TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

yayeey15 Archive

View 0 posts and 343 comments by yayeey15 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

It's amazing how many people in this thread just don't get it. You're spot on with pretty much every single comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/20 03:34 PM
1

This is a good post OP, you literally just proved why height>face. Thank you. A 6'6 normie would cuck a 6'1 alpha chad to the moon and back. Height >>> Face. Additionally if you're a woman, body>face holds true most of the time. It's rarer to find guys that care more about facial beauty than vice versa. Makeup is also another reason why facial beauty is overrated in women and why body>face.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/20 01:05 PM
0

Does meeting more men make it easier for women to meet a good man? Of course it does. Especially for metting your looksmatch or approximate looksmatch. However I do acknowledge that people that approach generally approach people slightly above their looksmatch (not way above, this is way less common). Another thing you need to understand is time commitment. It is way more effort for men to meet women than vice versa. I could go and approach my looksmatch either in person or message on social med…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/19 06:48 AM
1

Projection much? I used the example of a women who is looking for a ltr rather than casual sex Ok so that adresses literally my last point only. What about the inevitable resulting pump and dump that perpetuated by the woman because a woman finds out that the man that she found attractive wasn't really sexually compatible for the relationship? You completely failed to adress this point. Ugly guys hitting on you doesn't help you find a hot boyfriend That "ugly" guy might unironcally be your looks…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/19 06:34 AM
2

If women went for their looksmatch the problem you're describing would barely even exist. Instead they chase chad (guys that are way above them, who would FOR OBVIOUS REASONS never commit (or only with a very low probability) ). Also you need to understand that the pump and dump is done from both sides? You don't buy a car without test driving it first. You don't start a relationship without test driving first. Why do you assume it is only the men that want sex but not a relationship? For instan…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/19 06:12 AM
1

Straight men are very bad at assessing how attractive men are, I've noticed. That may be true but I think straight women are pretty bad at it too considering the fact that they rate a large proportion of men to be below average.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/18 07:31 PM
2

I might be wrong but most (vastly more than 50%) of marriages end in divorce? Also, how common is marriage past the year 2010 or so? It doesn't seem particularly popular anymore, but I understand the fact that it used to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/18 01:57 PM
1

Actually that famous OKCupid study showed that women in their forties start preferring younger men yeah I think it started in mid/late thirties. but the range is mainly 2-4 in either direction. (for women across all ages). women in their twenties like guys a year or 2 older than them. Not from what I can remember, do you have the study by any chance? Late twenties/early thirties maybe I can agree with you but early twenties I can remember maybe +(2-4) range. It doesn't matter by the way what men…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/18 10:42 AM
2

dakru is right here. I followed a girl when she had maybe 4-5k followers on insta now she has 100k+. That doesn't make her any hotter in my book. "The competition" doesn't make her attractiveness go up, only her beauty does.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/18 06:26 PM
4

“Men vary more than women in IQ" Hedges, L. V., & Nowell, A. (1995). Sex differences in mental scores, variability, and numbers of high scoring individuals. Science, 269, 41–45. Lehrke, R. (1997). Sex linkage of intelligence: The X-Factor. NY: Praeger. Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. M. (2006). Study of mathematically precocious youth after 35 years. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 316–345. Kind of surprising you are disputing this fact. The science is quite steady on it. You might find som…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/18 12:35 PM
2

What do you want a proof for? That men and women differ biologically, and that men are more likely to undergo "different types" of mutations because of it? Men typically have a XY chromosome and women typically have a XX. Is this what you want a proof for? Not every male has a XY and not every female has a XX.- I am giving you a logical argument here for why things are what they are. What are you not following?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/18 12:11 PM
2

The proof is that men vary more than women (when it comes to everything pretty much). Physically (for instance height), but also mentally (anything from preferences to IQ). One explanation is that men have only 1 X chromosome and since the Y chromosome contains so few genes, this means that there are many genes that men have 1 copy of and women have 2 copies of. So a mutation in 1 of these genes is more likely to affect a man (either in a good or bad way), since he has no "backup" copy. If women…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/18 12:01 PM
1

Not gonna respond to what you said here, really cba going back and forth writing huge paragraphs to eachother, I just want to make a quick clarification. Sex drive in my opinion is how often you want sex or how often you want sexual release. How many people you want sex with in my opinion is completely irrelevant. All I am pointing out is that it is possible to get tired of having sex with the same person (this applies to both genders) so while I can say no to sex if you asked me I would say yes…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/18 09:38 AM
1

I'd say I lust after him about half of the time we're together. Well thats one of the big differences between men and women. You lust about him "half the time", while he lust about literally any physically attractive female (CONSTANTLY). With age controlled for Men have a far higher sex drive than women. (for instance 20 year old woman vs 20 year old man). This is just facts. I am not denying that some women have really high sex drives (and want sex all the time almost or more than men), I am sa…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/18 08:40 AM
1

ok, you just completely destroyed this guy
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/18 08:31 AM
1

depends on the disease
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/18 02:41 AM
1

Most women want a guy taller than them pretty much every woman. Also, that would be the BARE MINIMUM. i.e far from ideal. If you think an attractive 5'5 woman would date a 5'7 guy (even if he is attractive, both physically and mentally) then you are beyond delusional. 5'6 would qualify as the bare MINIMUM aka the ugliest /worst option for a girl that is 5'5, who has the requirement: "Taller than me". for some girls, or a lot of girls they put the mark even higher than just "taller than me", whic…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/18 02:13 AM
1

Disease, disfunction, etc is objectively not attractive Wait what? That's not even close to an objective truth...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/18 02:08 AM
1

You should check out r short. You are wrong with a lot of your comments. Being short is unfortunately a death sentence when it comes to dating. Specially when it comes to attracting taller women (women that are taller than you). The harsh truth is that women don't care about looks they care about height (and that almost exclusively). All you need to be a chad is height. This applies more or less universally.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/18 09:36 PM
1

height is a problem even if you are 6'2. How are you going to attract all those hot female college volleyball/basketball players?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/18 09:33 PM
1

sure, but I do think it is one of the main motivations for short guys being attracted to taller girls /girls taller than them (not just me). Scarcity certainly might be another one, but I suppose that is more general (i.e it doesn't just apply for short guys.)
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/18 09:30 PM
1

meh marriages and relationships break all the time. How often do you see a couple where the female is taller than the male? About 1/720 couples I believe? I believe this statistic just skyrockets as the height difference gets larger. I.e if I say I am almost exclusively attracted to women that are 3-4inches (or more) taller than me, then you are quickly talking about 1/10000. At no point in my life would this be obtainable. When you are talking about married women being unobtainable I don't thin…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/18 09:08 PM
1

higher male variance (in intelligence) isn't a myth tho. If you take a sample of young children like 6, 7 years old then sure, outside of that (from the age ~10 and up) I highly doubt it. When talking about male female variability in intelligence it's important to have large representative samples from national populations. In this regard the gold standard is novell and hedges. Novell & Hedges (1995): Six large stratified national probability samples (n>250 000) show M>F variance in 35/37 tests.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/18 03:38 PM
1

Completely disagree. Young children is the only sample that will yield anything close to "no difference in variance". Past the age of 10 or so there is a significant difference. Men vary more in their teens and adulthood in almost every single metric of intelligence, the exceptions being reading comprehension, perceptual speed, and associative memory. A well known fact is also that males typically outnumber females substantially among high-scoring individuals. With proper testing it is almost im…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/18 03:01 PM
1

Far from an established fact. Except that it is. Here is the harsh truth with the identity gender politics filter out. Men are on average smarter and they also vary more than women when it comes to intelligence. Measurable sex differences in general intelligence can largely explain the male dominance in the upper echelons of all known human societies, both in history and in the present day. and women are not under-represented but over-represented in many domains. The facts Adult human males have…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/18 01:36 PM
1

I think I have come to terms with the fact that I like tall women precisely for this reason. i.e they are what I can't have (as a short dude). I have thought a lot about this and at first I didn't fully understand where my attraction to them came from (This was like 8+ years ago). It is something that has strongly developed I would say, specially as I realized I wasn't going to grow taller. Tall women are infinitely more attractive to me than average/short (atleast in person). The taller the bet…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/18 09:13 PM
1

got 95%+ percentile on both. are you also 95 percentile memory or 95 percentile when it comes to speed of spelling words backwards? Someone who does well on the MCAT/ACT will destroy the wonderlic I wouldn't really say so. Someone I know off got a 2340 sat, and a 41 wonderlic (far and beyond the 99 percentile in both). There are nfl players (occasionally) that get better than 41 on the wonderlic.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/18 02:38 PM
1

the wonderlic is more like an IQ test than the act or mcat. the act/mcat builds on more background knowledge. Your average high schooler could do well on the wonderlic. Certainly. The wonderlic gives you a bunch of basic problems that you have to answer quickly, and this is exactly what IQ is, is it not? If I say the word: "Players" to you, how quickly can you restock the letters (in your head) and spell it out backwards to me verbally? aka sreyalp? If I put a basic physical puzzle in front of y…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/18 12:46 PM
2

But I think you would have a hard time saying money and status don't help. For sure it helps, it helps a shit ton. I just brought up an example where insane intelligence doesn't translate to "insane amounts of women". In my opinion being a professor (or even a phd/phd student) is also extremely high status (which is why in my view, this is such a good example), but I don't think the rest of society sees it in the same way. I think most people would say being a doctor or being very rich, or being…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/18 10:23 PM
2

Being a math/stem professor is pretty much the epitome of intelligence and it is also high status (atleast in the sense of how difficult it is to become one). I don't really see how these people having their pick with women. (math professors, or math phd's, etc). Sure, but you have to really fuck up to not turn your intelligence into status and resources. going for a phd in math (and beyond) is insane amount of effort and motivation. People think undergrad degree in engineering is a lot of work,…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/18 10:13 PM
3

it also depends on what you mean with intelligence. intelligent in the sense of being very socially capable, sure. But unfortunately I don't think anyone cares about stem nerds. Sure they might be intelligent, but maybe not as practiced socially.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/18 10:05 PM
1

this is why you go for looks instead of personality. male and female interests are so different that it is almost impossible to find a significant other with several common interests.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/18 10:01 PM
1

To be fair most famous athletes seem pretty stupid if you watch them get interviewed. I believe the players in NFL are IQ tested. I am not entirely sure about the average IQ's there compared to the overall population but I know that occasionally there are players with really high IQ's, or at the very least significantly above average. So then you have someone that is big, tall and athletic but also above average intelligence, it is not something that is uncommon (for that sample).
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/18 09:54 PM
2

ugly is a "stronger word" than what you are making out to be in my opinion. Look up the definition. Ugly means legitimately repulsive/disgusting to look at. In no world is below average that.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/18 11:45 AM
2

thanks to tinder and online dating, being a chad is now better than what it has ever been. Your local Chad still doesn't have easy accept to high quality women. Maybe not (extremely high quality women, top 1% and beyond). But I highly doubt that anyone can compete against chad when it comes to getting moderate to high quality women (locally), aside from maybe famous people (assuming you are famous enough). Chad just has to get on tinder and start swiping. Famous people can just check their twitt…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/18 07:51 PM
1

I think you mean that I might have a better chance if I go and kill a bunch of people. The bio could maybe work too if it comes across as believable. Also assuming that women even bother reading the bio of someone that is that ugly.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/18 03:08 AM
2

I do. Again, that's why women are willing to overlook some of the most horrible crimes a man can commit if he's good looking. Otherwise, this wouldn't happen. The funny thing is that if you're ugly you might actually get more matches from having a bio similar to the one in that picutre you linked in another comment. (going from 0 matches to some). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hybristophilia One of the most infamous examples of hybristophilia is the large number of women attracted to Ted Bundy a…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/18 02:57 AM
0

really? even including social media? I reckon girls on there get DM'd a lot by guys they have never even met before.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/18 08:05 PM
1

you will have to just google/youtube it and search around for yourself to get a unbiased perspective. Much better that way then me finding some pictures here and there that might not be completely fair. For instance I don't think it is super difficult to find pictures of attractive people that make them look not so attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/18 10:46 PM
1

I'm pretty sure I've never seen someone who was decent in their 20s get better in their thirties. david gandy, jason momoa. Whether or not they got better I suppose is subjective. Both past their peak now, but personally I would say they both peaked physically in their early thirties, or at the very least late late 20's. For instance: I think jason momoa looked better in lets say 2011 or 2012 maybe even 2013 then what he did in lets say 2008? Althought I can understand why some will maybe say he…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/18 10:31 PM
1

why would I be triggered? You got completely destroyed dude.. Imagining yourself to be 8' (when it just isn't) is something that is very close to your "identity", as evidenced by several of your comments in this thread before I even commented to you. That is certainly a reason to get triggered over (when someone doesn't believe something that is "so close to you", also evidenced by the fact that you asked me if I wanted a pic, and then again if I had something to offer. You have also been caught…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/18 11:58 AM
1

Dude. I took you up on your offer (pic) and you "back tracked" super hard. I know it is easy to lie online. Just stop lying about being 8' and we are good. If I went around and said that my IQ is 150, then I am ready to provide evidence for that claim, ALWAYS. If I went around and said that I am 6'8, same thing. If someone where to challenge me on that first statement I'd take any IQ test of their choice on the spot and LINK proof of my IQ after I'm done, even if it is a 45min IQ test, I'd do th…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/18 02:11 AM
1

Ill send you $10 worth of ETH/BTC if you prove to me that you're 8' (or larger). Post proof and link me ur adress and ill send you it, as long as the proof is legitimate. (i.e that it is you and that it shows CLEARLY that you are 8' or larger.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/18 01:26 AM
1

You are projecting super hard how s0? you're not 8' buddy, and that's it. thats what I said.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/18 01:16 AM
0

What exactly should I be jealous of? your imaginary penis size? You're small (which has pretty much been confirmed at this point) and you day dream about being 8', that's it. nothing more nothing less.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/18 12:34 AM
1

jesus christ you're dense, this is legitimately impressive.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/18 10:17 PM
1

why did it turn into this? you asked if I wanted a pic and I said yes? What's wrong buddy? Just accept it man.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/18 05:44 PM
1

Ok I think at this point it's pretty clear that you're not even close to 8'.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/18 12:16 PM
1

sure. a pic that clearly shows the measurement as well as proves that it is you
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/18 11:16 PM
1

you're not even close to 8'
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/18 08:49 PM
1

From evolution women selected mainly based on power/status, not looks. It was the "celebrities" of that time (thousands of years ago) that mass reproduced not the good looking "young brad pitt's" belonging to the lowest caste. Also as far as what you said about health I completely agree with you. Good looking people were selected for because they look more healthy, that is a straight forward evolutionary tactic. I would however say that reading a bit of the comments down here. There clearly is a…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/18 08:36 PM
1

No, there used to be a cultural push to marry off younger women to older men. Absolutely. Cultures like that even exist today, where teenage girls (15, 16 years old) are being married to 50-60 year old men or whatever. This is because they are literally being bought. There is also that time where women were being discriminated against heavily so It was probably optimal which is why the narrative was like that back then. What you're seeing now is women's natural attraction. i.e they are crazy att…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/18 03:22 AM
1

The only thing that pushes that is your biology... I am not saying women biologically like very old men, but biologically they do like men like that. That's why women go crazy for even "ugly" famous guys, they go more crazy for those guys than male models or male instagram models, etc. They care WAY more about power/fame/money than about looks. Women doesn't think men their age look the best, that would be ridiculous considering that it increases as they go up in age themselves. They like men th…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/18 12:04 AM
1

Women marry older men when they are poor or in a society that restricts them. generally true. As women get more independent, fewer marry old guys. Also true, but thats not just because they are getting more independent, there is also a narrative that is being pushed, as well as other "social conditioning". This is precisely what the research tells us. There is nothing that much biological going on here.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/18 10:36 AM
1

That's like saying that men are socially conditioned to like young women. Except that it is biological. Men are biologically attracted to young women. Sure culture works as a modulator but the blueprint for attraction comes from biology. Women are not biologically attracted to young men for instance. Women know what is sexually attractive to them. But you don't know what is imposed on you through social conditioning and what is biological without looking at the research.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/18 02:30 AM
1

On online dating if you list 5'11 or below, you won't even show up for half the girls because they all set the filter to 6'0+.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 08:20 PM
1

I am not going to bring biology into this argument, because I am not sure if I can win it, but what you just wrote here is not how things work mainly because of social reasons (in my opinion) not from a pure "attractiveness" standpoint. Even a 5'2 woman, will definitely not get any approval from her parents/friends if she were to date a guy that is 5'6, and that is something that will make things WAY harder for the 5'6 male. Also as you said, the bare minimum height requirement (for almost every…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 07:49 PM
1

It will still be extremely hard because of social conditioning. Women are extremely social and therefore seek more approval from their friends and parents than what men do. If a girl is 5'5 and and you are taller than her, but she happen to have a close (female) friend that is taller than you, then that is going to make things harder for you to get a chance with this 5'5 girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 07:44 PM
2

Deleted my other comment because I thought you responded to my other one. Couldn't really tell from just reading your comment in my inbox. Women say this all the time but their actions don't comport with their statements. Not in this case. Women don't care much about the physique of a man. This is quite obvious from the wide of range taste they have. A significant amount of women like the dad bod (overweight but goes to the gym a couple times a week), just like there is a significant amount that…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 07:38 PM
1

5'4+ is no issue. If you are a short man (even 5'4+) you will NEVER get a girlfriend because of "good looks", simply becuase if you are short you are not good looking (From womens perspective).
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 07:31 PM
1

absolutely. Height makes up almost everything that women find physically attractive (looks) in men. If you're a short man there is no hope for you in the looks departement.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 05:15 PM
1

women doesn't care as much about guys being overweight
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 05:05 PM
1

When women choose who they like, they don't choose older guys. This depends. Do you mean young women specifically? A young woman who ends up with an older guy has been forced to settle. And a young woman that ends up with a young man has been socially conditioned to think old guys are "disgusting". This narrative has been pushed by women themselves for several decades in recent history. (Old women want some of the men too). There is also that argument that women also prefer men to be on the same…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 04:51 PM
1

Biology is the main reason. If we speak strictly about biology no person should ever desire to procreate with a person over 25. All of evolutionary biology/psychology disagree with this statement. When it comes to procreate with women over 25, then sure you might be right. I will link something down below so you can read the evolutionary/biological argument for why women and men are attracted to what they are attracted to, and why youthfulness is attractive in women, but it is not so important i…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/18 08:03 PM
1

Well the biological argument as you said comes down to female fertility being extremely limited, while male fertility is not. It gets really difficult for women to reproduce as they get older. This is not true for men. Old fathers 45+ can maybe lets say triple the chance for a certain health problem (compared to a 22 year old father), but the chance for it is still extremely low. On the other side of the biological argument it is the protection and resources and all that.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/18 07:23 PM
1

Men's attraction to young women is largely biological but the contrast is not true. It's "easier" for women to be attracted to older men, than it is for men to be attracted to older women. This is biological. The fundamental blue print of attraction comes from evolution. Through biology how do you explain that on average a 22 year old (western) woman would maybe ideally want a 24 year old man, but a 33 year old woman would want a 35 year old man? You probably can't. The female preference here is…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/18 06:58 PM
1

Or if you look at the graph that was posted on here many many months ago. (I am not sure how they found the result). Might have been polling, (maybe they surveyed people and asked what age they would ideally want their partner to be). But anyway what they found was that regardless of men's age they never prefered women above the age of 22 (statistically speaking, obviously there are outliers). The preference (for any age male, was in the 18-22 age range woman). In short, a 45 year old man if he …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/18 08:25 PM
1

But old women don't like young men. it's perfectly true. Old men like young women. There you go.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/17 11:55 PM
1

Youthfuless is a key component in women's SMV, but not so much in Men's, this is biological. That's why guys peak way later.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/17 11:52 PM
1

5 year difference is rather common imo, anything up to 10 is.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/17 04:42 AM
1

A man her age rather than a much older guy depends on what you mean with much older guy
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/17 12:29 AM
1

Women as a group don't prefer older men. Try okcupid/tinder as an 18/19 year old male, lets see how you do? I am pretty sure you'd be more successful as a 25 year old.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/17 11:55 PM
1

Can get, yes. Would the woman prefer a younger man, also yes. Nah, there's women out there that would never date a younger guy just like there is women that would never date a shorter guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/17 11:54 PM
1

“sexually desirable” / “lust”. I mean that takes a lot for a man. The average guy doesn't even come close.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/17 11:43 PM
1

I highly doubt that there are any males over 30 years old that can look that good physically. David Gandy. Easy. He's certainly past his peak now, but 5-6 years ago, I don't think there is many people that can match that, not even the hottest guys in their 20's.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/17 11:23 PM
1

Considering thin women with big tits and big asses actually do exist it exists but it is very rare. It is way easier to find BBW with big tits and big ass than thin women with it. Didn't really think that one through, did you, slick? I did and I think they really like both. Honestly I am not so convinced a lot of the people that are kinda into it prefer it over the other option, both options are probably way above "average bodies" (according to these people's preference), but obviously the singl…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/17 01:38 PM
1

No, my evidence isn't just BBW; it's BBW vs BHM. The fact that the former is blooming, with some models making three figures per photoshoot, and the latter only exists as a very small niche in the gay community. when it comes down to main preference both are low %. i.e almost everyone would have a slight preference for a healthier type. Another thing: it is very possible to find two quite different things attractive, but you will find one thing slighlty more attractive than the other. Also you c…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/17 11:29 PM
1

It's "widely agreed" among top experts, not among laymen. so it must be true. it is an observable fact. In fact, every scrap of evidence I can find seems to point to the exact opposite. huh? And what is your evidence? "BBW tho" ? lmao dude. I would be legitimately shocked if you could find any evidence pointing out that double digit % of men prefer BBW (i.e that BBW is the most preferable female body type for more than 10% of men, hell I'd even be shocked if it was over 5%). Same goes for muscul…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/17 10:50 PM
1

"Everybody says it, so it must be true." It is a widely agreed upon psychological phenomen supported by stacks and stacks of evidence. Everyone actually object to this idea when they first hear about it, not even the scientists understand why the results are what they are. If you ask men to rate female faces the same faces will generally be selected over and over again. Females rating male faces will have a duality, you will have a bunch of women in difference preference groups, specifically bet…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/17 07:37 PM
1

There's no evidence whatsoever to support this theory. Logic supports it, and also some evidence too. It is widely agreed upon that women's taste in male faces vary widely, between the boyish and the masculine type. As far as body goes. There is no clear cut way for a man to have an attractive body that a lot of women can "get behind". Going to the gym, overrated. Generally speaking there is a larger biological preference for lower body fat, i.e fit /skinny men, but there is still a chunk of wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/17 08:57 AM
1

Well that's interesting, and that result is not surprising at all. Personally I draw a very distinct line between fucking and dating. I would have no problem with fucking most chicks, but when it comes to actually dating it is a different story, and it is not because of what close friends or outsiders would think it is because I don't want to commit my time energy and resources to low quality. Starting and mainting a relationship with someone can be extremely time consuming, thats one of the mai…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/17 08:42 AM
1

Error The requested article is not currently available on this site. Also you can find studies that will support more or less anything these days, so I wouldn't hold too much weight in that. Could you maybe give a rundown about the study ? What the results were and how it was conducted, etc? I don't have any friends so it would not matter This is also a general trend for men, and another reason why they aren't as affected by societal pressure as women are. Men generally have fewer friends, (more…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/17 08:32 AM
2

but they do, there are studies on it any source on that? note average fat/obese chicks, not curvy. Let me ask you this. If you are talking to a random girl, she got big tits and you think that she is really attractive, all your friends keep telling you that tits are disgusting, all your friends prefer women with flat chests. Would this stop you from dating her? Personally it wouldn't stop me, and in practice it wouldn't stop most guys either. On the flip side it would actually stop most women (b…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/17 08:22 AM
1

No, I'm still saying the actual lack of dates comes from a different source And I am saying that the source is because of lack of attraction. If most guys found fat chicks genuinly attractive we wouldn't even be having this discussion. It comes from both sources, but my source is the main one. Does not mean they are not affected at all True, but it is not uncommon for a man to be an "outsider" or to not give a flying fuck, and it is not these guys that go on dates with the fat ugly chicks with n…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/17 08:15 AM
1

Not even close to what? No guy ever would date her? Please guess I changed your view then? You keep talking about this being the main thing I am saying that attraction is the main thing. If guys were actually attracted to fat chicks, A LOT more of them [fat chicks] would be in relationships than what is the case now. I never said no guy would ever date her. There will always be someone though, that will finally date her because society finally said that it is fine. (It would be very few though).…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/17 08:06 AM
1

Completely disagree. The odds of my finding a gf with similar interests to me is extremely low, so basically I end up not caring much about it. I have rather few interests and it is not very many women with any of these interests. As far as what her interests are I don't care much about it (unless they are common interests, which they most likely are not). Probably I would say the fewer interests she has outside of housemaking the better. For me, interests (which are not common with mine) only g…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/17 07:58 AM
2

The main thing keeping men from dating fat women is social pressure, not lack of attraction The attraction is the main thing, social pressure only plays a minor role. CMV. In fact I would go further in saying that every heterosexual man has fantasized about one at least several times in their life. If you mean fat as in thick (I.E OVERWEIGHT but with a lot of curves as well) then sure, a lot of guys certainly has.If you mean the average fat/obese girl, who by the way have more or less no curves …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/17 07:46 AM
3

Men have more varied tastes in women than women do in men. I'm not sure how much clearer I can make this. This might be true, but the difference isn't large. Personally the way I would put it: Men's preference is more on a wider spectrum, but women's preference vary more between fewer "categories". To Illustrate what I mean with what I just said: Male preference: 5 categories (wider spectrum) but the distribution looks something like this: 10/10/65/10/5. Female preference: 3 categories but the d…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/17 01:46 AM
3

Women are better at intuitive thinking, multi-tasking, and remembering things, as investigations into the brain suggest. Women also attain higher grades on average than men. Well, from the second thing you linked, it shows that men outperform women on standardized tests. The school system favor women, that is a lot of where the "grade gap" comes from. remembering things This depends on remembering what exactly, I highly doubt women on average have better memory than men across the board, for ins…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/17 02:14 AM
1

quality women in their dating pool are now married, engaged, or in an LTR. those would be the low quality women. (If you are talking about women in their thirties).
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/17 01:51 AM
3

Amazing how there is 405+ comments in this thread and I have yet to see a single comment answering your question logically.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/17 01:47 AM
2

Then he should have worn a condom. It was his choice to cum inside of her and he knew that becoming father is a possibility What you just said here fails on several levels.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/17 01:45 AM
4

OK but I guess we can atleast agree that average female faces (without makeup) are around the same as average male faces in terms of attractiveness. Now to body: Again I will have to Agree and Disagree. I agree with you that body is extremely important, if a girl has a nice body then she quickly goes beyond average (overall), and these are not the ones that I was talking about in my original comment. However, I completely disagree with the argument that the average female body is attractive. It …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/17 12:20 AM
1

intersubjective clearly
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/17 07:50 PM
3

complete bullshit, if you saw the average girl without makeup you'd quickly realize that the average guy isn't that far behind. Now also factor in how much girls care about appearance compared to guys. All things accounted for I'd say it probably comes out at about even. I am 100% straight and my attraction toward the average girl without make up is about equal as my attraction to toward the average guy. i.e it is more or less non-existent. I am not sure where this narrative that "average girls"…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/17 06:54 PM
2

what "morality"? JEEZ. please stop commenting on anything that has to do with what is wrong or right. im not religious me neither. it upsets you that they stone faggots so im doing it for you, thats the rationale Unfortunately I think you are the one that is getting upset in this situation. Your poorly thought out opinion got exposed pretty hard. Why did you talk about my "emotional manipulation" not working lol? Another major fail. It worked, that's why you've been so emotional the last hour.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/17 07:52 PM
1

ok then that isn't inconsistent with the view that "anything is fine" as long as you follow the rules. I didn't read the put me in charge part. This however is for sure inconsistent: its always fine to shame people and its always fine to ignore shaming and do as you please if its not illegal. not "following the rules" is fine too Also I think the statement: "not following the rules is fine too" is inconsistent within itself. By fine I guess you mean acceptable behaviour? Why should someone be pu…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/17 07:35 PM
1

Not even sure if I should bother pointing out the obvious contradictions but ill do it quickly. its always fine to shame people and its always fine to ignore shaming and do as you please if its not illegal. its not fine if you "break the rules". meanwhile: not "following the rules" is fine too Also: i dont give a fuck if muslims stone gays, thats their culture, not mine. so why do you care about nuking the place? if i were leader, nuking the middle east for you to get rid of all those muslims wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/17 07:11 PM
3

ill nuke the whole middle east for you, ok? I think we should stop it here. It is clear that you shouldn't be making comments about what is fine and what isn't. You're being completely inconsistent here first you say that "anything" is fine as long as you follow the rules. Then you say this...
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/17 06:33 PM
1

in certain places around the world it is fine to stone gay people to death, and this is perfectly legal, I guess that is okay too?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/17 06:13 PM
2

its always fine to shame so in your logic you don't see anything wrong with shaming people for being gay? that's interesting. As long as it is nothing illegal gay people should just ignore it and move on, am I right?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/17 06:06 PM
1

how do you explain Žydrūnas Savickas (Lithuanian powerlifter and professional strongman)? When he was 40 years old he placed second in Worlds strongest man 2015, the guy that won was 33. Zydrunas has been winning international strongman competitions nonstop since he was pretty much 27-28 and he is widely considered the greatest strongman of all time. Another example is John Brzenk who is widely considered the greatest arm wrestler of all time. He has been dominating the sport since his teens pre…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/17 04:11 AM
1

The manager in his 30's didn't achieve that position overnight. He would have been geared towards that trajectory in his younger days. obviously but while on the trajectory he had little to no status, he only obtained high status after he reached that point or as he was about to reach it, not 10 years prior to that.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/17 03:11 AM
2

There is no way that 30+ men are more physically attractive than they were in their twenties, unless they make a lifestyle change like losing weight. Jason momoa The only way that a man can increase his attractiveness as he gets older is through personality/life experience and increasing social status. This obviously factor into it. Things like this greatly help men, but not so much women. The big problem is that most men have already made their mark in social status whilst they are in their twe…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/17 03:09 AM
1

that men first think: "is she hot?" and then worry about all the other stuff after. and men will fuck a woman even if they don't think she's smart/personable/funny/etc. she just has to be hot. generally speaking yes, the average guy will be exactly like this. All I am saying is that there exists environments where this is not the case, or atlaset where intelligence is far more likely to be #1 on the bucket list than what it is generally. that men first think : "is she smart?" and then worry abou…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/17 02:47 AM
1

what are you even saying man? smart people will socialize with smart people, period (regardless of gender). This is just what happens in 'intellectual' environments. Also In 'intellectual environments', everyone is smart anyway. The best performers in said environment are usually some of the most social as well. Why wouldn't a guy that is interested in learning talk to a girl he can learn something from ?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/17 02:12 PM
1

certainly but being smart is a factor that can help and even out a bit from what you are lacking in the looks department (depending on environment of course). I'd easily date a less good looking girl if I knew that I could benefit from it (i.e a girl that is extremely high performing in the same major as me). The higher performing the less I would care about her looks, and i'm not even joking.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/17 11:31 PM
1

you can get a bf by only being smart, assuming that you are smart enough of course. But now it is on you though, would you be attracted to a man only for how smart he is? Even 5'6 asian Eugene? Obviously 7 foot chad, or even most average guys don't give a flying fuck whether or not you're top 1% intelligence or whatever, but I think that goes both ways between the genders. If you're a high performer in grad school for (male dominated) stem you will have no trouble finding a bf (for only how smar…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/17 11:09 PM
1

You don't necessarily lose attractiveness at the same rate after your peak as you gained attractiveness before your peak. yeh, that is very true, but if you were really hot at 24, and suddenly you dropped considerably by the time you are 25, I wouldn't consider 24 a peak, I would probably say that at 24 you weren't really as hot as you thought you were, as I said generally speaking, people don't change that much in just 1 or maybe even 2 years. But obviously every specific case is different.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/17 08:33 PM
1

yeh sure, peak probably is around 20-21 I would say. "Peak" just means it's the most attractive you'll ever be. Everything before it was an incline, everything after is a decline. yes exactly, so if 24 is the peak, at what age would you say you are of the same attractiveness as when you were 20? If lets say you are a 8/10 when you are 20, and a 10/10 when you peak (at age 24) and as it starts declining (essentially to a point where you are not attractive at all), at what age are you a 8/10 again…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/17 08:16 PM
1

Eh I think it's more like 28, 35 if you are talking striclty physical attractiveness then this is so wrong it's not even funny, peak physical attractiveness is way lower for both genders.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/17 07:58 PM
1

why not? if 20 is the peak then you'd still look good at 22 or 23. if 23 or 24 is the peak, then why are 28 year olds considerably worse looking than 19-20 year olds?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/17 07:57 PM
1

obviously depends quite a bit on how you define mathematician/expert. I'd consider a research (professional) mathematician an expert. But generally the term mathematician is quite arbitrary, usually the line is drawn at either master/phd in math. But generally we are talking top percentile here. Not most 'math majors' or top 50% of math majors. You can be in a class with 50 other math majors and it is not super unlikely that the situation is that not even a single one is able to become a researc…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 10:30 AM
1

Why being an expert/mathematician is unrealistic? do you think anyone can be one? do you think it is realistic to dedicate your whole life to math? This is pretty much a "prerequisite" in order to reach that point if you don't have the ability, and even then you still might fail. That's why it is unrealistic. It's unrealistic for most people, simple as that. It is not the same as being number one you do realize that right? sure, but it is expected that you are within a certain percentile, which …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 10:10 AM
1

Why not? I don't care whether other people do it better? probably because you have a completely different goal. if your goal was to be very competitive, the best or at least one of the best then you would care. If your goal is to learn linear algebra or calculus or whatever, then maybe not. I just want to work as hard as I can and one day I will look back and realize that "I am that idiot who aces math!" Depends on what you mean with "ace" math. If you mean "ace" your goal which also happen to b…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 09:45 AM
1

they can try, but I wouldn't try something that is very competetive, that would be extremely demotivating if I were to be disabled. I am not disabled but I feel the same way about math, and some other things as well, why even bother when someone else is way smarter anyway and makes it way farther with less effort, etc? Just leave these things to the smart people that have the ability to do it, that's how I see it. So should some people never do anything? no, and that is not what I am trying to s…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/17 09:50 AM
1

When is enough, enough? What is the point in being involved in a field like math and spending so much time on it when you won't be able to aim/reach high? double or triple your current workload, and you still won't. I am not sure if this is how you see things, but this is how I see things. If I know I won't be able to reach high, I'd rather not participate at all. If I am playing a video game and know that I will never be able to reach past the 70 or 80 percentile rank no matter how much I pract…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/17 10:15 PM
1

completely agree. being a good mother doesn't have that much to do with your kids having a great childhood it has to do with nurturing them properly. I was thinking of "hard to be a good mother" more in the sense of nurturing their intellect/self-awareness/value system; do you think the average parent does a good job in that sense? no.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/17 04:49 PM
1

Men's SMV actually peaks at 28, if by SMV you mean just good looks, then I completely disagree. Most men are way better looking at 19-23 than at 28. The main reason why some men will look better at 28 29 than at 20 21 is because of way less acne. If you also factor in things like social skills, behavior etc, then I can maybe get behind 28. Maybe they even peak later than 28 now in 2017 with people being less and less social face to face, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/17 07:32 PM
2

of course not but hot women actually can. Most women obviously can't.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/17 11:33 AM
2

hence why women's lives are generally way better and easier (in terms of fun atleast).
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/17 11:26 AM
1

I think that high SMV men have it better than most women, including high SMV women, but that low SMV men have it worse than most women, including low SMV women. Average SMV men have it about the same as average SMV women overall if they are willing to accept that they aren't going to be able to attract the hottest women in most cases. Depends completely on how you define "high" and "low". Average SMV men have it about the same as average SMV This can't possibly be correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/17 11:20 AM
1

Only hot women experience this. How can you or OP truly understand, when neither of you are hot women? You're just as misinformed as the OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/17 11:18 AM
1

I'm talking about in day-to-day life, keeping up with various facts about people you know so you can better accommodate them. I don't think this has necessarily that much to do with genetics. It has more to do with "spaced repetition" I would say, or what you go around thinking about throughout the day. If you think a lot of about other people, then certainly remembering various facts gets easier because on some level you will be remind yourself of these facts by just thinking about said person,…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 02:47 PM
1

remembering people's food allergies? pretty sure that is a man that is the best at that lol... nelson dellis First of all I've yet to see evidence of this, and the things I've listed aren't really things you have a cut-and-dry "world champion" for. They're soft skills. Like how would you even determine who's the best in the world at reading body language you really can't which is why this conversation is pointless imo. It's hard to argue for either side, which is why my view is what it is. It's …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 01:35 PM
2

ohh ok I see, I misunderstood then I think, I tought it was about genetics?. How can women have a "genetic advantage/inherent" over men at those things that you mentioned when the very best practitioners of those said things are most likely all men? but yeah, I see your point about the averages and stuff. Women are certainly better statistically, but I am not so sure if they are better genetically that is my point, and I think making that claim is a bit of a leap. (Not saying women aren't better…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 01:11 PM
1

I can't really think of anything? but maybe you know? socialization I would say upbringing is a better word to use here.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 01:06 PM
1

I don't know, there are plenty of examples of universal beauties. like who? You won't find lot of people who would find scarlett johanson to be just average or ugly. Scarlett doesn't do it for me. In terms of beauty I probably view scarlett less than you do kate. Also I'm pretty sure most people will say kate is better looking than scarlett, not sure though. I'm a bit deviant myself because I'm into overly developed hips. same, + tall of course. I'm into overly developed in general. As long as e…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 08:40 AM
1

how old was the younger brother when he first started how old was the older?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 08:35 AM
2

The top 0.01% of all the things you listed are probably all male, or at least very male dominated. Men dominate the top of pretty much everything, even in "fields" where women are the large majority.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 08:29 AM
1

meh, that's a bunch of bullshit Almost everything you listed comes down to upbringing.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 08:26 AM
1

If you ask men to rate women, some women will have lower variation of rating what kind of women would you say have low variation? give me an example, a picture or something. Kate hasn't an hourglass or pear shape. most women don't, you can actually look this up. Not sure how accurate it is, but you can do a search for female body types and get the approx percentage of how many women has each body type of like 6 or 8 different or whatever. I couldn't find it just now when I tried to search for it…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 08:16 AM
1

And thats how I see it. Chad is not something that just about "anyone" can be. Only the top percentage (in terms of genetics) can be chad's, and it isn't just genetics either, there are certain factors such as health etc that also come into play. How does having INSANE genetics help you if your whole face and body is ruined by being 100-150pounds overweight?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 12:00 AM
1

I don't think a female chad is something "any girl" can achieve with just money and surgery. I think a female chad is straight up good genetics (looks-wise), natural beauty. etc. (same as a male chad).
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/17 06:14 PM
2

This girl is a hit or a miss, far from an universal beauty. I mean, that's literally everyone no? show me someone who isn't? No hips, masculine figure. This is honestly most girls you will see in real life. Kate upton is very "meh" IMO. Not especially beautiful. above average face, above average tits, above average height. Rest is about average.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/17 06:10 PM
1

not really that nitpicky, it's quite clear that they are short and have bad proportions (face vs body size)
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/17 05:47 PM
1

This ig model would be more along the equivalent of a female chad. meanwhile literally everything about her looks is fake
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/17 05:45 PM
2

I am not so sure about that. Finding an attractive girl that has "everything" is probably just as rare as finding an "equal" male. What do you really need as a dude? Face and height mainly. What do you need as a girl? tits (it's not just size, which makes it even more rare), ass, height (atleast to my preference), and face. I have seen guys in real life that has face + height. but tbh, I don't think I've ever seen a girl in real life that has tits + face + ass + height, that shit is even hard to…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/17 10:08 AM
1

what if they are equally hot then? or atleast very close in attractiveness. Assuming this is the best you can ever get. Who are you more inclined to start an LTR with someone who has n count 1 or 2, or someone who has n count in the 3 digits?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/17 10:01 AM
3

Faithful and loyal are one of the most desirable traits a woman can have. High n count woman vs low n count woman. Pretty much every guy would pick the low n count woman for an LTR, even if she is worse looking. Very attractive women with low n count has EXTREMELY high value.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/17 01:29 PM
1

How is more opportunities not a good thing? I think this is a massive example of men projecting their sexuality onto women Even so, it is still an advantage I am pretty sure? If suddenly getting casual sex for women would be near impossible, I think most women would consider that a bad thing (despite the fact that they generally don't want it as much as men).
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/17 04:56 PM
1

Lots of women are open to dating guys they wouldn't casually fuck. are you sure about that? from what I have seen/heard it is the complete opposite. Sometimes I will hear girls say they would fuck a shorter dude but never date one, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/17 04:52 PM
1

The science is settled. Men on average have a higher IQ than women. Statistically yes, but there is still a chance it comes down to other factors than genetics. and the higher IQ people are always the men. same thing Men built cities, nations, ships, technology, culture, science, language. What did build? What have women done to prove their equality to men? Sure there have been a few upstanding women here and there, but overall human history has been the collaborative effort of men! And the main…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/17 03:27 PM
1

This is pretty hard to deal with tbh. The only way I guess is to accept reality and possibly give up on things that seem to be way out of reach.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/17 12:08 AM
1

makes completely sense, you are a woman correct? women are by nature not as competitive as men.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/17 12:06 AM
1

well I don't necessarily mean a complete social reject who has never had any friends, that would probably go against my preference. but someone that used to have friends before (low amount) but not anymore, or someone that just moved to a new country, that would be ideal imo.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/17 02:34 AM
1

0
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/17 10:40 PM
21

I'd agree with everything you said except "smart" = money I think a better thing to say would be smart=social status. Women don't care about your IQ or if you're able to solve some crazy equations or whatever, what they care about is your "social network", social dominance and how well you can carry a conversation, make people laugh, etc. This is what women see as "smart".
/r/MGTOW11/07/17 04:19 AM
13

smart=socially smart
/r/MGTOW11/07/17 02:45 AM
3

do you prefer introverted or extroverted women? Introverted with preferably no friends. firstly, are you extroverted or introverted yourself? introverted for sure, generally I don't like talking to people, and I absolutely hate drinking smoking partying and anything about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/17 02:28 AM
1

You just proved yourself wrong though? By the fact that women see low SMV men so vastly more "negatively" from how men see low SMV women. Clearly low SMV men = invisible. low SMV women = not invisible.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/17 05:13 AM
3

don't even bother, this conversation is going way over his head rofl..
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/17 03:31 AM
1

because they are able to factor in non-physical attraction triggers. like what?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/17 01:52 AM
1

They're telling others that their perception of the looks of their SO has changed Their perception of the looks of their SO HAS changed correct, but the looks of their SO doesn't change. What are you on about?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/17 12:22 PM
1

They're telling others that their perception of the looks of their SO has changed for the better--and markedly for the better--from their initial evaluation. That's just a lie or self-delusion. The self delusion is on your end, provide evidence or get outta here buddy.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/17 01:47 AM
1

ITT: a bunch of bullshit This is called the halo effect. When you start liking someone or if someone has a very positive trait it will start overshadowing their negatives. Can a not-so-great-looking person become better-looking in your eyes somehow as you get to know them if their personality is great, or they're hilarious, or they're super-cool or something? Yes, this is factual. How else do you think people manage to rationalize that their SO is a 10/10? Can a supermodel become uglier in your …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/17 01:28 AM
1

ITT: a bunch of bullshit This is called the halo effect. When you start liking someone or if someone has a very positive trait it will start overshadowing their negatives. Can a not-so-great-looking person become better-looking in your eyes somehow as you get to know them if their personality is great, or they're hilarious, or they're super-cool or something? Yes, this is factual. How else do you think people manage to rationalize that their SO is a 10/10? Can a supermodel become uglier in your …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/17 01:25 AM
1

ITT: a bunch of bullshit This is called the halo effect. When you start liking someone or if someone has a very positive trait it will start overshadowing their negatives. Can a not-so-great-looking person become better-looking in your eyes somehow as you get to know them if their personality is great, or they're hilarious, or they're super-cool or something? Yes, this is factual. How else do you think people manage to rationalize that their SO is a 10/10? Can a supermodel become uglier in your …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/17 01:24 AM
1

ITT: a bunch of bullshit This is called the halo effect. When you start liking someone or if someone has a very positive trait it will start overshadowing their negatives. Can a not-so-great-looking person become better-looking in your eyes somehow as you get to know them if their personality is great, or they're hilarious, or they're super-cool or something? Yes, this is factual. How else do you think people manage to rationalize that their SO is a 10/10? Can a supermodel become uglier in your …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/17 01:24 AM
1

ITT: a bunch of bullshit This is called the halo effect. When you start liking someone or if someone has a very positive trait it will start overshadowing their negatives. Can a not-so-great-looking person become better-looking in your eyes somehow as you get to know them if their personality is great, or they're hilarious, or they're super-cool or something? Yes, this is factual. How else do you think people manage to rationalize that their SO is a 10/10? Can a supermodel become uglier in your …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/17 01:23 AM
1

hmm idk, I find it funny because I am not used to people like this. The guy is a complete clown, and very immature and with no filter. He says the most retarded shit 24/7. The sad part is that he's not even trying, he's just naturally funny because of his behavior and the over the top stuff he constantly says.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/17 07:46 PM
1

well tbh he's the type of dude that people usually laugh at, not with. No fucking clue how he does it but he is a complete fucking clown, but also far more socially open than most people. I think him being genuinely retarded and immature gives him a massive advantage in this regard. He's not even trying to be funny, he just is.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/17 07:37 PM
1

I would say in order to be witty you would need to have a certain amount of logic, but not nessersarily the other way around. this is completely false, atleast from my experience. The funniest guy I know off irl is also the guy with the least logic. (and his logic is EXTREMELY LOW, I highly doubt he would be above any baseline whatsoever). He just says and does random dumb shit 24/7 and it's hilarious.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/17 06:20 PM
1

confidence on a woman is usually a detriment. Looks is pretty much the only thing that matters, and thats the honest to god truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/17 05:59 PM
–

what kind of career would that be? that you take so seriously?? come on lol, just admit you'd easily "step down" for chad.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/17 03:12 PM
3

work part time I wouldn't even want to work at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/17 08:18 PM
1

Because proportions. If you have an abnormal long torso and short legs, then I would definitely recommend limb lengthening. If you do both tibias and femurs you can safely get up to 4 inch increase maybe 4.5. For limb lenghening to even be worth it in the first place you need to be able to get several inches and that also without fucking up your proportions, the procedure is extremely expensive and time consuming. Doing both tibia's and femurs will leave you crippled and stuck in a wheelchair fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/17 09:25 PM
1

I really hate when people aren't concise, it isn't just women, but it is mostly women in my experience. How is it possible to say so much yet so little? Actually gets me really annoyed when people do that, and I am actually putting effort into being EVEN more concise in my speech, it is the best way to talk, and especially if you are talking in front of a group.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/17 09:00 PM
3

Don't listen to a single word of what this guy is saying. Limb lengthening unfortunately is not a particularly viable option. If there is plastic surgery to consider it is mainly face surgeries to fix deformities, i.e jaws, nose etc. Other stuff to consider is to replace all your teeth, or hair transplant (depending on how heavily you are balding).
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/17 08:37 PM
1

I do think they allow for nutritional and other environmental effects in this case. Though everyone of them will defend that at the very least a large part of the gap is genetic. I am not so sure about that. According to the head/brain size correlation to IQ african americans should be 0.09SD below whites, but statistically they are actually 1SD below. (asians have the largest brain then whites then blacks, if you were wondering). Additionally blacks have the same brain size at birth as whites, …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 11:02 PM
1

http://www.matthewckeller.com/Mitchem_FaceAttInt_2015.pdf I think this is a better study than the stuff the kanazawa guy is doing, better methodology (imo) AND it is also more recent. 2014/2015 tldr: No relationship between intelligence and facial attractiveness in a large, genetically informative sample
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 10:54 PM
1

wtf? I am not? I get 140 on the mensa tests but this is stuff I have practiced. I consider myself pretty good at inductive reasoning so the type of problems mensa will give you, I would also consider myself pretty good at diagrammatic reasoning which is another form of iq test. Also I would say I am good at memory specifically visual (imagine a large grid with a lot of boxes lightening up for a quick second, then turns off and you have to click the ones that lightened up). maybe not top 1 or 2% …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 10:18 PM
0

No it says "SAT 1". Can you not read? That website has conversions for multiple types of SAT exams throughout the years, the page I specifically linked to was for the SAT 1, not the one issued prior to 1995. I'm really fucking confused now... lol. Yes, it says sat 1 that is the one you linked? do you mean I should click on the SAT to IQ instead of the SAT 1 to IQ ? I just clicked on the exact link that you linked me and scrolled down. I am not american so i am not entirely sure how this stuff wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 09:52 PM
1

What are you talking about? There is still a conversion. If you take your math score and your verbal score (out of 1600), you can get a conversion to IQ. The SAT is still reasoning based. From the thing you just linked. (when I said 1995 earlier I meant 1994). Note: Mensa considers that scores from after January 31, 1994, "No longer correlate with an IQ test." If I take my V+M score and use the sat conversation, my IQ ends up being 1 point off what I score on standford Binet tests. Which is pret…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 09:35 PM
1

No you just use a different conversion for SAT tests after a certain time. And you only use math and verbal, not the whole score. I know, and that is what they have always used, it is not accurate anymore, it was accurate before.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 09:21 PM
1

ok that is pretty interesting, I was actually not aware of it. From my experience there is just way more attractive people at the gym for instance than in my STEM grad classes. (for both genders).
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 09:20 PM
1

Have you never had to take standardized tests while in school? I used to have to take them all throughout school (middle school, high school). You can extrapolate based on that if you don't want to take an actual test. It's pretty consistent. Absolutely not. Specially not if you took your SAT after 1995 (I think it is). It specifically says that after 1995 these conversations can't be used. The way this thing work is that if you score within x percentile on the SAT then you are within the x perc…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 09:08 PM
1

And I'm attractive According to who? Almost everyone, regardless of gender overrate their own attractiveness, the way you see yourself in the mirror is way different than the way other people will see you. ..and had many attractive peers in my chemical engineering courses. We are talking about people in their prime age, your view is skewed. You need to compare your peers to other people in the same age bracket. Edit: also since you are the one that said it, where is your source that says that at…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 08:57 PM
1

yeah idk, its going to be way too hard to debate this now that I think about it, it's just way too subjective. The head of the nerd is quite narrow and I would personally consider that a negative. Additionally the guys you linked seems to be a bit on the chubby side, I think their face would look better if they were skinnier. Seems pretty even. With everything controlled for (age, body fat%) I think the guys you linked would probably be better looking.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 05:50 PM
1

link me a picture of a face that you would consider average and lets debate it. And no, don't link me any fatties with a double chin, we're talking about genetics here, facial structure, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 05:37 PM
1

what about him is attractive if you don't mind me asking? That he is really smart? Sure that is attractive. He is no elon musk sure I will agree with that but the guy is pretty fucking average looking (genetically), lets be real here, he might even be slightly below average looking I would say. I am not seeing why his facial structure is anything special, and his hairline is definitely not ideal, seems to be receding a bit on the side.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 05:33 PM
1

A good read that I think you would find interesting. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%C3%A1szl%C3%B3_Polg%C3%A1r László Polgár (born 11 May 1946 in Gyöngyös), is a Hungarian chess teacher and educational psychologist. He is the father of the famous "Polgár sisters": Zsuzsa, Zsófia, and Judit, whom he raised to be chess prodigies, with two of them becoming the best and second best women chess players in the world. He is also considered a pioneer theorist in child-rearing, who believes "geniuses ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 05:08 PM
1

https://gyazo.com/c9fc0902b05ce4e2dcfe0270beb5bb26 This is the IQ test I took: http://test.mensa.no/ The danish one is similiar, and I got a similiar result on that one too. On the swedish one (which you have way less time one) I got the max score. And the swedish one is also way more realistic, because when you go and take the mensa test irl time is a real worry, you got even less time irl than on the swedish one. You can link me any iq test based on (inductive reasoning) aka figure reasoning o…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 04:39 PM
1

The volunteers each took a battery of tests that examined 17 separate abilities, including verbal and spatial working memory verbal knowledge These things are as trainable as your bicep muscles. just go to the gym. Ever heard of dual n back for instance? who has actually shown to be able to increase IQ. Explain why it is so easy to increase your iq scores through practice? Explain why educated/academia ics people do better on iq tests Explain why someone that is very interested in IQ tests/puzzl…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 04:20 PM
1

that is not true. Wasnt there this study that claimed that even after 2SD above the mean women still wanted bigger? (If I recall correctly) According to some research where they measure flaccid penis length and estimate the errect size they found that the average penis size in france is over 6 inches or something like that? (google penis size by country, or something along those lines). 2SD above a mean of 6' or 5.5' would be way above 7'.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 03:58 PM
1

that's news to me. Anyone that is born healthy and didn't get fucked over by their parents could probably be top 10% maybe top 5%, top 1%. It is extremely easy to superficially increase iq test results, IQ tests are not a good measure.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 03:31 PM
2

You can say that that lack of effort in their looks makes them less attractive to you, but you can't say they're genetically ugly. maybe not ugly because that is such a strong word, they are not disgusting/hard to look at I will definitely agree with that. But how can you deny that they are both below average looking? That seems like a pretty far jump imo. I don't think attractive people are intelligent but I think a lot of people underestimate intelligent people's genetic attractiveness because…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 03:26 PM
3

I know exactly what you are talking about, I updated my comment above and included a male example. Again are you able to find ANYONE that is currently in their early twenties that are smarter then the two people I linked you a picture of? I highly doubt it. The pictures are of Lisa Sauermann and Gennady Korotkevich. What do you study btw? I study stem myself and in any single of the grad classes I am currently taking there is not even a single girl that im sexually attracted to that says a lot, …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 03:10 PM
2

Young Steve Jobs looks quite attractive. steve jobs can't even be compared to the top of the top on the intelligence scale. LOL. A young elon musk on the other hand.... This is what your typical extremely intelligent TOP NOTCH stem female look like https://gyazo.com/a2cb97c7d9f2396fd989a35a6470048f considering she looks like that I am glad on behalf of her that she pick'd STEM rather than something that is a lot more about networking and being social, like business. Here's an example of a super …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 02:53 PM
2

what ? personality is genetic? If you believe everything is deterministic, then sure I can see that argument I guess, but at that point everything is 100% genetic isn't it?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 02:23 PM
3

Attractiveness and intelligence are positively correlated. Explains why every stem nerd is super attractive. And why every instagram model is far above average intelligence
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 02:18 PM
1

because intelligence is far more controllable? you can't change your height...
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 02:17 PM
0

If men are much smarter they aren't?? where do you have this from?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/17 12:36 AM
1

I stopped chasing money for this reason. It's just depressing how much cam girls and youtubers are able to make with absolutely no skill.
/r/MGTOW29/04/17 06:07 PM
1

what about jason momoa? A lot of people say he was more attracitve (physically) in his 30's than 20's. but I dunno.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 06:19 PM
1

I guess it depends on perspective, also I think being a TA is a bit different where I live. TA's don't grade people, they are literally just there so you can ask questions related to the course. I am not entirely sure how "office hours" work but how the stuff TA's do over here work is that people show up to a room and start solving problems, if they need help they can ask the TA. This is literally how math in middle school works where the teacher would talk on the blackboard for the first hour a…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/17 03:25 PM
2

a body builder could easily be in the obese category from mainly muscle. Maybe not if he's under 10% body fat, but it isn't hard for a body builder to be obese on the BMI scale meanwhile looking like someone who's slightly above normal weight with clothes on. Here is just an example: (watch the first 20 seconds) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8pp3rZSum7s Tom martin is I believe 178cm (5'10) (he might be a couple cm taller/shorter) and 110kg (242lbs, as seen in the video). Does he look obese? No…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/17 03:41 AM
1

Grad school doesn't make you popular. Do you want me to break it down to you how being in grad school can make you popular? It won't make you popular automatically, and I am not saying that it is easy to become popular. I am saying that being in grad school and being knowledgeable is a good place to start if you want to start making friends with people, and by getting friends you are also getting status. Be a TA. A lot of students know who are you, immediately. A lot of students show up and ask …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/17 03:05 AM
1

you're having a tough time tonight. I can tell. There are alternatives to women. Validation from professional achievement is one of them. Trust me, it lasts a lot longer. but that is not what we were discussing. I didn't make a point about that? my point was about women not validation, and you responded to it. Doesn't look like you understood anything at all? Are you comprehension challenged? A 26 year old man has better things to do than to chase women. why did you comment to me in the first pl…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/17 02:27 AM
2

A 26 year old man has other sources for getting validation. Making major contributions is one of them. What does that have to do with women? dawg? This entire comment thread is about women. not validation LOL. You were the one who claimed that people join grad school for enhanced status. Scroll up. where did I claim that? In several comments above I claimed that on its own it doesn't enhance your social status. YOU said average looking 26 years olds get women because grad school. fucking LOL. fr…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/17 02:03 AM
2

The point is obvious. What do you study in grad school? mathematics If you joined grad school for the wrong reasons ("social status"), it isn't the end of the world. You can always leave. I know that grad school doesn't imply social status, you are the one that is making the argument, by responding to my comment saying that it doesn't. your argument for why 26 year olds get women through status is literally "but grad school tho", "contributions tho". Which simply isn't true, most women doesn't g…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/17 01:41 AM
2

You seem needlessly agitated. well you're claiming that im wrong, but getting completely smashed in the discussion? You haven't even provided a single logical argument? If you joined grad school for the wrong reasons ("social status"), it isn't the end of the world. You can always leave. what is your point? lol dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/17 01:33 AM
2

ok so what are you trying to say? what exactly am I wrong about? Are you trying to say that 26 year olds in grad school has made important contributions or that being a grad students automatically implies high status? or both? and why is that? you couldn't even refute my point logically.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/17 01:13 AM
2

and why is that? what are you in grad school for if I may ask? or what is your degree in?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/17 01:06 AM
1

what makes you say that? I know everything about grad school LOL.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/17 12:58 AM
3

Most 26 year olds aren't like that. Additionally, why would anyone care? when people talk about status (in this age bracket) it has to do with popularity and money. Being smart and X years into grad school is merely a tool to obtain status, but it doesn't imply status, just being smart obviously isn't enough to have people care about you.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/17 04:35 PM
2

college aged I guess, 18-26 something around that probably. What I am trying to say is that I think it is completely understandable for an average guy who's 21 22 or 23 to complain about that. For the most part money and status won't help you pull girls when you're in this age (because you won't have it/enough of it). Sure some people in this age do have high status because they are very popular in their local community, but thoes people are rather rare in the first place and also more often tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/17 03:53 PM
3

80/20 what else is there to say? If you're a young male, attractiveness is more or less all you have to go off in order to be in the top 20.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/17 03:42 PM
–

a 5/10 with a job is more or less the same as a 5/10 without a job, that is what im trying to say. a 6/10 without a job against a 5/10 with a job and with an education, which one is better is obvious, and its obviously the girl that is a 6/10.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/17 03:38 PM
–

what are you trying to say? The thing about age is universal, and apply to both genders. The thing you are talking about with education, job etc. That is definitely not expected of women, neither is a good personality tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/17 12:06 PM
2

physical appearance willing to have sex often These two things must be in place, all the others things on the list ss just a microscopic bonus. Ill gladly take a 7/10 who's willing to have sex often over a 6/10 who's also willing to have sex often, but additionally has income, education and intelligence, etc. That should probably say a lot about how little these "secondary features" that you listed matter. I guess if I had to pick a third, it would probably be sexual/relationship history.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/17 11:41 AM
3

it's a bit odd imo, considering that you will occationally hear women say that a dick can become too big.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/17 11:26 AM
1

ok so women want as tall as possible as wide as possible and as big of a dick as possible, did I get that right? Only thing is that it means less and less as it gets bigger? Also men's expectations is literally one thing: DO NOT BE FAT, and even to that there is some expectations. Seems like TRP is wrong. Women are even pickier for finding men attractive than top 20% that gets parroted. idk this study seems more to go off ideals. The fact that the top 20% of men get more or less all the women is…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/17 07:05 AM
1

exactly, so what do you think is the difference on someone that "makes it" and someone that doesn't?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/17 09:31 PM
1

Well, everyone can't become instagram models, but how do you explain that some "average" girls, are straight up hotter than some instgram models that can have anywhere from 50k+ followers? This is what I am trying to say, you can't just rely on your looks and not put in any real effort and suddenly become famous... Also the hardest part is to get ur social media rolling, once you got a fair bit of followers, suddenly it will explode, specially if you get shoutouts from other famous people in the…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/17 09:26 PM
1

thats true,but wasn't the comparison average with really high intelligence vs average with really high beauty? something like that. Most hot people that you see in your day to day life, aren't really on that scale. Also a lot of these people probably could become instagram models if they were bigger on social media, and actually wanted to create a large platform. There are people that are extremely hot but doesn't take advantage of it in that way, same thing wiht people that are extremely smart,…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/17 08:32 AM
1

Do you want or value a woman being interesting? don't think I'v ever seen an interesting woman in real life before, so I wouldn't really know. The main/only thing I care about is whether or not she looks good. How often do you find an interesting and physically attractive woman? How often do you find an interesting woman that's not physically attractive? How often do you find an interesting woman that's incredibly physically attractive? more or less never. Why do you think it is this way? becaus…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/17 06:14 PM
1

I will have to disagree. Many years ago (10years ago+ ) I would probably agree, but now with the rise of social media, a huge following/network is worth more than gold. Having a large following is probably the best thing to have if you're trying to become a successful CEO. Being popular helps with that, and being attractive helps with being popular.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/17 12:27 AM
1

of course it isn't but "skill" doesn't make someone a billionaire, neither does being intelligent. Actually skill alone can land you maybe a $150k job tops which is less than almost all management/executive positions. The most intelligent people on the planet are successful research scientists, not CEO's.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/17 12:10 AM
1

yeh idk, being good with people and being big on social media just seems to become more and more important every single year, imagine in a generation from now, when all the big CEO's are the people that grew up with social media. I was watching Andy Milonakis' livestream the other day and he goes to a store shows the employees a tweet from a couple weeks ago where the CEO of tmobile told him that he should try out their products and that he could hook him up with it for free, the employees were …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/17 12:07 AM
1

Sure, assuming they are in your industry. That being said, it doesn't trump skill and competence. depends on the job/industry. Being best friend and knowing high ups in a company can get you way further than skill and competence tho, you can actually get a management position with literally zero competence. Barely a 6 figure salary won't even put you in the top 10% so I am wondering why you think skill alone get people so far? An software engineering job at google/microsoft probably puts you in …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/17 11:15 PM
1

$50k is not wealthy. what do you mean? are you saying that getting $50k cash to go on a 1-2 week vacation to visit a random prince from dubai isn't much? "Friends/connections" is not the same as social media following from strangers. it isn't, but it certainly does help create opportunities (having strangers following you), and it also helps with getting more friends/connections and meeting new interesting people both in and outside the social media modeling/entertainment world. Also in the star…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/17 10:53 PM
1

true, but wouldn't you say having more opportunities in life, and having those coming to you gives you a massive advantage in terms of this regard? As I said in another comment, there is more likely for average/slighly below average looking smart guy to be sitting alone at the lunch table, and be a complete social reject compared to chad. Chad just gets more experience, friends and connections naturally. Average looking guy (doesn't matter if he is smart or not) actually has to work a lot for th…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/17 10:23 PM
1

Are you sure about that? Some of these attractive women will never in their life have to work thanks to social media. 1-2 week vacation to dubai come back $50k richer? yes please. This is actually the reality for a lot of these girls, specially the ones with larger followings. (if your amount of followers in the 5 or 6 digits). Who would you rather be friends with, a social reject who sat alone at the lunch table in high school and has very few if any friends/followers? Or would you rather be fr…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/17 10:20 PM
1

More or less any executive or management job pays more. What is the average salary for these jobs that you listed? Do you think having a "basic" job like that put you in the top 10% in terms of earnings? Being good at "politics" and having good social skills is more or less a requirement if you want to be within the top 5% in terms of income.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/17 10:12 PM
1

of course, but beauty => popularity (atleast more or less). It also gets you a huge social media presence with a lot of followers and friends. The kind of guys you're thinking of probably do have mild autism. or maybe they just spend so much time studying that they never developed their social skills properly. Most these guys I am talking about doesn't actually have autism, but they don't start developing their social skills before grad school or at the very least undergrad, where they finally g…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/17 04:46 PM
1

dude you're full of shit. People ASSUME that attractive people are smart, but that is the extent of it. If there actually was a legitimate correlation there would be a ton of attractive people doing well in stem, the most intellectually demanding field. What they found was that successful people in STEM are far more intelligent than successful people in the social sciences. What I also found (from my own personal experience) is that attractive people are more likely to study something like busin…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/17 04:37 PM
1

ofc
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/17 04:25 PM
2

Why are there so many super intelligent people that are complete social rejects? You'd think some of these guys actually have autism because their social skills are so bad, but I guess being intelligent just automatically makes your social skills insanely good... Being popular, "natural leader" and chad has a far greater impact on someone's social skills. One get all the opportunities handed to them, while the other has to create every single opportunity for himself.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/17 04:14 PM
2

huh? if you are within the top percentage on the beauty scale you have people coming up to you, talking to you constantly. People also assume that you have a bunch of friends and that your social skills are good. People want to talk and get to know people like that, it's that simple. There is quite a correlation between beauty and popularity. I think it is safe to assume that the likelihood of a smart but avearge guy to be a social reject compared to chad is quite high. Chad or whatever just get…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/17 03:52 PM
3

idk about the first one there bud. Being good at social skills, politics and 6'6 with a bunch of connections or whatever seems better than being the average 5'9 with really high intelligence. Additionally the guy with beauty will have others think highly of him, and assuming that he is extremely intelligent, funny and a natural leader all automatically, meanwhile the situation for the other guy is the complete opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/17 03:45 PM
1

The higher up I got the uglier people got. I am not sexually interested in a single girl that go to any of my grad classes, that says a lot. Meanwhile in undergrad there were a shit ton of hot girls, sure there were a lot more girls in the first place too, but still... I am not really seeing any correlation here. A lot of the guys that go to these classes are also quite hideous. If I go to the gym or something immediately I see a bunch of people far more attractive (regardless of gender) and it'…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/17 03:29 PM
1

I am not so sure about that, name a couple high paying professions where skill overwhelmingly determine your worth? People for the most part don't give a flying fuck about skill thats the thing and this is why it is the socially successful /attractive people that end up with the high paying professions/positions (management positions etc) and they are also the ones that end up getting hired by the company in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/17 03:22 PM
2

Smart people are more likely to be beautiful. Great explanation for why stem nerds and professional scientists/researchers are above average on the beauty scale. I was wondering why they all were so beautiful, I guess it is because they are so increadibly smart.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/17 03:18 PM
2

I am not sure what your point is? That chad loses when he gets older because then he is no longer a chad? A 25 year old chad can get women, pussy and relationships whenever he want, and all he has to do is exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/17 01:54 PM
1

In this day and age when everyone got money people don't care that much if you are well off (realistically). Making millions isn't very realistic. Women in their prime age want chad, not a 45 year old with a lot of money.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/17 01:30 PM
0

ITT: dumb people saying they'd rather want to be smart. The question is literally asking would you rather be tall or muscular? One of the options is quite controllable, while the other comes almost purely down to genetics. If you ever got fucked over when it comes to genetics you'd know how much it sucks that no matter the effort, shit won't change. I'd literally put in thousands of hours to change some of these "uncontrollable's", unfortunantly it isn't possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/17 03:47 AM
1

I'd rather be "beautiful" because being smart is far more controllable.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/17 03:28 AM
2

you're not going to look that different at 28 than you did at 25. you'd be surprised. Anyway difference from lets say 20 and 28 is massive. women at the age of 30 aren't invisible, that was pretty much the only thing in your comment that is actually correct, but they still hit the wall in the sense that their SMV most likely has dropped drastically. HOT 30 year olds do exist, but on average a 28 or 30 year old woman don't even stand a chance against the younger girls. People claiming that women …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/17 03:19 AM
1

What they found was that men prefer women that are around their height (slighly shorter), generally 2-3 inches shorter is what they found, meanwhile the women preferred men that were almost a foot taller. This was more or less true regardless of said's person height.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/17 05:44 PM
1

height is a factor. If you are taller than the women you are interested in that is the bare minimum requirement. But height will always be a factor. Generally speaking, the taller you are compared the girl, the larger are your chances. At 6'2 compared to a guy that is 6'5 you will struggle to get girls that are lets say 5'11.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/17 05:27 PM
1

I am not entirely sure what you mean with "tall enough". Generally speaking I would say the taller the better. If you like tall women 5'9 or 5'10+ I wouldn't say 6'2 is a particularly good height, but it is good in the sense that it is well above average (depending on environment), and in the sense that you will be taller than pretty much any girl. You'd really have to go hit up the women's basketball/volleyball teams at a college to consistently be able to find women taller than 6'2.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/17 05:04 PM
1

idk... the situation for most guys is that they don't really attract women through their looks, so probably you are correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/17 04:01 PM
1

What should small men do if getting muscular isn't even helping? have a good personality I guess? (Which in my opinion means good social skills, know how keep a conversation going, etc). The reality for most guys is that their looks doesn't really attract women period. The effort vs reward for going to the gym isn't really worth it and definitely not if you are short, but it can help. From my experience it works something like this: Frame (height) >>> face >>>> physique. The only thing on this l…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/17 03:01 PM
2

Frame is everything if you're male. Big frame is essentially another way of saying tall endomorph. And one more thing, there is a correlation between shoulder width and height. If you are short most likely your shoulders aren't as wide as you think they are (atleast not in terms of absolutes, but maybe you are wide compared to people around your height).
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/17 02:12 PM
3

I get muscles from little activity therefore I am kinda gifted, but I am not lean, most people that get muscles easily also get fat easily. they are also short. The thing is, when someone says naturally muscular they mean someone who naturally has a big frame and also has some muscle, I though that was quite obvious. Most likely did some activity, if not currently doing, but he doesn't go to the gym 5-6 times a week. There's a difference on someone with a thick waist, thick wrists broad shoulder…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/17 01:47 PM
2

if its that or nothing he should 100% lower his "standards" LOL. Not necessairly because they are too high, but moreso because they are too specific.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/17 10:01 PM
5

it's probably quite high. something something 80 20.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/17 09:59 PM
3

What they actually found is that people with lower iq are more successful in education because they are better at "working" and developed better study habits etc. The only thing IQ says anything about is your ability to do iq tests.
/r/MGTOW05/03/17 04:47 PM
2

The men they marry are low value compared to the men they could have married. Not necessarily low value in the absolute sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/17 10:34 PM
1

well money is the main influence on status, so saying they are the "same" isn't that far from the truth. Someone who has more money will almost always have more status (unless the money difference is just a small amount)
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/17 06:21 PM
0

rich = status.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/17 06:13 PM
1

FEMALE SMV: 100% looks 0% personality 0% status I think thats pretty obvious. FEMALE RMV: 100% looks 0% personality 0% status Personality does absolutely not matter when it comes to relationships with women. I'd give up a 8/10 looks with a 10/10 personality for a 9/10 looks with a 0/10 personality, and I wouldn't even think twice about it. If status does anything it is contribute in the negative direction (rare cases), but it is never a situation where a woman's status would make me want me to d…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/17 05:03 PM
-4

for the age group you are talking about this one is way below average. The first one you linked is probably about average, maybe a little above.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/17 12:35 AM
2

true alphas doesn't exist, everyone has beta traits.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/17 11:30 PM
1

Well having value and a high position is alpha, being a cashier /waiter and being "dominated" by other people for a large part of your life (8 hours a day 5 days a week) is extremely beta. People respect alpha's, not beta's.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/17 11:06 PM
0

Respect for anything and anyone is beta, even your friends and family.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/17 10:53 PM
2

body comes first and face is secondary. tits and ass is the obvious choice. face can be "altered" way too much thanks to make-up etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/17 06:45 PM
1

Outside of sex? Nothing. Women want men that can offer something more. Men just want women for sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 01:22 AM
1

The reason female ego's are inflated is because of male attention or to be more specific attention from attractive men. Women get constant attention and validation from men that they find attracitve and in general men far and above their own level. This is why literally every young woman has an inflated ego. Your "cmv" is stragiht up wrong. if you were trying to say that attention from unattractive men isn't valditating then I would maybe agree with you, but you are actually saying that male att…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 12:50 PM
2

it is and it completely defeats OP's argument. women doesn't just get attention from unattractive men which is why women's ego's are inflated. (going by OP's logic of course)
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 12:36 PM
1

what was it specifically about?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 10:43 AM
1

The privilege to get a wife, for instance. "Peacock as hard as you can, holdframe, be confident, lift weights, and if you're persistent and lucky enough some girl will let you entertain her, feed her, and pay for her. She is not expected to pay for anything, contribute to entertainment (or have any thoughts in general), or even contribute to the conversation. If you're LUCKY you can kiss her goodnight without being a creep. And if you're REALLY lucky you can make a habit of paying for her, worsh…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 08:40 AM
1

You can't judge whether or not a woman is attractive by her face? honestly, no. face is secondary.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/17 05:20 PM
1

Your value as a human being is to which extent you contribute to evolve the super organisms, or to which extent you have a positive impact on the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/17 07:42 PM
–

I'm only including the age range 18-26
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/17 05:06 PM
–

30-40% attractive enough for a relationship 80-90% for just regular sex
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/17 04:49 PM
1

she will cause you to have a boner? That is quite fucking rare, I will see maybe one of those every 3-4 months, and I am not even joking. In 2016 I think I saw 3 girls like that, 2 of which i saw at the gym and 1 that I saw at university. I have yet to see one in 2017. Good enough for sex for me is any women that I would fuck but would not make any effort toward, I evaluate that to be around 85-90% of women in the age range 18-26.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/17 06:27 PM
2

If women's standards for a one night stand are lower than their standards for a relationship, shouldn't we expect that men (even average and below average men) can find a ONS more easily than they can find a relationship? But that doesn't seem to be the case at all. I have heard women (mainly taller ones) ,say they will fuck a shorter man but never date one.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/17 06:10 PM
2

Its quite common if you only look at successful men, in that case and in most such relationships the woman will be more or less worthless in comparison.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/17 06:09 PM
1

what you just wrote make no sense... 40% is genuinely attractive, but only 20% is attractive for sex And then you write: . It's flipped for men. In most cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/17 06:02 PM
1

women while sitting in front of a computer will say that x celeb or whoever is hot as fuck and much better looking than random guy y and this is because they aren't "evaluating" height because they don't notice the difference. It's a reason people like zac efron or whoever get famous for being attractive, despite being short. Assuming zac efron wasnt famous, if women got both options presented in front of them in real life or at the very least both options presented standing next to each other i…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/17 09:21 PM
1

so, would you say a physique like this: https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSC8gRgZYES5o5uHPTHYIaMhIU0hn373LgagPetaWfPQxplR6RQ would get even close to a similar reaction/attention? I would say no. The thing is that what women prefer when they sit in front of the computer online is different from what they prefer when they see the "difference" in real life. It's the same thing with height.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/17 08:40 PM
4

which is not really correlated with mathematical ability
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/17 05:15 PM
2

A man's SMV is in his height and face, hairline, and in his charisma. and his proportions. Anyway how do you explain this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2okh4hdXgOQ ?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/17 04:51 PM
–

But in reality physical attractiveness is mostly objective how so?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/17 02:18 AM
2

sure but women get constantly hit on and validation from men thus boosting their self esteem. A lot of women that are around the range of average HEAVILY overestimate their own attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/17 11:10 PM
2

This is a false analogy. The two situations are completely different. The key difference here is that an unattractive guy for a woman can become attractive for her in the future. My argument here is that what you consider "non-options" can actually be options, meanwhile it is not the case for the gay guy example. sure it might be a bit inconvenient in terms of day to day life, but in terms of finding a partner it is definitely an advantage to have more options, and that pretty much always.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/17 10:28 PM
2

I disagree, everyone had that one girl in class that thought she was the hottest girl at school but in reality was actually below average.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/17 09:16 PM
1

and about average attractiveness doubt it. Most people (actually almost everyone) overrate their own attractivness. Subtract a couple points and your own evaluation of yourself would be more accurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/17 09:07 PM
1

The fact that women are hypergamous is proof enough that they are advantaged. Woman have no trouble attracting men that are slightly higher value than themselves that's exactly why they are hypergamous. The problem is when women think they are good enough for chad but just isn't. A top 50% woman will attract 100's of top 50% men but she will also attract men in the top 40% maybe even top 30%, but definitely not chad.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/17 04:43 PM
3

Women have no trouble attracting 100's of mens of equal value as their own. So maybe that is the problem OP is having. She thinks she is good enough for chad rather than being more in line with her own value like she should be. If you can only attract low value men maybe you are a low value woman. That's how I see it. Women are insanely advantaged in dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/17 12:52 PM
1

women have an INSANE advantage in dating. Factual statement. The fact that most women can pick and choose, and barely even have to put in any effort at all says a lot. Maybe you are only attracting low value men because you are a low value woman? Maybe you should get more in line with what your own value is? Women have no trouble getting 100's of men's of the same value as herself. Why does every woman think she is good enough for chad? LOL. Stop listing completely subjective reasons when dealin…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/17 12:46 PM
1

Should I ban you for that? That shouldn't even be a question going by what you just wrote. What if I end up being a top tier contributor in the future? I hope you understand now why your other comment was just one giga facepalm. Nothing of what you wrote justify rule breaking.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/17 04:52 AM
2

it's ok to break the rules as long as you have genuine desire to learn. got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/17 04:37 AM
1

if you were talking about physical attractiveness I would 100% agree with you. Men's smv can change a lot but their attractiveness is set in stone. For women both their smv and attractiveness is more or less set in stone.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/17 12:12 PM
2

no it isn't, all these points also apply to women
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/17 12:02 PM
2

The only way to change my view here would be to present compelling "semi evidence" (not necessarily scientific) and personal anecdotes about another form of exercise that achieves a similar aesthetic to the pics I showed, in either less time or with greater consistency than powerlifting does. how about logic and reason? Bodybuilding does it in WAY less time, it's not even up for debate, its factual. It's obvious you have no clue about fitness/powerlifting/bodybuilding whatsoever and it becomes e…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/17 04:05 PM
2

2 BY FAR. 1 might even be below average and 3 seems to be around average.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/17 07:49 AM
4

Can you provide evidence for these two claims, if not then I am done here until you actually want to. You don't need hard evidence when you got logic and reason. Everything is probabilistic, just believe what is the most probable.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/17 10:44 PM
-1

you're wrong. you don't normally see really attractive people in real life and if you did you would think they were attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/17 10:06 PM
1

You wouldn't say that it's not wrong for a disabled person to rob a bank just because it's a harder feat to pull off, right? no but it would certainly be more impressive
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/16 07:11 PM
3

This should be written in stone, OP couldn't be more right.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/16 10:17 PM
1

not huge as those can hurt and be impractical this is just plain wrong. The bigger the better, simple as that.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/16 04:48 PM
1

because in the end pussy is still pussy and that's the honest to god truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/16 09:07 PM
2

Most people can become a 9 just no, you can put in all the effort you want but without good genetics you wont get very far.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/16 07:07 PM
3

As tall as possible, so yes, way taller. When girls say "taller than me" they mean the guy that is barely taller than them is the minimum which they consider date-able (which obviously isn't even close to ideal).
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/16 07:13 PM
2

Attractiveness is objective LOL? what did I just read? You even contradicted yourself once you started mentioning preferences, all your preferences makes up what you find subjectively attractive, it is nothing objective about this. Do you know what objective means? pretty much nothing in this world is truly objective.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/16 11:00 PM
1

We all know that male tastes are pretty much the same all over the board, which leads to a conventional attractive female archetype. But female tastes vary greatly Not true. conventional attractive female archetype Now describe me this so called conventionally attractive female. What does it mean when people say "Women like hot guys", do they like "hot" guys or guys that are "hot" to them? This makes no sense at is all since it is completely subjective. People like people that are hot to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/16 10:56 PM
1

this is not an argument lol No you're just wrong and I'm right. good one. Yours is not an argument, but mine is. You thinking in absolutes is exactly why you are wrong and why you are so easy to debunk. You have an "all or nothing" mentality. "X has 0% effect on Y", meanwhile both X and Y are subjective variables, like come on... "if it isn't a complete deal breaker it has no effect and is completely irrelevant". Do you see why this logic is flwaed? Statements like these raises red flags in the …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/16 05:12 PM
1

Because the way you rate someone is through comparison. Otherwise it is impossible to be consistent with your ratings. You can have 100 women rate a man now, and then you can have the same 100 women rate another man lets say a week later, maybe even a month. What will happen is that the women will rate the guys and more or less just come up with arbitrary numbers that don't really mean much. Lets say guy 1 was rated 6.5 on average, guy 2 was rated 5.8, does this mean guy 1 is more attractive? No…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/16 02:52 PM
1

It's just better to view the world in a probabilistic way.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/16 07:29 AM
1

What makes you think that these things arent relevant when judging women? or "not nearly as relevant" ? take voice for example. In my opinion most women (more than 50%) has a voice that is off putting (either annoying or too manly), sure you get used to it eventually but you still get put off a bit (most of the time) when it comes to first impressions.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/16 07:14 AM
2

Men Cannot have an Objective SMV No shit sherlock, no1 can. Women's Taste Differs so Greatly Not as much as men's taste, u have men that like small girls, small tits, big tits, skinny, thick, tall and even morbidly obese. It is also a far more "objective" metric for measuring male attractiveness which is height. There is no female equivalent to this. In my opinion, women need a lot of things to be physically attractive. "An attractive woman is like a man that is tall, with a nice face, good prop…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/16 10:24 PM
0

Because men cannot be judged in photographs, only women can huh? Its far easier to judge men in photos. The taller one is more attractive, done deal. With judging women its far more difficult, female 1 got bigger tits while female 2 is taller and female 3 has the most attractive face, which one is more attractive? how do you weigh these things up against each other? It is not an easy task. I don't get the point of your example, you cant even see the whole person.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/16 10:09 PM
1

yeah exactly, its not hard for a girl to get dick from a guy above her league if she approach first and put in some effort.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/16 02:33 PM
3

easy can mean more than just slut. most likely it is a combination of factors, I dont understand why a hot girl that sleeps with only hot guys is easy for the avearge guy, I dont think anyone thinks like that. when people say a girl is easy, in my opinion is when she is both a slut but also not the most attractive. Lets be real here even below average girls can get dick whenever, and its those girls that are easy, the girls that don't necessarily get that many requests and a lot of the time actu…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/16 02:30 PM
1

First of all...you're proving my point. Your point what that money doesn't matter as much as status. Not just that, my point is also that money isn't everything which you seem to think lol. Your point what that money doesn't matter as much as status. Because money is a function of status. Literally my only argument for that part. Status is a function of money, man. Jesus. Do you understand what a function mean? lol... status is the dependent variable and money is the independent thus money is a …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/16 01:25 AM
1

You just proved my point. No, actually I debunked it. They (CEOs, actors, athletes, entertainers) are the TOP OF THE TOP because they have the most MONEY!!!!!!!!!!!!! You fail to realize that there is other factors that also play a role. it's not just black and white. Again you didn't respond to my example about popular guy in hs/college. You compare some of the richest people in the world to what? obviously being that rich is going to give you a lot of status. Ergo...status is a function of mon…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/16 08:13 PM
2

Because having money is having status.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/16 07:26 PM
1

if a man just had status (i.e. popularity/respect) but, no money, girls would run. Its the money, bro. I disagree. Women are attracted to status or I guess you can say value. They want to be able to show off their man. "my man is 6'4", "my man is a doctor", "my man is a ceo" etc. Yes money equals status but status doesn't necessarily equal money. There's ways about attaining status without having any money. i.e popularity/respect like you mentioned. How do you explain the really popular guy in c…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/16 07:24 PM
2

I didn't read all of it as it was very lengthy, I apologize for that. just going to point out a couple things you seem to have forgotten. I would suggest that if I were to attempt to chat up Christine Marzano, despite the fact that I am significantly better looking than Merchant, more intelligent, I believe funnier than him, and have achieved a modicum of success in life, I would probably have a 1% chance of ever having sex with her. That's an optimistic estimate. Because she'd just look at me a…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/16 01:54 PM
3

I dont see a guy with 8, 10% drowning in pussy compared to 15 or even 20%, most likely the guy on 15 or 20% get more anyway rofl.. Women don't see a nice male body the way men see it. A nice male body from a female point of view is pretty fucking average.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 06:17 PM
2

well they arent staring because they find your physique attractive... lol women dont care much much about that.. sadly
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 05:51 PM
1

people mainly notice height in real life, outside of real life its a metric that is a lot of the time ignored atleast back in the day but not really so much anymore. excluding fame these sex icons or "attractive celebs" under 6' are legitimately nothing when it comes to attracting women in real life. Also if these sex symbols werent famous and had money do you honestly think they would be as attractive "otherwise" as they are now (or once were if you are talking about older people)? Nope. Money …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/16 06:30 PM
2

height is the most important factor for male attractiveness, its also the most genetical one. face and body you can easily improve a lot, given that you dont have abnormal deficiencies.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/16 06:04 PM
1

nah, its more or less all in height.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/16 06:02 PM
1

People don't get any better looking, no matter how long you know them. Actually they do. You're actually denying research rofl...
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/16 01:40 AM
2

dont think I have ever seen catcalling in real life before. I suppose it is more common/problem in america.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/16 09:20 PM
1

Not 'oh, have I maxed out my appearance in every possible way?' I am more like that I would say, maybe because I am so far away from "maxed" because of my height so my dating pool is beyond reduced, you on the other hand I can imagine still got a decent dating pool despite height if you have other "areas" above average, since height isnt nearly as important for female attractiveness as for male. straight up sucks being short regardless tho. Doesnt get hired because short, dating pool reduced bec…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/16 09:15 PM
1

ahh ok, but doesnt it suck in the sense that most men want a woman that is more around his own height? (studies has found). I am quite surprised how you havent noticed that your height is hindering you a bit in terms of dating. A 5'3 woman isnt "ideal" even for the average man, the average man would ideally want "better". Height on women however isnt that much of a deal breaker for men so I am not sure how much of a hindering it actually is for you specifically, I can assure you however that it …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/16 08:07 PM
1

if you pay for it sure, but thats not really the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 08:10 PM
1

well if tom cruise wasnt famous or rich, he wouldnt even stand a chance, he can have as an attractive face and body as he want, he still wouldnt stand a chance lol....
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 08:08 PM
1

the funny thing is that the neckbeard would get more laid rofl.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 08:07 PM
1

being a short female sucks too, but not nearly as much as it does for men. mainly because as a man height is everything. When it comes to juding womens attractiveness its more of a combination of several factors. I was just saying no girls gonna come running for you just because you are 6'4 or something. This is where I have to respectfully disagree. It isnt like every tall guy is gargoyle ugly face and socially inadept, they are average "people" for the most part, but just taller. being 6'4 alr…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 08:01 PM
1

well the average woman (young, white) is 5'6-5'7 these days and research has found that most women prefer a man to be 5' to 10' taller than her, while men prefer a woman to be around his own height (1-2 inches shorter maybe 3) which basically means that even 6' is "too" short these days unless the woman is actually dead on average height or short. There's a lot of women that's 5'8-5'9, meaning a lot of women would find 6' too short. Whether the man is within a woman 's threshold or not or if she…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 07:46 PM
1

unless he somehow has messed up facial structure or other signifcant deficiencies, yes he will get laid, maybe not instantly like I said, but he will get laid quite effortlessly compared to someone who is 5'11 or below. keep in mind if you're a 5'11 male or under you wont even show up for half the girls on there since they put their filter on 6' and up. (online dating). At 5'11 you atleast got options in real life, but being shorter than that those options quickly go away.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 07:17 PM
1

I completely disagree with you OP, unless you have messed up facial structure or is socially inadept there is no reason for you to not be getting close to instant pussy (at the very least pussy, without trying too hard) unlike your shorter counter-parts. just sign up on online dating, height is pretty fucking important when it comes to getting hookups
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 07:15 PM
1

nothing alone will get you laid I am assuming you're a woman, judging by this comment and also your name. You're delusional. being 6'4, 6'5, 6'6 on online dating gets infinite amounts of instant pussy.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 07:13 PM
1

hookups is only looks, and by that I mean height. what do you think goes through the head of a woman when she think about going out and getting some dick? that's she's gona fook some 5'7-5'8 zac efron looking motherfucker? nah dude not even close, she wanna fuck the biggest guy at the bar/club with the biggest dick. If you are a socially functioning male in this situation personality will not matter. being tall alone outperforms everything when it comes to hookups especially, you're delusional.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 07:07 PM
1

yeah exactly. tall guys get a boost over other talls for being fit and having muscle, average/short guys get absolutely nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/16 07:20 PM
2

Yeah, he is. It goes to show that women don't really care about buffed men I coudlnt agree with you more. this is bascailly 100% truth. Going to the gym will not help you get pussy at all thats factual and I think every guy should know that. Being jacked will help you attract men, not women There is just 1 scenario where being jacked can help you get pussy and that is if you are really tall, because thats actually a good combo and I am pretty sure women find it attractive. Being short or even av…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/16 05:46 PM
1

I coudlnt agree with you more. Height on a man is everything for women, everything else is irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/16 05:37 PM
1

short/average guys can get women, even attractive women, I can 100% agree with you on that, but for different reasons. No. I disagree with you because you think that the reason girls don't look at you is because of your height and that people of average height can't get attention. I'm saying that they can if they're good-looking. You don't get attention because you aren't good-looking, very simple. You're ignoring the fact that you're a balding, average-looking, young guy. That's your problem he…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/16 07:25 PM
1

Most girls are definitely not that tall. At 5'9 you're going to be taller than most girls. A quick google search will tell you that the average height for women is 5'4. a quick google search that includes minorities and women of every age. The AVERAGE height for women in poland is like 5'7 or something? I think they have the tallest women. I think its safe to assume that girls in their twenties are a couple inches taller? I also think its safe to assume that if you remove asian's, blacks etc aka…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/16 07:04 PM
1

ok dude, I feel bad for you if you live in sweden/germany/america or any countries around there, and Im blown away that you havent noticed "anything." maybe being 5'9 isnt as bad as I've thought. It certainly is for online dating tho, thats not even up for debate imo. being 5'9 puts you at an disadvantage not just in dating but also in terms of making friends and being social. Anyway imagine how it would be being even shorter than that, its straight up horrible. Most 20 year old white girls in s…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/16 05:52 PM
1

it has never happened with anyone, maybe in high school/middle school, sure? but out in the real world ? just nope. honestly what do you thnk a women mean when they say they like a man who looks good? In this day and age height is the most attractive trait a man can have, and that by a long shot. I accepted the fact that im heavily disadvantaged despite that im happy about my looks in every other aspect. I'm genuinely curious about your age, something tells me you are either really young or a bi…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/16 03:37 PM
1

in what sense? I have tried everything. The only viable option for short men / short average men is to get a chance to show that you have a lot to offer and that you have a great personality, you have to get to know them basically. Attraction in terms of commited relationships isnt all looks, its probably more to do with personality, but when it comes to hook ups then its almost only looks. being a male of below average height no woman will ever from a distance think to herself "what a good look…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/16 03:32 PM
3

try online dating being less than 6', you wont even show up for half of the girls on there because of filters.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/16 03:09 PM
2

that is the minimum. When the guy is taller than the women, or taller than the women in heels thats the absolute minimum. At that point its socially acceptable for the woman to date you. that doesnt mean its ideal, not even close actually, it just means that you are dateable if you have an insanely good personality and "more to offer". Most women prefer guys that are way taller, and even short girls prefer guys that are 6'0 and up, aka guys that "matchup/surpass" other guys. The height of the fe…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/16 12:41 PM
2

explain why if u put your height at 5'10 hell even 5'11 you wont even show up for half the girls on there due to filters? It might be toxic but it is true. Obviously it depends a bit on where in the world you are so its hard to say whether you are in the minority or not, if you however live in America/western or northern europe, then you are in the minority by far. if you asked any white women in the western world (western/northern europe/america) they would more or less all say that height is a…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/16 12:27 PM
2

you are certainly not pulling because of your looks, but maybe because of other factors that make you more attractive, like for instance a good personality. I hope you realize that most women on online dating these days put their filter on 6'0 up meaning that if you were to be honest and list your height at 5'10 you wouldnt even show up to 50% of the women on there. As we know, women are in demand in online dating and can pretty much pick and choose whoever, even women who are considered below a…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/16 12:25 PM
5

looks matter to women, aka height. thats the main thing, and its almost the only thing as well actually. above average height, or significantly above average with everything else average will put you at an insane advantage. having a nice face or nice physique with average or below average height doesnt get you anywhere. You can legit look like zac efron or whoever and have the best ideal face and physique, but if you're 5'5, 5'8 or maybe even 5'10 you will still be nothing in real life dating. w…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/16 08:55 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter