TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

youknowthebenadryl Archive

View 5 posts and 214 comments by youknowthebenadryl on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Sex without informed consent. If the gender is being lied about the consent is not informed. Do you?
/r/MensRights26/07/26 03:58 PM
1

I gave up trying to reason with them
/r/MensRights23/09/24 08:34 PM
3

But women can step away from parental responsibility, men cannot
/r/MensRights21/09/24 08:30 AM
3

He’s talking about parental responsibility not sex
/r/MensRights20/09/24 09:51 AM
2

That’s literally a whole different topic
/r/MensRights20/09/24 01:41 AM
7

I think 2 things need to happen. Thing 1: men are given the right to walk away from parenthood. A legal agreement where both the mother and father agree to never reveal the father’s identity to the child. No child support but also zero involvement in the child’s life. Thing 2: mandatory paternity tests administered before child support can be received. If a woman wants the father of the child to pay for the child then the “father” has to be 100% known to be the biological father. No man should h…
/r/MensRights23/08/24 09:38 AM
8

This isn’t me arguing with you btw just a great example of misandry/androcide
/r/MensRights19/08/24 02:46 PM
9

Google Joanne Dennehy
/r/MensRights19/08/24 02:44 PM
1

I don’t think intervening should be looked down on, I do think if you have children it changes the whole game though. Being a father is as much about making smart decisions for your family as it is about being stoic and upstanding. It’s tough.
/r/MensRights14/12/23 10:18 PM
1

Physical harm is not the only risk. Your idea of a swift debilitating attack leaves you open to indictment yourself. This conundrum is not so black and white
/r/MensRights14/12/23 09:57 PM
3

Theoretically I agree but I’d advise the same thing for women as men, ring the police and keep yourself and as many others safe as possible without endangering yourself
/r/MensRights13/12/23 09:23 PM
2

You don’t unless you witness a crime in which you identify the criminal and report them to the police.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 09:22 PM
4

Agree wholeheartedly
/r/MensRights13/12/23 08:19 PM
4

In which case I apologise I misunderstood the point made
/r/MensRights13/12/23 07:43 PM
2

“Protect young” yes but they don’t protect all of the herd. At least engage your brain before thinking. Children of course should be protected at ALL costs
/r/MensRights13/12/23 07:42 PM
7

Said with the bravery of a thousand keyboard warriors🫡
/r/MensRights13/12/23 07:39 PM
1

I’m not too fussed about women in this instance this for me is about expectations of men
/r/MensRights13/12/23 07:20 PM
1

We’re all surrounded by criminals
/r/MensRights13/12/23 07:18 PM
1

In that case you should start wearing your underwear outside your trousers and put a cape on. If you believe inaction is an action you should be tackling every criminal you come across
/r/MensRights13/12/23 06:12 PM
2

There’s no right or wrong answers I believe it should be down to individual choice and nobody should be judged either way
/r/MensRights13/12/23 05:58 PM
6

Calling the police is the option I would always choose.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 05:53 PM
3

I agree, but when you have dependents at home, option a over option b for me
/r/MensRights13/12/23 05:53 PM
3

Due to the reaction of a recent case
/r/MensRights13/12/23 05:52 PM
3

Knives are prevalent in the uk however and also a deadly weapon and easily concealable
/r/MensRights13/12/23 05:52 PM
2

And I don’t want anyone to die playing hero
/r/MensRights13/12/23 05:50 PM
3

Again, how does that make them responsible for the criminals actions?
/r/MensRights13/12/23 05:50 PM
3

Simply due to the reaction of a recent case
/r/MensRights13/12/23 05:49 PM
6

Self defence is legally flawed at least in the UK as it’s a perception of “reasonable force”
/r/MensRights13/12/23 05:46 PM
2

How are you to be certain an assailant is not in possession of a weapon? Thats the main crux of this. Any physical intervention is a risk to your own safety and risk that your family will suffer from the consequences of your actions.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 03:50 PM
5

I wasn’t aware that trains have fire extinguishers available for use to be fair. However this then presents the risk of you facing arrest yourself.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 03:49 PM
2

Again, putting yourself in danger being the key element. How do you know how much danger you are in?
/r/MensRights13/12/23 03:42 PM
7

I completely understand where you are coming from. However, do you think the risk of physical harm to oneself is also to be considered?
/r/MensRights13/12/23 03:42 PM
1

I’m intrigued as to how an innocent victim of circumstance is in anyway to blame for the actions of a criminal?
/r/MensRights13/12/23 03:41 PM
4

No, the witness testified in court and aided with the conviction. However socially the witness(a man with his 11 year old child) has been criticised for not physically intervening. Which I think is baffling.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 03:40 PM
4

I hope that you never get hurt/killed playing the hero. Power to you.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 03:39 PM
6

The without being harmed yourself is the key part there, completely agree
/r/MensRights13/12/23 03:38 PM
4

“The right thing” is a grey area. You step in end up dead, you have kids at home now without one of their parents. Is it still the right thing to do?
/r/MensRights13/12/23 01:08 PM
4

And say the intended victim got away and your wife/daughter ended up being killed. How do you reconcile with that fact? Not meaning to sound in anyway patronising. I just always encourage my loved ones to keep themselves safe and let the police, fire brigade etc do what they do.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 01:07 PM
10

I should’ve made it clearer, granted. I mean physically intervening. The difficulty I have with the multitude of factors is how do you know whether someone is armed or not?
/r/MensRights13/12/23 11:54 AM
34

I agree, I think the reasonable course of action is to inform the people whose responsibility it is to protect them and keep the level of victims to a minimum
/r/MensRights13/12/23 11:53 AM
2

That’s good for you, but not what I was asking
/r/MensRights13/12/23 11:52 AM
0

I agree but not due to the reasoning.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 11:30 AM
3

Not by the logic of the first response. You go in there and get chopped up too. But at least you tried.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 11:29 AM
10

I don’t mean stepping in by calling the police, that is a given. I mean physically attempting to stop the assailant. I agree however that is not how society is viewed and we all are aware of that.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 11:10 AM
14

I hear you, but devils advocate, the man saves the woman but in the process gets killed. The man has 2 kids at home, does the woman he saved then step in and provide for his kids?
/r/MensRights13/12/23 11:08 AM
1

Bro, I started off with it’s what I think but I’m open to hearing other points of view. You’ve just spent 3 days of your life arguing against me and then claim to be in the same boat as me. Mothers and fathers are equally important, they just have different roles. Easy to be taken advantage of? Because I have a sense of duty as a partner and a dad? Who’s gonna take advantage of me when I see the world in black and white terms? What a waste of 3 days for us both🥱
/r/MensRights27/11/23 05:52 AM
1

You’ve answered none of mine. I feel sorry for your Mrs, she with a softie who’d put himself before her.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 07:51 PM
1

Your logic is simply flawed.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 05:49 PM
1

It genuinely is.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 04:56 PM
1

And you are a liberal authoritarian
/r/MensRights26/11/23 04:55 PM
1

I didn’t attend college but my IQ is higher than 93% of the populations👍
/r/MensRights26/11/23 04:42 PM
1

I was speaking as you. I’m the one that judges people based on their gender. I’m as opposite to a feminist as you can come. But your position is I’m like a feminist, despite thinking the exact opposite to them. It’s mental gymnastics Olympic level
/r/MensRights26/11/23 04:41 PM
1

Oh god, arguing from authority now, that really is a feminist’s forte. I have a major in women’s studies so I’m right…🤣🤣🤣🤣
/r/MensRights26/11/23 04:39 PM
1

You’d judge people accordingly to their genders rather than treating them equally, you must be a feminist. That is your position?😂😂😂
/r/MensRights26/11/23 04:38 PM
1

I’m not frustrated at all, I’m mocking you, ironically using the exact same quote I use to mock feminists. This isn’t going well for you my friend.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 04:33 PM
1

I think you’re as important but in the instance we’re discussing I would expect you to allow your partner and children to go to safety. If you wouldn’t yes I am judging you as a man and a father. And it’s not a good judgement of you my friend. I’m giving the exact opposite of feminist view points as I don’t believe that men and women are equal and have roles. Yet I’m the feminist who can’t critically think?😂 okay😂
/r/MensRights26/11/23 04:32 PM
1

Waaaahh your point doesn’t suit my agenda so I’m going to disregard it waaahhh
/r/MensRights26/11/23 04:29 PM
1

And it’s the biggest lack of accountability as a father I’ve ever heard. Your kids will have no sense of nobility or chivalry growing up and that’s just sad man.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 04:26 PM
1

So those hostages don’t count because they don’t suit your argument😂😂😂 and I argue like a feminist?😂😂😂
/r/MensRights26/11/23 04:20 PM
1

That’s how😂😂
/r/MensRights26/11/23 04:19 PM
1

Do you think in a hostage situation you are as important as a mother?
/r/MensRights26/11/23 04:15 PM
1

Have a look into who the main escapees of concentration camps were during the holocaust. Get back to me on that.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 04:15 PM
1

It’s funny because you’re arguing based on your perception of your self importance, which is how a feminist argues. I was just curious to your opinion.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 04:12 PM
1

Okay. Depends what you mean by “sacrifice”, countries always have an elite team who are charged with carrying out the most difficult missions as they are most likely to succeed. In a hostage situation men are more likely to survive than women.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 03:59 PM
1

It’s not a pivot, it’s an additional point. Do you think I’m in the minority with my point of view?
/r/MensRights26/11/23 03:56 PM
1

So by your logic we should send women to the frontline of a war first as that is when the war is at its most violent and as supplies and morale start to dwindle then send the men(physically superior) to finish the job?
/r/MensRights26/11/23 03:54 PM
1

Keeping women POW’s is also about the effect it has on the opposing side of the war, not just about impregnating them.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 03:51 PM
1

You neglect the fact that my position is children depend on mother, and mother and children depend on father. If mother and children depend on father, father in turn cannot depend on mother. Again if you want to argue my point you have to understand it first. You can’t argue that moth and father are both dependent on each other because that makes absolutely zero sense.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 03:40 PM
2

50 fighting age men significant, 50 child bearing women insignificant. Is that genuinely how your mind works?😂😂😂😂
/r/MensRights26/11/23 03:38 PM
1

50 children more a year that can be had. It’s not about army size but about bloodline continuity.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 03:15 PM
1

Children > mother Family > father In terms of dependency this is all that exists. If you want to start arguing different things are more important you could say the children are the least important as the father and mother can always make more of them. That’s how ridiculous your argument is.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 03:14 PM
1

Or someone who has studied and understood history and war.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 03:08 PM
1

Do you have kids?
/r/MensRights26/11/23 03:05 PM
1

Because I don’t agree with you?
/r/MensRights26/11/23 03:04 PM
1

No it doesn’t.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 03:04 PM
1

I didn’t say women can’t protect children, I said they’re not as capable. I’ve stated that the mother has a duty to the children, what do you think that entails?
/r/MensRights26/11/23 03:03 PM
1

Except if you have women held hostage in a theatre of war they are able to be used to further the population of the enemy, not something you want to happen in a battle.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 03:02 PM
1

No. Children > mother.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 02:58 PM
1

That isn’t the situation though. These are hostages. It is not a given that they will all be killed.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 02:57 PM
1

Family > father
/r/MensRights26/11/23 02:55 PM
1

It’s the best interest of the family. The most competent protector protects the family. If they go the responsibility then falls onto the second most competent protect(the mother). So on and so forth.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 02:54 PM
1

No. It is to protect the family. Not just the children.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 02:52 PM
1

My role as protector isn’t solely to the kids, it is to the family. Because the family is dependent on my ability to protect. Why can’t you grasp this.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 02:51 PM
1

But in this situation to protect the family I must let them all safely escape first😂 if you lose a family member to sustain yourself you may as well not be a protector😂
/r/MensRights26/11/23 02:48 PM
1

If you have no role in life you’re an abject failure. If I die I’ve successfully protected the family. If I survive I can continue to protect them. That’s how the role of protector works.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 02:45 PM
1

But if I die and the children and my partner survive I’ve carried out my role successfully 🧠💣💥
/r/MensRights26/11/23 02:43 PM
1

But if we’ve all been taken hostage would me ensuring the families safety not fulfilling the role of protector?😂😂😂
/r/MensRights26/11/23 02:42 PM
1

That’s applicable in my situation, I’m not every father figure on the planet, however it applies to many. And it’s not just about provision but also protection. I’m more capable at defending the family than my partner. These aren’t tropes just objective facts.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 02:39 PM
1

Because of the levels of dependency required to be responsible for that role. A woman can not be depended on to protect and provide for a whole family, a man can. It’s not a hard concept.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 02:38 PM
1

Women’s duty is to the children because the children can solely depend on the woman. Men’s duty is to the family because the family can solely depend on the man. It isn’t a hard concept.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 02:37 PM
1

This is painful. That isn’t in regard to who should be caregiver and who should be part of the work force. Completely different points.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 02:34 PM
1

But that argument is a different argument to the one you’re attempting to make. That point is in reference to a time of crisis not in reference to who should be a caregiver and who should be part of the labour force. You can’t take two separate points and merge them together.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 02:34 PM
1

I argued that a mothers duty is to the children and a fathers duty is to the family. I didn’t argue how that manifests itself in traditional vs modern society, I just argued that it was the case due to thousands of years of that being the case. If you genuinely think differently that is fine but at least understand my argument before trying to pick holes in it.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 02:32 PM
1

What do you mean “news flash”😂😂😂 I made the point that women are now providers and that it has had sub optimal results on family life😂😂😂 incredible
/r/MensRights26/11/23 02:28 PM
1

I implied that men have always been the providers because they have, I have no opinion on how it “ought” to be. So yes you are wrong.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 02:24 PM
1

I never stipulated that women should be stay at home wives. That’s an assumption you made. I stated that women entering the workforce has made it so that men and women both have to work because one wage isn’t sustainable. Rightly or wrongly it was the case that women were not part of the workforce and men were not stay at home parents. However having both(mothers and fathers) in the workforce is detrimental to the rearing of children.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 02:22 PM
1

Sanitary methods of waste removal have benefitted the human race. Has women becoming providers benefitted the human race in any way? Strained relationships between parents and children. Wages driven down as households now rely on 2 relatively smaller wages instead of 1 reasonable wage. Standard of food preparation and consumption dropping year on year. You can’t argue against millenniums of evolution because it hurts your feelings.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 02:02 PM
1

Only thing my partner wasn’t when I met her-a virgin. Every other box ticked. It wasn’t like she was a 304 though, and I’m not perfect myself so can’t expect her to be.
/r/MensRights25/11/23 01:20 PM
1

I mean if you read the original comment you replied to, I did state I’m open to other points of view but this is personally what I think. Like I think we do agree, I just gave my personal stance but also left it fairly open ended imo. Yeah I was researching the British empire the other day, mainly because I’m a firm believer that for all the bad it did, it had a net positive impact on the world. And I came across the fact that first wave feminism first appeared around 30-40 years into Queen Vict…
/r/MensRights23/11/23 04:09 PM
1

In essence though, for me it is in a vacuum. I’m in a relationship where I am respected fully and allowed to be a man. I make the household decisions. I provide. I’ve not been in a situation where I need to protect but if I had to I am more than willing. In return, I only do optionally do housework and cooking, I am never nagged. I come home to quiet, there is no arguing in the house. Maybe the issue isn’t that men should strive for equality but they should have standards like mine and not allow…
/r/MensRights23/11/23 03:06 PM
0

I do think that it’s probable that my attitude is a rare one but I am surrounded by good women which is rare. Don’t get me wrong the way women act in society sickens me and I am fully behind men’s rights issues. But on a personal level the women in my life are absolutely top tier.
/r/MensRights23/11/23 06:24 AM
0

That’s how it has been for thousands of years.
/r/MensRights23/11/23 06:22 AM
1

What age are your children?
/r/MensRights23/11/23 06:21 AM
0

Nope it’s because she cannot provide for them the same way that I can. If anything were to happen to me there will always be another provider somewhere in the world. If anything happens to her there will never be another mother for my children.
/r/MensRights22/11/23 11:24 PM
-2

Her duty is to the kids, my duty is to the whole family. That’s just how it is.
/r/MensRights22/11/23 11:23 PM
-2

Taking my point out of context there aren’t you. I said treating men like women in the context of not holding them accountable. What we should be doing is treating women more like men. However in terms of crisis such as war and disaster men are far more expendable. That is an unfortunate reality of life. If you want to sit and cry about it then you do that, nothing to stop you and nothing wrong with that. But if we are to make progress towards true gender equality we need to understand our roles…
/r/MensRights22/11/23 08:26 PM
0

I literally and copy and pasted it. No implying a father should take his role seriously. Treating men like women and not holding them accountable won’t solve anything. Men specifically because my partner is able to defend herself against women and children, such is biology.
/r/MensRights22/11/23 08:05 PM
-2

In times of turmoil I literally only care about the wellbeing of my nearest and dearest. I don’t care what the family next to me are going through. White knight fantasy? Bro that’s literally my family you’re talking about. In the nicest way possible with my absolute best intentions, I would murder any man on the planet to ensure my family’s safety. As much as I want to advance men’s rights, not one of you on this sub or anywhere else on the planet would be put over my family if left up to me. Th…
/r/MensRights22/11/23 06:57 PM
-27

As I stated elsewhere in the thread, I believe a mothers duty is to the children whereas a fathers duty is to the whole family. I’m open to other points of view but personally I think that’s the way it should be when children are involved.
/r/MensRights22/11/23 12:12 PM
0

Her primary duty is to my children. If she put me first before my children she would not be in a relationship with me nor would she have children with me. She has not made me accept any delusions, I am a father and my duty is to the whole family, she is a mother and her duty is to the children.
/r/MensRights22/11/23 11:20 AM
0

I understand the point, however as a father I would advocate for my partner and children to be freed before I am at the risk of any one of them being left behind. In times of turmoil I literally only care about the wellbeing of my nearest and dearest. I don’t care what the family next to me are going through.
/r/MensRights22/11/23 11:10 AM
-1

That’s fine, but my kids are 100% safe with my partner which is their mother so I’d happily let them go free. You missed my point entirely.
/r/MensRights22/11/23 11:04 AM
13

To be absolutely 100% clear, I do agree it’s discriminatory, however as a father I would always sacrifice my freedom for the sake of my children being at home, safe and comfortable with their mother.
/r/MensRights22/11/23 09:56 AM
4

How about the existence of queens and female emperors/pharaohs etc? It was never about gender but power, wealth, birthright and bloodline.
/r/MensRights16/11/23 06:48 AM
1

No bother🫡 I completely understand
/r/MensRights11/11/23 08:33 PM
1

The rules of social interaction these days disgust me
/r/MensRights11/11/23 08:09 PM
2

No worries brother. My old swimming coach (Callum Lawson) was disabled but was a brilliant swimmer and got bronze IIRC in breast stroke at the Paralympics for GB. Proper inspiring bloke and especially I was kind of young at the time gave me an insight on how being disabled is of course limiting but in no ways makes a person limited. It sickens me that people are called incels when the origin of that phrase is involuntarily celibate, which as you know yourself, being disabled heavily affects your…
/r/MensRights11/11/23 08:05 PM
1

On account of a lot of the involuntarily celibate being because they are disabled.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 07:59 PM
2

I imagine it is extremely hard being in a wheelchair, however big up to you for being strong enough to talk about it! If you do any sports or anything and need a specialist chair drop me a message. My godfather manages a business that manufactures wheelchairs and some are used in the Paralympics. I’ll see if I can get any discount as a friend of the family💪
/r/MensRights11/11/23 07:15 PM
3

I wasn’t seeking it, I just came across it
/r/MensRights11/11/23 06:17 PM
7

Oh no I would never let on I was offended personally in any debate. Also I’m not personally offended as I’m in a committed relationship with an active sex life, I just have autistic friends and conventionally unattractive friends who I know do not have great self confidence. This forum I can be openly honest with fellow men and know that judgement will not be passed too harshly. I appreciate the advice though.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 04:19 PM
15

I think the term incel is extremely offensive. Being called involuntarily celibate is sex shaming and quite often body shaming. It just reinforces the message that calling women fat 304’s should not be frowned upon.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 04:03 PM
6

Circumcision as a medical procedure to treat a medical issue is fine. Circumcision enforced on a young child is genital mutilation. Remember that we have evolved as a species and each body part we have evolved with has evolved with us to serve a purpose.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 02:14 PM
2

She’s pretty consistent, she’s an excellent mother and she works hard on herself, on the relationship and at work. Can’t really complain about her. I make sure every weekend I take the kids down before she’s awake to give her a lie in because honestly I understand how lucky I am to have a partner like that. And also I hate staying in bed late myself😂
/r/MensRights09/11/23 09:09 AM
5

I’m well aware of the limitations of women. They are easily led by propaganda and fancy slogans. To be happy as a man you need to find a woman who is happy to surrender to being led by you. After a lot of deep conversations throughout our relationship her views have come to align with mine and she has started to view the world through my eyes. It isn’t manipulation, it’s just giving her a different perspective which she happens to agree with more than the tripe spewed by the media.
/r/MensRights09/11/23 08:55 AM
1

I’m only talking solely on the law of averages. Men generally do longer hours, have less time off and are available to do overtime. Nothing to do with man can do this woman can’t do that blah blah blah. Just talking about the reality of work life.
/r/MensRights08/11/23 06:07 PM
1

The statistics are very clear. On average men work longer hours. Do more overtime. Have less time off. Work output is a completely different argument. In terms of work however this should be what defines work. Domestic labour is undoubtedly challenging, but should not be considered as work. If you don’t work you are unemployed however if you don’t look after your house and family you are a tramp. There is a distinction imo. For me, being a woman does not lessen or validate your opinion at all. Y…
/r/MensRights08/11/23 03:33 PM
5

My assumption is that DIY yes would be classed as housework but driving definitely isn’t. I’ve never seen that covered in any study.
/r/MensRights08/11/23 03:23 PM
3

The post I found myself debating against others in did not cite the sources they used, they just claimed women undertake 66% of work. I’m sorry to hear that you’ve experienced that bad luck in your life and wish you all the best in staying safe and healthy. People who are self employed don’t have a supervisor and they still work, I’m confused by this last comment.
/r/MensRights08/11/23 02:44 PM
1

I’d say male teenagers aren’t kept as teenagers at all, they’re encouraged to be women. Emotional, irrational and illogical.
/r/MensRights08/11/23 02:27 PM
5

If I had enough money, I would do a teaching degree and home school my children in alignment with the curriculum but without the gender biases. I do as much to help my partner as possible and I pay all of the bills. I’m lucky however, she will do anything for me at the drop of a hat. The money she earns from work is our groceries and fun money. We save up for big things like cars and holidays together. It works well
/r/MensRights08/11/23 02:21 PM
12

It goes deeper than that. They think that a man working more hours should do 50% of the housework. They also think that if a man covers every single bill in the household, the man should still also do 50% of the housework. I understand that having children will complicate the statistics so single men who do all of those things for themselves will in their eyes mean they clearly don’t work as hard as parents. But to me having time with your children shouldn’t be seen as a chore at all. I love my …
/r/MensRights08/11/23 02:07 PM
25

The example I used was driving, on average men drive much more frequently and much longer distances. Unless paid for travel (which only a small section of the work force are) why is that then not considered to be work? Apparently that example doesn’t count
/r/MensRights08/11/23 01:53 PM
50

Had this conversation with my partner the other day, she was horrified that I said I wouldn’t defend a woman from an attacker if I was on my own. Until I reminded her that my involvement could lead to a world of possibilities where I could end up imprisoned, disabled or dead and our 2 kids would grow up without the best version of me available. When logic was applied she all of a sudden understood my position and did a complete 180° to agree with me. Why do women who mean nothing to us assume ou…
/r/MensRights08/11/23 01:36 PM
7

There’s a reason for this, deaths caused by alcoholism, accidental drug overdoses or succumbing to living conditions from homelessness are referred to as “deaths of despair”. I can’t remember the exact numbers but these deaths are dominated by men too.
/r/MensRights21/10/23 07:24 AM
0

As a father I’m more than okay with my kids staying safe and at home with my partner. If a woman does not have a child it should be a mandatory requirement for them to be conscripted too.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 01:18 PM
0

It says exactly that
/r/MensRights12/10/23 04:23 PM
1

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/articles/abuseduringchildhood/findingsfromtheyearendingmarch2016crimesurveyforenglandandwales#things-you-need-to-know Here is the full report.
/r/MensRights12/10/23 08:36 AM
1

In the UK the ONS openly have data on all forms of child abuse. The one to pay particular notice to is abuse in children from single parent families. The data indicates children in a single parent household are more likely to suffer from abuse. In the UK around 90%* of single parent families are mother and children. It’s all there but doesn’t explicitly make the link. I can message you with an image of the table that the ONS provides if it satisfies your search for knowledge on the matter. *edit…
/r/MensRights12/10/23 07:27 AM
1

I literally gave you the opportunity to leave it and you insisted on continuing. And you call me a troll. Weird.
/r/MensRights11/10/23 05:39 PM
1

But your comment is irrelevant. Unless you think that being a stay at home parent should be monetised? That’s where I’m losing you. It’s not rubbish at all, being at work does not hinder your ability to be a good parent. Staying at home with children does hinder your ability to progress in your career. Equating the two is undoubtedly rubbish.
/r/MensRights11/10/23 02:29 PM
1

So your whole argument isn’t actually relevant to the point I was trying to make then. I argued that equating skills which can be monetised vs parenting skills is a poor stance. I don’t quite know what you’re arguing but I’ve followed you down a path to a point where you’re essentially claiming that practice improves an end result. Like what are you arguing? Should stay at home parents be subsidised work? Is that your argument?
/r/MensRights11/10/23 06:06 AM
5

Noones scoffing at the research, we’re all scoffing at the conclusion.
/r/MensRights11/10/23 05:53 AM
12

If as a result of this research men get more time at home with their children I see it having a net positive impact on society. I’m not against it.
/r/MensRights10/10/23 10:10 PM
1

Not what I said. But if you want to take this as a victory to please your ego please feel free to do so.
/r/MensRights10/10/23 10:09 PM
4

Honestly I’m bored of you chatting absolute waffle. The point I originally made was you can’t equate parenting skills to occupational skills. Nothing you say in response to that will convince me otherwise. Don’t waste your time.
/r/MensRights10/10/23 10:02 PM
7

You are ridiculous. The “natural” parent being considered the mother is misandry. Single parent households with fathers are statistically better off than with single parent mothers. But sure you can buy into that if you want and then claim you support men getting shared custody.
/r/MensRights10/10/23 09:53 PM
7

What are you talking about?🤣 doing the job of the doctors and midwives is not part of parenthood. The point I was making was regarding the courts assuming the caregiver would be better because they spend more time at home with a child. There is absolutely nothing to support that. What a ridiculous argument you’ve just tried to make🤣
/r/MensRights10/10/23 09:42 PM
3

I’m aware of how lucky I am, my partner is an absolute diamond. Can’t speak highly enough of her. I wish every man the best of luck in finding a partner like mine.
/r/MensRights10/10/23 09:20 PM
5

The minute I became a dad I just knew what to do, i personally found it very easy to figure out what my kids needed and when even as newborns. I know it doesn’t come naturally to everyone, like I get it, but the idea you can compare parenting which has been done since the dawn of humanity to applied skill to produce something in a work environment is an absolute joke.
/r/MensRights10/10/23 09:18 PM
16

Genuinely I’ve been very lucky to be blessed with my partner, she found a job which hours work around my hours giving me the chance to spend good quality time with my kids and giving her the chance to succeed in what she wants to do. She’s just had a promotion and we’ve both never been happier. It’s amazing how compromising and working together rather than competing makes life 100% better isn’t it
/r/MensRights10/10/23 06:10 PM
82

If you read the article she blames “greedy jobs” for not paying women the same despite less time served in jobs due to childcare. I assume the stance will remain a woman shouldn’t be punished for having children. So instead of men who have devoted their time away from the home to an employer earning the most, both should be paid the same. Ridiculous stance but feminism isn’t a stranger to a lack of common sense.
/r/MensRights10/10/23 05:52 PM
30

Poor equivalent. At work you require knowledge and skill to complete your job. To be a parent no training can be given, it comes instinctively and from taking the time to understand your child. No matter how much someone works they can still be a good parent.
/r/MensRights10/10/23 04:42 PM
1

The point I made wasn’t about women not being wary of men. The point I’m making is that if we’re going to use numbers alone to justify persecution then we have a lot of things to consider. The higher rates of child abuse in single parent families, infanticide, differences in crimes committed by different races etc etc. it’s lazy to say men are more aggressive therefore men are violent/rapists/murderers because that’s simply not true.
/r/MensRights02/10/23 05:55 AM
1

As far as I’m aware in terms of violent crime between men on men and women on women and then reciprocal violence the numbers are fairly similar as a percentage. The male on women crime which is skewed by random attacks which are imo because men don’t fear women due to biological differences. But that’s why I highlight criminals not men. Crimes by chance are far less common than crimes between individuals who know each other but still highlight physical differences and probably attitude differenc…
/r/MensRights01/10/23 06:22 PM
2

The point being using a small percentage as a general measure is a ridiculous amount. *a ridiculous gauge, beers have been flowing today my mistake. More criminal means as a representation of criminal convictions vs the population of that demographic. I’m a staunch believer that the high levels of criminality and recidivism within the black community has very little to do with behaviour and so much more to do with 1. Reputation. 2. Discrimination and 3. Cultural differences.
/r/MensRights01/10/23 06:01 PM
1

A list of things to avoid doing according to women👍
/r/MensRights01/10/23 05:57 PM
2

I picked one case to make a point, Beverly allit is another known example from the uk and there are hundreds of other infant murderers. It’s not an isolated case. out of curiosity if we’re going from solely statistics, do you think black people are more criminal than white people?
/r/MensRights01/10/23 04:28 PM
1

So do we not trust neonatal nurses anymore because of the actions of Lucy Letby?
/r/MensRights01/10/23 06:05 AM
3

There’s no way to sugar coat it, men do commit more crime, that’s a fact. But whenever I see “men are the problem” that is what infuriates me. Criminals are the problem, not men.
/r/MensRights01/10/23 06:02 AM
-2

“The guy with the list” on tiktok
/r/MensRights01/10/23 05:44 AM
2

All politicians want men to be down trodden, we are after all the soldier class. They need to know we’re under the boot so when they need us as canon fodder, we are cannon fodder and when times are peaceful we aren’t uprising.
/r/MensRights28/09/23 07:48 PM
3

Genuinely, this space is for anyone who wants to listen when men speak. Yes it’s a lot of complaining and ranting by anonymous users, but you sure as hell won’t ever hear us moan in our actual lives. We know better than to do that. And as for being a “feminist lesbian” we can all get behind that as long as the feminism is traditional feminism, not the intersectional bs that is peddled by the professional victims of today.
/r/MensRights28/09/23 07:46 PM
3

I’ve come off most social media for this reason. Hugely in favour of keeping life for yourself as private as possible.
/r/MensRights22/09/23 01:14 PM
2

The wild thing is though all of these things are happening while a right wing party sit in government. This isn’t a left vs right issue this is a control issue. Both major parties in the UK and the US are abhorrent.
/r/MensRights22/09/23 01:07 PM
13

He literally just said he’s being labelled an incel. Being shamed for a conscious choice is essential coercion. *essentially coercion.
/r/MensRights22/09/23 01:02 PM
2

Not only is it hate speech but it’s also “sex shaming” which feminists screech about constantly. Can’t call a girl frigid or on the other end of the spectrum you can’t call a girl a 304 but calling a man an incel is fine apparently. The mental gymnastics some go through to arrive at their view of how society should operate is almost impressive.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 09:05 AM
5

So the west then😂😂😂 Eastern European is still western civilisation
/r/MensRights31/08/23 10:01 AM
4

Culture wars are now the way governments win elections. If a government can pick a battle that isn’t really a battle but people will get behind because it’s popular on social media, their policies won’t matter. Whilst incompetent, politicians aren’t dumb. You’re probably right about the government causing issues to keep the conversations relevant.
/r/MensRights31/08/23 09:59 AM
9

What a way to show the world that the court was wrong and you deserve custody😒 awful human
/r/MensRights29/08/23 05:28 PM
1

You’ve taken it completely out of context, the following sentences are “he’ll have sex with you, but he’ll never leave his wife. Then it occurs to you… why should all those other women be so happy with their newborn babies…?” It literally implies that the rejection felt from the high value man not leaving his wife is a direct correlation to some sick warped jealous thoughts towards other women because they have had babies. The second paragraph is just meaningless waffle.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 07:14 AM
3

Not convinced she did it? Not only is there a whistle blower on the fact that people higher up than her were working to cover up the fact it was happening but also the staff on the ward every time a baby collapsed allegedly would ask “is Lucy on shift?”… they all knew, it’s sickening nothing was done sooner and personally for me I think she’d look wonderful stood next to Wayne cousens and any other person who uses their position of trust to kill on the gallows.
/r/MensRights23/08/23 08:55 PM
1

So it’s the male doctors fault she snaps? Maybe women need to not get involved with married men? Just a thought.
/r/MensRights23/08/23 08:52 PM
14

To be fair, the police did a very good job of collecting a good amount of evidence to ensure a conviction
/r/MensRights18/08/23 04:40 PM
4

The issue here isn’t whether she would have or not have reported it. The issue is arresting someone solely on the word on another is a very dangerous precedent. None of us know what occurred, however, is it possible that she thought she saw something that she didn’t? Yes. Is it possible that she saw what she said she saw? Yes. Is it possible she is lying? Yes. Should any of these 3 scenarios cause the man to be arrested? Absolutely 110% no.
/r/MensRights13/08/23 07:39 PM
0

Dense cunt? Bro why are you so triggered over a strangers opinion on the internet😂😂😂 go outside and touch some grass
/r/MensRights15/07/23 06:13 AM
2

💯
/r/MensRights14/07/23 09:21 PM
9

I think a distinction between found not guilty and proven to be innocent has to be made here. If someone is murdered and no one is ever convicted the murder still happened.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 07:50 PM
2

Imagine if this reaction was the baseline for all professions. Barmaids being bought drinks by patrons must mean they’re all sluts and gagging for the attention🤣🤣🤣 such an immature and disgusting reaction to you being open about your profession and the challenges you face.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 01:35 PM
3

Baldness!!! 💯 I’ve been called a bald expletive of your choice more than my name since I’ve shaved my head due to the receding hairline. Luckily for me it’s not something that massively affects me, however the moment I joke about anyone else’s appearance all of a sudden I’m a bad person and have no right to make them sorts of comments.
/r/MensRights09/07/23 03:30 PM
4

Being gay doesn’t make a man any less of a man, you’re among friends here
/r/MensRights05/07/23 08:10 PM
2

Voting the right way and being likeable are two very different things😂
/r/MensRights29/06/23 06:01 AM
3

Not so much that it was all female, more that the females weren’t experienced enough or likeable enough imo🤷‍♂️ I’m a big fan of some of the ladies in the Labour Party and others not at all
/r/MensRights28/06/23 07:46 PM
7

Let me just make sure I’m getting this correct…when girls at school are told that their skirts are inappropriately short or tight and they don’t match the uniform standard it’s misogyny and the boys and male teachers obviously need to learn to control themselves. But when a group of boys where shorts they are forced into isolation/suspended?
/r/MensRights28/06/23 06:00 AM
2

So it’s little self awareness, you’re literally arguing right now🤣
/r/MensRights26/06/23 02:19 PM
1

Do you know what helps when learning? Absorbing information rather than arguing it away. This sub for the most part is a very good place for men to anecdotally tell their stories the same way that women do all the time. The reason men do it here is so they don’t get shouted down and told they don’t matter which is exactly what you are doing. Either you have very little self awareness or you’re untrue about your motives.
/r/MensRights26/06/23 01:11 PM
1

In the same way that the previous comment said that Andrew tate admitted to his crimes and is now recanting. My point being, it doesn’t matter what people claim, facts are what need establishing
/r/MensRights21/06/23 05:28 AM
-3

If you have Reddit you have google my friend
/r/MensRights20/06/23 08:50 PM
9

She’s currently on trial for murdering 7 infants and attempting to murder 10 more, and this dumb motherfucker kept patient notes of her victims, obsessively searched for the parents of the victims on Facebook and wrote on post it notes left around her apartment saying things like “I did it” / “I’m guilty” / “I’m evil” etc.
/r/MensRights20/06/23 07:48 PM
9

1 or 2 allegations it could be accidental, lack of capability or a coincidence, 7 murder charges and 10 more attempted murder charges, I’d be highly surprised if she ran the board.
/r/MensRights20/06/23 07:47 PM
44

Not a fan of the man, however it’s an interesting situation where the feminists are shouting from the rooftops about how guilty he is yet in the same breath are defending Lucy Letby and claiming she’s innocent until “proven” guilty. Do they not see the double standards?
/r/MensRights20/06/23 04:51 PM
3

I’m done with arguing with you, I’m bored
/r/MensRights19/06/23 10:40 PM
3

Not right at all, you just can’t argue in good faith and that’s infuriating. Bathrooms are certainly different to gyms and bars, are you okay?🤣 also there used to be men only bars and guess what women did…insisted they should be allowed in them. Men want to be separate at work and I don’t see a problem with that. Works more important than free time so I’d say actually men have more of a stake to want that than women wanting it doing their hobbies.
/r/MensRights19/06/23 10:27 PM
3

“Gyms, transport and bars” I never said bathrooms. Lying isn’t a good luck. Like I said, you’re boring.
/r/MensRights19/06/23 10:21 PM
3

Men commit more crime on men, nobody is claiming men feel uncomfortable around other men, men can fight each other. It’s insane that you’re taking an argument to an extreme to try and prove a point that we’ve taken to a logical conclusion twice already, disingenuous, argumentative and just plain boring.
/r/MensRights19/06/23 10:16 PM
3

And again you’re back to the position that men are inherently the problem. I’m saying don’t gatekeep what men should want when women make just as ridiculous demands.
/r/MensRights19/06/23 10:08 PM
3

Women are saying they should have segregated gyms, public transport, bars etc etc and no one bats an eye. I want people to be safe, I have no ulterior motive.
/r/MensRights19/06/23 10:02 PM
3

It’s widely accepted women are uncomfortable around men, I don’t have an issue with that in the slightest. I’d rather women be cautious and SA and murder numbers drop massively and some egos get hurt than innocent people getting hurt and murdered.
/r/MensRights19/06/23 09:49 PM
3

Can’t you read, I’m saying you should be cautious of your friends. No I didn’t I said nursery nursing which is childcare🤣 That’s fine, but since that’s the case we’ve gone full circle. The original point is men feel uncomfortable with women being in the work place and they have fair reason to. It’s been a long round about way of getting here but I’m glad we’ve made it in the end.
/r/MensRights19/06/23 09:44 PM
3

Because your fear would be rational if you were scared of your friends rather than strangers. Men are almost as likely to end up in a bad spot with a friend or a stranger. But you also leave things out, no women in work force = massive wage spike. The reason wages are so low is because of the large work force. Nursing isn’t an industry, healthcare is, and guess what, it was historically dominated by men. Nice try though.
/r/MensRights19/06/23 09:36 PM
3

I’m saying that you have an irrational fear of strangers whereas men have a rational fear which you’re happy to disregard. The female dominated sectors were male dominated for years, they were given up as women entered the workforce, name me a sector that wasn’t ever male dominated? (Except for a nursery nurse/nanny because most women were full time mothers so they weren’t even required) If women left the work force it would drive wages up, you don’t understand economics or sociology, incredible…
/r/MensRights19/06/23 09:17 PM
7

Again your logic is flawed as statistics show us that as a woman you’re far more likely to be attacked by someone close to you. So you should be more cautious of your mates than strangers. Men not being allowed in the work place? The world’s infrastructure would collapse within 24 hours. Women not being allowed in the work place…the world still survives and thrives. If you were banning one or the other it’s not men that should “logically” be banned.
/r/MensRights19/06/23 09:07 PM
12

All I want you to do is follow it to its logical conclusion. I agree women should be weary of men for the reasons you stated. But you argued that the Tesco employee was out of order for stating the same thing in reverse despite the fact we have the same level of risk but in different ways. Surely you must see that?
/r/MensRights19/06/23 08:27 PM
7

And do you accept that the reason women are weary of all men is because almost are capable of ruining their life and it’s fair to say women should be weary of all men?
/r/MensRights19/06/23 08:20 PM
11

I do understand that, but you’re still yet to understand why men feel uncomfortable around women, we can be falsely accused, we can be victims of SA, and we can’t fight back. It’s a triple threat.
/r/MensRights19/06/23 08:17 PM
18

A man couldn’t make me feel uncomfortable though, I know I can hit a man
/r/MensRights19/06/23 08:14 PM
28

I’m going to put it out there, I currently work on my own and prefer it to working with men or women. So to say men feel uncomfortable working with women is as valid as me saying I feel more comfortable working on my own.
/r/MensRights19/06/23 07:07 PM
44

Except “me too” exists as a campaign and “believe all women” is a very commonly used slogan. Even though in the last few years there have been some very high profile false accusations… Like I said you don’t understand, and your insistence on arguing with me highlights that fully.
/r/MensRights19/06/23 07:02 PM
43

As a 21 year old I had my arse squeezed by a cleaner when working in a factory. She was roughly 50 years old. I told the site foreman and he said “you need to watch out for her, she’s a grabber” and laughed. As a 6ft 2, 16 stone guy that other blokes would feel intimidated by it’s hard to express how much of a joke it really is.
/r/MensRights19/06/23 06:57 PM
61

The only time an allegation of SA against a woman would be taken seriously was if made by another woman or minor. Unwanted touching by women to men is seen as harmless fun. You claim to understand but you have completely failed to comprehend the context and dynamics of the hypothetical situation you suggested. You don’t understand.
/r/MensRights19/06/23 06:53 PM
0

This comment is almost as bad, by “right ideologies” I assume you mean capitalism, whilst it is the most practical way to set up a society out of any that have been tried so far, it also doesn’t have an end point. Economic booms and depressions perfectly highlight this. The moment you allow biases to cloud your judgement you may as well be speaking from a religious viewpoint.
/r/MensRights17/06/23 09:34 PM
21

I actually agree that it teaches a lesson on feminism, it teaches that feminism sees women as above men and the family. Massive self report. Well done, keep up the good work Madame🤣🤣🤣
/r/MensRights11/06/23 11:53 AM
10

Don’t forget to cash the coupon which allows you additional payment for the same job, that’s a big one
/r/MensRights07/06/23 09:45 AM
2

All are welcome who respect the vulnerability of men. The conversations in these threads whilst often a result of outrage, are just a way to vent to others who have mutual respect for each other. It’s mainly wholesome over here.
/r/MensRights04/05/23 05:14 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter