TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

yehudia Archive

View 0 posts and 72 comments by yehudia on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

In the US, more men want to have kids than women. You shouldn't have a problem. https://www.thecut.com/2015/03/when-men-want-kids-and-women-arent-so-sure.html The online survey of singles ages 21 and older was conducted by market research firm MarketTools for the Dallas-based dating website Match.com. Fisher, a research professor at Rutgers University, is a scientific adviser for a division of Match.com. Data show men are quicker to fall in love and more likely than women to want children: 54% o…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/17 02:08 AM
1

Every time someone says engineers get paid more than six figures I laugh.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/17 09:51 PM
1

Can't fund yourself when the economy collapses because no kids are born. Labor is much more then the brainless lifting of objects in between Reddit ranting. Of course women work harder than you.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/17 08:21 PM
1

Women? Maybe.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/17 04:54 PM
4

Says the guy who never raised children and has no idea what his parents went through. your life depends on women having children. You die without them making that personal choice. If they're not adequately compensated, you're mooching off of them. Just because it's historically unpaid doesn't mean it's not work, not valuable, and doesn't deserve compensation. Amazing how entitled people are about women having kids. Bemoaning birth rates because they know they're dead without the next generation …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/17 04:36 PM
3

Cool. I'd expect that. In Europe they don't penalize women for having children. In US, the trend is shifting. And that's what you'd expect if you punish women for having kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/17 04:12 PM
5

Please. They do the bulk of the unpaid child rearing and care of elderly and disabled. you need kids to ensure your retirement savings actually mean something, to produce food so you don't die, energy so you don't die, to become healthcare workers to change your diaper. But you want women to do all that for free? Even worse, you want to penalize them for doing so? That's mooching big time.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/17 03:44 PM
3

Looks like you're in a bubble. Different from the rest of the country.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/17 03:16 PM
5

I guess we are going to have to do this again. Dismissing what you don't like? About 8 in 10 fathers surveyed said they always knew they wanted to have children, compared with about 7 in 10 mothers, and 69 percent of dads called that long-standing desire to have children an important factor in their decision to have kids. And that's in addition to what you cite. Don't like it? So you dismiss it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/17 02:35 PM
3

You must be in a bubble. Some of my friends have children, some have no interest in it and are happy just being married. I have no idea why you're having such trouble.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/17 02:20 PM
2

yes, you're using skewed sources (if you have any sources at all). Sorry, the data doesn't support what you're saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/17 02:17 PM
3

I highly doubt that your job involves more labor than most women will ever do. You've got plenty of time to obsess over women and post about them constantly on the internet. You can't fund yourself, you need the next generation to keep the economy going. Looks like you're okay with mooching off of others.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/17 02:12 PM
1

Then give women an incentive to do it instead of penalizing them while you mooch off their labor. Start with mandatory paid maternity leave.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/17 12:42 PM
6

More men than women want kids now. https://www.thecut.com/2015/03/when-men-want-kids-and-women-arent-so-sure.html Looks like men will have to convince women to have kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/17 12:25 PM
1

That's right. It stayed steady among the unpartnered. So how are n counts increasing? We already know that people don't rack up a large amount of partners I've read their lifetime. So I'll go back to my original sarcastic comment. About women sleeping with Chad all the time despite all these stats that say the opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/17 10:56 AM
1

I did. And that's why I said you're doing mental gymnastics.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/17 10:46 AM
2

Because parenting is much more than a few after school activities. You'd be better off asking actual parents, than a bunch of teenagers and twenty somethings having a tough time with life, angry at the world, and completely oblivious to what their parents went through (or are still going through).
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/17 10:21 AM
1

Yeah, it does. That's an amazing amount of mental gymnastics you're doing to go around it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/17 10:15 AM
1

99% of the RP advice on parenting here boils down to what activities should be chosen for the kid. No parents here obviously.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/17 02:41 AM
1

Course not. ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/17 11:15 PM
3

Woot!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/17 02:57 PM
2

Everything is voluntary. That doesn't disprove anything I said, or make OPs question less ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/17 02:47 PM
5

I'm surprised you did any math at all considering you've got a uterus.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/17 02:03 PM
7

What? You haven't had sex with at least 10 guys? Obv you're lying.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/17 01:13 PM
3

My husband became my best friend. He is the person I am closest to in the world, and vice versa. better than a best friend actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/17 01:12 PM
2

To be on the same wavelength as me. Not ugly.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/17 11:39 AM
1

Who cares about flair matching?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/17 11:34 AM
8

I thought women were all having lots of sex with Chad and racking up their n counts despite all these surveys that say the exact opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/17 11:30 AM
1

So what's your excuse for the other bloopers that are calling this a strawman? Do we all live in religiously conservative communities? If you tempered your statements they'd sound more realistic, but you've made them absolutist and created a strawman by doing so.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/17 11:26 AM
1

Looks like a strawman to me. I'm certainly not defending that behavior. You haven't made your OP realistic enough for anyone to take it seriously, so perhaps you should modify it. So far, no one thinks it's worth defending. So what debate were you hoping to have if we can all agree that the description is unrealistic?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/17 11:18 AM
3

Okie dokie. Carry on.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/17 10:33 AM
4

Look dude. I don't know why you're having so much difficulty with this. The stats don't lie. Women are worse off than men after divorce and we all know why, it's pretty black and white. They'd be better off financially if they never would have married. If you're talking about financial hardship then it would be a more pressing question for women, not men. So why would women get married if not for love? Why would anyone? Like I said, your question doesn't make any sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/17 10:24 AM
2

Your OP is a collection of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/17 10:01 AM
2

A census is cherry picked garbage? K. Your third source even agrees with me- they stare that the wife's standard of living decreases after divorce and is far less than the man's. Your first article explains that women get child dupport more often. Correct. The sources I brought discuss this. The woman generally gets it because she was the primary caregiver and was not working full time. Even if she was working full time she was still doing the bulk of child care and sacrificed her career for it.…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/17 10:00 AM
1

I was going to bring gasoline for that strawman, but I like the idea of a samurai better.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/17 09:46 AM
4

No they don't. Have you seen the stats of divorced moms vs divorced dads? If finances are the only consideration, Women are better off not getting married. https://nationalparentsorganization.org/blog/18807-census-bureau-mothe https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2009/jan/25/divorce-women-research
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/17 09:38 AM
2

Why would anyone, man or woman, want to marry if not for love? It doesn't make sense for either gender unless you're trying to get a green card or something. This question makes no sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/17 09:19 AM
1

Nope. He's an entitled douche. Everyone is contributing. The women don't owe him sex. He can go cry in a corner. So sad indeed. I bet the other three withhold their indispensable skills from him the next time he needs them, cause he's an entitled douche.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/17 10:29 PM
1

yup. Sex isn't a necessity. Healthcare is.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/17 10:21 PM
3

An insignificant minority of reactionaries, but yeah. The young age certainly accounts for the quality of comments they post. Sexism is more prevalent with older generations as the age gets younger.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/17 09:31 PM
4

Not men. Terpers.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/17 08:39 PM
1

It's a troll
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/17 05:53 PM
0

You should try actually talking with feminists.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 11:49 AM
1

Maybe it's your family. That definitely doesn't happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 03:24 AM
2

Nah. There's no nesssge. Terpers and MRAs made it up. They went from pedastalizing women to hating them. Neither outlook is based on healthy interactions with women, based on the very basic knowledge that they're human like everyone else. because terpers have such difficulty understanding their surroundings They're unable to understand why they think the things they do. It's only terpers with this problem really.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 12:22 AM
3

Especially if left untreated. And mental illness isn't thought of with the same seriousness as physical illnesses.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/17 06:28 AM
5

Being fucked up goes hand in hand with Hating an entire gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/17 06:25 AM
3

Wash and Zoe.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/17 06:14 AM
2

I think what you saw is confirmation bias and not having enough healthy interactions with women to understand the context of whatever messaging you think you saw. It simply doesn't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/17 05:59 AM
6

So you should be more understanding of political lesbians because they've had terrible experiences with men in the past and therefore any hatred they may hold is justified and understandable. Are you willing to be that forgiving of extreme feminists or is it only terpers you think deserve empathy?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/17 05:54 AM
1

I don't see that message being conveyed anywhere, not explicitly and not implicitly. What I do see among terpers, contrary to everyone else, is that they have developed unrealistic and unhealthy ideas about women either through little interaction or poor interactions. And so they have trouble regarding women as human beings. They also have a problem with confirmation bias. The red pill just exacerbates the problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/17 05:45 AM
3

I would label all that as poor interactions/poor experiences. And again, not understanding that women, like men, are human.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/17 01:16 AM
1

Never seen someone change their position so quickly. Cool.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/17 12:32 AM
1

A source about how well someone invests is irrelevant to a discussion about morality and ethics. You brought the source. https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/6ccfd9/do_you_believe_that_women_as_a_whole_are/dhtta2v/
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/17 12:30 AM
1

I don't know what your rationale is for bringing irrelevant sources, only you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/17 12:22 AM
1

no no no There have been bad articles that made it through the peer review process in physics, biology and other fields. Are you going to make the same statements about physics and biology?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/17 12:21 AM
2

You didn't. You created a discussion about the supposed better morality of women and brought a source that has nothing to do with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/17 12:14 AM
2

Nope. Society never told me. My theory is that MRAs and terpers simply have unhealthy views on women based on poor interactions with them or little interactions with them. So they have trouble seeing women as human, for better or for worse What does investing have to do with morality and niceness? If you'd like to bring a source, that's fine. But it would help if you bring one that's relevant to the point you're trying to make.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/17 12:07 AM
2

Wut? No. The first time I've heard the concept that women are better is terpers and MRAs discussing how society has misled them into thinking that. Somehow, society never told me that women were better but whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/17 11:55 PM
3

Sounds like you're scared of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/17 03:19 AM
5

I've literally set up my exes with other people. They were good men. We parted on civil terms. Why not? I want them to be happy, even if it's not with me.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/17 08:58 PM
1

Typical cracked article. But no, it doesn't surprise me. Gendered norms are fake.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/17 06:18 PM
1

Too much money to make an impact. But assuming it's affordable- women everywhere celebrate!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/17 06:10 PM
0

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=zIhKAQX5izw
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/17 01:13 PM
1

The internet makes us privy to what people don't say in IRL. If you hang out with guys that are interested in the same topics as you, and you're all following the non-phenomena of false rape accusations, then you'll all be worried about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 10:00 PM
2

Right. Involved in gender politics. A high interest in false rape accusations. I'm sure you and your friends are worried.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 09:54 PM
3

Of course there are some. They are a small minority.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 09:47 PM
5

Except there's no evidence to support that fear. It's produced by a fixation on something that doesn't really happen that often. There's no reason to be afraid of a false rape accusation any more than there's reason to be afraid of a false accusation of any other crime. I know it's difficult to take a step back and look at it soberly. I've had discussions with parents about the irrational fear of kidnapping by strangers and why there is no reason to not let their kids roam around without supervi…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 09:44 PM
2

Sure it is. Men are just as diverse as women. They're human. If you knew how most men think about everything you'd be rich and not wasting your time on Reddit. :) People don't obsess over being falsely accused of a crime, much less a specific crime. The beauty of the internet is that people talk about things they wouldn't normally talk about IRL. And we can all read it and learn. So, based on this access to what people think what is the conclusion? Who is afraid of being falsely accused of rape?…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 09:26 PM
1

A single man wouldn't know what most guys think either. Being a man doesn't make one privy to how most guys think. However, the topic has come up in the past. People involved in gender wars debates on the internet are a small minority of people, and of those, only some are obsessed with false rape accusations to the extent that they actively begin to fear it happening to them. People generally don't fear getting falsely accused of a crime. There's no reason to fear being falsely accused of a spe…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 08:58 PM
5

No. Most guys aren't afraid of being accused of rape. The internet distorts reality if the topic is obsessed over.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 08:43 PM
11

She gave a great example which disproves your point. Another example is bill Cosby- that took over a decade before the accusations were taken seriously. Casey affelek seems to be doing fine. Woody Allen had a long successful career. Sean penn is doing fine. Does this happen all the time? Of course not. It depends on the case. But I don't understand how you can claim that accusations de facto ruin a man's life when there are so many instances to the contrary. However, coming forward as a victim o…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 07:48 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter