| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | Girl, 16, who cried rape after cheating on boyfriend is jailed for 6 monthsAbout 6 or 7 times in this thread alone, yes. Interesting, deterrence is much studied in criminology and it seems to work. Much of our legal system is based on the principle of deterrence, so do you disagree in general or do you believe this was a special case? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deterrence_(legal)#Effectiveness Go on. What? 16 years is the age of consent. Many countries consider 16 years to be an adult legally. This person lied about being raped and ruined the reputation of innocent … | /r/MensRights | 12/10/15 04:22 AM |
| 6 | Girl, 16, who cried rape after cheating on boyfriend is jailed for 6 monthsAre you really saying that deterrence is not a legitimate reason for punishment? If so our legal system would like a word with you. Additionally, if you're old enough to fabricate a rape story and attempt to ruin the lives of multiple innocent people, you're old enough to be treated like an adult. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/15 02:34 AM |
| 3 | Feminist Extremists Talk About Poisoning Men and Getting MilitantWell this is awkward. From the website: Oh, secretly I was going to abort my second pregnancy if it were a male. Because I was over 40 I was eligible for a chorionic villus sampling early in pregnancy and did so. She was a girl, and had that baby. I understand many sex selections are for males, but not all. I am behind aborting male fetus for as long as it takes. Sorry, but only can speak on that because it was my plan. I know abortion for sex selection is one of the targets for clamp down, and … | /r/MensRights | 01/07/13 02:25 AM |
| 1 | Leeds woman admitted she made up false rape accusation, because she wanted to get out of a relationship and hoped to get rehoused – an innocent man was jailed and £57,900 were spent for a vast policethats how police investigations work and it has nothing to do with mens rights. Oh well in that case I suppose everything is fine. Because this is simply "how it works"! | /r/MensRights | 21/05/13 05:45 AM |
| 1 | College student leader: Requiring substantial evidence of a sex offense before a student may be expelled 'automatically assum[es] the information from the victim is false'It is obviously better to simply assume the information from the victim is always true, no investigation required. Because Patriarchy, amiright? | /r/MensRights | 21/05/13 04:43 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter