TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

xn28the-pos Archive

View 0 posts and 52 comments by xn28the-pos on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

"I'm going to continue being obtuse because there are other shitty people in the world."
/r/MensRights20/06/18 05:35 PM
3

A judge found that shithead college student guilty of rape and didn't send him to jail because it would hurt his future. That's pretty fucked up, no? A very low percentage of rape kits ever get processed due to the financial burden of getting a conviction. That's pretty fucked up, no? Comparing the West to other countries is absurd. Like, racism manifests itself in other countries in much more violent ways than in the US, so the us must not have a racism problem, right?
/r/TheRedPill06/04/18 01:21 AM
1

I didn't realize you were a mentally ill woman. Apologies.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/18 02:07 AM
-1

Literally everything you just wrote was either a regurgitated nonsense, false, or intentionally misleading. It's laughable. Maybe we can pick this up when you graduate high school.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/18 01:50 AM
0

“Virtue signalling feminist Me arguing that cat-calling is detrimental to society given the feedback of women around me and in the public eye is virtue signalling? Or is it that I simply stated that I practice what I preach? I fail to see how this is a bad thing. tries to argue that cat-calling is a crime, but fails spectacularly Your ad infinitum opinion that I have failed to demonstrate how verbal sexual harassment is illegal is hilarious at this point. and inadvertently exposes own sexist inf…
/r/PussyPassDenied19/02/18 06:56 PM
-1

Who the fuck do you think is going to read this? Stating psychological issues is not an insult to the character of a human. One individual with her past should not be the poster child for explaining why harassment is A-okay. Her being desperate for attention is not based on the fact that she likes catcalling. Or the fact that she calls herself a slut. Nor did I claim she's craving attention because she's an ex-prostitute! She's desperate for attention because she put it out there in a public opi…
/r/PussyPassDenied19/02/18 01:38 PM
-1

That's great, an article written by someone desperate for attention with an obvious set of psychological issues is a great defense for why catcalling is good for women. "I actually really like heroin, does that make me a bad doctor?" You use trigger and sjw like they are insults. Disagreeing with willfully ignorant people for their intentionally hurtful behavior is a good thing to most people. But it's a threat to your way of life, so you must trivialize it. You still argue catcalling stops at "…
/r/PussyPassDenied19/02/18 03:50 AM
0

Look at how far we've come. I've shown that catcalling can absolutely be considered a criminal threat. I've shown that obscenity in public is illegal. But that's not enough for you to admit that catcalling it wrong. You haven't even admitted that its a bad thing to do! Now, you want me to become a private detective AND an attorney? Talk about moving the goal post. It's not enough that I call sexist assholes out (in person, not just behind a computer). It's not enough that I engage people who are…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/02/18 11:59 PM
-1

Why would I delete an argument that makes you look like a terrible human? The cool thing about law is that you don't have to have identical cases for certain things to hold true. Catcalling isn't a work of art, but one could easily argue that it is a work. A creation. While you think I'm wasting my time, I'm actually observing the arguments of misogynist in the wild. You have none beyond "reading comprehension" which is clearly incorrect. Logical reasoning is a pretty simple concept if you've st…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/02/18 08:52 PM
-1

I've not contradicted myself a single time. I've clearly stated that changing the behavior is the most important part of this whole topic. Criminality is one method of doing so. You focused on this because you don't want to get in trouble for being a pig and treating women like objects. Social humiliation and ridicule is another method for deterring behavior. The bosses in the original post stopped mentoring women because they didn't want to be publicly outed for sexual harassment.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/02/18 08:20 PM
-1

Why is it so hard for you to grasp that not only does the Miller test ruling get to apply to other public acts, but I also did not say catcalling must be charged as a crime. We've focused on that because it's the only side of the argument you think you can win. I've also called for public humiliation and ticketing, which accidently, doesn't require it to be a crime. To reiterate, due to your incredibly disingenuous method of discussion, obscenity in public is illegal. Catcalling can and often do…
/r/PussyPassDenied17/02/18 09:31 PM
1

I was actually on the fence with this social movement. Then I started listening to those actually affected by it.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/02/18 07:20 PM
0

The Miller test refers to determining whether a creative work is considered to be "obscene" and therefore has nothing to do with cat-calling (which is not a creative work), and does not support your argument vis a vis criminalizing cat callers in any way. It defines what is obscene and defines public obscenity to be illegal. Again, you're incorrect. You failed again. Failed in what, exactly? I've provided sources for why obscenity is illegal and that horn honking is also illegal. There is a very…
/r/PussyPassDenied17/02/18 01:28 PM
1

I've gotten my badge of honor. I took that childish notion from you, douche. You need me to provide proof that sexual harassment is against the law when it comes to free speech. From Wikipedia (go ahead, call it a bad source): Under the Miller test (which takes its name from Miller v. California), speech is unprotected if (1) "the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find that the [subject or work in question], taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest" and (…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/02/18 10:13 PM
0

Straw man's gonna strawman. A woman going on a show with the intention of being scared by her phobia is not comparable to a woman walking home from work and being harassed. You don't have a justification for continuing to allow catcalling. You think you have a justification for belittling women who are afraid. You're a douche.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/02/18 09:33 PM
1

I've also used the word demonize. Do you think I want to turn offenders into demons? I've also suggested a social push for discouraging the behavior. I want SOME kind of change. It's as if you've failed to come up with a single justification for why I'm wrong, but you continue to focus on trivial semantics. If your next reply doesn't include some justification for why we should continue to encourage catcalling by not making it a legal offense, then I'm done here and I'm satisfied to know that yo…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/02/18 07:37 PM
0

Were the people who honked horns and received tickets given a traffic/regulatory offence ticket, or where they criminalized (i.e., subject to a criminal record, fine and or imprisonment)? Please provide a link to your example to verify because that's a very important distinction. I'm not sure why the distinction is important. A ticket is a ticket, meaning it is against the law. Regardless, this article describes the move to remove "no honking" signs. The fine is $350 dollars. It is still illegal…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/02/18 07:01 PM
1

The etc implies there are other things said in a cat-calling situation. It means etcetera. Now that you've epically failed to defend your arguments The fact that you made this an argument about reading comprehension and ignored the points I've made regarding other instances of criminalizing public displays of illegal speech (the New York horns) shows that you have no justification for the act of cat-calling. You haven't addressed my question about how one can find it defensible, you just claimed…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/02/18 05:26 PM
1

We are both dumbfounded by each other. I'm dumbfounded that you don't even know what you're writing. You're dumbfounded that I don't understand the bullshit you're throwing. The sentence begins with "A person is NOT guilty..." So yes, if ANY of those conditions apply, then they are free to go. I understand what "or" means. Right here, you are saying that if any of the conditions apply, they are free to go, so if ALL of the opposite of the conditions apply, they are not free to go. Here are the c…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/02/18 05:16 PM
0

It's not irrelevant or moving the goal post. Cat-calling us not usually just a whistle and it doesn't stop with "hey baby." You not knowing this is hilarious.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/02/18 04:58 PM
1

Literally everything you've said implies that you think all parts are required or else they're free to go. If that's not what you're implying, then you agree that being made afraid is a criminal offense and must be defended.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/02/18 04:44 PM
1

I'll reiterate because I didn't make myself clear. You are, in fact, the party guilty of misreading. You're saying that A, B, C, and D can ask be true, but if E isn't true, the person is not guilty. But, in reality, it states that if none of A, B, C, D, OR E are true, the person is not guilty. So, if a person feels afraid, the defendant would have to have a reasonable defense for making the statement. Tell me now, what is a reasonable defense for, "hey baby, let me see what you pee with." Hint: …
/r/PussyPassDenied16/02/18 04:30 PM
0

You would need an "and" for them all to be required. The facts that I have presented were relevant to the argument and you chose to ignore them because they challenged your previously held beliefs. Me insulting your character, in addition to presenting legitimate reasons cat-calling should be criminalized, does not take away from the fact that you are indeed a complicit misogynist. If you'd like to use that as a badge of honor, then it makes sense in a sub called pussypassdenied.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/02/18 04:17 PM
0

Okay, you're either being a troll, you're dense, or you can't read. Either way, this and your other reply to me indicates that you are indeed a misogynist and not interested in curbing dangerous behavior. Enjoy your Cheetos and self-pleasure.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/02/18 03:46 PM
0

That's not what "or" means. If ANY of those conditions apply, it looks like the defendant is not free and clear.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/02/18 03:11 PM
0

non-criminal speech So, you're arguing that cat-calling is a first amendment right? Because free speech is limited in that it cannot infringe on others rights. A person has the right to not feel harassed, and if they do, the person speaking to them is in the wrong. People here (not you) are asking if I think people should go to jail for it. No, of course not. But let's look at New York as an example. Horns were being used to much for purposes that were wrong. The unnecessary use of them was crea…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/02/18 02:51 PM
1

Panhandling is illegal in most areas. They stop it for a reason. Cops don't always do a good job, but it's illegal, unlike verbal harassment.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/02/18 02:23 PM
0

You conveniently glossed over the "does not feel afraid" part. Thanks for making my point for me!
/r/PussyPassDenied16/02/18 02:08 PM
0

I'm getting downvoted because I'm not bashing women. What people are arguing is the equivalent of a sibling waving their hand in front of the others have and saying, "not touching you, can't get mad. Not touching you, can't get mad." Except in this situation, the second person fears the consequences of just ignoring it.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/02/18 01:56 PM
-1

No, but if lightning strikes your house, I bet you tense up a bit. Are you equating the randomness of the lottery to violent crime?
/r/PussyPassDenied16/02/18 02:54 AM
-5

So, it's relevant that men are usually the victim, but not relevant that men are the aggressor? Sounds about on par for this sub.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/02/18 02:43 AM
-5

I'm an asshole because I don't agree with your viewpoint. Got it. No, you're an asshole because you support the scumhole ideologies of this sub. Does a group of men have the right to make someone feel in danger for their life? No one claimed they did. You do by saying its the woman's fault for using logic to assess a situation. Them feeling scared is due to a system that doesn't attempt to correct problematic behavior. Do women have the right to assume that everything is sexual assault simply be…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/02/18 02:04 AM
-10

Men also commit the vast majority of crime. Fear of men is not irrational.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/02/18 01:41 AM
-5

I'm a guy. And it does happen.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/02/18 01:12 AM
-49

They feel that way for a reason. That reason is statistics. Does a group of men have the right to make someone feel in danger for their life? I already know you're an asshole by your first comment. I'm just wondering how deep it goes. <you're making up terms. Google it. Verbal sexual assault and verbal sexual harassment are very real.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/02/18 10:51 PM
-48

Okay, now imagine that every time it happens, the person on the receiving end fears that their reaction to it (ignoring, smiling, yelling, whatever) could determine whether or not they get followed, robbed, raped, or murdered. Does forcing someone to make that decision change it to verbal assault? A textual comment, while also obnoxious, isn't in person. Sure, it could lead to a stalker, but that's far less likely.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/02/18 10:34 PM
-26

Do you consider cat-calling (whistling, "hey baby's", etc) verbal sexual assault?
/r/PussyPassDenied15/02/18 09:55 PM
-3

I'm not advocating for men to be able to use women for sex and bail to leave them with the difficult parts of THEIR consequences.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 08:28 PM
-3

Men should not be able to wipe their hands of any responsibility and leave the woman to fend for herself. You are a garbage person if you think he should.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 06:20 PM
0

It does though. When child care is directly connected to having an abortion, or not, it is a case of bodily autonomy. She must choose between being a single mother, having an abortion, or carrying to term and adoption. She can't just opt out like people are arguing the man should be able to. That's pretty pathetic.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 05:31 PM
-3

It's not hypocrisy. A woman would have to choose to be a single mother or have an abortion. Neither of those are easy decisions. The man has much easier choice in this situation and suddenly gets off with no hardship? That's fucking terrible.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 05:09 PM
0

Can she be forced to make the decision of either being a single mother (that she doesn't want) or having an abortion? Either way, she doesn't have bodily autonomy.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 05:01 PM
1

It's almost as if, preventing these attacks would be better than failing to convict them once they've happened. It would take social change. It would take awareness of the possibilities and unfortunate inevitability that 1/3 will be sexually assaulted (possibly more). Like, hear me out. What if every woman that has been assaulted came together to alert the world that it's more common than non-victims understand? Maybe then, we could have a discussion about what's causing or allowing this to go o…
/r/MensRights25/12/17 04:05 PM
3

So, your life took you through terrible struggles. You're emotionally unstable. And you're bragging about the way you treat people based on that. Sounds like a healthy role model.
/r/TheRedPill11/11/17 07:41 PM
2

And if you look at table 5 in the .PDF, the difference for long term vs short term are negligible for these traits.
/r/TheRedPill22/07/17 04:16 PM
3

OP stated the most significant characteristic was social respect (p=0.81). Is that incorrect?
/r/TheRedPill22/07/17 04:06 PM
2

A p-value of .81? So, no reasonable statistician could accept this as even close to being true.
/r/TheRedPill22/07/17 03:43 PM
29

Circumcision is HEAVILY recommended by doctors in the US. I tried so hard to get my sister to not do it, but her doctor recommended it, and I couldn't get her to research anything before making the decision.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 07:38 PM
-4

The reasons could very easily be biological. Testosterone is a helluva drug. Also, 67.5% of single homeless individuals are male, but only 35% homeless members of households are male . I think that you see men losing big in divorce because you see money and custody as the only losses in divorce. If men make a larger share of the household income, then they lose bigger in divorce. If they work more, then they are not likely to get custody of the children. I wasn't trained to suppress emotion, and…
/r/MensRights13/06/14 05:23 AM
-2

Who would you choose to blame? Is there a reason to blame anyone? I'm saying this info-graphic is a ridiculous way to convince anyone against the prevalence of male privilege.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 05:08 AM
2

Gender roles play a huge part in it. I think the status quo should be automatic split custody. When my parents got divorced, my father was not allowed to sell his house. This was because we were entitled to the money when he passes away. My mom was not allowed to move out of the state. She had main custody and my father had weekend privileges.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 01:42 AM
-1

Also, suicides are a personal choice. I assume the mental health issue rates are higher for men, but they still make the personal choice to not seek help and take their own life.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 01:36 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter