TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

xiiteelee Archive

View 0 posts and 110 comments by xiiteelee on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

No, I said you argument is oversimplifying reality, because it is. And because it's based on non real assumptions it does not apply to the real world, which in my view makes it not an argument, in the sense that it holds any value. If what you were saying were true, then the politics in every country were the same, but they are not.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/18 06:37 AM
4

So, you agree then, just because people are becoming more conservative in terms of what sex means in relation to relationships and a persons worth in the dating market, that doesn't mean that whatever associations you make with conservative politics will come to be reimplemented. Also, by saying your argument oversimplifies reality I am fairly explicitly pointing out that your argument isn't an argument, thereby refuting it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/18 06:23 AM
4

Me: Your argument doesn't work in the real world. You: Yet, you have not refuted it! ??? make an argument that makes sense and we can talk about refuting it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/18 04:45 AM
6

Hint: if your argument only works when you oversimplify reality it's not a good argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/18 04:25 AM
5

Oh, yeah, well you can have conservative views on things like relationships but not on abortion. You're thinking too much in left-right dualism. Real life, and opinions are multi dimensional.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/18 04:06 AM
4

No they aren't. Don't know what the second sentence is supposed to mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/18 04:03 AM
7

You're thinking of conservative policies, not conservative views in terms of relationships and sex. You can have sex ed and conservative views on relationships at the same time.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/18 03:52 AM
4

This comment his hilariously nonsensical in the context of his comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/18 03:49 AM
1

She would absolutely not be.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/18 04:41 PM
3

Better position than 2 million cash?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/18 10:44 AM
4

Except it plays exactly into what they are saying. For the to percentage sex is abound, and hookup culture is part of that. The bottom get less. The study doesn't contradict that at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/18 12:12 AM
0

Sorry, I had real life happening in between. Darwinism refers to evolutionary forces, that act without intent by any of natures subject. ie. it doesn't matter what the intent of natures rapists is, if the effect is procreation. If Joe the Rapist had 50 kids in his life, then he was far more successful (as measured by evolutionary dominance) than Bill the Cuck, who thinks he fathered 2, but actually its maybe 1.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/18 01:55 PM
0

Literally 0 reading comprehension, good job.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/18 11:16 AM
1

no
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/18 05:26 PM
1

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hypergamy You even link the definition and then say something that does not accord to it at all. Caste and social class do not change in the slightest bit by aging. In fact, if anything, older people are more likely to be wealthy than younger people, so if anything the old man has a higher class than before, but, this is due to his financial status, not due to his age.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/18 04:44 PM
2

Saying no to a sloppy kiss got me a slap the other day. Captain anecdote strikes again.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/18 09:32 AM
2

But if you want to marry and have children (your real preference doesn't matter here, because it's a market force) then the 40 year old might not be your first choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/18 09:30 AM
7

no he clubbed her over the head and she saw stars.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/18 02:38 AM
3

Guy posts list. Guy replies only [thing from list]?!?!?!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/18 01:41 AM
1

Well, you certainly gave a definition. Not the correct one, mind you, but you gave one.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/18 01:29 AM
0

What has that to do with what the other guy said?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/18 01:29 AM
1

I think it's pretty clear you don't know what you are talking about and didn't provide an accurate representation of his preferences in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/18 08:52 AM
1

You are upset I pointed out what you did was useless. Okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/18 03:08 AM
0

And it's a meaningless thing to calculate as it does not imply anything about his preferences.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/18 01:41 PM
0

I understand what you are saying, but your claim is untrue. The ranges he gave can be accurate in that they represent his true preferential ranges, that does not make the ranges factored with each other equating his real preferences a stringently logical conclusion. To rephrase: Just because he gave two preferred ranges, that does not mean every combination of those ranges is a preferred combination. it's just not a logical conclusion. What do you not understand?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/18 01:39 PM
1

There are certain factors in the looks department that are also part of her character. How much she takes care of her body is definitely a character trait that affects other aspects of life, so I have a hard time splitting the two as you do in your post.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/18 06:06 AM
2

Matching two extreme ends is an argument ad absurdum. He is not saying that the lightest weight in the range and the highest height is the matchup he is desiring, or even one he would like at all. It is reasonable to assume that the shortest weight and height and the highest height and weight are the matchups hes thinking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/18 05:41 AM
0

Except that is not a logical conclusion at all. He gave two ranges, he did not say that the extreme opposite ends of this matchup is what he is looking for.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/18 05:36 AM
2

yes and no. The amount of asian woman that have not a muscle on their body is frightening. Muscles are heavier than fat, so in fact, I think most girls here could easily put on 8 kilos and still be super slim, except with an actually healthy body.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/18 01:49 AM
0

Imagine being this dishonest lmao. Given a height and age range, surely the reasonable approach would be to match the lower ends and the higher ends respectively? I doubt he thought: Either medium height and super thin, or a shorter and plumper! laughable how dishonest your post is.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/18 01:35 AM
-1

even in Asian countries I think that weight range is too low and restrictive. 50-60 and nearly every woman in China falls into this.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/18 01:26 AM
1

The whole point is to see your face. If you can't endure that, then meh.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/18 01:22 AM
1

It is still in the normal range though.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/18 01:20 AM
3

It's the norm where I am at.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/18 01:19 AM
3

I double checked the OP, and I can't find anything that your sarcastic TIL logically follows from.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/18 12:07 PM
1

not it does, and because of it median average and mean average are very similar. There are very few extreme values that pull these values apart.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/18 04:05 AM
1

The median is the middle data point of a given set. It's not the middle value.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/18 03:47 AM
1

it was created as a hookup app, but yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/18 04:12 PM
2

Being good has little to do with being desirable.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/18 04:08 PM
1

There is no reason to believe there are morals that do not come from man. Your pseudo babble does not change that.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/18 04:43 AM
1

good for you I can only repeat myself, all morals or other people's morals.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/18 04:10 AM
1

in the world or the Us
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/18 04:09 AM
2

Dude that was so poorly worded that it was really not clear what you were even talking about. Putting the definition of variable at the end for example.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/18 04:03 AM
1

Except many people claim to be in the same room while actually being in another. As to say, by arguing in bad faith you are actually not part of the real conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/18 03:42 AM
4

It is both parties' responsibility to discuss consequences before actually engaging in sex (I know that's not sexy but that's how I view personal responsibility). So if the man makes it clear before sex that he doesn't want children and wants an abortion and the woman goes ahead with having sex anyway, in that case I believe he would be justified in not having responsibility. He made his stance clear ahead of time and she went ahead anyway. Step 1: Pretend to be reasonable by placing an unrealis…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/18 03:35 AM
1

Yes, but now you are beyond just claiming he doesn't criticise the right, and into the field of you just disagreeing with him.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/18 03:26 AM
1

that capitalism actually allow whole generations of people to live in luxury while never working a day in their life, which totally flies into the face of their otherwise claimed values of work ethic. you neglected to mention that capitalism also believes you have right to property and as such have a right to use at as you see fit. by giving it to your children for example. That there is value in in work ethic does not change this and is not a direct contradiction.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/18 03:22 AM
2

I think you asked me exactly this question before. it's an irrelevant question.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/18 03:16 AM
2

Why do you not feel menwomen should not have personal responsibility here?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/18 03:14 AM
2

What a weak character you are revealing there. "I support your choice no matter what as long as I like the choice you are making."
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/18 03:12 AM
2

Pointing out that there are women in some shithole getting their genitals mutilated has literally nothing to do with western society other than implications for immigration, so by the way you worded that you already made any conversation useless.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/18 02:51 AM
1

Why would I tell them about something some redditor made up about me?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 06:09 PM
1

REALITY makes it possible to not have a baby despite conception. No amount of denying this makes it not so. You trying to say men that get girls pregnant have NO responsibility to raising the kid is an insane justification for trying to evade all repurcussions of your actions. You want to act selfish and do whatever you want without any responsibility for your actions. Quote me bitch.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 05:56 PM
1

No reality disagrees with you, the law is the law, unless you're telling me that biology changes as fast as the law does, or that law does change as fast as tech does (it very much does not), then that is a non argument. You are deriving things from what I said that do not follow, and are attacking those things instead of the statement I did make, wich is, that women have the last call.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 05:46 PM
1

Red Pill is orthogonal to the main stream. So, what is the usual?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 05:16 PM
1

Your point would be clearer if you used punctuation. Atheists only have other people's morals? Here's a clue, every moral is people's morals.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 05:15 PM
0

What is blue pill actually? In my mind it's just a contrarian position, so obviously you can't actually nail anything down.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 08:28 AM
2

Honestly, I have friends and I have 'friends'. The guys I really consider my real friends, are guys I really care about.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 08:16 AM
1

Never heard this said in this context.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 08:11 AM
1

There are also unhygienic women, believe me.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 08:07 AM
1

Reality shits on single mothers.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 07:40 AM
1

I know you really want man and woman to bear the same responsibility, but reality disagrees. It takes two to make a child, but only the woman can make the decision to abort. There is no equality in inherently unequal circumstances. In fact, women can got to sperm banks and become single parents without a guy being actively involved at all. Technology makes your argument obsolete.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 07:40 AM
1

This is demonstrably true regardless of being TRP or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 07:38 AM
2

Leave it to a theist needing outside intervention as their moral guidance to tell the world why atheists cannot have morals.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 07:34 AM
2

He didn't mention anything of the sort that could be called altruism. Also the alternative model when considering hypergamy is men having multiple women, so there is no question of paternity.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 07:29 AM
1

Except studies show that this is not the case?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 07:26 AM
1

not really though
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 02:16 AM
1

Do you know what the purpose of an insult is?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/18 03:08 PM
1

You're comparing a theoretical ideal with an negative example. do you really think everyone in Chinese society has a successful future ahead of them?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/18 03:06 PM
1

Can you see any landmarks from where you at?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/18 06:52 PM
1

You know
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/18 06:44 PM
1

Because two can play the game.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/18 06:39 PM
1

thats ok by me
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/18 06:33 PM
1

Well, if you look at a message it has multiple components: Who says it. How they say it. What they say. How it is perceived. By whom is it received. Again, the base assumption of communication is the will to actually transmit information, in this case the information is your opinion. Now, your message did not manage to achieve the goal of transmitting the information you just claimed you wanted to. I believe this is mainly due to the fact, that you failed to consider that the recipients of the m…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/18 06:25 PM
1

Well, funnily enough, if you google 'man up', then the very first result is an example of a movie named that, which does exactly what you seem to be unable to conceive of. Other than that, it's not like there will be scientific literature on this, and other than saying that I have myself said and thought this on multiple occasions about women, which will not convince you, I can only again point at your (lack of) imagination.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/18 06:17 PM
1

Ok, if that was what you were trying to message, then I have to say you failed. Because that can't possibly be interpreted from lol@x
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/18 06:16 PM
2

You think you're being quirky and witty, but really you're just being petulant.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/18 06:08 PM
3

The fact that you made a comment leads me to believe you want to share your views. Maybe I was mistaken and you are writing out of pure catharsis and you don't care if anybody so much as reads your comments though.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/18 04:51 PM
2

Your lack of imagination has no bearing on reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/18 04:50 PM
2

You could have said: There are valid reasons to not move out as soon as possible, and just doing it because everyone seems to is not a valid reason in itself. Instead you worded it in an alienating way that guarantees that most people will just ignore your point.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/18 02:48 PM
3

I mean with gender equality and all that is a reasonable thing to say in the proper context.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/18 02:47 PM
3

reddit is full of repellent foreign and autistic losers not normal ESTJ and ISTJ AFCs who just need a little help with dating to turn the corner. What is this? edit: holy shit, that is actually spelled that way in US english.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/18 02:32 PM
2

No, I think you should just accept that terms such as those exist, and if they get made taboo by people like you ("that's offensive!1eleven!") then new ones will pop up that serve the exact same function. Also I don't believe you when you say you don't use those terms. habitually?, sure, I buy that, but never? Go fuck yourself. Also to jump start your comprehension of what I wrote: Fact refers what I actually said vs. what you claimed I had said, not necessarily to the claim of what I had origin…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/18 02:28 PM
1

The way idiot is used today originates with a 19th century medical usage. Fact. I didn't say you were fine with their usage, I was saying you somehow didn't choose to fight over those terms in the same way you seem to care about the others. Fact. And here is this term that made you a stumble earlier again: Either way, "correcting" me on the words origin has no implication on my argument, that trying to stave off the usage of "offensive" terms is a Sisyphus task that misses the nature of how such…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/18 02:22 PM
1

People sometimes fuck themselves over while thinking they are getting one up on society/a person/their parents etc. The opportunity cost of his behaviour far outweighs his gain.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/18 02:15 PM
2

I'm ignoring the conditional in your question, because it's not what I claimed and it's just a cheap attempt at goal posting, but, for example, in Italy very commonly live with their parents until marriage. In China, the parent child relationship often includes children living with their parents until marriage as well. In fact, this means that to be attractive for marriage a guy must be able to buy a flat or house for his wife, and if he can't it's often the parents who then chip in if they can,…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/18 02:13 PM
2

Just like poor people remaining poor because they don't have the mental toolset to free themselves, so does this guy think he is being smart while he's actually just lacking the skills to become an accomplished and self fulfilled real human being.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/18 02:07 PM
2

Ah, yes, the sophisticated intellectual lives at his parents house, you should know! You realize there is a way of stating what you are getting out without coming of like a total neckbeard right?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/18 02:04 PM
1

Why? Just because he referred to the specific gender does not mean it's not also broadly applicable.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/18 02:03 PM
1

In the CNN interview you could see him stumble over his own words in a way that people always do when they are suddenly put on the spot and forced to verbally argue their beliefs to people that know nothing about the topic. ie. people who you need to actually spell out your logic for, instead of preaching to the choir or a shouting match of equally little depth.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/18 02:02 PM
1

If I were the guy I'd be fundamentally ashamed, no argument there. that said, it's completely and entirely cultural, and not at all a natural given. There are plenty of societies, today, that have children living with their parents till their mid thirties, or even forever live in a multi generational environment. My only point is that when you use the word 'should' then that is only true in this cultural context. In other countries, or even other communities in the US, parents would probably sha…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/18 01:59 PM
2

"see, i totally already claimed you were wrong, without making a case for it, so if you don't admit to it, then that just proves it true" you, probably let me spell it out, the greek roots of idiot does not change that it was a medical term, and that is how it found itself into modern colloquial roots. By pretending that the greek roots are all that matter you are not actually addressing what my point was (and is, correctly so) that these terms all originated as medical terms which is exactly wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/18 01:42 PM
2

No I said either way, which means, regardlessly of whether or not I was right, which I was. But it's ok, I already knew you were a little slow on the pickup. Like a retard so to speak.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/18 12:11 PM
3

Ok what about moron? Either way, you obviously are selectively blind about what terms are bad. I wouldn't use it because it isn't polite. Only a grade A fucking retard would think that these terms are meant to be polite by the person using them.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/18 11:52 AM
3

Idiot A simple google search would have sufficed to show you that you are wrong on that assumption. Talk about being ignorant.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/18 11:39 AM
1

Why am I not seeing you up in arms about terms such as dumb and idiot? Both are terms for what we now know are medical conditions. Oh I know, because your arguments aren't internally consistent.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/18 11:24 AM
1

What are you basing this on?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/18 02:24 AM
1

If we are talking a sufficiently advanced social structure, then violent rape is not necessary to get sexual favours from less than willing tribe members. Sure you can't over do it in that scenario, but what is your point? This does relate in anyway to evolution as this kind of social structure is like in the recent 1% of human development.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/18 02:10 AM
1

CMVCMV: You can't have Yes you can.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/18 01:54 AM
1

Sure. Chimpanzees play out this scenario all the time. Doesn't mean that there is always a strongest chimp who calls the shots. Until he get's ripped apart by two younger guys if he is too overbearing. But he still had his way with the females up to that point, meaning he got to procreate.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/18 01:53 AM
-1

And anyways, I answered your question, your reply does not concern your question in the OP at all. You're not arguing about your question at all, you're just throwing out random counters that have nothing to do with the CMV topic at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/18 05:45 PM
-1

Because I got what I wanted. Also you are wildly exaggerating how steep that curve is.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/18 05:42 PM
0

Let me repeat myself, I've done this. People never do things for the first time? Stop pretending.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/18 05:28 PM
2

yes and? I've done this.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/18 05:04 PM
1

What kind of fucked up belief is this?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/18 04:35 PM
1

Or not, if you're the strongest, and or the one's stronger than you have their fill.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/18 01:42 PM
3

Marriage has always been a business transaction.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/18 06:18 AM
4

It didn't even out, you're just the other side of the statistic up there.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/18 03:46 AM
7

It is a real concept but it also figures as a straw man, in a sense, because it basically resembles a dumbed down version of what stoicism means, and it also serves as a way to attack people who act stoic (consciously or not) by ascribing a simpler dumber motivation.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/18 03:40 AM
17

The colloquial definition is just a straw man.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/18 02:27 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter