TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

xseeks Archive

View 0 posts and 76 comments by xseeks on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

By 15 or 16, I'd argue that most in fact do know better. I know I did. Whether or not they'll give a shit is another matter, one that extends far into adulthood.
/r/MensRights03/09/20 04:52 AM
-11

I feel like calling this 'abuse' is abusing the term 'abuse'. Male or female.
/r/MensRights24/11/19 09:18 AM
1

Read the post again and show me where I said it wasn't.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 06:27 AM
0

Yeah, it seems like this sub goes a bit apeshit with pedo accusations sometimes. Feels a bit like grasping at straws. Even in California, this still wouldn't be pedophilia by any technical or legal definition.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 08:46 PM
21

Oh god, what have I done
/r/MensRights11/12/18 12:34 PM
18

tl;dr version, I imagine, is fear on her part. Combined with likely substance abuse (keeping her fuzzy-headed), she's less motivated to leave than to just weather the storm. Or at least, that's how I imagine the logic to go.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 12:00 PM
43

The villain was her piece of shit pimp "Kut-Throat." Not to mention, you know, her.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 11:56 AM
3

Yeah, as fun as those subs can be, that's something that gets on my nerves a bit, treating everyone who isn't particularly well-educated in your field as if they were just generally stupid. I say this as a former IT guy.
/r/MensRights23/12/17 08:49 AM
2

On the one hand, she's a despicable human being. On the other hand, that's some pretty excellent punmanship if it's intentional.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 06:22 PM
6

Seriously, wtf is going on? Is this place being brigaded or something?
/r/MensRights14/12/16 07:27 AM
5

The guys who run Humble Bundle (Wolfire games) are headed by fairly staunch SJWs who got their panties in a serious bunch when Gamergate was starting out. I doubt very much that they'd mind at all that their charities are racist in this particular way. That being said, as others have pointed out, the users are given the option to exclude specific charities from receiving any of the payment at their leisure.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 07:49 AM
8

Let's be fair here, they might just have been assholes.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 09:36 AM
6

Yes, I would ask that if the genders were reversed. And I'm going to have to strongly disagree that sixteen isn't old enough to decide if you want to fuck someone.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 11:54 AM
22

Was it rape rape, or "well, he's sixteen so we'll call it rape" rape?
/r/MensRights08/05/16 11:11 AM
6

I agree, 'cult' is better I think. Edit: Nevermind, replied to the wrong thing. My bad.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 12:52 AM
3

It's good that you're writing but I wouldn't expect it to have much of an effect. This article goes into how fraudulent Vice appears to be.
/r/MensRights24/12/15 11:10 AM
-1

Seriously. I wish people would stop acting like banging a fifteen year old is anything like raping a six year old. It's gotten to the point where if they use the word 'minor' rather than 'child', I honestly don't care anymore. Let them do what they want.
/r/MensRights23/12/15 06:25 AM
4

Jesus, these Koreans speak English better than I do. What am I doing with my life.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 06:50 AM
1

The guards would presumably have weapons, unless the linked article specifically states otherwise (didn't read it).
/r/MensRights14/09/15 02:40 AM
1

I'm not disagreeing with most of that really, but people are going to act in their own best interest. If the country is still worth defending, great. If it isn't, go elsewhere. The refugees have chosen option B (assuming of course that it's as simple as presented). I'm not saying anyone should feel obligated to take them in, unless deals have already been struck or something like that. I'm just saying there there is a problem with discriminating based on gender. Let the men in too or turn them a…
/r/MensRights08/09/15 02:59 PM
2

You can make that argument for places that don't suck, sure, but I wouldn't risk a 12-pack of Diet Dr. Pepper for that shithole, let alone my life. Why bash your head against the rocks for the rest of your life when far better opportunities for you and yours already exist? A person can put up with a lot of shit but if the options are 'crap' or 'crap plus death', I'd seek a third. I'm not saying they're entitled to anything, mind you, but if you're going to prevent people from entering your count…
/r/MensRights08/09/15 01:52 PM
6

He's not talking about sterilization. Just keep the women from getting pregnant during deployment and you're good to go.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 12:35 AM
11

I don't even think ~300 years ago would have been a huge problem in most of America. Thomas Paine was an atheist, after all.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 08:42 AM
20

Pretty good article if you can ignore all the Jesus stuff.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 10:51 PM
1

Not really, I was considering posting something similar until I saw his comment.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 10:50 PM
1

First, if you're going to respond to something, don't alter it first. Second, yes, context matters. Especially when we're talking about sexual function and not assault.
/r/MensRights17/10/14 01:54 AM
1

One issue with the conclusion that I would argue right off the bat is one of volume. 22,000 nerve endings spread over how many mm of flesh cubed versus the volume of the glans clitorous, specifically. 22k doesn't mean much without context. As for the rest of the post... that's quite a lot of material. I'll give it a look when I have a bit more free time, so thanks.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 04:15 AM
1

Also, your understanding of harm is very limited. No, it's different from yours. Sorry if that upsets you, though given how broad your cognitive landscape is I'm sure it doesn't. Also, the worst kind of genital mutilations are inflicted on men and no women. Irrelevant, since once again I'm not advocating for any of that.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 04:11 AM
1

You can stroke the shaft, you know. Hell, I barely even touch the head when I'm jerking off.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 03:49 AM
-2

I'm reducing this to sexuality because anything else is obviously beyond the pale, so to speak, and not even worth considering - other than for consenting adults who wish to mutilate themselves for whatever reasons. As for which causes more harm, judging by the sources you linked in your other post I'd say it's pretty clear that women (specifically those getting the 'type III' treatment) are most greatly harmed, with a notably increased potential for long-term health effects not including the ad…
/r/MensRights14/10/14 12:40 PM
-1

I never claimed 'Y' wasn't bad, so please stop trying to misrepresent my argument. Use your brain to copy/paste this as a reply to your other comment since it's basically the same thing.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 12:27 PM
-2

That would be an excellent point if I hadn't already stated the exact opposite in the post to which you're replying, but good try anyway. Also, equating circumcision to Hitler? I'm glad we're keeping things in perspective in this thread.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 05:40 AM
-2

Let's be realistic here, there's a striking difference between cutting off a flap of skin and carving off someone's clit. If they were snipping off the glans itself it would be a more apt comparison. I'm not saying it's right to force people to do it, but pretending that it's exactly the same when it very obviously isn't won't help to establish credibility.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 01:16 AM
1

I don't see why they couldn't.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 07:29 AM
1

Holy shit. Is that Boxxie (sp?)?
/r/MensRights05/08/14 07:58 AM
14

While I agree that the police (probably) shouldn't be getting involved, I disagree about a woman's breasts being the same thing as pecs. Maybe you think they should be, but that's irrelevant. There are mutliple categories of porn focusing on tits, and none whatsoever to pecs, because nobody gives a shit about pecs unless they're man-boobs, in which case it's a negative.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 04:03 AM
2

His comment doesn't dispute anything here. We're all in agreement that there's a pretty terrible double-standard at play. I just think it's best not to overstate the facts, both in general and because 'colorful' phrasing paints a sometimes-skewed version of reality. It's a game played by feminists and their ilk, and I think the MRM needs to be better than that.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 03:58 AM
11

Why are people downvoting this? Honest question. Is it factually inaccurate or are we just angry at the guy who isn't mad enough?
/r/MensRights09/07/14 03:02 AM
18

to/10, would not keep.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 09:47 AM
57

There was no issue at all until she decided to create one.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 04:52 AM
0

I took the comment as meaning "we're not the same," for what it's worth. I could be wrong, though. I hope I'm not, because otherwise I'd have to wonder if this sub is being raided again.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 06:12 PM
3

Well, technically, he did give her the sperm. Next time he'll be smarter about it and write up a contract first.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 03:25 PM
3

Anyone have a mirror? Edit: Nevermind, it's working again.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 09:12 AM
7

I don't think anyone would disagree with that. Asking someone else (an employer, say) to foot the bill for it is a different matter.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 07:32 AM
1

She's one of the most famous actresses currently living. She doesn't take a shit without it being a matter of public record.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 02:34 PM
8

The problem is that she's a hypocrite who says you shouldn't publicly shame people for being fat, and then went and publicly shamed Christian Bale for being fat.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 07:26 PM
10

Stuff like fake rape reports? Yeah. That ain't winning you guys any sympathy. Evidence?
/r/MensRights19/12/13 07:50 PM
13

I would put the percentage of (western) women whose worldviews have been significantly shaped by feminism far higher than 1%. I'd say more like 50%+. That's not to say that they're all feminists to the bone, but on first blush, that tends to be how their opinions shake out in my experience.
/r/MensRights24/10/13 08:07 PM
2

I'm beginning to love Judgy Bitch. I guess that makes me an asshole.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 02:29 PM
8

What I'm saying is that any reason for a person's deficiencies is irrelevant; it's the deficiency itself that matters. The military doesn't exist to elevate a person's sense of self-worth, it exists to fight wars.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 06:57 AM
8

You're arguing that standards should be lowered to meet an applicant's natural physical inequities. Those standards exist for a reason. Standards are called as such because they're standard across the entire spectrum; they need to be, and should in no way be subject to political pressures from any group. I'm a fat motherfucker with bad knees; should the military drastically lower its 'standards' to accommodate me as well?
/r/MensRights13/10/13 06:30 AM
17

I think I agree with you. Personally, I'd have women still signing up but being in different combat roles, or whatever they can handle. Not everyone can hack it with the best of them (myself for instance), but that doesn't mean they can't be useful somewhere. I think the problem here is women's groups bitching about how women aren't in all the same roles, regardless of whether that's an appropriate place for them or not.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 06:23 AM
0

Yeah, he had me up until he started going on about casually cheating on women like it's just a given. Had to stop watching; too bad.
/r/MensRights04/10/13 02:32 PM
13

You don't shoot someone when you're not sure if you should shoot. If you're shooting, it's because you're sure you need to kill a motherfucker. Unless you're an idiot who makes a habit of doing incredibly reckless and harmful things, in which case, you shoot yourself instead and do the world a favor.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 02:35 AM
3

Initially, I was skeptical of this data on its own, but after looking at this form: http://www.bls.gov/news.release/wkyeng.t02.htm, and dividing weekly earnings by hours worked, it seems women do indeed make slightly more. Women: 19.3 Men: 18.9 Either way, about 19/hr. I'm not terribly familiar with that site, though, so feel free to correct me, point out things I missed, provide more appropriate forms, etc.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 10:49 PM
9

I'm not sure that I agree with a sexbot rendering women 'obsolete', unless literally the only thing you're getting from said woman is sex. ...unless this comment was tongue-in-cheek. In which case, nevermind, carry on.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 01:29 PM
12

Is this actual rape, or "He's fifteen so we're going to call sex rape" rape?
/r/MensRights13/07/13 10:54 PM
5

I think the easiest way to administer child support is: Whoever has the kid supports the kid.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 08:52 AM
3

I do weirder things every day. I don't doubt it for a second.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 08:45 AM
2

I came here to say basically this, except probably with fewer words. There are some jobs for which men are just better suited. Until we have robot slaves doing everything for us, that's never going to change.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 01:42 PM
28

What fucking universe do you live in where the courts won't force him to pay child support for that child? This bitch deliberately got herself pregnant while pretending to be on the pill. OP did absolutely nothing wrong. Was it a nice thing? Is she going to be a happy camper? No, of course not. Too fucking bad. It's a situation she created, and now she can sleep in the bed she's made.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 04:23 AM
21

The main difference between this poster and that movement is that this poster does not specifically target any demographic. It makes a huge difference.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 09:03 PM
19

I will happily admit to looking at both faces and bodies.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 04:18 AM
18

I know this is going to sound like pointless political correctness to some, but I think it's important to remember this. Not every MRA is a man. The only reason I learned about this whole 'MRM' dealie is because of GirlWritesWhat.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 04:14 AM
15

SendGrid? I'm pretty sure those are those "Windows" guys, right?
/r/MensRights21/03/13 07:18 PM
3

In theory, I mostly agree with you -- other than your assertion that a person without a job has 'nothing to talk about'. Frankly, unless they're in some creative field (movies, music, books, etc.), what a person does for their money is about the last thing I give a shit about. In practice, most of the women I know (note that I'm not using the word 'friends') who aren't themselves independently wealthy want it both ways: It's absurd that she should have to support a deadbeat loser, but expected t…
/r/MensRights19/03/13 06:42 AM
1

I actually have done informal surveys, yes, if that's what you want to call asking women their opinions on things. Also, I never said that the only thing women care about is money, but feel free to continue knocking down those strawmen you've built.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 06:24 AM
3

I literally cannot name one woman who would date a jobless man.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 06:03 AM
9

I hate to say this, but the other video is pretty weak. Rather than refuting the core assertions that Anita makes, as is the proper thing to do, this guy accepts them as valid and instead goes for the "look at these other games that don't do this" approach, which is a losing proposition right from the start.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 06:40 PM
-1

Not to mention a hyper-feminist court system that constantly moves the goalpost to better suit women.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 05:00 PM
18

How is a waiver of child support an unconscionable clause, exactly? She knew it was there before she signed it. This is my problem with shit like this. "We don't like it, so... it doesn't count."
/r/MensRights11/03/13 04:57 PM
11

Seriously. This isn't nice, but neither does it belong on r/MensRights.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 07:42 AM
-7

Franky speaking, I think having the guy handle it is probably the better solution in this situation. I don't think she's wrong in her assertion that, when taking orders from a stranger, it's a bit easier to ignore a woman than it is a man. It depends on the man (and woman) in question of course, but as a generality I don't think many people can disagree with this if they're being honest. That being said, I doubt it's in your job description. Ask to take turns removing crazies, or ask to be paid …
/r/MensRights23/01/13 05:38 PM
6

This post gave me hope, which was nice. And then I realized that in nearly 30 years of life, I've never once met a woman who thinks this way, with the possible exception of my mother. Aaaand now I'm right back down again.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 02:16 AM
3

Kinda perturbed that I agree with a dude named NIGGER_JEW_HOT_ASS.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 02:13 AM
1

Not a huge surprise; feminists have supplanted 'relying on a man' with relying on the state. It's not an accident that young, single women vote overwhelmingly Democrat.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 07:27 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter