TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

yolo_swag_tyme Archive

View 0 posts and 38 comments by yolo_swag_tyme on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

I think it should be capped at a reasonable amount of money required to raise a child. None of this $100,000 a month because he’s a millionaire. It should be based on income but capped at like $1000/m. If the guys rich and the kid wants to go to university then he can pay that directly too.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 02:42 PM
2

Dude you need to stop focusing on gender double standards, and not seeing all women as "the other". Just live your life. Dress and act however you want, there are dick heads out there who may try to tear you down but if you're a good person, there are alot more people (both men and women) that pick you up. Building up this negative perception of all women and havinf this attitude is not going to serve you.
/r/MensRights27/08/22 12:50 AM
-1

Spousal support makes some sense if you think of a couple that marry young, the wife stays home and takes care of the kids, husband works his way up a company and becomes very wealthy. They divorce 30 years later, now the husband is at the peak of his career and wife has no marketable skills. I can see the argument that husband should maybe help her to make sure she can afford food and an apartment... But this should be capped at like $100,000 absolute max for the super rich. No reason anyone ha…
/r/MensRights23/07/21 01:03 AM
-7

Well what I meant was tell her to fuck off and keep her at arms length.. Don't even really have to "push" a girl you can just put your arm out and keep them off of you. I guess you never actually watched the Ray Rice video when he punched a girl in the face and knocked her out? Definitely not what I'm saying here....
/r/MensRights12/02/19 02:24 PM
-4

What he said is true. The difference is that if a girl comes on to a guy, if push comes to shove, 99% of the time the guy will be able to physically push the woman off and get out of the situation (assuming no weapons/drugging). But if you flip the situation the female 99% of the time will not be able to physically over power the man and be able to remove herself from the situation of the guy is persistant. So as a guy I don't have any fear if a girl comes up and kisses me out of the blue, but I…
/r/MensRights12/02/19 02:04 PM
1

A pedophile has sex with pre pubescant children. Women would not get away with that. Having sex with a young teenager is more tolerated in our society because our society is made up of people who used to be young teenagers who were either having sex or wanting to have sex. Boys (on average) tend to want to have sex at a younger age. Girls (on average) tend to the more selective and are more likely to wait until they either know their partner more or they are older. This is why we have a "double …
/r/MensRights05/08/18 12:08 PM
0

Just because it's usually bad if an adult has sex with a teenager, doesn't mean it's always bad. Many guys at 14 are sexually active. Without knowing the person and the circumstance we can't possible draw conclusions. Maybe the teenager came onto the teacher? Maybe the teacher coerced him into it. Maybe she was his first partner, maybe she was his 10th. Pretty safe to say she shouldn't be a teacher anymore because you should not be able to hook up with your students, but I don't necessarily thin…
/r/MensRights05/08/18 11:55 AM
1

I'm just here to say that not every time an older lady/teacher has sex with a student/teenager aged 15+ that it should be considered sexual assault. Sometimes everyone can be mature enough and enjoy the situation (sex is enjoyable, remember?). Obviously a teacher should lose her job - we don't need these people working in schools, but is jail really the right place? As long as there was no coersion I don't have a huge issue with it. You have to look at each situation individually. Same when it's…
/r/MensRights26/01/18 01:21 PM
3

Japan has women only sections on trains but I don't think it's really enforced. My friend and I (2 guys) noticed the women only signs were up in our tram when we were visiting Tokyo but noticed a few other men in there with us.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 12:55 PM
2

I would argue it should be allowed. If you're making a campaign to reduce gun violence in Detroit would you portray an old Asian lady? If you're an sjw you might, but if you're a reasonable person you would not.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 06:36 PM
0

What percentage of total sexual assaults on minors (including those never reported/discovered) would you guess are perpetrated by women? I would guess no more than 15 percent.. Probably way less. What do you think?
/r/MensRights17/09/17 04:47 PM
1

Men, by far, commit th to the vast majority or sexual assaults on children. In Germany and Austria, over the past few years, there has been a large increase in these assaults due to mass migration. It would be silly to target women in a short commercial because they sometimes commit these crimes as well (I would speculate less than 10 percent of the time?). The reality of the situation is that it's typically men. And it's not like it is saying it is all men.. It specifically says they are differ…
/r/MensRights17/09/17 12:35 PM
15

Lol I hope your kidding. This girl caused 0 trauma to anybody. She's a nuisance, that's all. Don't try to rope this in like molested someone. Waste of everyone's time to put her in jail... Maybe a fine and ban her from the stadium. Maybe if she grabbed their dicks the guys may have felt violated... But grabbing their ass I don't think is that big of a deal. Yes its a it of a double standard but men and women are different.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 08:48 PM
2

Lol yes they're raped by other men dummy so this tweet is still relevant. I agree women raping men does happen, but it's not an "issue" we need to devote lots of time and resources to. Ps I'm a male who hates modern feminism.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 12:59 PM
2

I think the term rape should be reserved for situations where sex is forced upon an unconcenting party. The damage done to that party emotionally is far greater than when it is two consenting individuals, but one is a pre teen or teenager and one is an adult. Should sex between consenting adults and pre teens be illegal? Absolutely. Especially with a teacher and student. This should obv be true regardless of gender. But to call it rape? The same as someone being held down with a knife to their t…
/r/MensRights04/06/16 05:13 PM
1

I disagree. I believe some charity is better than no charity. We just disagree on this one principle that I don't think everyone should always be treated equally in every situation. Also Canadian public would not be on board if we accepted everyone equally.
/r/MensRights20/12/15 01:47 AM
-1

Well that's where we disagree. I think using 'discrimination' to keep the citizens safe is valid.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 07:40 PM
-2

You're not wrong saying that letting in any Muslims has the potential to result in terrorist attack, I just don't think this should be made into a gender issue. The issue is that millions of people have become displaced. Canada has generously offered help to people in the area. Canada has reasonably chosen to be cautious take in the least threatening demographic in hopes that this $100 million act of kindness not blow up in their face (literally). You're just looking for things to use the gender…
/r/MensRights19/12/15 06:26 PM
1

Is it fair to judge people based on race/age/gender/religion? No its not fair. Is it sometimes smart to judge people based on the above? Yes. It may not be politically correct to say so but deep down everyone knows that those 4 factors can allow you to make predictions about peoples attitudes and behaviours. Obviously not going to be 100 percent correct but still statistically valid.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 06:03 PM
-4

Lol I didn't say keep all Muslim men out. I said we should allow a subset of the population that is thought to be the least likely to carry out terrorim. Unfortunately yes it happens to be men in this case. Is that fair to the innocent men? No. But it's the best course of action. Remember this is all charity costing the Canadian tax payer $100 mil when already running a deficit. Don't make this into a gender issue it's.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 05:53 PM
-5

A huge majority of terrorists and the people who plan out terrorist attacks are men. Therefore, by prioritizing women and children, there is a smaller chance of allowing someone entry into the country who may carry out terrorism. It makes perfect sense to most people. But by using buzz words like 'discrimination' and 'racism' you stop seeing issues rationally. It's actually shocking that you were upvoted and Judean was downvoted.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 04:15 PM
11

What percentage of terrorist attacks would you say is carried out by women?
/r/MensRights19/12/15 02:33 PM
1

I totally agree with you. The system is skewed in all those situations which screws over men and allows women to lie and get away with it. But that has nothing to do with physical violence which is what this ad getting at.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 08:24 PM
3

Honest question here but I am prepared to be down voted into oblivion. Is there evidence that the female is as likely as the male to be the abuser in a relationship? Just from my own personal experience I've only ever heard of the male being the perpetrator. Also I'm a bigger guy so it's hard for me to imagine being abused by a girlfriend when I'm double their size. What am I missing here? Seems like this ad is appealing to the more common situation... While females can certainly be the abusers …
/r/MensRights30/09/15 12:23 PM
-4

Op your worse than a feminist. Looking for bs to get mad about. This has literally nothing to do with any gender issue.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 01:53 PM
3

So you think a male would deserve this sentence of tables were turned? The students were consenting, while the teacher should be fired and charged, 22 years is insane. How do u ever expect laws to become more fair I'd you celebrate crazy sentences like this...
/r/MensRights04/07/15 12:01 PM
0

So instead of realizing that stupid we should just also get outraged? The reality is that your American age of consent is ridiculous. The teacher shouldn't be doing this because it's a position of power but this kid is probably not going to have post traumatic stress over this like generally happens with real instances of rape
/r/MensRights21/01/15 04:01 AM
4

Dude when u say women need to stop raping us you sound just as unreasonable as extreme feminists. There's no reason to believe she even raped him... Just because it's the law since he's not 16 which is probably the age of consent for the area, it seems like he was into it. Just because u weren't ready to have sex at 15 doesn't mean this kid isn't. Locking her up is not a good use of taxpayer dollars.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 05:23 PM
5

every time i scroll by this topic i get excited because I think it says 77 cent wings
/r/MensRights09/04/14 01:22 AM
1

That survey is purposely misleading. It doesn't ask men if they were raped. It asks them if they were forced to have sex. This could be with a girl friend, wife, fwb... I would answer yes to it. But i would not say I've been raped. And it is totally different. I don't have flashbacks and panic attacks of when my gf came home drunk and mounted me when I was tired and didn't want to have sex, which generally women (or men, I'm thinking more I'm jail context) would for "real rape". In my case, and …
/r/MensRights04/04/14 02:41 PM
-1

its the same premise if you dont understand men and women are different. And good job on fighting a girl. Hope u won.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 10:04 AM
-1

Lol if u get a boner in a fight it might mean your gay. Normal straight men do not get boners during fights. LOL. I never said wet = consent or boner = consent. I'm saying during a rape you cant get a boner. If your coerced u prob can. Girls are different. Plz stop posting your ruining mens rights. ty
/r/MensRights04/04/14 09:32 AM
-1

Do u actually think im wrong? This guys retarded logic is worse than feminism. You don't want him on our side.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 07:03 AM
-2

When was the last time you got a boner when you were scared, and in fight or flight. When you have cortisol coursing through your blood, blood is shunted from organs where it is not needed (AKA the penis), to organs where it is needed AKA skeletal muscle and the heart. Why don't you take a university biology class. And stop with the 'if a women gets wet it's not rape.' That has nothing to do with this. You can rape a girl whether shes wet or not, you can't rape a guy who doesnt have a boner. You…
/r/MensRights03/04/14 07:59 PM
-1

OK thanks for the reply (and downvotes...). I didn't think about coercion, more just conventional rape. I still don't buy that a guy can have an erection when hes scared. Ya their involuntary when your sleeping or relaxed, not when your fighting off a women. I just still don't see the big deal in the textbook quote. Women just don't go around holding a gun to a guys head and saying fuck me, they can get laid much easier than men (men are generally less picky and OK with one night stands compared…
/r/MensRights03/04/14 07:47 PM
-21

Guys, seriously since when do girls commit rape? How would they even do it? It's nearly impossible for them to hold men down, and if they did, through all the struggle and fear and what not the guy would not have an boner. What am I missing?
/r/MensRights03/04/14 05:20 AM
1

Yep and who would work at McDonalds for minimum wage? You already have enough to get by why not sit around watching Maury all day. Everything would become more expensive because labor would become more expensive
/r/MensRights20/02/14 10:03 PM
2

Ya just grow the money on trees so it doesn't affect the debt.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 06:27 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter