fits, but I'm glad to see that there are sane people who disagree with them.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 08:00 AM
14

Perhaps, who knows.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 10:55 PM
191

This is shitty, but if you look up the twitter post you can see everyone calling this person out on their bullshit. Edit: I feel that it should also be mentioned that both men and women are calling this person out on their tweet.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 08:41 PM
3

Here's The link to the article, so you can confirm that this pic isn't doctored by the OP.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 07:08 PM
5

According to them, yes. Their argument is that racism and sexism is only existent if a group has a 'power' over another upheld by 'the system'.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 09:09 PM
8

Don't even have to be hot lol
/r/MensRights13/05/19 10:28 PM
18

“It was a drunken act. It was my 21st birthday and it’s not me. I don’t know why I did that and I wasn’t in the right mind frame,” Fry told 9News, who cornered the Brisbane woman outside the office of her former employer, who has since fired her. ...How does that even hold up in court? "Oh I was drunk It's not me"
/r/MensRights13/05/19 08:00 PM
1

In favor of an equally qualified person who happens to be a person of color? I don't see an issue with that, personally. Now if it were someone who was obviously under qualified, then I'd have an issue.
/r/MensRights09/05/19 07:34 PM
1

The only comment I've heard her make is during an award acceptance speech. there's pushing it left right and centre making the film all about that aspect of it. Can you be more specific?
/r/MensRights08/05/19 08:31 PM
-3

People need to create new stories incorporating different races, genders and whatever is culturally relevant at the time. They are. In the UK the other week there was some former Bond Girl on TV saying that the next James Bond after Daniel Craig should be a female. Like WTF? If James Bond's sex is changed then it's no longer James Fucking Bond. Why can't they just create a female version and give their own spin-off. James Bond is a codename lol. At least I'm fairly certain it is, so anyone could…
/r/MensRights08/05/19 08:30 PM
1

Characters are changed, look at Thor for example. They already changed his gender. Wot. I personally hate forced diversity, can’t we just create new stuff? As do I, but I also value the ideas that someone different than me has. It doesn't have to be forced, but it should be encouraged. Look at Black Panther, I‘m sure there are a shit ton of black superheroes that aren’t used for movies. I'd kill for a Static Shock movie. That cartoon was the shit when I was a kid.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 08:09 PM
1

Lmao plenty of people are offended by the idea because they think that she's anti-white men. She can bitch and moan about diversity, it's funny to see her getting spanked by the same rod. Is the mere fact that she brought it up her "bitching and moaning"? Black Panther was decent for example. Story wise it wasn't all that new, but you have to admit the graphics, costumes and art were fantastic. Combining traditional African clothing/art with a modern flair and HOVER SHIPS!
/r/MensRights08/05/19 08:07 PM
2

What about when it comes to coding? It's pretty universal idea to have someone take a look at your code before finalizing it, right? It's a good idea to have a different perspective on certain things, like trying to optimize certain areas to reduce runtime and/or memory consumption. It's the same concept for pretty much any industry. In Hollywood, someone from a different background than a director who went to UCLA full ride might have different stories to tell/ways of doing things movie wise.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 08:04 PM
1

But they kind of go hand in hand. If some independent filmmaker has a great idea for a movie and just happens to be a person of color/a woman then great! Choosing an iffy idea based on sex/race is shitty. Different races/sexes have different perspectives on how the world works, don't you agree?
/r/MensRights08/05/19 08:00 PM
17

...am I the only one who doesn't see an issue with more diversity in certain industries? Obviously choosing based on race and sex is really stupid, but wouldn't having more people with different backgrounds help an industry like the movie industry? Hell, instead of making remakes of older movies, maybe someone can come up with something original.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 05:49 PM
2

Oh I 100% agree, don't get me wrong. In some cases I get why, it's shitty and I hate it, but I get why is all I'm saying.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 06:04 PM
-4

It would be sexual assault. But I think it's ultimately up to the court to press rape charges, right?
/r/MensRights03/05/19 05:58 PM
-1

Yeah that too. Honestly of all the articles I've seen involving an adult female teacher raping a kid, whenever I hear the word "rape" my go-to thought is she penetrated him in some way. But that isn't necessarily the case though so it's partly just the way I've seen the word used on the internet and real life. Rape in the United States is defined by the Department of Justice as "Penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex or…
/r/MensRights03/05/19 05:58 PM
-24

Eh. The legal definition of rape is "forcible penetration" so I can kind of get why most situations like this don't use the word "rape". I don't like it one bit, but I kind of understand.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 05:35 PM
4

As MEN we don't censor. Wot. Says who?
/r/MensRights29/04/19 05:13 AM
4

To play the devils advocate, if they had ended it with "It's his fault for thinking he could abuse someone like that" the entire post would have been more sane.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 05:12 AM
3

Is this man a god?
/r/MensRights13/03/19 01:34 AM
1

PM'd! Thanks :)
/r/MensRights13/03/19 01:33 AM
16

At the moment I'm probably going to be hunting for internships because I'm not super far in my major. For Interns, would that also apply?
/r/MensRights13/03/19 12:55 AM
36

Define "blew everyone out of the water"? (I'm a CS student and I'm just curious)
/r/MensRights13/03/19 12:47 AM
1

Damn straight you did.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 10:41 PM
1

Did you even read the article dipshit? The number was published in a popular mothering magazine in an article written by pediatrician Dr. Paul Fleiss (“The Case Against Circumcision” by Paul M. Fleiss, MD, published in Mothering: The Magazine of Natural Family Living, Winter 1997, pp. 36-45). Dr. Fleiss has been campaigning against routine neonatal (newborn and infant) circumcisions for years. He is also a strong advocate of breastfeeding and a medical advisor to La Leche League, the internation…
/r/MensRights24/01/19 07:00 PM
1

You started off by saying the discussion shouldn't be a thing. I argued otherwise, and you proceeded to use slippery slope arguments to justify your "stance". As it goes, circumcision isn't as bad as having your appendix or kidney. Why what? Your arguments are shit. If you don't think any of this is relevant, why are you having this conversation with me? I just posted a link saying that the "20,000 nerve endings" isn't entirely accurate due to a lack of research and you started spouting off.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 06:01 PM
1

It's you who aren't getting it. Circumsision is far less invasive than removing an internal organ. I'm in no way saying it should happen, but your arguments are total shit. Even people who aren't religious have their kids circumcized. It's not exclusive to the religious.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 04:41 PM
1

That's exactly what a slippery slope argument is. "Why not just cut out [organ] while we're at it seeing as we're cutting up people!" Discussing how many nerve endings it has is completely irrelevant. It's relevant to this thread lol. Edit: From wikipedia A slippery slope argument...is a consequentialist logical device in which a party asserts that a relatively small first step leads to a chain of related events culminating in some significant (usually negative) effect
/r/MensRights24/01/19 04:19 PM
1

Stupid argument. I agree with you that circumcision is wholly unnecessary, but using slippery slope arguments is just pathetic. The fact of the matter is, circumcision is very much a thing in the world today. Not talking about it is stupid and nothing will change if we don't have this conversation.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 04:07 PM
2

Saying [x] shouldn't be a thing doesn't change squat. "Rape shouldn't be a thing!" "Poverty shouldn't be a thing!" "Murder shouldn't be a thing!" "Theft shouldn't be a thing!" This article essentially says that there aren't really any studies saying that the 20,000 figure is true. It's a thing whether you like it or not and it's an important conversation to have.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 03:46 PM
2

I would argue that the link I posted is somewhat unbiased There are still other studies, but again, not a single one actually gives an average count. And again, there is some skepticism that the number is a pure exaggeration and not even based on scientific studies, especially the last number in the statement that has recently been quoted: 20,000 to 70,000 nerve endings on an average foreskin.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 03:25 PM
1

Then what's the point of your comment lol.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 03:07 PM
35

http://thecircumcisiondecision.com/20000-nerve-endings/
/r/MensRights24/01/19 06:53 AM
1

Holy intrusive ads, Batman!
/r/MensRights24/12/18 04:39 AM
2

I mean, if they are equally qualified as males I don't see this as an issue. If they're just being chosen based on their sex (while being less qualified), booooooo
/r/MensRights26/11/18 09:13 PM
0

Honestly couldn't give a shit. Edit: If you're seriously upset about this, you really need to re-think your priorities. This is about as important as man-spreading.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 01:17 AM
1

It isn't, but they end up doing it anyway so why not?
/r/MensRights18/10/17 06:02 PM
6

Then maybe you should set the record straight. Make this a chance to own what happened. It's fucked up, it happened, but the lies that were spread isn't what happened.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 04:05 AM
2

Shit. Might talk to someone with your carrier. I was able to recover some lost text messages by digging through my file system.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 04:02 AM
10

Hey man I'm sorry that happened. I was in a similar position a few years ago. Give it time, and you need to allow yourself to heal. Sounds weird, right? I was in a bad place, close to suicidal. I realized that I was in a constant loop of "why did that happen to me. How could this happen?" And so on. I had to change my mindset to "this happened. Nothing is going to change that."
/r/MensRights05/09/17 02:15 AM
2

If you havent deleted your old backups, they might be still on your computer if you dig a bit.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 02:08 AM
3

Bowel movement, did you mean?
/r/MensRights16/08/17 02:18 PM
1

This review isn't all about dunkirk's lack of diversity. The mentioning of it sounds more like an afterthought. People are going to be butthurt either way, with or without that mention.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 03:07 AM
1

What if it were to tell the more sensitive that there won't be enough diversity to their standards? I'm sure you've seen how many nowadays are adding how diverse a movie is to their criteria.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 09:06 PM
1

Clearly you haven't been paying attention to the dumbass social media posts where someone gets offended by the tiniest thing. One person on Twitter is getting a shit ton of hate for saying something along the lines of "Chester Bennington deserved to die because he's a racist for having rap in his songs" (even though most of Linkin Park is Asian and Mike Shinoda is half Japanese).
/r/MensRights24/07/17 07:25 PM
1

So we're fucked either way. Lovely.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 11:19 PM
3

What about in situations where both parties are drunk?
/r/MensRights20/07/17 07:37 AM
6

REEEEEEEE MISOGYNY
/r/MensRights31/05/17 07:45 PM
1

If you think that's my angle 😜
/r/MensRights17/04/17 04:51 AM
-1

Right, haha my bad. Haven't had my morning coffee. The body has stopped producing enough melanin to produce darker hair, which means any color period is not natural.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 04:21 PM
-2

But if a man or woman in their 50's were to color their hair a darker color due to age, that would mean their hair is losing it's ability to produce enough keratin to make darker hair. Which means for them, dark hair is unnatural.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 03:52 PM
-9

...By that definition people shouldn't color their hair if they're going white. It's natural to go white, right?
/r/MensRights16/04/17 07:33 AM
6

K
/r/PussyPass24/02/17 04:12 AM
-6

Imo that's a little extreme. He has the same power to withhold sex from her. It's going too far to equate sex to doing chores and paychecks. Edit: lol y'all are sad fuckers.
/r/TheRedPill04/12/16 07:46 PM
2

I can smell the bullshit from here in California. And might I say, it is staaaaaaaaaaaanky
/r/MensRights03/09/16 06:20 AM
3

The sarcasm is strong with this one. Edit: strong* not wrong. Mobile is weird af.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 07:29 PM
43

sigh You're fucking kidding me.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 07:14 AM
2

Shit, my bad.
/r/MensRights23/05/16 07:16 PM
0

The one on the right was taken in 2014 and the one on the left was taken in 2015 2013. edit: 2013. My bad :P
/r/MensRights23/05/16 02:57 AM
3

Seems like women want to put themselves in the spotlight to take away from men's issues.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 01:56 AM
1

Seems like the mother and whoever wrote the article was jumping to the racism card really quickly.
/r/MensRights07/05/16 02:46 AM
1

Not necessarily a misplaced or excessive admiration for a particular person or thing. "a cult of personality surrounding the leaders"
/r/MensRights06/05/16 05:05 PM
2

Oh wow you chose one fucking instance and used it as a blanket for all domestic violence. I never said that. As you can see, all I said was: HM.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 12:20 AM
4

In the same way a man might endure more minor domestic violence Hm. minor domestic violence https://imgur.com/gallery/SVtEl I am sure the numbers aren't wrong, but I would find it safe to assume that when a male attacks a female, she is going to get the worse end of that exchange. HM.
/r/MensRights02/05/16 10:48 PM
2

It really depends on the degree to which your opinions are stated. In the case of this article, she apparently took it to the extreme and she was fired as a result. I personally wouldn't want anyone spewing any form of hate speech in any business I would run. All of it is opinion, but if it's degrading/calling for the harm of someone else, that's too far.
/r/MensRights11/04/16 05:04 PM
1

So either way I'm fucked! Sweeeeeeeet -_-
/r/MensRights07/04/16 05:53 AM
1

That's what it'll look like, but that'll be up to the judge to decide. Under California’s new law, revenge porn is a misdemeanor, punishable by up to six months in jail, a fine of up to $1,000, or both. To be honest, I'd rather that than being labeled as a rapist and sentenced to more jail time simply because some crazy woman decided to cry wolf.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 05:18 AM
1

That's such bullshit. Not the suing part, but it being a prisonable offense? Jesus. I'd honestly rather have video evidence to protect myself against potential rape claims. Do you by chance have any articles on this?
/r/MensRights07/04/16 04:42 AM
8

Well in this specific case, I agree it wouldn't prove that she wasn't drunk. This would be in situations where she regretted it after the fact and decided to claim rape.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 05:46 PM
19

That, or you could just hide cameras and audio recorders around the room. "HE RAPED ME" "My video and audio says otherwise lol"
/r/MensRights06/04/16 04:57 PM
2

...after all of that, I still have no idea what she meant by "white male privilege." Does anyone have a hitchhikers guide to feminism laying around?
/r/MensRights20/03/16 05:27 AM
1

Oh shit I missed that bit. My bad.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 07:34 AM
1

...What would it take to change the legislation? To something like...making it illegal for anyone over the age of 18 to have intercourse with someone under, but legal for teens from 16-18. That way, teens are protected from adults who can't keep it in their pants and aren't prosecuted by these laws when it's 100% consensual.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 07:57 AM
2

Feminists say they are an equality movement not just for females therefore based on that self definition they should be caring about and working to fix pre existing male issues. Weeelll Yes and no. The way I see it, they think that by solving women's rights we can solve mens rights. Are they fighting for true equality? No. Honestly, the entire "movement" is a mess. Too many women shouting different things. There isn't a direction.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 07:24 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter