TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

xanderjanz Archive

View 2 posts and 57 comments by xanderjanz on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

9 months vs 18 years
/r/MensRights03/05/14 11:08 PM
2

Go read a poem. You can't just mad lib everything by the r/seduction book. You have to make mistakes and be convincingly human, or else she is fair to assume you are a robot. It's like the zen saying "If you prize a perfectly polished ball you should put a crack in it to show how perfectly the rest is polished"
/r/seduction25/02/14 05:47 PM
1

Then explain that. Talk about how you feel, and what is influencing your choices (such as /r/seduction research). If you feel like they are thinking you are dishonest, unpack that with them.
/r/seduction25/02/14 05:30 PM
14

If it's on school property, it has to be be school approved. The school administration is liable.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 09:21 AM
1

There's like 100 ways to do it painlessly. It's absolutely rediculous to imply that it should be done on babies so that they "forget". Nobody forgets.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 03:47 PM
23

Nobody is talking about banning circumcision. Just letting people choose.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 09:18 PM
1

Yea it is actively evolving. I'm talking about Judith Butler's queer theory, which has risen to acceptance over the past 10 years.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 10:29 PM
1

Yea but the key idea is that it's not only along two axis (feminine vs masculine) it's literally anything that you do. If you said your gender involved making trumpet noises each time you enter a new room, queer theorists would understand that.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 09:02 PM
0

Mmm, it's actually more like an arena for performance according to queer theory. The same way an actor could play thousands of different characters, people can play thousands of different genders.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 08:44 PM
6

Micheal Kimmel is always pushing for this group.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 11:05 PM
10

Don't feel bad. 'The wall' only punishes women who want a family but didn't plan for it. She is still free to live a successful life with her cats.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/13 07:04 PM
1

Clearly you gentlemen aren't thinking straight here. The real victim is the girl who was slut shamed for viewing pornography. You see the patriarchy wanted to punish her sexuality, so her only rational recourse was to deflect. Get some empathy you jerks. /s
/r/MensRights28/12/13 04:02 PM
9

Whats the causation between being paid more and workplace deaths? Surely the highest paying jobs have very low death and injury rates.
/r/MensRights27/12/13 08:54 AM
8

How do those complaints proceed. Do the send someone to do an audit? Do you have to testify in court or something?
/r/MensRights26/12/13 08:50 AM
6

Post-structuralism is a branch of modern philosophy. Like all academic labels, it's a bit ambiguous, but basically it means that social systems are far too fast changing, self-referential, and complex to be reliant on any fixed structure or framework. So post-structural feminists are academic feminists that use post-structural logic to argue for gender equality. This is where the modern idea that gender is individually performed, instead of socially constructed, comes from. Tldr: read the Wikipe…
/r/MensRights15/12/13 06:54 AM
10

This is why post-structural feminism is so important for MRAs! Feminists like Judith Butler are realizing that a black+white view of power structure is counter-productive. And they are evolving the theories. Though certainly not fast enough IMO.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 05:23 AM
0

Nope. You need to unpack what I mean by fear in this context. She made the judgment that bitcoins aren't "age-appropriate". That is inherently a fear-based judgment. Fearing some damage it will do to the kids. However, she never justified that fear. Thats why I labeled it irrational. Perhaps the generalization I made was conflating bitcoin into technology. But I still think that is fair because she made no distinction between the two, and her only provided counter-examples were of non-technologi…
/r/MensRights12/12/13 01:16 AM
-1

Thats not sexism? wat?
/r/MensRights11/12/13 10:43 PM
1

Maybe. He did post screencaps of the grading website though.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 10:42 PM
-1

I read her comments and didn't find any rationality. If you find her rationality, let me know. I made that judgment based only on her own words.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 10:42 PM
1

It would have been a little weird if I, out of nowhere, asked "what is hypergamy" in a thread about an example of it where the word hadn't been mentioned yet. It's like, What is argumentative discourse?
/r/MensRights11/12/13 01:10 AM
1

woosh
/r/MensRights11/12/13 01:04 AM
-1

I think she's just "gaslighting", trying to explain away her irrational fear of technology (which is very related to misandry). She made no good faith argument connecting any of those topics and bitcoins. She just listed a random set of offensive topics.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 01:00 AM
1

What is hypergamy?
/r/MensRights10/12/13 10:15 PM
10

He has called out other female politicians for this before. I think he is seriously tired of the "men are the problem" rhetoric.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 04:48 AM
7

I don't mind the satire, I'm mad about the hypocrisy. If Facebook wants to be a 'safe space' where violence isn't tolerated, that's their right. But only targeting men and conservatives is hypocritical.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 11:58 PM
10

It's a misdemeanor to be homeless?
/r/MensRights29/09/13 12:35 PM
2

The problem with civil suits is that it relys on family and friends of the deceased to peruse justice. Criminal charges are pursued by the state, and therefor offers more justice to men without sufficient support systems.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 07:43 AM
1

There's a huge difference between a stranger insulting your religion, and your life partner saying that you aren't good enough. I'm talking about theoretical situations (that do happen) where the suicide could have been prevented by mutual divorce, or relationship therapy. And was caused by an emotionally abusive partner. If we think marriage is so important that we protect it with alimony and divorce, why can't we say "You have a moral and legal responsibility for the well being of your partner…
/r/MensRights29/09/13 07:19 AM
1

I'm not talking about murder though. Murder is illegal is every state already. I'm talking about shaming someone into suicide. I agree the law makes sense. I'm saying we should bring a similar law to the US to curb male suicides. I think if people are legally responsible for the mental health of their partners, we would see less suicides.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 07:04 AM
1

I think there is also a personal element of shame these women feel, that they weren't 'attractive' enough or 'womanly' enough to convince their father to pay more. Not saying it's justified, but it's equivalent to the personal shame a man might feel for not being productive enough to keep his job.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 03:08 AM
2

This cliche is so insubstantial as to border on nonsense. Men are people. Women are people. People are imperfect, and it's not dehumanizing to have an opinion on women as a group. In fact forming an opinion is fundamental to being human. Refusing to form your own opinion turns YOU into a robot.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 05:46 PM
0

If you want to make a brand which refuses to take a stance, good luck. I think it's called nihilism.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 03:49 AM
1

Yea, I'm no digital artist. I'll improve it over time.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 03:47 AM
0

I was bored, and made this brand to try and unify our two causes. There is a lot of common ground, and we all think that gender is not a basis for judgment. Here is my brief on the design: The Choice Movement "Pro-Human" Members are called choosers, choosies, or choice activists The Choice Movement fights for anyone who was denied a fair choice. Choice fights for the self-determination rights of all humans. All humans are born to make choices, but society can squeeze us into labels for profit an…
/r/MensRights26/09/13 02:44 AM
1

rofl, ok gunna repost <3 EDIT: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1n5g2x/a_brand_for_feminists_and_mens_rights_activists/
/r/MensRights26/09/13 02:38 AM
1

I got bored and made this brand/logo to try and unify Feminists and MRA's. Because in the end we all want freedom and equality. Here is my brief on the design: The Choice Movement "Pro-Human" Members are called choosers, choosies, or choice activists The Choice Movement fights for anyone who was denied a fair choice. Choice. fights for the self-determination rights of all humans. All humans are born to make choices, but society can squeeze us into labels for profit and efficiency. Choice fights …
/r/MensRights26/09/13 02:29 AM
2

It's not like the kids are being killed, they are still well off after being taken away. A normal person's parental instincts should be satisfied with that. It's mostly selfishness that makes people demand ownership of their kids.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 12:36 AM
1

Hehe, I enjoyed it too, thanks. I recognize that MRA's have a rap of being unrelenting jerks. So I try to make a conscious effort to point out when I agree online. Like you said earlier, I think people are often much more reasonable than their comments would suggest.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 10:22 PM
1

agreed. edit: Except for the relevancy of women's agency. One injustice doesn't excuse another.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 09:57 PM
1

The injsutice I see here is on the part of the Al Jazeera editors. They put this documentary out that specifically shames Tajik men for having agency. The entire article is predicated on the idea that Tajik men aren't doing enough for the Tajik women. If you read the comments everyone is calling them cowards, and saying they aren't "man enough".
/r/MensRights03/08/13 08:19 PM
1

I'm not saying their life is great, of course it's worse than mine. I'm totally sympathetic to that. It doesn't mean that these married women don't have certain privileges over their male counter parts. I'm looking at this in the context of how incredibly complex it is. It's not as simple as one group being the "privileged" group. There are real grievances on both sides.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 07:39 PM
1

If I could choose between staying at home and shipping off to an unknown land. Seems pretty simple to me. Ask these women to go find work for the family and I think you will find how they are privileged.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 09:06 AM
0

Am I crazy, or is this article just so entitled it's crazy.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 05:38 AM
3

There's a science behind the text. But their judicial application is lacking. Psychological symptoms can look like anything.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 06:32 AM
5

lawyers.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 03:29 AM
4

Science says "Women want the D" source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penis_envy
/r/seduction28/05/13 06:44 PM
0

This is the username I use publicly. Why should I be afraid? I'm not saying anything hateful.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 11:08 PM
-8

She certainly wasn't responsible for the ENTIRE mess. She didn't fire that guy, and she didn't hack SendGrid's website. Those two events claimed to be in response to her, but it doesn't make her responsible.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 05:54 PM
-10

Her response marginalizes what are sometimes very real and serious sexism problems in the tech industry. This specific situation was of course stupid and irrelevant. But it makes the women who do actually deal with sexism look like childish complainers. I get that's not part of the whole /r/MR message, but I work with developers, and I can tell you real (non-joke) sexism does happen sometimes.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 04:35 PM
33

Coolest part was them updating the much cited Code of Conduct to discourage Internet Mob justice.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 04:21 PM
-30

What a terrible situation all around. Guy gets needlessly fired and slandered, women in tech get marginalized, SendGrid loses face, and this girl got fired for a personal blog post. Where's the Justice?
/r/MensRights21/03/13 04:13 PM
-1

I'd tap that resource.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 01:06 AM
2

I think its not about the direct suffering, but the sentiment which the practice institutionalizes. Male babies should "suck it up" and the less they feel or express pain the more of a man they are. No big deal, just some foreskin right?
/r/MensRights11/11/12 05:15 AM
-1

I believe he is commenting on the wil wheaten quote used on the rules page. "Don't be a dick". Its a disturbing case of hypocrisy that people would reference a rules page which uses a gendered insult to vilify a gendered insult. In a vacuum however, I do think both words are completely appropriate. I mean they're just words after all.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 02:21 PM
19

Whatever guys. The campaign's job is to help you memorize the bad fatty acid names (Saturated and Trans-fats). The best way to do that for a person, is with "human" names. I don't think everything needs to be perfectly PC. This is comparable to Feminism whining.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 05:42 PM
-1

I don't see much of an issue with asking for specific genders for jobs. Same way as I might look for a certain personality or someone with a certain look while hiring. Workplaces directly benefit from diversity, it cultivates innovation and inspires openness. You have to think about it as designing a tribe. I wouldn't succeed in the rainforest if everyone in my tribe solved problems the same way.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 01:09 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter