TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

yas_kang_slayyy Archive

View 1 post and 38 comments by yas_kang_slayyy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

How many virgins do you think there are? And why would they choose you? They'd probably choose some religious traditionalist guy. Guys that obsess over this shit are delusional. Stop trying to find unicorns. Accept women for what they are and move on with your life.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 02:19 AM
1

Just because they are fewer women doesn't mean that employers don't favor them, that's ridiculous. Men and women choose different career paths. Women are far less likely to pursue training or a degree in IT related fields.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 09:27 PM
1

And? What's your point? Being invited to move forward means the employer is interested in hiring you after seeing your resume. All else being equal, employers are more interested in hiring women. This is clear evidence of discrimination.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 09:27 PM
1

So why would you be upset that a woman is getting an opportunity I never said that I was upset merely by women getting opportunities. Don't put words in my mouth. I'm upset when women unfairly get opportunities because employers discriminate in their favor.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 09:07 PM
1

But they obviously favor men According to what? This research paper clearly indicates that they favor women. A resume with a female name is 41% more likely to receive a callback than an otherwise identical resume with a male name.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 09:04 PM
1

Men aren’t discriminated against in the software engineer field. It’s women actually. The statistics are right here, in the research paper I posted. "Specifically, applications randomly assigned a female name exhibit a 41% higher probability of being invited to move forward in the interview process than those with male names"
/r/MensRights07/09/22 08:59 PM
1

How the hell did you get that? No, I'm saying that companies shouldn't give preference to one sex or another when hiring. For every opportunity that a woman gains through this, a man loses an opportunity. For every opportunity that a woman gains through this kind of sex discrimination, a man loses an opportunity. Why would I support something that discriminates against men, and harms men, just because it "gives women opportunities"? Does the world revolve around women? Do men's interests not mat…
/r/MensRights07/09/22 08:55 PM
1

they are giving women opportunities That's a nice euphemism for sex-based discrimination against men. For every opportunity that a woman gains through this, a man loses an opportunity.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 08:38 PM
1

And, we understand the rise of the RP among young men TRP was never mainstream. The subreddit wasn't very large even before the quarantine and there's barely any media coverage on it. seeing how Andrew Tate has taken off I wouldn't call him RP, there are some similarities but he's more traditionalist he doesn't really use RP terms and discuss core RP concepts and tactics. Even if you insisted that Andrew Tate was equivalent to TRP, he literally just went viral so it's too early to know how well …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 07:41 PM
1

No shit Sherlock. Next question.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 07:33 PM
3

Anger is an emotion and does not entail any specific action. And there’s not much I can do to change the policies of employers and universities. Many groups and individuals throughout history were angry but powerless to do anything in the face of injustice.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 05:14 PM
8

No one is afraid. We’re angry.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 04:59 PM
7

but we know they weren’t getting the interviews and scholarships anyways. if they could have done it they would have done it You’re absolutely retarded. Sex discrimination, by definition, means that guys who otherwise would have gotten those opportunities didn’t. Solely because of their sex. You think the real men mind You think any man who opposes discrimination isn’t a “real man”?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 04:53 PM
8

Men have been experiencing the effects of this shit IRL, seeing scholarships only for women, and affirmative action for women in employment and education. It has a very real negative impact on our lives. You’re so out of touch. I can’t decide if you’re a troll or a genuinely clueless boomer.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 04:36 PM
8

where are you “finding” these “feminist” except online? Yep, online. This is the digital age boomer. Most social and political discourse happens on the internet. Get with the fucking times. People living in the real world doing real life things The internet is the real world.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 04:30 PM
14

I don’t follow manosphere influencers. And I don’t need to take a college course on feminism to see the hostility that mainstream feminist individuals, groups, and movements and express towards men. Whether it’s through hateful rhetoric such as “teach boys not to rape”, concerted efforts to defend such rhetoric such as their vocal defense of “#killallmen”, or their championing of policies that discriminate against men such as sex-based affirmative action. It literally just takes a few minutes of…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 03:44 PM
20

Where do you get your opinions about women You say “women” in your title but parts of the body talk about “feminism” or “feminists”. These are not interchangeable. Women are a sex and feminism is an ideology. Some women strongly identify with feminism, some do not. To address the “woman” part, my views on women’s sexual behavior is largely based on scientific research and theories, as well as some less formal quantitative data such as Pew Polls and the infamous OkCupid data. I feel like the inte…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 03:39 PM
1

That simp caught feels for a literal whore and married her.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 03:05 PM
3

Sure but I’m talking to the guys. And women on PPD rarely talk about men’s n-counts.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 01:37 PM
2

Does it really? I think there are many topics that piss them off a lot more than n-count.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 01:03 PM
2

most intelligent woman on PPD
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 01:00 PM
1

i meant your favorite byzantine emperor bozo
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 12:59 PM
11

It’s so incredibly abusive Women love that shit LMAO. Surveys have found that most of them admit to enjoying being “dominated” and having rape fantasies regularly. On Pornhub women are more likely to consume violent porn than men. It turned out it was because she didn’t want to do anal sex anymore If her ex dumped her for not doing anal he’s the furthest thing from an incel. He’s not the reason behind rising male celibacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 12:11 PM
3

Stop fucking posting about n-count. There’s no way to know, women can easily lie about their n-counts. You’re not Bran Stark. All this bitching over n-count is completely pointless. Even if she’s a slut and ends up cheating on you, you’ll be fine as long as you don’t get married. Is it that hard not to sign a life-ruining contract?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 12:01 PM
1

favorite emperor?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 11:42 AM
2

Because women are chauvinistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 09:14 AM
2

This more to life than just money. His reputation has been completely dragged through the mud, his relationships have probably been ruined, and he spent years of his life worrying about being wrongfully incarcerated.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 09:04 AM
7

that he is not a good poster child for false rape allegations There is no such thing as a perfect victim. I guarantee that you wouldn't be so dismissive towards a female rape or domestic violence victim because she was an ill-mannered alcoholic. Feminists did the exact same thing to Johnny Depp, when they brought up his substance use problems to use as a weapon against him during the defamation trial. As if struggling with addiction makes you a bad person. As if that's relevant to the fact that …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 09:02 AM
18

Women are much more selective than men, but 80/20 is an exaggeration IMO. More than a small minority of men can get sex and relationships consistently. But even if just a quarter of young men faced consistent, chronic, rejections, that’s still a lot of incels. There are non-sexual aspects to a BF/GF relationship. These aspects(and monogamy) are what distinguishes a BF/GF relationship from a FWB relationship. Women may choose a man they don’t find very attractive to be her boyfriend because of wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 05:53 AM
1

Women don’t project their behavior onto men challenge(INSTANT FAIL!!!!)
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 05:04 AM
1

Sleeping around can mean sleeping with one person at a time I don’t agree, but regardless, that’s not the norm for young people. Non-exclusive sexual relationships are incredibly common. The average woman has 4-5 sex partners in her life The average woman claimed to have around 4-5 sex partners. In surveys done before hookup apps like Tinder became popular. The standards aren’t related to appearance because that is subjective How is the subjectivity of physical attractiveness relevant? Many of u…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 10:29 AM
3

Many if not most severely balding men aren’t brave enough to shave it all off.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 10:22 AM
2

that’s still not polygamous I never said anything about polygamy(being married to multiple people). You claimed that society is monogamous. Because we(including you) are talking about sexual relationships in general and not just marriage, the definition of monogamy being used here is the broad one: “the state or practice of having only one sexual partner at a time” Sleeping around and having non-exclusive sexual relationships may not be polygamous, but it is by definition non-monogamous. we just…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 10:17 AM
1

So what?
/r/MensRights06/09/22 07:40 AM
7

I've read research saying that bald men are perceived as MORE attractive and masculine on average. At the very least it doesn't hurt them significantly.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 06:59 AM
5

Monogamous in terms of long term partners. You're only looking at a small piece of the pie, we're talking about sexual relationships as a whole. Everything from a ONS to marriage. Generally, women are pickier than men. The less committed it is, the greater the disparity. Open relationships are not the norm despite how widespread their stories are. People usually aren't in a "relationship" when they're sleeping around.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 04:11 AM
6

Except they can. Our society is still set up as monogamous How old are you? This literally isn't true anymore for young people.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 04:01 AM
79

Men don't age like wine. True. Physically, men age as bad (if not worse) than women It's indisputable that women age worse than men in the sense that their physical attractiveness and desirability(in the eyes of the opposite sex) declines more with age. Scientific evidence is overwhelmingly in favor of this conclusion. To deny this is just coping. https://sci-hub.se/https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23878 Women's facial structure ages faster than men's https://cnalifestyle.channelnewsasia.com/style/a…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 03:58 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter