TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

xxyyzz987 Archive

View 0 posts and 49 comments by xxyyzz987 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Going to HR could backfire. Only do it if you don’t mind being put on the spot there – both officially and unofficially – because word will get round that you’ve accused a ‘saintly’ woman of sexism. Don’t treat women well; treat them correctly and with strict distance. Personal gifts have no place in a company. That’s not your business. As you can see, it just ends up annoying you. This behaviour only leads to your goodwill being taken for granted, to you being taken advantage of, and to you har…
/r/MensRights25/07/26 01:39 PM
7

This is the standard list that applies in many countries. Gender bias is a widespread phenomenon.
/r/MensRights10/06/26 08:08 AM
4

There is no hope for the current generation of adolescents. The media have become deeply entrenched in hatred; this has been going on not just for years, but for decades. The generation that follows will face entirely different problems, and there will be a shift away from this; the momentum for agitation against men and boys will run out of steam. In the worst-case scenario, the pendulum will swing back; many ‘antibodies’ will have formed amongst men, and that alone will make for a very, very u…
/r/MensRights19/05/26 12:31 PM
3

Changing rooms in clothes shops aren’t gender-specific here. They’re just changing rooms. But if a shop starts doing that sort of thing and makes it difficult for me to use a changing room – for whatever reason – then I’ll politely say “goodbye” and leave the shop, never to return.
/r/MensRights08/05/26 05:51 PM
6

Ignoring women is not an invention of any religion; anyone can do it, and it has existed throughout history. I don't want to ignore women, and I don't want to have to look away. I want them to behave like human beings, which they no longer do almost anywhere in the world.
/r/MensRights07/02/26 01:43 PM
9

That's right. It's an effect that can be seen worldwide. The right wing wants to exploit us in wars, at work, and in alimony laws. The left wing castrates us, disenfranchises us, and turns us into servants of whatever groups are currently considered victims. To hell with all of you.
/r/MensRights19/01/26 10:22 AM
2

That's not even the case everywhere in the West. Here (in a Western European country), the question of “who pays on a date” is pretty unimportant. It's only in exceptional cases that you go out to eat with your date; it's much more common to meet up without such grand gestures, for example in a café in the park, where everyone gets what they want at the counter and, of course, pays for their own things. A man who generously invites someone to a full meal would be suspected of having ulterior mot…
/r/MensRights15/01/26 01:25 PM
10

It won't help you, but as a European man in Europe, I feel the same way: that we are ‘incompetent,’ ‘creepy,’ “worthless” and ‘inferior men.’ Books that celebrate how women get rid of, eliminate and kill men are successful. Violence protection laws automatically make me the perpetrator, no matter what happened. What you are experiencing is not Indian, it is global. Here, too, women enjoy all the privileges, with only men in deadly professions, alimony for women after divorce, custody of children…
/r/MensRights25/12/25 09:13 PM
3

I am a man and was a full-time father; the mother earns more, so it made sense. Yes, it was a full-time job. But only for a few years and with several children, while the children were small. Small means under three years old; it was a little easier until they were six, after which it becomes much easier. A normal household without children or with only one child would not justify a full-time parent. The tasks associated with children and the household are not difficult, but it is often mindless…
/r/MensRights21/12/25 10:46 AM
1

Have relationships, love, have fun, have children, but don't get married. You can do all of that without being married. If your partners disagree, then they shouldn't be your partners. In the event of a separation, you will probably have to pay high child support, but you will be spared all the other nonsense that comes with divorce after marriage.
/r/MensRights08/12/25 08:13 PM
3

In most countries, there are very few things that can be regulated in a marriage contract. The things that would be interesting are not possible. Some countries also have civil partnerships, such as France with its PACS. This could be the best option if it exists in the country in question. Finally, a growing number of countries have introduced rules on rights and maintenance that are not linked to marriage but to the existence of a child together. In these countries, you are just as much in a b…
/r/MensRights11/11/25 01:38 PM
2

When I became a father. What I experienced afterwards with custody, maintenance, the youth welfare office and the family court turned me into a completely different person, one who speaks out very clearly about the discrimination against fathers and men, even if the majority don't like it at all.
/r/MensRights02/11/25 10:18 AM
12

The points listed are by no means unique to Australia. They also apply to many other countries.
/r/MensRights27/09/25 08:30 AM
1

Children are also men or women, just not yet sexually mature.
/r/MensRights07/08/25 09:20 AM
1

There will always be enough men who submit and follow the path assigned to them. MGTOW and some other lifestyles therefore do not solve this problem in general and do not improve anything. They solve it individually, for the person who does it themselves.
/r/MensRights25/07/25 08:18 AM
7

The problem can only be solved on a personal level anyway. By staying away from this contempt and hatred. There is no other way anyway, otherwise you will become ill yourself.
/r/MensRights20/02/25 10:17 PM
5

I am a househusband and have raised four children. My wife works full-time. That was the best fit for us. We didn't get married until the children were already there. In the beginning it was a lot of stress, you feel very externally determined and full of obligations, more so than as an employee in a company. That takes time, but it eventually subsides and also falls below most professions. If they don't go back to work in a profession, men and I too tend to fill the increased freedom with new t…
/r/MensRights27/10/24 07:05 PM
1

The path is going in a completely different direction. Not towards unrest, but towards a quiet and silent farewell. Men who no longer feel committed to anyone, who have little interest in partnerships, in the things that a state wants from us.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 08:06 PM
4

No. The sex that has to invest more in reproduction in the animal world is less active in courting. In seahorses, for example, it is the males. In humans, it should now also be the males, because the risks are entirely on their side. They are the ones who have to pay heavily and have no rights, while the ladies are exempt from all risks. Even childbirth is no longer a risk.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 02:34 PM
8

Men are not forced to court women. Not even if they want a relationship. I've even found that as a self-determined, independent man who doesn't court women, I've become much more attractive to women. They are the ones who take the first steps and do something to get into a relationship. That applies a little from the age of 25 and a lot from the age of 30.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 02:29 PM
3

I am also a househusband, several children. There was overt and covert disdain and criticism from relatives, but I don't care about that at all. What men do is always criticized either way. So I can just as well do what I want, the result is the same. If I were the sole breadwinner, I would have to work hard to build up my own enslavement. If I divorced, I would lose most of it and be obliged to continue earning in order to pay a lot of maintenance - forced labor. I can never win. So here again:…
/r/MensRights18/02/24 09:30 AM
1

Men do not have this freedom. Women very rarely accept men announcing that they would rather stay at home than work. Even if they do so with their wife's consent, the risk of divorce still increases enormously. Women can do anything, are allowed to do anything, should do anything. Men can't. When men go their own way, it goes against what is expected of them.
/r/MensRights27/01/24 11:28 AM
1

For children, you absolutely need a woman who can be a mother, whether married, not married, paid substitute. The risks of these paths are well known. I was successful in leaving money out of the equation. After I went bankrupt because of my first wife, I didn't care about having children. I told women who were interested in me bluntly: I'm bankrupt, I can bring up children but I won't be making any money, for better or for worse. And then there was this woman who thought that was okay, so we ha…
/r/MensRights22/01/24 02:09 PM
2

That is not a problem. Have sperm frozen before the vasectomy. This is a procedure that has been used for a long time. It is often done before medical treatments that affect fertility are necessary.
/r/MensRights15/01/24 08:57 AM
0

Marriage can be great. The problem is the way it usually ends. Unfortunately, this is very often a disaster. The risk is simply far too great. In a legislature that makes separations humane, marriage would be a nicer thing. In a legislature that allows crazy raids, it can destroy lives.
/r/MensRights02/01/24 10:20 AM
4

The reason I left was because of my paternity, the child was taken away from me after the separation and I was supposed to pay a lot of money instead. I didn't do that. I didn't pay anything. Instead, I left my job and have a small hobby that generates a little money. Cash. Officially, I'm bankrupt and no bailiff has ever managed to take money from me. It'll stay that way for the rest of my life. And that's a good life, a very good life. No stress, no problems with women, because I flaunt my pov…
/r/MensRights21/12/23 04:12 PM
3

Ignore alphas! They are not worth envy or other feelings. Also: don't follow them, don't listen to them, don't work for them.
/r/MensRights21/12/23 04:04 PM
3

That's what I did, I'm a father who is mainly at home bringing up his children. My mother works 80% of the time and earns the majority of our living. The risks of this arrangement are well known. In my case, there is nothing to gain for the mother if she leaves me, because I have no money. Conversely, she has a lot to lose if she leaves and has to pay maintenance. If she leaves and a judge allows her to take the children with her, she won't be able to work much and her wealth will plummet. There…
/r/MensRights15/12/23 09:26 AM
3

no, I have children. Mainly looked after by me, by the way, the mother earns the money. That was a decision between my partner and me, otherwise it's nobody's business in the world. Who else has children or not, does not interest me. I just don't want to be held responsible or pay for the decisions of others. because they want the power of decision and action, as with all other things. The consequences should then be borne by the men.
/r/MensRights29/09/23 12:37 PM
1

There are many intermediate levels around the world. For example, there are countries in which living together creates a community of need with legal consequences. Other countries also force unmarried men into the same maintenance obligations as soon as they become fathers. So not only child support, but many years of support for the mother. Only the term "common law marriage" is a thing of former English colonies, the content exists more or less often elsewhere.
/r/MensRights19/09/23 09:08 PM
4

It's a very North American thing that's not common throughout the Western world. Here, for example, it is normal that everyone pays his own bill, "separate bill" is the magic word to the waiter and not at all unusual. It is not usual anyway to meet first in a restaurant, but something like this happens is the exception. This does not prevent problems with greedy women, but you do not have to pay when you meet a woman for the first time.
/r/MensRights12/08/23 09:17 PM
4

Discussion rooms with MGTOW topics are censored, closed, banned, but subjectively I have the impression that so many men have become MGTOW like never before. Not through discussions, but through experiences, experience, own insights. You can't keep something like this small by closing discussion spaces. MGTOW is a philosophy. Very many people are MGTOW without even knowing the term. And it is spreading.
/r/MensRights26/06/23 12:06 PM
11

Here, this is the road to hell. In a homemaker's marriage, the wife acquires lifetime alimony rights if she does not work. The husband's income is considered the joint income, beyond the marriage. The circumstances in the marriage are considered to shape the alimony rights. Even homemaker marriages get divorced and the husband is because idiot who pays alimony forever. It is well advised to marry only women who earn as much as he does. What does the housewife actually do at 50? The children are …
/r/MensRights19/01/23 07:50 AM
3

She wants money. Unlike in the U.S., child support in most European countries does not end with the child's 18th birthday, but with the end of the child's first education. From the age of 18, however, from both parents. If the child wants to study, she can claim alimony from both parents until the end of her studies. This can go on for a very long time. The child has to claim and collect the alimony from 18 on by himself. That is why the child reports to you now and not before. It would have bee…
/r/MensRights31/12/22 09:27 AM
1

I did, I still do. Several children, I am at home and take care of them, the mother has a normal job. There are many opinions and doubts about this. Especially some people want to put their two cents in HOW I do it. With mothers, that is never done. Others explain to me that in such constellations the risk of separation is very high. That may be, but it interests me little. I enjoy it, that's what counts. In the event of a separation, I would have lost everything, even as the sole breadwinner. A…
/r/MensRights01/11/22 08:45 AM
2

I did it differently after a bad separation and the loss of the child because the mother refused contact. Only earned very little. More children with a new wife. Told her from the beginning that the only thing I can and will do is take care of the children. She has to do the financial part if she also wants children. She wanted. We got married after the children. If she gets divorced, she will have to pay hefty alimony. This is also the only chance to reform the alimony law. The moment women sud…
/r/MensRights07/08/22 07:43 AM
0

Men have always done the backbreaking work everywhere. They had to. Women stay away from this finely.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 02:29 PM
4

Not possible on reddit.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 10:17 PM
2

Article about it: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-10177343/Online-forum-created-reaction-Red-Pill-Rights-teaches-women-avoid-worthless-scrotes.html
/r/MensRights16/12/21 04:01 PM
19

I don't see anything men can do to stop the development. The only thing they really have left is withdrawal. For example, withdrawal from marriage, withdrawal from education. What are they supposed to be able to do?
/r/MensRights16/12/21 08:32 AM
22

Censored, quarantained, banned from Reddit. Some are over there: https://communities.win/c/MGTOW/
/r/MensRights14/12/21 08:41 PM
3

Feminism has released me from some duties. Women can do everything, they say. They don't need men and therefore they don't need me. So I don't marry, never give women money, never help women, live quite happily with quite few other duties.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 04:55 PM
2

I see it this way: https://imgur.com/a/6d1dmdn
/r/MensRights22/08/21 04:28 PM
1

Quite simple: She met me when I was broke and unemployed. I was skeptical, but had nothing to lose anyway. Today we are married and have three children.
/r/MGTOW202/05/21 06:07 PM
11

But it must be credible. Your look, your car...
/r/MGTOW08/12/20 11:48 AM
1

They connect to either the gold or a Chad. Most Chads need no money to be a Chad.
/r/MGTOW03/06/20 04:03 PM
3

Theres more: https://techcrunch.com/2019/02/11/reddit-300-million/ "The deal makes for an odd pairing between one of the architects of China’s Great Firewall of censorship and one of America’s most lawless free-speech forums. Some Redditors are already protesting the funding by trying to post content that would rile Chinese’s internet watchdogs, like imagery from Tiananmen Square and Winnie the Pooh memes mocking Chinese President Xi Jinping’s appearance."
/r/MGTOW01/03/20 12:58 PM
1

As long as they just lurk, I dont care...
/r/MGTOW11/02/20 07:20 PM
25

I support MGTOW and recommend not to marry, and more important, not becoming a father. But I'm married. Why? After I was tricked into fatherhood and screwed with the usual things (child support and support for the mother which ist high in my country even if you were not married, being alienated from the child and so on) I realized I had really nothing more to lose. So why not try some fun and use some of these mechanisms in my own favor? So I married someone with a good income. She works much mo…
/r/MGTOW23/01/18 12:43 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter