| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | On a Via rail train and noticed that there are two bathrooms, one female only, and one unisex. Why?Being designed in the 1950's isn't an excuse, though. How many seconds does it take to remove the women's sign and replace it with a unisex sign? Actual gender equality would mean that men are viewed as capable of changing their kid. | /r/MensRights | 01/07/13 04:27 AM |
| 12 | A link to youtube comment that highlights double standard of borderline sexual abuse of a 6 year old boy is met with reddits top comment: Essentially "Yea but he likes it."I think it's safe to say... It isn't. You are not 90% of any gender. There is a difference between men and women... Yes, there is. ...there is a difference between how a 6 year old boy and a 6 year old girl would be effected affected... No, there is not. A 6 year old child's brain is not developed, regardless of their gender. They are not mature enough to understand what sexuality means. This is exactly as messed up as it would be the other way around. | /r/MensRights | 03/04/13 04:28 PM |
| 4 | As a female, I strongly and whole-heartedly support this subreddit and all that it stands for.Straight guy. Squealed. Theory checks out. | /r/MensRights | 19/02/13 07:08 PM |
| 1 | Anonymous post comparing RadFems to Radical Christians.It's true. A lot of us less-than-radicals believe both of those things, but stay out of people's faces about it. | /r/MensRights | 12/02/13 04:49 PM |
| 7 | Domestic violence against men: Know the signsWhat I got from this is that domestic violence looks EXACTLY THE SAME, regardless of the gender of the victim or the abuser. It's sad just how difficult it is to understand such a simple concept. | /r/MensRights | 04/02/13 10:53 PM |
| 4 | Never told anyone this, need to get it off my chest.Just ignore, brother. Judging from their post history, they're probably high as all fuck right now anyway. | /r/MensRights | 28/12/12 05:42 PM |
| 5 | German feminist(Alice Schwarzer) article in favor of Male Genital Mutilation(google translate)Has anyone on this subreddit ever argued in favor of FGM? We don't resist the laws protecting women from genital mutilation. We push to make them sane by addressing the rest of humankind as well. | /r/MensRights | 21/12/12 08:13 PM |
| 7 | Feminist logic in regards to MRA'sThat's exactly the point of this picture, though. Being for men doesn't make one against women, in the same way that you can save whales without killing pandas. Men's Rights isn't about bringing women down. It's about ending the illusion that women are second-class citizens who need to be treated as if they can't do anything for themselves. | /r/MensRights | 01/12/12 02:35 AM |
| 21 | Feminist logic in regards to MRA'sYou could, but you'd be wrong. MRAs are not against women. | /r/MensRights | 01/12/12 12:17 AM |
| 1 | Wife Threatening Action Against me if I get a Vasectomy"I don't know why the baby doesn't look like either of us" Pretty sure if the mother is related to her baby it will look at least partially like her. If OP's wife is a gestational surrogate without his knowledge, their relationship is really weird. :) | /r/MensRights | 21/11/12 11:05 PM |
| 2 | Thank you, MensRights. You've made me a better girlfriend.Slightly off topic, but may I ask why that is? Surely, it doesn't cost you anything to (for example) smile at a stranger. I'm not saying you're a bad person, of course. It's just that recently, there was an awesome discussion here about people automatically assuming that a man they've never met is a rapist or a molester. That kind of assumption is very hurtful to men. That got me thinking that maybe we should assume the best about others, even if it's a disappointment when they aren't great. Do … | /r/MensRights | 21/11/12 06:28 PM |
| 4 | Here's a twist for you...lesbian couple, one is an asshole who lies to put an RO on the other (me)That is literally what the upvote arrow is for. :P | /r/MensRights | 03/11/12 08:32 AM |
| 1 | Male sexual liberation.You're totally right. This is why oral sex isn't enjoyable in the slightest. It's entirely impossible to have offspring with oral stimulation, which is why it brings no pleasure whatsoever to either party. Oh, and masturbation? You might as well be grinding your crotch with sandpaper. Total waste of sperm that could have given you a child if it were only implanted in a uterus. | /r/MensRights | 31/10/12 08:16 PM |
| 1 | Male sexual liberation.You're right. I didn't even notice. | /r/MensRights | 30/10/12 01:26 PM |
| 4 | Male sexual liberation.What you quoted was the urge to procreate. Recreational sex has little, if anything to do with that biological imperative. You're confusing the biological need to have offspring with sex for pleasure. | /r/MensRights | 29/10/12 08:03 PM |
| 16 | Male sexual liberation.men will never just say no Men have, men do and men will. It's up to you to choose which parts of life are important to you. Others have different values than you. | /r/MensRights | 29/10/12 03:42 PM |
| 3 | Update in "Man Asks do I know you" case*sigh* No, I'm not. I'm well aware of the law seeing as I've studied it. I was clearing up your use of the word "accidental" for those who haven't, because its legal definition is a tad different from the common use. | /r/MensRights | 26/10/12 05:05 PM |
| 6 | Update in "Man Asks do I know you" caseThis is the general idea, but that's not always the case. Even if you accidentally run someone over, it's still a crime, just of a lesser degree because you're not actually a threat to society. What this guy did, on the other hand, was basic human interaction and people need to get over it. Also, your comment made me feel uncomfortable and I'm going to report you for third degree assault. | /r/MensRights | 26/10/12 04:25 PM |
| 1 | This $0.77 on the dollar thing set me off todaySorry, I should have been more clear about that. You should have the right to refuse business to people. You do have that right. And let me be clear to say that I'm not trying to tell you what to do or that you're wrong. It's just that if you make it a blanket rule, you're going to exclude people who have done nothing wrong. The idea of ethics was that people should be judged by their actions and not skin color or country of birth. And especially not by the actions of other people. Other service… | /r/MensRights | 20/10/12 07:31 PM |
| 1 | This $0.77 on the dollar thing set me off todayI believe you entirely. I'm sure you have good reasons and it's beneficial to your company. I agree that you have that right. It just seems unethical, you know? | /r/MensRights | 19/10/12 11:18 PM |
| 1 | This $0.77 on the dollar thing set me off todayHave you considered blocking annoying people instead of blocking Brazilians? I can't see how blocking (or better, suspending) a number of accounts would impose a significantly larger load on your servers than IP-blocking Brazil. It's clearly your right to do that, but you can't argue that you're discriminating based on a stereotype you hold, which isn't true for all Brazilians. | /r/MensRights | 19/10/12 10:30 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter