TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

young-earth-atheist Archive

View 0 posts and 66 comments by young-earth-atheist on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

Yes, but today is an even better day for SOMEBODY ELSE to die.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 12:21 AM
0

I just finished Infidel by Ayaan Hirsi Ali. Her experiences in a culture which believes that a woman must be covered from heat to toe because it will lead men into temptation is a truly evil example of rape culture and if feminism is to mean anything at all, privileged women living in the West should be addressing their energies to help women who suffer from genital mutilation, who are at risk of being murdered by their fathers and brothers because of their lifestyles and who must ask permission…
/r/MensRights11/09/12 06:22 AM
1

No. He stopped a little while later...
/r/MensRights03/09/12 08:19 PM
1

Absolutely it was. It was legal kidnapping based completely on a gender bias by women who aren't smart enough to figure out the difference between blood and red felt pen. I had my time wasted, was embarrassed, and worse of all I wasn't allowed to pick up my kids. To be thought of in that way was sickening to me too. Needless to say I was pissed.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 04:24 PM
1

That's not their problem. It's still gender-based discremination. There were two EMT workers in an ambulance who had a reason to be there not a random stranger asking kids if they'd like to see puppies in his van. It sounds more like an over zealous worker who didn't think things through.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 04:11 PM
1

I have. I had the police called on me 'cause I was taking my son home after a huge tantrum he had at the park. They let me go after questioning me for a minute but it was pretty embarrassing. My son was freaked out. He thought they were coming for him because he had a tantrum.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 03:55 PM
2

Yes, I once was not allowed to pick up my kid from daycare because the daycare called child protective services because they found blood on my daughter's pants. Their mother was allowed however. Turns out what they thought was blood was actually red felt pen and after several angry phone calls and emails to the supervisor, I got an apology from them. The social worker at first didn't want to admit her mistake even after I confronted her with the doctor's report stating that the substance was not…
/r/MensRights03/09/12 05:17 AM
1

No it wouldn't. Married people have sex with people who aren't their spouses all the time.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 08:44 PM
1

You have no idea how easy that would make it... Some women will string a guy along and keep them as a back up incase their main relationship fails or even because it boosts their egos. Having her just straight up telling you "i'm not gonna fuck you" would make it a lot easier.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 08:41 PM
1

I hear you. I'd like to be able to rewrite the social rules but I don't think they'd let me.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 08:22 PM
1

Life isn't fair. Both women and men do shitty things to each other in our bizarre mating rituals. Women certainly don't have a monopoly on cruelty. A pretty girl has higher reproductive value than an unattractive one and can be more picky with her mates.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 07:30 PM
1

A lot of communication is subtle body language. If you're a girl. A guy keeps calling you. Is it easier to lie to him or tell him you don't like him to his face and possibly risk another uncomfortable situation? When a guy keeps calling a girl when she hasn't responded to him, he is demonstrating needyness. A huge turn off. Sometimes it's hard to recognize that in our own behavior because, after all, I'm great and I expect other people to see that as well. Obviously, I'm not applying this to all…
/r/MensRights02/09/12 07:07 PM
1

There are times I wish I was gay too.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 12:00 PM
0

I agree that it's a terrible way to do things but they do it because it's safer and they want to avoid conflict, not just because they want to save the other person's feelings.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 11:42 AM
-1

I'm talking about when they first meet. Women test men to see how easy they are to provoke or push around. I see women do it all the time. Asking a guy to hold her purse. Making fun of him in front of her friends. It's a way of weeding out the weak from the strong and of getting to know how a man will react in stressful situations.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 11:12 AM
-1

Yeah, I think that's it pretty much. After getting hit on all the time, they've learnt that being a bitch is the best way to get rid of a guy fast. They also do it sometimes to size up a man. If he gets his feelings hurt he is showing her that he isn't strong enough to stand up to her then he isn't worthy of someone with her market value. She has so many guys after her she has to weed out the socially inferior ones from the guys that stand a chance.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 07:00 AM
2

Shit, sorry that wasn't clear, I didn't mean you per se. I was speaking in more general terms for whoever else read that too. True, but a lot of times people don't say shit directly but drop hints. If you are socially calibrated, you pick up on them. My ex was dropping huge hints and he wasn't getting them. I had to step in and deal with it and even then the loser still didn't get it. That's why you'll see these really hot women who'll become absolute bitches to some poor guy who just wants to t…
/r/MensRights02/09/12 06:08 AM
3

Actually I have to agree with the woman here. That's pretty fucking creepy. Not to say I haven't done anything stupid with women before but it's totally creepy. My ex wife had some loser do something similar while we were together. Dude got her phone number from someone at her work and called her all the time. She asked me to deal with it and I texted him and said look dude she's not interested and is happily married but the fucker didn't give up. It was creepy as fuck. This isn't the same as as…
/r/MensRights02/09/12 03:06 AM
3

Oh no, I can't see some crappy, pretentious art photos of strippers.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 05:19 PM
3

Yeah, children rely on adults for protect so it's perfectly fine to acknowagle that.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 09:53 AM
1

I've been hit on by a gay guy before. I didn't feel threaten; I most felt kinda embarrassed for the him because he was really bad at it. I wasnt scared. I thought it was funny at the time.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 08:43 AM
0

Hmm, I posted it because you used "rapey" to describe a guy staring at a woman's ass and that's fucking stupid. If I stare at your new car does that mean I'm gonna steal it? How do you get from leering at someone to rape?
/r/MensRights14/08/12 08:34 PM
1

There aren't degrees of rape. It's either rape or it's not. It might be stalking or harassment or just creepy behavior depending on the situation but to call it rapey when someone stares at a breasts for a second too long trivializes actual rape.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 11:35 AM
2

I totally agree. The only way you get good at something is by practice. Failure and learning to accept rejection like an adult is part of learning process. If men didn't do this we wouldn't be here.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 11:17 AM
1

Yep, they also like to be hit on if you are good at it.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 11:00 AM
3

You are number six!
/r/MensRights09/08/12 06:52 AM
2

I've never liked him. Something about his face seemed very punchable. Like he reminded me of the douche social studies teacher in high school who used his power to make life difficult for the students he didn't like.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 04:35 PM
5

There is something wrong with having a free-thought movement that tell you how to think on certain issues.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 03:31 PM
22

yeah, it's funny how that works. Police tell you not to leave valuables in plain sight, to lock your doors, to keep your eyes on your bag but god forbid they tell you be on your guard and not get shitfaced in public. Oh my god - victim blamer!
/r/MensRights04/08/12 10:43 PM
0

Of course I didn't mean that. I know 5 minutes isn't right... It has to be closer to 15 to 30 minutes... I think he did the right thing. He stopped the threat to himself in the best way that he could at that time. Which is what I would have done too.
/r/MensRights21/07/12 09:19 AM
4

OMG she didn't deserve that... I mean to not have the beating continue for another 5 minutes.
/r/MensRights21/07/12 05:55 AM
3

I'm pretty sure it's a joke. If not I weep for humanity.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 05:17 AM
1

Godless liberal here.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 08:06 AM
1

yeah, it is exactly the same stuff. Word for word.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 01:57 AM
1

A game for kids on the web.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 01:25 AM
0

It's obviously a joke... No need to get upset about every fuckin' troll on the internet.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 07:05 AM
3

He wasn't convicted though. I remember that story.
/r/MensRights14/07/12 08:05 AM
2

How do you decide who is unfit? IQ? Income? Parents too ugly? It would be a horribly biased system no matter what you did.
/r/MensRights15/06/12 07:29 PM
2

It's a real place. It's dead but it's real.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 05:44 PM
22

Yeah, sorry to say but these are terrible.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 01:35 PM
2

I remember her. She's the one that stole the money from the kids and complained 'cause she had to give it back and had to go to court. DO we have access to this judge's past sentences to see if maybe she is lenient on men too?
/r/MensRights31/05/12 10:52 PM
7

I'd take a mind-numbing job for 40 years and die an early death to keep this woman alive.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 10:20 AM
10

uhmm.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 05:52 AM
1

Yeah, teaching English would be an easy job to get I'd imagine. You'd get paid a lot by local standards too.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 03:34 PM
3

Exactly! You wouldn't listen to me because I'm a neckbeard and therefor my arguments are invalid. That's a great ad hominem. If you just said, "you're fat and girls find you physically repulsive." That would just be abusive however true it may be.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 08:40 PM
1

Actually, it is not an argument it's just me being insulting and abusive. So technically it's not a fallacy.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 08:01 PM
1

In rape cases, perception is nine-tenths of the law. (citation needed) Here is a case in the U.K. in which a man was found not guilty of rape because he thought it was his girlfriend. A jury found him not guilty. And he was more at fault because he went in to the wrong room.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 07:25 PM
1

Yeah, exactly and then I'd say "What the fuck" too and then the person would hear my voice and realize that I wasn't their boyfriend. Saying that he was raped would be like saying a man who dressed up like a deer and ran around in the forest during hunting season was murdered by hunters.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 06:45 PM
1

Perceived and being guilty of something are two different things and I'm not disagreeing with you about how it would be perceived by society at large. What I'm talking about is how the law would see it.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 06:33 PM
1

Read what I wrote. I never said that was the case here nor do I think that this is even real. But hypothetically speaking, if it was exactly like he said, he'd be a huge douche for not telling her and guilty of something, even if it's just being a huge douche. Saying that he was raped would be like saying a man who dressed up like a deer during hunting season was murdered by hunters.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 06:15 PM
1

Well, I'm not saying that that would be the case here per se. I'm saying in a case where a man or woman tricks someone into thinking they are in fact somebody else in order to have sex with them, it would be sexual intercourse against that person's will. Even if the one not giving the consent was the one who initiated the sex. I'm not sure what it would be in this case. I agree there is a huge double standard in how it would be perceived. Men are seen to be the pursuers of sex and women as the g…
/r/MensRights24/04/12 05:46 PM
3

First off, I don't for a second think this is true. But to answer your question: false pretenses. If he didn't say anything even though he knew that she thought it was her boyfriend then he would be guilty of something. I'm not sure what but being a huge douche comes to mind... If he tricked her into thinking that he was her boyfriend in order to have sex with her, I'd have no problem calling that rape because it was non-consensual sex.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 04:50 PM
2

It's not ad hominem, it's just abuse. In order to be ad hominem it has to be part of the argument used against her position (e.g. her arguments aren't valid because she is unattractive.) Edit: Whoever downvoted me is an idiot.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 02:57 PM
5

I was a stay-at-home dad for about a year. I can tell you that there is a huge double standard. Women are a lot less trusting of a man watching their kids. My son would often go on play dates at other people's houses but rarely did they want their kids to go to my house. I was at a huge disadvantage in making friends and I'm sure I pissed off a lot of husbands when I was invited over along with my son for play dates. In the end I made friends. Still, it annoyed the hell out of me to be under con…
/r/MensRights20/04/12 12:42 AM
2

Yep, this is exactly it. I think part of the reason feminism started to gain popularity had to do with the automation of the work force. Before that women didn't want to fight for the same jobs as men because they were dangerous and hard. You go to a country where automation hasn't taken off yet and none of the women want to have those jobs. They'd rather stay at home and take care of the the children and who could blame them.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 10:19 AM
1

I'm too lazy to find the ole reddit switchroo link.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 03:58 AM
1

Burger King should hire him cause he served up some all-beef fatties in supersized whopper...
/r/MensRights04/12/11 06:58 PM
11

Yes.
/r/MensRights21/10/11 08:08 PM
14

It means women use to just be pieces of meat. Now they are people.
/r/MensRights21/10/11 05:15 PM
1

found a picture of him at the smoking gun
/r/MensRights18/10/11 08:48 AM
2

Burger King needs to hire this man quick because he just gave them a double-whopper.
/r/MensRights18/10/11 08:40 AM
14

Man, all this does is give men's rights a bad name. I want to see my kids more not run off to Asia.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 06:02 PM
1

Stop putting words in my month and misrepresenting my opinion... There is a big difference between organizing a protest and just being foolish. Civil disobedience works because there are enough people breaking the law that it becomes hard for them to all be arrested. Then there is the media attention that garners new sympathy to their cause. My point was that you may have the right to wave around large wads of cash in a bad neighborhood but if you act surprised when you get mugged, you are an id…
/r/MensRights20/09/11 04:56 AM
3

It's not victim blaming. It is common sense... Maybe I should have chosen a better word than slutty but the point still stands. Lets change the analgolgy from bad neighborhood to Muslim country like Saudi Arabia. They should have a right to dress however they want but if you walked around there in a bikini, I'd call you an idiot.
/r/MensRights19/09/11 11:45 PM
-2

I mean both are accurate. Nobody is saying that the rapists and muggers aren't scum. Just that it's a bad idea to walk around with wads of cash in your hand in a bad neighborhood. It's also a bad idea to get wasted and be slutty in a bad neighborhood. Nobody is saying that they got what they deserved. Only that they should exercise more caution because the world isn't perfect.
/r/MensRights19/09/11 08:56 PM
-2

As soon as I saw the sentence I knew she was going to be hot. If she were 300 pounds with a mullet she probably would have gotten more time.
/r/MensRights27/01/11 05:53 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter