TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

xplodngKeys Archive

View 1 post and 169 comments by xplodngKeys on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
10

Legal RightsxplodngKeys/r/MensRights08/10/21 07:21 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Well then just ask yourself how selfish are you really?
/r/MensRights18/06/22 05:59 PM
0

Well it's based on my biology sooooo.......
/r/MensRights18/06/22 04:07 PM
-2

It's about priorities, self Worth, love, and selflessness. Monogamy isn't our natural state
/r/MensRights18/06/22 04:03 PM
1

Ah, yeah that'll do it. I'm a mellenial.
/r/MensRights18/06/22 02:54 PM
-8

Then why aren't you poly?
/r/MensRights18/06/22 10:34 AM
6

I like sluts
/r/MensRights18/06/22 08:37 AM
1

Well, I mean, you could just go after ambitious girls then...... Unless you're not ambitious enough to tame them, or crazy enough to let them run free.
/r/MensRights18/06/22 08:37 AM
1

That's only a problem in America because you guys are fucking idiots and are funding social security through T-Bills. If you guys got your shit together like the rest of the world then this wouldn't be the case. Here in Communist Canada our national pension plan is fully funded without a single dollar of new equity for the next 75 years. It's fully sustainable.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 10:59 PM
1

I don't know, asset holders can and should be able to do what they see fit with their assets. I personally don't agree with assetholder rent seeking in any market but it is not my place to control others.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 10:55 PM
1

I don't know, asset holders can and should be able to do what they see fit with their assets. I personally don't agree with assetholder rent seeking in any market but it is not my place to control others.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 10:54 PM
1

Agreed. Or your empire is continually expanding through conquest.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 10:25 PM
0

Yeah. Cool. And the same as one guy who got tazed and then died of a heart attack the next day. What's your point? You tried to call me Rambo but here you are advocating storming the building and literally being Rambo. Side note, I could probably inflict a little more damage than those mother's. Maybe I'd be able to take a nose or two. Maybe I'd get tazed first, so I can take a nose or two during booking with my forehead. Sitting in jail isn't fun, so you might as well make it worthwhile.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 05:15 PM
1

Dude, you're trying to pick internet fights and it's not working. Also, if I missed your point then you entirely missed mine. Actually if I was one of those parents in Texas at that school I probably would have started a physical fight with the police.... That's way more my style than John Rambo. Or well, it would start verbally and then the police would police and I wouldn't give a fuck and then escalate right into a jail cell.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 04:55 PM
1

A lot of this would make a tonne of sense to me if you're a Marine. There's nothing cowardly in taking the time to assess a situation you have no responsibility for and determining that the personal risk is too high. Your child will be thankful you saved them from the school shooting, but they'll never fully appreciate what it means to have had your shoulder blown off in the process. They'll never fully understand how life altering that is. They'll never fully understand that maybe you can no lo…
/r/MensRights04/06/22 04:50 PM
0

Yeah you're probably right, if I had decided to join the pointy end of the spear then I'd be commissioned right off the bat... Possibly fastracked to captain depending on the branch & job (in Canada). Although, if I was to enter the service at all it would be in the Navy. I can only stand so much camping and hanging around what's essentially a big parking lot seems boring. I'd want someone trained to do the right thing to do the right thing. I don't want to watch as fools rush in only to throw t…
/r/MensRights04/06/22 04:36 PM
-1

There's nothing cowardly about self preservation and preserving oneself isn't inherently putting yourself ahead of everyone. The fact is, you have to live with yourself, you're #1 responsibility is to your own person... If you can't be responsible for yourself then you can never really be in a position to help others. There's nothing Nobel or virtuous or courageous about running out onto an ice flow by yourself to save someone trapped in the river. That's how you turn 1 victim into 2. These word…
/r/MensRights04/06/22 04:30 PM
2

The only thing that made civilization possible was the induction of farming, particularly grains.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 03:37 PM
1

Right, good, honorable, noble, virtuous..... None of those words imply absolute self sacrafice and many of the words find societal value stemming from concepts like chivalry. Don't pretend that something like self preservation is new or a current symptom of a societal ill. Trying to enforce these ideals or putting a value statement on these ideals does nothing but create division in society.... The same kind of division that's created when you have two types of water fountains.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 03:34 PM
4

.... The same people who always save us, ourselves.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 03:28 PM
1

Honestly speaking, children aren't as valuable to society as teens and adults are. Historically, it's only recently that people have started to give a shit about humans under 5 years old. A lot of this has to do with children actually living past 5yrs with regularity now.... Except for in Texas maybe. If the police don't want to do their job that's their business. If the police want to physically and forcefully prevent individuals (parents) from rescuing their children from a situation that they…
/r/MensRights04/06/22 03:25 PM
5

Yeah, and then you get political leaders saying women are most affected by war. It's rotten from the top.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 03:19 PM
8

Dude..... That's a naive AF assessment of our forefathers. My grandpa went into forestry because that's what paid at the time and put food on the table and kept the roof from leaking. I'm pretty sure neither him, nor his buddies, thought it was heroic to sidestep log fall and to keep your body outside of the equipment. I'm pretty sure my Gramps didn't think it was heroic that his arm went through a plainer in order to make sure my grandma didn't need to work in the 50s.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 03:17 PM
2

The Army fights on its stomach.....
/r/MensRights04/06/22 03:13 PM
4

I'm pretty sure fair compensation for work done isn't male privilege.... Besides, 25 years of service to Rome in the Legion should probably come with some kind of pension.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 03:11 PM
7

I have no idea what your military knowledge is, but a recoilless rifle is a pretty bad day for a tank iirc..... Besides, it's way easier to train someone to shoot a rifle than to fly a jet or drive a tank and that's where conscripts go.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 03:04 PM
8

Since 1799, the common man has been more concerned about putting food on the table than worrying about what elite is going to fuck them over this time. Political activeness isn't a measure of individual industry, it's a measure of personal luxury.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 02:58 PM
66

Why? What responsibility? To what end does the nation state help the common man, when has it ever?
/r/MensRights04/06/22 09:35 AM
38

Sometimes the fight has a very natural boundary and sometimes that boundary is called the preservation of oneself.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 09:34 AM
10

Oh, so like, an egalitarian humanist. So not a feminist at all.
/r/MensRights31/05/22 01:53 PM
1

Citi can't engage in prop trading so that's not possible.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 09:53 PM
5

They're going to give discounted rates to female businesses and favorable lending terms.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 04:07 PM
7

Yeah they do.... It's called getting a pair of work boots and some gloves and then moving skids of lumber and building materials and building waste from A to B to XYZ for 8hrs.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 04:06 PM
4

The support isn't false, Citi Bank is actually doing what they said they would. There's a huge move towards gendered finance happening right now. What's gonna happen is that women, or wom=n >_>, are going to be super over capitalized with the idea that you can just break glass ceilings by pushing through them hard enough. The glass ceiling is execution ability and you can only solve so many problems by throwing money at them. It'll be very very interesting to see what average portfolio returns f…
/r/MensRights30/05/22 04:02 PM
2

100%
/r/MensRights18/05/22 08:42 AM
3

If everyone's doing it then careers won't suffer. From my experience Dad's in other EU countries who don't have the same levels of parental leave wish they did and the only ones giving them grief for it are the boomers. It's kinda ironic, feminists don't want mother's to be impacted at work... So how do you fix that? By letting father's spend time with their children 🤯 Also, you'd think child development would be at the forefront, but it's not, Sandy's career and feeding her Starbucks habit is m…
/r/MensRights17/05/22 02:23 PM
4

Dude..... It's good to be fiscally minded but for the love of God be economically focused - they're different. There's massive intangible benefits to society, the family, and the child for creating strong early bonds with fathers. Giving paternal leave should have nothing to do with the benefits it gives the mother like how feminists support the issue. Parental leave has everything to do with creating strong families and building the relationship between father and child. This is about the child…
/r/MensRights17/05/22 02:17 PM
5

Dude... The risk is going through the divorce process and getting stripped of assets
/r/MensRights13/05/22 04:14 PM
3

This is the way
/r/MensRights12/05/22 04:05 PM
6

Why do you agree with the "my body my choice" school of thought but disagree with the "my life my choice" idea? Why does carrying a child for 9 months hold more weight than paying for a child for 18 years? You're not supportive of forced pregnancy so why be in support of forced parenthood?
/r/MensRights10/05/22 11:41 PM
4

You should also have the right to walk away from a child
/r/MensRights10/05/22 09:47 PM
7

So uhhh.... Get your tubes tied. Make appropriate comparisons
/r/MensRights10/05/22 05:07 PM
0

I mostly agree with you. Perhaps this change won't happen in our lifetimes and maybe not even our children's, but I hold the hope for eventual change. In economics (my background), we've come a long way from Adam Smith and lassaiz-fair economic ideals and Kensyan theories
/r/MensRights29/04/22 09:47 PM
1

Agreed, but I believe they have the potential to change and become a real part of the academic community in advancing knowledge and the understanding of humanity. Imo, right now, they're nothing more than the kid standing outside of the sandbox making mudpies and getting angry that they can't win the sandcastle design competition. I look forward to the day that they step into the sandbox and make a castle.... But at least for now they're within eyesight watching castles being built (maybe).
/r/MensRights29/04/22 07:20 PM
0

Re-read the 4th paragraph
/r/MensRights29/04/22 07:09 PM
2

Me too, me too. I don't like the far sides of the pendulums
/r/MensRights29/04/22 06:00 PM
2

It's really really hard to accurately asses intrinsic value/utility that isn't directly financial. In my mind the best example of the system outside of academia is the venture capital system. 10 investments: 3 go broke, 2 return investment, 2, return some gains, 2 ok gains, 1 Unicron..... Or maybe the unicorn comes every 30 investments.
/r/MensRights29/04/22 05:52 PM
0

Just because they're academically dishonest doesn't mean they don't contribute
/r/MensRights29/04/22 03:14 PM
1

A PhD in any field of study is relevant and of value to society. The PhD is where the pure academics happen and research is pushed. The PhDs are the ones who teach the Masters, who then go on to occasionally teach the bachelors. An undergraduate degree just gives you some basic knowledge in a wide breadth, where do you think you go from here if not to narrow the scope? A PhD in History or music is of value to society. Society is more than bridges and machines and codes. Even the gender studies a…
/r/MensRights29/04/22 03:12 PM
5

Don't move in together. Don't become common law. Maybe have some sort of relationship agreement drafted (cohabitation, whatever) Maybe see if using a corporation to buy real estate is the way to go if you must buy something together.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 06:01 PM
105

I guarantee you're putting in too much effort. Ask them out within 10 messages and only message once or twice a day when you're taking a shit.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 12:25 AM
2

Posts like these used to pop up on r/mgtow2. They're more appropriate over there. Bros need somewhere to express themselves in a welcoming & understanding environment. Relates to equal rights because places like r/against hate got mgtow2 shut down while simultaneously promoting female "safe spaces", aka misandry learning centers. Edit: I have no idea why shit is bolded and I don't care enough to learn the app Edit 2: and now it's not bolded. I give up
/r/MensRights15/04/22 02:21 AM
3

Immigrants increase economic activity. Immigrants are a good thing.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 04:33 PM
11

Creating a family is creating an economic entity with responsibilities. If you can't trust your partner then don't create the entity. Your wealth is going to be risked by the day to day decisions being made in the family. Your mental health will be affected by the decisions made within the family. For the most part, there's very little incentive to find a partner whose actually worth being a partner in my mind. Even if you've known the person for years it's still difficult to judge how things wi…
/r/MensRights14/04/22 02:23 PM
3

That will get you super fucked when it gets found out. Before the Swiss started bowing to American demands for tax information the only time they would release records were in martial disputes.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 02:17 PM
7

Why do I have to give a fuck and suffer the consequences of decisions made by the neuveaux aristocracy?
/r/MensRights14/04/22 01:47 AM
6

It's extra funny because they're so big on intersectionality and having small pots for everyone
/r/MensRights28/03/22 12:34 PM
3

Your username is a master's name
/r/MensRights10/03/22 12:48 AM
3

If I were you I'd rather take my chance on foot in the bush. But that might also be because I'm from the West Coast of Canada and a 20km hike is a nice afternoon. By going the trunk route you're putting yourself directly in a situation where you can be caught. You're relying on chance with no hope of luck if the situation turns. In the bush you can hide and wait people out. You can take your time and you can be careful. Besides, if you get caught they're going to make you walk more than a few do…
/r/MensRights01/03/22 05:57 AM
9

You'd probably have a better chance crossing the border on foot over the mountains by Katyna. Trunks are easy to inspect
/r/MensRights28/02/22 10:29 PM
2

Men don't have to deal with religious bs like having their foreskin cut off?
/r/MensRights24/02/22 02:40 PM
26

Child support should be deposited directly into a custodial account for the child and then any withdraws can scrutinized. Comingleing of assets is terrible
/r/MensRights23/02/22 04:23 PM
13

So because of that women should be financially rewarded? How much should the reward be? One time payment of $10?
/r/MensRights23/02/22 04:21 PM
3

With regard to your financial state: You need to get your mother out of your finances. I'm not too familiar with US banking being Canadian but you should be able to get a personal chequing and savings account. If you don't already have one then go get it. If your current employer has direct deposit then make sure you have that set up rather than the paper cheque route. It'll make your life easier, otherwise just be diligent with mobile deposits or going to an ATM. When your mother asks/demands h…
/r/MensRights21/02/22 04:34 PM
10

That sucks. If I was in your shoes I'd just stop trying and see what happens
/r/MensRights21/02/22 03:59 AM
1

So I can't copy/paste in my app unfortunately but it's your paragraph that starts with Kinsey 1953, the stats are close to the bottom of the paragraph. Also way to keep talking about divorce after you were all "why are you talking about divorce"
/r/MensRights20/02/22 04:07 AM
2

Now whose bringing divorce into it. Reread your 3rd paragraph in the op again before calling someone dumbass. That's where the numbers came from... You gave them to us. You'd think you'd know your own shit better.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 03:23 AM
2

Because I just said divorce instead of cheating/divorce like you said in the comment above. Still doesn't change the math and your lack of understanding it
/r/MensRights20/02/22 03:16 AM
3

And? You're just showing you don't know how to interpret the data and make comparisons within it. The numbers 0-5 have a greater impact than 20-25 because each number at the lower end of the spectrum increases the rate of divorce (infidelity) faster than numbers at the higher end. You didn't specify in the OP but I'd imagine there's an upper bound where the divorce (infidelity) risk plateaus. To keep the percentages consistent with increasing numbers a person would end up having to have sexual p…
/r/MensRights20/02/22 01:16 AM
3

That's not a strawman argument. The comment addresses the post and since the subject matter is numbers based it makes sense to have some mention of 0,1,2... Especially since statistics in the post mention <5 partners. Numbers 0-5 are clearly statically significant, more so than numbers 20-25 according to the data presented.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 01:05 AM
3

I'd argue that this behaviour is actually detrimental. By the time you've invested enough in the relationship to get to the point of sex in this context a lot of time has passed. So much time has passed that I'd argue people fall into a sunk cost fallacy. You have no way of gauging sexual compatibility until you've had sex at least once, more likely twice. This kind of risk averse behavior will also be found in other areas of life, like a 401k filled with bond funds. This could really result in …
/r/MensRights20/02/22 12:59 AM
0

For those of us unmarried into our 30s you just end up with a high body count because of time. Promiscuity is more than just a numbers game.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 12:53 AM
5

It's not true for every field. Sure our footsteps have equal importance, but yours are wrong. A collective basis of formal academic teaching produces higher quality engineers and decreases the time it takes for engineers to effectively work in their field. You'd know this if you went through engineering school and didn't sleep through the history of engineering lectures. Engineering school is different in many regards to other faculties. The biggest difference is that the schools adapt their cur…
/r/MensRights01/02/22 06:30 PM
5

It does mean that because that used to be how engineers were made. I went through engineering school, you clearly didn't, this is something you need to stay in your own lane for.
/r/MensRights01/02/22 05:46 PM
3

Engineering programmes are the most effective way to train engineers.... Who still go out and have 4 years of work experience training/apprenticeships.
/r/MensRights01/02/22 05:36 PM
6

You fail to understand what substantially true means. Substantially true means more or less true with "minor" details being irrelevant. This was a libel claim so all that was determined is the possibility of something happening.
/r/MensRights26/01/22 04:08 PM
2

The power women have in reproduction and sex with respect to abortion is there because "it's not acceptable for a man...". I'm not sure how this is difficult to understand. I'm agreeing with one of the folks in the thread and disagreeing with the other who claims women don't have power with respect to abortion.
/r/MensRights20/01/22 04:32 PM
1

If you're not willing to accept the consequences of sex, you shouldn't be having it at all. Sounds like someone is anti-abortion and anti body autonomy, so I suppose that would be called pro-life. Are you pleased with how Texas is handling the abortion question?
/r/MensRights20/01/22 06:54 AM
11

Perhaps then people of this persuasion should only have sex within the confines of a legally committed relationship
/r/MensRights20/01/22 02:03 AM
-9

I really don't think you understood.... The power being referenced is exactly your stance on the matter allowing men to just opt out of their parental responsibilities because they feel like it is not acceptable.
/r/MensRights20/01/22 01:50 AM
6

While no one owes anyone politeness, the level of politeness you show directly correlates to how much of a dick you are. Faking politeness doesn't make you any less of a dick.
/r/MensRights14/10/21 12:01 AM
3

I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and not attack your willful lack of reading comprehension. I'm against nuisance civil lawsuits, especially where sexual assault is the topic of the suit and the claims of sexual assault have not been proven in a criminal court. Why are you supportive of people having their lives ruined without due process? Why are you arguing so vehemently in support of subverting criminal justice and accountability? Why are you in support of waisting the resources of every…
/r/MensRights08/10/21 04:25 PM
2

Who said I was against civil proceedings? I certainty didn't say it, wait I know who said it - you said it. Why are you trying to drag me into a useless argument that has nothing to do with the article posted? That's.... Weird.
/r/MensRights08/10/21 03:54 PM
2

You keep grasping for straws and you keep coming up short. Why do you support people having their lives ruined by lies and baseless accusations? Why do you think that Jhonny Depp is a woman beater that terrorized Amber Heard?
/r/MensRights08/10/21 03:37 PM
2

I don't think you understand what civil suits and the balance of probabilities are. A 51% threshold is a very very low bar. The courts do not need to decide if my claims are true or not they only need to determine if my claims are possible because I dare not say probable less you contort the meaning. I'm not sure where you're from but in Canada physical assault is criminal, just like sexual assaults. If an assault is found to have occurred then sure, open the door to civil restitution. I'm prett…
/r/MensRights08/10/21 03:20 PM
2

That's the point of civil trials..... Thanks for coming out. Perhaps I should launch a suit against you causing me emotional distress, depression, loss of self worth, and ptsd for your comments. .... Except filling that lawsuit won't cause you to lose your job so I'm also claiming that you drugged and sodomized me. I suppose you think this is just fine
/r/MensRights08/10/21 03:04 PM
3

Civil trials have nothing to do with the law. The law is criminal and civil trials are based on a balance of probabilities where the outcome is determined by president not legislation. This is the third thread I've noticed you stirring the pot unnecessarily.
/r/MensRights08/10/21 02:57 PM
5

This lawsuit is concerning. Sexual assault is serious and criminal, not something to be determined based on a balance of probabilities. Even before determining whether the assault happened or not these two men have lost their job and have had their names in a national publication. If the suit is successful then it could set very concerning precedence.
/r/MensRights08/10/21 08:54 AM
4

https://lmgtfy.app/?q=Australia+boys+apologise+for+masculinity
/r/MensRights05/09/21 07:57 PM
9

That doesn't mean you can't get laid though. Getting laid and getting into a relationship are two totally different things. The whole point of mgtow is to do without the relationship, incels can't get laid... Mgtow ≠ incel
/r/MensRights03/07/21 04:02 AM
15

It's men who don't make, or seek out, relationships with women. You can totally get laid and be mgtow. There's a lot of negative aspects (legally) for men when relationships are concerned and mgtow folks choose not to subject themselves to it.
/r/MensRights03/07/21 03:58 AM
3

China keeps upping the child policy btw, it's now at 3. Funny enough they're experiencing a population decline. So maybe the issue isn't as clear as we might think
/r/MensRights27/06/21 07:31 AM
9

It's funny because semantics are terribly important
/r/MensRights11/06/21 09:13 PM
7

Happy birthday, best wishes for the future
/r/MensRights11/06/21 05:14 AM
2

Given many of the teachers I've had, leaving teaching to teachers doesn't really mean much. Sure you can spend time diving into the pedagogy of this that and the other but it doesn't mean you actually know how to teach or are effective at it.
/r/MGTOW210/06/21 08:02 AM
3

Where the cows eat hay
/r/MensRights06/01/21 11:17 PM
1

They're the cougars I'm currently matching with on tinder 😏 🌈🐻 The biggest privilege card us guys have is that we have a lot of factors going for us as we age. I mean, if I get married before 40, I'm probably going to under value myself (I hope haha). Ah beauty, ever so fleeting, always over bought.
/r/MensRights10/03/20 11:10 PM
2

Well that's a depressingly cynical viewpoint. I'd have to agree I think.
/r/MensRights10/03/20 10:52 PM
1

I think that might be a big function of how monogamy is practiced and formed and found. I mean, in my experience, a lot of women only really want sex in a relationship type environment. So do a lot of men. They end up in a serial monogamy cycle and you can watch their tinder profile start from being happy and hopeful to really jaded over the course of 8 months and 5 relationships and 7 tinder profile reboots. They did it the same way without tinder before, just took longer. Cause at the end of t…
/r/MensRights10/03/20 05:22 PM
1

http://imgur.com/gallery/OXXP1Oc + http://imgur.com/gallery/3nTQvkE I'm sorry for trouble but that description & image was the laugh I needed with coffee
/r/MensRights10/03/20 05:05 PM
1

Ah, I can see where you're coming from. Imo a lot of the arguments are based around poor management and labour that doesn't realise they're actually part of a transaction thus undervalueing their product. For the limitation of resources, I agree in part, but the focus on capitalism is not accurate as it isn't a requirement. Also, some resources really are infinite - like human innovation. I'm not the best English student so I can't think of another word to replace capitalism but it needs to enco…
/r/MensRights10/03/20 04:55 PM
1

Ha! The tone is definitely left of center. & Yeah, too many people undervalue their labour imo
/r/MensRights10/03/20 03:06 PM
2

I think that article is well written and puts forward some interesting points but also leaves a bit to be desired. I don't fully agree with the premise tho. Totally down to discuss, my background is undergrad econ and then I did a Masters in Finance, so might come from a different viewpoint.
/r/MensRights10/03/20 03:05 PM
2

The efficiency of this reply is amazing Imma read with coffee
/r/MensRights10/03/20 02:43 PM
6

I can't acknowledge employment is zero sum. Can you elaborate?
/r/MensRights10/03/20 02:23 PM
9

What's funny is that they're more likely to be abused by other women than by men
/r/MensRights08/03/20 04:26 AM
6

Honestly reading that article and some of the links they sent I got to thinking, so these women that are experiencing DV, maybe a reason is that they're engaging in high risk relationships. In my mind it seems perfectly to fit so many narratives nicely if many of these women experience their DV early in their relationship life... Especially when they're still teasing out their sexuality and can be malevolently manipulated... I left out the part where that would be happening by females, which is …
/r/MensRights07/03/20 03:30 AM
10

I just got banned from the subreddit..... Apparently I'm queer bashing and being prejudice against women.. or something, I can't remember what the comment was but now I can't reply so yeah Edit: They were reframing the argument every chance they got. It was crazy
/r/MensRights07/03/20 02:57 AM
7

Omg omg omg.... I'm gonna do it. But first I need me some linkable statistics Edit: I have found me some statistics. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01506/full Will report back lol Edit 2: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/felgfj/intimate_partner_violence/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share
/r/MensRights06/03/20 10:19 PM
7

Just some casual dyslexia Kinda funny how lesbians are highest though
/r/MensRights06/03/20 05:25 PM
0

Please stop the hateful misandrist propaganda or I will block you. Lamooo hateful misandrist propaganda?? I've literally never had that criticism before. Get bent dude. You're just as bad as the feminists you hate. You should block me and live in your echo chamber. article you cherry picked Literally the top result on Google. Literally cherry picked quotes and represented them. Whose the propagandists now? Go to /r/TwoXChromosomes and type "prenup" into the search box. Now enjoy the rage posts. …
/r/MensRights04/03/20 04:13 AM
0

Yes, it all does and the Barron's article you cherry picked does as well. You can protect this stuff, it's why you pay trust and family lawyers so much. You're looking at their caviets and cautions from the negative, as if they're insurmountable. They're solvable problems, all of them. Family law is written to provide a basic framework that everyone can use with the idea than the household unit is equitable. Simply put, if you don't some of your income being apart of the household then, just, do…
/r/MensRights04/03/20 01:58 AM
2

This is probably a difference between Canadian and American law. Trusts work. Prenups work. There's a lot you can do to not get fucked if you think ahead, no one thinks ahead. Also, if most of your net worth is in your house you're doing finances wrong. Marriage is a rip off for whomever the more economically valuable partner is. My parents divorced. My father is a leech, he has half my mother's pension. He doesn't deserve the pension. He got half the value of the house, he doesn't deserve it. P…
/r/MensRights04/03/20 12:49 AM
-6

The women has the same obligations as the man.... ... And if you're worried about losing half your shit then put it in a trust. If you can't be bothered to put it in a trust then you didn't have enough shit to lose to begin with
/r/MensRights03/03/20 11:45 PM
0

Why didn't anyone just take a piss on the wall? Like that's a long fucking line
/r/MensRights01/03/20 08:49 PM
17

This guy nightclubs Also vodka soda because you can't make enough in cover alone
/r/MensRights01/03/20 08:48 PM
1

I'm not sure how you went from making a well written post to shelving reading comprehension and arguing points that aren't even in the same ballpark as the ones presented even if they were taken to their logical extreme but you did. Well done.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 11:39 PM
1

Then please point this out to me and show me how it's different than all us little whores finding each other without going to sex clubs. Sex clubs, or things similar, are nothing close to new. In my mind there's just increased access. I'm not going to accept the idea of sexual liberation because the constraints in North America we're heavily influenced by Victorian middle class who were themselves an oddity, albeit a majority. Most of modern feminism comes from these roots and they just go on to…
/r/MensRights25/02/20 09:14 PM
8

Well put. One thing I've been thinking about is "hookup culture" and I'm beginning to think there isn't one... It's just people like sex and the internet has made it easier to find like minded people
/r/MensRights25/02/20 03:01 PM
41

Oh don't worry, I don't do this and never ever plan to... Gotta exercise my privilege somehow
/r/MensRights25/02/20 01:37 AM
2

Can't be bothered even wiping my nose with a good for nothin job stealin tissue
/r/MensRights24/02/20 09:08 PM
8

I can turn anything into a slur, bring it on bitches!
/r/MensRights24/02/20 07:35 PM
3

Everyone knows Cummins is where it's at, even the ol'bird
/r/MensRights24/02/20 07:31 PM
17

Some would call it the Royal Flush, but I prefer to think of it as the Royal Parachute
/r/MensRights23/02/20 09:35 PM
0

!remindme 7 days
/r/MensRights23/02/20 09:19 PM
7

Oh so like..... It's just business yo
/r/MensRights23/02/20 09:17 PM
8

You just haven't found the right women yet
/r/MensRights20/02/20 05:16 AM
2

I gotta mention, I was dating a Parisian girl for a little while and she was a saint. We're still really good friends. .. but I totally know what you mean about French girls
/r/MensRights19/02/20 11:29 PM
10

If you wanna be dehumanized check out Eastern European white women Although I feel like that's their way of showing love, like huskys, and they just wanna test it often. I've never been in a relationship with a Middle Eastern girl, but Persian is close enough, and I just felt the basic level of interaction was better and more thoughtful. Although, I think they equally enjoy the fact that I'm appalled they need permission to go shopping back in Tehran. The world is funny yo
/r/MensRights19/02/20 04:41 PM
9

Commenting on the First Nations part, I've noticed in the last 5 or 6 years the general attitude in Vancouver has become wayyyy more inclusive. What I mean is that I rarely hear any racist comments anymore and are starting to see more and more First Nations in my daily life - shop keepers, hospitality workers, etc. I honestly think these pipeline protests are taking a huuuugggeeeee step backwards in terms of cultural understanding. Not a lot of people know the difference between hereditary and e…
/r/MensRights19/02/20 04:33 PM
20

So..... Like all of them?
/r/MensRights14/02/20 03:20 AM
1

Oh haha yeah
/r/MensRights06/02/20 06:17 PM
2

The stats might be skewed for couples who aren't legally coupled
/r/MensRights06/02/20 01:54 AM
0

Because children need twice the rape that's why
/r/MensRights06/02/20 01:52 AM
2

Not listed as the father at birth I assume
/r/MensRights06/02/20 01:51 AM
2

It's like feminists never really opened a history book and looked up suffrage. By the time the suffragettes came about men hadn't even had the right to vote for less than 100 years in the most advanced Democratic country. It isn't a gender thing, it's a total upheaval of the political and governmental power structure. If you were in charge at the time denying the vote to half the citizenry isn't mysogenist it's self preservation.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 01:47 AM
1

The argument isn't based on isms and was resolved like 3 comments ago. MRA is sexiest, yes. Feminism is sexist, yes. We don't need to get into how MRA is a direct result of feminism but whatever. What Feminism strives for, how they define themselves, is to be humanist... Except they're not, because that would mandate equality.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 01:41 AM
1

Omg I just learned a new word! ... That could be said about me often... I have mixed emotions. How unsociable do you need to be to not be sociable enough to be gay?!? "Sorry Fredrik, you haven't seen another human in 7 years. Also, we do not accept applications submitted by carrier pigeon."
/r/MensRights31/01/20 09:22 PM
1

I have heard this, also I think I only know of 1 lesbian. They must be crazy insulated
/r/MensRights31/01/20 10:03 AM
3

Oh buddy, not to make light of it, but to totally make light of it, that's gotta fucking suck to be all... "Closest, door, open, hello world I'm me!" Then find a group that's "hey! Come chill with us, we'll help champion you and give you support". And thennnn... "But you can only have support after Jessica and Karen, Karen used to be a man" I'll fight for your right to party
/r/MensRights30/01/20 05:34 PM
5

Doing their part to close the wage gap!
/r/MensRights30/01/20 05:25 PM
1

About the paralells of 3rd wave feminism and the Empire? I'm down! The blockade of Naboo and Senate inaction is just like the "debate" of reproductive health. There shouldn't be one. There should be an agreed upon date that abortions can happen until, I'm not sure what that is but it's at least birth -1 day, and then everyone should shut up and get on with their lives. Butttttt!!!!! All this commotion is allowing focus to be pulled away from real issues, like equality. Ironically. And storm troo…
/r/MensRights29/01/20 07:15 PM
0

I prefer to view it as a kink that both of us can jump in on. When I'm drinking she's taking advantage of me and my inability to consent. When she's making breakfast, it's not rape if you yell surprise first before round 2 kitchen sex is it? Gotta live dangerously and on the edge my friend, it's where all the fun is. Although, a false accusation would be mildly annoying. Definitely don't have time for that much paperwork
/r/MensRights29/01/20 04:55 PM
3

+1 on the manic daddy issues.... That... Was.... Fun? Or at least part of it was. I've had a lot of luck with athletes, some of them were feminist. All I can say is that it's like they have angry sex all the time
/r/MensRights29/01/20 11:15 AM
1

I see you've never had a Tahiti sword fight
/r/MensRights29/01/20 11:08 AM
1

What if they're just fun to fuck?
/r/MensRights29/01/20 09:36 AM
11

gets off the couch, tightens the belt Boys, get me a few beers. I have a point to prove
/r/MensRights29/01/20 09:34 AM
1

I donno man, I'm just quoting star wars because emperor palpitine seemed like a good reply... Then I was worried you didn't get it or I didn't recognize where your reply came from so I quoted Yoda.
/r/MensRights29/01/20 08:27 AM
1

Fear is the path to the dark side. Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering.
/r/MensRights29/01/20 02:42 AM
2

Good! Use your aggressive feelings, let the hate flow through you
/r/MensRights29/01/20 02:21 AM
3

We're surrounded. That simplifies the problem.
/r/MensRights29/01/20 02:20 AM
1

Reddit is awesome, basically everyone is on Reddit. Now if this was 4chan you could have an argument
/r/MensRights01/07/17 06:13 PM
1

but I do work on The Street ....
/r/MensRights01/07/17 02:56 PM
14

Wait... so rabbis are giving newborns blowjobs and no one said anything?!!?!?!?
/r/MensRights03/06/17 06:33 PM
1

If you want to win at sex, get an undergrad in economics focusing on game theory
/r/MensRights03/06/17 06:31 PM
2

I only support Men's Rights because I support Woman's Rights. I'm a humanist and I think ya'll are fucking nuts
/r/MensRights03/06/17 06:29 PM
1

William_F0ster .... 01:13 shows you dont work on wall street, 2:22 shows a lack of lateral thinking, 02:56 makes me think you support Occupy Wall Street
/r/MensRights03/06/17 06:27 PM
2

Excellent subject matter but terribly tackless execution. Also, you missed the key value points of your own message which is unfortunate because I think your audience will look at the lipstick instead of the game the pigs are playing.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 06:25 PM
3

Humanism is ready to accept all the femminist refugees
/r/MensRights03/06/17 04:39 PM
6

Its funny because they routinely give zero fucks about semantics
/r/MensRights03/06/17 04:38 PM
1

I see where you're going with that qualification ;)
/r/MensRights03/06/17 04:36 PM
2

If you're recognized a systemic problem and you have the ability to fix it then you should. Reddit never has been friendly to searching like other forums, I think it has to do with the rate at which posts are made. The community is just huge. Also, there can be definite value to have multiple threads - especially in multiple subreddits
/r/MensRights03/06/17 04:34 PM
1

the continent you're on. Funny enough, its engineering that gets pushed down to the level of a glorified trade globally
/r/MensRights03/06/17 04:30 PM
1

not to mention that if everyone got a STEM degree our society would turn into a technological Sparta. I hear Greece still hasnt figured out their finance, maybe they can ask Sparta for help
/r/MensRights03/06/17 04:29 PM
3

As someone with a degree in History, the comment didn't phase me at all. My degree is basically useless in terms of marketability. Idgaf, books were cool
/r/MensRights03/06/17 04:27 PM
1

We live in an ideal world if you know how to create it. Just engineer the shit out of it
/r/MensRights03/06/17 04:26 PM
1

There is an engineering circlejerk on reddit Yeah man, ERTW
/r/MensRights03/06/17 04:25 PM
3

I'm willing to bet Autonomy and self determination weren't the reasons why women in CS were low initially and then slowly moved up to engineering numbers. It has more to do with economics and education within the school of engineering than anything even closely related to gender
/r/MensRights03/06/17 04:23 PM
4

"Yes, computing moved from secretarial to non-secretarial work but it takes some impressive mental gymnastics to think that women were the ones deciding they would only do secretarial work." Not really, under that scenario a likely example is that the work moved beyond their skillset and they made the economic decision that gaining this skillset was not valuable. I'm not sure you're going to be able to argue that middle managers were using poor HR practices to create an industry wide systemic im…
/r/MensRights03/06/17 04:20 PM
2

My theory is that this "by nature" is a byproduct of how the field is taught in University. University tries to take programming and make it into a science when really what you're doing is creating art. They have it backwards, and I believe, if the approach to teaching the subject became more design based then more women would enter the field.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 04:18 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter