TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

yendorion Archive

View 0 posts and 63 comments by yendorion on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Only if you're married to Incontinentia Buttocks
/r/MensRights21/09/23 03:40 AM
2

Well I beg to differ! I hang on to my dadbod because it's positively beautiful!
/r/MensRights29/10/22 10:36 AM
2

Who cares about their age as long as they're consenting adults?
/r/MensRights20/10/22 02:15 PM
2

Depending on the expected payment...
/r/MensRights19/10/22 04:51 AM
7

There was an economic incentive with endorsing the #metoo movement.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 11:32 AM
3

Caveat, unless you're a single dad.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 10:18 AM
1

That not what it means, cuck has a more specific meaning, knowingly going in a relationship where your partner has children & especially if they're supported by their father doesn't make one a cuck. There may be reasons like having kids of your own & wanting to give them a mother figure, you'd want someone with experience.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 10:12 AM
0

That era is over, only women choose men now.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 11:01 PM
8

You should grow a pair & learn to hold your tongue before blathering stupidities. As an adult he can do what the fuck he wants.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 06:17 PM
2

You are both in different senses, by 'typically' google is stating that it tends to happen more to women, in a sense that is not only a wrong thing to state but also irrelevant because every individual is affected the same by such discrimination & should be given the same attention absolutely but on the other hand google goes on to clarify by it's linguistic example that what it's saying is that sexism is not always & usually not intentional just a cultural bias coming from the days of (actual) …
/r/MensRights08/08/18 06:23 AM
5

WoW, word!
/r/MensRights06/08/18 08:02 AM
0

They know, and they think better of them for that. Now of course I do not advocate such authority, I'm actually very egaliterian, equal say across the board but I can't help but constantly notice it & I admit it's infuriating.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 07:40 AM
2

He indeed does but he's not, a crazy person can't help it.. this one seems more intentionally ignorant.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 01:39 AM
8

Interesting point, I've always found Dr.Peterson very coherent reasonable & incredibly witty (albeit I don't find myself always in agreement), that is until he touches on the topic of God... I don't know what it is but it's like he trips & can't compute properly each time he's question about it. Disappointing really given his status, I shall watch your link in full /u/Anne_Danke thanks.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 01:36 AM
1

Until the precedents start landing what I would suggest is that almost immediately before having sex, take a nice photo with your so, just a minute thing with a big smile confirming EACHOTHER's consent... just that. If she's willing & happy to be with you, aware, she'll be understanding & get it over with, if not... get be nice about it & start taking the exit route for the night, hopefully for the net time round.. but until so.. GYOW It's not foolproof but it'll make any possible accusation way…
/r/askTRP24/05/18 10:16 PM
1

In other worse everyone residing in Sweden will be declared a rapist short of a rubberstamp trial.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 04:36 PM
1

As I'm pleased to see others comment on, it's your points of departure that a very flawed through misunderstanding. Although I'm not able to expand further at the moment, I trust you could reap lessons from the rest of the comments here.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/18 04:42 PM
1

No I don't see a problem with them publishing anything, far from it in fact, but at the point that publishers excluded from every possible liability for carrying the responsibility to accept publishing on their platform, if for anything the point that they have to juggle consequential perceptions despite that they might expressly declare such disassociation from the views presented, as many justly do in fact. This can be seen on how & if they seek out to have a balance of contrasting views publi…
/r/MensRights03/05/18 03:58 AM
1

Such liability doesn't have solely to take the form of taking responsibility for the writings themselves but simply for associative responsibility that comes with it & surely enough you make a good case if such a line for that at all. Well there is an argument that can be made in terms of where substantive rights are concerned, with a lower non-legal bar of course.. in a nutshell we can name it all under the cap of offensive speech which in turn it should not only be upheld as part of the right …
/r/MensRights03/05/18 02:30 AM
1

Still it bring into question how much of extreme opinion is allowable before it makes the platform partly liable for allowing it on. Thus defintely crosses that line.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 11:52 PM
2

You can have as much commitment & trust without the need to sign your soul away, no difference otherwise except you hold on to control, if you're still into that kind of jam, have a non-legally binding but just as emotional ritual of your choice, fems also dig more that exotic kind of thing.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/18 01:30 PM
8

It's in singular, this is comparing to say an ISIL fighter preaching his version of islam, his words make him a radical extremist & the same goes here with the article. I get you dislike generalizations & perfectly agree with you but the article dispelles that & leave it to the mainstream to be enticed to sideline auch extreme rhetoric rather than sweeping it under the carpet, this helps not harms the movement in the longer run.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 02:06 AM
2

how about getting VICE to call all male staff to get penetrated & write an article about how it felt for each? Then we'll take it from there.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 10:10 AM
1

I am not blaming it on anything but if you did the same argument could works as much for the counter argument but I'll digress, back up a second & read again what Lena Dunham said. Even if it were 1 in 10 would be enough to undo her statement, the rest only strengthens how wrong she is. It's not about proportions or probability but how there is no group that doesn't know what being under attack means.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 10:29 PM
1

Which is all it takes.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 09:13 PM
8

No but white men are part of them military? Way more often on the front lines under attack than any other group you care to include?
/r/MensRights14/05/17 02:50 PM
1

The only true backfire is less & less men opting for marriage seeing all the pitfalls, this is simply a case of equality being applied correctly.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 12:13 AM
1

While the study seems overall sound, these are indicative highly simplistic (stay with me) studies not definitive. The suggestion that playing video games necessitates an underlying problem is incorrect and labeling an addition is not exactly on the mark, rather than a habitual consequence of a currently state of life which while it may seem semantics, it's significantly different. While OP gives consideration in highlighting some "benefits" of gaming but the pros & cons of such a statement as p…
/r/TheRedPill25/02/17 01:35 AM
1

no actually remember to do it - repost
/r/MensRights18/12/16 01:30 AM
1

The expensive dogs are the one's not inbred, those sold as expensive dogs usually tend to be unfortunately. Just spent an arm & a leg on my second because of her pedigree/bloodline quality. P.S . OP is absolutely right but they require absolute dedication if not, you're a shithead for getting one.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/16 02:07 AM
1

The necessary benefits of self-cultivation shouldn't be underestimated, reading, gaming are very important. As far as you can, be decently familiar at everything might be capable at, from culture to cooking. Most may not into play in many situations, in others it may make or break an opportunity. Self-dependency is key & a visible virtue.
/r/TheRedPill19/09/16 06:13 AM
2

Exactly, that's the problem with your post. You post basically suggest one to sacrifice self-cultivation time for a full time obsession. Sounds edgy but this gets nobody anywhere.
/r/TheRedPill19/09/16 05:02 AM
-1

Fuck you have no idea what you talking about dog. What are you on?
/r/TheRedPill26/06/16 09:33 AM
-1

I'm one who grew up & still preach this mantra. It's infuriating to look around & see we have actually regressed rather in such matters.
/r/TheRedPill26/06/16 07:58 AM
5

You cannot state that for whole Europe, the subject of nudity is actually a very delicate to taboo issue in most of southern/eastern Europe even more than the US. It's even starting to come in question in otherwise more 'liberated' parts of Europe. Source: I'm southern European.
/r/TheRedPill26/06/16 07:46 AM
9

Ha! As if gold digging gay people don't exist.... they do.
/r/PussyPass15/06/16 01:52 AM
2

Religion is the one thing Putin upholds more than women clearly.
/r/PussyPass18/05/16 03:30 PM
12

As a woman? Don't be.
/r/PussyPass18/05/16 11:31 AM
6

What a rather typical story... but I wish to throw my two pence on a wrong message which is being risked to be sent out there. It's not that there anything wrong or bad with knowing how to do housework & actually doing it per se but what is being conveyed but doing or helping out with housework. In this case what I can guess his grandparents made fun of him because he came across as trained mule on a leash to relieve her excessively at her leisure rather than to handle things up his own as an in…
/r/TheRedPill14/04/16 04:24 AM
1

Doesn't that become sisterizing in this case?
/r/MensRights13/09/15 12:52 PM
1

The title would have had me fooled (sorry it's not a good title or at least not complete) but there content is really well put & articulated very fairly. I very much agree.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/15 01:08 PM
12

I'll keep picturing them as asexual, fuck sexism.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 02:27 AM
1

The Adblock "acceptable ads" is a controversial measure in itself, basically they ransom money from companies to be allowed through which is money Reddit pays. A callous business measure if you ask me but ublock doesn't have the same AFAIK. http://www.themediabriefing.com/article/adblock-plus-google-microsoft-taboola-controversy
/r/MensRights11/06/15 11:48 AM
1

Probably but I cannot be sure, only use ublock origin (saves RAM). The usage of multiple adblockers is usually not recommended & I don't think it's neccessary. https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/ublock-origin/cjpalhdlnbpafiamejdnhcphjbkeiagm
/r/MensRights11/06/15 11:14 AM
3

Adblock plus whitelists Reddit by default as part of it's acceptable ads initiative. https://adblockplus.org/acceptable-ads#optout
/r/MensRights11/06/15 10:04 AM
4

Neither I for that matter.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 01:03 PM
32

She basically made a porn & uploaded it.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 05:38 AM
1

The guy should have been arrested for obstruction. If anything he should have stuck to filming.
/r/PussyPass13/04/15 07:20 PM
2

At least the reply to her letter did put the onus on her.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 07:06 PM
1

That kind of honesty I can appreciate.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 12:14 PM
1

The dailymail... 'nuff said.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 11:51 AM
1

Perhaps but the number of allegations don't make them more true, so really likelyhood is not relevant here, it's any kind of proof to back up the claims which is. Don't get me wrong it may have happened & it sucks if they can't proof their case, but it equally suck if he got condemned on allegations which could have had ulterior motives.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 06:48 AM
1

Don't write a word about it, sit, wait & report when feminists will rise up to ask about it.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 07:52 PM
3

Geez, The Verge is quiet skilled at digging it's own grave, Never seen so many lies compressed in one article, they're almost as good as 7-zip.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 10:05 AM
0

There's an ocean of difference from discriminatory parking spaces which are part of the road space drivers pay for to gender catered classes. In Europe at least female not only parkings are illegal but would be challenged in a heartbeat.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 08:25 AM
5

Yes I have some problems with it too for how it will be interpreted by the radfems but in context her message is very sound & this should be encouraged.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 06:24 PM
0

Understandably :)
/r/MensRights21/09/14 08:03 PM
2

Understandably perhaps but it's no excuse.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 06:33 PM
1

First of all by blowing it up like that on a public forum, secondly one can sum a character from the way they write, of course what they write doesn't make them everything they are thus we cannot judge in those terms absolutely but it feels there problems started much prior to the events she wrote about, at least from the way I see it.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 06:24 PM
4

In fairness he started by cheating on her, ironically she let on the reasons why he could have done that seeing how she is on Reddit, yet wrong doesn't fix wrong.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 02:33 PM
1

"Chivalry is dead, and women killed it" Dave Chapelle
/r/MensRights29/08/14 04:30 PM
4

"Chivalry is dead, and women killed it" Dave Chapelle
/r/MensRights29/08/14 04:30 PM
2

Same happened to me on /r/feminism, I didn't make much of it except update my last entry (which wasn't deleted ironically).. the subreddit is obviously run by radical feminists with an inferiority complex which even if you're on their side but happen to be slightly moderate than they are (since I happen to be male, ugh dastardly isn't it?), you get the chopped off.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 01:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter