TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

youremomgay420 Archive

View 0 posts and 43 comments by youremomgay420 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Anarchists would burn everything down to rebuild it the way they think it should be Nazis would genocide millions, even billions to achieve the Aryan race Both are bad. Objectively. But being blown up by a grenade is objectively worse than being stabbed by a butter knife. Both hurt. One is much, much, much worse.
/r/MensRights07/03/25 03:25 AM
2

Ehhh, while both sides do have radicals, you need to realize that extremism is a spectrum. A right extremist and left extremist both want very different things, and are comfortable with very different things to achieve it You wouldn’t say an anarchist and a Nazi should be lumped together, would you?
/r/MensRights07/03/25 03:19 AM
2

Extremists are gonna be extremists, they don’t listen to reason and they don’t care about honest conversation. They simply care about their echo chamber and circlejerking their opinions with people who think the same way. It’s not on you, honestly, it can be kinda fun rage baiting people like this, since they’re too set in their ways to realize that people can say absurd shit solely to disagree with them, without actually believing the absurd shit you’re saying. But in the future, don’t be surpr…
/r/MensRights07/03/25 03:15 AM
2

Man posts on a subreddit full of extremist anti-men women and gets insulted and berated by them, then proceeds to be shocked. What did you expect? Not saying I disagree with what you said, there are people like that on both sides. But you can’t go to a subreddit like “r/wehatemen” and then pretend like they’re gonna have a reasonable discussion lol
/r/MensRights07/03/25 03:11 AM
-8

For real, are some MAGAts raising this sub and trying to make Trump seem like a hero or something?
/r/MensRights24/02/25 12:42 AM
-26

Because a redditor said so
/r/MensRights03/06/24 01:14 AM
-31

Rage bait
/r/MensRights03/06/24 01:14 AM
-28

Rage bait
/r/MensRights03/06/24 01:14 AM
1

You literally do not comprehend what I’m saying. I’m done trying to beat it into your thick skull. Bashing “wokeism” is equivalent to bashing leftism to right-wing media. Just because you think it doesn’t, doesn’t mean it doesn’t. You support right-wing extremism by bashing “wokeism”. If you disliked extremists, then just bash extremists. Woke has been coined by right-wing media as leftism, whether you agree or disagree, that’s a fact.
/r/MensRights08/04/24 02:45 AM
1

You don’t comprehend what I’m saying, clearly. Woke does NOT refer to JUST extremism. That is my entire point. Right-wing media uses it for ALL of leftism. Just because YOU think it means just extremism, doesn’t mean the media thinks otherwise. It’s used to cover leftism as a WHOLE, so when you bash “woke” shit, to them, you are bashing leftism, which is what they want. Hopefully that forces it through your skull.
/r/MensRights08/04/24 02:27 AM
1

My brother in Christ, you are too far gone. Nobody supports the extremists. Right-wing media uses woke as a blanket term for leftism. If you hate extremists, just say you hate extremists. Bashing “wokeism” just means you’re bashing leftism, in the eyes of right-wing media. You’re letting the right extremists win by falling for their propaganda. There’s no point in arguing with someone that’s this drunk off the kool-aid. The fact that you can scream and shout that wokeism is a thing simply becaus…
/r/MensRights08/04/24 02:10 AM
1

It is objectively anti-left-wing, which stands for LGBT rights, equality, basically general human rights and such. Woke is a blanket term used for leftist ideology, which is inherently the fight for humans rights across the board. You can pretend that ISN’T what it’s used for, but you’d be living a lie. There’s a reason right-wing media uses it so much, because they’re trying to get you to rally against the left-wing, by painting them as “woke”, which just means the left-wing supports humans rig…
/r/MensRights08/04/24 12:17 AM
1

There is no such thing as “woke people”, the people you mention are left extremists who the left disagrees with. What you need to comprehend is that just because YOU consider a word or term to mean something, doesn’t mean that is what it means in the grand scheme of things. Right-wing media uses “woke” to refer to leftist ideals as a WHOLE. When you say you dislike “woke people”, 99.9% of right-wing media reads that as you dislike leftists. You can argue with that all you like, that is a genuine…
/r/MensRights08/04/24 12:14 AM
0

Right wing hate men enough to radicalize them against humans rights movements just so they have people fighting for them on social media. Left wing realizes that men have been horrible oppressors in the past, and want to take strides in a direction where humans can be truly equal, not forced to submit to any other human. The latter is considered “woke” and must be abolished, apparently.
/r/MensRights08/04/24 12:09 AM
1

The issue of the matter is this: no normal, sane people fighting for these causes refer to it as “woke” or “wokeism”. They simply refer to it as what it is: the fight for equal rights and social justice. Those who use it, use it primarily because of right-wing media, who has used the term to talk about these issues in a negative light. The term is inherently negative because it has been coined by media that exclusively uses it in a negative way, so referring to these issues as “woke” is referrin…
/r/MensRights08/04/24 12:05 AM
1

Woke indeed covers all of that, those “social injustices”, solely because right-wing media wouldn’t shut up about it all because they’re “woke.” Anyone who actually bitches and complains about this fake “wokeism”: A) consumes too much right-wing media, and B) disagrees with these “social injustices” fully (ie transphobic people, sexists, racists, etc). Complaining about “wokeism” literally means you’re part of the problem, as you’re falling for the conspiracy.
/r/MensRights07/04/24 05:10 AM
1

Dog, woke is thrown around in right-wing media so often that it covers basically any kind of left-wing movement. Whether you like it or not, woke is anti-LGBT, anti-black and basically anti-left-wing in general.
/r/MensRights07/04/24 03:26 AM
-2

It absolutely isn’t a thing. It’s literally propaganda created by right-wing media to rally everyone against the left-wing by claiming anything the left-wing supports is “woke.” Woke was a term used by black folk to kinda just be in the know about people who discriminated against them
/r/MensRights07/04/24 03:15 AM
-2

The word actually does have a real set meaning, it was used by the black community to “stay woke” to racial discrimination. And “leftist extremism” ≠ what right-wingers refer to as “woke”. They call basically anything LGBT related as woke, even occasionally racially related. “Woke” has nothing to do with the article, there’s no reason it’s in this title.
/r/MensRights07/04/24 03:13 AM
-10

“Wokeism” isn’t a thing. Right-wing media created “wokeism” to turn people against things like LGBT or even just racial inequalities. You’re upset over a conspiracy that doesn’t exist, because right-wing media told you it exists.
/r/MensRights07/04/24 02:40 AM
-12

It’s seeming like it’s rapidly becoming right-wing, unfortunately. Seeming to become less of a “Men’s Rights” sub and more of an “anti-everything else” sub.
/r/MensRights07/04/24 01:58 AM
-9

Why is “woke” in the title? That’s kind of attempting to pull the point away from the actual point. Downvote me all you want. The term “woke” has no place in this title, and it’s being used solely to drag attention away from the false sexual abuse accusation. This is an anti-“woke” post disguising itself as a r/MensRights post. Don’t buy into it.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 11:09 PM
4

Actually 16 is technically age of consent for all sexual activity, but that age is too low imo. 18 should be the minimum.
/r/MensRights17/03/24 07:49 AM
21

Depends on the state/province, + 16 usually only counts as age of consent when the other party is only a couple years older, not 9-10 years older
/r/MensRights17/03/24 07:45 AM
2

Of course people are going to exaggerate, does that change the fact that Trump was extremely dangerous to America while he was in office? No. It takes 5 minutes of research to realize Trump was doing nothing but terrible shit for America.
/r/MensRights14/03/24 12:47 AM
2

Normal people: “Trump supporters are dangerous people” You: “L” Hold the L while your country falls to rubble because you believe in someone who leaked confidential documents to other countries
/r/MensRights13/03/24 08:53 PM
4

You know which is which, one side thinks people that aren’t white, straight and Christian deserve genocide, the other are obsessed with people who don’t use their proper pronouns. Don’t be disingenuous, or stupid.
/r/MensRights13/03/24 08:51 PM
-9

One that far too many people who think “both sides suck” refuse to talk about. One sides extremists are actually dangerous people, the other sides extremists are chronically online.
/r/MensRights13/03/24 06:24 AM
8

He literally leaked confidential government records to foreign countries, most notably to Russia. You’re a fucking lunatic if you think Trump is “cool” simply because he’s “not a simp.” You don’t elect someone who’ll destroy the country into office simply because the other option is a “simp”, which doesn’t even make sense.
/r/MensRights10/03/24 11:51 PM
5

It takes 5 minutes of Trump research to realize he’s a lunatic that should not be in office.
/r/MensRights10/03/24 11:31 PM
-4

YIKES.
/r/MensRights10/03/24 10:20 PM
-1

Good for you. Who are you say what OTHERS think? Your comment that I replied to spoke about all people against abortion as a whole, when that is very clearly not the case. If you think abortions should’ve only been illegal if unnecessary then you should’ve spoke up. Because 99% of other anti-abortion republicans think a mother should have to die if it means the baby lives, even if the baby would die just minutes after it’s birth. Anti-abortion people think an unborn baby is more important than a…
/r/AntiFeminists27/11/22 09:06 PM
1

This is absolutely not the case. Are you all living under a rock? People argued “what if they’re raped, what if it’s a medical crisis, etc” and all you republican hicks all made up the same excuses. “It’s not the baby fault” “so why are you punishing the unborn baby?” etc etc. You hicks think ALL abortions should be illegal, if you didn’t, then you would’ve opposed making ALL abortions illegal. Idiots
/r/AntiFeminists27/11/22 08:54 PM
1

This isn’t r/pussypassdenied, she’s not really asking for special treatment and she’s not getting shut down. This also seems like more of a joke than anything. “I don’t wanna train it” isn’t equal to “I don’t want it to be ugly.”
/r/PussyPassDenied10/05/20 05:52 AM
165

“Accidentally have sex with them” “I accidentally took off all my clothes and accidentally started kissing him, then I accidentally had sex with him for hours and am now regretting it.” There’s no excuse for cheating, people who make up excuses for it are gross
/r/MensRights17/04/20 03:37 PM
1

Meant to be a joke but I guess I’m the only one that found it funny. Whoops
/r/MensRights28/01/20 09:18 PM
120

Remember guys, if you keep your legs spread a bit while you’re sitting so you don’t crush your junk, you’re assaulting women
/r/MensRights27/11/19 11:13 PM
7

Not full-out sex, no. Having sex in HS doesn’t make you “cool.” It makes you dumb.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/11/19 05:29 PM
2

I’m talking about High-Schoolers in general. There are those who have common sense (you, for example), and then there are those who don’t (them).
/r/PussyPassDenied16/11/19 03:43 AM
-10

You shouldn’t. There’s no reason for anyone in high school to be having sex. It’s really not that cool of an activity. You’re all too young to be doing that shit.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/11/19 03:40 AM
0

Then it’s straight up kiddy porn. They recorded porn of kids under the age of consent. Kiddy porn= illegal and bad.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/11/19 03:39 AM
-18

If she/they are under 16, then the idiots recorded kiddy porn. Best to inform someone of authority about it. Edit: forgot guys can be below age to consent because I’m dumb.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/11/19 03:35 AM
15

How old is she?
/r/PussyPassDenied16/11/19 03:30 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter