TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

youngthugtranslator Archive

View 0 posts and 375 comments by youngthugtranslator on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Hardcore misogyny is alive and well.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/15 07:07 PM
4

Give me some examples then since you're so sure if we just waltz right over we'll find "kill all men" plain as day
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/15 06:38 PM
1

Your personal experience is not enough to somehow magically make similar experiences of women go away.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/15 05:25 AM
1

Men made up 51% of the vote in 1980, and 9% of the Senate, and NOW tried to bring this to legislation but it was shot down? I'm tired of repeating myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/15 03:11 AM
1

I'm not saying women didnt influence, the vote, I'm saying they are not and were not the primary ones at fault for no women in the draft.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/15 02:59 AM
1

I did, its done, you show me the data women voters caused no women in the draft.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/15 02:43 AM
1

There was one woman in the Senate. You are pinning this on women and women voters. Show me the proof.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/15 02:42 AM
0

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arranged_marriage Really?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/15 02:39 AM
2

source? And source to prove these women had any choice in who they had kids with? Because you know damn well they didn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/15 02:25 AM
1

they are the lawmakers. they get the final say on most of this. You're just making excuses now for them to blame women, without any proof. What about men who probably called in and said no thanks, no women pls? Do you honestly think that didn't happen? Do you have any proof it was exclusively women? Hell, look at how long it took to allow women in combat. Did exclusively women oppose that? Fuck, RPers and MRAs talk all the time about how women shouldn't be in the military. Put up or shut up abou…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/15 02:15 AM
9

Lol says who you literally never share any evidence besides your own experience
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/15 12:43 AM
0

http://now.org/about/history/highlights/ 1980. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_Senators_in_the_96th_Congress_by_seniority One woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/15 12:37 AM
1

How can you call it truth when its just your personal experience? This conversation is bullshit, you have nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/15 06:31 PM
1

So the front page of a biased site like reddit and your own anecdote? Welp.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/15 06:13 PM
1

Where's your evidence for any of this
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/15 05:57 PM
1

Because they turn women into sexual objects who deny them something they believed they're entitled to, not "women control sex". Also you're ignoring every instance where a woman goes crazy for a guy, like the chick astronaut who wore a diaper and I think planned to kill another astronaut who's husband she loved and subsequently wanted to fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/15 02:58 PM
1

Thats not an undeniable fact, so every rambling after that is just your own bias.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/15 01:32 AM
0

NOW tried to be included in the draft in the 1980s, and got shot down by male legislation. No one's fault besides male solipsism.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/15 01:30 AM
3

Homo humini lupus said women would eventually be hunted for sport once artifical uteri were invented, so no.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/15 01:28 AM
0

No point in arguing with you. You seem to think how you treat people is some universal quality.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 11:47 PM
1

"Red pill gets results!"
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 11:31 PM
5

If women were barred from the military, university, politics, being doctors, owning property, and participating in voting for the sole fact they were women, they gave a fuck about gender back then.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 11:24 PM
3

Thats cool. My dad and his dad before him don't either. But men are so honorable. :(
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 11:21 PM
7

Women don't raise children and make up a large portion of teachers and nurses which fucking teach you and take care of you when you're sick?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 11:20 PM
4

You don't think women buy shit to get men? Or are advertised to get shit for men?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 11:18 PM
1

Cool stats on your hilary clinton statement bro!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 11:15 PM
0

"Time to get to know them" implies interaction. If you have none or limited ones, no, you shouldn't be making judgments, and no, I don't really care what you think human nature actually is, I know that I don't have the 20/20 vision to call all women sluts until proven otherwise from her saying, "hi, how are you" to me. Your shit behavior isn't as universal as you think it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 11:14 PM
2

Women "earned" the right to be barred from the military?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 11:12 PM
4

lol "why do so many people assume things, here let me go assume things" maybe thats why i'm not arguing with you anymore? Take the hint, your argument is entirely dependent on you assuming, the most delicious of irony. One last time, buh bye
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 01:14 PM
2

Well i misinterpreted your comment but no, its not a strawman when you literally just said some people think that way
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 01:09 PM
9

never said it applied to each and every unlovable man who are you even talking to at this point
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 12:56 PM
2

You think I haven't been to an incel blog or seen an incel man post here? Give me a break, the only one doing any assuming is you. Bye bye.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 12:56 PM
4

Yeah. I find it. I physically view it. Its not an assumption.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 12:49 PM
7

Its funny you're complaining about us assuming, so you just assume we've never been to those sites. Do you even think its hard to type in reddit.com/r/theredpill or something
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 12:46 PM
5

its tricky because the real answer is you can't translate him, you can only listen and let the tongue of the holy ghost flow through you
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 12:33 PM
5

I have sympathy for men who try to change their situation. Going to TRP or FA and whining about female hypergamy and why she said no before sex are not the only ways to "change yourself". What a dishonest response.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 12:23 PM
4

Then why is it when NOW tried to have a female draft in the 70s, that got shot down by a predominately male legislature, but that's still all women's fault Correction: http://now.org/about/history/highlights/ See 1980.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 12:17 PM
2

Uh plenty of ECs do believe women shouldnt vote, so this isnt just a case of "a few idiots in a group"
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 12:14 PM
2

Processing... Processing... No. Only part I get is "on the top of mountain puffin on clouds and..." then it goes to shit
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 12:08 PM
4

So what you're saying is no, men weren't barred from voting on the basis on gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 12:07 PM
4

Would you vote for a woman president
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 12:07 PM
8

I think I made it pretty clear that if they're obviously being pieces of shit, I have no sympathy for them. No where did I say I was just assuming so.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 12:06 PM
11

Why should I have sympathy for someone who doesn't believe that other people experience suffering (ex. no woman has a tough time in the dating market, but no fat chicks) I have sympathy for lonely men who are genuinely nice people and haven't let the negativity get the best of them. I don't have a single ounce of sympathy for a man who walks into the Red Pill or Forever Alone and creates an echo chamber for how their loneliness is some female conspiracy.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 04:43 AM
7

Man that's so awfully convenient isn't it? Let's prevent women from doing things, then, because they couldn't do those things, we can claim they aren't capable and prevent them from doing other things. And RP is all about female solipsism...
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 04:40 AM
7

Could those men not vote because specifically they were men
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 04:36 AM
4

Do you actually have a stat on that Hilary thing Also how do you know they don't actually agree with her? Oh right you can't get in their heads, you're making it up. I assume any man you voted for you voted for because you're a man?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 02:09 AM
5

Endorsed contributor
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 01:58 AM
6

According to who
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 01:58 AM
5

I guess my point is is this your fantasy or do you actually think this is feasible without corruption
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 01:52 AM
7

So the wealthy get to vote in more buddies to dictate who can and cannot vote
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 01:49 AM
6

Why
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 01:48 AM
7

Who would vote in the powers at be into those institutions to limit who and who cannot vote
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 01:44 AM
8

Dictated by who
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 01:40 AM
6

College educated people are more likely to vote liberal or progressive, so I assume if you have a degree, you'd gladly remove the right to vote from yourself also.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 01:40 AM
9

Uh demonspawn and archwinger and aerobus believe women shouldn't vote and they're EC.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 01:39 AM
3

There will never be a benevolent dictator free from wrongdoing or abuse. That's a fantasyland. Denying women the right to vote was the question, not "what's wrong with democracy", and yet the first 5 answers or so didn't actually answer the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 01:39 AM
6

Its only like the still COMPLETELY GENDER NEUTRAL DIVORCE LAWS were written in a time when it was expected that a woman stay at home and she had no other options, a feeling still largely prevelant today, so the only way to ensure that she wasn't fucking destitute post-divorce (you know, a divorce extremely hard to get at the time) was to fight for alimony. Which by the way, alimony is only granted in less than 20% of divorce proceedings, and yet you're more than willing to strip away a woman's r…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 01:22 AM
2

Absolute bullshit you aren't trying to force your ways on society. A man says he's more blue pill or feminist, "lol see you in 20 years bro", "you're actually really unhappy and you don't know it", "white knight faggot", "you're only doing it to get laid".
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 01:09 AM
6

You mean all the laws that are gender neutral in language? Right okay. So I assume women should prevent men from voting since 30 some states allow rapists to fight for custody of children conceived from their rapes? Or laws that prevent them from seeking abortions?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 01:06 AM
10

You shouldn't be making judgments on people you have no interactions with at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 12:19 AM
2

That's obviously the women's fault and not your own beliefs at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 12:17 AM
4

Datable to who? You? This is my point, you want women to submit to your interests to support your lifestyle, when men don't even have a universal consensus on what they want. Pure selfishness, nothing else to say about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 10:50 PM
1

We are not talking about the same idea of broken at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 10:28 PM
3

How about we don't believe in things like broken men or women?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 10:06 PM
5

Cool goalpost moving. First it was being childlike, now its about vulnerability. I give up, you're never going to accept men do beauty regiments that are unnatural and unnecessary to be attractive, in the same way as make up. I even reminded you of other examples and you ignored them. Not worth my time.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 09:28 PM
5

You shave a face to look more childlike.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 09:24 PM
6

That's all fine and dandy until RPers start calling women who don't adhere to their idea of femininity broken.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 09:20 PM
12

yeah those vary within a group, too, so we're still talking about the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 09:14 PM
3

Does she compliment you by only doing things you find acceptable for her to do, not vice versa? Would you be a stay at home dad for a career woman if she asked?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 09:14 PM
5

Yes it is. Men saw it as something women found attractive, so they shaved their faces. This is manipulative. Also thanks for ignoring the examples of cologne and deoderant and go fitting clothes!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 09:13 PM
12

Do you treat all men and all women differently based on preconceived notions of what is right for both genders regardless of their actual individual strengths and weaknesses? So you're saying telling the valedictorian girl who is a physics prodigy to not do STEM because its for boys is better for society than accepting people on a case by case basis, which in a modern society, isn't even hard to do?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 09:09 PM
5

So basically you're saying men are too illogical to know that winged eyeliner and coral red lips aren't natural, just like their shaved faces. Mmkay. Also shaved faces mimic youthfulness. The standard in business came after the standard of it looking appealing.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 09:03 PM
4

"Women are retards who crave abuse" but that's none of my business.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 09:02 PM
3

You give abuse of women a free pass if its done by TRPers.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 08:57 PM
4

No but men do it anyway, but if youre gonna play that game, a lot of women are asked to shave their legs and pubic region by men. And if it isn't sexually manipulative, then why don't men go on first dates full beard to let women know "the real them" before shaving? Anyway I'm not going to demonize women for girl game, but I'll demonize women who use girl game for using it if it includes misandry and the abuse of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 08:55 PM
3

Yes it is. A lot of women are turned off by excessive facial hair.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 08:47 PM
3

Yes they are. Thats not your natural face without you taking action doing something unnatural. That isn't what you actually look like. That isn't what you actually smell like. Most men use deoderant and shave daily, so its not even less frequent than women wearing make up.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 07:58 PM
3

So basically you have a problem with people choosing to be parts of groups they aren't born into, not the women themselves. Again. Like I said, not all women are feminists, not all women buy those magazines, not all women wear make up (and men shave, wear deoderant, dress accordingly, style their hair, wear cologne, so this is a stupid point).
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 07:55 PM
4

RP is a choice you make. Being a woman is not. These are not comparable in any way.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 07:47 PM
1

And women are taught to sacrifice their livelihoods, their careers, their sexuality, their time and energy for appearances (also applies to men so this is probably universal), and their bodies to men to become good wives and good mothers. To say women are taught not to sacrifice to much is ridiculous. The whole paragraph. You left lines of it out. But anyway since you aren't admitting you ignored what I said when its plain as day, see ya.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 07:41 PM
1

I brought real issues to the table and you called them 50s notions. Don't pretend that didn't happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 07:27 PM
1

Generalizations can be made of a group, but you better be ready to change your mind about an individual if they defeat your preconceived notions rather than spin everything as "well AWALT because they're all capable of it"
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 07:26 PM
2

The problem is you think a woman is only worth something if she perfectly compliments a man by doing everything he doesn't want to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 07:25 PM
11

no one BP supports women doing the same shit towards men. This is only an excuse for you guys to weasle your way out of accepting the responsibility of being part of TRP. "well they do it too!" So? Rich people get away with murder, it doesn't mean Joe Schmoe should try.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 07:23 PM
1

How can I argue with someone who can't answer the first question I asked them about the social constructs they think are so crucial to society?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 09:20 PM
0

If OP is saying "people are getting less x" and can't qualify to me what x is, damn right I'm gonna ask. Its not lazy to not answer your deflection, especially when you guys are too lazy to give me an answer to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 09:17 PM
-2

You go on a subreddit that is all about pedestalizing women. More so than ever before. You fucking study them like zoo animals to get in their head to find out how to fuck them quicker. To say you don't care about what people, especially women, think about you is laughable.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 09:11 PM
0

Hormones mean nothing when there is variation within a single gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 09:05 PM
1

That's cool. Women face social pressures to be "real women" too hence my comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 09:04 PM
-4

Unrelated, evasive topic. Next.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 09:03 PM
0

If no one can provide me evidence of what they are definitively, then I am going to believe they are socially constructed. That is my evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 09:02 PM
3

You claimed western women didn't have any significant problems. You had your mind made up before anyone ever told you. You didnt even look into the issue. I had to tell you.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 09:02 PM
-5

Yes you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 09:00 PM
2

Hot women also have other opinions about life than who to bang.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 09:00 PM
0

Happy wife happy life is hotly contested by young people. It doesn't even get uttered anymore without someone calling bullshit. And cool you posted /r/relationships examples. I assume you also tried to look for ones where boyfriends neglected their girlfriends since you're so adamant only men face this problem?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 06:14 PM
4

You guys wonder why no one wants to argue with you? Make a claim, provide evidence. This isn't on me since I don't believe in masculinity and femininity as anything other than social constructs.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 06:04 PM
4

I'm sorry you're so misinformed. Abortion clinics are closing fast in America due to (male led) legislation in conservative states. Women have incredibly difficult times finding a doctor willing to tie her tubes at any age before 40 because "she might change her mind", but vasectomies are readily available. Fake abortion clinics stunted a woman's ability to have one for years, though this problem is slowly being fixed. Male rapists have the right to fight for custody of the children produced by …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 05:59 PM
3

Because I called you out? Sorry for the hurt feelings. :(
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 05:46 PM
2

I did. You ignored them and pretended they don't exist. No point in talking to someone so dismissive of issues that don't effect them while so dedicated to a group who wanks over any perceived slight towards men (DAE creepshaming is real???)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 05:41 PM
3

Says who
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 05:40 PM
0

What is feminine and what is masculine and I want evidence, not your opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 05:20 PM
1

A major example of promiscuity that results in divorce lies with men who cheat.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 05:16 PM
4

Oh so all people who are BP are trolls when they go to TRP? Good to know, really supports your idea that dissent is allowed.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 05:14 PM
3

Yeah youre not actually interested in discussing what women go through, you just picked a shitty example of some random issue feminists raised and are completely ignoring any other genuine complaint they've had for the state of women in the Western world. Quelle surprise.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 05:13 PM
1

Its funny how often RP men talk about women not being able to empathize with them or understand their struggle, and yet you are so adamant this doesn't happen nowadays.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 04:42 PM
1

I don't believe the proportions are different. And women are taught to sacrifice their livelihoods, their careers, their sexuality, their time and energy for appearances (also applies to men so this is probably universal), and their bodies to men to become good wives and good mothers. To say women are taught not to sacrifice to much is ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 04:14 PM
2

Married women complain about the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 02:37 PM
5

https://www.np.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/1vdgjq/youre_new_here_welcome_now_shut_up_read_this/ Absolute bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 02:28 PM
3

Your argument: BP complains about a circlejerk, avoids debate, avoids dissenting opinions, "can't win debates" lol Mine: RP says the same shit about any other subreddit, about college (its run by feminazis!!!), about talking to women And yeah haha okay they totally don't ban anyone who questions ECs or says "thats kind of sexist guys" very funny joke
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 02:15 PM
5

While not allowing any dissent inside. My argument stands.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 02:05 PM
6

Never seen a BPer on reddit ever say a man should take care of his SO and not have the care reciprocated. Give me an example.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 02:04 PM
1

The best example we currently have would probably be Iceland actually
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 02:01 PM
6

Sounds exactly like the whole red pill subreddit
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 01:50 PM
-2

Lol you think thats skepticism that's fucking rich
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 01:49 PM
3

If yall are so fucking concerned with proving how correct you are, make dissenting opinions and questioning ECs and being a feminist and stating your womanhood in /r/theredpill something that won't get you banned. I don't give a damn about your deeply, deeply emotional (DAE men are the only logical gender) "men's space". If men are so damn logical, a men's space would be happy to openly debate anyone who questions their beliefs without resorting to banning and name-calling.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 01:48 PM
1

Where am I wrong here? Are you saying you don't have the choice to be a stay at home man? Or that the laws are gender specific?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/15 01:10 AM
1

Typical male solipsism, thinking they know what women actually like.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/15 12:17 AM
-1

good fathers are the one of the most stereotypical troupes of a "hot guy" in the media woman universe.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/15 12:14 AM
6

encouraging people to find the best way to get laid isnt slutty behavior? Men are sluts, well technically manwhores. They dole out their sex like currency to women at clubs, on tinder, send dick pics online, hoping to get sexual pleasure in exchange for this currency. In return they get physical pleasure. See, men can't empathize with how hard it is for women to get off, but they're so solipsistic they don't even care. They will actually kill people to get laid. They lie and manipulate women whi…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/15 12:13 AM
1

I know i was being silly
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/15 11:37 PM
2

That magazine is stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/15 11:27 PM
4

sleep around without consequence. hence sluts. they are sluts.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/15 11:01 PM
4

yeah and i mean TRP just lets men be sluts anyway
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/15 10:46 PM
-1

Wait you mean the genderless divorce laws where the working spouse, regardless of gender, pays the spouse with less income alimony, keeping in mind that again the law is completely free of gender and you are perfectly capable of being a stay at home man?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/15 10:45 PM
9

These campaigns are not for making you find certain defined people attractive, its so that you acknowledge a bias in how you interact and work with people who are not attractive to you in the first place. People are not born to please your genitals.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/15 09:44 PM
1

Your original comment did not say nonconsensual.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/15 09:38 PM
1

You didnt say consensual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/15 09:35 PM
1

It doesnt matter, you're against the concept of something because it is a barrier before having sex. That is your justification for being against it. Be logically consistent.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/15 05:01 PM
3

in fact they are so *superior that they will literally kill people and start wars if they dont get laid
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/15 12:33 PM
1

um the point of their post was to just point out both genders have made shitty judgment calls. so how is your comment necessary when OP did not deny women are included in the group "both genders"?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/15 12:32 PM
2

the post was about is it good women get to choose who they have sex with, not necessarily how many people they have sex with. do you actually agree it is bad that women, even if it is one long term partner, are worse off if they get to choose who they sleep with
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/15 06:42 AM
0

lmao Read all of OP's replies. They're trying and the only person being lazy about this is you because its easier to accept that you're all dark, brooding mysterylords than accept some people don't understand you but are willing to try. This is pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/15 06:37 AM
1

spreek jij nederlands who am i kidding you probably do
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/15 06:02 AM
1

by that logic, you also hate rape laws
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/15 06:01 AM
1

Twenty years old. Undergrad. Democratic, but I'm not a die-hard and will vote on principal more than party. I have voted for local conservative-leaning candidates before. I come from a half Mexican, half Russian household. I wouldn't call myself a feminist because I am not engaged in any feminist activism, but I am generally supportive of it. I think the tumblr/SJW/SRS boogeymen are just that, boogeymen. They're either 15 year olds with internet access who are in a shitty, confusing period in th…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/15 05:10 AM
0

I have never had a post deleted to my knowledge, but I probably have and am stupid. I feel like the moderating here is fair. There are a lot of people on both sides that I think need to be banned, I won't name names.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/15 05:05 AM
1

Then the problem is the fat, not the skin color. But the skin color is more often brought up, regardless of size.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/15 05:03 AM
2

Maybe not expensive escorts with big name "companies" overseeing who their clients become, but cheaper prostitutes are definitely used to this.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/15 01:10 AM
2

Only time I've ever seen "on break" couples work out are when either a major tragedy has happened to one party and they need to sort out their emotions (death of family or friend, homelessness, etc.) or when the couple is newly long distance and trying to handle their emotions. Any other time, its a train wreck.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/15 01:08 AM
2

Especially since the "on break" boyfriend is an adult who can make the decision whether or not to go back to her.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/15 01:06 AM
1

A cherry pick.. On the front page at 300 upvotes... With no dissent in the comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/15 01:08 AM
1

No, how exactly do you derive that from me simply not agreeing with her entirely
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 12:18 PM
3

I have been fucked over by girls. And men, too. But I don't get on a forum that takes that one minute experience with a person and feeds the entire group they were born with to the dogs. Funny how you conveniently forget all the times men have been shitty to you. Guess girls are an easy target because you can just call them stuck up bitches for not wanting to be judged by the actions of another and high five some other dudes who couldn't respect a girls space and got shot down.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 04:46 AM
2

No they aren't. And don't call me "buddy", I don't like you and you're a crappy person.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 04:33 AM
6

You aren't addressing them at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 04:17 AM
5

Well they aren't me and you're talking to me and completely avoiding all the points coming from me
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 04:13 AM
5

Cool. So you're not arguing with me, someone who never agreed with this, you just want to complain about some hypothetical feminists
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 03:58 AM
5

I never said I agree with the 77 cents stat, so who are you even arguing with right now
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 03:54 AM
3

Sorry I have respect for women and don't need emotionally manipulative tactics to make them like me and wouldn't use them even if they didn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 03:54 AM
4

Stop constantly toting around "this is why I don't respect x" whenever x is arguing with you. And also, the issues we discuss here are not black and white issues with one right answer. So your example is useless.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 03:48 AM
3

No, The Red Pill does not have its "bad days". AWALT, dread game, maintaining frame, women are like children, are all sidebar material and heavy parts of red pill lingo. You're being willingly ignorant here, and none of the advice you just handed me is exclusive to TRP or a new concept you couldn't find anywhere else without side barring on how to flirt with other women to make your property, err, girlfriend jealous.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 03:47 AM
6

Obviously there can be no middle ground where a person makes a different conclusion than you from the same situational observations. Absolutely absurd!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 03:45 AM
12

You only think she's logically because she completely conforms to your beliefs and your perception of how women should act. Next.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 03:37 AM
2

Oh so what you're saying is even though the post had almost no internal dissent and was on the front page at 300 upvotes and its an ideology you choose to subscribe to and are not born with, Not All Red Pullers Are Like That? Yet you put yourself in a group that totes AWALT based on shitty personal generalizations and self-selected life experience?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 03:31 AM
12

"Normal women"? Yeah when you subscribe to a group that calls women retards who crave abuse, I wanna know what you view "normal" as.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 03:29 AM
4

I have one SO of a few years
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 03:28 AM
7

Calling women retards who crave abuse is hateful. You're playing ignorant here.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 03:26 AM
6

No one is saying its okay when women make sexist remarks about all men based on their own personal experience, hence why the red pill is also sexist.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 03:25 AM
5

You seem to be under the impression all of them think its just a metaphor.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 01:30 AM
0

Um this fund is specifically for educating girls. No one is denying boys have issues, but this discussion is about education.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/15 03:36 PM
4

No. Most boys in the countries affected by this have more access to education than girls.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/15 03:08 PM
1

It was probably deleted.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/15 06:09 AM
1

Lol you're complaining about the reasons behind divorce, not the legality of the divorce itself. Its simple, more men commit adultery, so they're breaking their vows. Quit moving goal posts.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/15 12:59 AM
1

I wasn't trying to do a gotcha, stop taking everything so personally. I was just genuinely curious why you said one job, and then the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 04:06 PM
2

If you manage to marry a woman younger than you, you'll be in the same boat as her in terms of age with children. Not really a good argument to tell her to settle down, but not a man. Also about a week ago, you said you change skylight windows for a living,not insurance.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 03:50 PM
1

Here's a citation for you. Gonna be really easy to find. Find anywhere in my comments where I said foreign men are lining up to marry older women, and not where I say older women are seeking sex tourism.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 02:43 PM
1

Lol you missed the entire comment above that to make a crappy joke. Well done.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 02:41 PM
3

But men, the group more likely to be unfaithful, are definitely not breaking those vows, right? Or the men who are more likely to leave a sick spouse than a woman? Even with the whole, you know, til death do us part?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 02:39 PM
3

Um some women do pay for escorts in foreign countries? Is this a joke? Am I supposed to have my feelings hurt or feel defeated by a guy who won't give a citation in a debate sub when asked for one?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 04:34 AM
8

Nope you don't get to play the "its just common sense" card. Citation pls.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 04:20 AM
2

You can understand what I'm saying, they're not random. And yeah that's its intended goal, that's not what I use it for.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 03:09 AM
2

I don't go for the comedy, I go for the shock value. More pisspoor assumptions and kindergarten level insults from you I guess! But good try, maybe you'll get your psychoanalysis of me right one day.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 03:05 AM
2

You're trying really hard to assume my tastes here. I don't like gendered comedy. I don't like comedy centered around feminism. I couldnt care less if the comedy I find funny or not is a feminist when enjoying comedy.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 03:02 AM
0

I don't like feminist comedy.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 02:58 AM
1

Havig a feminist bias does not mean BPs sole purpose is to advance feminism. And what social sciences are you talking about that are disregarded? Also you completely abandoned the idea of my taste in comedy, but that's fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 02:56 AM
1

None of us get life advice from comedians and then disregard the social science for being feminized, and BP isn't a world ideology with an agenda, so we're not going to universally agree on a taste in comedy. "Your" version would literally be just directed towards me to be accurate, not "your" as in TBP. Or are you asking for solely my taste in comedy?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 02:39 AM
1

Bullshit, /r/shitcosmosays is a sub on a site that is almost 70% male, so I bet you at least a few dudes take their time going there. And it doesn't matter if its the female version of TRP, no BPer I've ever seen agrees with it or its readers about life advice, so you bringing it up is a complete distraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 02:24 AM
2

You mean where are the equivalents of comedians where you get all your life advice from and not social scientists because "you just can't trust them, social science is plagued by feminazis"? We have none.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 02:22 AM
-2

No one is talking about Cosmo or brought it up except you.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 01:50 AM
2

You mean the sub making fun of you isn't funny to you???? Damn better let them know to start catering to specifically your tastes.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 01:48 AM
3

http://wwwwww.np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/32jcbk/why_doesnt_bluepill_provide_analysis_on_posts/cqbs77w Here is a comment literally only a comment or two up in the same chain and I didn't see any complaints about circlejerking there from you.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 01:46 AM
0

Then men cannot empathize with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/15 02:14 PM
1

http://www.np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/31l4es/why_is_being_shallow_considered_a_negative_thing/cq2l8ed It wasn't OP I was referring to.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/15 02:09 PM
1

I wouldn't slap you... or knock you unconscious and drag your body through a hotel. You're asking the wrong person, though. Also, no link?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/15 10:33 PM
1

Spitting on someone does not warrant hitting them until they're not conscious. Also link to the video? I might have seen it, but it's been a while.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/15 05:15 AM
6

The adjectives you said are not even in the same category as the ones GridReXX pointed out.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/15 05:10 AM
0

The video proved rice hit her first after she spit on him.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/15 02:22 PM
1

What a cool self-selected variable you chose.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/15 01:17 PM
0

Women are exceedingly better language learners than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/15 01:14 PM
0

Find me a feminist that believes women and men are completely equal, which you keep conflating with identical.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/15 01:12 PM
0

I assume you're a coal miner then? Since you seem to be piggybacking on their hard work and not yours to prove a point, and the only common trait you have with those people is the sex you didn't choose to be born with.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/15 01:11 PM
1

What does being hipster having anything to do with someone's credibility? What does someone's diet even have to do with being hipster?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/15 12:33 PM
0

The question wasn't who provides the sperm, it was "can a woman impregnate a woman"
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/15 12:31 PM
-1

I'm not "following you", this is a small sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/15 12:30 PM
0

Why can't both problems be solved? Also where did I "bitch and moan"? More child like behavior, exaggerating everyone who disagrees with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/15 03:25 AM
1

Ah aight sorry for the harshness.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/15 01:51 AM
-1

The 77% gap is a myth. Its roughly 92-95%. Still a gap.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/15 01:42 AM
0

I never ever mentioned the 77% figure so why are you telling me this
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/15 01:42 AM
2

Lol you understand the wage gap deals with both genders working the same job right?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/15 01:03 AM
-3

Debate with me like an adult. I thought women were the children? Also your statistics have got zero to do with this specific girl. You can generalize all you want and make assumptions, but your generalizations are not absolutes, so when you say "all a woman has to do is not be fat and not be a bitch" to a woman who just said she had a tough time, you are being solipsistic, not the other way around. Edit: also your analogy is worthless. If you took a poll of a presidential election, some people a…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/15 10:06 PM
0

Ah so men have no ability for those basketball teams of babies and are less harmed by STDs, so they must really like lying about their partner count.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/15 09:50 PM
-4

Really, all a woman has to do to get laid is 1) don't be too fat, 2) don't be a bitch. If she does that, she will find a willing partner. You haven't met every woman in the world, in every subculture, at every age, witnessed her life, and made an accurate judgment call of the situation after viewing both sides. And yet you say, "all a woman has to do..." Your experience means nothing. You are one person. You have not done any formal research. You are calling this girl solipsistic, and yet here y…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/15 09:46 PM
1

Yeah its called a sperm bank and a turkey baster.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/15 09:00 PM
0

Your sentences contradict each other here. You are imposing your experience onto women. You tell them its insanely easy, per your second sentence.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/15 08:58 PM
1

Well I concede that. You said she wasn't fit at all. She's fit. So its up to you now to settle on whether you wanna be wrong or right about this.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/15 08:28 PM
1

Considering she's still in the fit zone and the healthy zone... Don't think you know as much about woman's fitness as you think you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/15 06:30 PM
1

No ones talking about body fat. We're talking about the flat stomach she definitely has. BTW 24% is still at the admittedly lower end of fit.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/15 06:27 PM
1

How is it not solipsism to believe you understand a woman's experience better than women? You're basing everything about women entirely on your own devices, like it or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/15 06:25 PM
1

No they're based on height and weight. Taller people are also wider. They will have larger sizes. You have no idea how women's sizing works clearly, please stop talking about an issue you don't know about.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/15 06:21 PM
1

Are you serious right now? She's fit as hell.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/15 06:20 PM
1

How does having free choice in a sex/life partner contradict that person still wanting to be choosy in who their sex/life partner is
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/15 06:20 PM
1

Why would we trust your judgment on the matter exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/15 03:51 PM
1

Marilyn is almost a foot shorter than her. Your comparison is weak.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/15 03:50 PM
3

You mean the over 6'0 amazonian chick with a flat stomach and thighs that, god forbid, touched? Yeah the fact she was slammed for her weight when she's still fit as hell tells me fat acceptance is not accepted.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/15 03:49 PM
1

No it isn't. Lena Dunham got slammed for her size and the fact she was so criticized for it was more widely published than her actual comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/15 03:47 PM
0

I believe you, I guess my point was just that guys still do it. TRP might slap them on the wrist for it, but they still have that impulse. No one is immune from the crybaby phase.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/15 03:37 PM
2

No it isn't. TRP believes certain traits make a person desirable and anything else is an extreme outlier, BP rejects that notion. There is no "traits don't matter for a mate!" mantra at TBP.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/15 12:16 PM
1

How in the everliving fuck is that a RP exclusive theory?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/15 11:30 AM
1

"For people looking for more." That's your own variable BTW that's not what tinder is generally used for. So if they're looking for something more, maybe they want a guy who can pass down tallness to their offspring. Why does there even need to be a reasoning behind it? Its the truth, it sucks, life isn't fair.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/15 11:18 AM
3

Where did anyone make a comment in this thread about how RPers look?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/15 11:06 AM
3

"Women are the ones who complain about shallowness."
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/15 11:03 AM
1

Doesn't matter. Its tinder, its a hook up app, you're looking to get laid, not find a soul mate.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/15 03:46 AM
5

http://www.np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/31i3cs/bp_if_women_arent_as_shallow_as_trp_suggests_how/ You could have literally scrolled down a few posts and have realized you were wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/15 03:43 AM
1

Believing all women have the same opinions is probably part of your problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/15 05:15 PM
4

Or its you using it to disregard a woman's opinion. Same as you do with "women can't tell you about women." You just don't actually want to listen to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/15 12:32 PM
3

I don't believe you by the way this story sounds made up as hell. Regardless its not a hook up for life app, its a hook up because I want dick app. Certainly you didn't swipe on any overweight women though.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/15 12:31 PM
0

Lol GLO's comments have all been circlejerking but you haven't said a damn thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/15 12:24 PM
1

More and more modern women live on their own, they have to do all their chores for themselves. Also head over to /r/relationships and try to read up on how often a woman wants to reasonably split chores with her immature husband, and he throws a tantrum.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/15 12:22 PM
1

Yeah so what were your standards like
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 10:32 PM
2

In the grand scheme of things, a woman would be known as the optimal parent, so she'd get first dibs. My point is red pillers fight tooth and nail like the system is against them. In the grand scheme of things, no one would even question this system. They'd just accept it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 10:22 PM
2

I thought I made it pretty clear in what I'm trying to do. And why should we? You seem to be fine with biology when it benefits you, but not when it doesn't, that's what I'm getting at here. If you truly believed that biology was the last thing driving us, then unless a woman was incapacitated or dead or threatening to kill the kids, she should get the kids. Period. Legal issues shouldn't take anything else into account here because there would be nothing else to take into account. "Okay she's t…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 10:07 PM
1

Ah yes then I agree. But I would say more often than not negatively.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 09:48 PM
2

No it doesn't. Women are considered the primary child rearers and caretakers. If you're going to argue biology, you gotta take the good with the bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 09:44 PM
1

Yeah. Selfishness. I know you're not arguing for or against, I just think its stupid and child like.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 09:33 PM
3

Yeah if its not for her liking, then what is it doing in a sexual strategy ideology? That's my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 09:25 PM
1

None of those qualities equate to how you actively treat a woman regardless.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 09:22 PM
3

So make her learn to like something she didn't? Seems pretty shitty and selfish.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 09:16 PM
2

I know you were being sarcastic. I'm telling you you'd still find someone who would fuck you even if all that happened. Im not saying it will be the hottest girl, I'm saying a girl will fuck you.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 09:04 PM
1

Are you making long term mate with casual sex partner? If so I disagree, money means nothing to most women.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 09:03 PM
2

You didn't address the "should men get custody of their kids" point BTW.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 08:59 PM
2

How will women even know you exist if you stay in your house? Get on okcupid and find introverts who don't mind weight, its not even that hard.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 08:57 PM
1

Thanks, will look at these later.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 06:51 PM
1

Oh damn didn't see the word slut in op's q.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 06:34 PM
2

I'm not talking about personalities, I'm talking about stimuli and things that make women respond. TRP seems to think what turns women on is universal, I believe the idea on how to turn a woman on can be based in biology, but not universally with the same certain stimuli. Like dread game, not every woman is going to magically like that because biology.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 06:33 PM
2

I'm not saying it doesn't work on some women, the problem is the belief that it works on all or even the majority of women, and that the women who it doesn't work on are somehow flawed. And no, multiple people flocking to an ideology that confirms their beliefs without questioning doesn't make it right.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 06:30 PM
4

If a woman is open to casual sex, she's not going to care about anything other than a hot guy and his dick. His money and his past, unless he's a violent murderer or convicted felon, are useless info.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 06:27 PM
2

Its not irrelevant to the discussion, the discussion is about RPW, so there are obviously nonRPW but not all of them are "sluts". I was just curious.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 06:25 PM
3

Is there a middle ground for you between "slut" and "RPW" because those are the only qualities you gave.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 06:21 PM
2

Can you link me to a story like that? Not questioning you, just curious.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 06:20 PM
6

The problem with hypergamy is the red pill belief that only very specific traits will make a woman want to "upgrade", like money or celebrity status, when in reality she could not care about those things but still want to upgrade to maybe a man who travels more or is more introverted.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 06:19 PM
4

The kkk and Nazism caused outrage and they were pretty wrong on a lot of things. Not comparing the red pill to those things, just saying that things that cause outrage aren't always correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 06:17 PM
0

Are you arguing everyone is the same? Even if we have the same biological cues, we have different life experiences that make stimuli either positive or negative for us, and none of those are across the board same for everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 06:16 PM
3

I think the trope is that the bad boys can at least protect the girl, so I don't see how this goes against the whole biology thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 06:13 PM
3

That's not my point. Women under 18 who procreate have more complications than a 26 year old. That's biological, but its not to your 'benefit".
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 05:58 PM
1

Your complaint about media portrayal of dads is moot when the media portrayal of moms as bossy, nitpicky bitches is also prevelant.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 05:53 PM
2

Do you think men should be given custody of their kids? Do you find girls under the age of 18 attractive ever?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 05:22 PM
-1

Its not considered socially acceptable, and social acceptance is part of our behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 05:21 PM
4

Even if objective thought comes second, its a trait that we have and use because we see benefiting society as a whole more important than individuals. If social acceptance is an ends to objective thought, then hypocrisy would hinder your social acceptance.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 04:45 PM
-1

Its the nature of primates closely related to us and probably most animals to rape, but I hope you don't do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 04:41 PM
5

Humans have the gift of rational thought, so we can think about our impulses rationally before submitting to them. Rape is biologically beneficial for a species as a whole and a drive in most animals, even animals with higher thought processes like dolphins, but we know not to do it. Even closely related primates commit rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 04:40 PM
1

I was never being juvenile anywhere, I've meant anything I said. You had two options this whole time: 1) clarify that you were referring to both genders 2) clarify that you weren't referring to both genders It never happened. All you did was complain about context I "made up", even though you responded to my comment so of course your comment is within the context of my comment. This is pointless though, the school system failed you because you clearly don't know what context clues are, and I'm s…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 03:55 PM
1

You still havent said you were talking about both genders. Amazing.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 03:24 PM
1

Hours later, max_peenor still does not admit that he was referring to both genders, he's just mad.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 03:18 PM
3

This is all your gut reaction I assume? Also "hopefully kill themselves" Jesus Christ.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 11:52 AM
1

Which came first, the 15th amendment or the 19th?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 11:46 AM
1

I'm not saying time is discriminating against them, I'm saying there is a gap in time between being fat and not being fat that is significant to their career. and yeah that's easy for you to say if you are not poor, with kids, or were raised in a household that abused your eating habits as a kid and now you're an adult trying to beat the cycle. Are you so selfish that you think everyone has had the same convenient life experiences as you?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 11:34 AM
1

You cannot go from being fat to not being fat in a healthy way in under at least a month, which is plenty of time for you to miss out on opportunity because your employer doesn't like you because you are fat.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 11:29 AM
1

You cannot tell the difference between a fat person losing weight and a fat person. Neither can an employer. You are not psychic.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 11:26 AM
1

You're not acknowledging that fat people are legitimately discriminated against in the workplace. That's the crux of it here. I feel like I'm arguing with a brick wall, this is useless. A link was provided to you, do what you will with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 11:23 AM
-1

I'm not treating you like a hardcore red pulled, I'm asking why do red pillers get attracted to the red pill. And yes it teaches you on how to get laid, by being sexist towards women.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 11:19 AM
3

How do you phrase it? Do you tell the woman to go to the gym because her looks are unappealing to you, and the man to go because you're legitimately concerned for his health?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 11:15 AM
1

No, no, they shit on women pretty often.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 11:13 AM
2

That you are claiming TRP is for self improvement to get laid. I say it isn't just that because there are hundreds of other boards that accomplish the same thing without "women are shit" as a highly rated comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 11:12 AM
1

Lmao you don't see a fat person go to McDonald's every time you see a fat person. And no, I didn't look through your account history, you said that you agree with the hate FPH provides, what else am I supposed to think? And yeah you might not give them shit if they aren't obnoxious, but clearly employers do. This conversation isn't you-centric, its dealing with society, the link provided to you says employers discriminate against fat people for being fat, there's no variable of "even if or not i…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 11:11 AM
5

Then why was a stickied post by a mod "women are children"? Or "women are shit", by illimitableman, which was guilded? If you want to better yourself without the sexism, why not just go to a fitness board instead? Or male fashion advice? Why does that board speak to you more than any other? Because it says shit like "LMR" where you play mind reader and decide if the girl actually means yes or no for her? Because don't pretend that isn't a thing there that's prevelant. What exactly makes that "th…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 11:07 AM
1

Yeah there's only one comment in that thread that uses the word neckbeard, no shame in actual appearances or virginity. And I think its pretty funny considering mgtow users sometimes believe they are a political issue or that this will be a huge deal and women are going to suffer, so no, that post is hilarious but just making fun of them for being mgtow and nothing more.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 11:05 AM
1

They aren't inflicting workplace discrimination on themselves when work places make the choice to discriminate against them, and yeah, you hate the people on FPH. You know, the subreddit where you make public mockeries of these people because you nitpick. I'm not talking about that, I'm talking about in real life. How do you deal with the fact you cannot tell if they are trying to lose weight or not, especially in a work place?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 11:02 AM
5

Well that's all well and dandy until you move from personal development to "women don't know how to love, all women are like that."
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 10:59 AM
1

How do you deal with people who are in the long haul process of losing weight? Do you continue to discriminate against them for losing it even if theyre not making their weight loss a public event for you?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 10:54 AM
1

I didn't bitch about anything. I said a sentence. And yes, if the context I create in my statement says one thing, and you respond to it within the context I create but don't specify any differences, this is on you. This is by your own admission now that even you were addressing the context of one gender. Please stop trying to pretend you weren't addressing one gender, or at least just learn to clarify if someone says something about it instead of getting so angry.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 10:34 AM
1

Do you mean in the comments or the actual post because I don't see anything? And you didn't hurt my feelings I'm asking you to be civil.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 10:32 AM
1

Not all women require those things or see value in them, and most couples today who decide to get married just see it as a symbol of trust. Men gain the trust of knowing they have a partner who can speak for them when they are ill, be prepared for harsh life lessons, and be there for them when support is warranted. Nothing extravagant. What would a woman necessarily gain from marriage if only 15% of divorces grant alimony and she is expected to stay at home and gain no job experience to help her…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 04:33 AM
1

Welp your guess means nothing to me. And like I said, marriage is a status between people. Its traditional context means nothing. Child free is huge and for good reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 03:35 AM
1

Or they just don't have kids or the husband gives up his career!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 02:30 AM
1

If she gets a job she won't have to leech. Problem solved.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 01:37 AM
3

Why do you use the word "leech" which I can't imagine you're using that positively, and yet you believe that's where women should be?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 12:19 AM
1

Some people do. Some people get married because it is a social expectation. You get a lot more respect by being married than just being single, that's just a fact of life in most societies. Child rearing is not the number one goal of all young people now, like it or not. Honestly you should prefer this considering overpopulation is a legitimate problem. And that's a disadvantage in just taxes, but if you are making enough and are frugal enough, your income would still be a supplement. And regard…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 11:33 PM
1

Why do you think I would say that? Don't put words in my mouth. I wouldn't say that, that's still a shitty thing to say. If you're going to resort to making things up to argue with someone, you're not worth my time.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 11:24 PM
4

You can't define them, that's for sure. Those are highly subjective words. Regardless, I guess the tradition is Masculine men: Tough, rugged, physical job, possible military experience, knows wilderness, educated and stern Feminine women: Demure, coy, homemakers, beautiful, elegant, quiet, well-read, poetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 11:17 PM
2

Well that's shitty of them. I just said I haven't seen it, no need to be condescending.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 11:14 PM
1

Yeah and I say that women are flawed is a different meaning. You say they're flawed compared to an ideal partner. No, the quote is "women are flawed". Women is one group of people. It wasn't shitty women are flawed, gold digging women are flawed, sluts are flawed, it was women are flawed. That encompasses an ideal partner, and the poster did not specify otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 11:12 PM
1

Yeah considering my post asked a bit question strictly about women, and you answered not clarifying that you were speaking about both genders, this one is on you, not me.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 11:09 PM
1

Yeah I have one example, I'm not actually saying all MGTOWs are inherently misogynists, I'm saying many make comments that are. I'm not criticizing you BTW I'm just clarifying what I meant by that.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 11:08 PM
3

I didn't know so many strawmen were activists.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 11:05 PM
1

Historical and traditional marriage mean nothing when you can now get tax benefits for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 11:05 PM
2

I mean an example of one of these schools.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 11:04 PM
1

Where did I say misogyny?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 11:02 PM
8

Yeah last I checked, Reddit will bash any overweight woman and get gold for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 08:56 PM
2

Example?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 08:55 PM
3

What are you talking about
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 08:53 PM
1

Why are you assuming women want and need a family and that husbands want a family to support
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 08:43 PM
1

I mean, you know what context is right?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 08:43 PM
1

If women are flawed what are they flawed compared to?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 08:42 PM
1

Women don't think those tasks are beneath them, they think they have more to offer than just those tasks.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 07:00 PM
2

Evidence please.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 04:42 PM
2

It is literally a group that extends out from a more central idea, which is just feminism. It is by definition a fringe group. Regardless, more first world women reject than accept feminism. How do you explain that while using feminism as an example of why women are more entitled in the first world?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 04:31 PM
-1

In your analogy, Apple discusses 'themselves'. IPads or whatever apple product. In my quote, they are describing something else, women. Straight men, gay men, whatever, MGTOWS are not women. These are not analogous situations.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 04:29 PM
2

Third wave feminism is a fringe group of feminism and yet you used that as an example.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 04:25 PM
-5

I haven't seen anyone from TBP call a MGTOW ugly and not get criticized heavily for it
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 04:24 PM
2

If men are flawed as well, then maybe the original statement shouldn't have only been about women.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 04:24 PM
2

No it isn't. Men's rights wants to fight men having to pay child support. I said that they want nothing to do with their kids. These two statements are logically consistent unless you believe men shouldn't have to pay child support but also should be allowed to visit the kids and help "raise" them after leaving them, which would make men seem even more entitled than the original sentiment.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 04:21 PM
2

Women are flawed is not the same statement as woman have flaws. And acknowledging women are flawed as a coping mechanism because they hurt your feelings is not an excuse when men are capable of also being jerks, and yet your phrase only is directed towards women.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 04:16 PM
2

People are not two different products, they are part of the same species. And there is a huge contextual difference between saying "women have flaws" and "women are flawed". One is saying that they are not perfect, which is fine. One is comparative, saying that they are messed up compared to what we can only assume is men.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 04:13 PM
3

Not all women are feminists, not all feminists are third wave, and the men's rights movement that wants to rid men of the responsibility of having to deal with children they produced can be argued as entitled.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 04:02 PM
4

Nope.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 04:00 PM
1

Then why not say "people" are flawed? Stop using gender neutral terms in a statement that wasn't gender neutral.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 03:57 PM
3

Lol "human beings" is a gender neutral term.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 03:56 PM
3

I'm not going to argue with someone who believes whatever confirms their preconceived notions without any evidence is true.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 03:44 PM
3

No it isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 03:44 PM
2

No but you responded to my comment without clarifying, and my comment didn't deal with both genders.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 03:43 PM
9

Lol yes it does.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 02:44 PM
5

That's not exclusive to one gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 02:44 PM
3

Being picky about who you have sex with doesn't necessarily correlate to having high expectations for the partner. Do you have any source that specifically deals with women's expectations?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 01:19 PM
2

Nobody is gender neutral, women is not.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 01:18 PM
2

Marriage stats don't suggest to the reader how many relationships exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 12:46 PM
2

How are women expecting more and offering "less"?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 12:45 PM
0

I just want them to actually be away and never hear about them again. But then they post shit like: http://www.np.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/30otku/z/cpv8iya And I can't help but think that they don't hate the system, they just hate women. Come on, flawed creatures? That's Elliot Rodger material.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 12:37 PM
11

That song is stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 12:35 PM
4

Its their favorite strawman.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/15 06:42 PM
1

This is pointless. You are arguing semantics, not feelings, and dismissing it. Unless you're absolutely bullheaded, the meaning of those two definitions is the same effect.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/15 04:10 PM
2

Slut shaming doesn't just encompass who your partners are and how many, it encompasses what you do with them, and a looot of people see kinky stuff as "slutty" or unladylike.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 09:07 PM
1

Can you show me an example where 2XC calls the man the rapist if both are drunk?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 09:04 PM
-1

Where am I not calm? Please don't read even more that doesn't exist like emotions you are making up. And no it didn't sound suspiciously like anything, you wanted to believe it did. Edit: I suspect you're downvoting me. That's pretty obvious actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 08:47 PM
1

So how do these people respond when a large majority of rapes are by trusted individuals?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 08:43 PM
2

Do you not understand the context of this discussion, tangent or not? Aw fuck it I give up.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 08:42 PM
-2

Yes where did I say they didn't? Why are you reading things that don't exist? Still, most of the blame goes to the rapist, he made the decision to have the action happen. Are you defending the actions of rapists as if they literally can't control themselves around a tipsy girl or a girl in a dark alley?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 08:39 PM
2

Why is it funny to ask about why you would ask a question in a thread with the context of comparing women to literal dumpsters?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 08:34 PM
-1

Yeah you shouldn't blame the victim predominately for the actions of someone who intentionally does something and has the choice not to.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 08:33 PM
0

They would have been raped, if those people are logically consistent. My question is, where are those people? Most people just question having sex with someone blackout and falling down drunk.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 08:24 PM
1

And the definition is word for word interchangeable with what the user said. They mean the same thing. They are synonyms.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 08:20 PM
-1

And he could have chosen not to rob anything. Where did I say anything to the contrary of what you're saying to begin with? Why are you arguing about taking precautions with me when I never said anything against it?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 08:19 PM
-1

Apparently its not obvious to the other user responding to me, so I guess it needed pointing out to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 08:11 PM
1

I dont believe anything, interchanging the words would have the exact same effect.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 08:11 PM
0

The thief is still the responsible party in the burglary even happening, he chose to be a thief, the unlocked door being a temptation does not excuse his behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 08:08 PM
2

A person running a red light doesnt have an intention of hitting someone, a person raping someone had the intent in the first place. One is an accident, one is not, these are not analagous.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 08:00 PM
2

What im wondering is why are you talking about a literal dumpster in the first place
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 07:59 PM
1

Even though the words are interchangeable? Thats splitting hairs and being picky about literally nothing but word choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 07:58 PM
2

You understand discussions within a discussion have context right? I highly HIGHLY doubt you're just blindly asking why dumpsters are bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 06:55 PM
1

I mean you need to explain how what they said is different from your definition. Thats not feels, the two definitions seem comparable, if not identical.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 06:54 PM
1

That's a genuine definition of prejudice though, which again boils down to conflict of definitions and not feels. I have seen a definition that resembles that, and thats how its been described to me. Edit: also how does their definition conflict with the Oxford one exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 06:30 PM
1

And you said you had a negative bias against women based on stereotypes. You used stereotypes, why can't they? And why is it fair for you to generalize BPers but BPers not make general statements about TRP sub? And how do you know those are based on feels and not observation?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 05:55 PM
2

Your comment is vaguely implying why does a woman even get offended by being called a dumpster though because you see no negative in it.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 05:47 PM
0

http://www.np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/2wjw02/z/corm12g How was this not a good comment chain of debate and just "feels"? Where are the feels?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 05:46 PM
-1

Nah I see quite a few examples of definitions from different sources that you are refusing to acknowledge here.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 05:38 PM
2

Do you even know what this thread is about then
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 05:37 PM
2

Its definitely stupid but she didnt rape herself. The responsibulity of the actual rape still falls on the person actively deciding to rape, in any case, no matter what the conditions.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 05:10 PM
3

Wow you really go against the RP strawmen. Go you, I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 05:03 PM
3

I dont see as many feelings there as much as conflict of definitions.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 04:43 PM
3

Does TRP affect how you treat women outside of sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 03:18 PM
4

I see a lot of really good discussion there from TBP. Are you only saying this because they didn't immediately agree with you?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 03:12 PM
1

He didn't imply that.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 11:29 AM
0

Yes you're literally talking about dumpsters. So why are women dumpsters and not people? There are other words for objectified women like slut and whore that still remain "human".
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 11:27 AM
2

I just asked for evidence, no need to insult me. Also do you have an actual academic paper, and not the Daily Mail?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 05:21 AM
1

Do you have proof of this?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 05:18 AM
2

How is it a fact exactly? If all men are seeking to have sex with hotter women, and then usually end up bragging about it, they also see them as status objects.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 05:07 AM
1

Do you honestly believe women don't care about how good looking men are?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 05:00 AM
1

When's the last time you saw a literal dumpster do anything with rational thought behind it after some guy whacks off into it?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 04:10 AM
2

Cum dumpster. Cum rag. Whore, bitch, slut. Fake. Ditzy. Those are all words I hear describing women more, and they are just as bad, if not worse. No one is defending the terms you brought to the table by the way, so why are you distracting the actual conversation with words that hurt your feelings?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 04:07 AM
5

Are dumpsters people? If not, then why dehumanize a woman and call her one? Why not just call her a person? Hell, why not do her the lesser of two evils and call her a whore or slut, because both of those at least mean you believe she's still a sentient being?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 04:02 AM
1

Are men?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 03:59 AM
1

I'm just giving an example. And just wondering why you think your idea of happiness is enough to lead you to lecture other people about.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/15 03:06 AM
3

Are you telling them that the lifestyle that they live is going to harm them while their male counterparts are left without criticism? And why do you think you are more worthy to listen to than, say, a professor?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/15 02:34 AM
2

Boobs have really nothing more to do with fertility and health than hair or skin or hips though, and they don't produce babies on their own. And if foot fetishes aren't analogous, then you probably shouldn't use the idea of how it gets someone of sexually as evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/15 05:50 PM
1

To be fair many people get turned on playing with feet and having their feet played with, but we don't consider feet sexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/15 05:40 PM
1

can you show an instance where he was trolling, and not just disagreeing?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/15 01:16 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter