TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

xbyiu Archive

View 2 posts and 33 comments by xbyiu on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
27

xbyiu/r/MensRights09/06/11 09:53 PM
6

xbyiu/r/MensRights06/10/11 03:20 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

How is it not up to date? Today, in 2012, men are required to sign up for Selective Service while women are not. Seems up to date to me.
/r/MensRights28/05/12 11:28 PM
4

Men are required to sign up for Selective Service in the US, women are not. If there is a draft, it means men who do not want to fight will die while women who do not want to fight will live. In what way is that not female privilege? Women get to live, men get to die, just because of their sex.
/r/MensRights28/05/12 04:55 AM
13

Fuck you, get out of r/mensrights
/r/MensRights10/01/12 07:45 PM
4

What? No, of course not. What I'm saying is that Indian- and Arab-Americans faced a lot of discrimination after 9/11, and I don't think it's beyond belief that someone might've been "run out of town."
/r/MensRights15/12/11 05:41 AM
2

At least one, probably more. Which I think makes being "run out of town" seem a little bit plausible.
/r/MensRights15/12/11 05:23 AM
11

Dude...there were Indian people who got killed after 9/11. The gas station owner? Remember him? I dislike SRS too, but I think you need to cool it.
/r/MensRights15/12/11 05:07 AM
27

I particularly enjoyed this comment by Phifty: My wife is a martial arts instructor. I am a software engineer. Imagine LaFaunda and Kip from Napoleon Dynamite. Got that picture in your head? Good. Now imagine my wife takes a shiner from one of her students. This happens once or twice a year. In her line of work, it's normal. Regardless that my wife is an Amazonian warrior that could pop me like a pimple if she wanted, who do you think gets the stinkeye when we go anywhere when she's wearing the …
/r/MensRights11/11/11 07:30 PM
2

Of course the problem won't be solved until they knock it off, but here's the dirty little secret: rapists aren't going anywhere. There will always be bad people in the world. There will always be thieves and murderers. But you do what you can to protect yourself. A national "don't rape anyone" movement won't stop rape, the same way outlawing slavery didn't stop it and still doesn't stop it to this day. Sometimes you have to accept that the world we live in is terrible and filled with terrible p…
/r/MensRights07/10/11 02:57 AM
2

And neither will telling the water-damaged carpet that "only the crack in the roof can fix itself." You have two choices. Putting the bucket down or marching around talking about the crack in the roof. Only one of these actually prevents any real damage from occurring.
/r/MensRights07/10/11 02:25 AM
2

It pretty much is. Edit: If you say "rape can not be stopped by remaining vigilant" and I stop a rape by remaining vigilant, then that means remaining vigilant stopped a rape. So rape can be stopped by remaining vigilant. It's an insane, flawed argument.
/r/MensRights07/10/11 02:04 AM
2

Rape can not be stopped by remaining vigilant. Rape can only be stopped if rapists stop raping. Well there you go
/r/MensRights07/10/11 12:41 AM
2

I'm aware of what provoked the original slutwalk. I brought up fighting back because it's an effective measure against rape. I made this point in the DepthHub thread: the cop was advising women to be cautious. Maybe he went about it in a dumb way with antiquated advice, but advising women to dress more conservatively is in no way "victim blaming." It's just advice. Maybe it's bad advice, but it's certainly not malevolent. Whether it's an effective measure against rape is up for debate, but the f…
/r/MensRights06/10/11 09:52 PM
0

Of course http://www.trccmwar.ca/drupal/articles/fighting_back
/r/MensRights06/10/11 08:41 PM
5

Ah, my mistake. I misinterpreted. And those are some very interesting points.
/r/MensRights06/10/11 03:59 AM
2

I tried to be as gender neutral as possible throughout the post.
/r/MensRights06/10/11 03:37 AM
11

They seem to be a frequenter of r/beatingwomen. Best to put them on the ignore list.
/r/MensRights27/09/11 11:37 PM
4

The option to implement the rules is underpinned by a theory that society gives boys an unfair edge. See, this is the problem. It's a great idea in theory, but when this is your premise the natural result will be anti-male sexism.
/r/MensRights13/09/11 07:08 PM
7

Possibly allegedly thanks for this. I'm skeptical of course, given the evidence, but it's good that we're not jumping to conclusions. There is still the very real possibility that she was assaulted, although judging by the evidence it seems unlikely.
/r/MensRights11/09/11 04:37 AM
21

I wonder what his reddit username is
/r/MensRights22/07/11 10:20 PM
2

Oh, I don't think there's anything wrong with pointing out that a joke is tasteless and why. It was the ensuing lecture, arguing and petty re-posting that showed OP was escalating things beyond reason. That's a valid point, and I think you helped me see the issue a little bit more clearly. And overall I agree with you. I think you're right that the humor comes from seeing a typically strong man in weakened state. What I meant about not seeing the results portrayed is the whole fertility/hernia i…
/r/MensRights07/07/11 10:14 PM
1

I see what you're saying, and I have some level of agreement and some level of disagreement. The conflict here seems like an issue of social graces. Perhaps, in your opinion, it was inappropriate of OP to respond to a non-serious post with a serious one. If you think that people make unfunny/racist/sexist/violent jokes on the internet. It happens. And calling them out on it via serious discourse/petty re-posting usually doesn't lead anywhere useful. then I would hope that you would be internally…
/r/MensRights07/07/11 04:56 AM
6

Did he blur out the names so no one could find me and downvote me to oblivion? Did he post the original thread that said the woman was spat on multiple times every time their paths cross? Even if he did, people would still be able to find the thread by looking at his comment history. 2. He did post a description of the original thread in the comments. You can see from the cap he took that spitting was involved, and I think that's enough. Edit: if he tried to include the entire exchange it's poss…
/r/MensRights06/07/11 03:36 AM
3

I think there's enough context there to judge the situation. Someone spit in a woman's face, she said that was justification for kicking someone in the testicles, OP disagreed, then you and OP had your exchange. Sorry if I missed anything, but that appears to be the situation. What I do not see is OP calling the hate brigade. I think he was genuinely dissatisfied about having his opinion dismissed as trolling. I think he was trying to add to the discussion by pointing out that a kick to the test…
/r/MensRights06/07/11 03:08 AM
6

monstermash-up was. Whether intentional or unintentional, the comment you made appeared to be defending a very extreme form of violence against men. Obviously his remarks were inappropriate and the spitting is intolerable, but rendering him infertile with a severe form of aggression is entirely indefensible. Maybe you didn't mean to defend it, but that's what most of the people here saw in your comment.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 02:45 AM
11

You're probably a pretty cool person, with some pretty reasonable opinions. But a nutshot can render a man infertile, and we as a culture shouldn't be encouraging violence against men.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 01:30 AM
1

I'm not saying that it isn't sexist, what I'm saying is perhaps we should stick to news and articles, and keep away from facebook and tumblr posts if we want to be taken seriously as a movement.
/r/MensRights01/07/11 06:09 PM
1

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/icxgu/stuff_like_this_women_dont_belong_here_may_i/
/r/MensRights01/07/11 08:32 AM
2

It would be great if NJ followed in NYs footsteps
/r/MensRights30/06/11 01:57 AM
1

The "feminism" that was co-opted by capitalist interests is what you describe, not actual feminism that socialist and communist activists struggled for. Don't dismiss the entire movement. Oh man I agree with this and I am so going to upvote you! It makes you look like an idiot. Nevermind.
/r/MensRights28/06/11 05:49 AM
-2

Ugh this is exactly the type of subreddit I would love to frontpage because I think race is a huge issue and it would be great to see some nice articles seriously exploring racism, but with that kind of attitude it doesn't seem worth it.
/r/MensRights19/06/11 07:17 PM
1

you disagree with...reality?
/r/MensRights31/05/11 08:51 PM
2

My name is NiceIce and I didn't read the link Hey there NiceIce! You should probably read the link before commenting :)
/r/MensRights31/05/11 03:34 AM
10

she is soooo mad right now
/r/MensRights25/05/11 09:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter