TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

yeti_button Archive

View 0 posts and 167 comments by yeti_button on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

lol. You're describing most women who post here.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/26 04:30 AM
3

lots of us have complexions, phenotypes, physique, etc. that we were born with that people IRL and online talk shit about constantly. Sure, but the amount of short man bashing is far beyond anything else I've seen, and there's no close second. And I will gladly be proven wrong about that. A friend pointed it out to me about a year ago. I thought he was exaggerating; boy was I wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 08:57 AM
4

r/WomenAndMales
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 03:24 AM
6

Comments like this make it clear that she's here in bad faith.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 03:23 AM
–

You already admitted in another comment that women have it easier in every way, so we're good.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 02:36 AM
–

That's a pretty cool deflection, I guess. Thanks again for sharing that scholarship info; it will come in very handy in future bad-faith questions like the OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 02:02 AM
–

You made a claim and I asked you substantiate it. Pretty basic, standard stuff. The notion that I need to go searching for examples to validate your made-up claim is pretty silly. Again, show me some examples of anyone saying that women's lives are easy "in every aspect of life from birth til death." If you've seen them, it shouldn't be too hard to share them. Again, pretty basic stuff. I have no reason to Of course you do. Oh and don't call me lazy. That's a personal attack and against the rule…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 01:59 AM
–

"Nothing like that for men" was clearly overstated, but I'm glad you shared this. A quick count shows around 70 scholarships for men and 380 for women. lol. Of the scholarships that show the reward amount, six men's scholarships have rewards of over $5000, whereas 84 women's scholarships surpass that amount. Talk about privilege!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 01:53 AM
–

You can do that on your own. lol. So in other words, you made it up. Thought so. There are tons of dudes here claiming that's its easier to get a job, graduate from college, date, and just generally putting much less effort into anything in life tonhave the same things as a man. The three things you mentioned are not "every aspect of life from birth til death." Hope that helps.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 01:46 AM
–

when ppl make it seem like womens lives are easy in every aspect of life from birth til death Give some examples of anyone saying that women's lives are easy "in every aspect of life from birth til death."
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 01:35 AM
3

FYI, a handful of angry, silly women are following you around and downvoting your shit. You may want to stop posting for a day or so, until they move on.
/r/seduction04/06/24 10:41 AM
1

I listen to a lot of true crime Well yeah, that's just assumed. they killed their own families Not what I asked. Anyway, a very cursory search of the first one seems to show that he killed his wife so he could be with his lover, or something. Are you sure it was because he was rejected? More importantly, is there any evidence at all that any of these cases are caused by "over dependence"? I would think that a man would not want to kill the person that he's overly dependent on (but hey, that's ju…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 06:02 AM
1

You just did it again.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 05:39 AM
1

Hey, can you point to an example of a man killing a woman and her entire family merely because she rejected him?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 05:38 AM
1

You sure lie a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 05:37 AM
1

lol at you downvoting my comments
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 05:35 AM
1

The fact that you have to pretend you meant something that you clearly did not mean tells me that you now probably agree that it was hysterical. Don't feel too bad about it. Ah yes, "reading comprehension." Good one. I suspect the only things you've ever read in your life are the books assigned in school. Hey, what did you think about The Catcher in the Rye? 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 05:34 AM
1

Very. I've explained it in detail above. Feel free to go back, read, and interact with what I've already written.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 05:28 AM
1

it’s not hysterical to say You can stop there. I already explained above what I found hysterical. Feel free to re-read if you want. Yes, yes, you really meant men killing their own families. Sure, sure 😉
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 05:27 AM
1

You're hella dishonest and hysterical, lady.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 05:23 AM
2

Sure you did. But I'm glad I was able to help you see the error of your ways. You're welcome 👍
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 05:18 AM
1

I stated that it’s a spectrum of terrible reactions. You, in fact, did not originally "state" that there's a spectrum. You mentioned two things: "harass/kill." You literally asked me what I meant by hysteria so I told you what it is you said that I found hysterical. I didn't mention "harass" because, well, I don't find that hysterical. Why do I need to walk you through this really basic stuff step by step?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 05:17 AM
2

Wait, aren't you the one who acted like it was commonplace for men to kill women and their families just for being rejected? 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 05:06 AM
2

I was referring to their own families. Oh, you're still doing this. 1. The pronoun "their" clearly refers back to the most recent noun, "women." That's how any disinterested party would interpret that sentence. 2. I already explained that your little post hoc revision makes no sense in context. The best-case scenario for you is that you're just a really bad communicator and wrote something ambiguous. But that still wouldn't be an example of me "misreading." As for the second thing, I literally a…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 05:02 AM
1

Pointing out men's violence isn't necessarily hysteria. Hysteria is saying that men kill women and their families merely for being rejected, and implying that it's so common that it's the reason you want men to tell women that they don't need them 😂 Hope that helps.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 04:59 AM
1

you misread what I said about family annihilators Don't be silly. Feel free to demonstrate that I misread you (you wont). and didn’t understand my statement about that behavior being on the spectrum of terrible responses men have to rejection Don't be silly. Feel free to demonstrate that I didn't understand you (you wont). It’s okay to be wrong. Good one.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 04:03 AM
1

Pointing out men’s violence isn’t hysteria. I never claimed that it was. Next. The rest of your comment is foundering gibberish. I.e. you're terrified to even attempt a response. Run along, lightweight.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 04:03 AM
6

Totally. It sounds like you meant to say "Another woman said something ridiculous so I chimed in with something irrelevant in an attempt to 'save' her."
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 10:02 PM
3

"Blindly disagreeing" doesn't mean anything here. You said something silly and hysterical and I made fun of it. Sorry that hurt your feelings. you seem to have trouble reading Don't be silly. By the time I turned 20 I'd already read more than you'll ever read in your entire life 😂 But feel free to demonstrate my "trouble reading." That should be fun.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 08:39 PM
2

I always meant their own families Totally. You may find it profitable to go back and see the comment you originally replied to: And I'm sure women love it when guys tell them they don't need them. To which you replied "it’s precisely what I want, because [hysteria]." Yes, you want men to tell their wives that they don't need them. Good one. Then the other commenter trying to pretend that men losing their jobs is at all germane to the disagreement. The lengths you people go trough to try to "win"…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 08:36 PM
1

You originally said that men annihilate the woman's family just for being rejected. You now changed it to men annihilating their own families, thinking I wouldn't notice 😂 But yes, crazy people will occasionally kill their own families for a variety of reasons, including as a response to threats of divorce, like this case here.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 08:23 PM
3

Feel free to re-read and interact with what I actually wrote; I'm not going to repeat myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 08:22 PM
1

No I'm not denying that "men have a spectrum of terrible responses to rejection." You already knew that though.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 08:22 PM
1

Attempting to shoehorn job loss into "rejection" is cute and all, but context makes it abundantly clear that we're talking about men being rejected by women, romantically. You already knew that though.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 07:14 PM
3

annihilate their families just for being rejected Most sane female PPD commenter.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 05:30 PM
1

Epic gamers need sex too; thank you for your sacrifice 🙏
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/24 03:17 AM
3

mediocre sex or video game spectatorship, or picking up your mess, or taking care of your kids, or looking at your cheating face Sounds like you're describing a trend. Boy some of you really make poor decisions.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/24 02:38 AM
1

I'm fairly certain a large amount of women on this sub are VERY unhappy about their lives You don't say
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 02:22 AM
1

Oh come on! The first link said that she falls in love with personality and that the guy was handsome to her. The title was misleading She misled in the title that she wrote herself? Presumably she knows what she means to say. Whatever the case, you didn't read the post carefully: in the opening sentence she says, "I thought he wasn't attractive." That alone settles it. She then says that, after she starts liking a guy, she finds him handsome. That's a completely different issue and doesn't unde…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 09:26 PM
1

And? The person I responded to pretendedclaimed to have never seen anyone say such a thing, so I provided examples from a quick search.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 06:14 PM
2

What's the fake account? I posted four different threads.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 06:12 PM
3

Here you go: https://np.reddit.com/r/dating/comments/uc92xo/i_gave_an_unattractive_guy_a_chance_and_he_was_so/ https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/m6jatn/women_who_give_ugly_guys_a_chance_should_stop/ https://np.reddit.com/r/dating_advice/comments/18zduju/should_i_give_a_guy_i_dont_find_physically/ https://np.reddit.com/r/FemaleDatingStrategy/comments/p8w9su/you_should_never_give_ugly_men_a_chance/
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 05:27 AM
2

Oh look, men say it too! https://www.tiktok.com/search?q=chance%20ugly%20girl&t=1708472864301 lol. Compare the views. The only top video from your search that broke 10,000 views is from a lesbian saying it about women 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 05:00 AM
1

So I take it that you agree with I wrote, because I can't see that your response here contradicts anything I said. I notice that, in this thread, you tend to frame things in an extreme, binary way. In the OP you mention "dying for and badly craving sex" and "filled with horniness." The reality is that there is a vast middle ground between those things and unenthusiastic, perfunctory "duty sex." Once a person recognizes that middle ground, the force of the point you made above evaporates. Oh and …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 02:33 AM
1

I disagree with your conception of withholding. I defined what it is to me. Your definition of it vs mine is where we disagree. I skimmed through this thread, and people aren't just wrong about sex and relationships, but they're wrong about the English language. This idea that "withhold" necessarily implies that the withholder is holding back on something they themselves really desire or else that the one being withheld on is entitled to something just isn't true. It doesn't reflect actual usage…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 12:34 AM
3

That's very weak evidence for your claim. I've dated plenty of women who had opposing sociopolitical/religious/etc. views. So I guess our very limited experiences cancel out. Forget dating; did you know that interfaith marriages are extremely common? I get that you guys want to "win" debates or whatever, but do you really need to resort to just fabricating stuff?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 11:28 PM
4

Men may be willing to date a woman with opposing values, opposing sociopolitical views or opposing religions if she’s attractive enough, but women aren’t. Nonsense. Where do you guys come up with stuff like this?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 07:06 AM
1

Not too long ago I posted something that was removed because it wasn't related to "the weekly topic." I wasn't aware of said "weekly topic" but I didn't care to look into it and just never posted anything again 🙂
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 07:45 PM
1

yeah, it says [removed]
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 07:08 PM
1

True, but the praise was for your equanimity in doing so 👍
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 09:53 AM
1

That's PPD in a nutshell (along with constant dishonesty). But bravo on parrying all of the limp-wristed, sneering comments and keeping your cool. You're a better man than I am!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 09:46 AM
1

and woman picking minority men OP doesn't say "minority men," it says "a minority of men." Do you honestly not know what that means?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 05:05 AM
1

the math isn’t mathing don't
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 04:12 AM
2

prestigious Master degree lol
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 07:52 PM
0

it takes a year and $10,000 Yeah, too bad there's no male equivalent to fake tits. $10,000 on CareCredit and a few weeks of healing. "It's the best decision I ever made!!"
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 01:55 AM
10

I like how you tell him what content you actually watch and his response is "nuh-uh." Classic PPD good faith interaction.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 01:00 AM
2

who is you You're trying too hard.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 12:54 AM
2

I’m not googling shit Right, because I preempted it. Stop parroting stuff that you have no clue about, dear.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 12:52 AM
2

That's a cute reply and all, but not a single company ever, has claimed that 100% of what we see is exclusively and narrowly based on things we've shown interest in. User interest is one of several factors that determine what social media sites show any particular user. literal proof that these companies aren’t allowed to keep from us If I challenged you on the spot to cite what you're vaguely alluding to here, you wouldn't be able to do it 😂 You're just parroting stuff you read online somewhere…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 12:39 AM
1

Your algorithm is showing you shit that you’ve shown interest in. This response is simplistic and overused. I get shown a ton of stuff I've never shown the slightest interest in, like random Spanish-language skits, or people cutting random objects in half.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/24 11:40 PM
2

Only among people who have confused it for lust, obsession, or affection. Hogwash. Only among competent speakers of English.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 10:32 PM
2

Love isn't an emotion, love is an action taken. Nonsense. "Love" has a range of meanings, but most commonly refers to an emotion or feeling.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 07:35 PM
2

It sounds like you are just arguing in bad faith No u. and are just mad about things women said about men who date 18 year olds. Sounds like you're just devastated that your hero Demi Moore is an old creepy lady who sought after power imbalance relationships so she could have someone to control. Gross!
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 05:05 AM
1

a bunch of angry things Yes, I'm the one who's clearly mad 😂 And somebody set that flair to shame women’s height preferences as “heightist” OK? 6'4" is tall.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 05:02 AM
1

25 is when the brain is fully developed lol. Junk science. Look up "fully mature brain myth." Slate had a good article about it a few years back. A large number of 40 year old men consider women who are 25 post wall That's interesting, but utterly irrelevant to anything I said. She didn’t meet him before he turned 18 or right when he turned 18 to groom him She was just waiting for him to turn 25 so she could say "his brain is finished developing!" What a creeper! She had more money This just hig…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 05:00 AM
1

Why did you take a screen shot? lol bizarre. Wait, do you think I typed out "heightism"? lol Nobody ever said 5'10" was short. I love that you accused me of just wanting to argue, but you're literally here hysterically writing random things just so you can get the last word 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 04:47 AM
1

Demi Moore and Ashton Kutcher are an example of this. I think he finally realized that she was a predator, pursuing someone 15 years younger than her. What could a 40 and 25-year-old possibly have in common? Completely different life stages! Total power imbalance. Creepy! Gross! Groomer much?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 04:44 AM
1

You combed through my profile to find the post. Hope that helps! Do you know what a flair is? I've never once in my life used the word "heightism." You should know this, since you went through and read everything I ever wrote lol
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 04:30 AM
1

I'm gratified that you're so furious at badly losing every single exchange with me that you frantically combed through my profile for things to "get" me on. But no, I've never once used the word "heightism." Why do you lie so much?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 04:20 AM
1

Calling me embarrassing Oh. If you don't like it, stop saying embarrassing things. Accusing me of lying You do it constantly, almost pathologically, even about the most trivial things. Denying the content of my posts Sorry for pointing out that some of your posts didn't give examples of women being hated on for preferring tall men. That's hardly bad faith, silly. You even admitted it for one (before you scurried away and hid under your desk). The few times you actually did post examples of women…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 04:17 AM
1

You are the one arguing in bad faith. Prove it. You're literally incapable of countering anything I say. I posted real screenshots from real men who were really shaming women for having height preferences. Please stop lying. Most of the stuff you posted had nothing at all to do with height preferences. You admitted it about the first one. You knew you'd have to admit it about others, which is why you ran away from our other exchange, terrified. You insisted they weren’t real I never said anythin…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 02:27 AM
1

A few obvious truths: Laughing at someone is clearly uncivil. Name-calling isn't the only way to be uncivil. Saying that someone is being embarrassing isn't name calling. Regarding the likes: The "vast majority" of likes were not from men. Your original claim wasn't "vast majority." You're welcome for helping you see your errors. I noticed you ran from our other exchange. I'm not the least bit surprised. Typical bad faith. Let me know if you need more assistance understanding all this simple stu…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 10:54 PM
1

Well that's a different claim now, isn't it? A quick skim through that comment's likes reveals a bunch of women. Would you like me to explain anything else? Oh, and "lmfao" is uncivil. Please stop being uncivil.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 08:52 PM
1

That is an example of men shaming women for wanting a good man. “You aren’t good enough”. It actually doesn't say any of that, but regardless. So the answer to my question is "No." No, that's not an example of women being hated on for preferring tall men. Let me know if you grant this simple, obvious point, and we can move forward.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 08:46 PM
1

I mean, I understand that you'd want to dismiss my challenge as "foolish" because I caught you in another lie. You implied that all the people who liked that comment were men. That's why you ran and hid when I challenged you to substantiate the claim. And no, it wasn't "sarcasm." Stop it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 08:34 PM
1

You could explain what shaming is, instead of being like “nuh uh”. Calling women’s standards ridiculous, unrealistic, exaggerated, etc is shaming them. You're not making any sense. Here, let's walk through this one step at a time. Let's test your "civility" and "good faith": Is this an example of women being hated on for preferring tall men?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 08:30 PM
1

Calling someone “embarrassing” is uncivil. I disagree. But feel free to present an argument. If the examples aren’t suitable for you, which took me like 30 seconds BTW, elaborate what exactly shaming someone is if not calling them “superficial” Most of the examples you gave just were not examples of men shaming women for their height preferences. Others have made the same observation. Portraying them as merely "not suitable" for me is dishonest framing. I already granted the "superficial" remark…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 08:20 PM
1

I missed the "superficial" line, so I grant this one. Glad I could help you find more appropriate examples!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 07:54 PM
1

That’s literally what you denied existed. Stop lying. I never denied anything existed. There are obviously some men out there who hate on women for their height standards. I said the examples you gave were bad. Also, you’re no longer being civil in this conversation. You constantly lying and spamming bad examples is uncivil.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 07:53 PM
1

Woohoo! After hours and hours of searching, you found a single comment with two likes! lol. So embarrassing
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 07:46 PM
1

I don’t assume that something is a majority view because it has millions of followers. I agree, that's why I said it depends on the nature of the claim. Concluding that Qanon is the majority is unwarranted and irrational. I will say though, I just looked it up, and apparently some polls show that as many as 15% of Americans believe in the fundamental tenets of Qanon. That's 1. depressing, but 2. actually higher than what I would have estimated just from what I see on social media. Then again, I …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 07:08 PM
1

This is not an example of women being hated on for preferring tall men. 😂 The rest of your examples are presumably this bad, so I won't waste my time. You are really bad at this.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 07:01 PM
1

That link doesn't work 😂 And I said that the several comments I looked at weren't examples. That's beyond dispute. You thought you ate Utterly cringey.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 06:59 PM
2

Social media is a terrible data point. I don't want to belabor this point, but it really depends on the nature of the evidence and the nature of the claim. Agreed that it's crazy to conclude that a claim "must be true" because a lot of people liked a post. But it's not crazy to conclude that there are millions of Qanon believers when Qanon posts regularly get millions of likes/shares/etc. It's likewise not irrational to conclude that the antivax movement has grown in the past few years (just bas…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 07:15 AM
2

I agree with your stance as stated (with some minor quibbles). We'd probably disagree on 1. what counts as bad data, and 2. whether "data" is needed at all in a given case. I'm curious: what evidence, apart from published studies, is it reasonable for a person to use to draw conclusions about, e.g. issues in dating and interpersonal relationships, social attitudes about sex and gender, etc. ?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 06:28 AM
2

But both should both be ignored entirely. No, that's too strong. A short man, for instance, is not irrational to look at OLD stats to help him determine if OLD is a good use of his time, mental/emotional energy, etc. Yes, some random person saying something is weak evidence for a claim, regardless of whether or not that random person writes a comment or makes a video. But if we can look at view/like counts to infer, for instance, what kind of music is trending and popular, we can likewise use th…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 05:58 AM
1

Yep, both should be ignored entirely. As I told the other guy, I don't have a problem with anyone who has genuine principles and applies them consistently. That said, I think the above statement is too hasty. Yes, random comments are meaningless, but I do think we can draw measured (but cautious) inferences based on what sort of content is popular. It's not a coincidence that the countless videos with millions of likes making fun of short guys is mirrored by actual OLD stats (then again, the sam…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 05:26 AM
-2

The fact that women are attracted to a handsome, famous, rich, talented man who is barely below average height is a good point to you? lol
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 04:39 AM
2

You responded to a comment that asked where woman are hated on constantly for preferring tall men. This isn't "another example" of women being hated on for preferring tall men. Hope that helps! edit: a quick glance a few other comments you posted here are likewise not examples of women being hated on for preferring tall men. lol. You're pretty bad at this.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 04:34 AM
3

To be fair, I also dismiss TikTok rage bait when used as anecdotal evidence. I have no issue with anyone who is genuinely consistent. It's a shame public pushshift searches no longer work. In the past, when someone in PPD said something like "look at this mean man's comment!" as evidence for some male pathology, it was trivially easy to find them commenting elsewhere "social media isn't real life!" lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 04:27 AM
1

why do bluepillers keep repeating this? Dishonestly. They'll happily cite a downvoted comment in PPD as conclusive evidence that men are a certain way.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 04:16 AM
-2

internally bitching LOL! What an embarrassing thing to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 03:57 AM
10

That's typical PPD dishonesty. Certain people here will dismiss instagram/tiktok videos even if they have millions of likes, but then refer to some -6 comment in PPD as evidence of something. Sometimes they just make stuff up as evidence, and then scurry away when asked for proof.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 03:54 AM
3

It is just weird Thinking that adults being attracted to other adults is weird, possibly deranged.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 12:31 AM
1

and 21k other chads saying Provide evidence that all those 21k likes are men, let alone "chads."
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 07:23 AM
1

or do I need to go slower Going slower doesn't work with dishonest people, unfortunately.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 07:07 AM
4

They always run away when challenged to provide evidence for their hysterical claims.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 06:48 AM
2

The claim was: men around here threaten violence as a very possible solution to feeling lonely The example comment you give is 1. not a threat of violence, and 2. not presented as a solution to feeling lonely. Why are you people so bad at this?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 06:40 AM
5

It's no fun if you don't argue. Out!
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 03:59 AM
2

He both mops the floors and cleans the toilet and tub.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 03:03 AM
3

I actually do hire maid service weekly! So then you don't, in fact, "do all those things."
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 02:42 AM
4

and you totally made that up That's PPD in a nutshell.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 02:40 AM
1

My comment wasn't about a video.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 04:36 AM
1

Did you reply to the wrong person? I didn't mention or refer to any woman performing a service. I responded to a specific comment about the implications of body shaming particular people.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 04:13 AM
1

I think I have a good grasp on the psychology and mechanics of insults. One of my favorite Chris Rock bits is something along the lines of "I have nothing against disabled people, but if a guy with a gimpy leg rear-ends me.. I'm saying something about that leg!" So yes, some insults are employed merely to hurt the target and don't reflect the deeply-held beliefs of the insulter. But the beliefs of the insulter are clearly irrelevant to my claim: ridiculing someone because they are fat (or short,…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/24 11:38 PM
2

If other men who happen to share aspects of that image feel attacked by that, it sounds like their own insecurities talking to me because they should be smart enough to realize an attack on Andrew Tate's body is not an attack on their body. This is confused. When you attack a person that you dislike by commenting on their weight, or height, or complexion, or lack-of-chin, etc. you're implying that being short, overweight, etc. is bad and worthy of ridicule. Anyone who is "smart enough" would imm…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/24 05:56 AM
1

That's obviously not a "lie." Stop being hysterical. And wait a minute, I thought accusing someone of lying was "uncivil." lol you have absolutely no principles. And yes, "men are always using women for sex" is clearly meant to be a bad thing. What are you doing?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/24 02:07 AM
1

It’s not a lie. lol. You're clearly lying. Stop it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/24 02:04 AM
1

It’s not a desperate play. It clearly is. I always stay civil. I already explained why this isn't true.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/24 02:04 AM
1

Because men and women are different. Yes, yes. Men bad, women good. I mean, at least you're transparent about your simplistic, hysterical biases. Men are always using women for sex. Moore was using Kutcher for sex. There, we've exchanged assertions. Next.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/24 01:50 AM
1

That took me like 30 seconds. See? You'll lie about even the most trivial things.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/24 01:49 AM
1

It’s not desperation. Suddenly appealing to the "rules" is obviously a desperation play; especially when you yourself break the rules constantly. You have nothing to argue besides scathing and hostile personal attacks. You're lying again. You really should stop doing that. I win because I manage to be civil and have a coherent argument while you don’t. You've not presented a single argument in this entire thread. And you're not civil; there's nothing civil about constantly lying. And frantically…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/24 01:49 AM
1

lol now you're following me around from thread to thread? Wow, you're really mad you lost, aren't you? Universally people knew it wouldn’t work out And? That's so obviously irrelevant to my claim. Ashton was likely using her. That's also irrelevant. And I like that when an old woman gets with a young man, it's still the man who's the guilty party. lol get therapy.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/24 12:49 AM
1

lol @ you combing through my profile for 20 minutes, looking for something to "get" me on. So embarrassing. As I've said before, people like you or the coward in that thread don't actually have a problem with me trying to "own" people or being "mean." They really just have a problem that I'm so much better at it. I.e. you're just mad cause you lost.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/24 12:47 AM
1

If you don't like being called out on your lying and bad-faith posting, you really should stop lying and posting in bad faith. seething Oh dear. You’re violating every rule here. lol. The desperation is kicking in.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/24 12:46 AM
1

Don't be silly, I demonstrated that you lied. You had no reply but "nuh-uh" Your 40% upvoted failure of a gotcha thread is done. Stop trying to cling to scraps of pride by replying to me with substanceless comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/24 12:17 AM
1

I'm not sure how to reply to that, but we can look at the claim itself: only women care about looks and compete for the best-looking partners I mean, how many men could possibly believe even the first half of the conjunction, "only women care about looks"? That's plainly absurd, and the percentage of men who believe it has to be insignificant.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 11:18 PM
1

lol. How embarrassing. You have no idea what "semantics" means, do you? And you’re here in bad faith Oh dear. Yes, me pointing out your obvious bad faith behavior is itself bad faith. Good one.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 11:14 PM
–

You posting timestamps and personally attacking me as “dishonest” doesn’t make your argument right. The timestamps do, in fact, prove that you're lying and, consequently, that I'm correct. So asserting otherwise is just intransigence. You know it, which is why you don't dare to even attempt to argue otherwise. My argument is that men are overly picky when speed dating but then get mad and accuse women of being overly picky. That's an assertion, not an argument. But yes, I know this is what you c…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 08:35 PM
–

None of that is true; you're lying. You responded specifically to u/KayRay1994 : And I have a gaggle of men insisting that men are more than happy to settle for less than ideal. But now you’re saying they aren’t? Moreover, you can see the timestamp of your response: 3:03 UTC. That was before every-single top-level comment had even been written, save KayRay's and one other. And the vast majority of comments don't say the women aren't "good enough." Typically dishonest ppd poster. Why are you even…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 08:17 PM
2

you've never seen a red pill man say 80% of women are attracted to 20% of men This I've heard, yes. but men think most women are attractive I may or may not have heard things like this, but you'd have to quantify (as you did with the claim above) for me to gauge how common a claim like that is. Either way, both of those statements combined clearly doesn't add up to "only women care about looks and compete for the best-looking partners," which was your original claim. What I have seen several tim…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 07:47 PM
-5

Literally women in their "prime" age also think they're gross I've been assured that only a few weirdos on Twitter (and kids on Tiktok) think it's weird. I'm so confused! edit: yeah you better not even attempt a response
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 07:25 PM
3

You don't appear to know what "good faith" means. You weren't asking the question because you were genuinely curious; you were asking it as a set up for a gotcha. You essentially admitted it just now ("but the truth is revealed" lol). As for that gotcha, if you could find a post where u/KayRay1994 seems to contradict himself, then I guess you can do a victory dance or whatever. But 1. you probably can't, and 2. it would only apply to him, not to "guys here" in general. Hope that helps.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 07:17 PM
3

because men pretend only women care about looks and compete for the best-looking partners I've never seen a man make that claim, but sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 07:12 PM
4

You didn't actually address my claim. Nothing I've seen from you here is "words of motivation." u/Altruistic_Talk_828 said that the goal was to dispel a notion, not to "complain that dating isn't fair." You seem to not be taking this seriously and are just replying to me for the sake of arguing, or saving face or something. Which is odd, given your stance about the utility of arguing online.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 10:04 AM
6

The difference is I am imploring men to self improve AKA writing more stuff online. We can either influence people with our words online or we can't. If we can, then your response above falls flat. If we can't, then why are you here?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 09:43 AM
9

It's going to take a lot more than complaining on the internet to prove that. You're "complaining on the internet" right now, presumably trying to change people's minds about something. There's no difference in principle between what you're doing and what u/Altruistic_Talk_828 claims he and others are doing.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 09:26 AM
11

But now you’re saying they aren’t? Lol I love it. You ask why more guys don't speed date. You get an honest answer, and so respond with this desperate gotcha attempt. Can you at least pretend you're asking in good faith?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 05:47 AM
0

Chris Evans, who’s in his 40s, recently married a 25 year old woman and got shit for it Remember when a 40-year-old Demi Moore got with a 25-year-old Ashton Kutcher, and got nothing but "Yaaas Queeen!" for it? 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 05:27 AM
1

I *think* they're agreeing with you. Hard to be sure though.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 05:21 AM
1

I agree and didn't say or suggest otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 08:54 PM
1

I suspected as much, given the framing ("so many men" vs "some women"), but didn't want to presume. I won't argue the point here, but suffice to say, my assessment is completely the opposite. I wonder if you'd agree with this: that, as far as what's acceptable in "polite society," ridiculing short men is allowed, whereas ridiculing fat women is not tolerated.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 02:40 AM
1

So many men feel the need to shit on fat women publicly, and some women do the same with short men Since you mentioned it, just curious: which of those two do you think is way more common?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 01:37 AM
–

Rejecting them because you are racist and therefore not attracted is not. That's fine; then you agree with me that the claim "its ok to reject anyone based off anything" is incorrect. The list I quickly typed out is based on a multitude of conversations and interactions I've witnessed on and offline. For instance, men who reject women once they find out about all their past sexual encounters are often called "shallow" and "immature," indicating—obviously—that the person calling them such things …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 01:30 AM
-1

If you’re not attracted, you’re not attracted. That's a meaningless tautology. What is the discussion here? What, exactly, do you need me to explain to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 08:56 PM
2

its ok to reject anyone based off anything Always strange to see comments like these upvoted. To the women who upvoted this, is it "ok" for a man to reject a woman merely because: she's over 23? she has a high "bodycount"? she's had an abortion? she's flat? she's confident? she thinks for herself? she's black? I suspect that the vast majority of women who upvoted the comment would, in any other circumstance, say that rejection for at least one of the above reasons is deeply problematic and empha…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 09:00 AM
11

Women Rank 5 Men by Attractiveness
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 03:30 AM
6

That would be the entire male population other than my brothers. "Why do men call women hysterical???"
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/24 09:27 AM
11

He's saying a lot of guys have opened up and shown vulnerability to women only for it to ultimately harm them and the relationship. One time my wife and I had it out and I cried a lot in front of her for the first time in our relationship. The next day she was like "wow, I've never seen you cry that much..." It wasn't a compliment. So yeah—never again.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/24 08:49 AM
2

I bet that the people who liked her comment also liked this post 😂 I.e. It's bad to draw inferences from videos with millions of likes, but let me imply something based on "several" comments that I just made up right now. lol these people are profoundly dishonest
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 03:41 AM
5

Cool, link to a few.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 03:32 AM
10

I’ve seen several men here (PPD) define struggling as not having easy access to as much casual sex with “looksmatched” women as they want (I.e. several times a week with very little effort expended etc.) What's the point of comments like these? You have not, in fact, seen "several" men who "define" struggling as not having easy access to casual sex several times a week with very little effort. What's the point of coming into a debate/discussion sub and just outright lying? What does that do for …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 03:06 AM
–

She edited her comment and wrote those paragraphs in response to the guy saying that she added nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 08:28 AM
1

lol at you still saying "prey." You're so furious that you'll never be with your crush that you can't stop talking about him. Here's the post where you jumped in to seethe about him unprompted. Weirdo. As for "touching grass," you spend way more time on reddit than I do, probably by like an order of magnitude. Another swing and a miss. I've been married over a decade. I just like to come into subs like this to laugh at the born losers absolutely struggling with dating, and to toss around lightwe…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 07:48 AM
1

The whole point was “why do women not like it” And it was explained. lol. It's clear from the OP that the women who don't like it are older women looking in, not the women being pursued. You know that though. The rest of what you wrote has nothing to do with me. Run along.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 06:51 AM
1

I love how you're trying to play it cool after your little meltdown over your childhood crush Leo. But yeah, if I were you I'd also give up on trying to "win" this little debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 06:47 AM
1

Remember when you lied about not "preying" for Dicaprio's downfall? That was funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 06:45 AM
1

you could’ve fooled me But earlier you patted yourself on the back for not being fooled. lol. You're not very good at this, are you? As for the rest, I could not care less about what somebody else wrote; that has nothing to do with me. Not sure why that's not obvious to you, but here we are. I've not once "defended" Dicaprio here, so you must have me confused with someone else. I've merely pointed out dishonesty, hypocrisy, and overall stupidity. You're enraged because you're the target. Cry mor…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 03:41 AM
1

Ah yes, just ignore what I write and continue to fabulate. lol. Cool strategy for dumb people who realize they're completely out of their league 👍
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 03:33 AM
1

What the fuck? I'm a man. I was mocking your juvenille "if you love him so much why don’t you date him" quip. You don't appear to have the cognitive capacity to be discussing these issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 03:30 AM
-1

"nobody is preying [sic] for his downfall!" I love that you clowns have no principles :)
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 03:15 AM
1

I'm not "redpill" and I've never said a word about Dicaprio outside of this thread. But sure, I want to date him. I love that instead of admitting that I easily proved your dishonest statement to be incorrect, so instead change the subject and say more dishonest things. lol you people are so deranged.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 03:12 AM
–

im guessing the dudes being pursued DONT MIND. What? So if the young woman doesn't mind, then it's OK? I thought the whole point was that it's creepy and predatory to go after younger people because they're too naive to know what they're getting into and "their brains haven't even developed yet!!" You guys need to get your stories straight.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 03:08 AM
–

but the sole reason he gets to choose is because of his socioeconomic status A lot of women can be bought? Isn't that like, misogynistic, or something?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 02:46 AM
2

when i look at leo i see a sad lonely and possibly mentally ill man who is heading into the twilight of his life with no companion, nobody who truly loves or sees him, and no ability to pair bond. that’s really sad Ah, so this is like the cat-lady trope, but for men. I thought that was just a cope for incels? I guess we've come full circle.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 02:40 AM
1

nobody is preying on his downfall lol
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 02:39 AM
2

I hate to break it to you, but you are an average American. Literally OP
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 09:59 PM
2

you cult of work types Ah, so you've already moved to the "making shit up" stage with me. That was fast. I really don't care if you feel insulted. Everything I said if perfectly accurate. You're not smart, deep, or insightful. You just parrot shit that you read online and you're online all day. Sorry that hurts your feelings. Here, let's do this: Show me some popular posts/comments here that claim that consuming products can replace bonds of love and companionship with other people. edit: Yep, t…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 08:51 PM
1

lol @ you thinking you're offering deep insight and analysis into "western"/"yankee" society. You're literally just regurgitating talking points and memes you've gleaned from subs like /antiwork and /LateStageCapitalism lol. embarassing
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 08:40 PM
1

I'm afraid there just isn't much here. Identifying specific slogans that are overused, wildly inaccurate, or just plain cringey is pretty obviously not an attack on rhetoric in general. Plenty of rhetoric has nothing at all to do with shallow platitudes. So that charge is not just incorrect—it's fairly bizarre. I certainly did not claim that "everyone" who uses those expressions is stupid. So you're either not reading carefully or intentionally misrepresenting me. My beef is with the overuse and…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 04:45 AM
1

I dont think it totally destroys and owns the chuds Yeah you do, which is why you were incensed by my comment and are valiantly trying to defend your cherished platitude. It's a dumb thing to say and no serious person parrots it. And since you mentioned it, "projection" is another term that is completely overused by very stupid people. There's usually no evidence at all that the one being accused of projection is actually projecting. It's just another way of saying "I know you are but what am I?…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 10:13 PM
1

but I also think its true more often than it should be Sure, but that's because you're not very bright. It's in fact rarely the case that every accusation is a confession. At best, a tiny fraction of accusations is anything like a confession. But silly, hysterical people such as yourself like to repeat it because you feel like it has a lot of cachet and totally destroys and owns the chuds. Goofball.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 08:44 PM
–

Oooh! Found another one. I bet you think calling someone a "grifter" is the ultimate, irrefutable argument 😂 Seriously though, it's shocking how many people think that "every accusation is a confession" is some devastating "own."
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 08:16 AM
–

Every accusation and argument is a confession Dear god. You guys really need to retire this cringey slogan.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/23 09:59 PM
1

I don't understand this reply. I would expect that the comments in any context regarding romance, dating, etc. would be generalized to the class of people a person is interested in/attracted to. Isn't that just assumed and normal across the board? I mean, when gay men complain "why do men do such and such??" do they have literally all men in mind, or specifically the men that they're interested in and have dealt with in a dating context?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 07:20 PM
2

I think you mean "dysphoria"
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/23 07:08 PM
1

An overweight woman can post a video about crafting and men in her comments are mocking how 'fat' she is. A short man posting his crafting and nobody says a word on how short he is. That's a silly comparison; it's hard to tell how tall a person is in a video. You want to go compare?? I doubt this was in good faith, but this sounds like fun. You post a tiktok video of a man making fun of fat women, and I'll post a video of a women making fun of short men. We'll keep going the tally up which video…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/23 04:36 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter