| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Do you have any realistic ideas on how to solve the rising male loneliness problem?Yes, self love and confidence is what is making guys getting laid and others 1000 lies you can tell to yourself | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/02/22 02:36 AM |
| 1 | Do you have any realistic ideas on how to solve the rising male loneliness problem?Good plastic surgeries. That's all. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/02/22 11:12 PM |
| 1 | Alpha/beta/sigma is just astrology for straight men.I really don't care as much as you care about how people are using words. If they're using it wrongly I just ignore them or at maximum I correct them. Anyway, as I said earlier: you can exchange these words (alpha, beta, omega etc) for anything else if you want or if you prefer once people are supposedly using them wrongly. You can change the word alpha for the word better or superior for example. And beta for worst or inferior. Just an example. The fact is that hierarchies will exists regardles… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/01/22 05:45 PM |
| 1 | Alpha/beta/sigma is just astrology for straight men.It doesn't assume. I have always read that alpha, beta, sigma, omega and so on are all relative. A beta in the X situation can be an alpha in the Y situation for example. That's how I learned this classification when I was younger. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/01/22 05:38 PM |
| 1 | Alpha/beta/sigma is just astrology for straight men.What's the problem of being situational? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/01/22 05:27 PM |
| 1 | Alpha/beta/sigma is just astrology for straight men.There's no hierarchy when there are no names for every single agent in the hierarchy, right? I mean, of course this stuff about someone being better at something than others is false because it would only be true if there was a name for every single one of the 8 billion humans on earth, right? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/01/22 01:26 PM |
| 2 | A guy doesn't have to be handsome to be sexually attractiveWhat do you want? If we don't generalize people when talking about people, what the hell do you want? To take 8 billion humans and speak slowly about every single each one of them? No way. That's why stuff like "part of", "most of" and so on exists. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/01/22 12:57 PM |
| 1 | Men who plan to marry in their 40s are ruining the dating marketIsn't it just women not marrying these men then? The solution seems simple to me. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/01/22 09:56 PM |
| 2 | Q4W would you date a man who earns less than you?Based girl | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/01/22 03:03 AM |
| 1 | Alpha/beta/sigma is just astrology for straight men.If, and only if, are men getting laid and money more than others, then there's a hierarchy when it comes to getting laid and money. That's irrefutable. Now, people like to give names to things. That's not my problem. The names can be problematic, I don't care, don't care about the names at all. The fact is that hierarchies do exists. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/01/22 04:39 PM |
| 3 | Most of what women here consider "unrealistic porn sex" is just passionate sex, they just aren't passionate about their boyfriendsFrom the most beautiful men I know, I have never heard them complaining about their women don't doing "all the stuff" in the sex. Because they do. Everyone I heard complaining about it are average or ugly men. For me, it says a lot. It says that women have no problem doing "sick porn stuff" with what is called "alpha males", but they do have a lot of problems with it when it comes to what is called "beta males". | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/01/22 08:52 PM |
| 1 | [Q4M] Why do manosphere men have such an aversion to being a stepfather?Personally, I wanna have 1 biological child. But I don't wanna have to take care of more than 1. So, if the woman already has 1, it's over. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/12/21 09:49 PM |
| 3 | Based on my experience women don't seem to value "intelligence" as an attractive traitI agree. Neither men, by the way. I have never seen someone valuing intelligence as an attractive trait. All of my professors were intelligent people, but the girls would only talk about the handsome ones, lol. Coincidence? And as I said, men do not see intelligence as attractive too. You always see girls playing dumb, and talking about it with each other, because (according to them) that's the way men prefer (and I agree). | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/12/21 05:54 PM |
| 4 | PPD: When did you lose your Virginity?25M. I didn't. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/12/21 02:21 PM |
| 1 | What are your standards in a partner?younger than me. she have to be into anime. I have to find her beautiful and intelligent. Anything else is negotiable for me (weigh, height, college degree, job, friends and so on). | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/12/21 02:19 PM |
| 2 | Women routinely 'rule out' men that aren't at least 6 feet tall. Here is a map showing the mean height of adult men worldwide. Note: 6 feet = 183 cm.Yes, it's all about personality, like the Jeremy Meeks case. | /r/MensRights | 10/12/21 07:50 PM |
| 2 | Why is it wrong to prefer to have traditional gender roles?It's not wrong. They try to make you think it is, but it is not. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/11/21 12:33 PM |
| 1 | CMV: Men who don’t want promiscuous women shouldn’t be seen as “misogynistic” or “slut shaming”.Coping. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/11/21 02:06 PM |
| 7 | If all women are attracted to a similar type of man physically...what type of personality appeals to the broadest amount of women?Dominance. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/11/21 08:53 PM |
| 2 | If high n count men are hypocritical for wanting low n count women - does the same apply to wealth preferences in women?Do you live in a cavern? How can someone in 21st century never heard virgin as an insult? Lol, no. Edit: ok, you're from Russia. I don't know how different is east from west in this topic. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/11/21 03:50 PM |
| 1 | If high n count men are hypocritical for wanting low n count women - does the same apply to wealth preferences in women?Why is perfectly fine for women to want a very experienced men, but it's somehow hypocrisy for men to want non very experienced women? It's kinda gynocentric. I mean, why what women want is ok but what men want is not ok? And it's not even only about n-counts. It's about almost everything in our society (but specially on sexual/romantic topics). | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/11/21 03:49 PM |
| 1 | CMV: Men who don’t want promiscuous women shouldn’t be seen as “misogynistic” or “slut shaming”.Yes. And by the general society point of view, a man who have no ability to "flirt and talk game" with women are losers. That's what I meant. I don't think we guys are losers, sex isn't everything in life. But society as a whole do think we're losers. That is. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/11/21 01:42 PM |
| 1 | CMV: Men who don’t want promiscuous women shouldn’t be seen as “misogynistic” or “slut shaming”.I don't know how true it's usual for teenagers to have multiple dates in a relatively short period of time. Most of my friends (24 years old) are with their first or second girlfriends until today, who they met when they were teenagers, at school. Most of my brother's friends, on the other hand, fit better in what you described. It's very relative, it depends on the context, the social circle you are into, even the region you live in and so on. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/11/21 01:39 PM |
| 9 | CMV: Men who don’t want promiscuous women shouldn’t be seen as “misogynistic” or “slut shaming”.Having 5 boyfriends in a period of 5 years is not promiscuous, it's just a redflag anyway. Not as bad as promiscuity, but still bad. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/11/21 05:08 AM |
| 6 | CMV: Men who don’t want promiscuous women shouldn’t be seen as “misogynistic” or “slut shaming”.I have to agree. I'm also a 24 virgin and literally all virgin women I ever knew was into non-virgin men. These women actually think virgin men are losers (which is usually true, because most of male virgins aren't voluntarily virgins, I bet). | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/11/21 05:06 AM |
| 1 | What's the hardest you have ever seen a women Simp for a guy she wasn't seeing/dating?I didn't say that (although some people did). What I said was: women doesn't accept almost anything like men does. There's even a name for this phenomenon. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/11/21 04:57 AM |
| 1 | Incels just play the victimI don't get the part of "their own kind". It's like ugly people dating ugly people and beautiful people dating beautiful people? | /r/ExRedPill | 17/11/21 04:43 AM |
| -1 | What's the hardest you have ever seen a women Simp for a guy she wasn't seeing/dating?They do it all the time to get Chad's attention. Men do it all the time to get any women's attention. That's the disparity: there are more women out there than Chads. That make it looks like women don't simp. Lol, no. They simp a lot, it's just that they have standards so they simp to the 1% top male while men accepts anything and simp to anyone who is (or at least looks like) a woman. Lmao. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/11/21 08:19 PM |
| 2 | Despite TRPers desperately wanting it to be true science shows that women aren't attracted to dark triad men.Lol, no. That's literally the argument in the post "women don't like them, women just like how they are and how they act and how they do stuff, lmao" basically. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/11/21 03:42 AM |
| 2 | Online dating and modern hookup culture is not just a zero-sum game, it's a negative-sum gameYes, it is. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/11/21 10:55 AM |
| 9 | Despite TRPers desperately wanting it to be true science shows that women aren't attracted to dark triad men.Basically the "Women don't actually like psychopaths. Women just like the way they think, they do things, they say things, how they dress themselves and so on" argument. It's a good argument btw many idiots can be convinced. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/11/21 10:45 AM |
| 2 | How important is it for your spouse to be a virgin?A 101%. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/11/21 04:30 AM |
| 2 | Question For The Men: Would you date or marry or even consider a relationship with an FDS woman?No. They only want rich men, they use a lot of euphemisms for wanting only the riches, and I'm not rich therefore it would be hell for me. No way. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/11/21 04:27 AM |
| 3 | There is no 100% PC Way of Approaching Women Without Risking to Appear CREEPYIf you're not handsome af, you have to be a dumbass to approach woman because you know how things can get hard and dangerous in a lot of possible ways. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/08/21 11:36 PM |
| 10 | Men should have a hoe phase before committing to anyone.Of course I am. I just edited my comment. And I think it's ridiculous when a man is not a virgin, or worse: he's a douchebag, a bon vivant, and even so he says he wants a virgin because he doesn't like "hoes" (being he a hoe himself lol). Ridiculous, just it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/07/21 06:22 PM |
| 22 | Men should have a hoe phase before committing to anyone.Nah, I prefer to die alone than commit to a non-virgin. Yes, I will probably die without one, but I don't care. As I said: I prefer this way. No way I'm gonna commit to a woman who have had sex while I have not lmao | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/07/21 01:29 PM |
| 1 | OLD studies contain the most objective data we've ever had on the effect of looks on dating, so people are right to hold those studies in high regardAt least in the USA, in mid-2013, was said that "more than 1/3 of U.S. marriages begin with online dating, and those couples may be slightly happier than couples who meet through other means" (source). By 2019, "meeting online has become the most popular way U.S. couples connect, Stanford sociologist finds" (source). Therefore, if someone is saying that online dating is not valid, that it cannot be taken seriously, just ignore them. Because they're ignoring facts, so you can ignore them. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/07/21 02:38 PM |
| 1 | UK: Students at two London universities are warned they need 'explicit verbal consent' before hugging or patting anyone on the back inside their union under strict 'safe space' policiesOf course. Now, look, where I live (Brazil) is ridiculously usual to touch people, to hug, to pat and so on. But there's a socially acceptable list of what is supposed to be freely touched. Shoulders, for example, is only acceptable for men-men touches. To touch hips and waist is not socially acceptable (regardless of gender). What I meant was: if you're touching people INSIDE of what is considered "normal" and acceptable within your culture, that's absolutely ok. But if it is not, it's better t… | /r/MensRights | 28/06/21 04:18 PM |
| 1 | Hygiene argument.I'm from Brazil, we don't have a lot of Jews here. But I thought that in Anglophone world, only the Jews were circumcised. Isn't? | /r/MensRights | 28/06/21 11:27 AM |
| 13 | UK: Students at two London universities are warned they need 'explicit verbal consent' before hugging or patting anyone on the back inside their union under strict 'safe space' policiesShouldn't be warned. They must have known beforehand. Since I was a child, I never understood where men get the courage to touch girls. It ALWAYS ended badly, except on the rare occasions when the toucher was veeery handsome. | /r/MensRights | 28/06/21 11:19 AM |
| -1 | In fact men are more likely to be victims of a violent crime.Why is it so hard to fight for men's rights and at the same time accept that women are more fearful than we are? Not everything is a competition, fellas. | /r/MensRights | 28/06/21 11:14 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter