TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

xafimrev Archive

View 0 posts and 93 comments by xafimrev on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

This article is biologically ignorant. If you agree to sex with a man without a condom. You are going to get semen in you whether he ejaculates or not.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 10:20 AM
28

In most of the US a 16 year old can consent. Just not with a teacher.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 12:01 AM
1

I can't be the only one who thought "bye son, momma has to work, love you". And felt a bit sad.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 02:53 AM
0

You almost got me. I was just about to reply "speaking as a parent.....". Then I saw the /s
/r/MensRights10/06/13 02:46 AM
25

As a father who plays dolly dress up with my daughter and niece. I'm pretty sure your ignorance is showing.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 04:22 PM
-1

It is called concern trolling.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 02:35 PM
2

School shootings are pretty rare.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 10:55 AM
1

For elective ones. Legally, yes.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 07:42 AM
1

As can the doctor.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 07:41 AM
1

Well. A doctor who performs elective abortions on minors could certainly legally require her guardian's consent. They just don't.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 07:38 AM
2

It doesn't work how you think it does. The doctor can ask you to share this elective procedure with your spouse. If you choose to do so , you have consented. If you don't he won't consent to the procedure. There is no duress and no violation.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 07:24 AM
0

It isn't unjust. And many doctors won't give an elective tubal ligations for many reasons. Too young, not married, married with no kids. Completely legal and just for them to set boundaries on what they will do in for elective procedures.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 07:20 AM
1

They can and do for elective procedures. If you say no, they do not perform the procedure.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 07:15 AM
1

I can't even form a cohesive thought......Its MRA's fault that men are getting the shaft in the courts. WHAT THE FUCK! The amount of cognitive denial is amazing.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 12:22 AM
2

The lotus birth has zero impact on whether you havea belly button or not. It is formed by the cord drying up and falling off regardless of whether the cord is cut an inch away from the belly or not. That said even if it did.have an effect, it would still not be a valid comparison. I think this person thinks they divot the cord off of you when they cut it.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 12:30 AM
2

So three of your juatifications are completely wrong (cleaner, easier, and more pleasurable). Your fourth justification is the good old everyone I know is jumping off the bridge so I'll do it too excuse.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 12:10 AM
2

Sorta like your supposed benefits which are as rare in occurance if not more so.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 12:03 AM
6

Who it's everyone else, circ rates are at 50% of newborns now in the US.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 11:51 PM
12

It takes roughly the same amount of time to clean cut and uncut penises. Any one claiming it is for hygiene is either ignorant or lying.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 11:49 PM
2

I can only speak to the one job I worked as a print room operator, the severance was part of the hiring agreement, due to me on separation so long as I had worked at least a year.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 07:20 PM
1

They can legally say good things about you. Generally they legally can't say bad things.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 12:41 PM
3

Generally they can't withhold your severance, doesn't stop them threatening. Now if your position normally isn't offered severance and this is a special one off then yeah they generally have you over a barrel.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 12:39 PM
0

I'm curious. Was their family home in Monaco and the kids were always there, or did he take the kids back to Monaco.without her permission.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 09:57 PM
8

What percentage of romance authors are male I wonder.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 04:37 PM
3

Three most influential conventions in geekdom? Really? The only one I possibly agree with is DefCon. PAX and Comicon easily replace the other two in terms of influence.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 04:31 PM
2

Of course it isn't an excuse, pay attention. It is however the likely reason that women have a higher incident of abusing a child.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 04:22 AM
0

Its true, but women are also more often the careperson for children. So ya know gender roles and stuff.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 10:57 PM
2

I've told my 4 year old daughter loudly "Sweetie, we don't talk to disgusting perverts" when this happened to us. Some whackjob lady kneeled down and started asking my daughter questions.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 10:56 AM
1

That is bs, I'm sure the UK has a law against interfering with emergency personel and that is just what she was doing.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 01:03 AM
7

Nobody should be ashamed of watching a tv show.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 10:04 PM
5

Sounds like we've got an SRS false flag or game of trolls troll here, just stop responding.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 10:02 PM
17

You mean all the posts downvoted by 30+ people?
/r/MensRights28/08/12 08:17 PM
1

New schools in New York can only offer girls sports? Wha? How is that even justifiable.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 11:42 PM
2

So long as they have a baby changing table in both I don't think I particularly care.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 11:36 PM
3

Yes especially since women's restrooms in retail locations are always completely destroyed. So now they can destroy ALL THE RESTROOMS! Yes it is a joke, but just ask any retail employee if they would rather clean the men's or ladies' bathroom.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 11:24 PM
5

A man must have driven her to it right cnn?
/r/MensRights07/08/12 12:32 PM
2

Absolutely.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 01:22 AM
6

After listening to it he was indeed silly about not washing his genitals, but he was correct that the pediatrician should handle the case of whether he has scabbing issues with his circumcision.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 11:20 PM
27

In the US it is illegal to take your child out of the state much less the country without informing the other parent. Get a better lawyer.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 09:38 PM
1

How does small penis or neckbeard imply fat?
/r/MensRights26/07/12 09:33 AM
3

Shooting. Women are better in general at riflery.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 05:47 AM
8

From my admittedly anecdotal experience, I've met more transphobic feminists (especially concerned with m->f transfolk) than MRA transphobes.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 11:55 PM
3

Most cut guys still have a little foreskin and we have to follow the same procedure anyway so the only difference is more foreskin to pull back. Didn't have my son done will encourage my kids not to do it to my grandsons when/if that happens.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 11:32 PM
-1

So you admit you are actually more of a criminal than the guy who made the comment with our limited information. Yes he is an asshole, but you are a criminal in waiting with self described poor impulse control. How do you not see that of you truly believe you would act this way that you are not the worse human being.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 10:15 PM
0

I'm pretty sure the person you were talking to was a troll simply by the use of transmisogynistic (huh?) and ableist (which there was no indication of).
/r/MensRights10/07/12 01:08 AM
1

Yes it does, and the specific example example you quoted is. You might be thinking about promoting violence against a specific individual. It doesn't matter that normal people find the speech abhorrent.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 01:20 PM
0

Not at all I think the videos were given very little examination in general. A very shallow and poor piece attempting and failing to meaningfully address an important issue.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 11:03 PM
2

Is Prince Charming allowed to punch his (female) monsters in the jaw? Immaterial to my discussion about the inclusion of the KP vid and the title of the article. The title of the blog post wasn't "KP hits a man how unfair what a double standard"
/r/MensRights05/07/12 06:48 PM
1

Did you miss the point where he crossed his fingers behind his back indicating he was not a 'Prince Charming'. He was just the last monster the labyrinth tossed against her before she helped her younger self escape. This doesn't imply that all men are monsters either before anyone jumps to that incorrect conclusion. Never mind the fact that the Prince Charming story is a horrible gender stereotype for both women and men. I used stupidly because the title is "How Katy Perry and the rest of the wo…
/r/MensRights05/07/12 05:35 PM
1

The whole 'there is never a reason to hit X' is a false tautology statement regardless of whatever X is. There are plenty of reasons, not all of them are good, but some are. You know the old saying, "there's NEVER a reason to hit a woman." If that is so, then there should never be a reason to hit a man. Both statements are incorrect. Back to your first question: So, do you think punching someone who betrayed you is OK. Potentially yes, in the scope of the fictional story in the video certainly. …
/r/MensRights05/07/12 04:31 PM
3

A lot of the other vids were pretty egregious, the Katy Perry one wasn't, nor was it intended to be humorous. My feeling is the Katy Perry vid weakens the article's point because it really isn't sexist violence, it is just punching someone who betrayed her. It also doesn't support their headline of people finding violence again men funny (they do, but her vid doesn't support this).
/r/MensRights05/07/12 03:02 PM
7

This has been my view of this subreddit as well. I suspect that he is basing his opinion on some down voted troll posts he read.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 09:27 AM
4

It might be regional. In my 40 years this is the first time I've ever seen someone complain about the word female as a noun and in all places an MRA subreddit. It certainly isn't an overly clinical word in the Midwest of the US. It sounds like prescriptivist grammar nitpicking.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 09:12 AM
1

I agree
/r/MensRights14/05/12 10:41 PM
12

I see this as a bit sexist. You aren't being "mother", you're still father just fathering twice as hard.
/r/MensRights14/05/12 12:38 AM
3

I wonder if they linked to the wrong article.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 04:01 PM
2

There are other things they can refuse female sterilization for. My friend went through 4 obgyns who wouldn't tie her tubes because a) she wasn't married and/or b) she was too young.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 03:23 PM
2

Except it doesn't, they just won't perform this elective procedure on you if you are married and don't consent to have your partner there. It is ridiculous but still. You can choose to not inform your spouse (as per HIPAA) but then they choose not to do this procedure (also legal). http://my.clevelandclinic.org/services/vasectomy/hic_vasectomy.aspx You and your wife or partner will be required to sign a request for sterilization. It will state that you understand vasectomy, its potential risks, …
/r/MensRights15/04/12 04:07 AM
2

Oddly enough my hospital requires the wife (and husband) to sign a sheet saying they've been informed about all.the possible outcomes. This is different from any other non-transplant surgery. I can have bypass surgery without my wife singing for anything, but not a vasectomy.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 11:34 PM
5

1 isn't defined in the law 2 should be shared payment 3-6 aren't something that would be done in the first 15 days especially if the mother is trying to sidestep your rights and adopt out the baby.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 07:10 PM
3

Not to mention her thinking no blazer = mediocrity.
/r/MensRights31/03/12 06:00 AM
3

Back the f up?
/r/MensRights27/03/12 06:21 PM
6

Yes even including the costs of college and the much lower 4 years of income you would have had in not having a degree. There are some wunderkind exceptions who go it themselves without a degree, but for most people a degree (that isn't in gender studies or a similar non job field) will more than pay for itself over their career.
/r/MensRights26/02/12 03:34 AM
11

This if flat out wrong, college degrees are statistically more likely to raise your income.
/r/MensRights26/02/12 01:51 AM
3

Your mean the thread posted by an srs sock puppet who then edited it to make r/MR look bad. Yeah totally.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 01:43 AM
1

Mensrights has a bad reputation because there are a lot of misandrists/white knigts on reddit. More so than any misogynistic postings from supposed members
/r/MensRights13/02/12 05:53 AM
3

Aka an elaborate social event where courtship rituals are mimicked. :)
/r/MensRights24/01/12 10:31 PM
1

Uh...I'm pretty sure they have nothing to do with incest. Normal Father Daugher dances happen all the time just without the sexual repression message. Nothing wrong at all with those.
/r/MensRights24/01/12 09:01 PM
1

Controlling mother in law I'm guessing.
/r/MensRights30/12/11 12:03 AM
1

Even non botched surgery can lead to infection, amputation, sepsis and/or death.
/r/MensRights30/12/11 12:02 AM
1

Circumcised boys have to be taught to clean under their foreskin just like uncircumcised boys. The only difference is the amount of foreskin they have to pull back. Cleanliness is only an issue with either type if you are a poor parent.
/r/MensRights29/12/11 11:59 PM
1

It is at this point that I would just take my daughter.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 01:19 PM
6

Honestly, if your reasoning is: "I am, so they shall be" that is pretty poor justification.
/r/MensRights15/12/11 10:55 AM
1

Even so, she should be the one who stays home from work, not him.
/r/MensRights23/11/11 07:22 PM
0

I wouldn't want to be in your amount of pain and your situation sucks with regards to your medical ins. But "disfigured" seems a bit strong of a word for a scar on your scrotum. Perhaps I misread something but it isn't like the old tea sack wasn't already the prettiest of objects.
/r/MensRights19/11/11 11:29 PM
2

Rachel gets paired with Mr S and she gets a crush on him, shows up at his house minor subplot about the last girl who had a crush on him and went bananas. Rachel ends up moving on.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 03:29 AM
4

They already did that in the first? season with Rachel and Mr. Schuester.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 02:29 AM
5

It is dishonest, and I would rather not be in a relationship with a dishonest person.
/r/MensRights06/11/11 01:23 AM
2

I would just kidnap my child back, and go to Canada if I had to.
/r/MensRights09/09/11 08:15 PM
14

Saying hello is polite. Something polite people do. Ignoring it is rude. They are just trying to justify their own rudeness by making it the "creepy" male's fault.
/r/MensRights06/08/11 01:26 PM
2

Most strip clubs allow what amounts to the stripper dry humping you in the private dances very few clubs are look no touch. It's usually you look she touches. And while not most, many dancers allow light touching especially if you aren't a jackass about it.
/r/MensRights31/07/11 11:35 PM
3

What is interesting to me is she is basically a misandrist. The best explanation replaced man and woman in the elevator with black and white.
/r/MensRights09/07/11 11:28 PM
2

Lots of rationalizing women being sexist in those comments.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 09:50 PM
1

Ohio, USA. By the way.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 03:10 AM
1

Yup I get asked this at every dr appointment as does my wife. "Has any one physically abused me and do I feel safe in my own home?"
/r/MensRights30/06/11 03:09 AM
3

Right to insist sure. But no right to actually have one. It instead falls under reasonable accommodation if member of said sex is available.
/r/MensRights13/06/11 03:12 PM
2

Yes but they are not retroactively imprisoning anyone which is what your headline stated. They were sentenced under the existing law at the time. If they were to be released because the law was changed the law would be retroactively applied. I feel they should retroactively apply the new sentencing laws and release them, bur your headline is still wrong.
/r/MensRights26/05/11 12:49 AM
1

Misleading headline. They aren't applying the law retroactively to let them out. In this situation, retroactively is a good thing.
/r/MensRights25/05/11 09:54 PM
0

The responses here sound like people without children. It is completely normal in the US for either parent to kiss their preteen child on the lips. Generally as the child gets older it migrates to being a kiss on the cheek. It is not creepy or gross or sexual in any way.
/r/MensRights01/04/11 10:18 AM
7

In what way? The only description that has been posted is of a non-sexual situation. The "report" to law enforcement will probably be binned as soon as law enforcement views it.
/r/MensRights23/03/11 02:23 AM
14

Parent post shouldn't be getting down votes but answers. If kloo seriously considered locking the forum permanently over the actions of one poster, perhaps he has lost his perspective as a mod.
/r/MensRights23/03/11 12:10 AM
1

You're reading your own bias into what he said. He wasn't bringing up her past behavior to say it is her own fault for being assaulted. He brought it up (and he said this if you read it) to point out that Clinton made a poor choice im choosing an alledged sexual harasser to champion.
/r/MensRights22/02/11 09:54 PM
1

Except in most of the country he is old enough to consent to sex with someone aged 18 or older.
/r/MensRights08/02/11 10:25 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter