TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

yikesmysexlife Archive

View 0 posts and 70 comments by yikesmysexlife on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

You’re still treating “feminism” as a single actor with unified control over legislation, international law, academic models, and advocacy priorities across decades. That’s doing a lot of work for your argument. On the draft: opposing adding women to the draft doesn’t logically require leading the charge to abolish the draft entirely, especially when abolition has never been politically viable in the U.S. You can think that’s insufficient or disappointing, but it’s not evidence of bad faith or s…
/r/MensRights03/01/26 12:36 AM
0

I think you’re collapsing a lot of different actors and moments into “feminists” and then treating the outcome you didn’t like as proof of bad faith. On the draft example: the immediate issue was whether women would be added to Selective Service. Once that bill failed, there wasn’t a live legislative vehicle to abolish the draft entirely. You can disagree with the slogans or think they should have pushed harder afterward, but that doesn’t mean they secretly support drafting men. It means the spe…
/r/MensRights02/01/26 08:33 PM
-6

If I’m understanding you right, your argument isn’t that feminists think male circumcision is harmless, but that they’re hypocritical for calling feminism a movement for everyone while not putting the same energy into fighting an issue that primarily affects men. Is that the actual claim you’re making? Because that’s a criticism about priorities and advocacy choices, not evidence that feminists deny harm or promote circumcision. Those are very different arguments. I think this is where the disco…
/r/MensRights02/01/26 02:26 PM
-10

This is a goalpost shift. The original claim was that feminists “push the myth” that male circumcision is harmless. That’s generally not true. Many feminist frameworks explicitly criticize non-therapeutic infant circumcision on bodily autonomy and consent grounds. The fact that feminist advocacy around FGM went further and took a different legal path doesn’t mean feminists believe male circumcision is harmless or acceptable. FGM was already illegal in many jurisdictions, lacked medical legitimiz…
/r/MensRights02/01/26 04:26 AM
-9

I'm curious where you see feminists pushing this idea? Mainstream feminist perspectives explicitly challenge the idea that non-therapeutic infant male circumcision is harmless. The focus is on bodily autonomy, consent, and children’s rights: an infant cannot consent to irreversible surgery on healthy genital tissue. Feminist critiques also highlights the gendered ethical inconsistency—society condemns non-consensual genital cutting of girls while normalizing it for boys—arguing that the underlyi…
/r/MensRights02/01/26 02:10 AM
-3

Because Kristin Cabot was divorced, and had been for years at the time of the incident, and Andy Byron was married. You can claim that someone shouldn't get involved with a married person and I would agree, but the married person bears primary responsibility to say "thank you but no, I'm married." He is also in a senior position. He was a CEO and Cabot is head of HR. Byron is a higher profile individual and his downfall is more compelling.
/r/MensRights20/07/25 05:09 PM
2

Disagree. I do all the laundry and all the home repairs in my household, and there is no comparing a good set of tools to an iron. I use my tools for repair jobs, but also for personal projects-- and I enjoy both. Ironing just needs to get done. There's not much skill involved, and a $25 iron works about as well as a $75 one.
/r/MensRights25/01/22 10:01 PM
7

wow and here I thought all my friends who wanted kids waited until their 30s because of astronomically high living expenses, crippling education and or medical debt, and a piss poor labor market with no protections and stagnant wages. but no, I guess it was adult men who enjoy video games. 🤷🏻‍♂️
/r/MensRights06/02/21 02:31 AM
2

it just means you are a man, without also implying that trans men are not "real" men. it literally just means that your gender identity and presentation are the same.
/r/MensRights10/03/19 06:52 AM
3

sot of?? having BDE does not require the BD. in a society were everything is inevitably hypothesized to be about penis size in one way or another, I think it's a pretty concise shorthand for acting calmly self-assured.
/r/MensRights31/07/18 05:33 PM
2

there are literally dozens of articles available from major publishers about men talking boob size preferrence available right now and no one is burning a bra about it. edited to include examples: Jezebel- Men Discuss the Bust Psychology Today- What is it About Men and Breast Size? Maxim- Perfect Breast Size (not linked because a bot will remove this comment) lots more articles and videos, seemingly going unflagged by feminists. the thing is, I dont really think anyone cares what kind of breast …
/r/MensRights27/07/18 05:15 PM
2

like this?
/r/MensRights27/07/18 05:08 PM
10

is "benevolent sexism" also known as being kind to people you would like to date?
/r/MensRights19/07/18 07:07 AM
1

I am a feminist, and I do not argue with this point. It's not that masculinity is innately toxic. a present, stable, loving dad makes a world of difference. when people talk about "toxic masculinity" (with the exception of those who are themselves dealing with trauma, and perhaps protecting a nuanced experience onto 'MEN/masulinity' more generally) they are referring to masculine gatekeeping, as in 'men don't need anyone else/never ask for help', 'real men don't discuss feelings', 'men are alway…
/r/MensRights27/06/18 09:28 PM
1

I would rather have had someone sharing in the housework and earned money an extra 3 hours a day, then I could have done the improvements without asking permission and making a case for repainting the conchshell-pink bathroom.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 09:59 PM
0

I've taken care of a household. it's just work. 6 hours a day, every day, to keep on top of everything, in that case. most of my "extravagences" were just making the home I was attached too for so much of the time a nice place to be.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 09:56 PM
0

if men are making the same amount with fewer hours worked, why not share in unpayed domestic work?
/r/MensRights13/05/18 09:48 PM
-2

great! they can use that extra time to do laundry, care for aging parents, pick up groceries and shuttle the kids around.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 06:29 PM
1

it's a fine idea...?
/r/MensRights18/04/18 10:17 PM
2

... the only person I know that is raising another person's kid is my cousin, and he's 20 and looks like a young Tom Brady (and that baby is the center of his universe.) stop pretending that women in or approaching their 30s are dried out whores.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 08:56 PM
2

huh.. I don't know what to tell you then? most of my friends growing up, and all of the ones I'm still close with, were lovely nerd boys. now that we're almost 30-mid 30s, they are all either married, engaged, in LTRs, or get dates when they feel like it. can I ask if you do anything that a partner might like to do with you? cooking, dance, stand up, backpacking, hiking, etc?
/r/MensRights18/04/18 04:03 PM
5

are you very young? when you get to be ~30 unmarried, steadily employed, relatively emotionally available men with dadbods and no kids get to be a real catch. (helps if you're also fun to be around, obv.)
/r/MensRights18/04/18 03:42 PM
1

So, it seems to me that what is actually going to change this attitude is a groundswell of men who feel violated by an intoxicated sexual encounter/violation they did not or could not consent to writing about it, coming forward, or where appropriate, bringing charges against whomever sexually assaulted them or facilitated the assault. Of the women I know who have 'caused a scene's knot let sexual transgressions that fucked them up slide) not one of them had an easy time, but at least there was a…
/r/MensRights22/06/17 02:51 AM
2

*lock-jaw, rather
/r/MensRights20/06/17 07:31 PM
6

It's not ok. Cutting off foreskin is defended by men and women alike for a number of reasons, like religion, hygiene, and by far the creepiest-- aesthetics/wanting them to "match their dad" (seriously wft.) The explanation that makes the most sense to me is cognitive dissonance theory-- if it's a horrible thing, then a horrible thing was done to me by people I love, and since I don't want to confront that, it must not be that horrible. Like tribes in New Guinea that extract a number of adult tee…
/r/MensRights20/06/17 07:30 PM
1

I think my wife would be ok if I shut her down whenever she opened her mouth about military service (although she's more actively into enlistment equality than any guys I know IRL) if in exchange only those with a fertile womb were aloud to have an opinion on abortion/reproductive health access.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 11:49 AM
4

That's wonderful! I'm genuinely glad that this worked out for you. was it an esthetic decision, or was it done to treat a condition? If the former, great! it's your body and i's wonderful that your decisions are working well for you. if it was done to correct a problem, I have no doubt you do like it more-- most healthy men don't elect to have their dick altered if it's working well for them. again-- that's great. there are times when surgically removing part of all of a foreskin (or clitoral ho…
/r/MensRights06/02/17 09:32 PM
1

also that doesn't really answer my question; if you are not married to or have children with someone, WHY ON EARTH would you not end a relationship you are unhappy in?
/r/MensRights05/01/17 10:01 PM
1

I suppose I'm lucky in that my GF is super supportive and mutual appreciation is a huge part of our relationship... I kind of can't imagine dating her if I wasn't actively excited to hang out with her and merge our lives.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 09:57 PM
9

I'm probably not going to seek another relationship after this one finally admits that it's dead. Why are you with someone you would say that about? Sounds like it's already over to you, so why not admit that and begin single life?
/r/MensRights03/01/17 01:53 AM
-7

Assuming that the party that was deceived is innocent rather than assuming women to be victims is a Feminist position. To assume that the woman is automatically the victim is to say that women inherently lack agency, or that men are not able to resist opportunities to prey on them. That's patriarchy, hurting everyone.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 11:52 PM
1

from the linked to wikipedia entry: It is extremely difficult to assess the prevalence of false accusations. Not all jurisdictions have a distinct classification of false accusation, resulting in these cases being combined with other types of cases (e.g. where the accuser did not physically resist the suspect or sustain injuries) under headings such as "unfounded" or "unproved". There are many reasons other than falsity that can result in a rape case being closed as unfounded or unproven.[1][2] …
/r/MensRights04/08/16 12:08 AM
1

yeah... I tend to think it's less that a man who doesn't work is less attractive, but one who values himself less because he doesn't work is. there is a lot of identity tied to the work someone does, in the states you basically only ever hear "no one should live in poverty" when it's immediately followed by "when they're working 40 hours a week." I think its BS, but it's true. being out of work for me was more stressful than any job.
/r/MensRights01/08/16 07:10 AM
1

why should people who are unhappy in their marriage continue to be married? if someone is so great, why would they want someone who doesn't appreciate them to stay married to them? men leaving marriages despite the best effort of their spouses isn't exactly unheard of.
/r/MensRights01/08/16 07:04 AM
1

very self serving indeed.
/r/MensRights01/08/16 07:00 AM
1

many men have no idea how to do any of those things.
/r/MensRights01/08/16 06:59 AM
1

I'm glad you have never heard of this happening. in one case, I heard it from the (now) ex wife, but she ultimately had to file a restraining order on him after he broke into her house and threw her computer out a window. in the other case, I have been and still am friends with both of them. he wasn't a dick or anything, he was unemployed for like a year and just stopped looking. he got super depressed, stopped doing stuff with the kids, stopped taking care of himself, became really angry and pa…
/r/MensRights01/08/16 06:55 AM
1

that's pretty sexist. I am a woman and I can fix basic plumbing, and do most of the home repairs (the ones I don't do are done by professionals) despite living with two very decent men who are no less men because they don't know their way around power tools.
/r/MensRights01/08/16 06:39 AM
12

I would respect this article more if it covered the mens contribution to home making as well as their lack of employment. although it's purely anecdotal, of the two couples I know personally who divorced because the men didn't work, both the women were still doing the lion's share of housework and childcare despite working 40+ hours a week.
/r/MensRights28/07/16 07:43 PM
1

exactly. as someone else here summed up perfectly; It's an irreversible decision either way.
/r/MensRights28/07/16 04:34 PM
1

I have been assuming because it's a lesbian couple and the majority here like the narrative of evil women forcing their adopted /son/ into a life of womanhood.
/r/MensRights28/07/16 04:28 PM
1

I'm referring to the case of the boy who suffered a botched circumcision so his parents decided he'd have a better life as a girl. the results were tragic. that case was brought up earlier in the thread to illustrate, I believe, how terrible transitioning a child could be, and I was arguing that that case was not only ENTIRELY different, but actually pretty damning of the premise of this post (and if that's not clear enough, I fully support the decisions of the couple, and find the idea that it'…
/r/MensRights28/07/16 04:23 PM
-6

I'm going to assume you are referring to the bit I said about gender neutrality. I'll put it this way-- if you saw an 8 year old with buzzed hair and androgynous clothing, you would have a difficult time assessing that child's gender/sex. from that pre-developed state, someone born male has a better shot at transitioning to female, and "passing" as someone who was born that way. as much as it shouldn't matter whether a trans person passes or not, the fact is it ends up mattering a lot for their …
/r/MensRights24/07/16 11:16 PM
7

this is an important story in this context because it involves transitioning a little boy, who probably, like most boys, did not identify as a girl. the decision to transition him was made without is knowledge or consent. living with the dysphoria of feeling "in the wrong body", and the fact that his parents deceived and drugged him his whole life lead to neurosis and depression. the dual morals of the story? don't circumcise your boys, and don't force children to be a sex/gender they are not in…
/r/MensRights24/07/16 11:04 PM
-2

this is the most important comment here.
/r/MensRights24/07/16 10:51 PM
-5

If you're going for the full experience of being a woman, a 25% chance of not being able to reach orgasm seems about right. The whole point of delaying puberty is so that the penis and secondary masculine characteristics that are difficult and expensive to feminize once they've manifested. Chemically delaying puberty leads to more successful transitions, and also buys the kids an extra few months or years to think about the decision that they are making. I understand the desire to have the child…
/r/MensRights24/07/16 10:44 PM
3

words evolve to mean what they are used to refer to. look up the definition of literally to see my point.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 04:33 PM
-12

I am a feminist and my #1 cause is abolishing the practice of circumcision on infant boys. Granted there are what we affectionally refer to as "white feminists", who narrowly focus on women's issues primarily affecting women/women of privilege while ignoring the voices of minorities, as well as female chauvinists who just straight up don't like men who identify as feminist. there are also rapists who use the mantle of feminism to get away with a lot of shitty behavior. on the whole, (intersectio…
/r/MensRights22/02/16 04:28 PM
-1

Feminism is probably the only force working to correct issues like this. If women were perceived as equals, the law would not assume they were helpless without the support of the spouse that is leaving them, and has more to do with how convoluted and corrupt our family court system is than any feminist idea. Feminists may be silent about false rape accusations, but read acomments on any story about a man being assaulted by someone of any sex and you will find feminists insisting it is no less de…
/r/MensRights18/11/15 03:48 PM
0

Yes every movement has people within it who argue in bad faith. It's a free for all out there, man, life churns out a lot of broken people. To bring them up distracts from actual discussion-- Point out the especially juicy morsels when they happen and move on.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 05:40 AM
1

Eh. There are a lot of systemic ways in which women are made to view themselves, and accept being treated as less than a full person, and with less force comes less responsibility (not that I agree, but for that reason I feel relatively forgiving of some of the neurosis Feminism often attracts). If you encounter a situation in which women are being treated preferentially, ask yourself if it is because of a perception that women are lesser and must be protected? Are they being treated like a reso…
/r/MensRights31/10/14 05:29 AM
12

hey, Feminist here-- I agree with a lot of what's being said ITT. The case should not be looked at differently because the teacher is female or attractive. At best, her behavior was extremely inappropriate and she should lose her job, at worst it was predatory and she should go to prison. I've gotten into a lot of arguments about this case, mostly with 30+ y/o men, common arguments being a) since I've never been a teenage boy myself, I couldn't possibly understand, and b) "maybe if she was 300 l…
/r/MensRights30/10/14 04:02 PM
1

or at least have whatever body type they do without being seen as less than women. lucky, lucky women.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 04:18 PM
2

one is about looks and one about character. it's all crap either way, but drawing a comparison would hold more weight if the A REAL WOMAN... sign had a list of generally-accepted-as-psoitive-and-productive character traits then had them crossed off with "whatever she wants" written in, or if the A REAL MAN... list was a list of acceptable/desirable body types.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 04:03 PM
1

no, nor have I heard men being told to man up for not putting the needs of random men or women above their own. I would like examples, if you have some in mind.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 03:33 PM
2

I'm not sure what you are talking about when you talk about men being expected to serve others, beyond normal social politeness. are you talking about supporting a family? serving in the military?
/r/MensRights25/08/14 11:45 AM
-5

here is a study of adult men who were circumsized as part of a study to test the effectiveness of circumcision against contracting HIV, and their self reported sexual satisfaction, but I am not defending circumcision. I don't condone the practice, I don't think it benefits anyone, and I think there are probably lasting physical and psychological effects of performing such surgeries on babies. I do not see a need to site evidence when I say that most of the men I know are circumcised (because tha…
/r/MensRights25/08/14 04:40 AM
3

clitoral hood removal and foreskin removal do in fact register as the same level of awful, and if that is truly the extent of mutilation we are discussing, I accept your point and agree that they are the same thing.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 04:07 AM
1

not really. it's pretty well accepted by people who are not either sociopaths or lacking in basic understanding of what life is like that tricking someone into parenthood is a terrible idea for everyone involved. like.. there are some biddies out there that think getting knocked up is some magical shortcut to happily ever after, but obviously the same can be said about Jose's friends.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 03:45 AM
-5

I am anti-circumcision, but I draw the line at saying it is as bad as female circumcision. I live in the US where most adult men are cut. politics and practices aside, men don't seem to spare a ton of thought for their lost foreskin, and they can enjoy a healthy, pleasurable sex life. I think cutting pieces of genitals off of ANYONE who can't or hasn't consented is reprehensible, but FMG is its own category of horror, and I don't think it needs to be invoked to have a discussion about ending the…
/r/MensRights25/08/14 03:32 AM
9

that's great to hear. still, this particular girl needs to know that this shit is not ok, and should be made to deal with some vey real consequences from terrifyingly real authorities. AND to start a record in case this is a pattern for her, as people who get physical tend to get physical again. if not for you (but c'mon, do it for you), report her for the next person she might feel deserves to be attacked.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 03:16 AM
2

I agree with you that many of the commonly held beliefs about what it is to be a man are problematic, especially where they deal with self care (for example, avoiding risk, seeking treatment for injuries, eating sensibly, and talking about things/expressing emotions are considered un-masculine.) I do not support this. it simply cannot be said that women don't have an expectation of service placed on them. women are expected to cater to the needs of others, are socialized to defer to men in conve…
/r/MensRights25/08/14 03:06 AM
1

he's said that women, by definition, take things personally and negatively, are highly misandric, and if you know a woman who is an exception that's only because she hasn't shown her true colors. that is not 'real phenomena', that is a bigoted and needlessly antagonizing to women. there are toxic, abusive, narcissistic, unreasonable women, and occasionally you will encounter them. the same can be said of every group or category of people that that has ever existed. however, allowing an interacti…
/r/MensRights24/08/14 11:07 PM
6

an actual friend tells you you're wrong when you're wrong, with tact equal to the quality of the relationship. actual friendship can survive debates and disagreements. surrounding one's self with echos is dangerous and stifling.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 08:06 PM
11

I hear being antagonizing and dismissive towards entire categories of peoples is an effective way to find common ground and have your arguments taken seriously.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 08:02 PM
-1

I think you've drawn a false equivalent here... Sex dolls... I mean, I don't really care what people have sex with so long as it's not against one prties will, but there is something eery about a whole female form that's kept around to fuck. I mean... yeah, you don't see anyone getting worked up about dildos, but neither do you see anyone railing against flesh-lights which I think are more comparable than sex dolls.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 12:37 AM
1

I read this article expecting to hate it, and actually found that once I got past comparing men to puppies there is some decent advice. I'd rather date someone who communicates effectively what they want, rewards/appreciates when I do things that 'ad value to the relationshp', sets firm boundaries, and can entertain themselves when I want to do my own thing than someone who is a clinging push over until they explode out of nowhere. as I said, comparing men to puppies is off-putting, but I think …
/r/MensRights01/08/14 02:45 AM
-2

not so. Feminism doesn't call for mass castration, lunatic outliers do. Feminism seeks to establish all people being valued and treated with the same respect, whether they are male, female, trans, gay, queer, able-bodied, disabled, of color, struggling with mental health issues, etc, etc, etc. I am a feminist because I am not comfortable with the fact that a white, cis-gendered, able-bodied male is considered "normal", and everyone else is otherized.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 05:33 PM
-3

eh. It's just too easy to hate on Feminists, and the knee-jerk reaction of most people to someone who's outed themselves as Feminist is ATAAACK ITTTT. Most Feminists are perfectly lovely people who care deeply about addressing and changing wonton cruelty, unfair practices and harassment, but they are not the ones who wear it like a badge, proselytizing, dancing around their moral high ground, and egging people into 0 gain arguments. You can't stop assholes finding excuses to be assholes.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 05:31 PM
7

not all Feminists are like that ^
/r/MensRights23/02/14 11:09 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter