TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

xaivteev Archive

View 1 post and 64 comments by xaivteev on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
94

xaivteev/r/MensRights28/08/16 01:48 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Well, that's not all I'm looking for. Inheritance was just what was specified by the previous commenter. I'm also looking for the other ways in which people (specifically women) accumulate wealth. In order for OP to make the claim that "only 2% of the world's most wealthy women didn't get that way by taking a man's self-made fortune from him" they have to show that a sufficient number of women didn't accumulate their wealth another way. The article does nothing to support this claim. The only 2%…
/r/FeminismStopsWhen23/09/19 10:34 PM
4

It matters because the implication is that most women on the Rich List don't deserve the wealth they have because they didn't make it themselves. If it was seen that men and women inherit wealth at similar rates, or men inherited it more often, then all the people jumping to conclusions from this article (like the OP) can't say that these women don't deserve their wealth, or must instead concede that those men don't deserve it either. In either case, it stops being about sex, and instead becomes…
/r/FeminismStopsWhen23/09/19 08:49 PM
8

So there's 1000 people on the list. It doesn't mention men. It talks about the rich in general, and women. It makes no mention of how many men inherited/won their wealth. It makes no mention of the other ways people, or specifically women, make their wealth besides what was in the title. To make claims attacking women for taking wealth based on this article is completely irresponsible, or intellectually dishonest. The claim the OP makes in the title is just completely unfounded.
/r/MensRights23/09/19 06:21 PM
19

This is useless without context. How many people are on the Rich List? How many men have inherited/won their wealth? What are the other ways people get on the Rich List? It says "most have inherited or won millions from divorce." What other ways are there? Without the other ways you can't actually claim "FSW only 2% of the world's most wealthy women didn't get that way by taking a man's self-made fortune from him"
/r/FeminismStopsWhen23/09/19 06:00 PM
8

This is useless without context. How many people are on the Rich List? How many men have inherited/won their wealth? What are the other ways people get on the Rich List? It says "most have inherited or won millions from divorce." What other ways are there? Without the other ways you can't actually claim "FSW only 2% of the world's most wealthy women didn't get that way by taking a man's self-made fortune from him"
/r/MensRights23/09/19 05:58 PM
3

Ok, one more, because you are still failing to be intellectually honest, and/or fail to understand how fucking stupid you sound. I understand your call to action was to fix the feminist movement. I'm now asking you for LOGICAL CONSISTENCY. For EQUALITY. If you generalize the moral call to action you've made, it becomes, "If a movement you're a part of is shit, fix it if you care about it." I then applied this to men's rights. How are you going to ask feminists to fix their own movement when it g…
/r/MensRights16/09/19 11:53 PM
2

Ok. I'm done being charitable, and I'm done responding after this. You're not intellectually competent or honest enough to have this conversation. How have I come here with "the mob?" Do you see how far downvoted I am? You do realize how hypocritical you sound right. Telling people to "fix the movement you care so much about" and then criticizing someone for trying to do that because it's your movement and not the movement you intended. I'd imagine the same thing happens to these 'moderates' who…
/r/MensRights16/09/19 11:40 PM
2

You're the one being dishonest here, not me and if you want to talk about skipping over, you ignored my point about how those issues you tried to dismiss were actually important. I wasn't going to address you until you addressed me, since you've been ignoring what I've been saying and talking past me this whole time. And you've still failed to respond completely, since you've failed to show how your original post shows your so called 'original point'. If my understanding is correct (which it is …
/r/MensRights16/09/19 10:38 PM
1

HOLY SHIT. PLEASE TELL ME YOU'RE A TROLL! I asked you a series of yes or no questions to make sure I understood your point. Like an intellectually honest person would. I then asked you to prove the thing you claimed in your last comment, because my understanding of what you posted doesn't lead to that conclusion (your so called original point). AND YOU SKIPPED OVER IT ALL! Please tell me you're trolling. It has to be that. Dude you got me if you did. We can laugh about this if you want. But if y…
/r/MensRights16/09/19 10:17 PM
1

Most things relating to feminism is by definition related to men's rights. Define feminism, and define men's rights.
/r/MensRights16/09/19 10:11 PM
2

there's more than say 1500 upvotes there's always a bunch of whining cretins who present themselves as 'moderates' complaining about how it's only a 'few' feminists who behave the way we describe even though we literally post hundreds of examples on an almost bi-weekly basis. It's either feminists having temper tantrums over being criticised, not getting their way in life or they're going apeshit over something perfectly normal that doesn't harm anyone in any way. Short version => There's lots o…
/r/MensRights16/09/19 10:07 PM
1

you're asking me that question because you want examples of censorship on this particular sub. That doesn't happen here because the mods here don't censor people often solely for their viewpoints. THAT'S LITERALLY THE POINT OF MY ORIGINAL POST. I SAID "If anything, this should be the place to have a discussion on men's rights. The thing blocking this discussion on this sub is the fact that this sub is FILLED with much more popular posts that do nothing to talk about men's rights, and instead tra…
/r/MensRights16/09/19 08:19 PM
-12

I'm sorry, do the AgainstMensRights moderators run this sub too. That's news to me. Now take a look at the top 3 posts in this sub. None of them are about men's rights. All of them are about Feminism.
/r/MensRights16/09/19 08:10 PM
-12

Name 1 feminist who is stopping discussion of men's rights on this sub.
/r/MensRights16/09/19 08:06 PM
-19

Ok, I'll bite. Maybe it has more to do with constantly trashing feminists on a sub that's supposedly about talking about men's rights. Most of the posts that get upvoted are about hating on feminists or some random nobody's twitter/tumblr, but the posts about actual issues get way less attention. If anything, this should be the place to have a discussion on men's rights. The thing blocking this discussion on this sub is the fact that this sub is FILLED with much more popular posts that do nothin…
/r/MensRights16/09/19 07:53 PM
1

So... not a false accusation? Then Nope. Where is the title mentioned? Nowhere. They asked if it was false, then someone claimed it wasn't. It was a false accusation. Now go bother someone else in a relevant comment chain if you want to talk about the title.
/r/MensRights03/11/18 02:43 PM
1

Ok. But the claim by the person i responded to has nothing to do with the title and whether or not it's misleading. It is entirely about whether or not the accusation is true or false. The comment then falsely asserts that the accusation wasn't false. I then responded to that and only that. If you want to talk about the title being misleading, respond to a relevant comment chain, or make your own.
/r/MensRights03/11/18 02:09 PM
1

Ok, you clearly didn't read the comment i responded to, so I'm done wasting my time with you.
/r/MensRights03/11/18 01:34 PM
1

Ok. Read the comment i responded to, and then tell me why the title is relevant
/r/MensRights03/11/18 01:13 PM
2

Ok, but the accusation is still false. If someone rapes someone else, it doesn't mean they've raped everyone.
/r/MensRights03/11/18 12:15 PM
3

Well, technically yes. If it wasn't her and the claim was that it was her, it's false.
/r/MensRights03/11/18 10:56 AM
1

Ok... but the man in this scenario is still the rapist/murderer...
/r/MensRights22/09/18 07:03 PM
1

Have I offended you?
/r/MensRights05/12/17 02:21 PM
1

You haven't even disagreed yet.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 01:23 PM
1

Please reread my comment, and respond with something relevant
/r/MensRights04/12/17 08:19 PM
2

The only reason feminists have listened to you speak about mens rights is because you have blamed MEN for their own problems. I fail to see how I've blamed men for feminists' problems when arguing that a man should be able to give up financial responsibility for a child if a woman chooses to keep it. I fail to see how I've blamed men for feminists' problems when arguing that alimony is outdated and immoral. I fail to see how I've blamed men for feminists' problems when correcting them on pay gap…
/r/MensRights04/12/17 01:44 PM
2

No. That's not how this works. The burden of proof is on you. If you wish to claim that everyone who exists as a Feminist today will behave in a certain way, without proof (not proof that some, or many, or most, but all will act in a certain way), then I am under no obligation to prove you wrong. Only you are under any obligation to provide proof.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 01:33 PM
2

Your problem is that you think we haven't tied that before. At no point have I stated that you haven't tried it before. As soon as you veer of the feminist path or question a core tenet of feminism you're gone. They won't listen. That's just a lie. Not everyone is a faceless name on an online forum, or a celebrity built on flash and not substance. I'm living proof it's possible to speak about men's rights and have Feminists listen, I've done it. It is not MRAs you need to tell this stuff to, it'…
/r/MensRights04/12/17 01:20 PM
1

I never claimed, "Feminism hasn't infringed on men's rights". I asked how this post relates to the infringement of men's rights. Teacher: "What did the bully do to you, Billy?" Billy: "He punched me, kicked me, and he didn't do his chores at home." The bully is bullying Billy, but not everything the bully does wrong is bullying Billy.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 01:09 PM
1

Ok, so if I understand you correctly. Your claim is that this demonization leads to the infringement of men's rights, but the demonization itself isn't an infringement of men's rights. This is very different from your first post.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 04:57 AM
-1

So you're claiming that it is a man's right to not be lied about, and it is this right that's being infringed upon? Edit: Downvote me if you want. But if you don't respond, it's because you know I'm right. All I did was ask a clarifying question to see how this comment relates to men's rights. I inferred that's what the comment was about based on the subject at hand.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 04:05 AM
1

Yes it is. Perhaps I'm misunderstanding your point. But, are you claiming that it's a right to not be demonized, and that it's this right that has been infringed upon?
/r/MensRights04/12/17 04:01 AM
2

I've never claimed that MRA's only care about men. I made the argument that this particular post has nothing to do with men's rights. Which it doesn't. While MRA's might care about women, men, and may be against many aspects of Feminism, what MRA's care about has nothing to do with whether or not this post has anything to do with men's rights. MRA's are people, men's rights are moral entitlements. I'm not saying, nor have I ever said, "Don't criticize Feminism," or "Feminism hasn't done anything…
/r/MensRights04/12/17 03:58 AM
2

Not all of them do. Sometimes all it takes is a conversation. Sometimes all it takes is meeting them in a space that's not built to be Feminism vs MRA's. Sometimes all it takes is not being condescending, defensive, or snarky. Very rarely do people wake up in the morning and think to themselves, "I want to be a morally bad person." More often than not, they're just misinformed, mislead, or have only acted on their intuitions. Being hostile towards these people isn't going to change their minds. …
/r/MensRights04/12/17 03:20 AM
0

I never made the argument that Feminists haven't done anything to harm men. I made the argument that this particular post has nothing to do with Men's Rights. Which it doesn't. If you have a bottle of whiskey, it's worth something. If you mix that bottle of whiskey with a barrel of water, it's worth nothing.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 03:09 AM
8

Ok... you literally just spent your entire post not actually addressing my comment.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 03:05 AM
1

Ok, I'm done responding to you past this point. It's clear you can't actually make a rational argument for how the post relates in any way to Men's Rights. Being able to communicate and articulate your ideas is an important skill especially with those who disagree with you. I don't think Feminists are right about everything, in the same way I don't think they're wrong about everything. Communicating with them, is the only way things move forward. I'm trying to save men and women. People like you…
/r/MensRights03/12/17 07:28 PM
9

In other words. The post has nothing to do with Men's Rights, and while there are arguments to be made for criticizing Feminism, none of them are included in the original post, so it has no reason for being on the sub.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 07:05 PM
7

I'm assuming the "it" you're referring to is Feminism. In which case the post still makes no sense even taking a broad view of Men's Rights. It's like writing a restaurant review, complaining about the management, then throwing in that the manager is a horrible parent to their children too. Even though it fits with criticizing the manager, it still makes no sense to include it given the context.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 07:02 PM
10

Ok... what part of the post refers to Feminism harming men or boys?
/r/MensRights03/12/17 06:53 PM
297

Ok... but what does this have to do, in any way, with Men's Rights? Edit: To clarify. I have not, nor have I ever claimed that "Feminism shouldn't be critiqued" or that "Feminism hasn't done anything to infringe on men's rights." I have only asked what this particular post has to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 05:42 PM
1

shouldn't your first line be: Description X of a subset of group Y ≠ All of group Y fit description X.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 01:41 PM
1

I would even say that it's fine even if the women don't have another major to choose, because they don't have to choose to go to college. If they decide they value college more than they dislike the jokes and advances, then they will go, and if not, they won't. Plain and simple. I've dealt with bullying most of my life, and it never stopped me from continuing to go to school, and continuing to be a nerd who studied constantly. Because I valued it more than I disliked being bullied. Also, there a…
/r/MensRights04/02/17 02:04 PM
3

Yes, it's fine that you have to make that trade-off. You have to look at what you as an individual value, and choose the option that best matches these values. Those who value winning more will choose the winning team, those who value a good team environment will choose the other team. That's what freedom is all about, giving you the ability to choose. Or do you think it would be better if a culture was established in the league that didn't tolerated d-bags and bullies? Yes, and it would also be…
/r/MensRights03/02/17 05:27 PM
1

Being fair, that's usually two different people. Not saying it's not a problem, and I'm not saying they both don't identify as a feminist.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 10:08 AM
7

I thought Jew described both race and religion. I vaguely remember reading that converts to Judaism are treated kinda like second class citizens by some Jews because they aren't genetic Jews.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 07:35 PM
26

Naw man. Us Asian guys are quickly becoming one of you. If it wasn't for the lack of media representation and the dick jokes, we'd already be on the SJW white male train to hell.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 01:56 PM
5

Well... I certainly think it's a stupid thing to throw a marriage away for, but it's certainly in her rights to divorce him. Honestly, if I were him, I'd be grateful to have this level of pettiness revealed. It'd be way worse if he found out over, "No, I want our baby to be named..."
/r/MensRights13/08/16 10:08 PM
1

So this post has been up 2 hours so far and no one wants to listen to me. Listen to what though? You haven't provided anything for people to look at. You've given one link in the entirety of the comments here. People have jumped to the assumption that I'm a troll. You have a new account with no other history besides this post. You have provided nothing to support your claims of being an academic. You haven't provided any information you supposedly have that you believe could benefit the sub. Are…
/r/MensRights10/08/16 01:03 AM
21

I think it's our turn to say their stupid manta, "when you're accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression"
/r/MensRights01/08/16 07:34 PM
14

I lol'd at the comments section
/r/MensRights01/08/16 07:31 PM
6

This is one state Is it? Educate me if I'm wrong. Research and sources. I'm all ears if I'm wrong. All I care about is the truth. Though even if it is only one state, does that make it not a problem? If only one person was raped in the world, would it still be a problem? I would say yes. it's called an analogy moron I was going to point out that it's a bad analogy, but I didn't, and still don't, want to get into why. this is why everyone hates you guys, at least feminists stand up for intersecti…
/r/MensRights25/07/16 10:11 PM
7

I'm going to have to ask you to clarify your first paragraph. I can agree that men have some advantages, but I don't believe criminal justice is one of them. You can look all around from sexual assault definitions (The CDC doesn't count being made to penetrate as rape), to sentencing disparities, to the kind of help from the government men receive v.s. the help women receive. Source for the page that links to both of those In case you don't want to go to the links: Men The Men’s Domestic Violenc…
/r/MensRights25/07/16 05:55 PM
12

“ We need to be deliberate about understanding the different paths that can land women in prison, be more attentive to women's unique needs while they are incarcerated, and do more to support women and their families once they are released. I will institute gender-responsive policies in the federal prison system and encourage states to do the same ... ” Hillary, April 27, 2016 source I'm not really sure she's after equal rights either. Sounds more like she wants rights exclusively for women. If …
/r/MensRights25/07/16 05:26 PM
3

For now they do. But it's definitely in decline. When Donald Trump can pretend that he's religious and get the Christian right vote, it's clear they're after anyone who will at least pretend to hold their values.
/r/MensRights24/07/16 12:50 AM
2

I agree that intellectually both aren't prime sources of information, but each has their own kind of humor that may be worth time. As for Milo being harmful towards the gay community, I'm interested by what you mean by that.
/r/MensRights24/07/16 12:44 AM
6

But it's only this way because the people involved took all those other reasons, and blanketed them with "it's because they're women." If they took criticism as it was, instead of doing that, then it wouldn't have been a gender issue. It would have just been a movie being critiqued. As for the remarks about men's rights, the same could be said about Feminism.
/r/MensRights24/07/16 12:40 AM
1

Nothing at all. Its one of those things where its hugely controversial within the Trans community as well. Think about bisexuals in the LGBT community. They're constantly told that they're straight or gay and just looking to be special when its entirely possible that they could be bisexual. Sorry, just to clarify, this was in reference to whether or not there are more than two genders, right? I only ask because the analogy seems to fit the gender fluid point more, but you address that in the nex…
/r/MensRights18/07/16 07:03 PM
1

I apologize for the bigotry that you've faced. But, I would ask that you overlook these bigots, in the same way that you've asked reasonable people to overlook the subset of feminists that attack and hate men. I would also like to draw your attention to your original post, as it's been upvoted fairly high despite being against the original post, and hope that this indicates to you that there are rational people here. Reading through this specific comment thread and seeing it devolve from discuss…
/r/MensRights18/07/16 06:26 PM
1

Thank you for that correction. I hope I'm doing my math right this time around. It turns into a 27% if I'm doing this right. http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/nisvs_sofindings.pdf (770,000+4,478,000)/19,049,000
/r/MensRights18/07/16 03:35 AM
4

I agree that the graphic is pretty unrepresentative and cherry picks quite a bit. But your statistics about rape victims is actually a Men's rights issue. Rape typically doesn't include being made to penetrate (someone forcing someone else to insert their penis into someone or something) under the law (Assuming US or UK, don't know much about other places). With that included, the rape stat turns into a 60-40 split (women are the 60). The 1/6 women having been victims of rape doesn't tell us muc…
/r/MensRights18/07/16 01:23 AM
7

One group is overwhelmingly responsible for raising the men responsible for America's culture of violence, and it is... women.
/r/MensRights16/07/16 10:19 PM
1

Kill me now, I can't wait for natural causes. There's too much stupid in the world.
/r/MensRights15/07/16 09:38 PM
4

Well, slaves were 0/5 socially, they were 3/5 for population with regards to getting more state representatives. At least we count as 5/5 in that respect, so we have that going for us.
/r/MensRights13/07/16 11:07 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter