TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

yourfaceyourass Archive

View 2 posts and 349 comments by yourfaceyourass on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

This is kind of the last thing Id expect to read in MR.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 09:17 AM
7

What the fuck does atheism have to do with feminism?
/r/MensRights30/12/12 09:12 AM
11

This runs off of a complete straw man. Let's just say, "hypothetically" you are an enemy of the United States (or any free and successful country). You are a communist psy-ops specialist in the Soviet Union. Or heck, just a communist ideologue from the Frasier School that wants to ruin the US. Whatever your origins, you are a communist that wants to destroy the US. You envy its economic wealth, you envy it's economic production, you hate how it's dominant and #1, and it really grinds your gears …
/r/MensRights03/11/12 09:51 PM
1

He's partly right, but anti-discrimination laws would prohibit men from hiring men over women solely because they are men, no?
/r/MensRights03/11/12 02:37 AM
3

Some of the studies on the list addressed this. http://www.fact.on.ca/Info/dom/george94.htm Another which examines the effects of abuse on men. http://fact.on.ca/Info/dom/hines01.htm
/r/MensRights02/11/12 08:05 PM
3

Did you get this from my post? I posted it here. The discussion that follows if anyone is interested http://www.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/12govi/hawaii_morning_tv_anchor_takes_a_stand_against/c6v1c95?context=3 Someone posted a criticism of the list, if anyone wants to read it. I haven't taken the time to respond yet.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 08:02 PM
0

Source? From what I read, there isn't any significant differences in intelligence ability of men and women. I think its much more sensible to say the reason why men have invented and built everything is because they always been in a much better position to do so.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 03:11 AM
1

This is a complete misunderstanding of socialism. And capitalism has killed equal amounts if you're willing to quantify if that way.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 03:01 AM
0

Its not the title. Look at the comments. They're all basically saying "This guy isn't man enough to be a man". He is a loser, omega, doesn't deserve to have a dick, and etc. Completely meaningless. Someone looking at this thread would seem right to think that MRAs are just chauvinistic assholes.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 07:03 PM
3

They're not totalitarians. The complete opposite, actually. Most define themselves as anarchists.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 06:43 PM
5

Straw man...
/r/MensRights30/10/12 06:43 PM
11

Communism is a very widely defined term. However, those who proclaim themselves as communists advocate a stateless, and classless society in which the means of production was owned by the workers. It is more or less so analogous with anarchism, and is strictly anti-state. The USSR, North Korea, Cuba, China, and etc are "communist" in name only. The vast majority of communists, including those on /r/communism, do not defend or advocate the actions of these authoritarian states. You won't have to …
/r/MensRights30/10/12 06:22 PM
4

Straw man.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 06:14 PM
1

Because this kind of thing makes this subreddit look like its full of kids.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 06:12 PM
0

I am not a feminist. I post here.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 02:24 PM
-7

Ahh, another great circlejerk with absolutely no discussion. Stop with this shit. Does this subreddit have nothing better to do then make fun of a guy they disagree with?
/r/MensRights30/10/12 06:14 AM
1

Yes, but using this as evidence is entirely laughable.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 03:06 PM
2

Ah, bad formatting.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 06:57 AM
2

It was by highest bid...You literally had to be a millionaire to bid.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 06:57 AM
0

The guy flashed his dick for attention, apparently.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 03:42 AM
1

You forgot girlwriteswhat.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 03:28 AM
-12

This is dumb. There aren't even many very female millionaires.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 03:27 AM
5

Thanks
/r/MensRights28/10/12 09:29 PM
2

I posted this just recently Feminists use it as an all encompassing term for every problem existent in society, as if all of it stems directly from this thing we call "the patriarchy". Patriarchy is merely a concept, properly defined as and referring to a social system in which the males are the primary authority within society and are the head of the household, holding authority over women. This is problematic however, because even if such a description is accurate, it does not constitute a "sy…
/r/MensRights28/10/12 09:25 PM
1

Exactly. The problem is almost entirely economic and political. How are such problems going to be solved without a stable government, employment, education, and etc? The Middle East has already shown that it is capable of furthering democracy. The socialist republic of Afghanistan in the 80s for example pushed huge reforms for women's rights and literacy. 40% of students at Kabul university were women as were 60% of the teachers. Religious fundamentalism and the Taliban does not make up the coun…
/r/MensRights28/10/12 05:05 PM
1

I don't think hes explicitly stated that he would introduce quotas. I think that was merely speculation. Never found a solid source on that.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 11:34 PM
-1

Oh no, fuck this guy. He manages to be annoying piece of shit even on topics I agree on.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 03:00 AM
3

I recommend watching her. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqEeCCuFFO8
/r/MensRights21/10/12 01:47 AM
7

This is silly. What the fuck were they exactly suppose to do?
/r/MensRights19/10/12 05:09 AM
1

Marxism-Feminism exists, so what?
/r/MensRights18/10/12 10:57 PM
4

You're being fucking stupid. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism Socialism is a very wide term that encompasses many schools of thoughts on the basis of economic democracy. While most socialists do promote gender equality (as they should), there is no direct relation with feminist theory and socialist thought. Nor does some feminists being socialists undermine socialism. Its like saying because feminists started taking physics theories and misapplying them, then physics is feminist.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 10:06 PM
4

I dont care if feminists associate themselves with Marxism (although I seen no such relation in the movement). Thy are entirely different idealogies. Socialism.has.many schools of thoughts.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 09:05 PM
0

But the studies on males still comes from the same feminists and feminist theory.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 07:49 PM
3

Socialism has nothing to do with gender studies.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 07:45 PM
1

The problems are still almost.entirely conomic.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 06:43 AM
-5

I don't think he said women should be expected to do house work. I think he was talking about making work flexible so that women are able to find work that is suitable to their lifestyle.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 02:36 AM
0

They never seemed to have mentioned anything about countering the "sexist bent". Merely about adding information about female scientists, which may be lacking on Wikipedia. Whats wrong with that exactly?
/r/MensRights17/10/12 11:52 PM
1

Its not just women. Politicians have to pander to the lowest common denominator. This ensures that they can never say anything that is potentially alienating or controversial to voters.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 08:17 PM
5

Yet according to my gender class my grandma was oppressed bc she was just a nurse while my grandfather had a difficult career I would have gotten really angry.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 08:14 PM
1

Because they don't understand economic forces and think "the patriarchy" is a system of its own.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 08:13 PM
5

Show your husband a video of the procedure. I don't think anyone would really want to have it done on a newborn after seeing it.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 09:29 PM
10

Men shame each other of their masculinity because society prefers masculinity over femininity bro! Its just the patriarchy. Here is some of that bullshit. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JMqNlT1PqdY
/r/MensRights14/10/12 11:12 PM
0

So if I grope you just once, its cool?
/r/MensRights14/10/12 05:25 PM
28

Holy fuck. There is a difference between compliments and sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 05:08 PM
41

Cat calling isn't the same thing as being told you have a nice suit...
/r/MensRights14/10/12 04:47 PM
0

I think the point is to get them to be interested in it. Thats not at all a bad goal really. Getting more women interested in the sciences is pretty crucial for gender equality. However, discriminating against men to do so isn't the solution.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 04:45 PM
17

I think you will take a liking to her videos. http://www.youtube.com/user/girlwriteswhat/videos?sort=p&flow=grid&view=0 Check it out.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 04:53 AM
2

Support cancer research, not cancer. I was joking about your use of words.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 04:50 AM
3

This is pretty dumb.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 04:38 AM
1

I don't think we should be supporting cancer at all...
/r/MensRights13/10/12 11:39 PM
2

Watch girlwriteswhat's videos. The draft is a good one. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHvcFzzUues&feature=plcp
/r/MensRights13/10/12 11:26 PM
4

"for a young man it’s much more fun to prance around with a gun, or to kill several enemies with a bomb, than it is to sit at a desk day after day, bored by a dead-end job”" Holy fuck, that is terrible. Send her some veteran stories. WW2 documentaries should do it.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 10:50 PM
1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Origin_of_the_Family,_Private_Property_and_the_State http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1884/origin-family/index.htm Might be of interest to you
/r/MensRights12/10/12 05:31 AM
3

Yes thats still harassment.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 11:47 PM
-1

Never seen it happen in my life honestly.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 11:46 PM
1

This doesn't mean she wasn't raped. But nonetheless, I don't think there is enough evidence to convict him.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 01:16 AM
2

It means that not enough men showed interest in the event. It never said why they didn't. But merely that they tried but did not get enough responses. How hard is that to understand?
/r/MensRights30/09/12 06:11 AM
0

It didn't say anything about men being lazy. It said they tried but there was insufficient interest. What the fuck.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 05:12 AM
-5

Is this seriously the top issue right now?
/r/MensRights30/09/12 05:08 AM
19

Administration is very keen on what could be called harassment. Spreafing rumors about being a neo-nazi could be taken seriously.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 03:45 PM
-2

Thats because men have a huge advantage over women in sports. If a woman can out compete men, she should be allowed to play with men. In professional sports however this is just near impossible and not even worth discussing. Im sorry but suggesting men should be able to play on womens teams is fucking retarded. The whole point of having a separate womens team is to allow women to compete with people of their own capability. There is no need to stretch this trivial event and pose it as an issue.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 08:25 PM
-5

Adults are not allowed to play in child games simply because they're bigger and stronger? Whaaaaaaaa?
/r/MensRights28/09/12 06:58 PM
1

But theres over 200 studies documenting over 400,000 cases which do in fact show that. They will most likely go on a fallback position, but I cant imagine someone would dismiss it entirely.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 12:47 AM
2

Why not just mention that Domestic violence is in fact shared equally between men and women?
/r/MensRights27/09/12 11:50 PM
65

Fuck off with the victimhood complex. If a drunk guy/girl approaches me in the middle of the night I'd be scared too. You make it out to seem like she was walking through the mall and being scared of every man that passes her.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 05:41 AM
22

No hes not and no it wasn't. Orwell was a socialist who took a bullet to the neck fighting for anarchism in Spain within the anti-Stalinist POUM militia, very much witnessing the creation of socialism during the Civil War. Orwell's political views are very obvious once you read Homage to Catalonia, which is a personal account of his time in Spain. He was a Trotyskist and hated Stalin. The book was nothing more than a reference to the debacle of Trotsky and Stalin. Once you understand the histori…
/r/MensRights22/09/12 06:14 PM
15

Communism is a form of socialism. All communists are socialists, but not all socialists are communists.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 06:11 PM
9

Troll.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 11:15 PM
-1

Please stop this. Feminists would be the primary group of women to be against that kind of shit.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 05:55 AM
3

What? Just reread that. I said its scientific both times. Whats unscientific is the trivial situation you put it in. I.e, how people complain.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 01:16 AM
4

"Human females" sounds weird because you're using scientific language in a completely unscientific and trivial situation. Its like saying "When Homo erectus complain..." Female has absolutely no negative connotation. You're pretending one.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 01:01 AM
37

This is completely over simplified false dichotomy. And why did someone with absolutely no post history and a new account make this?
/r/MensRights02/09/12 12:03 AM
14

Ding ding, humans are animals. Female and male are more scientific terms used to universally discuss sex in all species. Women and men is more specific to human beings. More specifically its for adult humans. Hence saying women would technically be wrong if you're also talking about girls.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 12:01 AM
2

Thanks.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 11:49 PM
17

Please, don't throw ad hominems and make stupid generalizations.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 11:47 PM
3

Thats a misquote This actually comes from the novel Children of the Arbat (1987) by Anatoly Rybakov. In his later book The Novel of Memories (In Russian) Rybakov admitted that he had no sources for such a statement.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 07:40 PM
5

Only milder forms of FGM are less physically harmful then MGM. Both are atrocious however.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 04:35 AM
5

Sex is something that a man does to a women, right? If two people have sex while drunk, it has to be the man's fault. I don't get it. You can't have drunk sex, ever?
/r/MensRights24/08/12 07:37 PM
8

A skinhead with a swastika tattooed?
/r/MensRights24/08/12 04:52 AM
14

I get the message, but nonetheless someone's looks can often tell very much about the individual.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 04:27 AM
8

Only milder forms of FGM are better then MGM, but that doesn't mean either is right.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 01:33 AM
20

That's stupid. The disgust comes from homophobes who think being gay is disgusting and would probably cringe at the idea of two gay man having sex in the first place. Hardly has anything to do with being hit on. Homophobes are also likely to be closet homosexuals, which means that homophobia is much more complex than simply not liking unwanted attraction. Guys receiving unwanted attraction is an entirely different subject, And I don't understand the conclusion. Don't hit on girls because they mi…
/r/MensRights24/08/12 12:47 AM
5

You can't just fight social attitudes directly. It is far more effective to combat laws and institutional discrimination.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 08:53 PM
2

Well most prisoners tend to be male, so it does make sense to mention that there are females. But seeing that the number is as low as 2, it seems more like it was written to invoke empathy.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 08:46 PM
6

Not a single medical association recommends routine circumscion. http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/moral-landscapes/201109/myths-about-circumcision-you-likely-believe
/r/MensRights23/08/12 08:38 PM
1

I am pretty sure I seen the opposite actually. Its just making fun of changes in culture. Its not such a big deal.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 08:27 PM
3

The dichotomy of the left and right arose from the French Revolution in which those who opposed the revolution sat on the right in the Estate General, and those who supported it sat on the left. Hence its roots really are revolutionary. While, yes, leftists generally are very advocating of social change, classical leftism usually entails a revolutionary change in order to achieve such social change and "create a more egalitarian society". Mainstream feminism from the left is often criticized as …
/r/MensRights22/08/12 08:23 PM
1

Lets not stalk the girl...
/r/MensRights22/08/12 08:14 PM
7

The classical definition of leftism is any ideology that advocates the social ownership over the means of production and is hence opposed to both political and economic hierarchy. That is, capitalism and usually the State. If by leftist, you mean the skewed dichotomy of right and left wing in American culture, then yes, leftist means nothing more than that you support abortion and gay rights. From what I seen mainstream feminism generally entirely ignores politics, economics, and science in favo…
/r/MensRights22/08/12 07:58 PM
5

They should stop calling themselves that. Leftism puts class before gender, and views gender roles as a result of economics rather as some. Post modernism is probably the antithesis of materialism and Marxism.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 07:52 PM
11

Oh yeah. Kind of impressive that women can earn more degrees then men in a warzone. Something tells me that it was much preferable to be a women and stay at home rather then go fight in Vietnam.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 07:43 PM
5

Leftism has nothing to do with post modernism. Marx was a staunch anti-idealist. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Materialism In philosophy, the theory of materialism holds that the only thing that exists is matter or energy; that all things are composed of material and all phenomena (including consciousness) are the result of material interactions. In other words, matter is the only substance, and reality is identical with the actually occurring states of energy and matter.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 07:37 PM
8

Circumscion complications also cost a lot of money, and in some rare cases, kill babies. Also, considering that in Europe where the uncircumcised rate is much higher, and the HIV rate is yet much lower, I think there is a huge gap to be accounted for.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 07:10 AM
3

Im guessing she thinks circumcision is just a little snip?
/r/MensRights22/08/12 07:08 AM
2

What the fuck is wrong with sexualizing women? And what is "healthy sexuality" exactly? Women being paid to be sexy without any religious motivated speech and worry about sexuality being wrong is...oppressive? Its rather ironic. Lets protect women from being seen sexually and cover them in burkas! Women's fertility should be protected!
/r/MensRights22/08/12 05:13 AM
1

Hollywood doesn't push agendas. Its merely a representation of prevalent contemporary real life attitudes.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 05:12 AM
1

Someone doesn't agree with me, it must be because Im a woman!
/r/MensRights22/08/12 03:21 AM
1

I don't see why its any different from calling someone a dick. Its all about intention. And I have never really seen the word cunt used as a derogatory word for women. In fact, I seen it used more on males.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 08:00 AM
7

Traditionally, anarchism has more correctly been seen as an opposition to all political and economic hierarchy, and hence is opposed both to the state and to private property. Anarcho capitalism uses more of a dictionary definition of anarchism.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 01:43 AM
6

Thats not true. Socialism is an umbrella term encompassing any ideology that advocates for the social ownership over the means of production. Socialism hence can refer to both. State socialism can also often seen by leftist libertarians to be a necessary transitioning stage from capitalism to communism. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism
/r/MensRights21/08/12 01:39 AM
4

Anarchists are technically socialists.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 01:28 AM
-2

This is a bad criticism. Opposing oppressive hierarchy doesn't mean you can't use your authority to ban people from an internet discussion.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 01:27 AM
4

Anarchism as a classically left movement promotes the social ownership over the means of production, as opposed to private property as advocated by anarcho capitalism. Anarchism isn't about anarchy, but the abolishment of the State, which is seen as an illegitimate form of authority and hierarchy. It proposes instead that society be organized and governed by non-hierarchal and voluntary association. Chomsky is a well known anarchist and intellectual. He has some good talks here http://www.youtub…
/r/MensRights21/08/12 01:19 AM
2

If you were a civilian your chances of living were still much higher than being in the military. Consider instead the percentage of men that died within a population versus that of women. But I don't see why this is even worthy of consideration though.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 08:27 PM
2

You think men are only virgins because they choose so?
/r/MensRights20/08/12 08:51 AM
1

Guy is an idiot and has no understanding of Marxism or critical theory. And feminism has no relation to either of these.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 08:43 AM
4

First of all, this group is for men. What the fuck?
/r/MensRights20/08/12 08:43 AM
2

Condoms is probably a good idea. Three studies in Africa several years ago that claimed that circumcision prevented AIDS and that circumcision was as effective as a 60% effective vaccine (Auvert 2005, 2006). These studies had many flaws, including that they were stopped before all the results came in. There have also been several studies that show that circumcision does not prevent HIV (Connolly 2008). There are many issues at play in the spread of STDs which make it very hard to generalize resu…
/r/MensRights20/08/12 06:28 AM
3

I believe the purpose of the circumcisions is supposedly has to do with the belief that circumcision significantly reduces HIV contraction.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 05:21 AM
3

Can someone explain how welfare programs contribute to destroying families?
/r/MensRights20/08/12 12:59 AM
4

Do you believe that historically woman have had a lower standing then men in western society? Do you believe that woman have a lower standing then men in many parts of the world? I think Girlwriteswhat tackles this question very nicely http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vp8tToFv-bA I think her videos are a great starting point to the MRM. While certainly men have had the more dominant positions, the average male did not have it much better than the average women. Would you rather stay home and take …
/r/MensRights19/08/12 09:46 PM
6

http://www.dailyfinance.com/2010/01/30/a-hidden-crime-domestic-violence-against-men-is-a-growing-probl/ And yet, more than 200 survey-based studies show that domestic violence is just as likely to strike men as women. In fact, the overwhelming mass of evidence indicates that half of all domestic violence cases involve an exchange of blows and the remaining 50% is evenly split between men and women who are brutalized by their partners. Part of the reason that this problem is widely ignored lies i…
/r/MensRights19/08/12 09:44 PM
9

The second half of the article is just a complete victim mentality, and ignores any rational understanding of human behavior. It also somewhat dodges the premise of the argument, and instead says that women shouldn't sleep around with men, but men are allowed to do so. Why is it fair that women who have a lot of sex with different men seen negatively while men who have lots of sex seen negatively? I think there are good answers to this. But MRAs should not be trying to completely destroy the not…
/r/MensRights19/08/12 08:18 PM
1

As apposed to being raped by other men? I don't see whats surprising about this.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 07:20 AM
-4

People finding rape jokes funny and people blaming victims for rape and people thinking murderers who get raped is not a big deal are all completely different and unrelated phenomenon. I see no reason to digress each separate issue and lump it together with the idealist umbrella term of "rape culture".
/r/MensRights19/08/12 05:29 AM
9

I don't really believe its anything serious beyond High School relationship troubles, and it really happens to both males and females. The only thing about this I care about is that the guy is often vilified as a "beta" male, because he is unable to achieve the standard of masculinity or attraction, and people often don't give a shit. I think its bullshit. If a girl wasn't adequate enough to be seen as attractive, no one would be okay with calling her a "beta loser female".
/r/MensRights19/08/12 02:08 AM
5

What definition exactly? Friendzone isn't generally believed to be anything more than a guy who chases a girl who perceives him as a friend and nothing more.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 02:06 AM
-7

Woah. I am not going to deny that its possible for someone to go from MRA to feminist, but I don't agree with your assertions.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 01:03 AM
2

5 years is a ridiculously long time to change your views.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 01:02 AM
9

I think Elly Tam's story is much more credible as Dr. Tam has an actual provable history with the feminist movement.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 12:55 AM
17

My account of it was very different. I intensely liked a girl, and refused to even think of her sexually. I thought she was the greatest thing in the world, and by far the most intelligent, humorous, witty, and nice person I'd known, male or female. The circumstances however, would never allow it to have create a reciprocal intimate relationship. I didn't think she owned me sex or a relationship even. Especially not because "thats how it is in patriarchy, as women are just my objects" bullshit. …
/r/MensRights18/08/12 07:24 PM
16

I have a troll account on Stormfront that is two years old. Not so difficult. But I suppose if the user has a lot of meaningful posts, it would validate it. I however dispute that this "ex-MRA" even has any forum accounts. He never even mentioned any organizations he belonged to. In the section "How I discovered the MRA", all he says is that he "started to take notice of the MRA movement". Its left very vague, which means it's suspicious that the poster isn't a real ex-MRA never had much of a co…
/r/MensRights18/08/12 07:10 PM
33

It reads like someone who was a murderer and then found Jesus.
/r/MensRights18/08/12 07:05 PM
15

I imagine all they have to do is get a single account on these forums and have a single random person say that he is Richard. Not exactly foolproof.
/r/MensRights18/08/12 06:49 PM
46

A bit suspicious, but possible. This part is entirely suspicious to me and makes me think a woman wrote it though. I also subscribed to the idea of the “friendzone” – a myth that almost every male I know still believes. It is a patriarchal belief that, if a man is respectful, friendly and genuine with a woman, that woman, by default, should be sexually/romantically interested in the man. Any rejection is called “friendzoning”. A man showing the same degree of friendliness he would fellow male fr…
/r/MensRights18/08/12 06:48 PM
11

I imagine they would still be cheering if women made 2x what men made.
/r/MensRights18/08/12 06:36 PM
1

God dammit, another boogie men attack on feminism being a Marxist movement. I am thinking about making a video explaining Marxist analysis of gender and how it differentiates from mainstream feminism.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 06:22 AM
2

Its not a feminist article and she wasn't talking about cat lady being a misogyny against women, but merely explaining as to why being a "cat lady" is okay for her. Regardless, its just stupid idealism.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 04:06 AM
2

Also, Marxism doesn't mean that you think that the dichotomy of oppressor and oppressed applies to every situation and hence makes feminism a radical Marxist movement.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 01:02 AM
4

Also, eating after six thing is a complete myth, not to mention stupid.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 10:30 PM
-1

You're right but it was obvious sarcasm.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 10:23 PM
7

They're just lashing out from all the oppression. Why do you expect women to always be nice little girls, huh!?
/r/MensRights16/08/12 10:21 PM
19

Quite frankly I don't give a shit. I know discrimination exists against men. Pointing out a simple case of discrimination does nothing to bolster discussion nor does it further our interests. Its useless content. I pointed this out to /r/feminism, and I am not going to be a hypocrite about it here.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 10:16 PM
13

In the US? Vietnam was most recent.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 09:38 PM
18

Im quoting girlwriteswhat here Automatic own-group preference by gender is a psychological mechanism women possess but men lack. In fact, men are three times as likely to automatically "prefer" women to other men, all other things being equal. This is precisely due to gender roles through human history that involved men competing with each other for mating opportunities, and bashing each other over the head to protect women--those things would be psychologically impossible for men to have ever d…
/r/MensRights16/08/12 08:41 PM
26

Chances are slim in what sense? That it won't happen in the next year? Look at history and there are PLENTY of wars and drafts where men were conscripted in. Military service is still very much required for males in many countries.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 08:35 PM
-2

No it doesn't.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 08:03 PM
1

Patriarchy is merely the concept of the father being in charge of the household. Which yes, creates strict gender roles that both men and women. Mainstream feminism just blows the term out of proportion.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 04:59 PM
4

Feminism in general is NOT a Marxist movemenet, and Marxism almost entirely rejects mainsream feminism. Edit: As far as I can tell, they reject what they call "bourgeois" feminism that puts gender before class.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 04:32 PM
2

I was just differentiating as to what feminists believe rape culture is.That is, their definition of "revolves around the idea that rape is a result of a patriarchal society that and is a tool used to keep women in control and generally proposes that victim blaming is prevalent."
/r/MensRights16/08/12 08:49 AM
7

Rape culture as a theory revolves around the idea that rape is a result of a patriarchal society that and is a tool used to keep women in control and generally proposes that victim blaming is prevalent. Its not simply the idea that rape occurs and that there are issues and misinformation about it by the public. In which, case it becomes a meaningless term.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 08:08 AM
1

Wearing make up? Extensively shopping? Taking interest in cars and technology?
/r/MensRights16/08/12 04:45 AM
8

Rape is considered to be one of the most appalling crimes in our society. I really wonder how many people actually protect rapists and say that the rapist should be able to rape women because it was always the women's fault. The shocking part is that in any study on how prevalent victim blaming is, its found that more women than men are likely to say the female victim of rape is partially or completely responsible when intoxicated. Heres one study I found http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-…
/r/MensRights16/08/12 04:41 AM
2

The problem I have is that egalitarian views are very much stained by "Women are oppressed by patriarchy and mens problems are the result of women being oppressed"
/r/MensRights16/08/12 04:16 AM
2

I wasn't talking either about tomboys or sexual preference. Just that females can very much enjoy activities considered masculine if they aren't raised as little princesses.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 04:13 AM
1

Ahh alright. I seen someone go through the trouble of making the Southpark Instructor into an "instructress", so I was a bit skeptical. Deleted my comment.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 03:40 AM
2

Sorry, I typed that on my phone.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 03:37 AM
17

Well to be fair, you can be conditioned to like something. I do imagine a lot of females would be less girly girls if they were raised like boys are.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 11:57 PM
5

Damn, you mean economic forces have something to do with wages?
/r/MensRights15/08/12 10:50 PM
0

Chill.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 10:26 PM
2

I think its a safe no for all of them.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 07:09 PM
3

Criminals stop being criminals! Criminals stop being criminals! Criminals stop being criminals! Damn, I feel good for making a change in the world. But the irony is outstanding. We already have a social stigma in our society that says "You should never hit a girl", and this video message is nothing but a extension of that sexist attitude. I think the message should be the opposite, that its not any less okay to hit a woman than it is to hit a man. I see no reason as to why women should be protec…
/r/MensRights15/08/12 03:16 AM
3

The point of the attack wasnt to delete the videos, it was to remove them from Youtub so others cant watch them. Deleting all your videos and packing up is completely unnecessary and just gives the attavkers more than they wanted.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 11:03 PM
4

I am pretty sure she has her videos on her harddrive. Also, I believe a takedown for copyright infringement doesn't mean the videos are deleted, just no longer available to the public.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 08:51 PM
7

Top left Downthemall http://www.downthemall.net/
/r/MensRights14/08/12 08:50 PM
1

I am not sure. I was thinking about this before but there isn't many female comedians in the first place. Sarah Silverman I think is the most famous one, and I just don't find her jokes very funny. Who else? I think what you're saying has merit though. Also consider sitcom shows were the common trope is the fat incompetent husband and his hot attractive wife.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 08:16 PM
5

I assume she has the videos saved on her hard drive...
/r/MensRights14/08/12 08:04 PM
-2

Women arent charged for murders? Cmon dimissing that most violent crome is commited by males is fucking stupid.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 07:18 AM
2

The point is that men are more likely to hurt women than women are to hurt men.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 04:41 AM
5

Oh yeah. Nooooooo one thinks a woman can be polite but not a pushover. Almost all of them hold just as much to be true if you replaced women with male. Pussy? Really? Thats almost exclusively used on males. Its a dumb post from Tumblr, go figure. If /r/feminism wants to take stuff like this seriously, they're plauging their own subreddit. But I rather not see useless content like this here.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 01:48 AM
6

Believing a concept itself is an entity that is of existence and has profound effects on society? That's pretty idealist. I even seen some feminists say thing like "The patriarchy..."
/r/MensRights14/08/12 12:09 AM
2

Academic? I think you mean "idealist"
/r/MensRights13/08/12 11:41 PM
16

Here you go http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wuJJuK7ADk8 Is NOW feminist enough for you? Sorry but there even are anti-feminist feminists like Camille Pagila, that think that the majority of feminism is bullshit. You cant reduce a whole movement into an idealized definition.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 11:18 PM
29

Watch her please. She has a lot of great videos and is very educated and informed on the topic and explains well. I know its a lot, but she does a better job than anyone else I seen. Here's the rest of her videos You can just go ahead and ignore everything I wrote and watch her videos. The problem I have with feminism is for its tendency to view women as being an oppressed class and attribute all problems to male privilege and "patriarchy" which holds that society is centered around oppressing w…
/r/MensRights12/08/12 10:34 PM
6

I think you're jumping the gun here. I am pretty sure there are at least some women out there who are the breadwinners in the household. To reduce a complex scenario into dominance and women being attracted to money seems ridiculous.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 06:24 AM
7

Well treated like shit doesn't equate to given fair and equal standing. You wouldn't argue for example that the success of the South's economy meant that blacks weren't being treated like shit.
/r/MensRights11/08/12 10:17 PM
6

Its because men only objectify women on their looks and disregard their accomplishments! Women on the other hand take into account a guys whole life accomplishments before saying "Can I find his abs sexually arousing now?"
/r/MensRights11/08/12 10:14 PM
10

There were only a few and they seen to have been instantly downvoted.
/r/MensRights11/08/12 06:53 AM
0

Its gives us some understanding as to how the economic concept of marriage developed. In that it establishes how the social development of the male's labor buying the women's fertility could have been established.
/r/MensRights11/08/12 06:39 AM
2

Well it seems you're very stringent on keeping the title of "feminism", and yet I don't see why. You said the reasons were because you were in an abusive relationship with some men and that you deserved the same rights as anyone. I think I quite clearly demonstrated or at tried to refute those points, but you did not respond to them. And now you're merely claiming that feminism is not guilty of what I mentioned but is truly an egalitarian movement that doesn't throw men under the bus. While I th…
/r/MensRights10/08/12 09:44 PM
5

Firstly, because I feel I deserve the same rights as anyone else in this world. (I think we all pretty much agree on that one.) While researching both movements, I saw that while all of the feminists I had come into contact with and were intimate with were vying for equal rights not just for women, but for EVERYONE, the MRAs that I knew personally were focusing primarily (and in some cases, exclusively) on men's rights only. The mens rights movement is mostly a reaction to the feminist movement.…
/r/MensRights10/08/12 07:44 PM
1

Sure. Well, what questions do you have? Why do you identify yourself as a feminist instead of MRA, for example? Also, here. http://www.youtube.com/user/girlwriteswhat/videos?sort=p&view=0 I think she is one of the most intelligent and knowledgeable persons on the topic. Watch some her videos and tell me what you think.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 07:12 PM
2

"Male culture is mainstream culture". What? If anyone doesn't recognize sexuality as an inherent and natural instinct within the animal kingdom, they're complete idiots.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 07:18 AM
4

To think white men don't have it better than black women is simply ridiculous. However much of that privilege stems from pre-existing socioeconomic status. The point of affirmative action for blacks is to correct this huge disadvantage that still currently exists. The court system also by far favors whites. I don't know what you're talking about.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 07:06 AM
3

Who gives a shit?
/r/MensRights09/08/12 07:13 PM
1

I am not really aware of an MRA movement that tried this and ended up being a feminist movement. Care to enlighten?
/r/MensRights09/08/12 08:19 AM
-5

Slippery slope fallacy
/r/MensRights09/08/12 07:30 AM
1

I feel however, that we would have much greater success if we were not to associate with being concerned with only men's rights.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 06:49 AM
2

What do you find conservative about the discussion in the link you posted?
/r/MensRights09/08/12 02:59 AM
7

Thank you.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 09:45 PM
0

Sure, but this, along with the FB posts and what not do nothing but to circle jerk and add no content to the discussion.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 09:16 PM
6

Uhh. So you cant find random people you don't know as sexually attractive because it treats them as "meat"? That kind of what sexuality is, and both women and men do it. Do you find anything wrong with watching porn? Oh yeah and if you don't just comment on their ass and tits and make a move to get to know the woman better but aren't good looking enough, you're a creep. If there is nothing wrong with being attracted to women's breasts, why it any more wrong to talk about it? If someone actually …
/r/MensRights08/08/12 07:28 PM
3

I still don't see much wrong with it. Sexuality is very natural, and both men and women engage in it. So long as you're not being rude, whose to say whose tits or ass I can find attractive or not?
/r/MensRights08/08/12 06:40 PM
3

What I don't like is the double standard in that if a site did that with women's breasts it would be vilified.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 06:38 PM
5

Theres nothing wrong with saying its funny.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 06:36 PM
14

I thought by the title you meant FB posts are not okay, so I upvoted in mistake.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 06:30 PM
4

False abuse allegation would kind of have been an ideal choice considering the circumstances that his husband is a drug dealer, murderer, and still potentially putting his family in danger. But shit, keep this in /r/breakingbad please.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 06:18 PM
1

I highly recommended watching girlwriteswhat's videos as a start. She gives an excellent and well informed perspective. http://www.youtube.com/user/girlwriteswhat/videos
/r/MensRights08/08/12 08:37 AM
1

Yes, and I wanted to hate you for it. It seems feminists take patriarchy to be more about blaming patriarchy, then simply using it as a term that helps us in understanding the material developments that lead to our contemporary gender roles. Its especially humorous when they actually say "the patriarchy" as if its something of actual material existence that has the ability to cause and affect things. Take that poster thing that was going around "It is patriarchy that makes men blabla", the fuck?…
/r/MensRights08/08/12 06:24 AM
1

I agree with this, however it pains me to no end when feminists use the term akin to religious dogma.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 05:43 AM
2

IE. A maid vs. a janitor. (I read this in the book Nicked and Dimed.) That's not even relevant. Those are two completely different positions hired by completely different institutions. Eg, a hotel or motel, vs a government funded school. Whats the point here. That people actively pay women less for work because...they hate women? If employers could hire women at a less cost than a man, they would. Pay rates are dictated my economic forces, not by a misogynistic attitude in hiring policies.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 05:34 AM
1

Whats your perception of 2X? In a lot of ways, I find their views more childlike than on /r/feminism.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 05:23 AM
1

Can you please for the love of god, define patriarchy? Its just a concept, it doesn't do anything. You can't say "its because of patriarchy". It makes absolutely no logical sense.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 05:18 AM
3

Is it really that hard to understand that patriarchy is just a concept, and not actually an entity capable of doing things?
/r/MensRights08/08/12 04:19 AM
1

Great, now define patriarchy and validate its existence by demonstrating its ability to cause or affect related phenomenon.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 04:01 AM
2

Who even say any of those things about men? No one other than idiot tumblr girls have told me that all men are stupid and unchanging, and have animalistic instincts when it comes to assaulting people.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 03:55 AM
0

Oh man. Im really enjoying my immunity to cancer.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 03:54 AM
2

One thing is you're not considering is that it largely depends on whose initiating the sex. If a drunk women climbs on top of you and you're drunk as well, I would highly doubt that they would say its rape. (or I sure hope so) But it does seem to revolve around the idea that only woman can be victims as sex is being viewed as a "man on women" thing, instead of something thats done by two people. The men and women have sex together vs the man has sex with the woman.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 03:47 AM
17

Its OP.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 04:18 AM
2

Not it was responded in the post. I didn't follow it throughly so I am not sure. But it seemed disorganized.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 01:46 AM
2

He didn't exactly publish them. OP kind of made it a mess since he didn't make any graphs or anything and just reported the survey results when people asked for it, through text.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 01:39 AM
4

I would have preferred it stuck to demographic questions rather than on opinions on issues.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 01:09 AM
0

That's fine.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 12:16 AM
1

What exactly is wrong with the mrm page?
/r/MensRights05/08/12 10:37 PM
1

Fucking christ, the message is that humanity is awesome and capable of doing greagreat things. No need to make it gendered.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 09:00 PM
0

Sexuality is normal and there is nothing inherently wrong with it. I don't see any rational reason to restrict it just because "its wrong". Morality evolves based on its economic precedents. Women no longer are tied to the husband's will and to working at home, and that's good...birth rates plummeting aside...
/r/MensRights05/08/12 08:32 PM
-2

Society doesn't do anything buddy. Only individuals within them do, individuals which happen to be both men and women. It happens to be religious fundamentalists (men and women) that are protesting abortion because they legitimately believe that life starts at birth and so abortion is immoral as it kills humans. Its not a "we hate women and think they shouldn't have any right to their vaginas" campaign. As of the bit about entitelement, lol. Man generally want vagina, as women want cock. Because…
/r/MensRights05/08/12 08:26 PM
2

Quite frankly I don't like calling women whores. Nothing wrong with sexuality.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 08:25 PM
0

I believe women and men hold very similar voting patterns. Or at least that was true when women got the right to vote after the 19th Amendment. I don't think anythings changed.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 06:25 PM
-1

Look at marriage historically and tell me that it was such a great party for her. But wait, you think women marry man for the wedding?
/r/MensRights05/08/12 06:23 PM
16

I wouldn't use the term misandry here. That implies an actual hatred or dislike of men. All this says is that there are stereotypes for men as well.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 06:22 PM
2

You're missing the point. While feminists do recognize women as being underprivileged economically, they do not explain the development of this inequality by looking at the material and economic reasons that caused it. They view it as being a result of patriarchy instead of economic developments. If you don't get what I am saying, sorry but I am not going to bother responding anymore.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 05:45 AM
6

Like I said, looking at oppression through a "Marxist lens" means dealing with its economic causes. If anything its naive to not consider the economic developments that necessitated gender roles. A tenet essential to Marxism is its historical materialism, which holds "that the world is changed not by ideas but by actual, physical, material activity and practice". Feminists tend to ignore this and instead explain women's oppression as being a result of males and patriarchy and hence primarily wis…
/r/MensRights05/08/12 05:34 AM
7

No it isn't. Marxism entails much more than the concept of oppressor/oppressed. Any idealogy that rests on the idea of oppression isn't Marxism. Marxism deals only with the economic concept of class, and nothing more. A Marxist analysis of gender would mean you look at gender in terms of its relation to economic hierarchy or the material world in general. I.e, males are seen as being more disposable as fertility has historically been very important. Feminism doesn't say that gender is the result…
/r/MensRights05/08/12 05:25 AM
6

Marxism looks at history materially. That alone sets feminism and idealized conceptions of patriarchy far far away from Marxism. Marx held a staunch position against such idealism.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 05:17 AM
0

Meh. Rad fems don't compose feminism in general. I can tell you /r/feminism generally falls out of that generalization completely.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 05:15 AM
1

Theres obviously plenty of counter examples. But regardless, does she think that the media industry is actually secretly a misogynistic propaganda machine that systematically tries to deem women as inferior? I cringe when people pose such idealized romantic bullshit as being some new mystical perspective of the world.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 05:13 AM
1

I think the real ironic is that these conceptions itself are implications of male disposibility.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 05:08 AM
11

Eggs are designated to be either female or male as soon as its been fertilized by a sperm. Sex is determined on whether or not the sperm from the male contains the Y or X chromosome. An zygote in its origin hence can be classified as either male or female. I am not even sure if its correct to say that in fetal development, the female anatomy develops into a male. Do female reproductive organ and breasts develop and then disappear? I did find this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defeminization_and_m…
/r/MensRights05/08/12 04:51 AM
4

Its not even to say that the rapist isn't to blame. That has nothing to do with it. No one is blaming the victim for being a victim, or saying they caused it. Just that they could have prevented it with better care.
/r/MensRights04/08/12 09:00 PM
1

The message was to be careful and not put yourself in a position which can increase the risk of that happening.
/r/MensRights04/08/12 08:59 PM
2

Actually, I would say misogyny/misandry is more severe then most cases of sexism. As many people that might be sexist, there is only a few who actually have a hatred of the sex.
/r/MensRights04/08/12 08:08 AM
2

I don't think you have a much understanding of evolution. Changes in things like hair and skin color, due to changes in breeding patterns and genetic drifts, are part of evolution. Evolution doesn't mean you have to grow arms and legs with every mutation. Genetic changes also don't have to affect whole populations to be considered evolutionary developments. I am not sure if the loss of hair is something that occurred within the last 10,000 years, but that is nonetheless a very tiny amount of tim…
/r/MensRights04/08/12 07:39 AM
3

I like how every time when feminists ask whether they see the draft as being discriminatory against men, they dodge the question by saying "Well, we don't think the draft should exist for either sex".
/r/MensRights03/08/12 06:43 PM
3

I am a white cis straight male. Where do I pick up my money and immunity to cancer? I think privilege in our society has all to do with socio economic status rather than race or sex. Blacks and women have a legal superiority at least now, as our government very much protects groups seen as being historically oppressed. However most problems with the blacks for example come from poverty, single motherhood, bad schools, bad neighborhoods, and etc. However, is this to say that every white person ha…
/r/MensRights03/08/12 06:33 PM
2

Thank you. That would the first real rational response I have gotten about the definition. Feminists make it out to seem that "the patriarchy" is a mystical force in the universe that actively victimizes women, rather than just a concept. Regardless, wouldn't you still completely discard that notion as being a completely unscientific approach and nothing more than an untestable hypothesis? Society is nothing more than the individuals it consists and the interactions between those individuals. Th…
/r/MensRights03/08/12 07:35 AM
2

I think its hilarious how when mentioning it they very frequently say "The patriarchy". But seriously, how does a concept do anything? I still haven't heard a rational response as to explain this magical force in the universe.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 07:29 AM
2

Male Privilege is not being told “Men don’t poop”. Women are silenced about any bodily functions with the words “girls don’t poop”. Natural ways of life are considered disgusting for a female and it’s “better if she doesn’t mention anything about it because it’s not pleasing for a man to think about.” Lol. Women love it when I talk about how I shit.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 07:29 AM
4

I actually find it incredibly hypocritical and sexist that women are again seen by these people to be victims and in need of special protection from male sexuality. I think the whole idea arises from that conception of traditional roles of masculinity and femininity. No one seems to give a shit about the ladies in /r/ladyboner who are posting male Olympians as eye candy, however. In fact, the more they do so, the more positive image the male has for being able to attract women. But sexualize a f…
/r/MensRights02/08/12 07:06 AM
1

Its not a problem. Sexuality is a very prominent part of being an organism, let alone a human. I see nothing wrong with looking at the fittest and strongest bodies on Earth sexually. Even the Olympians "objectify" each other all the time. http://espn.go.com/olympics/summer/2012/story/_/id/8133052/athletes-spill-details-dirty-secrets-olympic-village-espn-magazine
/r/MensRights02/08/12 07:02 AM
0

Honestly, I don't give a shit.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 06:59 AM
2

Honestly, "mens rights" isn't the best thing to call it.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 06:56 AM
2

Its a bit tricky Aggravated assault is, in some jurisdictions, a stronger form of assault, usually using a deadly weapon.[5] A person has committed an aggravated assault when that person: attempts to cause serious bodily injury to another person such as in the case of kidnapping attempts to have sexual activity with another person under the age of consent attempts or causes bodily injury to another person by using a deadly weapon (see Dennis J. Baker, Glanville Williams' Textbook of Criminal Law…
/r/MensRights01/08/12 08:37 PM
2

Its makes no sense logically in the first place. His main point is that "more women died for men" as evidenced by...childbirth. That does nothing to counter the traditional CULTURAL view that men should be protective of women. Women dying during childbirth wasn't "I am going to die so you can live". It was simply due to an unfortunate natural cause in which a choice wasn't even involved. It doesn't involve a conscious sacrifice. If anything the common cultural norm would be for the male to say "…
/r/MensRights01/08/12 02:52 AM
1

He later said that he was sorry for not making it gender neutral and apologized for not mentioning it.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 08:16 AM
2

I don't even understand the "rape is about power". Well, isn't all forms of violence based on coercion and hence "about power"?
/r/MensRights31/07/12 08:15 AM
1

That's great, but I think we have enough useless meme like submissions already.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 08:13 AM
4

Because if women have the same rights as men, then men wont be rapists, silly.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 08:12 AM
0

God damn, Marxism has nothing to do with feminism. Why is that so thrown around?
/r/MensRights31/07/12 08:03 AM
1

Feminists read blogs...
/r/MensRights31/07/12 08:00 AM
0

Yeah as opposed to actually questionable scenarios, a serial rapist being a troll and joking about rape makes you have an epiphany on how rape culture is stupid. Okay...
/r/MensRights31/07/12 07:59 AM
2

Even worse as she says that this is what made her have an epiphany about the rape culture thing. A serial rapist joking and trolling about rape while describing horrific scenes makes her realize "rape culture" is bullshit? Obvious troll.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 07:58 AM
0

Squirm - Wriggle or twist the body from side to side, esp. as a result of nervousness or discomfort.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 07:56 AM
0

Probably because squirming and crying sounds a lot different from moaning from sexual satisfaction.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 07:54 AM
4

Unless you have actual criticism, your words mean nothing.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 07:48 AM
1

Would anyone be interested in writing a blog or making Youtube videos? I think that would be far more effective.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 07:41 AM
3

If you want to improve women's rights in the Middle East, you would have to modernize and industrialize the country, develop schools, improve education, create a secular government, get rid of religion, etc etc. The problem has very little to do with "oppression of women" and a lot more to do with a society that still very much necessitates traditional gender roles and hence still upholds traditional views on women.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 07:30 AM
1

Spanish anarchism during the Civil war.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 07:15 AM
0

I am very familiar with Marxism, and by its own doctrine am very compelled against feminism. Pretty sure none of those women know what Marxism is. What did Marx's views on historical materialism and economics, in the 19th century, have to do with the second feminist movement that emerged in the 60s?
/r/MensRights31/07/12 06:51 AM
2

Can someone explain what feminism has to do with Marxism? I used to call myself a Marxist but I do not at all see the resemblance other than that modern socialists tend to be very progressive on these issues.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 06:28 AM
3

I find that characteristic to be defining point of feminism. What else warrants its existence as an ism? Any non-bigot and certainly the majority of people in higher education would consider equal rights between men and women to be a good thing. Why then, would anyone have to identify as a feminist? It quickly becomes a radical ideology and akin to religious dogma, because any level headed person has no need to call themselves a feminist.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 06:18 AM
3

Because feminism revolves around idealist misconceptions like "the patriarchy", and hence feminists believe that if everyone were to be a feminist then the whole world would change.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 05:37 AM
3

GWW is completely against feminism. me a feminist? no way. I think you have to agree that the general defining aspect of feminism is its concept of patriarchy and male dominance, which completely disregards logical evolutionary, biological, economic, and social precedents in favor of a simplified "women's oppression".
/r/MensRights30/07/12 09:54 PM
3

We should all make Tumblrs.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 09:30 PM
0

Yes lets just tell people to stop. That will work. Have social movements ever worked in actually changing anything?
/r/MensRights30/07/12 09:29 PM
6

Basically you can't ever have sex with a woman when you're both drunk even if she wants it at the time because later she can say "no, sorry. You raped me"
/r/MensRights30/07/12 09:28 PM
1

I think its good to point out that gender roles go both ways. If the purpose of it were to show the ridiculousness of the methods and conclusions made by Anita by pointing out that the same can be done from the other perspective, I think its good.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 06:18 PM
3

Birth rates man...
/r/MensRights30/07/12 07:07 AM
1

Where did you get that?
/r/MensRights30/07/12 06:52 AM
1

Seriously. Video games are the result of artists and developers for the purpose of creativity and profit, not some anti-men or anti-women propaganda campaign. At worst, they carry the already existent generalizations within reality. It should be no surprise that there is going to be more men in fighting roles, especially if its a war game, gangster game, etc.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 06:50 AM
3

Greer argued in her book, The Female Eunuch, that women do not realise how much men hate them, and how much they are taught to hate themselves Greer argued that women should get to know and come to accept their own bodies, taste their own menstrual blood, and give up celibacy and monogamy. But they should not burn their bras. "Bras are a ludicrous invention," she wrote, "but if you make bralessness a rule, you're just subjecting yourself to yet another repression." Greer has defined her goal as …
/r/MensRights30/07/12 06:46 AM
3

I don't think there is anything wrong in acknowledging that generalizations do exist. Walking on the street you are more likely to be assaulted by a male. Its completely rationale to avoid strangers at night. Its as simple as that.
/r/MensRights29/07/12 07:13 AM
1

Im pretty sure the insurance companies have a load of statistical data and mathematics they make decisions on, not perceived social stereotypes.
/r/MensRights29/07/12 07:05 AM
-2

Watch her http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqEeCCuFFO8 I think your notion that masculinity has arisen from a few decades rather than the result of hundreds of millions of years of evolution and embedded in biology, is rather naive. And I don't see why you label yourself as a feminist if you truly believe that male genders roles do exist, and are as harmful to men as female gender roles are. To discard the economic and biological needs for gender roles too is rather naive. But what's your position…
/r/MensRights29/07/12 06:49 AM
5

Feminist don't give a shit about males. They can spout all day about achieving gender equality but yet will forget that men have a gender too.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 01:28 AM
7

Can someone even explain and define "objectification"? So women decide on a guy's attractiveness based on his whole looks, while men can find certain body parts of women attractive? I am not really understanding the conclusion at all. Objectify is a pretty loaded but useless word.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 08:57 PM
1

Oh fuck off. Get ina situation like that where youre tear gassed, being shot attacked while everyone is screaming and dying and then try to make the event sound like a fucking casual negotiation.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 08:15 AM
7

How the fuck do you know that?
/r/MensRights26/07/12 08:00 AM
1

Also PLENTY of rape against women that happens all the time in these places that isn't reported at all.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 03:19 AM
0

Has this been brought up on /r/politics? Im surprised I never heard of this before. Also, arguably, cant this help women in the long term?
/r/MensRights25/07/12 05:17 AM
4

Tell her that you agree and that shes very smart and beautiful.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 02:29 AM
3

Shes gonna love college!
/r/MensRights25/07/12 02:28 AM
2

Sorry what you were saying wasn't making sense no matter how many times I read it. I mean understand what you were saying, that is. The idea is that men were, say, Rank A and women Rank B. Feminism focuses on women reaching Rank A. Since men are already Rank A, no focus is put on them gaining extra rights. Their rights, the rights they had to begin with are what feminism works to bring female rights towards. Feminism is based around bringing females up - not bringing men down, and not bringing m…
/r/MensRights25/07/12 02:17 AM
1

Centring out either sex is, in my opinion, a bit silly No it isn't. Gender roles, and consequently the differing issues within each sex, are the result of the same phenomenon and are both subject to the same precedents of evolution, biology, economics, and social developments. Women being the equals of man implies man being the equals of women, so how can you ignore men's issues that prevent them from reaching that same equality? It quickly becomes a circlejerk and the victim game, and thats ess…
/r/MensRights25/07/12 01:56 AM
5

Supposedly its not about female rights, its about equal rights...which would warrant a discussion about both sexes.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 01:49 AM
1

The sexism in the gaming industry, then?
/r/MensRights25/07/12 01:20 AM
1

I really don't think anyone would find that misogynistic.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 12:54 AM
1

I think you're taking it wrong. There are differences in men and women, and some work is better suited for men or women. Shes not saying women are superior.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 12:54 AM
4

You mean our perceptions of gender have to do with the economic, biological, and other various complex foundation of society? Gasp.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 08:32 PM
-1

I think she just supported the gaming industry a lot more then she helped to fight it.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 07:47 PM
2

Its total bullshit in the first place. The feminist movement had nothing to do with her being allowed to become a CEO. Economic changes did.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 07:45 PM
0

Do feminists really think they have themselves to thank for the liberation of women? I like how Amelia Earthart is on Google's page right now, who died 30 years before the 2nd feminist movement.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 07:14 PM
6

No man. Rape would instantly stop and men and women could both have babies, transforming the complete economic needs of gender roles. Divorces would no longer be needed, birth rates would shoot way back up without even having the need for pregnancy, women will enter STEM fields, their bodies will never be objectified every again and everything will be well.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 07:03 PM
3

"well were not saying the patriarchy doesn't hurt men either! We just want to talk about womens issues now [all the time]"
/r/MensRights24/07/12 07:01 PM
3

If a women was president, what the fuck would change?
/r/MensRights24/07/12 06:57 PM
0

And to be honest, people who disagree here aren't very well taken either. But then we dont tell people to get out either.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 06:54 PM
-1

I completely agree and I absolutely hate it when the victim mentality creeps in here. I remember a post here where someone commented about how mens sexuality are being demonized. Really, what the fuck?
/r/MensRights24/07/12 05:42 AM
5

You make a good point. However, I still think that there would be no expectations at all for a female to jump in front of her boyfriend, on the other hand a male would be criticized if he didn't show bravery in protecting his girlfriend. But, yes, there was no need to make the shooting the center of this issue.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 05:07 AM
2

Idiot's exist, apparently =/
/r/MensRights24/07/12 05:03 AM
1

Where'd you get that statistic? The one I saw was that 99% of reported rapes were males.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 03:17 AM
1

I don't understand this attitude about consent. Sex is a mutual act between two parties, in which both need to give consent. So why then is there such a stigma that the men is the one who always initiates sex and that the woman is submissive? The man has sex with the woman versus the man and woman have sex with eachother. In the former viewpoint, theres the idea that the man is the dominant position in sex. So why then do feminists always objectify women as being any less sexual, or less deviant…
/r/MensRights24/07/12 03:01 AM
10

Another post with useless content.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 12:56 AM
17

Empowering women not to look at themselves as victims but rather as humans who can do the same job as males produces better results then whining about "the patriarchy". How interesting.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 12:31 AM
3

At least in the form of racism, which is disadvantageous to blacks, yes. However, I completely disagree with the term "privilege". There is no institutional law that favors whites. The bulk and primary cause of black's problems come from things like poverty, single motherhood, and etc. While not in the same numbers, whites can be subject to the same problems, and be even in worse conditions than blacks. Privilege in our society has much more to do with money than it does to do with skin color.
/r/MensRights23/07/12 06:56 PM
0

:)
/r/MensRights23/07/12 03:19 AM
2

Hello, girlwriteswhat! I was watching your interview with Stefan Molyneux, host of Freedomain Radio the other day. You guys brought up the book Naked Men, which deals with this topic. Do you have any other reading material you would suggest concerning the MRM or feminism? Also, thank you very much for your videos.
/r/MensRights23/07/12 01:33 AM
2

Thats understandable. Before I even got into this gender issues, I'd tell my male friends to go fuck themselves for thinking that you should never hit a girl or that you should pay for the date and what not. I always absolutely hated such "gentlemen" attitudes, that essentially boiled down to you having to put women's needs and lives ahead of yours. That women are suppose to be a protected group and that women can be victims but men are not allowed to be. I think feminisms ignorance of this is i…
/r/MensRights22/07/12 07:34 AM
1

No I completely agree. I was just commenting on that part where you would find it suspect if a girl asked for you to carry her bags. As long as its not a 5 pound object, its reasonable.
/r/MensRights22/07/12 07:14 AM
1

Feminists: "This just shows the patriarchy and rape culture hurts men too!"
/r/MensRights22/07/12 06:42 AM
2

Depends on the carrying bags thing. I would be happy to carry a girls bags as its a lot less strenuous for me.
/r/MensRights22/07/12 06:34 AM
1

I was expecting something interesting since OP thought it was worthy of posting it here (and on /r/feminism) If I found her video on the sidebar on Youtube I wouldn't even had clicked.
/r/MensRights21/07/12 11:02 PM
7

Shes attacking a strawman. Feminists don't think you should pay for their dates. Some valid points but its an overall stupid video. I posted girlwriteswhat, who is 10x of a better speaker and didn't get any positive responses on /r/feminism.
/r/MensRights21/07/12 10:31 PM
8

Have you ever heard of the phrase "You should never hit a girl?"
/r/MensRights21/07/12 07:00 PM
1

Also, just because more men are in powerful positions, this does not equate to the general, average male, as being any better off or having any privilege. Much lower strata of our society is composed of men, including the homeless, the prison populations, etc. This is known as the Apex fallacy.
/r/MensRights21/07/12 07:26 AM
0

Oh cmon. Not everything is a conspiracy against men. Can we stop posting this stupid shit all together? Im tired of seeing submissions here with no content at all.
/r/MensRights21/07/12 07:12 AM
3

I must really hate women.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 07:41 PM
2

Thats not the issue. Its about whether the formation of a patriarchy and gender roles came about from the natural consequences of nature, most obviously being the biological differences that would have necessitated gender roles in order for humanity to survive and reproduce successfully. Feminists claim, or ignore this claim all together, and instead say that gender roles are purely a social construct that were invented to make women more submissive, or whatever the reason. I think its completel…
/r/MensRights20/07/12 04:25 PM
2

You never heard the term "flat chest"? Women are also made fun of for too large breasts
/r/MensRights20/07/12 03:26 PM
2

What would you say are those multitude of reasons? There are many studies showing stereotype threat is a real phenomena affecting both men and women negatively. I am very passionate about education advocacy, so I see more problems with males in education than females now actually mostly. However, many studies show that teachers tend to challenge women less in STEM fields and call on boys more often than girls, etc. I can go on with male facts too, so by citing this stat, I don't mean that men ar…
/r/MensRights20/07/12 07:20 AM
3

Males like breasts, vaginas. Women like dicks. Is there something new here?
/r/MensRights20/07/12 07:01 AM
13

If you're with your friends, its different. But there is a level of appropriateness when you're on national television and not a comedian.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 06:46 AM
3

I am still quite astonished how feminism is considered an academic subject, when it even generally ignores evolutionary principles or any causality in general. Is the idea that gender roles have nothing to do with biological differences taken seriously?
/r/MensRights20/07/12 06:41 AM
1

Quite frankly, looking at Western Europe, and Japan especially, I am quite concerned as to what would happen when the nuclear family is disintegrated. There is a reason as to why the traditional gender roles and family allowed for such reproductive success of the human race, and as to why current populations with traditional values such as India are still experiencing huge booms. I don't know how to solve this problem however. Perhaps there needs to be a balance? Although I suppose this doesn't …
/r/MensRights20/07/12 06:39 AM
9

They also hate "PIV" (penis in vagina sex) because they consider it unnatural and hatred of women. Wait, are you serious?
/r/MensRights20/07/12 06:33 AM
21

Although its alarming that it would not be funny at all and completely serious if the genders were reversed.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 06:31 AM
2

Its their choice to make, not yours. Were not encouraging anyone.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 10:20 PM
2

Man, I wish I could speak as well as Girlwriteswhat.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 10:13 PM
9

As they should be. An accusation doesnt make a deed. But its not even true. Remember the Strauss Kahn incident?
/r/MensRights19/07/12 04:03 AM
6

Actually, men accused of rape and abuse are often vigorously defended. Fucking lol. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_v._Strauss-Kahn And this is a rich white guy in power.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 03:52 AM
1

This is fascinating really. Thanks for pointing it out earlier. I am still not sure if you're 100% right, but I am looking more into this. The only way to create sperm competition is to mate with multiple males. I think you were misunderstanding what I was saying. The females interest in having mating with as many males isn't to create sperm competition, but to increase her chances of having an offspring, no? I dont understand how increasing the amount of sperm competition would make your offspr…
/r/MensRights19/07/12 02:55 AM
2

If a women gets drunk and then gets raped, no one should be excusing the rapist of course. I don't think anyone does... However, its not "victim blaming" to goddamn say that women should try to be a little aware of the world and protect themselves from dangerous situations.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 02:20 AM
0

Depends if the man is drunk as well, then no. But I don't think taking advantage of a women if they're drunk is okay, even while it may not be correctly defined as rape.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 02:15 AM
1

I am being vilified by feminists for merely having a common-sense attitude about rape. I loathe this thing about date rape. Have twelve tequilas at a fraternity party and a guy asks you to go up to his room, and then you're surprised when he assaults you? Most women want to be seduced or lured. The more you study literature and art, the more you see it. Listen to Don Giovanni. Read The Faerie Queene. Pursuit and seduction are the essence of sexuality. It’s part of the sizzle. Girls hurl themselv…
/r/MensRights19/07/12 02:07 AM
2

Hmm. I have to give it some though. Can you explain how this would tie in with our modern gender roles? Does it change my conclusion that women have defined masculinity, seeing as that they were just as choosy? Or that men have generally been seen as having the role of support as they put much effort in feeding their mate and their offspring? Sub par offspring are more likely to happen if a female animal does not mate with as many male animals as she can. Can you explain this? How will the off s…
/r/MensRights19/07/12 01:25 AM
2

I believe women being limited in reproduction is at least relevant in many mammals, as women can only produce eggs certain times, and also can only have several offspring in a given year, while males on the other hand are almost always replenished with sperm. This at least hold true in humans. I am not sure if it has to do anything with the cost effectiveness of gamete production at all, at least in mammals. It is therefore much more costlier for a woman to go through pregnancy with a sub par of…
/r/MensRights19/07/12 01:06 AM
2

I will have to pass this on to my Biology professor. Do you still agree that evolutionary principles have had much say in developing gender roles?
/r/MensRights19/07/12 12:57 AM
2

And hence why plutocracy is an infinitely times better as an academic term when talking about society rather than patriarchy.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 11:48 PM
1

This is common for all of evolutionary history, and is called Bateman's principle. In biology, Bateman's principle is the theory that females almost always invest more energy into producing offspring than males invest, and therefore in most species females are a limiting resource over which the other sex will compete. It is named for English geneticist Angus John Bateman (1919–1996). Typically it is the females who have a relatively larger investment in producing each offspring. Bateman attribut…
/r/MensRights18/07/12 11:41 PM
7

Not only that, but these articles of clothing, including heels, lipstick, and etc are solely for the purpose of increasing the women's sexual appeal. Heels make the legs look longer, and give shape to the butt, signs of good genes. Women's poses serve to show women's curves, indicating child bearing capability. Makeup and beauty show signs of health and good genes. etc etc. These are evolutionary developments and to blame a guy for having a brain that still thinks its 20,000 years ago is complet…
/r/MensRights18/07/12 09:30 PM
2

Women's sexually is very very powerful and its deemed what the definition of masculinity is since the dawn of humanity. Why do you think women are attracted to successful, strong, and attractive men that can provide and protect her?
/r/MensRights18/07/12 09:25 PM
4

This makes sense. But can you say that the men should blame himself for "objectifying her" because she dresses in a matter which he deems to be sexually attractive? And to think that women don't do the same thing to men is damn stupid. Im a sexy women, stop objectifying me!
/r/MensRights18/07/12 09:21 PM
3

I dont agree on the part that they did it to get "sexual attention" , but Simon never even implied that. And yes, finding a women sexually appealing because they're almost fucking naked is not something to get angry about. I think Girlwriteswhat nailed it on this one. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-N9daqANcw
/r/MensRights18/07/12 09:07 PM
5

The confusion arises from the lack of a proper definition for "rape culture". Wikipedia defines it as "a controversial concept used to describe a culture in which rape and sexual violence are common and in which prevalent attitudes, norms, practices, and media normalize, excuse, tolerate, or even condone sexual violence." From what I read from feminist blogs and what not, rather then proposing a sensible definition and showing why or how this phenomenon exists and is prevalent within society, th…
/r/MensRights18/07/12 08:49 PM
2

Sorry, thats not how a population of a species works. Men and women need each other to reproduce and continue existing as a society, and that is essentially what gender and the rest of history revolves around. And yes, since the dawn of humanity, women have needed men for the strenuous labor and protection. Men have essentially played the support role while the biologically weaker women took to lighter chores. Even in a modern society, the question is pretty useless asking. What the fuck does th…
/r/MensRights18/07/12 06:57 AM
4

Not even the feminists at /r/feminism really argue that rape against men shouldn't be taken seriously. They just point out that society looks the other way in both cases is further proof of "rape culture"
/r/MensRights18/07/12 06:55 AM
-1

I think girls should be respected and that hurting others, even animals, is wrong. Isn't the traditional gender role of a male to respect women? You know, the whole gentleman thing, not using vulgar language towards women, hitting women is wrong, or you know the whole you have go die in this war so your wife can stay at home. Your friends are just assholes.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 05:51 AM
1

The idea that society can be compressed to a simple sphere of a patriarchy, where it was men vs the oppressed women is ridiculous. The notion that women were "oppressed" against in the public sphere historically is ridiculous and that it was the feminist movement that all of a sudden sprung up after hundreds of thousands of years of male patriarchy and turned the system on its head in less than half a century is again, ridiculous. Women have been the most protected group of individuals throughou…
/r/MensRights17/07/12 09:23 PM
1

Wasn't she pointing out the hypocrisy by being sarcastic?
/r/MensRights17/07/12 04:22 AM
-1

I think the actual issue is that why much rapes goes unreported. Thanks. But anyway, heres what I had to write about it, if you're interested. http://www.reddit.com/r/Feminism/comments/wlj3c/rape_culture_101/
/r/MensRights16/07/12 03:16 AM
1

I am always skeptical of statistics, especially when they don't even god damn mention the methods for polling. I googled the same thing and found this though so lets not succumb to feminazis and feel victimized because there isn't any research done on this. http://www.dailyfinance.com/2010/01/30/a-hidden-crime-domestic-violence-against-men-is-a-growing-probl/
/r/MensRights15/07/12 09:52 PM
-5

Someone doesn't understand how evolution works.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 09:07 PM
1

Not what I meant at all but I guess I worded it badly.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 07:05 PM
2

I didn't really understand any of her positions. The whole article was about the people she was criticizing and who criticized her.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 06:28 AM
0

Wow, great job. I am very pleased with your civility and your ability to stay rational and keep your responses so well organized. Can someone explain to me what the privilege thing is about though? It seems completely silly. Yes, being white or able bodied is absolutely a better position to be in then say being black, but isn't this something everyone knows? But to make it so black and white would do nothing but make such a serious issue into a "victim vs non victim" which seems to essentially b…
/r/MensRights15/07/12 06:24 AM
1

Its true, apparently according to some studies. http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=rape%20women's%20fault&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CEwQFjAA&url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1251040/Rape-Its-fault-victims-say-50-women.html&ei=I2ACUK6PKcTg2gXCxIjECw&usg=AFQjCNE7nFx9Cjy1X6SMGYfLlTvFe9WAwQ&sig2=y3C88KTSqrIhJQmNVqy8uQ&cad=rja The interesting thing they found is that women in greater percentages than men believe that women are to blame for their attack. Of course, I am not sure how well the…
/r/MensRights15/07/12 06:17 AM
7

I stated almost exactly this in /r/feminism and argued that in Western society, feminism is no longer something anyone needs to identify with, as women's rights are no longer uniquely a feminist issue, but rather a humans right issues and are ingrained in common culture, in federal and even international law. And as such, anyone having need to identify as feminists, deviates from the common culture which already establishes that women and men should have equal rights (Any public figure attemptin…
/r/MensRights15/07/12 05:47 AM
2

Men consists of individuals now? I thought were a collection of a cyber network with a shared consciousness like the geth.
/r/MensRights14/07/12 08:18 AM
1

Christ more of the same "Women are actively victimized by evil men" bullshit. Is the sexism there not so obvious? Instead of blaming say religion, which happens to be male dominated for various purposes, they always have to complain how men institute everything so that its against women.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 06:23 PM
7

But the rape culture! Men think raping women is okay!!
/r/MensRights12/07/12 10:59 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter