~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Justin Trudeau has been promoted!WTF is a wage slave? | /r/MensRights | 08/02/18 03:21 AM |
| 8 | The island where men are BANNED: 'Ultra-luxe' retreat to open off of Finland where only women can stayWonder who does all the hard work to keep things running? | /r/MensRights | 07/02/18 06:41 PM |
| 2 | Trudeau under fire for saying some vets want more than government can afford. BUT Trudeau announces $650 million for reproductive health and abortions worldwide. Some governments have different priorities.He likes Canadian citizen terrorists from Gitmo too! | /r/MensRights | 06/02/18 07:59 PM |
| 1 | Thought of the day: “Mankind” is discriminatory because it isn’t gender neutral, but “feminism” represents equality for both genders?Me, it’s a question | /r/MensRights | 06/02/18 07:48 PM |
| 1 | Trudeau corrects woman, it’s not “mankind” it’s “PEOPLEKIND”The world’s most powerful pussy right there! Every time I hear him speak I get ill. | /r/MensRights | 06/02/18 03:50 AM |
| 6 | Judge recommends university pay $850,000 to student it punished after exonerating him of rape claimsRecommends? What kind of judge is that? | /r/MensRights | 06/02/18 03:40 AM |
| 3 | Thought of the day: “Mankind” is discriminatory because it isn’t gender neutral, but “feminism” represents equality for both genders?Fair enough. Your posts sounded as though you’ve already made up your mind. The larger issue, in my mind, is the FISA warrant process and how (apparently) easy they are to get. Both R’s and D’s voted recently to reauthorize the use of these secret courts. I find that more troubling than anything Trump has done to impede the investigation. I would do the same if under scrutiny from a federal prosecutor, as I’m sure you would. | /r/MensRights | 05/02/18 05:39 PM |
| 17 | My wife cheated on me and I am worried about my son.In some states, adultery is sufficient grounds to bar her from receiving alimony. You will pay c/s until (at least) your son is 18, if she gets custody. My advice: do it now rather than later. The longer you stay, the more you’ll pay. She is a cheater and always will be. Look for a father-friendly attorney in your area. Look up “Cordell and Cordell” online and see if they have people in your state. Don’t do anything your wife says, do only what your lawyer recommends. Do not destroy evidence. Ge… | /r/MensRights | 05/02/18 05:32 PM |
| 4 | Another terribad T-Mobile add in the superbowlYep, I turned the channel when I saw that one | /r/MensRights | 05/02/18 05:14 PM |
| 3 | Thought of the day: “Mankind” is discriminatory because it isn’t gender neutral, but “feminism” represents equality for both genders?If you are innocent and have nothing to hide, why don’t you just let us search your person and property? Sounds like something a crooked cop might say... | /r/MensRights | 05/02/18 05:11 PM |
| 0 | Thought of the day: “Mankind” is discriminatory because it isn’t gender neutral, but “feminism” represents equality for both genders?“Presumption of innocence” equals “shielded from skepticism”? | /r/MensRights | 05/02/18 05:08 PM |
| 3 | Thought of the day: “Mankind” is discriminatory because it isn’t gender neutral, but “feminism” represents equality for both genders?Next up: the word “woman” is sexist because it contains “man” They don’t seem to understand that “mankind” is synonymous with “humankind” | /r/MensRights | 05/02/18 05:03 PM |
| -4 | Thought of the day: “Mankind” is discriminatory because it isn’t gender neutral, but “feminism” represents equality for both genders?Does he (the pres) not deserve the same presumption of innocence we all screech about in this sub constantly? | /r/MensRights | 05/02/18 04:56 PM |
| 1 | Google Manager to Employees: "Next time you get invited to speak at a conference, especially if you’re a white male – ask the organizer to confirm you’re the only white male on the panel / in the speaker lineup. If not, say you are honored, but must decline, and give the reason."You still don’t understand what “false dichotomy” means. You really should try to before you use the term. I didn’t say politicians don’t influence, I said they arrogantly believe they can predict the effects of their policies. They cannot. Honestly, I have no interest in arguing with an ideologue, so enjoy the superbowl and drink a beer and for fuck’s sake RELAX...there are always going to be R’s and D’s, but you don’t have to hate one side just because you disagree. You’ll have a miserable and… | /r/MensRights | 05/02/18 12:04 AM |
| 1 | Google Manager to Employees: "Next time you get invited to speak at a conference, especially if you’re a white male – ask the organizer to confirm you’re the only white male on the panel / in the speaker lineup. If not, say you are honored, but must decline, and give the reason."In my adult lifetime, which goes back to the 2nd Reagan term, the truly catastrophic ideas have generally been bipartisan. The world is very complex and only politicians are arrogant enough to think they can control outcomes. | /r/MensRights | 04/02/18 10:59 PM |
| 1 | Google Manager to Employees: "Next time you get invited to speak at a conference, especially if you’re a white male – ask the organizer to confirm you’re the only white male on the panel / in the speaker lineup. If not, say you are honored, but must decline, and give the reason."No, I’m saying that trying to blame very complicated events and outcomes on political affiliation is just silly. There’s a lot more to it than D or R. | /r/MensRights | 04/02/18 10:16 PM |
| 1 | Google Manager to Employees: "Next time you get invited to speak at a conference, especially if you’re a white male – ask the organizer to confirm you’re the only white male on the panel / in the speaker lineup. If not, say you are honored, but must decline, and give the reason."It’s not worth it dude...it’s not capable | /r/MensRights | 04/02/18 10:06 PM |
| 3 | Google Manager to Employees: "Next time you get invited to speak at a conference, especially if you’re a white male – ask the organizer to confirm you’re the only white male on the panel / in the speaker lineup. If not, say you are honored, but must decline, and give the reason."https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/12/22/cbs_how_will_tax_cuts_affect_your_family.html#! | /r/MensRights | 04/02/18 09:57 PM |
| 1 | Google Manager to Employees: "Next time you get invited to speak at a conference, especially if you’re a white male – ask the organizer to confirm you’re the only white male on the panel / in the speaker lineup. If not, say you are honored, but must decline, and give the reason."Except when it is | /r/MensRights | 04/02/18 09:42 PM |
| 1 | Google Manager to Employees: "Next time you get invited to speak at a conference, especially if you’re a white male – ask the organizer to confirm you’re the only white male on the panel / in the speaker lineup. If not, say you are honored, but must decline, and give the reason."Uh, no...a false dichotomy fallacy is presenting only 2 choices as either/or, while ignoring other possibilities. | /r/MensRights | 04/02/18 09:32 PM |
| 1 | Google Manager to Employees: "Next time you get invited to speak at a conference, especially if you’re a white male – ask the organizer to confirm you’re the only white male on the panel / in the speaker lineup. If not, say you are honored, but must decline, and give the reason."Libertarian leanings (I would say classic liberal). With regard to the article you linked... the author implies, by use of the words “has led to,” a causal effect between Republican policies and financial disaster, while providing no argument addressing those policies, or how they “led to” disaster. This is the classic “correlation vs causation” fallacy. -Cheap and easy housing loans led to the ‘08 crisis, but the policies that got us those loans were pushed by both D’s and R’s. Democrats insist… | /r/MensRights | 04/02/18 08:57 PM |
| 0 | Google Manager to Employees: "Next time you get invited to speak at a conference, especially if you’re a white male – ask the organizer to confirm you’re the only white male on the panel / in the speaker lineup. If not, say you are honored, but must decline, and give the reason."Currently Dems 2:1 advantage in registered voters Dems 7:1 advantage in congressional representation Prior to 2011 gerrymandering Dems 2:1 advantage in registered voters Dems 3:1 advantage in congressional representation And this “more accurately represents Maryland”? Lol The D’s gerrymandered their districts to go from a 6:2 advantage to a 7:1 advantage, even though 6:2 was already disproportionately in their favor. These are the facts, yet you defend it as justifiable because “simplicity” or “… | /r/MensRights | 04/02/18 08:14 PM |
| 1 | Google Manager to Employees: "Next time you get invited to speak at a conference, especially if you’re a white male – ask the organizer to confirm you’re the only white male on the panel / in the speaker lineup. If not, say you are honored, but must decline, and give the reason."No, I’m asking you a question (see above) | /r/MensRights | 04/02/18 07:36 PM |
| 1 | Google Manager to Employees: "Next time you get invited to speak at a conference, especially if you’re a white male – ask the organizer to confirm you’re the only white male on the panel / in the speaker lineup. If not, say you are honored, but must decline, and give the reason."Why do you think the lines were redrawn in 2011, resulting in in district 6 going from 55% R to 35% R, and the R’s losing a seat that had been held for over 2 decades? Prior to that redrawing, R’s had consistently held more than 1 seat. Since then, only 1. Simplicity — no To benefit R’s — no To benefit D’s — ? Other - __ | /r/MensRights | 04/02/18 07:26 PM |
| 1 | Google Manager to Employees: "Next time you get invited to speak at a conference, especially if you’re a white male – ask the organizer to confirm you’re the only white male on the panel / in the speaker lineup. If not, say you are honored, but must decline, and give the reason."1953 Recession followed Truman (D) 1957 and 1960 Recessions followed Eisenhower (R) ‘70, ‘73-‘75 - followed Johnson (D) but Nixon (R) was in office by ‘69 ‘80-‘82 followed Carter (D) ‘90-‘91 followed Reagan (R) 2001 followed Clinton (D) 2008 followed Bush Recessions are natural events in our economy, and no political party is more or less responsible for them. Depressions are rare, and causes are very complicated. Politics is not one of them. If I think taxes should be lower, am I deplorable? If… | /r/MensRights | 04/02/18 07:18 PM |
| 1 | Google Manager to Employees: "Next time you get invited to speak at a conference, especially if you’re a white male – ask the organizer to confirm you’re the only white male on the panel / in the speaker lineup. If not, say you are honored, but must decline, and give the reason."You are saying that “simplicity” is the reason the lines are drawn as they are...are you not? If not, why are they drawn this way? | /r/MensRights | 04/02/18 06:20 PM |
| 3 | Google Manager to Employees: "Next time you get invited to speak at a conference, especially if you’re a white male – ask the organizer to confirm you’re the only white male on the panel / in the speaker lineup. If not, say you are honored, but must decline, and give the reason."Such as? | /r/MensRights | 04/02/18 06:14 PM |
| 4 | Google Manager to Employees: "Next time you get invited to speak at a conference, especially if you’re a white male – ask the organizer to confirm you’re the only white male on the panel / in the speaker lineup. If not, say you are honored, but must decline, and give the reason."Maryland had MORE Republican congressional districts BEFORE the gerrymandering occurred. The guy in district 6 had won his 10 previous elections. In 2012, after gerrymandering, he lost. District 6 was redrawn to make R’s a minority. Since the redrawing, R’s have not won more than 1 district. For you to claim the dems redrew the lines to benefit R’s is laughable. | /r/MensRights | 04/02/18 06:13 PM |
| 0 | Google Manager to Employees: "Next time you get invited to speak at a conference, especially if you’re a white male – ask the organizer to confirm you’re the only white male on the panel / in the speaker lineup. If not, say you are honored, but must decline, and give the reason."So now you are claiming the dems redrew the lines to make them “simpler”? Surely you jest! | /r/MensRights | 04/02/18 06:09 PM |
| 0 | Google Manager to Employees: "Next time you get invited to speak at a conference, especially if you’re a white male – ask the organizer to confirm you’re the only white male on the panel / in the speaker lineup. If not, say you are honored, but must decline, and give the reason."I’m not claiming anything. I’m asking you, very specifically, HOW gerrymandering enables voter suppression in presidential elections, as you claim. | /r/MensRights | 04/02/18 06:06 PM |
| 7 | Google Manager to Employees: "Next time you get invited to speak at a conference, especially if you’re a white male – ask the organizer to confirm you’re the only white male on the panel / in the speaker lineup. If not, say you are honored, but must decline, and give the reason."Depends on your perspective I suppose. The Maryland gerrymandering (by democrats) case is at the Supreme Court, along with the Wisconsin (by R’s) case. | /r/MensRights | 04/02/18 06:04 PM |
| -1 | Google Manager to Employees: "Next time you get invited to speak at a conference, especially if you’re a white male – ask the organizer to confirm you’re the only white male on the panel / in the speaker lineup. If not, say you are honored, but must decline, and give the reason."How much more simple could it be, than going back to previously established districts? | /r/MensRights | 04/02/18 05:57 PM |
| 0 | Google Manager to Employees: "Next time you get invited to speak at a conference, especially if you’re a white male – ask the organizer to confirm you’re the only white male on the panel / in the speaker lineup. If not, say you are honored, but must decline, and give the reason."Sounds fair to me. Unfortunately, the Congressional Black Caucus and possibly the US Supreme court would disagree. “Majority Minority” districts would be decimated, resulting in fewer minority representatives. | /r/MensRights | 04/02/18 05:56 PM |
| -1 | Google Manager to Employees: "Next time you get invited to speak at a conference, especially if you’re a white male – ask the organizer to confirm you’re the only white male on the panel / in the speaker lineup. If not, say you are honored, but must decline, and give the reason."Republican Roscoe Bartlett won the 6th district in the previous 10 congressional elections but was defeated in 2012 by a Dem, after gerrymandering reduced republican voters in the district to a minority, from a previous solid majority. R’s controlled more than one congressional district prior to the 2010 gerrymandering. Now they have 1, and your argument is that “there is no other way”? Also, the redrawing was so egregious that the USSC has agreed to hear the case. Honestly, I don’t see how anyo… | /r/MensRights | 04/02/18 05:30 PM |
| 7 | Google Manager to Employees: "Next time you get invited to speak at a conference, especially if you’re a white male – ask the organizer to confirm you’re the only white male on the panel / in the speaker lineup. If not, say you are honored, but must decline, and give the reason."I’m just going to assume that you mis-spoke about gerrymandering as an enabler of voter suppression in presidential elections, since you still have not even attempted an explanation. And yea, Maryland gerrymandering is just as bad as NC. In fact, it’s going to the US Supreme Court too. Enjoy your Sunday. | /r/MensRights | 04/02/18 04:58 PM |
| 1 | Google Manager to Employees: "Next time you get invited to speak at a conference, especially if you’re a white male – ask the organizer to confirm you’re the only white male on the panel / in the speaker lineup. If not, say you are honored, but must decline, and give the reason."I understand what you wrote. The entire purpose of gerrymandering is to do just what was done in Maryland. It puts a large number of Republican voters in a single district, thereby securing the other districts and a permanent majority for democrats. This is not in any way a “benefit” to Republicans. You aren’t so naive to think the dems drew district lines to help out the repubs are you? | /r/MensRights | 04/02/18 04:50 PM |
| 4 | Google Manager to Employees: "Next time you get invited to speak at a conference, especially if you’re a white male – ask the organizer to confirm you’re the only white male on the panel / in the speaker lineup. If not, say you are honored, but must decline, and give the reason."Classic strawman | /r/MensRights | 04/02/18 04:41 PM |
| 7 | Google Manager to Employees: "Next time you get invited to speak at a conference, especially if you’re a white male – ask the organizer to confirm you’re the only white male on the panel / in the speaker lineup. If not, say you are honored, but must decline, and give the reason."You don’t know what you’re talking about. A state’s popular vote decides to whom its electoral votes go. The gerrymandering within a state has no effect on how those electoral votes are cast. You are linking the electoral college and gerrymandering when there is no such link. Democrats gerrymander just as much as Republicans. Look at Maryland’s district map. As a historical note, gerrymandering became a thing when democrats successfully pushed for “minority majority” districts to increase minori… | /r/MensRights | 04/02/18 04:36 PM |
| 12 | Google Manager to Employees: "Next time you get invited to speak at a conference, especially if you’re a white male – ask the organizer to confirm you’re the only white male on the panel / in the speaker lineup. If not, say you are honored, but must decline, and give the reason."You ask for a “democratically” gerrymandered state...I gave you one. If you understood the purpose of gerrymandering, you’d know why 1 of 8 Maryland districts being Republican is not at all a surprising outcome. And you still have not explained your claim of a link between gerrymandering and voter suppression (in national elections). | /r/MensRights | 04/02/18 04:26 PM |
| 6 | Google Manager to Employees: "Next time you get invited to speak at a conference, especially if you’re a white male – ask the organizer to confirm you’re the only white male on the panel / in the speaker lineup. If not, say you are honored, but must decline, and give the reason."Re: Maryland That’s the whole point of gerrymandering...to “corral” the opposing party’s high density areas into a single (or select few) districts. It solidifies the majority’s control. | /r/MensRights | 04/02/18 04:19 PM |
| 13 | Google Manager to Employees: "Next time you get invited to speak at a conference, especially if you’re a white male – ask the organizer to confirm you’re the only white male on the panel / in the speaker lineup. If not, say you are honored, but must decline, and give the reason."Maryland. Please explain how gerrymandering enables voter suppression. | /r/MensRights | 04/02/18 03:45 PM |
| 9 | Canada: Senate passed a bill removing male pronouns in national anthem. 'I'm very, very happy.'Equality is not their end game. Uprooting western civilization and its underpinnings are the ultimate goal. | /r/MensRights | 04/02/18 03:35 PM |
| 10 | The negative comments will come from other womenThis works indefinitely if you stand in the fresh air for 5 minutes between rotations | /r/MensRights | 04/02/18 03:31 PM |
| 27 | Google Manager to Employees: "Next time you get invited to speak at a conference, especially if you’re a white male – ask the organizer to confirm you’re the only white male on the panel / in the speaker lineup. If not, say you are honored, but must decline, and give the reason."Gerrymandering has zero effect on presidential elections. Also, democrats are guilty as well. | /r/MensRights | 04/02/18 03:10 PM |
| 2 | Jordan Peterson: Boys are being set up to fail | "Decline in men at universities bad for both sexes"I can understand your point of view. I’ve never thought JP to have expertise in anything other than his chosen profession, and where he ventures outside that expertise, it seems (to me) his opinions are generally well informed. I’m not an expert in psychology or the history of various political ideologies, but I’m always willing to hear both sides of any argument, and draw my own conclusions. I have not personally seen JP be corrected or seriously challenged on either of the above-mentioned topi… | /r/MensRights | 04/02/18 01:38 AM |
| 4 | Jordan Peterson: Boys are being set up to fail | "Decline in men at universities bad for both sexes"Funny how 2 people can hear the same guy and reach utterly opposite conclusions. I think he is the most thoughtful and clearly spoken advocate for his positions that I’ve seen in decades | /r/MensRights | 04/02/18 12:53 AM |
| 1 | Jordan Peterson: Boys are being set up to fail | "Decline in men at universities bad for both sexes"Explain please. | /r/MensRights | 03/02/18 08:21 PM |
| 0 | After feminist cry sexism over BBC pay, official review uncovers more underpaid men than womenYou must also have such a thing as being overpaid then, right? | /r/MensRights | 31/01/18 03:52 PM |
| 2 | After feminist cry sexism over BBC pay, official review uncovers more underpaid men than womenYea, I agree. In fact that’s where I am now. Unfortunately, you give up other important things when changing jobs (in my case I’d lose pension accrual and probably at least 2-3 weeks vacation). New hires aren’t getting a pension and start with 2 weeks vacation. Plus, starting over at a new company just flat out sucks, IMO. But, ultimately, the choice is ours. | /r/MensRights | 31/01/18 03:47 PM |
| 1 | After feminist cry sexism over BBC pay, official review uncovers more underpaid men than womenThere’s good reason to not let Bob know what Tim makes. Every Bob out there think’s he’s as good or better than Tim, and should make the same (or better) money. There is no shortage of salary info out there. If you agree to your pay, you can’t blame your employer. | /r/MensRights | 31/01/18 03:01 PM |
| 1 | TRUMP: 'I wouldn't say I'm a feminist ... because I'm actually for EVERYONE'Um k | /r/MensRights | 30/01/18 04:12 AM |
| 1 | TRUMP: 'I wouldn't say I'm a feminist ... because I'm actually for EVERYONE'You’re not very bright are you? You stated that I would not benefit, and instead of admitting you don’t have a clue when called out, you double down in stupidity. Fuck off, and take your minimum wage job with you. | /r/MensRights | 30/01/18 03:56 AM |
| 1 | TRUMP: 'I wouldn't say I'm a feminist ... because I'm actually for EVERYONE'I don’t think you know my tax situation, so you claiming I won’t benefit is, well, disingenuous. I will benefit, for the next ten years. I have run the numbers and I will pay significantly less. In addition, I got an unexpected bonus, so I have already benefited. My situation is not uncommon, and I’m not wealthy. I will do better under this tax structure than in the Obama years, where tax cuts were taken away. Corporations create jobs. I want the corporation I work for to have loads of cash. The… | /r/MensRights | 30/01/18 03:11 AM |
| 1 | Woman Writes 5 Major Reasons Why Men Should Never MarryI agree, you can’t cover child support in a prenup...there are legal guidelines for that. You can cover pre-marital assets however, and other things related to child rearing. | /r/MensRights | 29/01/18 06:49 PM |
| 1 | TRUMP: 'I wouldn't say I'm a feminist ... because I'm actually for EVERYONE'You imply “corporate controlled” is in some way worse than “politician controlled”. The government has no incentive whatsoever to preserve capital or even be efficient in its allocation. The government also has the power to take your $ by force, and imprison you. I’d much rather have corporations running the show personally. At least, in that scenario I could “drop out” of the system altogether without fear of being imprisoned for not paying my perpetual tax bill. | /r/MensRights | 29/01/18 04:42 PM |
| 1 | TRUMP: 'I wouldn't say I'm a feminist ... because I'm actually for EVERYONE'Trump does not make tax law, Congress does, so lets give credit where it’s due. Under Obama, the estate tax exemption went from $1M to $5M (yes, a 500% increase). This was done primarily due to farming and other privately owned small businesses. Children who inherited, for example, a farm worth $10M would (previously) incur a tax bill of about $4M. The only way for them to pay that (in many cases) is to sell all or part of the business. Seems a bit unfair to me, but it could be argued that it’s … | /r/MensRights | 29/01/18 04:03 PM |
| 1 | TRUMP: 'I wouldn't say I'm a feminist ... because I'm actually for EVERYONE'Not sure what property tax breaks you’re referring to. The new tax plan reduces the deductions for property tax to a limit of $10k. That affects the wealthy almost exclusively (increases their Federal tax burden). Do you know any poor people paying over $10k in property tax annually? | /r/MensRights | 29/01/18 03:25 PM |
| 1 | TRUMP: 'I wouldn't say I'm a feminist ... because I'm actually for EVERYONE'Not true. Corporate cuts go to corporations. Millions of Americans are employed by those corporations and they benefit individually (as can be seen by the bonuses and pay increases already being handed out by over 300 of those corporations). New jobs are also created by the additional investment (Apple, for example). New jobs create even more upward pressure on wages. Companies also increase dividend payouts, and their increased financial health raises their stock valuation (as you know, many mi… | /r/MensRights | 29/01/18 03:13 PM |
| 1 | Woman Writes 5 Major Reasons Why Men Should Never MarryNo, it’s still a contract, and as such can cover the possibility of children. Obviously, you can’t contract yourself out of child support, but you can certainly protect your pre-marital assets. | /r/MensRights | 29/01/18 02:58 PM |
| 1 | TRUMP: 'I wouldn't say I'm a feminist ... because I'm actually for EVERYONE'But you’re paying less in the long run. You get a tax break for 10 years, your taxes then go back exactly where they were...yet you can’t admit you’re better off in the long run? You seem to be an ideologue. I don’t remember any tax relief under the previous administration. In fact, our last administration supported letting the Bush cuts expire (which they did). Effectively, the cut is a wage increase, at least for 10 years. If you’re not getting wage increases, maybe you need to improve yoursel… | /r/MensRights | 29/01/18 02:54 PM |
| 1 | TRUMP: 'I wouldn't say I'm a feminist ... because I'm actually for EVERYONE'All individual’s cuts expire, regardless of income. It is the corporate rate cuts that are permanent. | /r/MensRights | 29/01/18 03:16 AM |
| 7 | Woman Writes 5 Major Reasons Why Men Should Never MarryActually, it’s not that easy to get around a well-written prenup. Those that are challenged in court successfully are often tossed due to coercion (like getting your fiancé to sign the morning of your wedding). Best practice is to have your (or her) lawyer write it up, then the other’s lawyer reviews, then formally sign (in the presence of both lawyers) a week or two after all agreements are documented, and well distanced in time from any emotionally charged events (marriage, funeral, etc). Do t… | /r/MensRights | 29/01/18 03:11 AM |
| 1 | TRUMP: 'I wouldn't say I'm a feminist ... because I'm actually for EVERYONE'Taxes will only go back to where they are now (the cuts will expire), and that’s only if congress won’t reauthorize. Would you rather have 10 years of reduced taxes or no years? | /r/MensRights | 29/01/18 01:11 AM |
| 3 | New Alimony Tax Rules: New tax law no longer allows a deduction for the guy, and the woman will no longer pay taxes on the income. Allows mother easily to qualify for the newly expanded $2,000 credit. Increases the guy's taxable income, which probably pushes him into a higher tax bracket.Married 20 years and you don’t believe in hell? You’re in it brother, and I’m there too. For 21 years, she refused to work (has a degree), then she just fucking left. Filed for no-fault and now I get to pay her $3k/month FOR LIFE! Considered offing myself for spite. | /r/MensRights | 26/01/18 06:39 PM |
| 1 | New Alimony Tax Rules: New tax law no longer allows a deduction for the guy, and the woman will no longer pay taxes on the income. Allows mother easily to qualify for the newly expanded $2,000 credit. Increases the guy's taxable income, which probably pushes him into a higher tax bracket.Yes, but fuck the payer, he doesn’t need to maintain anything but his payments! | /r/MensRights | 26/01/18 06:32 PM |
| 1 | Why am I a terrible person just for being a man?I’m glad you can, at least, acknowledge there is a disparity! | /r/MensRights | 25/01/18 07:17 PM |
| 1 | Why am I a terrible person just for being a man?You’re right, the number is actually closer to 15% of married women are breadwinners. Still the 97/3 alimony disparity indicates a strong bias. I am arguing a lack of fairness in divorce proceedings You are arguing a lack of equal outcomes after divorce These 2 things are not necessarily related | /r/MensRights | 25/01/18 05:20 PM |
| 3 | Why am I a terrible person just for being a man?Alimony is not limited to stay at home spouses. With 40% of married women being breadwinner, something closer to 60/40 percentages in the number of alimony awards would indicate a lack of bias. 97/3 is indicative of a massive bias. The fact that 40% of married women are breadwinners also indicates that the disparity in the career/family choice is not as significant as you imply. More importantly, how are women getting treated unfairly in divorce, as you claimed? The article you linked discusses … | /r/MensRights | 25/01/18 04:44 PM |
| 3 | Why am I a terrible person just for being a man?What stats, specifically? Here are some quick google finds. According to the 2010 US Census, 97% of alimony recipients are women, yet in roughly 40% of households, the woman is breadwinner. Also: 79 % of custodial mothers receive a support award, while only 29 % of custodial fathers receive a support award. 47% of non-custodial mothers totally default on support, while 26% percent of non-custodial fathers totally default on support. 75% of children with divorced parents live with their mother. h… | /r/MensRights | 25/01/18 04:22 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter