| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | How equality could be hurting men, incels in particularpressure for all institutions to include women I should say pressure for institutions to be mixed. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 03:21 PM |
| 1 | How equality could be hurting men, incels in particularpoint is, they're happy until women join which turns everything on its head. Kinda like recent push to include women in Buddhist monasteries which was historically exclusively male. The whole point of the Buddhist monk life is to get away from worldly distractions like sex. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 03:13 PM |
| 1 | How equality could be hurting men, incels in particularNo men in the military were single? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 03:07 PM |
| 1 | How equality could be hurting men, incels in particularWhy do you think that I think that any relevant number of females care about what unattractive males and "incels" are doing? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 02:59 PM |
| 3 | People not fitting into gender roles should be free to do whatever they want, but why identify as a different gender?This whole "identity" thing is something I personally don't really get. It's not even because of the whole biological sex vs social-construct sex whatever. It is not your job to indentify yourself, other people are supposed to identify you. My identity is different in different people's minds, I don't have one identity. From my perspective, I am me that's it. It would be one thing if you weren't being allowed to do what you wanted to do but for the most part, reasonable people don't give a fuck … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/07/17 03:36 AM |
| 1 | /r/TheRedPill is crypto-neoreactionaryWell given that it's too late now, what do you propose should be done? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/07/17 01:34 AM |
| 1 | What's the point of "people from 'X' are more likely to be/do 'A' than people from from 'Y'" statistics?X is not a percentage, it's a group. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/07/17 01:13 AM |
| 1 | What's the point of "people from 'X' are more likely to be/do 'A' than people from from 'Y'" statistics?yes | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/07/17 12:55 AM |
| 1 | What's the point of "people from 'X' are more likely to be/do 'A' than people from from 'Y'" statistics?I'm pretty sure they're all vetted by the same standards. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 04:29 PM |
| 1 | What's the point of "people from 'X' are more likely to be/do 'A' than people from from 'Y'" statistics?All imigrants are vetted. Even non-muslim ones. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 04:17 PM |
| 1 | What's the point of "people from 'X' are more likely to be/do 'A' than people from from 'Y'" statistics?They are being vetted to get 0 terrorists or as close to 0 as they can. Anything above 0 which is almost always the case, and vetting would be necessary. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 03:38 PM |
| 1 | What's the point of "people from 'X' are more likely to be/do 'A' than people from from 'Y'" statistics?Well OK bad example. Say 1% of everyone else. You never have binary situations like that in real life. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 03:30 PM |
| 1 | What's the point of "people from 'X' are more likely to be/do 'A' than people from from 'Y'" statistics?I was asking for what other reason other than the applications like the marketing example (broad brush stroke examples) and prejudice would you want those kind of statistics. The reason for the question is because people cite those statistics as a reason to discriminate against innocent people even though they tell you nothing about the individual you are discriminating against. However, u/TheBlackQuill mentioned the marketing example and I had to make the qualification. Unless you WANT TO make … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 03:28 PM |
| 1 | What's the point of "people from 'X' are more likely to be/do 'A' than people from from 'Y'" statistics?It has not significance on its own. That's what I'm saying, but I go further. Even if 5% of all muslims were terrorists and 0% of everyone else were. It's still irrelevant. There are vetting procedures you can use to determine if an individual muslim is a risk, and steps you can take to mitigate radicalisation. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 03:20 PM |
| 1 | What's the point of "people from 'X' are more likely to be/do 'A' than people from from 'Y'" statistics?Well then that's painting with broad brush strokes because it's not about the individual so much as it is about getting a statistical edge by picking a number of people more likely to get you the result you want, like the marketing example. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 03:14 PM |
| 1 | What's the point of "people from 'X' are more likely to be/do 'A' than people from from 'Y'" statistics?are you comparing 90% of women are raped to "these people are more likely to do this thing to these other people"? The second one isn't even saying anything. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 02:57 PM |
| 1 | What's the point of "people from 'X' are more likely to be/do 'A' than people from from 'Y'" statistics?Useless in the sense that they tell you nothing about the individual. I'm talking about those kinds of statistics in general in all contexts. If you said isotope X of an element has a shorter half life than isotope Y of that element and you knew that a particle belonging to one of those isotopes had decayed, you couldn't definitevely say which isotope that particle belonged to and even if you could, you couldn't pinpoint the particle that decayed. When this is applied to people it's even more im… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 02:55 PM |
| 1 | What's the point of "people from 'X' are more likely to be/do 'A' than people from from 'Y'" statistics?I have, I just didn't find what you talking about. Which is why I wish you would point them out to me. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 02:46 PM |
| 1 | What's the point of "people from 'X' are more likely to be/do 'A' than people from from 'Y'" statistics?Couldn't find them. I don't know what you're talking about. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 02:45 PM |
| 1 | What's the point of "people from 'X' are more likely to be/do 'A' than people from from 'Y'" statistics?Which were? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 02:44 PM |
| 1 | What's the point of "people from 'X' are more likely to be/do 'A' than people from from 'Y'" statistics?Between what two stats? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 02:42 PM |
| 1 | What's the point of "people from 'X' are more likely to be/do 'A' than people from from 'Y'" statistics?The idea of a Jury is to pick people from all walks of life in an effort to make an unbiased judgement. That's not to say that's what actually happens. Old white dude with cowboy boots on who pays his taxes and is willing to consider evidence should be eligible for jury duty. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 02:41 PM |
| 1 | What's the point of "people from 'X' are more likely to be/do 'A' than people from from 'Y'" statistics?Why are you so animated? chill. I'm not saying take your children to schools where 90% of women are raped lol. That's actually the kind of statistic that matters imo. Not the kind that says, these people or more likely to do this thing that these other people. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 02:32 PM |
| 1 | What's the point of "people from 'X' are more likely to be/do 'A' than people from from 'Y'" statistics?Other than in situations in which we do want to paint with broad brush strokes like the one described by u/TheBlackQuill, tip of the hat to you. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 02:17 PM |
| 1 | What's the point of "people from 'X' are more likely to be/do 'A' than people from from 'Y'" statistics?Still not. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 02:16 PM |
| 1 | What's the point of "people from 'X' are more likely to be/do 'A' than people from from 'Y'" statistics?Mainstream science isn't even that deterministic. It is the determinists that use 'alternative' studies in my experience in the debate alt-right sub. Even when they use mainstream studies, they tend to ignore the explantions that sometimes even the researchers themselves provide saying that they were under (((pressure))) that's why they gave those explanations. It's common sense the role the environment plays, the evolutionary advatages that the brain provide lie in the fact that they are so pla… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 02:14 PM |
| 1 | What's the point of "people from 'X' are more likely to be/do 'A' than people from from 'Y'" statistics?That's not a "people from 'X' are more likely to be/do 'A' than people from from 'Y'" statistic. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 02:07 PM |
| 1 | What's the point of "people from 'X' are more likely to be/do 'A' than people from from 'Y'" statistics?Refer to my edit. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 02:06 PM |
| 1 | What's the point of "people from 'X' are more likely to be/do 'A' than people from from 'Y'" statistics?That's not really like the kind of statistic I'm talking about which is comparative. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 01:39 PM |
| 1 | What's the point of "people from 'X' are more likely to be/do 'A' than people from from 'Y'" statistics?Noted | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 01:36 PM |
| 1 | What's the point of "people from 'X' are more likely to be/do 'A' than people from from 'Y'" statistics?to give ppl that like to measure stuff something to do all day. Final answer? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 01:31 PM |
| 1 | What's the point of "people from 'X' are more likely to be/do 'A' than people from from 'Y'" statistics?I said other than give people illegitimate excuse to be prejudiced | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 01:28 PM |
| 1 | What's the point of "people from 'X' are more likely to be/do 'A' than people from from 'Y'" statistics?Now if you're talking about law enforcement officials or intelligence analysts that rely on Bayesian reasoning, do you think that they should ignore certain characteristics that will lead to a more efficient identification of suspects out of political correctness? I disagree. That comprises of situations in which you might be willing to paint with broad brush strokes. Like determining which area to bomb. However it also contains situations which could lead to guilty without proof of guilt, which… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 01:26 PM |
| 2 | What's the point of "people from 'X' are more likely to be/do 'A' than people from from 'Y'" statistics?You can't use the kind of statistic in question to predict one's behaviour. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 01:21 PM |
| 1 | What's the point of "people from 'X' are more likely to be/do 'A' than people from from 'Y'" statistics?Replace it with, "for all intents and purposes" if it triggers you less. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 12:54 PM |
| 2 | CMV: Feminism's full-throated defense of Islam completely and utterly debunks feminist ideals and goalsWell white men are more likely to commit genosides statistically speaking but that statistic tells you nothing about the average bone. If a muslim hasn't done anything wrong, you leave them alone. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 12:06 PM |
| 3 | CMV: Feminism's full-throated defense of Islam completely and utterly debunks feminist ideals and goalsI'm pretty sure they're defending Muslims, not Islam. It really doesn't matter whether or not Islam is a "religion of peace". What matters is what the individual Muslim practices. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 10:33 AM |
| 2 | Q4men: pick just 2 of the following in an SO: sane, hot, or smartSanity is subjective and given how I myself am quite insane by normal standards, I would probably be more appreciated by someone who was also "insane" like me and it wouldn't be mind numbingly boring.. So I guess smart and hot. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/07/17 07:35 AM |
| 2 | On Hatred for TRPNope as in regulated. It is controlled when and how many children can be had. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/07/17 02:44 AM |
| 2 | On Hatred for TRPwhat if child production was also communised? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/07/17 02:25 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter