TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

xthesaintx Archive

View 0 posts and 34 comments by xthesaintx on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

That would be because fathers day is 2 September here
/r/MensRights17/06/18 10:06 PM
2

self flagellation at its finest
/r/MensRights11/03/18 11:25 PM
6

Interesting as it's a pretty gender blind disease, apart from gestational diabetes. https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pdfs/data/statistics/national-diabetes-statistics-report.pdf
/r/MensRights14/11/17 10:09 PM
-2

Not to be that guy, but battery, assault is the threat of violence, battery is the actual violence.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 10:22 PM
1

Isn't this just a rehash of "Very Bad Things"?
/r/MensRights20/06/17 11:07 PM
1

To be fair the bloke is a joke, he's a has been game show host.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 01:33 AM
2

I think refer to the man is an idiot if he goes there without a condom, you can't come in someone and act surprised if they get knocked up. If it's through deception by lying about being on the pill etc, well there should be recourse, but I don't know what that is or how it could be measured or tested, as well the pill isn't 100% either. Honesty is the best policy, especially when it comes to breakages, I mean shit happens, trying to hide it or cover it up, well then you're going to creep out th…
/r/MensRights22/05/17 01:13 AM
3

That's a tricky one, the removal or tampering with a condom is a direct act that changes the conditions of consent. Both agreeing to sex but with protection. Blatantly lying about being on the pill for example and the man deciding to go there unsheathed, well the man is an idiot for not taking responsibility for his own contraception and sexual health. The woman hasn't changed the terms of consent per say, as in they are both agreeing to unprotected sex. I think there should be recourse in that …
/r/MensRights22/05/17 12:59 AM
3

Yup, and IMO I think does constitute sexual assault, as does women poking holes in condoms. As no consent is given.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 12:51 AM
3

stealthing Removing the rubber half way through.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 11:28 PM
2

Meh, when I was at high school (in New Zealand) trousers were made optional for girls in 1994. It was in Dunedin, so quite chilly in the winter. And in fact if I remember correctly, girls prior to the introduction to Kilt wore either a grey skirt or trousers in the 80s.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 12:08 AM
1

I'm not condoning running from the police, but why stick around with your attacker for the police to turn up?
/r/MensRights20/12/16 10:22 AM
1

There is nothing to be gained by sticking around for the police.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 08:39 PM
3

I've done the below map scale recoloured to match the FGM scale roughly too
/r/MensRights16/12/16 01:35 AM
2

here is a quick recolour of the map edit: converted the map from CMYK to RGB to get rid of the freaky cyan
/r/MensRights16/12/16 01:21 AM
1

Builds narrative that fits in with world view. Someone points out narrative is misinformed. Deflects
/r/MensRights10/11/16 11:19 PM
4

Well I guess you like the TV with the mute on too? The foreskin contains 10k-20k(70k in a current study) nerve endings, by comparison the penis glans only contains about 4k, so you advocate removing the most erogenous part of your penis. Incidentally the clitoris only contains about 8k, so the removal of that is less damaging, nerve wise, than foreskin removal.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 06:46 PM
24

As a man who interacts with the genitals of other women, I prefer the nerve loaded protective skin removed from their vagina
/r/MensRights04/11/16 11:25 AM
2

In NZ women can't "rape" legally speaking, they can commit sexual assault etc which all have lower sentences than rape.
/r/MensRights31/10/16 09:48 PM
1

Not really. Poe's law insinuates the reader is at fault. In this case it's a bit like a white supremacist writing an article about how minorities are inferior, and saying hey guys it's just satire.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 12:01 PM
10

I was 50/50 wether or not it was... But can you genuinely call something satire if it's the same tone as regular transmission?
/r/MensRights19/08/16 05:37 AM
35

Point that out is typical mansplaining.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 03:54 AM
48

I saw jezzebel refused to review no mans sky because of the name, no great loss to the world
/r/MensRights19/08/16 02:00 AM
1

Women can't rape, legally that is, which is why it's even more pathetic.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 02:03 AM
1

It can cause respiratory distress in young children by irritating the airways and increasing mucus production. So imagine a small child or baby who has small airways to begin with and they are probably inflamed and producing mucus because of a cold, and then you go an irritate them further with Vicks, recipe for disaster, it can severely narrow the airways, children go to hospital due to use of this product making them unable to breathe.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 12:29 AM
9

So so so not safe for children
/r/MensRights15/02/16 12:00 AM
7

Just because you say you're a doctor or expert on the internet doesn't make you one. I don't really know how to reply to your second paragraph apart from you are a fucking grade a moron that if your PhD is medical real and valid for you to practice, god help your patients.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 03:36 PM
10

I never understand these statements, you know the foreskin slides back right!? So like when fully erect there are no flappy bits of skin, so like smooth shaft to glans, no rolled turtle next etc.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 03:26 PM
6

The whole infection thing is the medical community trying to justify their practice... The foreskin is not just extra skin, it's nerve endings and protection and a sterile environment. It's as much extra skin as a woman's labia is a flappy bit that needs a chop.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 03:18 PM
5

You're missing the point, it shouldn't be allowed at all, unless there are serious medical reasons, it's a nerve ending dense area of skin that lubricates and keeps the head sterile, as well as completely changing sexual intimacy later in life. There are no good reasons for circumcisions, male or female, only selfish short sighted ones.... And yes I will agree one is more invasive surgically than the other, but one has for so long been seen as "oh it's nothing get over it" your lack of empathy i…
/r/MensRights30/07/15 03:14 PM
1

I dunno, I mean yeah a year is a long time, but I also wonder how many people would actually take the whole time off? or how they'd spread it? I know I'm not functioning at 100% at work at the moment, I've had two weeks off and have been back for two now. I'd hate to think how mush my brain would be if I went straight to work, plus having bonding time with your child is important for BOTH sexes.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 01:50 AM
1

begrudging someone or a group of people a benefit because others may not qualify and does not affect them (negatively or positively) is a pretty weak school yard "but I wannna ice cream" statement.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 01:42 AM
8

I get 10 weeks paid leave from my employer (nothing from the government (NZ) apart from 2 weeks unpaid woop). My wife is self(un)employed so she's not really entitled to much at all, fair enough, so it's great I'm able to spend time with my little fella and us not have to worry about a pay check... Even better I'm able to spread the 10 weeks over a year, so I don't have to worry about my projects at work being handed over to others, and I don't drive my wife insane by being home 24/7 for 10 week…
/r/MensRights08/06/15 11:52 PM
7

eh it's a private company they can do what they want, he offers his personal staff (of about 170) unlimited holidays.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 11:48 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter